Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia

The call for public sector entities to increase accountability is consistent with the economic rationale suggesting the need for government to ensure an added value for every single public money disbursed on programmes, especially when available fund are limited. Hence, the Indonesian government upg...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mattoasi,
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2018
Subjects:	HC Economic History and Conditions
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/1/s92385_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/2/s92385_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.7652
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Samsudin, Rose Shamsiah
topic	HC Economic History and Conditions
spellingShingle	HC Economic History and Conditions Mattoasi, , Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
description	The call for public sector entities to increase accountability is consistent with the economic rationale suggesting the need for government to ensure an added value for every single public money disbursed on programmes, especially when available fund are limited. Hence, the Indonesian government upgraded its performance measurement model of Local Financial Administration Manual (MAKUDA) into a Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) performance measurement model based on Presidential Instruction No.7, 1999. The goal was to provide local government greater ability to drive its entitlement towards better performance management. A preliminary study on the government of Gorontalo City found that even after 18 years of implementation, the effectiveness of LAKIP implementation tends to rely solely on financial performance measurement. This indepth study aimed to identify the effectiveness of LAKIP, explore factors that impede its effectiveness and recommend improvements for the effective implementation of LAKIP. This study used qualitative method with case study approach. Data from documents, interviews and observations were analyzed using Content Analysis and Interactive Model. The findings show that the effectiveness of the LAKIP model is less successful as most government programmes only achieved output performances. The theory of accountability cautions that managers must work as trustees of public funds to drive the organization's performance to a better level. When the level of accountability is identified, government managers must work to take advantage of every situation towards achieving maximum level of performance as a form of accountability to the public. The findings suggest some improvements which include the need to conduct performance audits on programmes and activities. Future quantitative studies may be able to provide a more comprehensive picture of the scenario in all district and city governments in theState of Gorontalo.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Mattoasi, ,
author_facet	Mattoasi, ,
author_sort	Mattoasi, ,
title	Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
title_short	Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
title_full	Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
title_fullStr	Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed	Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia
title_sort	keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model lakip : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar gorontalo, indonesia
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA)
publishDate	2018
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/1/s92385_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/2/s92385_02.pdf
_version_	1747828249405161472
spelling	my-uum-etd.76522021-08-11T01:36:30Z Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia 2018 Mattoasi, , Samsudin, Rose Shamsiah Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA) Tunku Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA) HC Economic History and Conditions The call for public sector entities to increase accountability is consistent with the economic rationale suggesting the need for government to ensure an added value for every single public money disbursed on programmes, especially when available fund are limited. Hence, the Indonesian government upgraded its performance measurement model of Local Financial Administration Manual (MAKUDA) into a Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) performance measurement model based on Presidential Instruction No.7, 1999. The goal was to provide local government greater ability to drive its entitlement towards better performance management. A preliminary study on the government of Gorontalo City found that even after 18 years of implementation, the effectiveness of LAKIP implementation tends to rely solely on financial performance measurement. This indepth study aimed to identify the effectiveness of LAKIP, explore factors that impede its effectiveness and recommend improvements for the effective implementation of LAKIP. This study used qualitative method with case study approach. Data from documents, interviews and observations were analyzed using Content Analysis and Interactive Model. The findings show that the effectiveness of the LAKIP model is less successful as most government programmes only achieved output performances. The theory of accountability cautions that managers must work as trustees of public funds to drive the organization's performance to a better level. When the level of accountability is identified, government managers must work to take advantage of every situation towards achieving maximum level of performance as a form of accountability to the public. The findings suggest some improvements which include the need to conduct performance audits on programmes and activities. Future quantitative studies may be able to provide a more comprehensive picture of the scenario in all district and city governments in theState of Gorontalo. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/1/s92385_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7652/2/s92385_02.pdf text eng public http://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1698838~S1 Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah, N. A. (2012). Performance measurement in Malaysia’s higher education. PMA 2012 Conference, (July), 11–13. http://irep.iium.edu.my/26520/1/PMA2012_ Anisah.pdf Abnur, A. (2017, Januari 25). Tingkat akuntabilitas pemerintah daerah rendah. Kompas.Com, Rabu 25 Januari 2017. Abogun, S., & Fagbemi, T. O. (2012). The efficacy of budgeting as a control measure in developing economies: a study from Nigeria. Asian Social Science, 8(1), 176–182. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n1p176 Adams, C.A., Muir, S., & Hoque, Z. (2014). Measurement of sustainability performance in the public sector. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 46–67. http://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2012-0018 Ade, M. (2015). Pengaruh kebijakan penyusunan anggaran, penerapan anggaran dan belanja daerah berbasis kinerja terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. http://doi.org/repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/49923 Afrizal. (2016). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada. Agia, L. (2015). Evaluasi penerapan sistem pengukuran dan pelaporan kinerja (Studi kasus pada Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Riau). Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2015. Retrieved from http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod Aguinis, H. (2009). An expanded view of performance management.performance management: Putting Research into Action, 1–43. http://doi.org/978-0-470-19232-0 Agustinus, J. (2015). Implementation and reporting and spending fund of Papua special autonomy. Information Management & Business Review, 7(2),79–86 Akbar, R.; Pilcher, R.; dan Perrin, B. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24 (3), 262-29, https://doi.org/10.1108/01140581211283878 Akbar,R; Pilcher,R dan Perrin,B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems: Indonesian local government under pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(1),3-33.https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013 Akyuz, G. A. (2015). Quality excellence in complex supply networks:EFQM excellence model reconsidered. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(12),1282–1297.http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.929253 Alach, Z. (2017a). Performance measurement maturity in a national set of universities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(2), 216–230. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2015-0158 Alach, Z. (2017b). The use of performance measurement in universities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 102–117. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2016-0089 Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., & Reichwald, R. (2015). Management of permanent change. London: Springer Gabler. