Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu

Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu

This purpose of this study is to aimed at reviewing safety management practices and safety behaviors at one of the construction site in Kota Kinabalu. A sample was taken randomly consisting of 127 workers from 192 employees as a whole. Survey data was obtained by using questionnaire for workers at t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rushamizan, Rustam
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2017
Subjects:
HD4801-8943 Labor
Work
Working Class
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/1/s821314_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/2/s821314_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.7629
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Azizan, Norizan
topic HD4801-8943 Labor
Work
Working Class
spellingShingle HD4801-8943 Labor
Work
Working Class
Rushamizan, Rustam
Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
description This purpose of this study is to aimed at reviewing safety management practices and safety behaviors at one of the construction site in Kota Kinabalu. A sample was taken randomly consisting of 127 workers from 192 employees as a whole. Survey data was obtained by using questionnaire for workers at the site. The positive correlation value also indicates a positive relationship between the variables. Test results founded significant to all relationships between safety management practices and safe behavior. Safety training has the highest significant relationship within safety behavior (r = 0.515, p <0.01), followed by management commitment (r = 0.435, p <0.01) and the last is rules and procedures (r = 0.239, p <0.01). On the other hand, for regression tests, the results of the analysis showed that the three studied in this study were only significant safety training on safety behavior (B = 0.339, t = 3.496, p <0.01). However, it still requires a broader and deeper study. These findings provide valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners in identifying which mechanisms can enhance safety at work.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Rushamizan, Rustam
author_facet Rushamizan, Rustam
author_sort Rushamizan, Rustam
title Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
title_short Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
title_full Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
title_fullStr Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu
title_sort hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di kota kinabalu
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2017
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/1/s821314_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/2/s821314_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828244489437184
spelling my-uum-etd.76292021-08-18T06:35:54Z Hubungan di antara amalan pengurusan keselamatan dan tingkah laku keselamatan di salah satu tapak binaan di Kota Kinabalu 2017 Rushamizan, Rustam Azizan, Norizan Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD4801-8943 Labor. Work. Working Class This purpose of this study is to aimed at reviewing safety management practices and safety behaviors at one of the construction site in Kota Kinabalu. A sample was taken randomly consisting of 127 workers from 192 employees as a whole. Survey data was obtained by using questionnaire for workers at the site. The positive correlation value also indicates a positive relationship between the variables. Test results founded significant to all relationships between safety management practices and safe behavior. Safety training has the highest significant relationship within safety behavior (r = 0.515, p <0.01), followed by management commitment (r = 0.435, p <0.01) and the last is rules and procedures (r = 0.239, p <0.01). On the other hand, for regression tests, the results of the analysis showed that the three studied in this study were only significant safety training on safety behavior (B = 0.339, t = 3.496, p <0.01). However, it still requires a broader and deeper study. These findings provide valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners in identifying which mechanisms can enhance safety at work. 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/1/s821314_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7629/2/s821314_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdelhamid, T.S. and Everett, J.G. (2000), “Identifying root causes of construction accidents”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126 No. 1, pp. 52-60. Bluff, L. (2003). Systematic Management of Occupational Health and Safety. Occupational Health, 1–66. Retrieved from http://ohs.anu.edu.au/publications/pdf/wp 20 - Bluff.pdf Cheng, E. W. L., Ryan, N., & Kelly, S. (2012). Exploring the perceived influence of safety management practices on project performance in the construction industry. Safety Science, 50(2), 363–369. Chileshe, N. and Dzisi,E. (2012), “Benefits and barriers of construction health and safety management (HSM): Perceptions of practitioners within design organisations”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 10 No.2, pp. 276-298. Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., & Mohamed, S. (2007). The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Safety Science, 45(10), 993–1012. Creswell, J. W.(2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research. Pearson (2012). Cox, S.J. and Cheyne, A.J.T. (2000), “Assessing safety culture in offshore environments”, Safety Science, Vol. 34, pp. 111-129. Dekker, S. W. A. (2002). Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: The new view of error and performance. Journal of Safety Research. 33, 371-385. Dingsdag, D.P., Biggs, H.C. and Sheahan, V.L. (2008), “Understanding and defining OH&S competency for construction site positions: Worker perception”, Safety Science, Vol. 46, pp. 619–633. Fang, D., Chen, Y. and Wong, L. (2006), “Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132 No.6, pp. 573-584. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2009). Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Safety Science, 47(7), 980–991. Goh, Y. M., & Askar Ali, M. J. (2015). A hybrid simulation approach for integrating safety behavior into construction planning: An earthmoving case study. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 93, pp. 310-318. Hale, A., & Borys, D. (2013). Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, 55, pp. 207–221. Harms-Ringdahl, L. (2004), “Relationships between accident investigations, risk analysis, and safety Management”, Journal of Hazardous Material, Vol. 111, pp. 13-19. Healey, M. (2005) Linking research and teaching: disciplinary spaces. In: R. Barnett (Ed.) Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, 30-42. Hofmann, D.A., Jacobs, R. and Landy, F. (1995), “High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro-organisational influences on safety performances”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 26, pp. 131-149. Hon, C.K.H., Hinze, J. and Chan, A.P.C. (2014), “Safety climate and injury occurrence of repair, maintenance, minor alteration and addition works: A comparison of workers, supervisors and managers”, Facilities, Vol. 32 Iss 5/6, pp. 188-207. Huang, YH., Ho, M., Smith, G.S. and Chen, P.Y. (2006), “Safety climate and self reported injury: Assessing the mediating role of employee safety control”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, pp. 425–433. Jaafar Sarani, W.W Choong, Mohamed A.H, (2017) "Facilities maintenance employees’ priority of safety management practices: A research study in Malaysia", Facilities, Vol. 35 Issue: 5/6, pp.319-334 Jabatan Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (2017), Occupational Accidents Stastistics by Sector Until October 2017. Retrived November 30, 2017 from http://www.dosh.gov.my/index.php/en/occupational-accident-statistics/by-sector Labodova, A. (2004), “Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 12, pp. 571–580. Langford, D., Rowlinson, S., and Sawacha, E. (2000), “Safety behavior and safety management: Its influence on the attitudes of workers in the UK construction industry”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 7 Iss 2, pp. 133–140. Law, W.K., Chan, A.H.S. and Pun, K.F. (2006), “Prioritising the safety elements: A hierarchical analysis for manufacturing enterprises”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 106 Iss. 6, pp. 778–792 Leung, M.-Y., Liang, Q., & Olomolaiye, P. (2016). Impact of Job Stressors and Stress on the Safety Behavior and Accidents of Construction Workers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 4015019. Mearns, K., Whitaker, S.M. and Flin, R. (2003), "Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments”, Safety Science, Vol 4, pp. 641-680. Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 99–109. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1999,17, 275-280. Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial Malaysia (2017). Number of Industrial Accidents Reported 2011 - 2015 (2017). Retrived July 30, 2017 from http:// www.perkeso.gov.my/my/laporan/bilangan-kemalangan.html Saidin Misnan & Abdul Hakim. (2007). Pembangunan Budaya Keselamatan dalam Industri Pembinaan. The Malaysian Surveyor, 20-33. Sari, F.O. (2009), “Effects of employee trainings on the occupational safety and health in accommodation sector”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 1865- 1870. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research method for business: A skill building approach. United Kingdom: John Wiley & sons, Inc (2012). Sidek, L. A. (2015). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SAFETY MANAGEMENT PRACTICE AND SAFETY BEHAVIOUR AMONG EMPLOYEES OF ONE AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY IN MALAYSIA. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Suraji, A. , DRoy Duff, and P. S. J. (2001). Collective Household Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(AUGUST), 337–344. Toole, T. M. (2002), “Construction site safety roles”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management”, Vol. 128 No. 3, pp. 203-210. Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2009). Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry, Safety Science, 47(5), 659–667. Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 42 Issue 6, pp. 2082-2093 Vredenburgh, A.G. (2002), “Organisational Safety: Which Management Practices are Most Effective in Reducing Injury Rates?”, Journal of Safety Research, 33: 259-276. Waring, A. (1996), “Corporate health and safety strategy”, Facilities, Vol. 14 No 3/ 4, pp. 52-55. Wilson Jr, Joe M. and Koehn, E. (2000), “Safety management: Problems encountered and recommended solutions”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126 No 1, pp. 77-79. Zin, S. M., & Ismail, F. (2012). Employers’ Behavioural Safety Compliance Factors toward Occupational, Safety and Health Improvement in the Construction Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36(June 2011), 742–751. Zohar, D. (1980), “Safety climate in industrial organisations: Theoretical and applied implications”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65 No 1, pp. 96-102.

Similar Items