Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua

Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan menentukan kesahan serta kebolehgunaan</p><p>kit pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP), PaTraKit bagi topik Transformasi Isometri</p><p>Tingkatan Dua. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah kajian Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norashidah A Wahab
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2023
Subjects:
QA75 Electronic computers
Computer science
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10247
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:10247
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic QA75 Electronic computers
Computer science
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers
Computer science
Norashidah A Wahab
Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan menentukan kesahan serta kebolehgunaan</p><p>kit pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP), PaTraKit bagi topik Transformasi Isometri</p><p>Tingkatan Dua. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah kajian Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan.</p><p>Kajian ini merupakan kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan jenis pertama yang</p><p>menggunakan model ADDIE. Proses kesahan PaTraKit yang dibangunkan telah</p><p>dilaksanakan oleh lima orang pakar iaitu seorang pensyarah Matematik di sebuah</p><p>universiti awam, seorang pensyarah Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG) dan tiga orang guru</p><p>Matematik sekolah menengah yang mempunyai pengalaman lebih dari lima tahun</p><p>untuk menilai kit tersebut. Seterusnya, dengan menggunakan persampelan kesenangan,</p><p>seramai 30 orang murid dari sebuah sekolah Maahad Tahfiz di Mersing telah dipilih</p><p>sebagai sampel kajian bagi menentukan kebolehgunaan kit dengan melengkapkan soal</p><p>selidik kebolehgunaan PaTraKit. Maklum balas daripada pakar telah dianalisis dengan</p><p>menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI) manakala kebolehgunaan kit telah</p><p>ditentukan melalui nilai skor min. Hasil analisis menunjukkan PaTraKit mempunyai</p><p>kesahan yang baik dengan nilai CVI=1.00. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahawa kit</p><p>yang dibangunkan ini mempunyai tahap kebolehgunaan yang tinggi dengan skor min</p><p>4.89. Sebagai kesimpulan, PaTraKit yang dibangunkan boleh digunakan sebagai Bahan</p><p>Bantu Mengajarar (BBM) dalam PdP topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua.</p><p>Implikasinya, guru-guru boleh menjadikan PaTraKit sebagai BBM alternatif untuk</p><p>mengajar topik Transformasi Isometri di samping dapat membantu murid mempelajari</p><p>dan memahami topik tersebut dengan lebih mudah.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Norashidah A Wahab
author_facet Norashidah A Wahab
author_sort Norashidah A Wahab
title Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
title_short Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
title_full Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
title_fullStr Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua
title_sort pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan patrakit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik transformasi isometri tingkatan dua
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2023
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10247
_version_ 1804890537944154112
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:102472024-05-24 Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan PaTraKit berasaskan pembelajaran koperatif bagi topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua 2023 Norashidah A Wahab QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan menentukan kesahan serta kebolehgunaan</p><p>kit pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP), PaTraKit bagi topik Transformasi Isometri</p><p>Tingkatan Dua. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah kajian Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan.</p><p>Kajian ini merupakan kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan jenis pertama yang</p><p>menggunakan model ADDIE. Proses kesahan PaTraKit yang dibangunkan telah</p><p>dilaksanakan oleh lima orang pakar iaitu seorang pensyarah Matematik di sebuah</p><p>universiti awam, seorang pensyarah Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG) dan tiga orang guru</p><p>Matematik sekolah menengah yang mempunyai pengalaman lebih dari lima tahun</p><p>untuk menilai kit tersebut. Seterusnya, dengan menggunakan persampelan kesenangan,</p><p>seramai 30 orang murid dari sebuah sekolah Maahad Tahfiz di Mersing telah dipilih</p><p>sebagai sampel kajian bagi menentukan kebolehgunaan kit dengan melengkapkan soal</p><p>selidik kebolehgunaan PaTraKit. Maklum balas daripada pakar telah dianalisis dengan</p><p>menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI) manakala kebolehgunaan kit telah</p><p>ditentukan melalui nilai skor min. Hasil analisis menunjukkan PaTraKit mempunyai</p><p>kesahan yang baik dengan nilai CVI=1.00. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahawa kit</p><p>yang dibangunkan ini mempunyai tahap kebolehgunaan yang tinggi dengan skor min</p><p>4.89. Sebagai kesimpulan, PaTraKit yang dibangunkan boleh digunakan sebagai Bahan</p><p>Bantu Mengajarar (BBM) dalam PdP topik Transformasi Isometri Tingkatan Dua.</p><p>Implikasinya, guru-guru boleh menjadikan PaTraKit sebagai BBM alternatif untuk</p><p>mengajar topik Transformasi Isometri di samping dapat membantu murid mempelajari</p><p>dan memahami topik tersebut dengan lebih mudah.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10247 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10247 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdul Rahim, H., & Hayazi, M. Y. (2010). Penggunaan alat bantu mengajar (abm) di kalangan guru-guru teknikal di sekolah menengah teknik daerah Johor Bahru, Johor, 1-8. Diperoleh daripada https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/11786239.pdf</p><p>Abdu-Raheem, B. O. (2011). Availability, adequacy, and utilization of social studies instructional materials in Ekiti State secondary schools. Journal of Current Discourse and Research, 3, 242-255.</p><p>Acharya, B. J. (2017). Factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics by mathematics learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8 15.</p><p>Ahmad Fakhrudin Mohamed Yusoff & Ammar Badruddin Romli. (2018). Kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah alih (mobile apps)bagi kursusSains, teknologi dan kejuruteraan dalam Islam (m-istech) di Politeknik Malaysia. Malaysian Online Jurnal of Education, 2(1), 18-28.</p><p>Akpan, V. I., & Okoli, A. C. (2017). Effect of the Use of Instructional Materials on Academic Performance of Pupils in Ikwuano Abia State. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(1), 247-250.</p><p>Aktas, G. S., & nl, M. (2017). Understanding of eight grade students about transformation geometry: Perspectives on students mistakes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 103-119.</p><p>Almomen, R. K., Kaufman, D., Alotaibi, H.,Al-Rowais, N.A., Albeik, M.,& Albattal,</p><p>S. M. (2016). Applying the ADDIEanalysis, design, development, implementation and evaluationinstructional design model to continuing professional development for primary care physicians in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 538-546.</p><p>Alshatri, S. H., Wakil, K., Jamal, K., & Bakhtyar, R. (2019). Teaching aids effectiveness in learning Mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 448-453.</p><p>Aydin, M., Baki, A., Yildiz, C., & Kgce, D. (2010). Mathematics teacher educators beliefs about teacher role. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5468-5473.</p><p>Aydisheh, F. H., & Gharibi, H. (2015). Effectiveness of constructivistteaching method on students mathematic academic achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 572-579.</p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Peter Voo, Ismail Maakip & Mohd Dahlan A. Malek. (2017). Kaedah penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Bajracharya, J. R. (2019). Instructional design and models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research, 9(2), 1-9.</p><p>Berk, L. (2013). Development through the lifespan (6th ed.). Pearson.</p><p>Berliner (2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24, 200-212.</p><p>Berta, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2020). Cooperative learning methods in mathematics education1. 5 year experience from teachers perspective. In Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, 52, 269-279.</p><p>Bhowmik, M. (2015). Constructivism approach in mathematics teaching and assessment of mathematical understanding. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and Review, 4(1), 08-12.</p><p>Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1-6. Bouck, E. C., &Flanagan, S. M. (2010). Virtual manipulatives: What they areand how teachers can use them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(3), 186-191.</p><p>Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media.</p><p>Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2016). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.</p><p>Carbonneau, K. J., & Marley, S. C. (2012). Activity-based learning strategies and academic achievement. Dalam J. A. C. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.</p><p>CheGhani CheKob, Arman Shah Abdullah, Noor AidaAslinda Norizan & Halimaton Shamsuddin. (2019). Effects of learning aid (kit) on student performance for electriccircuits topics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 320330.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd Edition). SAGE.</p><p>Creswell, J.W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.