The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence creative behavior among Malaysian researchers. Specifically, it investigated the mediating effect of work motivation on the relationships between the contextual factors, namely stressors, autonomy, culture, reward and sup...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Daratul Ambia, Che Mit
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2017
Subjects:	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/1/s91507_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/2/s91507_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.7272
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Mohd Shamsudin, Faridahwati Subramaniam, Chandrakantan Che Razak, Razli
topic	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment
spellingShingle	HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management Employment Daratul Ambia, Che Mit The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
description	The main purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence creative behavior among Malaysian researchers. Specifically, it investigated the mediating effect of work motivation on the relationships between the contextual factors, namely stressors, autonomy, culture, reward and supervisory style on creative behavior; the effect of work motivation on creative behavior; and the moderating effect of job involvement on the relationships between stressors, autonomy, culture, reward and supervisory style, and work motivation. Creativity is considered as the seed of innovation, where innovativeness has been considered as one of the fundamentals for organizational competitiveness. Acknowledging the importance of creative behavior on innovation, this study was carried out to investigate its predictors, and to include work motivation as the mediating factor and job involvement as the moderating variable between the contextual factors and work motivation. Accordingly, this study was based on the self-determination theory (SDT) and the organizational support theory (OST) to position the possible relationships between the variables in the research framework. A total of 201 researchers, representing a response rate of 40.8%, participated in this study. Data were collected via questionnaires. PLS-SEM was used to analyze the data and test the hypotheses. This study found that the level of creative behavior among the researchers was high. Statistical results showed that the relationship between stressors, work motivation, creative behavior as well as the relationship between autonomy, work motivation and creative behavior were supported. Work motivation was also found to be positively related to creative behavior. Empirical support was also found for the moderating effect of job involvement on the relationships between stressors and supervisory styles and work motivation. The theoretical and practical implications alongside recommendations for future research are discussed.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	other
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Daratul Ambia, Che Mit
author_facet	Daratul Ambia, Che Mit
author_sort	Daratul Ambia, Che Mit
title	The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
title_short	The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
title_full	The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
title_fullStr	The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
title_full_unstemmed	The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
title_sort	roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2017
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/1/s91507_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/2/s91507_02.pdf
_version_	1747828185358139392
spelling	my-uum-etd.72722021-05-09T02:23:41Z The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior 2017 Daratul Ambia, Che Mit Mohd Shamsudin, Faridahwati Subramaniam, Chandrakantan Che Razak, Razli Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment The main purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence creative behavior among Malaysian researchers. Specifically, it investigated the mediating effect of work motivation on the relationships between the contextual factors, namely stressors, autonomy, culture, reward and supervisory style on creative behavior; the effect of work motivation on creative behavior; and the moderating effect of job involvement on the relationships between stressors, autonomy, culture, reward and supervisory style, and work motivation. Creativity is considered as the seed of innovation, where innovativeness has been considered as one of the fundamentals for organizational competitiveness. Acknowledging the importance of creative behavior on innovation, this study was carried out to investigate its predictors, and to include work motivation as the mediating factor and job involvement as the moderating variable between the contextual factors and work motivation. Accordingly, this study was based on the self-determination theory (SDT) and the organizational support theory (OST) to position the possible relationships between the variables in the research framework. A total of 201 researchers, representing a response rate of 40.8%, participated in this study. Data were collected via questionnaires. PLS-SEM was used to analyze the data and test the hypotheses. This study found that the level of creative behavior among the researchers was high. Statistical results showed that the relationship between stressors, work motivation, creative behavior as well as the relationship between autonomy, work motivation and creative behavior were supported. Work motivation was also found to be positively related to creative behavior. Empirical support was also found for the moderating effect of job involvement on the relationships between stressors and supervisory styles and work motivation. The theoretical and practical implications alongside recommendations for future research are discussed. 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/1/s91507_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7272/2/s91507_02.pdf text eng public other doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M . A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs . Decision sciences, 27(1) , 23-56. Akter, S., D' Ambra, J. & Pradeep, R. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models: the role of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index. Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2011 pp. 1-7). Detroit, USA. Association for Information Systems. Allridge, M.R. & Nilan, K. J. (2000). 3M's leadership competency model : An internally developed solution. Human Resource Management, 39 (2-3), 133-136. Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221-233. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357- 377. Amabile, T.M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393-399. Amabile, T. M. (1988) . A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummimngs (Eds .), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10th Ed. (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, Conn.: J.A.I. Press. Amabile, T.M. (1994). The delicate balance in managing for creativity, R & D Innovator, 3, 1-9. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Conte xt. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press Inc. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy, Journal of Creative Behavior, 31 (l) 18-26. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184 . Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., Brackfield, S. C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6-21. Amabile, T. M. & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessy, B. A. & Tighe, E. M. (1994), The Work Environment Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. Amabile, T. M. & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 1 57-183. Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B. & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(l), 5-32. Anderson J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 732-740 Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for workgroup innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258. Ansari, M., Lee, B. B., and Aafaqi, R. (2007). LMX and work outcomes: The mediating role of delegation in the Malaysian business context. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6. Arad, S., Hanson, M.A. & Schneider, R. J. (1997). A framework of the study of the relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Journal a/Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42-59. Ashkanasy, N., Broadfoot, L., & Faulkus, S. (2000j. Questionnaire measures of organizational culture. In Ashkanasy, N., Wilderom, C. & Peterson, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10). 2045-2068. Baer, M., 2012. Putting creativity to work: the implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy Management Journal. 55(5), 1102-1119. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 1-40. Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W. & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Informotion Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50. Basadur, M., Pringle, P., & Taggar, S. (1995). Improving the reliability of three new scales which measure three new divergent thinking attitudes related to organizational creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 75-111. Basset-Jones, N. & Llyod, G. C. (2005), Does Herzberg's motivation theory have staying power? Journal of Management Development, 12(10), 929-943. Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309. Beutell, N. & Greenhaus, J. (1986). Balancing acts: work-family conflict and the dual Career couple. Not As Far As You Think: The Realities of Working Women. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 149-62. Beehr, T. A., Jex , S. M., Stacy, B. A. and Mur ray, M.A. (2000), Work stressors and coworkers support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(4), pp. 391-405. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489-520. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers. Blau, G. J. & Boal, K. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 288-300. Boden, M. A. (1992). Understanding creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(3), 213-217. Bohlander, G. & Snell, S. (2004). Managing human resources. 13ᵀᴴ Ed. Ohio: South-Western Publishings . Borman, W. C. (1987). Personal constructs, performance schemata, and "folk theories" of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(3), 307-322. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Explaining the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman Ws.), Personnel selection in organirations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. Brown S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235-255. Brown, S. P., Jones, E. & Leigh, T. W. (2005). The attenuating effect of the role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 972-979. Buttner, E. H. Gryskiewicz , N. & Hidore, S. C. (1999). The relationships between styles of creativity and managerial skills assessment, British Journal of Management, l0(3), 228-238. Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological bulletin, 138(4), 809. Byron, K., Khazanchi, S. & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models, Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201-212. Cabra, J. F., & Uribe-Larach, D. (2013). Creative Behavior. In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 266-271). Springer New York. Campbell, D.T., and Fisk, D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin,. 56:81-105, 1959. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B. & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499-506. Caimeli, A. (2003). The relationship between emotional intelligence and work attitudes, behavior, and out comes: An examination among senior managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(8), 788-813. Carson, S., Peterson, J.B. & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high achieving normative population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499.-506. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L. and Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research: qualitative and Quantitative Methods. 