Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia

Partial and disproportinate distribution of zakat among the eight asnaf and various distributions among zakat institutions in Malaysia caused the community to lose confidence and dissatisfied with the management of zakat institutions. This problem has inspired the researcher to conduct this study. T...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2018
Subjects:	BP Islam Bahaism Theosophy, etc
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/1/s92929_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/2/s92929_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.7739
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Md Idris, Kamil Abd Aziz, Saliza
topic	BP Islam Bahaism Theosophy, etc
spellingShingle	BP Islam Bahaism Theosophy, etc Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
description	Partial and disproportinate distribution of zakat among the eight asnaf and various distributions among zakat institutions in Malaysia caused the community to lose confidence and dissatisfied with the management of zakat institutions. This problem has inspired the researcher to conduct this study. This study aims to explain the form of zakat distribution, identify and determine the factors that influence the zakat distribution priority to asnaf made by zakat institutions. In achieving these objectives, a field study was carried out using structured questionnaires involving all the 14 zakat institutions which was represented by members of committee involved in zakat distribution. Using logistic regression analysis, this study found that two independent variables have significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf, namely economic status and political pressure. Economic status was found to have a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf mualaf. This positive relationship is due to the concern of zakat institutions against the rising of apostasy cases. Political pressure also has a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf amil but its relationship is negative. Zakat institutions are seen to be more careful in the distribution of zakat to asnaf amil so that they will not be accused of misusing zakat fund and free from political influence. Furthermore, political pressure was found to have a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf al-gharimin. This positive relationship shows that the zakat institutions’ effort to co-operate with the government in dealing with debt problems among the people. Some management implications are suggested in this study to ensure the distribution of zakat to asnaf is made thoroughly and balanced. In summary, this study supports the theory of distribution justice and suggests that this theory to be extended in future studies.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman
author_facet	Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman
author_sort	Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman
title	Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
title_short	Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
title_full	Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
title_fullStr	Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia
title_sort	faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di malaysia
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA)
publishDate	2018
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/1/s92929_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/2/s92929_02.pdf
_version_	1747828257171963904
spelling	my-uum-etd.77392021-08-09T04:35:53Z Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia 2018 Aryati Juliana, Sulaiman Md Idris, Kamil Abd Aziz, Saliza Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA) Tunku Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA) BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc Partial and disproportinate distribution of zakat among the eight asnaf and various distributions among zakat institutions in Malaysia caused the community to lose confidence and dissatisfied with the management of zakat institutions. This problem has inspired the researcher to conduct this study. This study aims to explain the form of zakat distribution, identify and determine the factors that influence the zakat distribution priority to asnaf made by zakat institutions. In achieving these objectives, a field study was carried out using structured questionnaires involving all the 14 zakat institutions which was represented by members of committee involved in zakat distribution. Using logistic regression analysis, this study found that two independent variables have significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf, namely economic status and political pressure. Economic status was found to have a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf mualaf. This positive relationship is due to the concern of zakat institutions against the rising of apostasy cases. Political pressure also has a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf amil but its relationship is negative. Zakat institutions are seen to be more careful in the distribution of zakat to asnaf amil so that they will not be accused of misusing zakat fund and free from political influence. Furthermore, political pressure was found to have a significant relationship with the priority of zakat distribution to asnaf al-gharimin. This positive relationship shows that the zakat institutions’ effort to co-operate with the government in dealing with debt problems among the people. Some management implications are suggested in this study to ensure the distribution of zakat to asnaf is made thoroughly and balanced. In summary, this study supports the theory of distribution justice and suggests that this theory to be extended in future studies. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/1/s92929_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7739/2/s92929_02.pdf text eng public https://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1698792~S1 Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab. Rahim, Z. (2007). Pengurusan zakat kontemporari. Jurnal Pengurusan JWZH, 1(1), 13–22. Abd Halim, M. N., Mohamed Saladin, A. R., Rozman, M. Y., Siti Mariam, A., & Rashidah, A. R. (2015). Efficiency of Islamic institutions: Empirical evidence of zakat organizations’ performance in Malaysia. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.195. Abdul Hakim Amir, O. (2007). Potensi pembayar dan kutipan zakat di Malaysia: In Persidangan Zakat & Cukai Peringkat Kebangsaan. Abu Sufian, A. B. (2006). Baitulmal dan kemiskinan di Kuala Lumpur: Program agihan zakat dalam bentuk perniagaan. Zakat: Pensyariatan, Perekonomian Dan Perundangan, (206), 228–256. Ahmad Fahme, M. A., Zakariah, A. R., Fuadah, J., & Muhammad Ridhwan, A. A. (2015). The effectiveness of zakat in reducing poverty incident: An analysis in Kelantan, Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 11(21), p355. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p355. Aidit, G. (1988). Zakat satu tinjauan. Selangor, Malaysia: IBS Buku Sdn Bhd. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. Al-Quran dan Terjemahan. (2009). Selangor, Malaysia: Yayasan Restu. Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825655. Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder Jr, J. M. (2006). Party control of state government and the distribution of public expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(4), 547–569. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00030-4. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica, 44(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401. Asmadi, M. N. (2006). Kesahan pemotongan caruman KWSP gaji pekerja dan zakat caruman KWSP: Suatu kajian semula menurut perspektif perundangan Islam. In Zakat: Persyariatan, Perekonomian dan Perundangan (pp. 350–358). Bangi: Penerbit UKM. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire (Form 5X). In Mindgarden, Redwood City, CA. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789. Azizah, D., & Abd Halim, M. N. (2009). Kaitan zakat dan cukai di Malaysia. In M. N. Abd Halim, M. S. Ariffin, N. Rawi, M. S. Mastura, & T. Siti Nor Hidayah (Eds.), Pengintegrasian zakat & cukai: Menerajui kecemerlangan zakat. Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA). Azman, A. R., Mohammad, A., & Syed Mohd Najib, S. O. (2012). Zakat institution in Malaysia: Problems and issues. Gjat, 2(1), 35–41. Azman, I., Mohd Hamran, M., Hassan Al-Banna, M., Nurhana, M. R., & Karen, Z. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership styles as a predictor of individual outcomes. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 17(6), 89–104. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovation in banking: Does the composition of the top management make a difference. Strategic Management Journal, 10(Special Issue), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709. Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R & D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130. Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2009). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.2307/2064114. Berthélemy, J. (2006). Bilateral donors’ interest vs. recipients’ development motives in aid allocation: Do all donors behave the same? Review of Development Economics, 10(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00311.x. Berthelemy, J. C., & Tichit, A. (2004). Bilateral donors’ aid allocation decisions: A three-dimensional panel analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13(3), 253–274. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2000, April). Does media make government more responsive? Theory and evidence from Indian famine relief policy. In International Monetary Fund Seminar Series (Vol. 10, pp. 1-40). Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm012. Blom-Hansen, J., Monkerud, L. C., & Sørensen, R. (2006). Do parties matter for local revenue policies? A comparison of Denmark and Norway. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00305.x. Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the role of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(December), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.13. Brauninger, T. (2005). A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice, 3/4, 409–429. Brown, R. D. (1995). Party cleavages and welfare effort in the American states. The American Political Science Review, 89(1), 23–33. Buchanan, R. J., Cappelleri, J. C., & Ohsfeldt, R. L. (1991). The social environment and Medicaid expenditures: Factors infuencing the level of state Medicaid spending. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 67–73. Budge, I. (2001). Validating Party Policy Placements. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401230087. Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkancz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001. Chaganti, R., & Sambharya, R. (1987). Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080409. Chen, C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-US comparison. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 408–428. Chuang, T.