</p><p>DAngelo, T., Bunch, J. C., & Thoron, A. (2018). Instructional design using the dick and carey systems approach. Diperoleh daripada</p><p>file:///C:/Users/ThinkPad/Downloads/105379-Article%20Text-179373-1-10</p><p>20200218%20(1).pdf</p><p>Darlis, N., Farida, F., & Miaz, Y. (2021). Pengembangan desain pembelajaran model assure berbasis problem-based learning menggunakan komik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 334-342.</p><p>Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts.</p><p>Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194197.</p><p>Davis, A. L. (2013). Using instructional design principles to develop effective information literacy instruction: The ADDIE model. College & Research Libraries News, 74(4), 205-207.</p><p>Durak, G., & Ataizi, M. (2016). TheABC's of onlinecoursedesign according to Addie Model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2084-2091.</p><p>Eka Irawati & Ali Mustadi. (2019). Learning together assisted with of 7-in-1 box: Creating effectiveness of mathematic learning outcomes of elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 310-319.</p><p>Ellyza Kasim & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan ujian kemahiran proses sains untuk murid sekolah rendah berdasarkan model pengukuran rasch (validity and reliability of science process skills test for primary school pupils based on rasch measurement model). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia Malaysian Journal of Education, 43(3), 1-9.</p><p>Endang Istikomah & Nor Sakinah Mohamad. (2013). Kesan penggunaan perisian Geometers Sketchpad ke atas kefahaman konsep Matematik murid. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 1(2), 1-13.</p><p>Evbuomwan, D. (2013). An investigation into the difficulties faced by Form C students in the learning of Transformation Geometry in Lesotho secondary schools. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan]. University of South Africa, Africa.</p><p>Faezah Abd.Ghani & Mazlan Aris. (2012). Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Kemahiran Mengawal Stress Kehidupan Guru. Sains Humanika, 58(1).</p><p>Faizah Jaapar. (2017). Bahan bantu mengajar (BBM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (p&p) di sekolah menengah kebangsaan daerah Pontian. [Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Tun Hussien Onn, Johor.</p><p>Farihah Hussain, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff, Maimun Aqsha Lubis Abdin Lubis & Mohammad Zamri Jusoh. (2020). Amalan bahan bantu pengajaran guru dalam pengajaran Nahu Kurikulum Bersepadu Dini Sekolah Agama. Jurnal'Ulwan, 5(1), 134-145.</p><p>Fatihah Anis Saifuddin & TeeTzeKiong. (2018). Keberkesanan kitsimulasi pautan ke atas pencapaian topik Pautan Reka Bentuk Mekanikal dalam kalangan murid Tingkatan Dua. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 12(1), 89-97.</p><p>Fathurrohman. (2015). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Ar-Ruzz Media.</p><p>Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(3), 379-383.</p><p>Febrian& Sukma Adi Perdana. (2017). Memfasilitasi penalaran geometri transformasi siswa melalui eksplorasi motif melayu dengan bantuan grid. Jurnal Gantang, 2(2), 157-163.</p><p>Febrian & Sukma Adi Perdana. (2018). Triggeringfourth graders informal knowledge of isometric transformation geometry through the exploration of Malay cloth motif. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 26-36.</p><p>Febrian & Puji Astuti. (2018). The RME Principles on Geometry Learning with Focus of Transformation Reasoning through Exploration on Malay Woven Motif. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 33-41.</p><p>Fernando, S. Y., & Marikar, F. M. (2017). Constructivist teaching/learning theory and participatory teaching methods.Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110122.</p><p>FitaAyu Apriyasha, Taufik Hidayat & Nareswari Anita. (2019). Pengembangan media kit pembelajaran untuk siswa kelas iii sekolah dasar terhadap materi pecahan sederhana. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 163-172.</p><p>Foo Jing Yao. (2017). Pembinaan Modul I-Think Ungkapan Algebra Tingkatan Dua. [Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.</p><p>Freire, A. F, Rodrigues, F. S, Aquino, M. R. S, Soares, M. V, Gois, D. D. P & Viana,</p><p>J. D. (2018). The use of the geoboard in teaching Geometry: calculating area and perimeter. Multidiciplinary Core Scientific Journal of Knowledge, 6(3), 119-135.</p><p>Furner, J. M., & Marinas, C. A. (2011). Geoboards to Geogebra: Moving from the concrete to the abstract in geometry. International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematic, 23, 112-116.</p><p>Gillies, R. (2014). Cooperative learning: developments in research. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 125-140.</p><p>Ghazali Darussalam & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Githua, B. N., & Mwangi, S. W. (2013). Effects of Using Loci-Kitmodels on secondary schools students' achievement in the mathematics topic Lociin Kibwezi District, Kenya'. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(2), 100-112.</p><p>Golafshani, N. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and teaching Mathematics with manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 137-159.</p><p>Gresia Dolhasair, Siti Istiyati & Karsono. (2017). Penggunaan media geoboard (papan berpaku) untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep bangun datar pada siswa kelas ii sekolah dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 5(3).</p><p>Grbz, R. (2010). The effect of activity-based instruction on conceptual development of seventh gradestudents in probability. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(6), 743767.</p><p>Haizum Hanim Ab. Halim & Lai Chee Sern. (2011). Penilaian keberkesanan kit pengajaran transistor bagi aliran vokasional. Seminar Pasca Ijazah Yang Pertama, 6-15.</p><p>Hambre, V. D. (2015). Development of teacher-designed selflearning kit in geometry forthe subanen, maranaos and visayans. International Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 1-14.</p><p>Heale, R. & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 18 (3), 65-68.</p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russel, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1996). Instructional media and technologies for learning (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Hobri, Dafik, & Anowar Hossain. (2018). The implementation of learning together in improving students mathematical performance. International Journal of instruction, 11(2), 483-496.</p><p>Holmes, A. B. (2013).Effects of manipulativeuseon PK-12 Mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Diperoleh daripada http://files.eric.gov/fulltext/ED563072.pdf</p><p></p><p>Hunt, A. W., Nipper, K. L., & Nash, L. E. (2011). Virtual vs. concrete manipulatives in mathematics teacher education: Is one type more effective than the other? Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 16(2), 1-6.</p><p>Hustedt, J., Epstein, D., & Barnett, W. (2013). Early childhood education programs in the public schools. Handbook of research on the education of young children. New York, NY: Routledge.</p><p>In'am, A., & Sutrisno, E. S. (2021). Strengthening students' self-efficacy and motivation in learning mathematics through the cooperative learning Model. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 395-410.</p><p>IPutu Wisna Ariawan. (2016).Pengaruh pembelajaran berbantuan teknologi komputer terhadap hasil belajar geometri transformasi dengan mengontrol keterampilan berpikir kritis. Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif. 267-275. Diperoleh daripada https://scholar.google.com.my/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0% C5&as_vis=1&q=PENGARUH+PEMBELAJARAN+BERBANTUAN+TEK NOLOGI+KOMPUTER+TERHADAP+HASIL+BELAJAR+GEOMETRI+T RANSFORMASI+DENGAN+MENGONTROL+KETERAMPILAN+BERPI KIR+KRITIS&btnG=</p><p>Ismail Kailani & Mohd Suhaidy Rohani. (2011). Kesan penggunaan Kit Pengajaran Bermodul (KPB) bagi mata pelajaran Matematik (Sudut Dongak dan Sudut Tunduk) Tingkatan 4 di dua buah sekolah menegah kebangsaan di daerah Pontian, Johor. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education. 1-10. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11917/1/Kesan_Penggunaan_Kit_Pe</p><p>ngajaran_Bermodul.pdf</p><p>Ismail Sulaiman. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengujian kebolehgunaan modul pengajaran berasaskan peta pemikiran bagi topik Nisbah, Kadar dan Kadaran. [Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.</p><p>Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.</p><p>Johnson, D, W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (2013). Cooperation in the classroom (9thed.). Interaction Book Company.</p><p>Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). Exploring the effectiveness of usingGeoGebraande-transformation in teaching and learning Mathematics. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational Technologies. 19-23. Diperoleh daripada http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2010/Tunisia/EDUTE/</p><p>EDUTE-02.pdf</p><p></p><p>Kaplan, A., & ztrk, M. (2014). Analysis of 2nd-8th grade students thinking approaches toward understand the concept of symmetry. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1502-1515.</p><p>Kaviza, M. (2020). Kesan penggunaan sumber-sumber sejarah berdasarkan model motivasi arcs terhadap peningkatan motivasi dalam kalangan murid tingkatan empat. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 5(7), 136-145.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan Dua. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p>Koparan, T. (2017). Analysis of teaching materials developed by prospective mathematics teachers and their views on material development. Malaysian Online Jurnal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 8-28.</p><p>Lafay, A., Osana, H.P., & Valat, M. (2019). Effects of interventions with manipulatives on immediate learning, maintenance, and transfer in children with Mathematics learning disabilities: A systematicreview. Education Research International, 121.