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05014-6 ISBN Albanese, R., Dacin, M.T., Harris, I. C. (1997). Agents as stewards. Academy of Management Review, 22, 609–614. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.15868807 Alexander, K; Löffler, E; Klages, H; dan Korac‐Kakabadse,N. (1999). Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors: Towards learning for agency effectiveness. International Journal of Public Sector Management,12 (2),121-144, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559910263462 Alonso, J., Clifton, J., & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2015). Did new public management matter? an empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 643–660 Alwardat, Y. A., Benamraoui, A., & Rieple, A. (2015). Value for money and audit practice in the UK public sector. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 206–217. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12037 Ammons, D. N., Liston, E. G., & Jones, J. a. (2013). Performance management purpose, executive engagement, and reported benefits among leading local governments. State and Local Government Review, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X13498261 Amnah. (2014). Pengaruh pendapatan asli daerah, dana alokasi umum, dana alokasi khusus terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi dengan belanja modal sebagai variabel intervening di Kabupaten dan Kota Provinsi Aceh. USU Medan. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/39986/Cover.pdf. Anjarwati, M. (2012). Pengaruh kejelasan sasaran anggaran, pengendalian akuntansi dan sistem pelaporan terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(2), 1–7. ISSN 2252-6765 Ari, G. (2016). Pengaruh pertumbuhan pendapatan asli daerah pertumbuhan belanja modal dan pertumbuhan ekonomi/PDRB terhadap fiscal stress pada kabupaten/kota di Sumatera Utara periode 2012-2014. USU Medan Armstrong, M. (2006). Performance management. Key strategies and practical guidelines (3rd Ed.). London and Philadelpia: Kogan page.http://doi.org/http://library.imtdubai.ac.ae/content%5Ce_books%5CE0016.pdf Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: the ultimate challenge. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049 Arnold, J., & Hope, A. (2012). Reporting business performance. Accounting and Business Research, 5(18), 96–105. http://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1975.9729070 Ashley,S; Maksl,A; & Craft, S. (2013). Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68(1) 7 –21. DOI:10.1177/1077695812469802 Asmoko, H. (2014). Evaluasi sistem pengukuran kinerja pemerintah pusat di Indonesia. Badan pendidikan dan pelatihan keuangan. Menteri keuangan Indonesia. http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/id/publikasi/artikel/150-artikelkeuangan-umum/19817-evaluasi-sistem-pengukuran-kinerja-pemerintah-pusatdiindonesia Awang, S. & Romle A.R. (2007). Isu-isu kontenporari pengurusan awam. Cetakan pertama. Pearson Prentice Hall. Selangor-Malaysia Ayensa, E. J., Menorca, L. G., & Servós, C. M. (2013). The challenge of quality for social third sector. cases analysis of EFQM model implementation. Cuadernos de Gestión, 13(2), 111–126. http://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.ll0285ea Azis, H,A. (2015, Mei 04). BPK: Tata kelola laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah masih banyak masalah. Kompas.com. http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/05/04/20210071/BPK.Tata.Kelola.Laporan.Keuangan.Pemerintah.Daerah.Masih.Banyak.Masalah. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2015). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah tahun 2015. Perwakilan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan dan Pembangunan Sumatera Utara. http://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/sumut/files/lakip%202015.pdf. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 9 Januari 2018. Badan Pusat Statistik .(2017). Survei angkatan kerja nasional. Subdit.Stat. Ketenagakerjaan Direktorat Diseminasi Statistik. https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/index.php/dasar/pdf?kd=5&th=2017 Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Gorontalo pada Tahun (2013). Tentang statistik pemerintah Kota Gorontalo. Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo. Tidak diterbitkan. Badan Pusat Statistik Nasional. (2018). Angka melek huruf (AMH). Subdit Rujukan Statistik. https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/index.php/indikator/313. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 17-06-2018. Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo Bagian Undang-Undang (2013). Tentang Data dokumen format permohonan Perlaksanaan Bajet. Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo. Tidak diterbitkan. Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo Bahagian Undang-Undang Tahun (2015). Tentang kawasan pentadbiran kerajaan Bandar Gorontalo. Tidak diterbitkan. Baker, R. (2014). Qualitative research in accounting & management article information: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(4), 1–10. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2014-0054 Balaboniene, I., & Vecerskiene, G. (2015). The aspects of performance measurement in public sector organization. In 20 th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management (Pp.314–320). Lithuania: Elsevier Ltd. http://www.icem.lt/index.php/icem/article/view/1701/0 Banerji, R., B, dan Shotland, M. (2017). The impact of mother literacy and participation programs on child learning: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in India. Cambridge, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (JPAL). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2017&issue=4&author=R.+Banerji&author=J.+Berry&author=M.+Shotland&title=The+impact+of+mother+literacy+and+participation+programs+on+child+learning. Banu, S., & Tansel, B. (2012). Improvement of data quality for post-closure care of landfills using a tiered decision matrix approach case studies. Waste Management and Research, 30(2), 171–180 Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2017). Understanding public performance measurement through theoretical pluralism article information : Public Sector Management, 30(1), 15–30. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2015-0202 Bastian, I. (2006). Akuntansi Sektor Publik : Suatu Pengantar. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta. Bawono,I., Halim, A., & Lord, B. (2015). Information and knowledge of public sector decision makers: experimental research in the context of a local government hospital in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 30(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.9956 Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322 Beisland, L., Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2015). Audit quality and corporate governance: evidence from the microfinance industry. International Journal of Auditing, 19(3), 218–237. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12041 Belle, N., & Ongaro, E. (2014). NPM, administrative reforms and public service motivation : improving the dialogue between research agendas. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80 (2), 382–400. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313514523 Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (4th Ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon. Bernardin, H. (2002). Human resource management: An experiential approach (Google Book). https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Human_Resource Bhatt, P. (2016). Performance of government linked companies and private owned companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Law and Management, 58(2), 150–161. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2014-0062 Bianci, C., & Xavier, J. (2016). The design and execution of performance management systems at state level: a comparative analysis of Italy and Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-12. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1191034 Biondi, L., & Lapsley, I. (2014). Accounting, transparency and governance: the heritage assets problem. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(2), 146–164. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0035 Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x Bjo¨rk, L., Szu¨cs, S., & Ha¨renstam, A. (2014). Measuring capacity to perform across local government services managers perceptions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(1), 26–38. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2012-0115 Blenkinsop, S., & Burns, N. (1992). Performance measurement revisited. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 12(10), 16–25. http://doi.org/org/10.1108/01443579210017213 Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation-from theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133–145. