Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model

Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model

Nowadays, it is almost impossible for businesses to craft competitive edges by pulling all in-house resources and capabilities alone. Innovation now demands a critical uplifting of a new dimension widely known as “open innovation”. Open innovation has been a main research focus and has mainly been t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2017
Subjects:
T Technology (General)
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/1/s95066_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/2/s95066_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.7383
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Yusoff, Rushami Zien
Thi, Lip Sam
Saad, Rohaizah
topic T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi
Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
description Nowadays, it is almost impossible for businesses to craft competitive edges by pulling all in-house resources and capabilities alone. Innovation now demands a critical uplifting of a new dimension widely known as “open innovation”. Open innovation has been a main research focus and has mainly been targeted to large organizations where it have been proven to increase the organizations performance. As knowledge no longer resides within one particular industry alone, previous scholars have underlined the importance of embracing open innovation to SMEs to transform innovation processes. This study was constructed with the intention to look at the placement of open innovation among SMEs, specifically in the Malaysian triple-helix context. This study is developed to a threfold perspectives. Perspective I investigates the relationships of technology exploration, exploitation towards open innovation adoption and to investigate the mediating influence of trust on technology exploration and exploitation towards open innovation adoption. Perspective II investigates the success factors and challenges for the organizations to achieve the difficulty levels of the constructs in the light of open innovation; while Perspective III profiles the organizations based on the constructs involved. A total of 72 Malaysian SMEs involved in a triple helix project were involved in this study. The data collection was gathered through a likert-scale instrument. Two major analyses were used. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and the Rasch Measurement were used to achieve the targeted perspectives. Result from Perspective I shows that technology exploration is significantly related to open innovation adoption and trust has also been proven to have a significant mediating relationship between technology exploration and open innovation adoption. Conversely, technology exploitation has proven insignificant relationship with open innovation adoption and has therefore resulted to trust having a non-significant mediating effect to the relationship of technology exploitation and open innovation adoption. Perspective II resulted to the division between success factors and challenges items while Perspective III indicated six distinct organizations profiles. Discussions of the study are based on latent characteristics shared by respective group. The findings of this study will assist SMEs; government; research bodies; industry players; and policy makers to understand what motivates SMEs to adopt open innovation in the light of their ability level in dealing with various difficulties in technology exploration, exploitation and trust towards triple helices.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi
author_facet Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi
author_sort Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi
title Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
title_short Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
title_full Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
title_fullStr Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
title_full_unstemmed Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model
title_sort open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among smes and helices in triple helix model
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2017
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/1/s95066_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/2/s95066_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828210312151040
spelling my-uum-etd.73832021-08-18T07:33:16Z Open innovation adoption: the role of technology exploration, technology exploitation and trust among SMEs and helices in triple helix model 2017 Siti Noratisah, Mohd Nafi Yusoff, Rushami Zien Thi, Lip Sam Saad, Rohaizah Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business T Technology (General) Nowadays, it is almost impossible for businesses to craft competitive edges by pulling all in-house resources and capabilities alone. Innovation now demands a critical uplifting of a new dimension widely known as “open innovation”. Open innovation has been a main research focus and has mainly been targeted to large organizations where it have been proven to increase the organizations performance. As knowledge no longer resides within one particular industry alone, previous scholars have underlined the importance of embracing open innovation to SMEs to transform innovation processes. This study was constructed with the intention to look at the placement of open innovation among SMEs, specifically in the Malaysian triple-helix context. This study is developed to a threfold perspectives. Perspective I investigates the relationships of technology exploration, exploitation towards open innovation adoption and to investigate the mediating influence of trust on technology exploration and exploitation towards open innovation adoption. Perspective II investigates the success factors and challenges for the organizations to achieve the difficulty levels of the constructs in the light of open innovation; while Perspective III profiles the organizations based on the constructs involved. A total of 72 Malaysian SMEs involved in a triple helix project were involved in this study. The data collection was gathered through a likert-scale instrument. Two major analyses were used. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and the Rasch Measurement were used to achieve the targeted perspectives. Result from Perspective I shows that technology exploration is significantly related to open innovation adoption and trust has also been proven to have a significant mediating relationship between technology exploration and open innovation adoption. Conversely, technology exploitation has proven insignificant relationship with open innovation adoption and has therefore resulted to trust having a non-significant mediating effect to the relationship of technology exploitation and open innovation adoption. Perspective II resulted to the division between success factors and challenges items while Perspective III indicated six distinct organizations profiles. Discussions of the study are based on latent characteristics shared by respective group. The findings of this study will assist SMEs; government; research bodies; industry players; and policy makers to understand what motivates SMEs to adopt open innovation in the light of their ability level in dealing with various difficulties in technology exploration, exploitation and trust towards triple helices. 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/1/s95066_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7383/2/s95066_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abouzeedan, A., & Hedner, T. (2012). Organization structure theories and open innovation paradigm. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 6–27. http://doi.org/10.1108/20425941211223598 Abu El-Ella, N., Pinkwart, A., & Bessant, J. (2014). Employee Involvement in Open Innovation The Role of New Technologies, External Employees and Trust Issues The Role of New Technologies, External Employees and Trust Issues. Abu El‐ Ella, N., John, B., & Andreas, P. (2015). Revisiting the Honorable Merchant: The Reshaped Role of Trust in Open Innovation. Thunderbird International Business Review. http://doi.org/10.1002/tie Abulrub, A.-H. G., & Lee, J. (2012). Open innovation management: challenges and prospects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 130–138. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.017 Adams, B. D., Waldherr, S., Sartori, J., & Adams, B. D. (2008). Trust in Teams Scale Trust in Leaders Scale Manual for Administration and Analyses. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ahmad, N. H., & Seet, P. (2009). Dissecting behaviours associated with business failure: A qualitative study of SME owners in Malaysia and Australia. Asian Social Science, 5, 98–104. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n9p98 Ahn, J. M., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (2013). Open innovation : an approach for enhancing performance in innovative SMEs, 1–14. Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. J. (2009). Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 71–77. Allied Consultant Europe. (2012). A comprehensive guide to “ Efficient Open Innovation ” Benefits and challenges-A European perspective. Amundsen, O., Aasen, T. M., Gressgård, L. J., & Hansen, K. (2014). Preparing organisations for employee-driven open innovation. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 9(1), 24–35. Anderson, J., & Narus, J. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58. http://doi.org/10.2307/1252172 Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814 Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms. Medical Care, 42(1), 1–7. Antal, J. (2003). Fit Indices for the Rasch Model. The Ohio State University. Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137. Arnkil, R. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix: Helix Outlining user-oriented innovation models. Arnold, H., Erner, M., Möckel, P., & Schläffer, C. (2010). Enterprise Architecture in Innovation Implementation. In Applied Technology and Innovation Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg., 132–144. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for Technology and their Implications for Corporate Strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419–451. http://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.2.419 Arvanitis, S., Wörter, M., Mohnen, P., & Lokshin, B. (2013). Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation--A comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data (No. 325). Atwell, R. C., Schulte, L. a., & Westphal, L. M. (2009). Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the U.S. Corn Belt. Ecology and Society, 14(1). http://doi.org/Artn 30 Aurifeille, J., & Medlin, C. J. (2009). Dimensions of Inter-Firm Trust: Benevolence and Credibility. In Trust, Globalisation and market Expansion (pp. 9–22). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Azrilah, A. A. (2010). Rasch model fundamentals: Scale construct and measurement structure. Kuala Lumpur: Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Azwadi Ali. (2010). The Mediating Role of Attitudes in Using Investor Relations Websites. October. Babalola, S. S., & Omobowale, A. O. (2012). The role of trust , innovation and knowledge management in entrepreneurial survival strategies : a study of selected cybercafé micro-entrepreneurs in Ibadan, Nigeria. Human and Social Science, 4(2), 128–136. Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Cengage, 2010 (12th ed., Vol. 5th). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage. Bakker, M., Leenders, R. T. A. J., Gabbay, S. M., Kratzer, J., & Engelen, J. M. L. Van. (2006). Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects. The Learning Organization, 13(6), 594–605. http://doi.org/10.1108/09696470610705479 Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, a. (2002). Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76. http://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105 Battisti, F. De, Nicolini, G., & Salini, S. (2010). The Rasch Model in Customer Satisfaction Survey Data. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 7(1), 15–34. Beckett, R. C., & Jones, M. (2012). Collaborative network success and the variable nature of trust. Production Planning & Control, 23(4), 240–251. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.627654 Belussi, F., Sammarra, A., & Rita Sedita, S. (2008). Managing Long Distance and Localized Learning in the Emilia Romagna Life Science Cluster. European Planning Studies. http://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802049273 Bengtsson, L., Lakemond, N., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Pellegrini, L., & Tell, F. (2015). Open to a Select Few? Matching Partners and Knowledge Content for Open Innovation Performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 72–86. http://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12098 Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation , Exploration , the Productivity Process Management : Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. http://doi.org/10.2307/30040711 Berenson, M. L., Levine, D. M., & Krehbiel, T. C. (2011). Basic Business Statistics Concepts and Application (12 ed). Pearson. BERNAMA. (2011, October 25). Go For Open Innovation Model, Malaysian Firms Urged. BERNAMA. (2013, August 14). Mimos’ Open Innovation Platform to boost growth of local ICT industry. Bews, N., & Martins, N. (2002). An evaluation of the facilitators of trustworthiness. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 14–19. http://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.70 Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., & Galati, F. (2012). The adoption of open innovation within the telecommunication industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 27–54. http://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211192825 Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2016a). Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(8), 869–885. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1180353 Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2016b). Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(8), 869–885. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1180353 Blau, P. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., & Seppänen, R. (2005). Playing the collaboration game right - Balancing trust and contracting. Technovation, 25(5), 497–504.http://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation.2004.09.001 Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press. Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4 Borgers, M., Radziwon, A., & Billberg, A. (2014). Open innovation in SMEs, (August), 1–31. http://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311326725 Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information System, 4, 205–225. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(03)00026-5 Brattström, A., Löfsten, H., & Richtnér, A. (2012). Creativity, trust and systematic processes in product development. Research Policy, 41(4), 743–755. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.003 Brink, T., & Madsen, S. O. (2016). The triple helix frame for small- and mediumsized enterprises for innovation and development of offshore wind energy. Triple Helix, 3(1), 4. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-016-0035-8 Brunswicker, S., & Van de Vrande, V. (2014). Exploring open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. (H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West, Eds.)New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263. http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12120 Bryant, P. T., & Bryant, P. T. (2014). Exploration and Exploitation in Early Stage Ventures and SMEs Article information : In Exploration and Exploitation in Early Stage Ventures and SMEs, 15–37. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-067X201414 Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods. Management Learning (3rd ed). Oxford university press. http://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028044 Bulu, S. T., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Communication Behaviors and Trust in Collaborative Online Teams. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 132–147. Burcharth, A. L. D. A., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149–161. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013. 11.007 Burrus, D. (2013). Creativity and Innovation: Your Keys to a Successful Organization. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, 544. http://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526.32.1.54 Carlo, J. L., Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G. M. (2012). A Knowledge -Based Model Of Radical Innovation In Small Software Firms. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 865–895. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 657–668. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0491-4 Chen, J. S., & Tsou, H. T. (2012). Performance effects of IT capability, service process innovation, and the mediating role of customer service. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(1), 71–94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.09.007 Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 Chesbrough, H. (2011). Bringing Open Innovation to Services. Mit Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85+. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503257028 Chesbrough, H. (2012a). Open Innovation: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27. http://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5504085 Chesbrough, H. (2012b). Open innovation: where we’ve been and where we’re going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27. Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicke, S. (2013). Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Managing Open Innovation Technologies, 215–236. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_14 Chesbrough, H. W. (2002). Making Sense of Corporate Venture Capital. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 90–99. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8242-1_4 Chesbrough, H. W. (2017). The Future of Open Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 35–38. http://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.1003080 Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–77. http://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000755 Chesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00502.x Chesbrough, & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high technology: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236. Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R and D Management, 40(3), 292–299. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010. 00588.x Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009. 08.007 Chibucos, T. R., Leite, R. W., & Weis, D. L. (2004). Social exchange theory. Readings in Family Theory, 137–182. Chong, A. L., Abas, Z., & Voon, Y. S. (2013). Performance Measures of Strategic University-Industry Collaborations in Malaysia: Dyadic Multicases Approach. CREAM (Current Reserach in Malaysia), 2(1), 5–24. Choudhary, A. K., Harding, J., Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Lenny Koh, S. C., & Tiwari, M. K. (2013). Knowledge management and supporting tools for collaborative networks. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 1953–1957. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.758508 Ciesielska, M., & Iskoujina, Z. (2012). Trust as a success factor in open innovation. The case of Nokia and Gnome. Managing Dynamic Technology-Oriented Business: High-Tech Organizations and Workplaces. Information Science Reference, 11–29. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560. Conrad, K. J., Conrad, K. M., Dennis, M. L., Riley, B. B., Chan, Y., & Funk, R. (2009). Validation of the Crime and Violence Scale (CVS) to the Rasch Measurement Model , GAIN Methods Report 1 . 1. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2010). Business Research Methods. Social Research. Coras, E. L., & Tantau, A. D. (2014). Open Innovation – the Good , the Bad , the Uncertainties. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 14(1), 38–47. Cosh, A., & Zhang, J. J. (2012). Ambidexterity and Open Innovation in Small and Medium Sized Firms (SMEs). Open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence Conference Imperial College London, (June), 1–34. Costa e Silva, S., Bradley, F., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2012). Empirical test of the trust performance link in an international alliances context. International Business Review, 21(2), 293–306. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev. 2011.03.006 Costello, G. J., Donnellan, B., Gleeson, I., & Rochford, C. (2007). The triple helix, open innovation, and the DOI research agenda. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 235, 463–468. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_32 Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602 Crossan, M. (2003). Chris Argyris And Donald Schon ’ S Organizational Learning : There Is No Silver Bullet. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 38–39. D. Harrison McKnight. (2005). Trust in Information Technology. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management. Vol. 7 Management Information Systems (pp. 329–331). Daellenbach, U., & Davernport, S. J. (2004). Establishing trust during the formation of technology alliances. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(2), 187–202. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000019537. 61121.c3 Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points use? And experiment using 5 point 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 1–20. http://doi.org/Article de Jong, J. P. J., & Vermeulen, P. a. M. (2006). Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms: A Comparison Across Industries. International Small Business Journal, 24(6), 587–609. http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606069268 De Marchi, V., Di Maria, E., & Micelli, S. (2013). Environmental Strategies, Upgrading and Competitive Advantage in Global Value Chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 62–72. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1738 De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53). http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Dittrich, K., & Duysters, G. (2007). Networking as a means to strategy change: The case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 510–521. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00268.x Doroodian, M., Nizam, M., Rahman, A., Kamarulzaman, Y., & Muhamad, N. (2014).Designing and Validating a Model for Measuring Innovation Capacity Construct. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2014. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/ 576596 Dovey, K. (2009). The role of trust in innovation. The Learning Organization, 16(4), 311–325. http://doi.org/10.1108/09696470910960400 Doyle, A. (2015). COLLABORATING to Meet Workforce Challenges. Dyer, J., & Chu, W. (2003). The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.57.12806 Edelman, R. (2015). Edelman trust barometer: Executive summary. Emerson, R. M. (1962). JSTOR: American Sociological Review, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Feb., 1962), pp. 31-41. American Sociological Review. Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. Sociological Theories in Progress, 2, 58–57. Emerson, R. M. (2008). Social Exchange Theory Author (s): Richard M. Emerson Source: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 2 (1976), pp. 335-362 Published by : Annual Reviews Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946096, 2(1976), 335–362. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R & D and open innovation : exploring the phenomenon. R & DManagement, 39(4), 311–316. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x EPU. (2010). Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011-2015. Eric, K. (2006). Internal Research and Development Markets. Ettlinger, N. (2003). Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities, networks, and change in collaborative workplaces. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 145–171. http://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.145 Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation Of Incubators: Innovation As A Triple Helix Of University–Industry–Government Networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128. http://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781056 Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university industry-government relations. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 42, 293–337. http://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002 Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. Engineering (Vol. 42). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix---University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory For Knowledge Based Economic Development. Easst Review, 14(1), 14–19. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24, 2–5. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A., & Van Looy, B. (2008). Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1053–1078. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732527 Fawcett, S. E., Jones, S. L., & Fawcett, A. M. (2012). Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation. Business Horizons, 55(2), 163–178. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.004 Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813. Fisher, W. P. J. (2007). Rating Scale Instrument Quality Criteria. Fisher, W. P. J. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria, Rasch Measurement Transactions (Vol. 21). Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165–180. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242 Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey Research Methods. Applied social research methods series. Sage Publications. Gambetta, D. (2000). Can We Trust Trust?. