A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making

A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making

The success of an e-government information system could be determined by the citizens' intention to participate in public decision-making to use the technology for future benefits. There is lack of participation of citizens in e-governments implementation in most developing countries where thei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdulraheem, Maky h.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
eng
Published: 2018
Subjects:
T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/1/Depositpermission_s95795.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/2/s95795_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/3/s95795_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.7464
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
eng
advisor Sheik Osman, Wan Rozaini
Mohd Nadzir, Maslinda
topic T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
spellingShingle T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
Abdulraheem, Maky h.
A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
description The success of an e-government information system could be determined by the citizens' intention to participate in public decision-making to use the technology for future benefits. There is lack of participation of citizens in e-governments implementation in most developing countries where their opinions are not taken into considerations. This study has been conducted to identify the citizens' intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The first objective of this research is to identify the factors that influence the citizens' intention to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The second objective examines the citizens‘ self-knowledge characteristics that will moderate the relationship between the influencing factors and the citizens‘ intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The third objective is the development of a research model of the citizens' intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The research utilised the quantitative approach by distributing 501 questionnaires to four groups of respondents. Only 474 questionnaires were usable, representing a 94.6 % rate. The data was analysed utilising SPSS v21 to examine the relationships between the study‘s contributing factors with the moderators. The following factors, the attitude towards act or behaviour (ATB), subjective norms (SN), social influence (SI), facilitating condition (FC), compatibility (CO), and culture (CU), were identified to influence citizen intention to participate. Their different requirements have a potential impact on the public decision-making in the e-government. The research also took into consideration other factors which would contribute as moderator factors like gender, age, level of education, social group, working sector, and Internet experiences. The research has contributed to the body of knowledge by merging the concepts of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), two concepts from the UTAUT2 theory, and one concept from the DOI theory in this research. A model for citizens‘ self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making is presented.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Abdulraheem, Maky h.
author_facet Abdulraheem, Maky h.
author_sort Abdulraheem, Maky h.
title A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
title_short A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
title_full A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
title_fullStr A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
title_full_unstemmed A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
title_sort model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2018
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/1/Depositpermission_s95795.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/2/s95795_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/3/s95795_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828222647599104
spelling my-uum-etd.74642021-08-09T03:08:29Z A model for citizens' self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making 2018 Abdulraheem, Maky h. Sheik Osman, Wan Rozaini Mohd Nadzir, Maslinda Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences T58.6-58.62 Management information systems The success of an e-government information system could be determined by the citizens' intention to participate in public decision-making to use the technology for future benefits. There is lack of participation of citizens in e-governments implementation in most developing countries where their opinions are not taken into considerations. This study has been conducted to identify the citizens' intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The first objective of this research is to identify the factors that influence the citizens' intention to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The second objective examines the citizens‘ self-knowledge characteristics that will moderate the relationship between the influencing factors and the citizens‘ intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The third objective is the development of a research model of the citizens' intentions to participate in the public decision-making of the e-government. The research utilised the quantitative approach by distributing 501 questionnaires to four groups of respondents. Only 474 questionnaires were usable, representing a 94.6 % rate. The data was analysed utilising SPSS v21 to examine the relationships between the study‘s contributing factors with the moderators. The following factors, the attitude towards act or behaviour (ATB), subjective norms (SN), social influence (SI), facilitating condition (FC), compatibility (CO), and culture (CU), were identified to influence citizen intention to participate. Their different requirements have a potential impact on the public decision-making in the e-government. The research also took into consideration other factors which would contribute as moderator factors like gender, age, level of education, social group, working sector, and Internet experiences. The research has contributed to the body of knowledge by merging the concepts of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), two concepts from the UTAUT2 theory, and one concept from the DOI theory in this research. A model for citizens‘ self-knowledge that influences intention to participate in e-government public decision making is presented. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/1/Depositpermission_s95795.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/2/s95795_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7464/3/s95795_02.pdf text eng public http://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1697796~S1 Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abaas, T. J., Shibghatullah, A. S., & Jaber, M. M. (2014). Use information sharing environment concept to design electronic intelligence framework for support e-government: Iraq as case study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 4, 22-24. Abbas, T. (2016). Effective environmental factors to performance of electronic information sharing in Iraqi intelligence. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 100(3), 452-461. Abbasi, Tarhini, Hassouna, & Shah. (2015). Social, organizational, demography and individuals' technology acceptance behaviour: a conceptual model. European Scientific Journal, 11(9). Abdul Aziz, S., & Idris, K. (2012). E-government application: The challanges in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Business and Economics Research Conference. Abdulameer, M., Hasson, A. R., Shawkat, A. R., & Al-khafaji, N. J. (2012). Egovernment architecture uses data warehouse techniques to increase information sharing in Iraqi universities. Paper presented at the E-Learning, E-Management and E-Services (IS3e), 2012 IEEE Symposium on. Abdulameer, M., Ibrahim, H. B., Hussein, A. H., & Anad, M. M. (2013). General Egovernment Structure for Iraqi decentralization government Paper presented at the e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 2013 IEEE Conference on. Abdullah, T. (2014). A short history of Iraq: Routledge. Abdulwahid, H. S., Mutalib, A. A., & Ali, S. J. (2014). Comparison of e-government portals to various countries around the world to identify the basic requirements in the design of the e-government portal: A literature review. The journal Int'l Journal of Computing, Communications & Instrumentation Engg. Abdulwahida, H. S., Mutaliba, A. A., Yusofa, S. A. M., & Alib, S. J. (2014). Designing and implementation Iraqi e-government front office online system. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 4(1.1). Abu-Shanab. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453-463. Abu-Shanab, E. (2014). Antecedents of trust in e-government services: an empirical test in Jordan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 480-499. Adeyeye, M. O., & Aladesanmi, O. A. T. (2011). Re-inventing local government capacity in Nigeria: The e-governance imperative. Paper presented at the MIPRO, 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention. Ahmed. (2016). Engagement of Citizens in e-Government, a Conceptual Framework Using Serious Gaming. Aiken, West, & Reno. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: Sage. Ainin, Parveen, Moghavvemi, Jaafar, & Shuib, M. (2015). Factors influencing the use of social media by SMEs and its performance outcomes. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(3), 570-588. Ajzen. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior Action control (pp. 11-39): Springer. Ajzen. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Journal Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen. (2006). Theory of planned behaviour diagram. Icek Ajzen-Homepage: http://people. umass. edu/aizen/tpb. html. Ajzen. (2011). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Journal Unpublished Manuscript. Retrieved, 1. Ajzen, & Fishbein. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. CiteULike, 123456. Ajzen, & Timko. (1986). Correspondence between health attitudes and behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4), 259-276. Al-Araji, S. (2010). Investment overview of Iraq. Iraqi National Investment Commission. Al-Dalou, R., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2013). E-participation levels and technologies. Paper presented at the The 6th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT 2013). Al-Jabri, I. M., & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile banking adoption: application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 379-391. Al-khafaji, N. J., Shittu, A. J. K., & Osman, W. R.-z. S. (2014). G2G interaction among local agencies in developing countries based on diffusion of innovations theory. Paper presented at the Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP), 2014 Fourth International Conference on. Al-Khafaji, N. J., Shittuline, A. J. K., & Osman, W. R. B. S. (2012). The effect of resistance to change in the application of e-government in Iraq. Paper presented at the 2012 Tenth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering. Al-Nahdi, Habib, & Albdour. (2015). Factors influencing the intention to purchase real estate in Saudi Arabia: moderating effect of demographic citizenship. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 35. Al-Swidi, Mohammed, Hafeez, H., & Shariff, N. M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. British Food Journal, 116(10), 1561-1580. Al-Taie, & Kadry. (2013). E-government: Latest trend and future perspective the Iraq case. Journal of Computer Alaaraj. (2015). The mediating effect of good governance on the relationship between e-government and public trust in Lebanon. International Journal of Learning & Development, 4(2164-4063). Alaaraj, & Ibrahim, F. (2014). The mediating effect of employee's trust on egovernment and good governance in the public sector of developing countries. The Journal International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(3), 92-103. Aladwani. (2014). Cognitive beliefs about and the positive psychological tendency towards e-government quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 570-574. AlAwadhi, & Morris. (2008). The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of Egovernment Services in Kuwait. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual. Alawneh, Al-Refai, & Batiha. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 277-288. Alghamdi, Goodwin, & Rampersad. (2011). E-government readiness assessment for government organizations in developing countries. Journal Computer and Information Science, 4(3), p3. Alharbi, & Kang. (2014). E‐participation service in Saudi Arabian e‐government websites: The influencing factors from citizens’ perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on E-Government: ECEG 2014. Alharbi, Kang, & Hawryszkiewycz. (2016). The Influence of Trust and subjective Norms on Citizens Intentions to Engage in E-participation on E-government Websites. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.00746. Allahawiah, & Alsaraireh. (2014). The benefits of knowledge management and egovernment in raising citizen engagement-jordan case study. Journal of Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 9(1), 213. Alqasa, & Al-Matari. (2015). Technology adoption and innovation of e-government in republic of Iraq. Journal: Asian Social Science, 11(3), p135. Alsaghier, Ford, Nguyen, & Hexel. (2011). Conceptualising citizen's trust in egovernment: Application of Q methodology. Leading Issues in EGovernment, 1, 204. Alshehri, & Drew. (2010). Challenges of e-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia from an e-ready citizen perspective. Journal Education, 29(5.1). Alshehri, Drew, & AlGhamdi. (2013). Analysis of citizens acceptance for egovernment services: applying the UTAUT model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.3157. Alsous, Alhalaiqa, Farha, Jalil, McElnay, & Horne. (2017). Reliability and validity of arabic translation of medication adherence report scale (MARS) and beliefs about medication questionnaire (BMQ)–specific for use in children and their parents. PLoS One, 12(2), e0171863. Alzahrani, Karaghouli, & Weerakkody. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens‘ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164-175. Ameen, & Willis. (2015). The effect of cultural values on technology adoption in the arab countries. Journal of Information Systems, 2. Andrew. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling: University of Kansas, KS. Andrew. (2017). The Process macro for SPSS and SAS. Retrieved 12 am, 2 July, 2017, from http://www.processmacro.org/index.html Ang, C.-L., Davies, M. A., & Finlay, P. N. (2001). An empirical model of IT usage in the Malaysian public sector. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(2), 159-174. Angeles. (2013). Using the technology-organization-environment framework and Zuboff's concepts for understanding environmental sustainability and RFID: two case studies. Journal Computer and Information Science, 7(11). Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. r.-S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics: National Bureau of Economic Research. Apostolou, Mentzas, Stojanovic, Thoenssen, & Lobo, P. (2011). A collaborative decision framework for managing changes in e-government services. Journal Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 101-116. Apple. (2014). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York and London: Routledge. Arendsen, Peters, Hedde, t., & Dijk, v. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160-169. Arikan, A. T. (2009). Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Journal of Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 658-676. Asorwoe. (2014). Can e-government mitigate administrative corruption? An empirical study into the potential role of e-eovernment in eradicating administrative corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3 (4), 2319-8834. Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. UN General Assembly. Athmay, A. (2013). E-Governance in arab countries: Status and challenges. Global Journal of Business Research, 7(5), 79-98. Baban, & Pollus. (2010). National development plan for years 2010-2014. Republic of Iraq, Ministry of Planning, Baghdad. p. 1, 186. Bakar, Choy, Lin, & Radzi. (2014). Towards e-Government: End-User Satisfaction with IT Implementation at Royal Malaysian Customs. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(03), 451-471. Baker. (2012). The technology-organization-environment framework Journal Information Systems Theory (pp. 231-245): Springer. Baker, Al-Gahtani, & Hubona. (2007). The effects of gender and age on new technology implementation in a developing country: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Information Technology & People, 20(4), 352-375. Baker, & Blaagaard. (2016). Reconceptualizing citizen media. Citizen Media and Public Spaces, 1. Balthazard, & Cooke. (2004). Organizational culture and knowledge management success: assessing the behavior-performance continuum. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. Banowosari, Wicaksana, S., Wulandari, Purnamasari, & Setyantana. (2014). Population metadata development to support data interoperability between government agencies in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, 9(11). Baptista, & Oliveira. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418-430. Barbosa, Pitta, Senne, & Sozio. (2016). Survey sampling and administration. Regional Center for Studies on the Development of the Information Society (Cetic.br), Brazil. Baron, & Kenny. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Barry, E., & Bannister, F. (2014). Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Journal of Information Polity, 19(1), 129-152. Bataineh, & Abu-Shanab. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 315-334. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixedeffects models using Eigen and S4. R package version, 1(7). Bazargan, Teruya, Pan, Lin, Gordon, Krochalk, & Bazargan. (2017). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and texting while driving behavior in college students. Traffic injury prevention, 18(1), 56-62. Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131. Belanche, D., Casala, L. V., & Flavian, C. (2012). Integrating trust and personal values into the technology acceptance model: The case of e-government services adoption. The Journal Cuadernos de Economia y Direccion de la Empresa, 15(4), 192-204. BinTouq. (2015). The UAE federal government‘s e-participation roadmap: Developments in UAE empowerment initiatives with VGI/PGIS and location based services (LBS). Canadian Social Science, 11(5), 1-10. Bloor, Sampson, Baker, & Dahlgren. (2013). Useful but no Oracle: Reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a multi-methods policy research study. The Journal Qualitative Research, 15(1), 75-70. Bock, Gibbons, & Muraki. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(3), 261-280. Bonson, Torres, Royo, & Flores. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. The Journal Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123-132. Bradford, & Florin. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International journal of accounting information systems, 4(3), 205-225. Breslow, N. (1970). A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika, 57(3), 579-594. Bruder, Haffke, Neave, Nouripanah, & Imhoff. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 225. Bryer. (2013). Public participation in regulatory decision-making: Cases from regulations. gov. Journal: Public Performance & Management Review, 37(2), 263-279. Bryman, & Bell. (2015). Business research methods: Oxford University Press, USA. Buffat. (2013). Street-level bureaucracy and e-government. The Journal Public Management Review, 17(1), 149-161. Burnham, Lafta, Doocy, & Roberts. (2006). Mortality after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey. The Journal The Lancet, 368(9545), 1421-1428. Buttigieg, & Ramette. (2014). A guide to statistical analysis in microbial ecology: a community-focused, living review of multivariate data analyses. FEMS microbiology ecology, 90(3), 543-550. Calabrese, F., Colonna, M., Lovisolo, P., Parata, D., & Ratti, C. (2011). Real-time urban monitoring using cell phones: A case study in Rome. The Journal Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 12(1), 141-151. Callen, J. L., Braithwaite, J., & Westbrook, J. I. (2008). Contextual implementation model: a framework for assisting clinical information system implementations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(2), 255-262. Cambridge. (Ed.) (2017a) Cambridge dictionary. Cambridge dictionary: Cambridge dictionary. Cambridge. (Ed.) (2017b) Cambridge Dictionary Cambridge Dictionary Cambridge. Cambridge. (Ed.) (2017c) Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge dictionary. Carlson, E. N. (2013). Overcoming the barriers to self-knowledge mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 173-186. Carter, & Belanger. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal, 15(1), 5-25. Ceccaroni, Bowser, & Brenton. (2017). Civic Education and Citizen Science: Definitions, Categories, Knowledge Representation Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research (pp. 1-23): IGI Global. Chae, Cho, & Kim. (2016). Influencing factors on fertility intention of women university students: Based on the theory of planned behavior. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 123, 37-42. Chan. (2003). Biostatistics 102: Quantitative data–parametric & non-parametric tests. blood pressure, 140(24.08), 79.00. Chan. (2017). Media power in Hong Kong: Hyper-marketized media and cultural resistance: Taylor & Francis. Chang, & Chen. (2008). The impact of customer interface quality, satisfaction and switching costs on e-loyalty: Internet experience as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2927-2944. Charalabidis, Lampathaki, Misuraca, & Osimo. (2012). ICT for governance and policy modelling: Research challenges and future prospects in europe. Paper presented at the System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on. Chen. (2010). Are educational background and gender moderator variables for leadership, satisfaction and organizational commitment? African Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 248. Choo. (1996). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions. International journal of information management, 16(5), 329-340. Choudrie. (2016). Older adults in households and e-government services in Saudi Arabia, Hail city: A digital divide study of adoption, use and diffusion. Pacific Asia Conference of Information Systems (PACIS) Proceedings. Christensen, Johnson, & Turner. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Chua, A. Y. K., Goh, D. H., & Ang, R. P. (2012). Web 2.0 applications in government web sites: prevalence, use and correlations with perceived web site quality. Online Information Review, 36(2), 175-195. Church. (2001). Is there a method to our madness? The impact of data collection methodology on organizational survey results. Personnel psychology, 54(4), 937-969. Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge. Coleman, & Cardoso. (2017). Sustaining a democratic innovation: A study of three e-participatory budgets in Belo Horizonte. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 754-769. Comrey, & Lee. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd edn.) Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Publishers: Hillsdale, New Jersey. Cox, V. (2017). Exploratory data analysis Translating Statistics to Make Decisions (pp. 47-74): Springer. Creswell. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. (Vol. 39(2)): Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage. Cronbach. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 475-494. Cronbach, Rajaratnam, & Gleser. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16(2), 137-163. Crossley, E., Seri, S., Stern, J. S., Robertson, M. M., & Cavanna, A. E. (2014). Premonitory urges for tics in adult patients with Tourette syndrome. Brain and Development, 36(1), 45-50. Dabbicco, G. (2015). The impact of accrual-based public accounting harmonization on EU macroeconomic surveillance and governments‘ policy decision making. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 253-267. Danila, R., & Abdullah, A. (2014). User's satisfaction on e-government services: An integrated model. Journal: Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 575-582. Dawes, Vidiasova, & Parkhimovich. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15-27. Decman. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272-281. Delshad, M., Sarbazi, N., Rezaei_Ghaleh, N., Ghanbarian, A., & Azizi, F. (2012). Reliability and validity of the modifiable activity questionnaire (MAQ) in an Iranian urban adult population. Archives of Iranian medicine, 15(5), 279. DeMeester, Lopez, Moore, Cook, & Chin. (2016). A model of organizational context and shared decision making: application to LGBT racial and ethnic minority patients. Journal of general internal medicine, 31(6), 651-662. Diatmika, Irianto, & Baridwan. (2016). Determinants of behavior intention Of accounting information systems based information technology acceptance. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(8). Dijk, Ebbers, & Wijngaert. (2015). e‐Government. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. Dimaggio, C. (2013). Introduction: Springer. Dombrowski, Hayes, Mazmanian, & Voida. (2014). E-government intermediaries and the challenges of access and trust. Journal: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21(2), 13. Dulcic, Z., Pavlic, D., & Silic, I. (2012). Evaluating the intended use of decision support system (DSS) by applying technology acceptance model (TAM) in business organizations in Croatia. The Journal Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1565-1575. Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R., & Schneberger, S. L. (2012). Information systems theory: Springer. Dzakiria, H. (2004). Technology does not always teach distance learners, but effective distance teachers do. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(1), 60-81. Ebbers, Jansen, & Deursen, v. (2016). Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685-692. Efrat. (2014). The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation. Technovation, 34(1), 12-20. Elliott, A. C., & Hynan, L. S. (2011). A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal–Wallis analysis. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 102(1), 75-80. Elsheikh, & Azzeh. (2014). What facilitates the delivery of citizen-centric egovernment services in developing countries: Model development and validation through structural equation modeling. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT), 6(1). Ergu, & Kou. (2012). Questionnaire design improvement and missing item scores estimation for rapid and efficient decision making. The Journal Annals of Operations Research, 197(1), 5-23. Escobar, Carvajal, & Monge. (2014). Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool: An extension of the UTAUT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2). Faaeq, Alqasa, & Al-Matari. (2015). Technology adoption and innovation of egovernment in republic of Iraq. Asian Social Science, 11(3), 135. Fakhoury, R., & Aubert, B. (2015). Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services: The case of Lebanon. International journal of information management, 35(3), 346-351. Farlex. (Ed.) (2017) The Free Dictionary. Farlex: The Free Dictionary: Farlex: The Free Dictionary. Fath-Allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-Qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-government maturity models: A comparative study. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 5(3), 71. Feeney, & Welch. (2016). Technology–task coupling: Exploring social media use and managerial perceptions of e-government. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 162-179. Feir-Walsh, B. J., & Toothaker, L. E. (1974). An empirical comparison of the ANOVA F-test, normal scores test and Kruskal-Wallis test under violation of assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(4), 789-799. Filzmoser. (2016). Identification of multivariate outliers: a performance study. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 34(2), 127-138. Fishbein, & Ajzen. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Flavin, P., & Keane, M. J. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63-78. Font, Wojcieszak, & Navarro. (2015). Participation, representation and expertise: Citizen preferences for political decision-making processes. Political Studies, 63(1 suppl), 153-172. Frankfort, & Nachmias. (2007). Study guide for research methods in the social sciences: Macmillan. Frazier, Tix, & Barron. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of counseling psychology, 51(1), 115. Fullan, M. (2014). Leading in a culture of change personal action guide and workbook: John Wiley & Sons. Gaber, S., & Mojskerc, N. (2014). E-participation as a possible upgrading of representative democracy. Journal Teorija in Praksa, 51(6). Gatautis, Kulvietis, & Vitkauskaite. (2015). Lithuanian eGovernment interoperability model. Engineering Economics, 62(2). Gertler, B. (2015). Self-Knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ghasemi, & Zahediasl. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486. Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Electronic Government Success and the Ensemble View of Information Technology. Enacting Electronic Government Success (pp. 33-65): Springer. Grau. (2007). Using factor analysis and Cronbach‘s alpha to ascertain relationships between questions of a dietary behavior questionnaire. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association. Mathematica Policy Research, 600. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2009). Introduction to hypothesis testing. Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 229-279. Guiso, Sapienza, & Zingales. (2015). The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 60-76. Gupta, Dasgupta, & Gupta. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154. Haider, Z., Shuwen, C., & Hyder, S. (2014). Citizens' participation in e-government services: A Comparative Study of Pakistan & Singapore. IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 9(6), 35-38. Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson College Division. Hasani, N., & Beleraj, B. (2013). E-Government as an anti corruption tool. The case of Albania. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 712. Hashemi, S., Monfaredi, K., & Masdari, M. (2013). Using cloud computing for egovernment: Challenges and benefits. International Journal of Computer, 7(9), 447-454. Hassan, I. M., Mahdi, A. A., & Al-Khafaji, N. J. (2014). Theoretical study to highlight the smart government components in 21 st century. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(12), 333 – 347. Hayes. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Press. Hayes, & Rockwood. (2016). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy. Heeks. (2006). Understanding and measuring eGovernment: international benchmarking studies. Paper presented at the UNDESA workshop, "eparticipation and e-government: Understanding the present and creating the future", Budapest, Hungary. Herman Resende Santos, D. F. T. (2014). Possibilities and limits of e-participation: A systematic review of e-democracy. Rio de Journal, 13(RJ). Hertzog. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in nursing & health, 31(2), 180-191. Hien, N. M. (2014). A study on evaluation of e-government service quality. International Journal Soc. Manage. Econ. Bus. Eng, 8(1). Hill. (1998). What sample size is ―enough‖ in internet survey research. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An electronic journal for the 21st century, 6(3-4), 1-12. Hirsch, R. M., & Slack, J. R. (1984). A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resources Research, 20(6), 727-732. Hossain, & Moon. (2011). Impacts of organizational assimilation of e-government systems on business value creation: A structuration theory approach. The Journal Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(5), 576-594. Hox, J. J., & Boeije, H. R. (2005). Data collection, primary vs. secondary. Encyclopedia of social measurement, 1, 593-599. Hsu, & Chiu. (2007). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 359-373. Hsu, Yu, & Wu. (2014). Exploring the continuance intention of social networking websites: an empirical research. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(2), 139-163. Hujran, Debei, Chatfield, & Migdadi. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 189-203. Ibrahim, Hilles, Adam, Jamous, & Yafooz. (2016). Theoretical Framework Formation for e-government Services Evaluation: Case Study of Federal Republic of Nigeria. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(37). Igari, N. (2014). How to successfully promote ICT usage: A comparative analysis of Denmark and Japan. Journal of Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 115-125. Im, Cho, Porumbescu, & Park. (2014). Internet, trust in government, and citizen compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 741-763. Iravani, M., Zadehb, M. S., & Foroziac, A. (2012). Study of factors affecting young consumers to choose green products. J Basic Appl Sci Res, 2(6), 5534-5544. Jackson, & Wong. (2014). A cultural theory analysis of e-government uptake in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association 64th Annual International Conference. Jackson, & Wong. (2015). Understanding subcultures and change dynamics in egovernment: An empirical study of a local government in Malaysia. Information Systems and e-Business Management. Janssen, Konopnicki, Snowdon, & Ojo. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 189-195. Jayashree, Salehi, Abdollahbeigi, & Malarvizhi. (2016). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among Iran citizens. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(34). Johanson, & Brooks. (2010). Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400. Johare, R., Masrek, M. N., & Sa'ari, H. (2013). Information technology leadership on electronic records management: The Malaysian experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings For the 9th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance: ECMLG 2013. Johnson. (1999). The insignificance of statistical significance testing. The journal of wildlife management, 763-772. Johnson, & Wichern. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (Vol. 5): Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ. Julious. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat, 4(4), 287-291. Jun, Wang, & Wang. (2014). E-government use and perceived government transparency and service capacity. Journal Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 125-151.

Similar Items