Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi

Behavioral scientists have been working since the early 1960s with a comprehensive approach to planned organizational change. Called organization development, or OD for short, it is defined as the application of behavioral science knowledge in a systematic and long-range effort to improve organizati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shaiful Annuar, Khalid
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/1/SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/2/1.SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.722
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Shaiful Annuar, Khalid
Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
description Behavioral scientists have been working since the early 1960s with a comprehensive approach to planned organizational change. Called organization development, or OD for short, it is defined as the application of behavioral science knowledge in a systematic and long-range effort to improve organizational effectiveness. In particular, OD seeks to help organizations cope with forces for change in their environments, and improve their internal effectiveness. One of the popular methods in Organizational Development is called survey feedback. This method is a comprehensive and systematic data collection to identify attitudes or perceptions, analyze results, and plan for constructive action. This research has adopted the survey feedback to improve the effectiveness of Mara Institute of Technology Perlis Branch. The units of analysis are non academic employees and the dependent variable is organizational effectiveness. The independent variables are organizational climate, team works, personnel development, individual responsibility. social support, the management of meetings, communication and objectives. Descriptive Statistics, Mean and Pearson’s Correlation are used to investigate the relationship between independent and dependent variable. The finding showed that there were significant and positive correlation between all independent variables and organizational effectiveness. Organizational climate and communication are found to have the strongest relationship with organizational effectiveness. In general, no significant differences are found in all independent variables based on demographic factors with several exceptions.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Shaiful Annuar, Khalid
author_facet Shaiful Annuar, Khalid
author_sort Shaiful Annuar, Khalid
title Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
title_short Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
title_full Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
title_fullStr Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
title_full_unstemmed Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi
title_sort penggunaan soalselidik maklumbalas untuk meningkatkan keberkesanan organisasi
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 1999
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/1/SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/2/1.SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf
_version_ 1747826982335283200
spelling my-uum-etd.7222013-07-24T12:08:41Z Penggunaan Soalselidik Maklumbalas Untuk Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Organisasi 1999-05-23 Shaiful Annuar, Khalid Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management Behavioral scientists have been working since the early 1960s with a comprehensive approach to planned organizational change. Called organization development, or OD for short, it is defined as the application of behavioral science knowledge in a systematic and long-range effort to improve organizational effectiveness. In particular, OD seeks to help organizations cope with forces for change in their environments, and improve their internal effectiveness. One of the popular methods in Organizational Development is called survey feedback. This method is a comprehensive and systematic data collection to identify attitudes or perceptions, analyze results, and plan for constructive action. This research has adopted the survey feedback to improve the effectiveness of Mara Institute of Technology Perlis Branch. The units of analysis are non academic employees and the dependent variable is organizational effectiveness. The independent variables are organizational