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, 213–237. http://doi.org/10.1.1.24.5695 Garcia, R., & Calantone. (2002). A Critical Look At Technological Innovation Typology And Innovativeness Terminology :A Literature Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The Future of Open Innovation. R&D Management. R&D Management, 60(1), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010. Gassmann Gassmann, O. (2006). Editorial: Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R and D Management. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x Gassmann, O., & Bader, M. a. (2006). Intellectual Property Management in Inter-firm R&D collaborations. Institute of Technology Management University of St. Gallen, 123–140. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference, 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1.1.149.4843 Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x Gault, F. (2012). User innovation and the market. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 118–128. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs005 Gaur, A. S., Mukherjee, D., Gaur, S. S., & Schmid, F. (2011). Environmental and firm level influences on inter-organizational trust and SME performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1752–1781. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01011.x Gay, B. (2014). Open innovation, networking, and business model dynamics: the two sides. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 2. http://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-3-2 Gebauer, H., Worch, H., & Truffer, B. (2012). Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation. European Management Journal, 30(1), 57–73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.10.004 Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. ACM Sigmis Database, 33(3), 38–53. http://doi.org/10.1145/569905.569910 Ghili, S., Shams, H., & Tavana, M. (2011). Innovation or Imitation. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 2(3), 48–66. http://doi.org/10.4018/jissc.2011070104 Godoy, D., & Amandi, A. (2012). Enabling topic-level trust for collaborative information sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(8), 1065–1077. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0440-y Govindaraju, V. C., Ghapar, F. A., & Pandiyan, V. (2009). The role of collaboration, market and intellectual property rights awareness in university technology commercialization. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 6(4), 363–378. Granger, C. (2008). Rasch analysis is important to understand and use for measurement. Rasch Meas Trans, 21, 1122–1123. Graser, F., & Jansson, K. (2005). Towards performance measurement in virtual organizations. Collaborative Networks and Their Breeding Environments, pp 301-310. Green, K., & Frantom, C. (2002). Survey development and validation with the Rasch model. International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation, and Testing, 1–30. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x Grudzewski, W. M., Hejduk, I. K., & Sankowska, A. (2008). Trust Management - The New Way in The Information Society. Economics and Organization of Enterprise, 2(2), 2–8. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10061-008-0012-z Gulati, R. (1995). Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns : A Longitudinal Analysis. Jstor, 40(4), 619–652. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393756 Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. a. (2008). Interorganizational Trust, Governance Choice, and Exchange Performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–708. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0345 Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 66(133(2)), 662–676. Guo, G., Zhang, J., & Thalmann, D. (2014). Merging trust in collaborative filtering to alleviate data sparsity and cold start. Knowledge-Based Systems, 57, 57–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.007 Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496. http://doi.org/10.2307/3094239 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019 Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison Of Classical Test Theory And Item Response Theory And Their Applications To Test Development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38–47. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245426. 10853.30 Harman, H. H. (1961). Modern Factor Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(294), 444–446. http://doi.org/10.2307/2282293 Hasche, N., Linton, G., & Öberg, C. (2017). Trust in open innovation – the case of a med-tech start-up. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 31–49. http://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0111 Hashim, F. (2012). Challenges for the Internationalization of Smes and the Role of Government: the Case of Malaysia. Journal of International Business and Economy, 13(1), 97–122. Hattori, R. A., & Lapidus, T. (2004). Collaboration, trust and innovative change. Journal of Change Management, 4(2), 97–104. http://doi.org/10.1080/14697010320001549197 Haynes, P. (2009). Before Going Any Further With Social Capital : Eight Key Criticisms to Address Before Going Any Further With Social Capital. INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), 200902. Henkel, J. (2006). Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Research Policy, 35, 953–969. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.010 Hertzfeld, H., Link, A., & Vonortas, N. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838. Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2010). Leveraging Internal and External Experience: Exploration, Exploitation and R&D Project Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(November 2009), 734–748. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj Holgersson, M. (2012). Patent management in entrepreneurial SMEs: A literature review and an empirical study of innovation appropriation, patent propensity, and motives, 1–25. http://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012. 00700.x Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Hossain, M. (2013). Open innovation: so far and a way forward. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 30–41. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197782 Huff, A. S., Möslein, K. M., & Reichwald, R. (Eds. . (2013). Huff, A. S., Möslein, K. M., & Reichwald, R. (Eds.). (2013). Leading open innovation. MIT Press. Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010. 