Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.

The objective of this research is to better understand the relationship between leadership style and job satisfaction among personnel of the Malaysian Army. A survey was conducted in the field using a structured questionnaire based on Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Weiss, Dawi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd Halim, Khalid
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng
Published:	2006
Subjects:	HD61 Risk Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/79/1/mohd_halim.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.79
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng
topic	HD61 Risk Management
spellingShingle	HD61 Risk Management Mohd Halim, Khalid Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
description	The objective of this research is to better understand the relationship between leadership style and job satisfaction among personnel of the Malaysian Army. A survey was conducted in the field using a structured questionnaire based on Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Weiss, Dawis, England and Lofquist (1967) and Leadership Style Questionnaire developed by House dan Dessler (1974). The focus of the study is to examine the section commander leadership and job satisfaction of followers in the First Battalion of Royal Malay Regiment and the Ten Battalion of Royal Malay Regiment. Two hundreds eighteen personnel from both battalions were involved in the survey. Descriptive and inferential techniques was used including frequency test, T-Test, Pearson Correlation-r and Multiple Linear Regression to test the research hypothesis. The findings shows that the perception of leadership style and the level of job satisfaction in both battalions are at an average and satisfied level. In addition, the study also found that there is a significant difference in both leadership style and job satisfaction among operation and ceremonial personnel. The research also found, correlation exist between leadership style and job satisfaction. A multiple regressions analysis show that there is a relationships between variable and there is difference between battalion in predicting job satisfaction. The findings of the research suggest that the army should strengthen their personnel's with leadership knowledge, skill and attitude. Priority should be given to establish awareness among personnel's the important of accomodating leadership style in difference situations. Finally the study proposed special attention to be given on matters like pay, policy, motivation culture, intergrity and skill to make decision for leader in order to improve job satisfaction.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mohd Halim, Khalid
author_facet	Mohd Halim, Khalid
author_sort	Mohd Halim, Khalid
title	Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
title_short	Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
title_full	Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
title_fullStr	Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
title_full_unstemmed	Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.
title_sort	hubungan diantara gaya kepimpinan dan kepuasan kerja:: suatu kajian perbandingan antara anggota dalam tugas operasi dan istiadat tentera darat malaysia.
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2006
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/79/1/mohd_halim.pdf
_version_	1747826838273523712
spelling	my-uum-etd.792013-07-24T12:05:31Z Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia. 2006-11 Mohd Halim, Khalid College of Business (COB) Faculty of Business Management HD61 Risk Management The objective of this research is to better understand the relationship between leadership style and job satisfaction among personnel of the Malaysian Army. A survey was conducted in the field using a structured questionnaire based on Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Weiss, Dawis, England and Lofquist (1967) and Leadership Style Questionnaire developed by House dan Dessler (1974). The focus of the study is to examine the section commander leadership and job satisfaction of followers in the First Battalion of Royal Malay Regiment and the Ten Battalion of Royal Malay Regiment. Two hundreds eighteen personnel from both battalions were involved in the survey. Descriptive and inferential techniques was used including frequency test, T-Test, Pearson Correlation-r and Multiple Linear Regression to test the research hypothesis. The findings shows that the perception of leadership style and the level of job satisfaction in both battalions are at an average and satisfied level. In addition, the study also found that there is a significant difference in both leadership style and job satisfaction among operation and ceremonial personnel. The research also found, correlation exist between leadership style and job satisfaction. A multiple regressions analysis show that there is a relationships between variable and there is difference between battalion in predicting job satisfaction. The findings of the research suggest that the army should strengthen their personnel's with leadership knowledge, skill and attitude. Priority should be given to establish awareness among personnel's the important of accomodating leadership style in difference situations. Finally the study proposed special attention to be given on matters like pay, policy, motivation culture, intergrity and skill to make decision for leader in order to improve job satisfaction. 