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008 Boetti, L., Piacenza, M., & Turati, G. (2012). Decentralization and local governments’ performance: how does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 68(3), 269–302. http://doi.org/10.1628/001522112X653840 Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theories and methods (5th Ed.). London: Pearson Education, Inc. Boubaker, S., Nguyen, B., & Nguyen, D. (2012). Corporate governance.recent development and new trends. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31579-4 Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. in The oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–208). http://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210439616 Bowrey, G., Hui, F., & Smark, C. (2017). An 1831 discussion on new public management. Accounting History,22(3),370-386. http://doi.org/10.1177/1032373216686086 Bracci, E., Gagliardo, E. ., & Bigoni, M. (2014). Performance management systems and public value strategy: a case study, in James Guthrie , Giuseppe Marcon , Salvatore Russo, Federica Farneti (Ed.). Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting, 3, 129–157. http://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020140000003006 Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. Sage Publication Ltd. ISBN: 978-01-84787-581-5 Brinkerhoff, D., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2015). Public sector management reform in developing countries : perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Administration And Development, 35(4), 222–237. http://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1739 Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing; understanding qualitative research. (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. New York Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: a conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 283–295. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004 Bruijn, H. (2002). Managing performance in the public sector (1st Ed.). London and New York: Routledge. Bruijn, H. (2007). Managing performance in the public sector (2nd Ed.). London and New York: Routledge. Brunsson, N. (1989a). Administrative reforms as routines. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5(3), 219–28. Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2013). From rhetoric to practice: the case of Spanish local government reforms. Financial Accounting dan Management, 29(4),0267–4424. 10.1111/faam.12019 Bryde, D. (2003). Modelling project management performance. project management Performance, 20(2), 229–254. http://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310456635 Budivera (2016). Permasalahan Dalam Penyusunan LAKIP. http://kampus4u.blogspot.my/2015/06/permasalahan-dalam-penyusunanlakip.html. Di muat turun pada tarikh 8-05-2018. Burns, J., Nixon, B., Lapsley,I., Ríos., A. (2015). Making sense of government budgeting: an internal transparency perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 12 (4), 377-394. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2015-0014 Buschor, E. (2013). Performance management in the public sector: past, current and future trends. t’ekhne. Review of Applied Management Studies, 11(1), 4-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.05.005 Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2),247–263.Http://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161. Busuioc, M., & Lodge, M. (2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91–100. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12612 Calton, J. M., Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L., & Bevan, D. (2013). Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development Pyramid. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 721–733.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1716-0 Calvo-mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldan, J. (2005). Relationships between the EFQM model criteria: a study in Spanish universities. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(6), 741–770. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/14783360500077708 Cepilovs, A., Drechsler, W., Lember, V., Kattel, R., Kalvet, T., & Tonurist, P. (2013). Can we measure public sector innovation ? a literature review. Lipse Project Paper, WP 6 Socia (2), 2–38. Chadha, N dan Wadhwa. (2018). Impact of an adult literacy programme on the personal and public lives of women impact of an adult literacy programme on the personal and public lives of women evidence from india. Journal of South Asian Development, 13(1). http://journals.sagepub.com.eserv.uum.edu.my/doi/pdf/10.1177/0973174118764930 Charbonneau, É., Bromberg, D. E., & Henderson, A. C. (2015). Performance improvement, culture, and regimes. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(2), 102–120.http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2014-0093 Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Vraimaki, E., & Diamantidis, A. (2013). Service quality in the public sector: the case of the citizen’s service centers of Greece. Prodromos Chatzoglou, Dimitrios Chatzoudes, Eftichia Vraimaki and Anastasios Diamantidis, 62(6),583–605.http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0140 Clasen, L.E. dan De Lopez, K.J. (2017). Bookfun – ‘there's more to it than reading a book’ – implementing a Danish early literacy programme that supports professionalism, language development and social inclusion. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17 (2), 254-279. Cokins, G. (2013). Enterprise performance management: making it work. EDPACS, 48(6), 11–21. http://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2014.865954 Cokins, J. (2004). Performance management finding the missing pieces. to close the intelligence gap (1st Ed.). Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Conaty, F. J. (2012). Performance management challenges in hybrid NPO/public sector settings: an Irish case. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(3), 290–309. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2012-0068. Copley, A. (2011). Essentials of accounting for governmental and not-for-profit organizations (9th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin Cordery, C., & Sinclair, R. (2013). Measuring performance in the third sector. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 10(3/4), 196–212. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0014 Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1981). MBO and goal directedness in a hospital context, Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 409–18. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Chosing among five approaches (3rd Ed.). London: Sage publication Inc. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177 Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Vranic, V. (2014). The riskiness of public sector performance measurement: a review and research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(3), 279–302. http://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12037 Dalci, I., & Kosan, L. (2012). Theory of constraints thinking-process tools facilitate goal achievement for hotel management: a case study of improving customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 21(5), 541–568. http://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2012.626751 Daly, J. (2012). Human resource management in the public sector policies and practices. (1st Ed.). New York: Routledge. Darling, S., & Cunningham, J. (2016). Underlying values and competencies of public and private sector managers. Asian Education and Development Studies,5(4),371-387.http://dx.doi.org.eserv.uum.edu.my/10.1108/AEDS-09-2015. Daum, H. J. (2003). Intangible assets and value creation. John Wiley & Sons,Inc. https://www.amazon.com/Intangible-Assets-Value-Creation-Juergen/dp/0470845120 Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180258 de Lancer Julnes, P. (2008). International handbook of practice-based performance management. USA. Sage Publication Inc. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QvnRNxN5llEC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=+de+Lancer+Julnes,+P.,+Berry,+F. de Lancer Julnes, P. (2013). Citizen-driven performance measurement: opportunities for evaluator collaboration in support of the new governance. New Directions for Evaluation, 137, 81–92. http://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20048 DeCenzo, D., & Robbins, S. (2004). Fundamental of human resource management (8th Ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Deis, D. R., & Giroux, G. a. (1992). Determinants of in audit sector quality the public. The Accounting Review, 67(3), 462–479 Deming, W. (1981). Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management. National Productivity Review, 1, 12–22. Denzin, N ., & Lincoln, Y. (2012). The sage handbook of qualitative research. (4th Ed.). Sage publication Inc. Retrieved from books.google.com.my/books?id=AmPgDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT1603&dq=Denzin,+N.