10.002 Hung, K. P., & Lin, C. K. (2013). More communication is not always better? The interplay between effective communication and interpersonal conflict in influencing satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1223–1232. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.002 Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y. H., Yang, B., Wu, C. M., & Kuo, Y. M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213–225. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.001 Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Puumalainen, K. (2007). Nature and dynamics of appropriability: Strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R & D Management, 37(2), 95–112. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310. 2007.00460.x Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). P & G ’ s New Innovation Model. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66. Hwang, J., Kim, E., & Kim, S. (2009). Factors affecting open technological innovation in open source software companies in Korea. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 279–290. http://doi.org/10.5172/impp.11.3.279 Ibrahim, M., & Ribbers, P. M. (2009). The impacts of competence-trust and openness-trust on interorganizational systems. European Journal of Information Systems. http://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.17 Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2012). Fostering radical innovations with open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(2), 212–231. http://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211220977 IPPTN. (2010). Triple Helix (University-Industry-Government) in Innovation and Commercialisation. IPPTN, 1–9. Irvoni, N., & Ishar, M. (2012). Students’ Perception towards Quality Library Service Using Rasch Measurement Model, 21–22. Ismail, K., Zaidi, W., Omar, W., Soehod, K., Senin, A. a, & Akhtar, C. S. (2010). Role of Innovation in SMEs Performance : A Case of Malaysian SMEs. Mathematical Method in Engineering and Economics, 145–149. Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Montgomery, D. B. (2004). Exploitation, Exploration, and Firm Performance: The Case of Small Manufacturing Firms in Japan. Jalonen, H. (2011). The uncertainty of innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Research, 4(1). http://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1039 Jamieson, D., Fettiplace, S., & York, C. (2012). Large Businesses and SMEs : Exploring how SMEs interact with large businesses, (July), 1–177. Jang, H., Lee, K., & Yoon, B. (2016). DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN INNOVATION MODEL FOR R&D COLLABORATION BETWEEN LARGE FIRMS AND SMALL-MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMES) IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 1750002. http://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500025 Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. a. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Computer‐ Mediated Communication. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 Jay, L. C., Wittmann, C. M., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social Exchange Theory and Research on Business-to-Business Relational Exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing. http://doi.org/10.1300/J033v08n03_01 Jemala, M. (2010). Introduction To Open Technology Innovation Strategies. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 18(3), 18. Jøsang, A., & Presti, S. S. (2004). Analysing the relationship between risk and trust. Trust Management, 135–145. Julienti Abu Bakar, L., & Ahmad, H. (2010). Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance. Business Process Management Journal, 16(3), 420–435. http://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011049430 Kane, G. C., & Alavi, M. (2007). Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes. Organization Science, 18(5), 796–812. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0286 Kaplan, R., & Saccuzzo, D. (2012). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Cengage Learning. Kappelman, L. a. (1995). Measuring user involvement: A diffusion of innovation. Data Base Advances, 26(2&3), 65–86. Kathan, W., Matzler, K., Hautz, J., & Hutter, K. (2014). Open innovation in SMEs: a case study of a regional open innovation platform. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(1), 16–26. Kerlinger, F. N. (1972). The structure and content of social attitude referents: A preliminary study. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Khairul Shazi, R. I. (2014). Trust In Innovation Networks. University of Queensland. Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2010). The effects of open innovation activity on performance of SMEs: the case of Korea. International Journal of Technology Management. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035975 Kim, N., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 519–536. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00733.x Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open innovation in practice. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28. Kirwan, C. (2013). Making sense of organizational learning: Putting theory into practice. Gower Publishing, Ltd.. Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. http://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798171 Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd. Kwei, N. S. (2017). What is Open Innovation ? Malay Mail Online, pp. 15–17. Lakemond, N., Bengtsson, L., Laursen, K., & Tell, F. (2016). Match and manage: The use of knowledge matching and project management to integrate knowledge in collaborative inbound open innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 333–352. http://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw004 Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507 Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004 Lazzarotti, R., & Manzini, V. (2009). Different Modes of Open Innovation: a Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 615–636. Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Nosella, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2015). Collaborations with Scientific Partners : The Mediating Role of the Social Context in Fostering Innovation Performance. Creativity and Innovation Management., 25(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12158 Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Pellegrini, L. (2011). Firm-specific factors and the openness degree: a survey of Italian firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 412–434. http://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174899 Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Pellegrini, L. (2015). Is your open-innovation successful? The mediating role of a firm’s organizational and social context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(19), 2453–2485. http://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.1003080 Lazzarotti Raffaella Manzini Luisa Pellegrini, V., Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., & Pellegrini, L. (2010). Measuring Business Excellence Open innovation models adopted in practice: an extensive study in Italy Open innovation models adopted in practice: an extensive study in Italy. Measuring Business Excellence European Journal of Innovation Management Iss European Journal of Innovation Management Iss European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 11–23. http://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011093721 Lee, C. A. (2012). Performance Measures of Strategic University - Industry Collaborations in Malaysia : Dyadic Multicases Approach Doctor of Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Lee, H., Cha, S., & Park, H. (2016). The effect of technology-exploration on product innovation: an analysis based on Korean manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 2(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-016-0009-y Lee, J. H., Lee, J. S., & Lee, H. (2003). Exploration and Exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 49(4), 553–570. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.553.14417 Lee, J. N., Huynh, M. Q., & Hirschheim, R. (2008). An integrative model of trust on IT outsourcing: Examining a bilateral perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(2), 145–163. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9066-7 Lee, M. K. O., Turban, E., Matthew, K. O., & Lee, E. T. (2001). A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91. Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010a). Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009 Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010b). Open innovation in SMEs — An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009 Lemola, T., & Lievonen, J. (2008). The role of innovation policy in fostering open innovation activities among companies. Economic Affairs. Levin, D. Z., Cross, R., & Abrams, L. C. (2002). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: the Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Proceedings & Membership Directory, 8(1), D1–D6. http://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.2002.7517527 Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24–25. http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375 Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter, 1993), 95–112. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. (pp. 133–173). Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In Trust in Organizations Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 114–139). http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n7 Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2349–2350. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22714 Leydesdorff, L., & Zawdie, G. (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 789–804. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511142 Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation: Reframing the Interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 107–126. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691. 2008.00477.x Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 148–157. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932 Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R and D Management, 39, 317–330. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00561.x Lichtenthaler, U. (2010a). Open innovation: potential risks and managerial countermeasures. Proceedings of the RD Management Conference. Lichtenthaler, U. (2010b). Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right “job” for your technology. Technovation, 30(7–8), 429–435. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010. 04.001 Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75–93. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.59198451 Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2007). External technology commercialization in large firms: Results of a quantitative benchmarking study. R and D Management, 37(5), 383–397. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00487.x Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2008). Innovation Intermediaries: Why Internet Marketplaces for Technology Have Not Yet Met the Expectations Creativity and Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00461.x Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 148–157. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932 Lin, H. F. (2011). An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 252–260. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.006 Linacre, J. (2012). A user’s guide to FACETS Rasch-model computer programs: Program manual 3.70.0. Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology (Vol. 129). http://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs051 Linacre, J. M. (2009). Winsteps (Version 3.68.0)[Computer Software]. Chicago: Winsteps. com. Lindegaard, S. (2011). Making open innovation work. Createspace, North Charleston Sc. Linell, P., & Marková, I. (2013). Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication. IAP. Lissitz, R. W., & Green, S. B. (1975). Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 10–13. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0076268 Lokshin, B., Belderbos, R., & Carree, M. (2008). The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 399–413. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008. 00503.x Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48. http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614550190 Luna, M., & Tirado, R. (2008). Business associations and their contribution to knowledge networks in Mexico. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development. http://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.7.3.251_1 Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Innovation System Research. Where it came from and where it might go. In Fifth Globelics Conference (p. 49). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1980. tb00220.x Lundvall, B. Å. (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Vol 2). Anthem Press. Ma, S., He, J., Shuai, X., & Wang, Z. (2010). Access Control Mechanism Based on Trust Quantification. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on (pp. 1032–1037). http://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.154 Magno, C. (2009). Demonstrating the difference between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory using derived test data. The International Journal of Educational and …, 1(1), 1–11. Malhotra, N. K. (2006). QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN AND SCALE DEVELOPMENT. In The handbook of marketing research: Uses, misuses, and future advances (pp. 89–94). Manley, K., & Kajewski, S. L. (2011). Innovation in construction: A case study of the Australian context. Modern construction economics: Theory and Application, 135–153. Manzini, R., & Lazzarotti, V. (2015). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in collaborative new product development. R&D Management, in press, 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12126 March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(71–87). March, J. G., Science, S. O., Issue, S., & Learning, O. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. Maskell, P. (2000). Social capital, innovation and competitiveness. Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, 111–123. Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167–185. http://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.167 Mata, J., & Woerter, M. (2013). Risky innovation: The impact of internal and external R&D strategies upon the distribution of returns. Research Policy, 42(2), 495–501. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.004 Maula, M., Keil, T., & Salmenkaita, J.-P. (2006). Open innovation in systemic innovation contexts. In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (Vol. 44, pp. 241–257). Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). Model of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080335 Meng, X. (2012). The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 188–198. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.04.002 Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York (Vol. Enlarged). Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018 Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational Responses to Crisi: The Centrality of Trust. Mohd Asaad, M. N. (2012). Hubungan Amalan Alatan Lean Terhadap Prestasi Organisasi Sengan Budaya Organisasi Sebagai Pembolehubah Moderator. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mooty, S., & Kedia, B. (2014). R&D Partnership Portfolio Strategies for Breakthrough Innovation: Developing Knowledge Exchange Capabilities. In Open Innovation Through Strategic Alliances: Approaches for Product, Technology, and Business Model Creation (p. 219). Möslein, K. (2010). Open Innovation. Innovation (Vol. 2006). MOSTI. (2012). National Survey of Innovation 2012. Putrajaya, Malaysia. MOSTI. (2014). OPEN INNOVATION IN PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Msanjila, S. S., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2011). On modelling evolution of trust in organisations towards mediating collaboration. Production Planning & Control, 22(5/6), 518–537. http://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.536623 MTDC. (2014). Synergy of Three Setting the Stage for 2015 Triple Helix in the Global Perspective. MTDC News. MTDC. (2017). The Right Support. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://www.mtdc.com.my/index.php/the-right-support/ Murphy, J. T. (2002). Networks, trust, and innovation in Tanzania’s manufacturing sector. World Development, 30(4), 591–619. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00131-0 Nakwa, K., & Zawdie, G. (2016). The “third mission” and “triple helix mission” of universities as evolutionary processes in the development of the network of knowledge production: Reflections on SME experiences in Thailand. Science and Public Policy, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw030 Naqshbandi, M. M., & Kaur, S. (2011a). Dimensions and Open Innovation. Journal of Management Research, 11(2), 77–86. Naqshbandi, M. M., & Kaur, S. (2011b). Factors Affecting Open Innovation : Evidence from Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 2783–2795. Naqshbandi, M. M., Kaur, S., & Ma, P. (2014). What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation? Quality & Quantity. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5 National Innovation Agency, M. (2015). Nurturing Innovation: Annual Report 2015. National innovation Agency of Malaysia. National Innovation Agency, M. (2017). AIM. Retrieved from http://innovation.my Nel, D., & Cook, D. (2016). Open innovation as a driver of economic development in emerging markets: as assessment of two Triple Helix projects in Southern Africa. In Advancing Triple Helix Theories (Vol. 5, pp. 21–28). Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Newton, N. (2010). The use of semi-structured interviews in qualitative research: strengths and weaknesses. Exploring qualitative methods. Nielsen, B. B., & Gudergan, S. (2012). Exploration and exploitation fit and performance in international strategic alliances. International Business Review, 21(4), 558–574. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.07.001 Nonaka, I. I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 Noor Liza, A. (2014). BEHAVIOUR : ITS ETHICAL ANTECEDENTS AND INFLUENCE ON. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Nooteboom, B. (2006). Innovation, learning and cluster dynamics. Clusters and Regional Development: Critical Reflections and Explorations, 137–163. Nooteboom, B. (2013). Trust and innovation. In Handbook of Advances in Trust Research (p. 106). Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 308–338. http://doi.org/10.2307/256885 Nordin, K. (2010). Strengthening University Industry Relations. In Lee, C. A. (2012). Performance Measures of Strategic University - Industry Collaborations in Malaysia : Dyadic Multicases Approach Doctor of Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn, 1994. McGraw- Hill, New York. Olkkonen, R., Tikkanen, H., & Alajoutsijärvi, K. (2000). The role of communication in business relationships and networks. Management Decision, 38(6), 403–409. http://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005365 Othman, A., Haiyat, U., & Kohar, A. (2014). University-industry technology commercialization in Malaysia: Opportunities and challenges. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30(30 A), 167–184. http://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30. icmrp.23

Similar Items