-T., Nakatani, K., & Zhou, D. (2009). An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: An application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(1/2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390910932821. Coakes, S. J. (2011). SPSS : Analysis without Anguish:Version 18.0 for Windows (Eighteen). Milton: John Wiley & Sons. Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2002). Aid allocation and poverty reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1475–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00187-8. Comiskey, M. (1993). Electoral competition and the growth of public spending in 13 industrial democracies, 1950 to 1983. Comparative Political Studies, 26(3), 350–374. Conlon, D. E., Porter, C. O. L. H., & MacLean Parks, J. (2004). The fairness of decision rules. Journal of Management, 30(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.04.001. Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1983), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.001245. Cooray, N. S., & Shahiduzzaman, M. (2004). Determinants of Japanese aid allocation: An econometric analysis. International Development Series, 4, 1–19. Dawson, P., & Dobson, S. (2010). The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: Evidence from the behaviour of referees. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.06.001. Dawson, R. E., & Robinson, J. A. (1963). Inter-party competition, economic variables and welfare policies in the American States. The Journal of Politics, 25(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2128007. Dohmen, T. J. (2008). The influence of social forces: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00112.x. Economic Planning Unit. (2011). Rancangan Malaysia Ke 10. Prime Minister's Department, Putrajaya. Eza Ellany, A. L., Mohd Rizal, P., & Mohamat Sabri, H. (2014). Prestasi kecekapan agihan kewangan dan bukan kewangan di kalangan institusi zakat di Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 48(2), 51–60. Fabricant, S., & Lipsey, R. E. (1952). Trends of government activity in the United States since 1990. New York. Faravelli, M. (2007). How context matters: A survey based experiment on distributive justice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7–8), 1399–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.01.004. Ferreira, F., & Gyourko, J. (2009). Do political parties matter? Evidence from U.S. cities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 399–422. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (Third Ed). London: Sage Publication. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2010). Top-management-team tenure and organiza- tional outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion, 35(3), 484–503. Fisher, G. W. (1961). Determinants of states and local government expenditure: A preliminary analysis. National Tax Journal, 14, 349–355. Fisher, G. W. (1964). Interstate variation in state and local government expenditure. National Tax Journal, 17(1), 57–74. Flanagin, A. J. (2000). Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 618–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00771.x. Garand, J. C. (1985). Partisan change and shifting expenditure priorities in the American states, 1945-1978. American Politics Quarterly, 13(4), 355–391. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S. (2001). Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27, 3–21. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(February), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009X. Grogan, C. M. (1994). Political-economic factors influencing state medicaid policy. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 589–622. Hair, J. ., Black, W. ., Babin, B. ., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis - A global perspective (Seventh ed.). New Jersey: Pearson. Hairunnizam, W., & Radiah, A. K. (2010). Localization of Malaysian zakat distribution: Perceptions of amil and zakat recipients. In Seventh International Conference - The Tawhidi Epistemology: Zakat and Waqf Economy, Bangi 2010 (pp. 461–484). Hairunnizam, W., Sanep, A., Mohd Ali, M. N., & Maryam, A. R. (2016). Prestasi kecekapan pengurusan kewangan dan pengurusan agihan zakat: Perbandingan antara Majlis Agama Islam Negeri. In Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia (pp. 8–9). Hairunnizam, W., Sanep, A., & Radiah, A. K. (2009a). Pengagihan zakat oleh institusi zakat kepada lapan asnaf: Kajian di Malaysia. In Seminar Kebangsaan Ekonomi Islam 2008/09 pada 10-11 Februari 2009 di APIUM (pp. 1–17). Hairunnizam, W., Sanep, A., & Radiah, A. K. (2009b). Pengagihan zakat oleh institutusi zakat di Malaysia: Mengapa masyarakat Islam tidak berpuas hati? Jurnal Syariah, 17(1), 89–112. Hairunnizam, W., Sanep, A., & Radiah, A. K. (2012). Melokalisasikan urus tadbir pengagihan zakat: Peranan institusi masjid di Malaysia. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 83(3), 71–83. Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. S. (1991). The Seasons of a CEO Tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/258978. Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(January), 401–418. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. Hanno, D. M., & Violette, G. R. (1996). An analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behavior. Behavioral research in Accounting, 8, 57-75. Hassan, M. K., & Khan, J. M. (2007). Zakat, external debt and poverty reduction strategy in Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 28(4), 1–38. Havick, J. J. (1975). The determinants of state revenue sharing expenditures. The Journal of Politics, 37(2), 548–554. Herne, K., & Suojanen, M. (2004). The role of information in choices over income distributions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703262859. Hook, J., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 429–445. Hook, S. W., Taylor, B., & Schraeder, P. J. (1998). Clarifying the foriegn aid puzzle: A comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish aid floes. World Politics, 50(2), 294–323. Hoover, G. A., & Pecorino, P. (2005). The political determinants of federal expenditure at the state level. Public Choice, 123(1–2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-7524-z. Hwang, A. S., & Gray, V. (1991). External limits and internal determinants of state public policy. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 277–298. Institusi zakat dipertikai. (2001). Utusan Online. Retrieved January 13, 2010. JAWHAR. (2007). Manual pengurusan agihan zakat. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from http://intranet.jawhar.gov.my/penerbitan/public/page_detail.php?id=73. JAWHAR. (2017). Statistik agihan zakat mengikut negeri. Retrieved June 10, 2017 from http://intranet.jawhar.gov.my/spmj/public/zkt_agihan_stat.php. Jeewon, C., & Stacey, K. (2008). Employees’ distributive justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors: A social exchange perspective. Review of Business Research, 8(6), 131–138. Jehle, G. (1994). Zakat and inequality: Some evidence from Pakistan. Review of Income and Wealth, 40(2), 205–217. Jennings Jr, E. (1979). Competition, constituencies and welfare policies in American states. The American Plolitical Science Review, 73(2), 414–429. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755. Kamil, M. I. (2002). Gelagat kepatuhan zakat gaji di kalangan kakitangan awam. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Kamil, M. I. (2006). Kesan persepsi undang-undang dan penguatkuasaan zakat terhadap gelagat kepatuhan zakat pendapatan gaji. Journal of Ethics, Legal and Governance, 2, 32–41. Kenworthy, L. (1999). Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national asessment. Social Forces, 77(3), 1119–1139. Kerajaan belum bercadang menyelaraskan agihan zakat. (2009). Utusan Malaysia. Retrieved April 16, 2010. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1992). Parables of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 70(4), 123–128. Konow, J. (1996). A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31, 13–35. Konow, J. (2001). Fair and square: The four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00194-9. Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103771800013. Konow, J. (2009). Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice. Social Choice and Welfare, 33(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0348-2. Laporan Tahunan BNM 2016. (2017). Retrieved July 30, 2017, from http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=bm_publication&pg=bm_ar&ac=39&bm. Lembaga Zakat Negeri Kedah. (2017). Retrieved July 30, 2017, from https://www.zakatkedah.com.my/index.php/penerima-zakat/#1479873406496-4d0d233a-2ae2. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In & R. H. W. (Eds. . S. K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg (Ed.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum. Lipmeyer, C. S. (2002). Parties and policy: Evaluating economic and partisan influences on welfare policy. British Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 641–661. Llavador, H. G., & Roemer, J. E. (2001). An equal-opportunity approach to the allocation of international aid. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00128-0. Mahmood, Z. (2003). Pengurusan zakat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mahyuddin, A. B., & Abd Ghani, A. (2011). Towards achieving the quality of life in the management of zakat distribution to the rightful recipients (the poor and needy). International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 237–246. MAIWP. (2010). Definisi asnaf zakat. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://maiwp.gov.my/index.php/perkhidmatan/bantuan-zakat-maiwp/358.html. MAIWP, P. P. Z. (2009). Laporan Zakat 2009. Kuala Lumpur. Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor. (2017). Retrieved July 30, 2017, from http://www.maij.gov.my/?page_id=401. Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative - liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3. McGillivray, M., & White, H. (1993). Explanatory studies of aid allocation among developing countries: A critical survey (No. 18942). International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague. Md Hairi, M. H., Kamil, M. I., & Ram Al Jaffri, S. (2012). Ketelusan di dalam tadbir urus institusi zakat. In Seminar Isu-Isu Kontemporari Zakat di Malaysia (pp. 63–74). Langkawi, Kedah: Pusat Islam, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Md Zyadi, M. T., & Mariam, A. M. (1999). Prestasi kutipan dan agihan zakat di Malaysia: Suatu perbandingan antara pengurusan awam dengan pengurusan swasta. In Pascasidang Seminar Pengeluaran Awam dan Swasta: Justifikasi dan Realiti di Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor (pp. 293–306). Meindl, J. R. (1989). Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives, and leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(2), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989898. Michelbach, P. A., Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Doing Rawls Justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 523–539. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordóñez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.629. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Newman, D. G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). Experiments behind the veil: Structural influences on judgments of social justice. Political Psychology, 24(3), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00339. Mogull, R. G. (1993). Determinants of states’ welfare expenditures. Journal of Socio-Economics, 22(3), 259–276. Mohd Asri, Z. A. (2009). Agama bukan candu untuk mengkhayalkan orang miskin. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from http://drmaza.com/home/?p=1228. Mohd Harzrul, A. (2010). Institusi agama tercabar. Harian Metro, p. 9. Retrieved August 16, 2011. Mohd Hasriq, A. (2011). Hanya 45% bayar zakat. Utusan Malaysia, p. 7. Retrieved August 18, 2011. Mohd Parid, S. A. (2001). Kaedah pengagihan dana zakat: Satu perspektif Islam. In N. H. Nik Mustapha (Ed.), Kaedah pengagihan dana zakat: Satu perspektif Islam . Kuala Lumpur: IKIM. Mohd Radzi, M. Z. (2009, September 18). Hak zakat golongan mualaf. Utusan Malaysia. Retrieved September 4, 2010. Muhammad Syukri, S. (2002). Lokalisasi dan kolektivisi zakat: Satu cadangan teoritis. Muzakarah Pakar Zakat Anjuran Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia., 1–15. Muhammad Yusri, M (2017). CEO, pegawai Zakat Pulau Pinang didakwa rasuah. BH Online. Retrieved 8 February 2018. Mujaini, T. (2009). Memantapkan pelaksanaan agihan zakat oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia: Satu saranan penambahbaikan. Jurnal Pengurusan JAWHAR, 3(1), 55–71. Murphy-Berman, V., & Et Al. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1267. Musa, A., Abd Halim, M. N., Mujaini, T., Hasan, B., & Syawal, K. (2006). Perlaksanaan agihan zakat di Malaysia: Satu kaedah pengukuran prestasi. In I. Abd Ghafar & M. T. Hailani (Eds.), Zakat: Persyariatan, Perekonomian dan Perundangan (1st ed., pp. 201–212). Penerbit UKM. Musteen, M., Barker, V. L., & Baeten, V. L. (2006). CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.008. Neumayer, E. (2003a). Do human rights matter in bilateral aid allocation? A quantitative analysis of 21 donor countries. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8403010. Neumayer, E. (2003b). The determinants of aid allocation by regional multilateral development banks and United Nations agencies. International Studies Quarterly, 47, 101–122. Neumayer, E. (2003c). What factors determine the allocation of aid by Arab countries and multilateral agencies? Journal of Development Studies, 39(4), 134. https://doi.org/10.1080/713869429. Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261–272. Nik Mustapha, N. H. (2001). Semangat pengagihan zakat ke arah pembangunan ekonomi. In Kaedah pengagihan dana zakat: Satu perspektif Islam. Kuala Lumpur: IKIM. Norazlina, A. W., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2011a). A framework to analyse the efficiency and governance of zakat institutions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590811111129508. Norazlina, A. W., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2011b). Efficiency of zakat institutions and its determinants. 8th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance, (October), 1–19. Norliza, W. (2008, November 8). Majlis agama perlu hebah agihan zakat. Berita Harian. Retrieved December 7, 2009. Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and Practise. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage. Owyang, M. T., & Zubairy, S. (2008). The regional variation in the response to government spending shocks. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper. Owyang, M. T., & Zubairy, S. (2010). Who benefits from increased government spending? A state level analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(3), 445–464. Painter, G., & Bae, K. (2001). The changing determinants of state expenditure in the United States: 1965-1992. Public Finance and Management, 1(4), 370–392. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (Fourth). Australia: Allen & Unwin. Patmawati, I. (2008). Pembangunan ekonomi melalui agihan zakat: Tinjauan empirikal. Jurnal Syariah, 16(2), 223–244. Plotnick, R. D., & Winters, R. F. (1985). A politico-economic theory of income redistribution. The American Political Science Review, 79(2), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956660. Portal Rasmi Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. (2017). Retrieved July 30, 2017, from https://www.dosm.gov.my/. PPZ-MAIWP. (2009). Objektif penubuhan PPZ-MAIWP. Retrieved March 4, 2010, from http://www.zakat.com.my/info-ppz/. Qardawi, Y. (1999). Fiqh Al Zakah (Volume I): A comparative study of zakah, regulations and philosophy in the light of Qur’an and Sunnah. Jeddah. Scientific Publishing Centre, King Abdulaziz University; Saudi Arabia. Ram Al Jaffri, S. (2016). Zakat dan persepsi buruk masyarakat. Utusan Online. Retrieved 9 February 2018. Ram Al Jaffri, S. (2010). Gelagat kepatuhan zakat perniagaan di negeri Kedah. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ram Al Jaffri, S., Kamil, M. I., & Zainol, B. (2009a). Peranan sikap, moral, undang-undang dan penguatkuasaan zakat terhadap gelagat kepatuhan zakat perniagaan. International Conference on Corporate Law (ICCL) 2009, (June), 1–13. Ram Al Jaffri, S., Kamil, M. I., & Zainol, B. (2009b). Peraturan pembayaran zakat kepada institusi zakat: Sikap peniaga dan kesannya terhadap gelagat pembayaran zakat perniagaan. Jurnal Syariah, 17(3), 607–630. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Revelli, F. (2007). Local media networks and social spending: Evidence from the UK. Economic Letters, 96, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.12.029. Robinson, P. (1999). The CNN effect : Can the news media drive foreign policy? Review of International Studies, 25, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599003010. Rosbi, A. R., Sanep, A., & Hairunnizam, W. (2008). Perlaksanaan bantuan modal zakat: Analisis perbandingan. In Seminar Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia 2008 (pp. 450–459). Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33, 903–938. Rozmal, M. (2005, November 24). MAINS diminta dedah agihan zakat. Berita Harian. Retrieved October12, 2009. Sacks, S., & Harris, R. (1964). The determinants of state and local government expenditures and intergovernmental flows of funds. National Tax Journal, 17(1), 75–85. Sanep, A., Hairunnizam, W., & Adnan, M. (2006). Penswastaan institusi zakat dan kesannya terhadap pembayaran secara formal di Malaysia. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 13(2), 175–196. Scott, J. T., & Bornstein, B. H. (2009). What’s fair in foul weather and fair? Distributive justice across different allocation contexts and goods. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090744. Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., Michelbach, P. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 749. https://doi.org/10.2307. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business (Fourth Ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Shaarani, I. (2010). 67 peratus syarikat layak belum bayar zakat. Berita Harian, p. 42. Retrieved June 26, 2011. Shawal, K., & Hasan, B. (2007). Amalan “corporate governance” dalam pengurusan institusi zakat di Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan JAWHAR, 1(2), 53–70. Shirazi, N. S. (2006). Providing for the resource shortfall for poverty elimination through the institution of zakat in low inccome Muslim countries. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 14(1), 1–27. Simon, A. (1997). Television news and international earthquake relief. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02718.x. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocationg scarce resources: A contigency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(6), 491–522. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes undelying liberal and conservatives policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Technology, 65(6), 1205–1223. Smith, J. R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 363–386. Smith, S., & Albaum, G. (2005). Fundamental of marketing research. Sage Publication. Stake, J. E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender and protestant ethic endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.410. Stice, E., Maxfield, J., & Wells, T. (2002). Adverse effects of social pressure to be thin on young women: An experimental investigation of the effects of "Fat Talk". https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10171. Tabachnick, B. ., & Fidell, L. . (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (Fifth Ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Tatum, B. C., Eberlin, R., Kottraba, C., & Bradberry, T. (2003). Leadership, decision making, and organizational justice. Management Decision, 41(10), 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310509535. Terjemahan Hadis Sahih Bukhary. (1989). Singapore: Darel Fajr Pubblishing House. Tetlock, P. E., & Mitchell, G. (1993). Liberal and conservative approaches to justice: Conflicting psychological poitraits. In Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 234–255). Thomas, A. S., Litschert, R. J., & Ramaswamy, K. (1991). The performance impact of strategy ‐ manager coalignment: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120704. Toikka, R., Gais, T., Nikolov, P. V., & Billen, P. (2004). Spending on social welfare programs in rich and poor states (No. 0410006). EconWPA. Townsend, P. (1987). Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400020341. Tyler, B. B., & Steensma, K. H. (1998). The effects of executives ’ experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 939–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199810)19:10<939::AID-SMJ978>3.0.CO;2-Z. United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human Development Report 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2011, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2010. Vigna, S. Della, List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2009). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1-56. Wahbah, Z. (2005). Usul al Fiqh al Islami. Damsyiq: Dar al Fikr. Weihrich, H., Kannice, M. V., & Koontz, H. (2009). Management: A global and entrepreneural perspectives. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill. White, H., & McGillivray, M. (1995). How well is aid allocated? Descriptive measures of aid allocation: A survey of methodology and results. Development and Change, 26(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00547.x. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/138.232.236.8. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. (P. P. Hall, Ed.) (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River. Zahri, H. (2009). Business zakat accounting and taxation. In Conference on Islamic Perspectives on Management and Finance (pp. 13–18). Zainol, B. (2008). Faktor-faktor penentu niat gelagat kepatuhan zakat pendapatan gaji. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Zainol, B., Kamil, M. I., & Faridahwati, M. S. (2009). Predicting compliance intention on zakah on employment income in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 28, 85–103. Zulkefly, A. K., Mohd. Azlan Shah, Z., & Hairunnizam, W. (2006). Pendapatan dan sasaran perbelanjaan dana zakat di negeri Kedah, Perak, Selangor dan Negeri Sembilan: Isu dan cabaran. Zakat: Pensyariatan, Perekonomian Dan Perundangan, 130–148. Zulkifli, M. (2010). Enggan bayar zakat, denda RM1,000. Kosmo, p. 4. Retrieved August 18, 2011.

Faktor-faktor penentu keutamaan agihan zakat kepada asnaf oleh institusi zakat di Malaysia

Similar Items