</p><p>Lastrijanah, Teguh Prasetyo & Annisa Mawardini. (2017). Pengaruh media pembelajaran geoboeard terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 87-100.</p><p>Law Siao Siu, Normaliza Mat Rais & Khairunisak Suleiman. (2015). Penghasilan kit bulatan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik dan matematik tambahan peringkat sekolah menengah. Kertas Kerja Projek Inovasi, 1-22.</p><p>Laz, H. A., & Shafei, K. E. (2014). The effectiveness of constructivist learning model in the teaching of mathematics. Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 2(3), 106-109.</p><p>Leong Koon Wah. (2015). The Effects of instruction using the ARCS model and geogebraon upper secondary studentsmotivationand achievement in learning Combined Transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30, 141-158.</p><p>Lestari, F., Saryantono, B., Syazali, M., Saregar, A., Madiyo, M., Jauhariyah, D., & Umam, R. (2019). Cooperativelearning application with the method of network treeconcept map: based on japaneselearning system approach. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 15-32.</p><p>Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385.</p><p>Macefield, R. (2009). How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: a practitioner's guide. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(1), 34-45.</p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Major, T. E., & Mangope, B. (2012). The constructivist theory in Mathematics: The caseof Botswanaprimary schools. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 139-147.</p><p>Mashingaidze, S. (2012). The teaching of geometric (isometric) Transformations at secondary school level: What approach to use and why? Asian Social Science, 8(15), 197-210.</p><p>Md. Anowar Hossain & Muhammad Rezal Kamel Ariffin. (2018). Integration of structured cooperative learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 23-29.</p><p>Mohd Afifi Baharudin Setambah. (2017). Pembangunan dan pengujian modul kaedah pengajaran berasaskan adventure terhadap pencapaian Statistik Asas, kemahiran berfikir kritis dan kemahiran kepimpinan. [Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.</p><p>Mohd Ali Ibrahim & Ahmad Solhi Redwan. (2010). Pembangunan perisian pengajaran berasaskan Model Konstruktif Needham 5 Fasa bagi tajuk keelektrikan dalam matapelajaran sains sekolah rendah. Diperoleh daripada https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11786659.pdf</p><p></p><p>Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Mohd Rino Mohd Johari. (2019). Keberkesanan penggunaan i-koam dalam matematik dan impak terhadap tingkahlaku introvert murid pemulihan khas. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan, 91-99.</p><p>Mok Soon Sang. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan untuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Multimedia Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Mufarida Indah. (2018). Meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa dengan menggunakan mediageoboard materi bangun datarkelas ii sdn gebang 1. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/3067/1/162.%20INDAH%20MUFARIDA.pdf</p><p>Muhammad Hafizhuddin Abdul Rahman. (2016). Kesan penggunaan modul pengintegrasian geogebra topik trigonometri terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi bagi murid berpencapaian rendah. [Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan].Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.</p><p>Muhamad Hanafi, Kathrin Nur Wulandari & Rizki Wulansari. (2017). Transformasi Geometri Rotasi Berbantuan Software Geogebra. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 3(2), 93-102.</p><p>Muruganantham, G. (2015). Developing of E-content packageby usingADDIE model. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(3), 52-54.</p><p>Nadia Abdul Rahim, NorAqilah Meor Fadzir, NurAdilah Hani Zaimal, Firli Fairulyzan Arias Yahaya, Zatul Iffah Zainol, Mohd Razimi Husin. (2021). Implikasi gaya pembelajaran koperatif subjek sains bagi murid tahap dua di Sekolah Kebangsaan Bandar Baru Rawang. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 57-66.</p><p>Nazihatulhasanah Arbain & Nurbiha A. Shukor. (2015). The effects of GeoGebra on students achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(1), 208214.</p><p>Nissa, I. C., Febrilia, B. R. A., & Astutik, F. (2021). Perspektif Siswa Terhadap E-Learning Berdasarkan Model Motivasi ARCS. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 19-33.</p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Edisi Kedua. Mc-Graw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>NorazilawatiAbdullah,Abdul Talib Hashim, Rosnidar Mansor, NorainiMohamed Noh & Norul Haida Reduzan. (2013). Konstruktivisme: Dari kaca mata guru sains dan matematik. International Conference on Social Science Research, 4-5.</p><p>NorAzimah Abdul Ghani. (2019). Pembangunan set lengkap ASK (AlgebraStory Kit) membantu PdP dalamMatematik. Journal on Technical and Vocational Education, 4(3), 57-68.