2006-11 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/79/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/79/1/mohd_halim.pdf application/pdf eng validuser masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abd Rahman Wok. (2002). Pencegahan jenayah dalam Angkatan Tentera Malaysia sebagai suatu cabaran. Sorotan Darat, 49. Abdul Rahman Aziz. (2000). Pekerjaan dalam kehidupan manusia. Prentice Hall. Anggota tentera terbunuh dan cedera dalam pergaduhan. (23 Jun 2003). Utusan Malaysia Anggota tentera miliki dadah 2.82 kg ditahan. (11 Okt 2004). Utusan Malaysia. Aminuddin Mohd Yusof.(1994). Kepimpinan motivasi dan prestasi: Model guru dan tentera. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Andek Masnah Andek Kelawa.(2000). Kepimpinan wanita dalam islam: kedudukannya dalam sejarah. Percetakan Watan Sdn.Bhd Aspegren, R.E. (1963). A study of leadership behaviour and its effects on morale and attitudes in selected elementary schools. Dissertation Absir, 23,3708. Carsten, J.M., dan Spector, P.E. (1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction and employment turnover: A meta analytic test of the Muchinsky model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 374-381. Barnard, C, I. (1938). The function of the executive. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Bass, B.M. (1981). Stogdill's handbook of leadership. New York: The Free Press. Bass, B.M. (1990). Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: the Free Press. Bartolo, K., dan Furlonger, B; (2000). Leadership and job satisfaction among aviation fire fighters in Australia. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 15 No, 1, 87-97. Benjamin Mahmud, (2006). The Malaysia Army: Adapting to new concept and technologies. Asian Defence Journal, March, 10-15. Berlew, D.E., dan Heller, D. (1990). Style flexibility: Tools and sucessful leaders. Legal Economics 9 (6), 34-37. Baterman, T.S., dan Organ, D.W (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26,567-595. Berkowitz, L. (1953). Sharing leadership in small, decision making groups. J. abnorm. sos. Psychology, 48, 231-238. Cranny, C.J., Smith, P.C., dan Stone, E.F. (1992). Job satisfaction. Lexington Books. Chen, J.C., dan Silverstone, C. (2005). Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal 26, No. 4, 280-288. Dandrigde, M. M. (1993). Small unit leadership: A commonsense approach. Preside Press. Darwish, A.Y.(1999). Organizational commitment: A mediator of the relationship of leadership behaviour with job satisfaction and performance in a non western country. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol 15, No 1, 6-28. Davis, K. (1957). Human relations in business. Mc Graw Hill Book Company, Inc. Dua anggota tentera ditahan kerana merogol. (3 Sep 2005). Utusan Malaysia. Edwin, P. H. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. The Free Press. Fadzuri bin Masudoki (2005). Hubungan kepuasan dan komitmen dengan hasrat untuk kekal dalam kerja dikalangan anggota pasukan paracut dan pasukan batalion infantri standard. Thesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contigency model of leadership. Dalam Berkowitz, L (Ed), Advances in experimental sosial psychology, Jil 1, 149-190. New York, Academic Press. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York, Mc Graw Hill. Fiedler, F. E. (1972). Personality, motivational systems and behaviour of high and low LPC persons. Human Relation, 25,391-412. Fiedler, F. E. (1986). The contribution of cognitive resources and leader behaviour to organizational performance. Journal of Applied Sosial Psychology. 16(6): 532-548. Fiedler, F. E., dan Garcia, J.E. (1987). New approaches to efective leadership. New York, JohnWiley & Sons. Gordon. W. J. (1961). Synctics. New York: Collier Books. Haron Din. (1988). Manusia dun Islam. Percetakan Watan Sdn. Bhd. Halpin, A.W. (1954). The leadership behaviour and combat performance of airplane commanders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Abnormal Social Psychology, vol49, 19-22. Hanisch, D.A., dan Hulin, C.L. (1990). Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An examination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Vacational Behaviour, 37, 60-78. House, R. J., dan Mitchell, T.R. (1974). Path goal theory of leadership. Contemporary Business, 3. 89-98. House, R. J. (1995). Path goal theory of leadership, lesson, legacy and transfomational theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352. Hodge, J.W. (1976). The relationship between styles of supervision and need satisfaction of two level of management employees. Dissertation Abtracts International, 37, 187. Hollander, E.P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A pratical guide to effective relationships. New York; The Free Press. Hom, P.W., dan Hulin, C.L. (1981). A competitive test of predictions of reenlistment by several model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 23-39. Heler, T. dan Van Til, J., (1983). Leadership and followership: Some summary propositions. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciene 18. 405-414. Hulin, C.L, Roznowski, M., dan Hachiya, D. (1985). Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions. Emphirical and theoretical discrepancies and an intergration. Psyshological Bulletin, 97, 233-250. Goldhaber, G.M. (1992). Komunikasi dalam organisasi: Terjemahan Omardin Hj Asshari dan Azahar Raswan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Gruenberg, J. (1980). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 606-613. Jabatanarah Infantri (2003). Mempertingkatkan prestasi kepimpinan di peringkat PTT Kanan di dalam Kor Infantri. Kertas persembahan dalam Seminar Kor Infantri, Riviera Resort, Melaka. Jenning, E.E. (1960). An anatomy of leadership. New York, Mc Graw Hill. Jogo, A.G. (1982). Leadership: Perspective in theory and research. Management Science, 28, 315-336. Kala, H. B. (2003). Military leadership. New Delhi: Manas Publications Kerr S. dan Jermier J.M. (1978). Subtitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 22,375-403. Khairani Abdul Hamid. (1985). Persepsi Kepimpinan: Suatu Kajian untuk mengenal pasti tingkahlaku kepimpinan dalam organisasi. Kertas Projek Sarjana Muda (kepujian) yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. KM kesal kejadian tentera mengamuk. (13 Feb 2002). Utusan Malaysia. Koontz, H., dan O'Donnell, C. (1955). Principles of management. New York: McGraw Hill. Knoop, R. (1987). Causes of job disactifaction among teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian society of studies in education,. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Krejcie, R., dan Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30,607-610. Luthans, F. (1989). Organizational Behaviou (5th ed.). San Fransisco: Mc Graw Hill. Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and cause of job satisfaction. In MV Donnote ed. Handbook industrial organisation pschology. Chicago: Ronal Mc Nelly. Lok, P., dan Crowford, J. (2004), The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: a cross national comparison. Journal of Management Development, 23 No. 24,321-338. Lawler, E.E., dan Porter, M. (1967). The effect of performance on job satisfaction. Industrial Relation, 7,201-228. Ma'mur Daud. (1995). Terjemahan hadis shahih Muslim: Jilid 1. Klang Book Store. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row. McCurdy, H.G., dan Lambert, W.E. (1952). The efficiency of small human groups in solution of problems requiring genuine cooperation. Journal. Pers, 20,278-494. Mc Gregor, D. (1966). Leadership and motivation. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press. Mobley,W. H., Homer, S.O., dan Hollingsworth, A.T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408-414. Nahavendi, A. (1997). The art and science of leadership. Prentice Hall. Page, R.H., dan McGinnies, E. (1959). Comparison of two styles leadership in a small group discussion. Journal appl, Psychology, 43, 240-245. Patchen, M.(1962). Supervisory methods and groups performance norms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 275-294. Perutusan Panglima Angkatan Tertera Malaysia sempena Hari ATM ke 67 pada 16 Sep 2000. PM umum lima lagi strategi tingkat perkhidmatan awam. (10 Jan 2004). Berita Harian. PTBM sifatkan disiplin anggota tentera rendah berbanding 90 an. (13 Feb 2002). Utusan Malaysia. Politis, J.D. (2006). Self leadership behavioural-focused strategies and team performance: the mediating influence of job satisfaction. Leadership and Organisation Development, 27, No 3, 203-216. Robert, J. H. (1974). Path goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Bussiness, Autumn, 81-97. Riketta, M. (2002). Attiudinal organisation commitment and job performance: A metaanalysis. Journal of Organisation Behaviour, 23, 257-266. Ribelin, P.J. (2003). Retention reflects leadership style. Nursing Management 34(8), 18-20. Schlesinger, L., Jackson, J.M., dan Butman, J. (1960). Leader-member interaction in management committees. J. abnorm. soc. Psycho, 61,360-364. Scott, K.D., dan Taylor, G.S. (1985). An examination of conflicting finding on the relationship between job satisfaction and absenteeism: A meta analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 599-612. Schmitt, N., dan McCune, J.T. (1981). The relationship between job attitudes and decision to retire. Academy of Mangement Journal ,24(4), 795-802. Smetana, R.W. (1974). The relationship between managerial behavioural and surbordinate altitude and motivation.: A contribution a behavioural theory of leadership. Unpublished dotoral dissertation, Wayne University. Smith, P.C., Kendall, l.M., dan Hulin, C.L., (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work retirement. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally. Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25,35-1. Szilagyi, A.D., dan Simms, H.P. (1974). An explotation of the path goal theory of leadership in a health care environment. Academy of Management Journal (In Press). Spector, P., dan Suttell, B.J. (1956). Research on the specific leader behaviour patterns most effective in influencing group peformance. Washington DC: American Institute for Research Tomokovic, T. (1962). Levels of knowledge of requirements as a motivation a motivation factor in work situation. Human Relations, 15, 197-216. Quinn, et.al. Dalam Hobbs, D. A., dan Blank, S.J. (1985). Sosiology and the human experiences (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Yulk, G. (1989). Leadership in organisation (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. Yulk, G. (2002). Leadership in organisation (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. Uma Sekaran. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Son, Inc, Urwick L. F. (1952). Notes on the theory of organisation. New York. American Management Association. Urwick, L. F. (1977). Leadership in 20th century . Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Limited. Wan Mohd Mahyuddin.(1996). Kepimpinan: Sorotan pelbaaagaai aspek bagi meningkatkan kualiti dan pencapaian. Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd. Wall, T.D., Kemp, N.J., Jackson, P.R., dan Clegg, C.W. (1996). Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A long term experiment. Academy of Management Journal, Vol 99, No 2, 290-304. Wilkinson, A.D., dan Wagner, R.M. (1993). Supervisory leadership style and state vocationl rehabilitation counsellor job satisfaction and productivity. Rehabilitation Counseling Buletin, 37(1), 15-24. Vroom, V.H.(1964), Work and motivation. Wiley, NewYork, NY.

Hubungan DiAntara Gaya Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja:: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Anggota Dalam Tugas Operasi dan Istiadat Tentera Darat Malaysia.

Similar Items