3rd Edition. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons. Chan, Y. H. (2003). A nomological network approach to the study of antecedents, moderator, mediators and outcomes of Psychological Empowerment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Memphis. Chandran, V. G. R., Sundram, V. P. K., & Santhidran, S. (2014). lnnovation systems in Malaysia: a perspective of university-industry R&D collaboration. Al & society, 29(3), 435-444. Chen, M. & Kaufmann, G. (2008). Employee creativity and R & D: A critical review, Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 71-76. Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I. S., Wang, J., & Stoverink, A C. (2017). A bigger piece of the pie: The relative importance of affiliative and change-oriented citizenship and task performance in predicting overall job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1). 97-l07. Chin, W.W. (2010). How to write up and report RLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Clapham, M. M. (2000). Employee creativity: The role of leadership. Academy of Management Executive. 14(3), 138-139. Coelho, F., Augusto, M., & Lages, L. F. (2011). Contextual factors and the creativity of frontline employees: The mediating effects of role stress and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 31-45. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS quarterly, 145-158. Cummings, A. (1965), Organizational climate for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal. 8(3), 220-227. Cummings, A. & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: managing work context for high potential employee . California Management Review, 40 (1), 22-38. Cummings, L. L., Hinton, B. L. & Gobdel, B. G., (1975). Creative behavior as a function of task environment: Impact of objectives, procedures and control. Academy of Management Journal, 18 (3), 489-499. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power of Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrenre Erlbaum. Cook, C. W. & Hunsaker, P. L. (2001). Management and Organizational Behavior. 3rd Ed. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill. Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & O' Driscoll, M.P. (2001). Organizational stress: Review and critique, California: Sage. Cooper , D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business Research Methods (7ᵀᴴ ed.). New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Cox, C. (1926). Genetic studies of genius in The Early Mental Traits of 300 geniuses (Vol. II), Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Creative Productivity Index: Analyzing Creativity and Innovation in Asia (2014). The Economist Intelligence Unit for the Asian Development Bank. Crapanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. Daniels, S., Wimalasiri, V., Cheyne, and A., Story, V. (2011). Linking the demands control-support model to innovation: the moderating role of personal initiative on the generation and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 4 (3), 581- 598. Danserea u, F., Graen, G. & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Performance and Human Behavior, 13, 46-78. Dawson, K. M., O'Brien , K. E., & Beehr, T. A. (2015)'. The role of hindrance stressors in the job demand-control- support model of occupational stress: A proposed theory revision. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 24, 123-140. Deal, T. & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate culture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M., 91980). The emprical exploration of intrinsic motivation processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of, autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social P1sychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P. & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work-organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580-590. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. Dellas, M., & Gaier, E.L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73 (1), 55-73. Devan, J. & Tewari, P. S. (2001). Brains abroad. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 51-60. Devlooa, T., Anseela, F., De Beucke]aerab, A. & Salanovac, M. (2015): Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behavior, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology; 24(4); 1-14. DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 711-737). New York: Cambridge University Press. DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, article 762. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00762 DeYoung, C. G. (2014). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 4, pp. 369-399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association . Dickey, C. A., Kamal, A., Lundgren, K., Klosak, N., Bailey, R. M., Dunmore, J., & Patterson, C. (2007). The high-affinity HSP90-CHIP complex recognizes and selectively degrades phospborylated tau client proteins . The Journal of clinical investigation, 117(3), 648-658. Oiefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 93-108. Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539- 559. Dobni, C. B., & Luffman, G. (2003). Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance. Strategic management journal, 24(6), 577-585. Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(2), 99-117. Eighth Malaysian Plan (2004). Ministry of Finance : Kuala Lumpur. Eisenberger, R. & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 652 663. Eisenberger, R. & Armeli, S. (1998). Can the promise of reward increase creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 704-714. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied A Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. Eisenberger , R. & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of rewards on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728-741. Eisenberger, R. & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1116-1127. Egan, T. M. (2005). Factors influencing creativity in the workplace: an examination of quantitative empirical research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7 (2), 160-l81. Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1998). Leadership style, social climate and organizational outcomes: A study of a Swedish Universiti College. Creativity and Innovation Management, 7(3), 126-130. Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010). Creativity: The influence of cultural, social, and work contexts. Management and Organization Review, 6(3), 351-370. Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P. & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (50), 618-630. Fagerlind, A. C., Gustavsson, M., Johansson, 0., & Ekberg, K. (2013). Experience of work-related flow: does high decision latitude enhance benefits gained from job resources?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 161-170. Farr, J. L. (1995). Does feedback enhance or inhibit creativity? In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia, (Eds). Creative Action in Organization: Ivory Tower Visions and Real World Voices, (pp. 137-141) London: Sage Publications. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & and Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the World : A Framework for the Study of Creativity. London: Praeger. Fleenor, J. W. & Taylor, S. (2003). The assessment of creativity. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment. In Jay C. Thomas & Michael Hersen (Eds.). Organizational Assesment, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.). (1995). Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices. Sage Publications. Foxall, G. R. & Hackett, P.M. (1994). Styles of Managerial Creativity: a Comparison of adaption-innovation in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States, British Journal of Management, 6(2), 85-100. Manual, F. (2004). A summary of the Frascati manual. Main definitions and conventions for the measurement of research and experimental development (R&D). OCDE/GD (94), 84. Frone, M. R., Russell, M. & Cooper, M. L. (1995). Job stressors, job involvement, And employee health: A test of identity theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(1), 1-11. Gagne, M. (2000). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in the internalization of autonomous regulation for prosocial behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Rochester. Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation m prosocial behavior engagement, Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223. Gagne, M. & Deci, E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. Gay, L. R. & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management. NY: Macmillan Publishing Company. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M.-C. 2000. "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (4:7), pp. 1-70. Giese , T. D., & Weisenberger, T. M. (1982). Product manager in perspective. Journal of Business Research, 10(3), 267-277. Gelade, G. (1995). Creative style and divergent production. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(1), 36-53. George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524. George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227-271. Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611-625. Glaveanu, V. P., & Wagoner, B. (2016). Memory and creativity: Historical and conceptual intersections. In Psychology as the Science of Human Being (pp. 67-83). Springer Internat ional Publishing. Goldsmith, R. E. & Matherly, T. A. (1986). Seeking simpler solutions: Assimilators and explorer, adaptors and innovators. The Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 149-155. Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398-1405. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 161-178. Graen G. & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L.L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (9th Ed.), 175-208, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT. Grandey, A. A., & Crapanzano, R. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work-family conflict and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5-1(2), 350-370. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96. Greguras, G. J. & Diefendorf J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee attitudes and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465-477. Guo, B., Aveyard, P., Fielding, A., & Sutton, S. (2008). Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of the Decisional Balance Scale of the Transtheoretical Model using the Multi-Trait Multi-Method approach. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 22(2). 288.. Hackman, .I. R. & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph. 55(3), 259-286. Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Hair, J. F. Jr. Money A.H., Samouel P. & Page, M. (2003). Research methods for business New Jersey: Wiley & Sons Inc. Halbeleben, J. R. B., Novicevic M. M., Harvey M. G. & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly 14(4-5), 433-454. Hammedi, W., van Riel A., & Sasovova, Z. (2011). Antece dents and consequences of reflexivity in new product idea screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(5), 662-679. Harper, S. C. (2001). The Forward-Focused Organization: Visionary Thinking and Breakthrough Leadership to Create Your Company's Future, American Management Association: New York. Harris, E. G., Artis, A. B., Walters J. H:, & Licata J. W. (2006). Role stressors, service worker job resourcefulness, and job outcomes: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Research 59(4), 407-415. Hartline M. D., & Ferrell, 0. C. (1996). The management of customer-contac service employees: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Marketing, 52-70. Hayes. A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs, 76(4), 408-420. Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive process in creativity In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.) Handbook of Creativity. New York: Plenum. 53- 75. Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4) 295-306. Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2) 89-10I. Helson R. Agronick, G. & Roberts, B. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6) 1173-1183. Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Creative behavior, motivation, environment and culture: The building of a systems model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 194-210. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Hirst, G., Van KJ1ippenberg, D. & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation team learning behavior and individual creativity. Academy of management journal 52(2), 280-293 . Hofstede G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hofstede G., Neuijen, B., Obay, D. D. & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2), pp: 286-316. Holmquist, C. & Better, H. (2004). Identifying cultural bases in different organizational context: Case studies of three Swedish multinational companies. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 4(3) 355-369. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least square. (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal 195-204. Igbaria, M., Parasurarnan, S.. & Badawy, M. K. (1994). Work experience job Involvement, and quality of work life among information systems personnel. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 18(2) 175-201. Innovation Survey (2006). (MASTIC). Ismail, M. (2003). Creative climate and learning organization factors: their contribution towards innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26(8), 639-654. Jaussi, K. S. & Dionne, S. D. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 475-498. Jabri, M. (1991). The development of conceptual independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(4), 975-983. Jaskyte, K. & Kisieliene, A. (2006). Organizational innovation: A comparison of nonprofit human-service organizations in Lithuania and the United States. International Social Work, 49(2), 165-176. Jin, N. C. (2004). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57(5), 531-552. Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J. & Avolio, B. M. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly 14 (4-5), 499-524. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4). 692-724. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D. & Rosenthal. R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change master: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster. Kanter R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummimngs (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10th Ed. (pp. 169-211). Greenwich, Conn.: J.A.I. Press. Kanungo, R. N. (1983). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349. Kapur, R. L., Subramanyam, S. & Shah, A. (1997). Creativity in Indian Science. Psychology and Developing Societies 9(2); Sage Publications New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London:pp 161-187 Katz, H. (2001). The relationship of intrinsic motivation, cognitive style, and tolerance of ambiguity and creativity in scientists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University. Katzell R. A & Thompson, D.E. (1990). Work motivation: theory and practice. American Psychologist, 45 (2) 144-153. Kanungo R. (1982). Work alientation: An integrative approachg, New York: Praeger. Kim, J. (2000). A study of relationships among work motivation, problem-solving style, leadership style, and team climate on creative behavior in the South Korean workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia. Kim, B. C. P., Murrmarnn, S. K. and Lee G., (2009). "Moderati g effects or gender and organizational level between role stress and job satisfaction among hotel employees•'. lnternational Journal of Hospitality Management. 28(4): 612-619. Kirton M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5). 622-629. Kirton, M. J. (1989). A theory of cognitive style. In M. J. Kirton (ED.). Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving (pp.1-36). London: Routledge. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal 37(3) 656-669. Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (1998). Organizational Behavior. 4th Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Koestler, A (1964). The Act of Creation. New York: Dell. Koestle r, A. (1989). The Act of reation, Reading: Arkana Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining the sample size for research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford M. T. Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management. 43(6) 1854-1884 . Lazarus R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational- relational theory of emotions. American Psychologists, 46(8) pp. 819-834. Lee, C. (2004). The determinants of innovation in the Malaysian manufacturing sector, an econometric analysis at the firm level. Unpublished Report: University Malaya: Kuala Lumpur. Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M.. & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management 42(8) 1095-1104. Lepine, J. A., Podakoff: N. P. & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5) 764-775. Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administration the Science Quarterly, 370-390. Lim, H.A. (2004). From human resource to human capital. Symbiosis. June-Sept, 5-10. Lin, M. J., Chen C. Chen C. & Lai, F. (2010), A study on the relationship among time pressure, job involvement, routinisation, creativity and turnover intentions. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 8(12), 184-196. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. Dunnette (Eel.), Handbook of Individual and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1350), Chicago: Rand McNally Prentice Hall. Locke, E. A. Latham, G. P. & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 23-39. Lopez-Claros Altinger, Blanke, Drezniek, & Mia (2007). Competitiveness Report. Luecher. R., Barthelmess, P. Y. Z., Kim, S. Y., Richter, U. H., & Mittag, M. (2016). Conceptualizing Creativity: General and Cultural Biases in Gough's Creative Personality Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior. Macoulicles. G.A. & Saunders, C. (2006). PLS: a silver bullet? MIS Quarterly 30(2), ii-ix.

The roles of work motivation and job involvement on the relationship between contextual factors and creative behavior

Similar Items