+K.,+%26+Lincoln,+Y.+S.+(2012). Dimuat turun 30-12-2017 Denzin, N. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia 2008 tentang manajemen kinerja. menuju keunggulan organisasi berkinerja tinggi. Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.anggaran.depkeu.go.id/web-print-list.asp?ContentId=373. De-Vries, M. & Nemec, J. (2013). Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293408 Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2007). Kamus dewan. Dawaman Sdn.Bhd. Selangor Darul Ehsan. Kualalumpur. Diana, M. (2014). Measuring performance in the public sector: between necessity and difficulty. Studies in Business and Economics, 9(2), 40–50 Dickinson, G. (2008). Performance measurement and performance management of innovative products. Thesis Doctor Of Philosophy University of Bath. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17225/ Dimitropoulos, P., Ioannis, K., & Ioannis, D. (2017). Implementing the balanced scorecard in a local government sport organization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(3), 362–379. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2015-0167 Dinas Pendapatan Pengelolaan Keuangan Dan Asset Daerah Tahun 2013 tentang laporan realisasi anggaran dan pendapatan daerah 2007-2013 Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo. Dinas Pendapatan Pengelolaan Keuangan Dan Asset Daerah Tahun 2013 tentang tingkat otonomi keuangan pemerintah Kota Gorontalo Dirsmith, M. W., & Jablonsky, S. F. (1979). MBO political rationality and information inductance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 4(1/2), 39–52 Donald, L.H. (2013). Constitutional change and democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press Textbooks. ISBN:1-107-02727-6, 978-1-107-02727-5. Http://onesearch.id/SummonRecord/FETCH-LOGICAL-a26422-73b68ef05ce06cc1cc008b59f3dd59af4ef6feb7d3e3e7f497c835f4f978e74b3 Donaldson, L. (1985). In defence of organisation theory: a reply to the critics. (Google Book). https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=id&lr=&id=KBk4AAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=Donaldson,+L.,+1985 Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. Draghici, A., Popescu, A., & Gogan, L. (2014). A proposed model for monitoring organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124(0), 544–551. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.518 Dreveton, B. (2013). The advantages of the balanced scorecard in the public sector: beyond performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 33(2), 131–136. http://doi.org/org/10.1080/09540962.2013.763425 Eckerd, A., & Snider, K. (2017). Does the program manager matter? new public management and defense acquisition. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 36–57. http://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015596376. Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: a stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 545-565. Edstrom. (2009). Contoh-contoh indikator kinerja untuk satuan kerja perangkat daerah. Seri Keuangan dan Penganggaran. Local Government support program. https://swamandiri.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/contohcontoh_indikator_kinerja_untuk_skpd.pdf Ellingson, L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction (1st Ed.).London. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=HrO8BIycdfIC&pg=PR4&dq=Ellingson,+L.L.+(2009) English, L. M. (2007). Performance audit of Australian public private partnerships: legitimising government policies or providing independent oversight? Financial Accountability & Management, 23(3), 313–336. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00431.x Ewoh, A. I. (2011). Performance measurement in an era of new public management, 3 Nov., 1–14. http://doi.org/10.7885/1946-651X.1041 Fattore, G., Dubois, H., & Lapenta, A. (2012). Measuring new public management and governance in political debate. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 218–227. Fiorina, M.P. (1977) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. new haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. https://www.amazon.com/Congress-Keystone-Washington-Establishment-Perspectives/dp/0300046405 Fitzgerald, L. (1991). Performance measurement in service businessess. London: CIMA. https://www.academia.edu/3789840/performance_measurement. Flick, U. (2014). The sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. London: Sage publication.Inc. https://www.amazon.com/SAGE-Handbook-Qualitative-Data- Analysis Florez, R., Ramon, J. M., Velez, M., Alvarez-Dardet, M. C., & Sanchez, J. M. (2016). Performance assessment in the public sector–the issue of interpretation asymmetries and some behavioral responses. performance measurement and management control: Contemporary Issues Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 25(31), 353–386.http://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3512(2012)0000025011 Folz, D., Abdelrazek, R. and Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities: progress toward performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 33 (1) 63-87. Forzani, L dan Leu D.J (2017). Multiple perspectives on literacy as it continuously changes: reflections on opportunities and challenges when literacy is deictic. Reading Research Quarterly, 197 (2) 37-59.https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85 Fox, M. A., & Hamilton, R. T. (1994). ownership and diversification: agency theory or stewardship theory. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 69–81. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00333.x Francisco, L., & Alves, M.-C. (2012). Accounting information and performance measurement in a nonprofit organization, in Antonio davila, marc j. epstein, jean-françois manzoni (edition) performance measurement and management control: global issues. Managerial and Financial Accounting , 25, 465–487 Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34(7), 949–972. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613483655 Friese, S., & Ringmayr, T. G. (2012). Atlas.ti 7 quick tour, 1–73. Retrieved from http://atlasti.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/QuickTour_a7_en_07.pdf Fritz, J. (2016). How to talk about nonprofit impact from inputs to outcomes. non profit organization. Retrived from https://www.thebalance.com/inputs-outputsoutcomes-impact-what-s-the-difference-2502227. Dimuat turun 8 Januari 2018 Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(6), 478–498. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513550910982850 Gadda, K. R., & Dey, S. (2014). Business intelligence for public sector banks in India: a case study-design, development and deployment. Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 5(2), 37–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.520 Galih (21 Mei 1998). Berakhirnya kekuasaan orde baru. Kompas.com https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/05/21/06060041/21.Mei.1998.Berakhirnya.Kekuasaan.Soeharto.dan.Orde.Baru. Gao, J. (2015). Performance measurement and management in the public sector: some lessons from research evidence. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 86–96. http://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1704 Georgopoulos, B., & Tannenbaum, A. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22(5), 534-540. http://doi.org/10.2307/2089477. Ghobadian, A., & Ashworth, J. (1994). Performance measurement in local government–concept and practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14 (5), 35–51. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579410056786 Gioia, D., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151 Glynn, J.J. & Murphy, M.P. (1996). Public management failing accountabilities and failing performance review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9 (5-6),125-137 Goetsch L., & Davis, S. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence: introduction to total quality. (7th Ed.). USA. http://doi.org/British LibraryCataloguing- In Publication data Goh, S. C. (2012). Making performance measurement systems more effective in public sector organizations. Measuring Business Excellence,16(1),31–42. http://doi.org/10.1108/13683041211204653 Goldratt, E. (1990). What is this thing called the theory of constraints? New York: North River Press. Retrieved from http://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumGoldratt90WhatTOC.htm Golmohammadi, D., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Complexity and workload considerations in product mix decisions under the theory of constraints. Naval Research Logistics, 62(5), 357–369. http://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21632 Gomes, J., Romão, M., & Caldeira, M. (2013). The benefits management and balanced scorecard strategy map. International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance, 4(1), 44–54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jitbag.2013 Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689–706.