Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah

This case study has been implemented in three secondary schools in the district of Tumpat, Kelantan. The objective of this descriptive study is determine whether there is a correlation between the style of leadership of the principal and the disciplinary performance of the student as has been observ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ab. Rahman, Jusoh
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/1/Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/2/1.Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.805
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Ab. Rahman, Jusoh
Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
description This case study has been implemented in three secondary schools in the district of Tumpat, Kelantan. The objective of this descriptive study is determine whether there is a correlation between the style of leadership of the principal and the disciplinary performance of the student as has been observed by the teachers concerned. The study is also to determine whether the disciplinary performance of the student has been influenced by other factors such as school and environment, school rules and regulations, development, the atmosphere of the school and the level of socio-economy of the parents. The data of the study is obtained through questionnaires from the teachers, interviews with the principal, the observations of the school atmosphere and the disciplinary records of the student. The result of the study, generally shows that the aspect of management, administration and leadership which are being practised by every principal has a close relationship to the disciplinary performance of the student. The style of leadership with is being practised will determine the success of the principal’s career. The autocratic principal always looks for efficiency in management whithout considering humanities aspect. A democratic principal also looks for efficiency in his work, but more commited towards his staff. The principal who thinks more on freedom aspect (Laissez-faire) only produces a minimum production of work just to keep his members of organization. The principal should use his own discrections to combine the style of democratic leadership and autocratic leadership based on the current situation. The result of the study shows that the disciplinary performance of the student are better if the principal practises the style of autocratic and democratic leadership according to suitable atmosphere and with the right implimentation.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ab. Rahman, Jusoh
author_facet Ab. Rahman, Jusoh
author_sort Ab. Rahman, Jusoh
title Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
title_short Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
title_full Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
title_fullStr Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
title_full_unstemmed Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah
title_sort kaitan kepimpinan dan kepengurusan pengetua pada prestasi disiplin di sekolah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 1997
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/1/Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/2/1.Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf
_version_ 1747827000076140544
spelling my-uum-etd.8052013-07-24T12:09:04Z Kaitan Kepimpinan Dan Kepengurusan Pengetua Pada Prestasi Disiplin Di Sekolah 1997 Ab. Rahman, Jusoh Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This case study has been implemented in three secondary schools in the district of Tumpat, Kelantan. The objective of this descriptive study is determine whether there is a correlation between the style of leadership of the principal and the disciplinary performance of the student as has been observed by the teachers concerned. The study is also to determine whether the disciplinary performance of the student has been influenced by other factors such as school and environment, school rules and regulations, development, the atmosphere of the school and the level of socio-economy of the parents. The data of the study is obtained through questionnaires from the teachers, interviews with the principal, the observations of the school atmosphere and the disciplinary records of the student. The result of the study, generally shows that the aspect of management, administration and leadership which are being practised by every principal has a close relationship to the disciplinary performance of the student. The style of leadership with is being practised will determine the success of the principal’s career. The autocratic principal always looks for efficiency in management whithout considering humanities aspect. A democratic principal also looks for efficiency in his work, but more commited towards his staff. The principal who thinks more on freedom aspect (Laissez-faire) only produces a minimum production of work just to keep his members of organization. The principal should use his own discrections to combine the style of democratic leadership and autocratic leadership based on the current situation. The result of the study shows that the disciplinary performance of the student are better if the principal practises the style of autocratic and democratic leadership according to suitable atmosphere and with the right implimentation. 1997 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/1/Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/805/2/1.Ab_Rahman_Jusoh.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Karim b. Mohd. Nor (1989). Characteristics of Effective Rural Secondary Schools in Malaysia. Michigan : A Bell and Howell Company. Abdul Rahim b. Ahmad dun Shahrul Bariah bt. Mohd. Zain (1990). Pengurusan : Suatu sudut pandangan. Kuala Lumpur : Nurin Enterprise. Alias Muda (1981). Gaya Kepimpinan : Tingkat kepuasan pekerja-pekerja dan hubungannya, Kajian kes di Pejabat RISDA Negeri Terengganu. Bangi : Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Al-Ramaiah (1992). Kepimpinan Pendidikan : Cabaran masa kini. Petaling Jaya : Eagle Trading. Aminudin Mohd. Yusof (1990). Kepimpinan : Siri analisis psikologi. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dun Pustaka. Ary, P., Jacobs, L. and Razarieh (1985). Introduction to Research in Education, 3rd. Ed. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Blake, R.R. and Muton, J.S. (1978). The Managerial Grid. Dallas : Gulf Publications. Boyson, R. (1973). Disciplines in School. London : Ward Lock Educational. Brookover, W. et.al. (1979). School Social Systems and Student Achievement. New York : Praegar. Campbell, R.F., Bridges, E.M. and Nystrand, R.O. (1977). Introduction to Educational Administration. Boston : Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Dessler, G. (1977). Management Fundamentalist. New York : Reston Publishing Co. Docking, J.W. (1987). Control and Discipline in Schools : Perspectives and approaches. London : Harper and Row Publishers. Ewing, D. (1964). Long Range Planning for Management. New York : Harper and Row. Fiedler, F.E. (1976). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York : McGraw-Hill, Inc. Fulmer, R.M. (1983). Practicle Human Relation. Illinois : Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Goldhaber, G.M. (1991). Communication in Organization. 3rd. Ed. Iowa: Wm.C. Brown Company Publishers. Gordon, J.R. (1987). A Diagnostic Approach to Organization Behavior. Boston : Allynard Bacon, Inc. Gragey, W. (1970). The Psychology of Disciplines. London : University of London. Griffin, R.W. (1990). Management. 3rd. Ed. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1985). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers. Handoko, T.H. (1984). Management. Yogyakarta : Percetakan BPFE. Herbert, T.T. (1981). Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. 2nd. Ed. London : Collier MacMilan Publishers. Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K.H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior Utilizing Human Resourses. 3rd. Ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall. Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (1982). Educational Administration : Theory Research and Practice. New York : Random House, Inc. Hussein Mohamed (1986). "Masalah Disiplin dan Cara-cara Penyelesaiannya". Jurnal PKPSM 1985 - 86 : Persidangan Kebangsaan Pengetua-pengetua Sekolah Menengah Malaysia. lbrahim Mamat (1993). Kepimpinan Sekolah : Teori dan Praktis. Kuala Lumpur : Kumpulan Budiman Sdn.Bhd. Ibrahim Saud (1986). Isu Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Jaafar Muhamad (1995). Asas Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur : Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Kahn, R. And Katz, D. (1960). Leadership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale, Group Dynamics : Research and Theory. 2nd. ed. New York : Row Peterson. Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundation of Behavioral Research. 2nd. ed. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Koontz, H. and O’Donnel, C. (1976). Management : A System and Contigency Analysis of Management Functions. 6th. ed. Hamburg : Mc Graw Hill Book Co. Kothari, C.R. (1985). Research Methodology : Methods and Techniques. New Delhi : Wiley Eastern Limited. Kounin (1970). Discipline and Group Management in Classrooms. New York : Holt Rinehart and Winston. Lewis, R. (1991). The Discipline Dilemma. Victoria, Australia : The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan (1990). Buku Rekod Salahlaku/Masalah Disiplin. Kuala Lumpur : Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan (1979). Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Pelaksanaan Dasar Pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan (1987). Laporan Mengenai Kedudukan Disiplin Murid. Kuala Lumpur : Jawatankuasa Penasihat Disiplin Sekolah, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan (1981). Panduan Am Disiplin Sekolah-sekolah. Kuala Lumpur : Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan (1988). Panduan Tatacara Disiplin Sekolah Untuk Guru Besar dan Guru. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. MAMPU (1990b). Panduan Produktiviti. Kuala Lumpur : Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Marimutu, T. (1980). Pengenalan Sosiologi Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya : Penerbitan Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Mohd. Jaafar Abdul Karim (1988). Pengurusan Sekolah. Petaling Jaya : Maju Enterprise. Mohd. Majid Konting (1994). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mok Soon Sang (1995). Asas Pendidikan 3 : Penilaian Dalam Proses Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Mok Soon Sang dun Lee Shok Mee (1990). Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur : Kumpulan Budiman. Morphet, E.L., et. al. (1974). Educational Organization and Administration Concept. Englewood : Prentice-Hall. Murad Mohd. Nor (1981). "Disiplin di Sekolah - Masalah dan Penyelesaiannya", Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Masyarakat, Februari 1981. Mustaffa Kamil Ayub (1991). Generasi Pelajar Pembina Tamadun Abad 21. Petaling Jaya : Persatuan Kebangsaan Pelajar Islam Malaysia (PKPIM) dun Budaya Ilmu Sdn. Bhd. Newell, C.A. (1978). Human Behavior in Educational Administration. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc. Nickson, R.W. (1990). Bagaimana Menjadi Pengurus Yang Berjaya. Terjemahan oleh Che An Abd.Ghani. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping Track : How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven : Yale University Press. OFSTED (1993). Achieving Good Behavior in Schools : A Report from The HM Chief Inspector of Schools. London : Open Books. Omardin Ashaari (1996). Pengurusan Sekolah: Suatu Panduan Lengkap. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Rabiah Sidin (1988). Asas Pentadbiran Pendidikan. Sungai Buluh : Pustaka Cipta Sdn. Bhd. Rasberry, R.W. and Lindsay, L.L. (1993). Effective Managerial Communication. 2nd. ed. California : Wadsworth Publishing Co. Razali Mat Zin (1991). Kepimpinan Dalam Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publication and Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Rebore, R.M. (1982). Personnal Administration in Education : A Management Approach. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc. Reitz, J.H. and Jewell, L.N. (1985). Managing. London : Scott, Foreman and Company. Robbins, S.P. (1996). Organizational Behavior : Concepts, Controversies and Applications. 7th. ed. New Jersey : Prentice Hall International, Inc. Rohaty Mohd. Majzub (1991). Disiplin Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Samarudin Rejab dun Nazri Abdullah (1982). Panduan Menulis Tesis. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dun Pustaka. Savage, T.V. (1991). Discipline for Self-control. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc. Sharifah Alwiyah Alsagoff (1980). Sosiologi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Heinemann Educational Books Ltd. Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: The Free Press. Stoner, J.A.F. and Winkel, C. (1985). Management. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc. Tanner, L.N. (1978). Classroom Discipline. New York : Holt-Rinehart and Winston. Van Dalen, D.B. (1979). Understanding Educational Research : An Introduction. 4th. ed. New York : McGraw-Hill Book Company. Vroom, V.H. (1976). "Leadership" in Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago : Rand MC Nally. Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd Noordin (1993). Wawasan Pendidikan : Agenda Pengisian. Kuala Lumpur : Nurin Enterprise. Wilayah Persekutuan, Jabatan Pendidikan (1984). Buku Panduan Pentadbiran Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dun Pustaka. Wiles, J. and Bondi, J. (1983). Principles of School Administration : The Real World of Leadership in Schools. Columbus, Ohio : Bell and Howel Company. Yap, T.H. dan James, F. (1990). Guru Besar dan Pentadbiran Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur : Pustaka Pelangi. Zaidatul Akmaliah Lope Pihie (1989). Pentadbiran Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Fajar Bakti.