climate, team works, personnel development, individual responsibility. social support, the management of meetings, communication and objectives. Descriptive Statistics, Mean and Pearson’s Correlation are used to investigate the relationship between independent and dependent variable. The finding showed that there were significant and positive correlation between all independent variables and organizational effectiveness. Organizational climate and communication are found to have the strongest relationship with organizational effectiveness. In general, no significant differences are found in all independent variables based on demographic factors with several exceptions. 1999-05 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/1/SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/722/2/1.SHAIFUL_ANNUAR_KHALID_-_Penggunaan_soalselidik_maklumbalas_untuk_meningkatkan_keberkesanan_organisasi.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Halim Ali. (1998). Sempena Hari Kualiti UUM dan Majlis Penganugerahan Khidmat Cemerlang Universiti Utara Malaysia. UUM, Sintok, 13 September. Abdullah Sanusi Ahmad. (1997). Mengukuhkan IPT Awam. Datataniaga, November, pp. 16-18. Agyris, C. (1970). Intervension Theory and Methods: A Behavioral Science View. Addison Wesley Publishing, New York, pp. 15-20. Ahmad Zainal Abidin, (1997). Perlakuan Organisasi. Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd. Kuala Lumpur. Alexander, C. (1998). Creating New Futures in Turbulent Times. Empowerment In Organizations, 06:8, pp. 201-209. Allenbaugh, G. E. (1981). An Organization Development Approach To improving Organizational Effectiveness. Tesis Dr. Fal. University of Oregon. Armstrong, M.(1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness. Kogan Page, London. Arroba, T. & Oppenheim, F. W. (1996). Why Are Common Obiectives So Common In Top Management Teams?. Team Performance management, 02:1, pp. 17-21. Bauer, R. S. (1982). How To Make OD Work Better For Your Organization. Management Review, June, pp. 45-56. Beck, K. & Wilson, C. (1997). Police officers' Views on Cultivating Organizational Commitment Implications For Police Managers. An International Journal of Police Strategies & management, 20:1, pp. 175-195. Beckhard, R. (1969). Organizational Development: Strategies and Models. Addison Wesley Publishing, New York. Beer, M. & Walton E. (1990). Developing the Competitive Organization: Interventions and Strategies, American Psychologist, Feb, pp. 154 - 161. Beer,M.( 1976).The technology of Organization Development. Handbook of Industrial And Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 937-993. Bergman, B.(1995).Quality In Academic Leadership: A contribution to the discussion Total Quality Management, Vol 6, Nos 5&6, pp. 487-495. Boshoff, C. & Mels, G. (1995). A Causal Model To Evaluate The Relationship Among Supervision, Role Stress, Organizational Commitment and Internal Service Quality. European Journal of Marketing, 292, pp. 23-42. Bowers, D. G. & Franklin J. L. (1994). Survey-Guided Development: Using Human Resources Measurement in Organizational Change. Journal of Contemporary Business 1, No. 3, pp.43 -55. Burke. W. W. (1994). Organization Development. : Addison Wesley Publishing New York. Burnes, B. (1998). Recipes for Organizational Effectiveness. Career Development International, Vol 3, Issue 3, pp. 365-477. Cameron, K. (1980). Critical Questions in Assessing Orrranizational Effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 9:2, pp.66-80. Clifford, G.P. & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Developing Self-Directed Team. Management Decision, Vol 36, Issue 2, pp.77-84. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York, pp. 235. Dahlgaard, J.J., Kristensen, K. & Kanji, G. K. (1995). Total Quality Management and Education. Total Quality Management, Vol 6, Nos 5&6, pp.445-455. Davies, B. & Ellison, L. (1997). Teachers's Perceptions of School Quality and Effectiveness: Improving school using staff attitude survey. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol II , Issue 5, pp.222-228. Denton, D.K. (1996) . Four Simple Rules For Leading Change. Empowerment in Organizations, 04:4, pp. 5-9. Dixon, N. M. (1998). The Responsibilities of Members In An Organization That Is Learning. The Learning Organization, 05:4, pp. 161 - 167. Dyer, W. (1981). Selecting An Intervention for Orzanizational Change. Training and Development Journal, April, pp. 62 - 68. Elmuti, D. (1997). Self-managed Work Teams Approach: Creative Management Tool Or a Fad?. Management Decision, Vol 35, No3, pp.233-239. Elmuti, D. & AIDiab,T.F. (1995)Improving Quality and Organizational Effectiveness Go hand In Hand Through Deminn's Management System. Journal of Business Strategies, Spring, No 1 , pp. 86-98. Fordyce, J.K. & Weil, R. (l979). Methods for Finding Out What's Going On. Addison Wesley Publishing. Reading. Goodman, P.S. & Pening, J.M. (1980). Critical Issues in Assessing Organizational Effectiveness. Wiley-Interscience, New York. Golembiewskl, Robert T., Proehl. Carl W & Smk, D. (1982). Estimating the Success of OD applications. Training & Development Journal, 36, pp. 86 - 95. Grubb, I. M., Silvestro, N. W. & Ward, D. F. (1994). Stop the organization - I Want To Change It! Industrial and Commercial Training, vol 26, issue 4, pp. 15-21 . Hamid, A. (1994). Achieving Excellence in Service Organisations. Malaysian Management Review. Vol 7, pp. 3 - 14. Hanna, D. P. (1988). Desiming Organizations for High Performance. Addison Wesley Publishing, New York. Kaufinan, R. (1981). Determining and Diagnosing Organizational Needs. Group & Organization Studies, September, pp. 3 12 - 322. Hussey, D. E. (1995). How To Manage Ornanisational Change. Kogan Page, London. Lammers, T. (1992). The Essential of employee Survey. Inc. Magazine Goldhirsh Publishing, Vol 14, No 13. pp. 159-181. Lippitt, G. L. (1978). Transition Management - Coping. Organization Development in Public Administration, pp. 189 -203. Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H. & Winokur, D. (1994). Total Quality Management in the University: A quality code of honor. Total Quality Management, Vol 5, No 6, pp. 375-390. Medsker, H. & Higgs, A.C. (1993). Relationship Between work Group Characteristics And Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Group. Personnel Psychology, Vol 46, Winter, pp.823-8.50. Nadler, D. A. (1977). Feedback and Organization Development: Using Data Based Methods. Addison Wesley Publishing, New York. Oldroyd, R. (1995). Staff Development and Appraisal In an Old University Library. Librarian Career development, 032, pp. 13-16. Osei, I. (1996). Professional Staff Development in Academic Libraries. Librarian Career Development, 04:4, pp.3 1-36. Osman, I. (1997). Perkembangan Oruanisasi. Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur. Peter, H. W. (1994). Developing Managers for Social Change. Journal of Management Development. Vol 3, pp. 16 - 27. Reynolds, A., Sambrook, S. & Steward, J. (1997). Dictionarv of HRM. Gower Publishing, London. Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behaviour. Prentice Hall International Inc., San Diego. Ruddock, J., Chaplain, R. & Wallace, G. (1995). School Improvement: What Can Pupils Tell Us?. David Fulton, London. Santhanaraj, S. (1990). The Philips' Approach to Management and Organisation Development. Journal of Management Development. Vol 9, pp. I6 - 28. Sashkin, M. & Burke: W.W. (1987). Organization Development in the 1980s. Journal Of Management, Vol 13, No 2, pp.393-417. Scott, C. D.& Jaffe, D. T. (1991) Managing Organisational Change. Kogan Page London. Schemerhorn, J. (1989). Management for Productivity, 3rd ed. Wiley, Illinois. Sherwood, J. J. (1971). An Introduction to Oraganization Development.Organization Development in Public Administration, pp. 205 - 209. Swee, V. & Kleiner, B.H. (1998) Managing and Changing Mistrustful Cultures. Industrial & Commercial Training, 302, pp. 66-70. Thomson T.& Bums J.(1998).Employee Survey Design Guide:How to ensure your survey is a driver of change. Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 45 - 53. Thornhill, A., Lewis, P. & Saunders, N. K. (1996). The Roie of Employee Communication In Achieving Commitment and Quality In Higher Education. Quality Assurance In education, Vol 4, Issue 1 , pp. 12-20. Townsend, T. (1996). A Measured Commitment To Change. Managing school Today, Vol 5, No 9, June/July. Tudor, D., Trumble, R. R. & Diaz, J.J. (1996). Work Teams: Why Do They Often Failed?. Sam Advanced Management Journal, Autumn, pp.31-35. Waclawski, J.(1996). Using Organizational Survey Result to Improve Organizational Performance. Managing Service quality, Vol 6, Issue 4, pp. 53-56. Weil R.& Fordyce J. K. (1979). Managing With People. Addison Wesley Publishing, New York, pp. 143 - 158.