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.004 Greiling, & Dorothea. (2005). Performance measurement in the public sector: the German experience. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 551–567. http://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510622223 Greiling, D., & Halachmi, A. (2013). Accountability and organizational learning in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 380–406.http://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360301 Greiling, D., & Stötzer, S. (2015). Performance accountability as a driver for changes in non profit government relationships: an empirical insight from Austria. Voluntas, 26(5), 1690–1717. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9609-8 Grizzle, G. A. (1985). Accountability for program implementation: can administrators and oversight bodies agree on the terms? Public Administration Quarterly, 9(2), 125–140. Http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7153068&site=ehost-live\npapers3://publication/uuid/1473AA3A-4755-416B-8D93-5CADE3FF4D9F Grosswiele, L., Röglinger, M., & Friedl, B. (2013). A decision framework for the consolidation of performance measurement systems. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1016–1029. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.027 Habibur, M. R., & Youssef, W. S. (2015). Public sector performance and leadership in the United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance, 224–232 Hafidh, A., (2013). Analisis rasio keuangan daerah dalam mempengaruhi belanja modal publik bagi pertumbuhan ekonomi. Jurnal Humaniora, 18(2), 109–120. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/viewFile/3154/2652 Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 502–516. http://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510622197 Halachmi, A. (2011). Imagined promises versus real challenges to public performance management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(1), 24–40. http://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111094295 Hammerschmid,G; Van de Walle,S; Andrews,R and Mohammed Sayed Mostafa, A. (2018). New public management reforms in Europe and their effects: findings from a 20-country top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632. Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research. controversies and contexts. (1st Ed.). London: Sage publication Inc. Retrieved from http://book4you.org/s/?q=Ethics+in+Qualitative+Research Hamzah (18 Maret 2004). Rakyat sengsara karena orde baru. Tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/40790/rakyat-sengsara-karena-orde-baru Hardinata. (2010). Partisipasi dan pemberdayaan masyarakat di era otonomi daerah. Jurnal Dinamika, 3 (6), 38-44. ISSN: 1979–0899X. http://jodfisipunbara.blogspot.com/2012/06/partisipasi-dan-pemberdayaanmasyarakat.html Harrison, J. A., Rouse, P., & De Villiers, C. J. (2012). Accountability and performance measurement: a stakeholder perspective. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 5(2), 243–258. http://doi.org/10.7835/jcc-berj-2012-0077 Heinle, M. S., Ross, N., & Saouma, R. E. (2014). A theory of participative budgeting. Accounting Review, 89(3), 1025–1050. http://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50686 Heinrich, C. (2003). Outcomes–based performance management in the public sector: implications for government accountability and effectivene. Public Administration Review 62(6) 712-725 · November 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00253 Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2016). Commonalities and differences in public and private sector performance management practices: a literature review in Marc J. Epstein, Frank Verbeeten, Sally K. Widener (ed.) performance measurement and management control. Managerial and Financial Accounting, 31, 309–351. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220160000031010 Hilb, M. (2012). New corporate governance.successful board management tools (4th Ed.). Springer-London New York. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23595-5 Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? public administration, 69(1), 3–19 Hopwood, A.G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation, empirical research in accounting. Jurnal of accounting research, 156-182. Hoque, Z. (2008). Measuring and reporting public sector outputs/outcomes. exploratory evidence from Australia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21 (5) 468‐93 Hourneaux, F., Carneiro-da-Cunha, A., & Hamilton, L. (2017). Performance measurement and management systems: different usages in Brazilian manufacturing companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 1–18. http://doi.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/MAJ-11-2015-1277 Huang, W., & Feeney, M. (2015). Citizen participation in local government decision making the role of manager motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36 (2), 188–209. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15576410 Hussein, N., Omar, S., Noordin, F.,Ishak, N.A. (2016). Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational innovativeness in a public institution of higher education in malaysia: a preliminary study. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30159-9 Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 7 pada Tahun 1999 tentang akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah, Pp1-4. http://jatim.kemenag.go.id/file/file/per.ttgPNS/. Ivanova, C., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Performance measurement models: an analysis for measuring innovation processes performance.Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 124, 397–404. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.416 Jääskeläinen, A., & Laihonen, H. (2014). A strategy framework for performance measurement in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 34(5), 355–362. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.945807 Jamaliah, S., & Nur Hidayah, J. (2014). Accountability in government linked companies: an empirical finding. In Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 145, 294–299. http://doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.037 Jang, J., & Park, N. (2015). Performance budgeting in Korea. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 14(3), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jrtl4wnm1r5 Jasmi, K. (2012). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan dalam kajian kualitatif. kursus penyelidikan kualitatif siri 1 2012 at Puteri Resort Melaka Johor Bahru, Negeri Johor Darul Ta’zim on 28-29 Mac 2012 (1–7). http://eprints.utm.my/41093/1/KamarulAzmiJasmi2012_Kesahan%26KebolehpercayaanKajianKualitatif.pdf. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 31 Dec.2017 Johnsen, Å. (2015). Strategic management thinking and practice in the public sector: a strategic planning for all seasons? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(3), 243–268. http://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12056 Johnson, T., & Kaplan, R. (1987). Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 0071032444,9780071032445 Jones, D. (2015). Infrastructure management in Singapore: privatization and government control. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(3), 299–311. http://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-12-2014-0064 Jowett, P., & Rothwell, M. (1988). Performance indicators in the public sectors (1st Ed.). Great Britain: The Macmillan Press LTD. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08987-1 Jurnali, T & Siti-Nabiha, A.K. (2015). Performance management system for local government: The Indonesian Experience. Global Business Review 16(3) 351–363. DOI: 10.1177/0972150915569923 Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. http://doi.org/00178012 Karasu, M.A., & Demir, M. (2012). Strategic planning and metropolitan municipality of performance based budgeting practices in Turkish. Journal of Faculty Of Economic And Administrative Sciences, 17(3), 339-349 Kattel, R., Cepilovs, A., Drechsler, W., Kalvet, T., Lember, V., & Tonurist, P. (2014). Can we measure public sector innovation ? A literature review. LIPSE Working Papers. http://www.lipse.org/upload/publications/Working paper 2 Kattel et al.pdf Keegan, D., Eiler, R., & Jones, C. (1989). Keegan, D., Eiler, R.G., & Jones, C.P. (1989). Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting Journal, 70(12), 45–50. http://search.proquest.com/docview/229823457?pqorigsite=gscholar Kenk, K., & Haldma, T. (2016). Performance management within the public accountability framework in Estonian local governments in: Zeitschrift Für Öffentliche Und Gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, 1(2), 102–113. http//:10.5771/0344-9777-2016-1-2-102 Kepala Lembaga Administrasi Negara No. 239/1X/6/8/2003. Tentang perbaikan pedoman penyusunan pelaporan akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. http://monev.bps.go.id/esakip/Pustaka/SK-LAN-239-2003-SAKIP.pdf Khandekar & Sharma. (2006). Organizational learning and performance: understanding Indian scenario in present global context. Education and Training, 48(8/9) 682-692. DOI: 10.1108/00400910610710092 Kipley, D., Lewis, A. O., & Jeng, J. (2012). Extending ansoff’s strategic diagnosis model: defining the optimal strategic performance positioning matrix. Sage Open, 2(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011435135 Klase, K. (2014). The effects of benchmarking of public works performance measures on the cost effectiveness of service delivery: evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Works Management & Policy, 19(3), 277–298. http://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X14531103 Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Aim and Structure of the Paper, 1–23. http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/75/153. Dimuat turun 27/2/2017 Koran Tempo 1 Mei (2011). Tingkat melek huruf. Indonesian companies news UNESCO. https://indonesiacompanynews.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/tingkatmelek-huruf Kravchuk, R dan Schack, R. (1996). Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the government performance and results act of 1993. Public Administration Review, 56, 348-358. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-18661828/designing-effectiveperformance-measurement-systems. Kroll, A. (2013). The other type of performance information: non routine feedback, its relevance and use. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 265–276. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02648.x Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. http://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469 Kroll, A., & Proeller, I. (2013). Modelling project management performance article information: International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26 (1) 74-85. Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 331–345. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372050 Kuhlmann, S., & Jäkel, T. (2013). Competing, collaborating or controlling? comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money and Management, 33(4), 269–276. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.799815 Lamnek, S. (2014). Qualitatives interview.Qualitative Sozialforschung, 301–371. http://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116 Laporan Realisasi Anggaran (2008-2013). Tentang autonomi keuangan Kerajaan Bandar Gorontalo. Dinas Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Aset Daerah Lapsley, I., & Ríos, A.-M. (2015). Making sense of government budgeting: an internal transparency perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(4), 377–394. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2015-0014 Latifah, L., & Sabeni, A. (2007). Faktor keprilakuan organisasi dalam implementasi sistem akuntansi keuangan daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X Unhas Makassar,26-28 Juli 2017,1–30.http://eprints.undip.ac.id/15176/1/ASPP-_13.pdf Leavy, P. (2014). The oxford handbook of qualitative research. ( Oxford University Press Inc. New York. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=Denzin,+N.+K.,+%26+Lincoln,+Y.+S.+(2012).22 Februari 2017 Lebar, O. (2012). Penyelidikan kualitatif; pengenalan kepada teori dan metod (Edisi Ke IV). Selangor-Kualalumpur: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Lebas, M. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1–3), 23–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X Lee, Y.T; Moon, J.Y. (2008). An exploratory study on the balanced scorecard model of social enterprise. Asian Journal on Quality, 9 (2), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982688200800014 Legewie, H. (2014). Atlas.ti-how it all began. atlas.ti user conference 2013:Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, 1–5. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-4828 Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation, 28(3), 403–421. http://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245 Leopold, A.C. (1998). Stewardship. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, 4, 225-32. https://www.elsevier.com/books/encyclopedia-of-applied-ethics/callahan/978-0-12-373632-1 Lewis, J. & Peter. (2012). Performance measurement: foundations, consequences and futures. the Australian and New Zealand School of Government University, Occational, 21, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312455993 Lidija, S., & Mende, S. (2016). Using the fourth generation balanced scorecard in the process of strategic planning in the public sector organizations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Strategic Management, 112–120 Linch, R., & Cross, K. (1995). Measure up!: yardsticks for continuous improvement (2nd Ed.). Amazon Lockwood, B., & Porcelli, F. (2013). Incentive schemes for local government: theory and evidence from comprehensive performance assessment in England. American Economic Journal Economic Policy, 5(3), 254–86 Lohan, G. (2013). A brief history of budgeting: reflections on beyond budgeting, its link to performance management and its appropriateness for software development. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 167, 81–105. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44930-7_6 Lorenz, C., & Wigger, B. (2012). The impact of performance budgeting on public spending in Germany’s Laender. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3483-3 Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior. an evidence-based approach (12th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Ma, L. (2016). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 23(163), 1–21. http://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/padm.12275 Mabin, V., Forgeson, S., & Green, L. (2001). Harnessing resistance :using the theory of constraints to assist change management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25 (2/3/4), 168–191. http//doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005446 MacIndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2013). How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofit: exploring and multidemensional measure. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 716–738 Maheshwari, D., & Janssen, M. (2012). Measuring organizational interoperability in practice: the case study of population welfare department of government of Sindh, Pakistan. In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Albany NY, United States- 22-25 Oktober 2012 Mahfud, M. (2000). Demokrasi dan konstitusi di Indonesia. Jakarta. Dienika Cipta. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=VSNAAAAMAAJ&q=Mahfud,+M.+(2000).+Demokrasi+dan+konstitusi+di+Indonesia.+Jakarta&dq=Mahfud,+M.+(2000).+Demokrasi+dan+konstitusi+di+Indonesia.+Jakarta&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiah5bjpTcAhXYQ30KHQ3qBWEQ6AEIKTAA Mahmudi. (2005). Manajemen kinerja sektor publik. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6365836-manajemen-kinerja-sektorpublik Mahsun, M. (2006). Pengukuran kinerja sektor publik. BPFE: Yogyakarta Maja, P., Matjaz, M., Jana, S., & Maja, M. (2015). Leadership and implementation of the EFQM excellence model in Slovenian higher education. Revija Za Univerzalno Odlicnost, 4(4), 155–170 Mari, L. (2003). Epistemology of measurement. in measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 34, 17–30. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00016-2 Marohaini, Y. (2013). Penyelidikan kualitatif: pengalaman kerja lapangan. (Edisi ke 5). Universiti Malaya. Kuala Lumpur-Malaysia Marr, B. (2008). Managing and delivering performance-how government, public sector and not-for-profit organisations can measure and manage what really matters. USA: Elsevier Ltd Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA. https://scholar.google.co.za/scholar?q=Marshall// Marti, C. (2013). Performance budgeting and accrual budgeting. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1),33–58.http://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370102 Martin, S., & Downe, J. (2014). Performance measurement of local public service networks. in James Guthrie , Giuseppe Marcon , Salvatore Russo , Federica Farneti (ed.) Public Value Management, Measurement And Reporting, 3, 43–64. http://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020140000003002 Marvel, J. D. (2016). Unconscious bias in citizens evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu053 Mathis, R., Jackson, J., Valentine, S., & Meglich, P. (2017). Human resource management. (15th Ed.). USA. Boston, MA 02210. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=ihBCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Robert+L.+Mathis,+John+H.+Jackson+2006.+Human+Resource+Management&hl Mayston, D. J. (1985). Non-profit performance indicators in the public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 1 (1), 51–73. McLeod, R. H., & Harun, H. (2014). Public sector accounting reform at local government level in indonesia. Financial Accountability and Management, 30(2), 238–258. http://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12035 Meek, L & Van Der Lee, J. (2005). Performance indicators for assessing and benchmarking research capacities in universities. APEID, UNESCO Bangkok Occasional Paper Series Paper No. 2. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001529/152960e.pdf Melnyk, S., Batitci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25 (2), 173–186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007 Menteri Keuangan 2015 tentang laporan kinerja Kementerian keuangan. Kemenkeu.go.id/sites/default/files/lakin_perjanian%20kinerja.pdf Menteri Keuangan Bagian Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan (2017). Republik Indonesia. http://www.djpk.depkeu.go.id/. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 09 Feb. 2017. Menteri Keuangan Nomor 168/PMK.05/ tahun (2015). Tentang mekanisme perlaksanaan anggaran bantuan pemerintah pada kementerian negara/Lembaga. https://www.indonesiaconsult.com/peraturan-menteri-keuangan-nomor-168pmk-052015/. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 10 Januari 2018. Merriam, S. (2009). A guide to design and implementation. Revised and expanded from Qualitative research and case study applications in education. (2nd Ed.). 989 Market Street, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass-Wiley. Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. (4th Ed.). San Francisco, CA. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=omQdCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Sharan+B.+Merriam Merrilees, B. (1977). Hidden unemployment of women in Australia: frictional, cyclical and structural dimensions. Journal of Industrial Relations, 19 (1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/002218567701900104 Meyer, C. (1994). How the right measures help teams excel. Harvard Business Review, 72 (3) https://hbr.org/1994/05/how-the-right-measures-help-teamsexcel. Mezias, S., & Fakhreddin, M. (2014). Building boundary capabilities at the base of the pyramid. The business school for the word, 30 Januari 2014. http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2014-0022 Micheli, P., & Mari, L. (2013). The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 147–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.005 Michiel, D. (2010). The importance of neglect in policy making. publ. Palgrave, Mac Millan, London, New York.http://www.palgrave.com/jp/book/9780230242906 Michiel, D., & Juraj, N. (2013). Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4-16. Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. a methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). London: Sage publication Inc Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x Mills, A., Europas, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. London: Sage publication Inc. Retrieved from http://book4you.org/ireader/844332 Miner, J. (2015). Organizational behavior. from theory to practice (4th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=XnKsBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA93&dq=Luthans+2005.+organizational+behavior&hl=id&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Luthans 2005. organizational behavior&f=false. Mir, F. ., & Pinnington, A. (2013). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management 5(12), 1–16. http://doi.org/org/10.1016/j.ijproman Mir, F., & Pinnington, A. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32,202–217. http://doi.org/org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012 Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector:a research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(1), 39–55. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.x Modell, S. (2009). Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: a review and assessment. Financial Accountabilty and Management, 25(2), 197–224. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.x Morgan, G. G., & Fletcher, N. J. (2013). Mandatory public benefit reporting as a basis for charity accountability: findings from England and Wales. Voluntas, 24(3), 805–830. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9372-7 Morrison, L. (2016). Literature review: measuring and assessing organizational performance for non-profits, contextually sensitive standards and measures for the non-profit organization. Governance and Performance in Public and Non- Profit Organizations, 5,233–256.http://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020160000005010 Mosse, R. (1996). Performance Monitoring Indicators Handbook. world bank technical paper NO.334. Washington. U.S.A. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BRAZILINPOREXTN/Resources/3817166-1185895645304/4044168-1186409169154/24pub_br217.pdf Moynihan, D. (2013). Advancing the empirical study of performance management: what we learned from the program assessment rating tool, 43 (5), 499–517. http://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013487023 Mulgan, R. (1997). The processes of public accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56 (1) 25-36. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01238.x Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability. an ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00218 Mulyana. (2015). Laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah tahun 2015 perwakilan BPKP provinsi sumatera utara badan pengawasan keuangan dan pembangunan. http://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/sumut/files/lakip%202015.pdf. Murray, L.W., & Efendioglu, A.V. (2011). Budgeting for city and county government: How performance based budgeting could have reduced budget deficits. Business and managemenet review, 1(9), 13-22. Naor, M., Bernardes, E. S., & Coman, A. (2013). Theory of constraints: is it a theory and a good one? International Journal of Production Research, 51(2), 542–554. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.654137 Nath, N., & Sharma, U. (2014). Performance management systems in the public housing sector: dissemination to diffusion. Australian Accounting Review, 24(1), 2–20. http://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12004 Nave, D. (2002). How to compare six sigma, lean and the theory of constraints. Quality Progress, 35(3), 73–78.Retrieved from https://www.lean.org/Search/Documents/242.pdf Nederhand, J., & Klijn, E. (2017). Stakeholder involvement in public–private partnerships : it is influence on the innovative character of projects and on project performance. Administration & Society, 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716684887 Neely, A., Adams, C., & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 6–13. http://doi.org/10.1108/13683040110385142 Newton, L.H. (1997). Stewardship, in werhane, P.H. and freeman, R.E. (Eds), the blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of business ethics, blackwell business, oxford Niven, P. (2008). Balanced scorecard: step-by-step for government and nonprofit agencies. Non Profit Organisation. (2nd Ed.). New Jersey Noore, A. (2010). Managing for results: lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 38–53. http://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/09513551011012312 Norazlina, I., Nik Kamaruzaman, A., & Nafsiah, M. (2016). Management control system and performance :accountability attributes in local authorities. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4s), 26–35. http://eserv.uum.edu.my/docview/1809612418?accountid=42599 Norshuhadah, S., & Shahizan, H. (2010). Design research in software development. Sintok: UUM Press Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198–220. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2015-0035 Oakland, J. S., & Tanner, S. J. (2008). The relationship between business excellence and performance an empirical study using Kanji’s leadership excellence model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19(7–8), 733–749. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802159402 Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. Ouchi, W.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833-48. Overton, A. G. (2017). Family literacy bags: a rural-appalachian approach for parental involvement and education (Order No. 10602762). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2013193754). Retrieved from http://eserv.uum.edu.my/docview/2013193754?accountid=42599 Pandey, S. (2010). Cutback management and the paradox of publicness. Public Administration Review 70(4), 564–571. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02177.x Parmenter, D. (2015). Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. (Google Books Version (3rd Ed.). Wiley & sons, Inc.Hoboken, New Jersey. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=id&lr=&id=bKkxBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA101&dq=How+Can+We+Better+Manage+performance+2015 Parsons, Gokey & Monica. (2013). Indicators of inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts in security and justice programming. Department for International Development. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/304626/Indicators.pdf Pasolong, H. (2014). Kepemimpinan. administrasi publik. Yogyakarta.Percetakan Offset Andi 55281. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation method. (4th Ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.ISBN: 978-1-4129-7212-3 Paulus, T., & Jessica, N. (2016). Atlas.ti for conversation and discourse analysis studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 405–428. http://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1021949 Paulus, T., Woods, M., Atkins, D. ., & Macklin, R. (2017). The discourse of Qdas: reporting practices of Atlas.ti. International Journal Of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 35–47.http://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454 Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo pada Tahun (2008). Tentang rencana pembangunan jangka menengah 2008-2013. Tidak diterbitkan. Peraturan Pemerintah No.58 pada Tahun (2005). Tentang pengelolaan keuangan daerah. https://kamoenyo.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/penjelasan-peraturanpemerintah-nomor-58-tahun-2005-tentang-pengelolaan-keuangan-daerah/. Dimuat turun tarikh 28 Des 2017. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 59 Tahun (2007). Tentang perubahan atas peraturan menteri dalam negeri No. 13 Tahun 2006 tentang pedoman pengelolaan keuangan daerah. http:///www /2011/03/permendagri-no-59-tahun-2007-tentang.html. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 900 Tahun (1980). Tentang manual administrasi keuangan daerah. https://www.scribd.com/document/358409556/Regulasi Akuntansi- Sektor-Publik. Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara No. 29 pada Tahun (2010). Tentang pedoman penyunan LAKIP. https://dokumen.tips/documents/permenpan-nomor-29-tahun-2010-tentangpedoman-penyusunan-lakip.html. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 29-12-2017. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara No. 25 pada Tahun (2012). Tentang petunjuk perlaksanaan evaluasi akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. http://ngada.org/bn589-2012.htm. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 36 pada Tahun (1972). Stelsel kas. pengelolaan, pertanggungjawaban dan pengawasan keuangan daerah, Pp 1-23. http://jdih.surabaya.go.id/pdfdoc/pp_58.pdf. Dimuat turun tarikh 10 Feb. 2017. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 78 pada Tahun (2007). Tentang tata cara pembentukan, penghapusan, dan penggabungan daerah. Pp 1-24. http://docplayer.info/32734126-Peraturan-pemerintah-republik-indonesianomor-78-tahun-2007-tentang-tata-cara-pembentukan-penghapusan-danpenggabungan-daerah.html. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 2 Januari 2018. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 8 pada Tahun (2006). Tentang pelaporan keuangan dan kinerja instansi pemerintah. https://www.slideshare.net/perencanakota/pp8-2006-pelaporan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun (2008). Tentang sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah.http://peraturan.go.id/pp/nomor-60-tahun-2008- Peraturan Presiden No.29 pada Tahun (2014). Tentang sistem akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia, pp 1-11. http://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/perpres2014_029.pdf Philip, A. (2004). A human rights perspective on the millennium development goals. contributed paper to the work of the millennium project task force on poverty and economic development. http://www.appgpopdevrh.org.uk/Publications/Population%20Hearings/Evidence/UNHCHR%20report%202.pdf Phillips, J. (1999). Accountability in human resource management (1st Ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company. Poister, H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organization.San Francisco,CA.: Jossey-Bass-Wiley. https://www.amazon.com/Measuring-Performance-Public-Nonprofit-Organizations/dp/078794999X Poister, T. H., Aristigueta, M. P., & Hall, J. L. (2015). Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations: an integrated approach. Retrieved from www.josseybass.com\nwww.wiley.com Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms: public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy, 32(1), 17–31. http://doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.32.2010.1.3 Pollitt, C. (2013). Back in the OECD. an oblique comment on the World Bank’s better results from public sector institutions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 406–412. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313490580 Pollitt, C., Thiel, S. van, & Vincent, H. (2007). New public management in Europe adaptation and alternatives. Great Britain: Palgrave-Macmillan. Posayanant, S., & Chareonngam, C. (2010). Prototype KPIs for rural infrastructure development the practice of sub-district local governments. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59 (8), 717-733. http://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011089436 Prasojo, E. (2014, Nopember, 25). Tantangan birokrasi pemerintahan Jokowi-JK. Kompas.com. http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/11/25/12000021/Tantangan.Birokrasi.Pemerintahan Primarisanti, H., & Akbar, R. (2015). Factors influencing the success of performance measurement: evidence from local government. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 30(1),56-71. Retrieved from http://eserv.uum.edu.my/docview/1786618311?accountid=42599 Pusat Rujukan Persuratan Melayu. (2018). Gerbang maya dewan bahasa dan pustaka Malaysia. http://prpmv1.dbp.gov.my/. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 5 Januari 2018 Rachim, A. (2015). Analyzing local revenue in local otonomy implementation towards self-eliance of Samarinda municipality. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 6(6), 436–441. Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement. accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press. Washington. DC. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=b9JEqKA5RBcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Radin,+B.+(2006).+Challenging+the+performance+movement.&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjQy7XG15TcAhVMbysKHXGJCdMQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Radin%2C%20B.%20(2006).%20Challenging%20the%20performance%20movement.&f=false Radnor, Z. (2008), Muddled, massaging, manoeuvering or manipulated? a typology of organizational gaming. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57 (4) 316‐28. Rahmayani, S. (2010). Pengaruh penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja dan keadilan prosedural terhadap kinerja manajerial SKPD (studi kasus pada pemerintah kabupaten Serdang Bedagai).Thesis Sekolah Pascasarjana USU Medan. Rajnoha, R., Lesníková, P., & Korauš, A. (2016). From financial measures to strategic performance measurement system and corporate sustainability. Empirical evidence from Slovakia, 9(4), 134–152. http://doi.org/DOI:10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/8 Ramadass, S., Sambasivan, M., & Xavier, J. (2017). Critical factors in public sector collaboration in Malaysia: leadership, interdependence, and community., 30(5), 1–34. http://doi.org/org.eserv.uum.edu.my/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2016-0167 Rand, G. (2000). Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management 18(3):173-177. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00019-8 Randa, F., & Paledung, S. (2013). Memahami perlaksanaan desentralisasi fiskal dan pendapatan asli daerah. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 11(1), 53–81. Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2014). Performance audit and the importance of the public debate. Evaluation, 20(3), 368–385 Republik Indonesia. (1945-1966). Sistem pemerintahan orde lama.http://patriceshare.blogspot.my/2015/03/sistem-pemerintahan-orde-lama-orde-baru.html. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 4 Januari 2018 Republik Indonesia. (1966-1999). Sistem pemerintahan orde baru.http://patriceshare.blogspot.my/2015/03/sistem-pemerintahan-orde-lama-orde-baru.html. Dimuat turun pada tarikh 2 Januari 2018. Republika Online (19-08-2016). Dana transfer 2017 dipangkas, daerah cemas. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/koran/halaman-1/16/08/19/oc5cw315-danatransfer-2017-dipangkas-daerah-cemas Richards, L., & Morse, J. (2013). Qualitative methods (3rd Ed.). USA. Sage publication Inc. Ridder, H., & Hoon, C. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: qualitative methods in research on human resource management. Human Resource Management, 23(2), 93–106. http://doi.org/DOI 10.1688/1862-0000_ZfP_ 2009_02_Ridder.

Keberkesanan perlaksanaan model pengukuran prestasi kerajaan berasaskan model LAKIP : kajian kes ke atas kerajaan bandar Gorontalo, Indonesia

Similar Items