</p><p>Norfarizah Mohd Bakhir & Mohd Zazril Ikhmal Zamri. (2016). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar berasaskan papan pelbagai sentuh untuk pembelajaran Sains. 2nd International Conference on Creative Media, Design & Technology. 1-16. Diperoleh daripada http://www.reka.usm.my/images/PAPER_87.pdf</p><p>Norzainariah Abu Hassan. (2004). Kebolehgunaan kit pengajaran dan pembelajaran bagi meningkatkan prestasi murid: satu tinjauan di KUITTHO. (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan), Kolej Universiti Teknologi Tun Hussein Onn, Johor.</p><p>Novianti, C., Sadipun, B., & Balan, J. M. (2020). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika peserta didik. SPEJ (Science and Physic Education Journal), 3(2), 57-75.</p><p>Novi Kristiani & ZuhdanKun Prasetyo. (2016). Keefektifan pembelajaran metematika melalui penggunaan media benda konkret pada kelas V SD Timuran. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(2), 163-175.</p><p>Nur Alwani Azizan @ Zolkipli & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee bin Abdullah. (2021). Construction of Algebra Board as ateaching aid for subtopic Linear Equations in OneVariableForm 1. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 9(2), 4348.</p><p>Nur Bahiyah Abdul Wahab, Najib Haron & Che Lah Che Mamat. (2019). Kebolehgunaan kit RIMBA bagi Penerapan Elemen Sekolah Rimba Malaysia (eSRM) dalam kalangan Murid Orang Asli. Journal of Educational Research and Indigeneous Studies, 2 (1).</p><p>Nurhanim Saadah Abdullah, Ramlan Zainal Abidin & Suhaimi Mohamad. (2010). Kesan penggunaan kit pengajaran bersepadu magnetik-PLC (programmable logic controller) terhadap kefahaman konsep asas kawalan magnet dan PLC. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/id/eprint/3236/1/997.pdf. 371378.</p><p>Nur Syafiqah Isa & Nurul Nazirah Mohd Imam Maarof. (2018). Keberkesanan penggunaan grafik berkomputer sebagai alat bahan bantu mengajar dalam kalangan pelajar reka bentuk dan teknologi. Jurnal Sains Humanika, 10(3-3), 81-87.</p><p>Nurzaemah Ismail, Maimun Aqsha Lubis & Junaidah Mat Isa. (2015). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar dalam pengajaran Bahasa Arab. Proceeding of the 8th International Workshop and Conference of Asean Studies on Islamic and Arabic Education and Civilization. 1(4), 454-460.</p><p>Nyet Moi Siew & Mohammad Syafiq Abd Rahman (2019). Assessing the validity and reliability of the future thinking test using Rasch Measurement Model. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(4), 139-149.</p><p>Ofoegbu, T.O. (2009). Teaching and learning resources. Curriculum theory and practice. Curriculum Organization of Nigeria. Ibadan Press.</p><p>Olumiran, C. O., Yusuf, A., Ajidagba, U. A., & Jekayinfa, A. A. (2010) Development of instructional materials from local resources for art-based courses. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 107-110.</p><p>Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.</p><p>Ostroff, W. (2012). Understanding how young children learn: Bringing the science of child development to the classroom. Virginia: ASCD.</p><p>Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual, 3rd. Edition. McGrath Hill, 15, 361-371.</p><p>Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (4rd Edition): Crows West, New South Wales.</p><p>Peter, O. I., Abiodun, A. P. & Jonathan, O. O. (2010). Effect of constructivism instructional approach on teaching practical skills to mechanical related trade students in Western Nigeria Technical Colleges. International NGO Journals, 5 (3), 59-64.</p><p>Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. and Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459-467.</p><p>Praveen Shaadan & Kwan Eu Leong. (2013). Effectiveness of using GeoGebra on students' understanding in learning circles. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1-11.</p><p>Rabaah Abdullah, Wan Noorlizawati Wan Mat Ali & Adnan Jusoh (2021). Theuse of teaching aids (bbm) in the subject theme of colonization in southeast asia in the 19th century. Perspektif: Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, 13(1), 113.</p><p>Rahmad Bustanul Anwar, Jazim Ahmad & Dwi Rahmawati. (2017). The implementation of constructivism-based mathematics module to increase the students mathematics understanding. International Advisory Board, 440-445.</p><p>Raja NurFarah, Nur Bahirah & Raja LailatulZuraida. (2018). Manipulativekitused in teaching and learning topic addition and subtraction in 21st centuries. Int J Recent Sci Re, 9(11), 29508-29513.</p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Routledge.</p><p>Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. & Nelson, W. A. (2007). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. Handbook of Research forEducational Communication and Technology. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.</p><p>Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: theory, research and practice. Taylor and Francis.</p><p>Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd.</p><p>Rittle-Johnson, B., & Koedinger, K.(2009). Iterating betweenlessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 483-500.</p><p>Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil & Nordin Abd Razak. (2010). Hubungan guru-murid dan kaitannyadengan komiten belajar murid: Adakah guru berkualitimenghasilkan perbezaan pembelajaran antara jantina murid? Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia. 35(2), 61-69.</p><p>Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Educational Technology Publications.</p><p>Royati Abdul Saha, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). The effects of Geogebra on Mathematics achievement: Enlightening Coordinate Geometry learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686693.</p><p>Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104.</p><p>Saedah Siraj, Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah, Rozaini Muhamad Rozkee. (2020). Pendekatan Penyelidikan Rekabentuk dan Pembangunan: Aplikasi Kepada Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Safitri, M., & Aziz, M. R. (2021). Multimedia learning model dick & carrey. KoPeN: Konferensi Pendidikan Nasional, 3(2), 229-235.</p><p>Saifulnizam Othman, Muhammad Hakim Shamshuddin, Mansor Samah & Norazli Aziz. (2017). The use of concrete material in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(8), 2170-2174.</p><p>Saipolbarin Ramli, Muhammad Taufiq Abdul Ghani, Nazri Atoh & Taj Rijal Muhammad Romli. (2019). Integrasi elemen kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (kbat) berasaskan kit media dalam amalan pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan guru pelatih Bahasa Arab. International Journal of Language Education And Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 8(1), 33-44.</p><p>SamiraNikian, Faizah Mohamad Nor& Marzila A. Aziz. (2013). Malaysian teachers perception of applying technology in the classroom. 13th International Educational Technology Conference, 621-627. Diperoleh daripada https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813038251.</p><p></p><p>Sani, S., & Salahudeen, B. (2016). Effects of Geoboard and geographical globe on senior secondary school students performancein mathematics in Kaduna state. ATBU. Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 4(1), 140-148.</p><p>Sarah Kamai, Mursalin, Muliana, Nuraina& Rohantizani.(2021). Theinfluenceof the inside outside circle cooperative learning model on students' mathematical communication ability. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3(3), 177-185.</p><p>Schunk, D. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.</p><p>Seifert, K. (2013). Cognitive development and the education of young children. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children. Routledge.</p><p>Senyefia, B. A. (2017). Effect of physical and virtual manipulatives on the mathematical achievement of junior high school students in the topic of transformation in Ghana. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 4(4), 1-14.</p><p>Shadaan, P., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of using geogebra on students' understanding in learning circles. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1-11.</p><p>Shaiful Shahril Norajoa, Zulhusni Mohd Basri & Mohd Hafiz Abd Latif. (2018). Keberkesanan alat bantu mengajar perform visual inspection on welded joint dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran teknologi kimpalan. E-Proceeding National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (iCompEx 18), 1-16.</p><p>Shamsul Aizuwani Nawi, Mohd. Haidi Mohd Kasran, Zurihan Yusof & Maniyamin Ibrahim (2017). Cakna minda: Kit pembelajaran sokongan kurikulum Bahasa Melayu sekolah rendah. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Bahasa Melayu.</p><p>Sherman, J., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 88 100.</p><p>Sibiya, M. R. (2019). The effect of geoboard use on learners motivation for learning Geometry theorems. International Journal of Sciences and Research, 75(6/1)71-85.</p><p>Sibiya, M. R., & Mudaly, V. (2018). The effects of the geoboard on learner understanding of geometry theorems. International Journal of Science and Research, 74(11), 90-98.</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Siti Fauziah Mohd Amin, Sabariah Sharif, Muhamad Suhaimi Taat, Mad Nor Matjapuni & Muralindran Mariappan. (2022). Implementasi pemeriksaan kebolehgunaan menggunakan kaedah penilaian pakar dalam fasa penilaian modul robot m-solat. Psychology, 7(45), 222-233.</p><p>Siti Munirah Mohd Nasir, Zamzana Zamzamir, Norain Mohd Tajudin, Ruzlan Md. Ali, Masliza Siti Ramli & Endah Retnowati. (2021). Design and development of an isometric transformations game-based learning kit. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(4), 907-917.</p><p>Siti Noor Ismail, Shamsuddin Muhammad, Abdul Ghani Kanesan & Ruzlan Md Ali (2019). The Influence of Teachers' Perception and Readiness towards the Implementation of Critical Thinking Skills (CTS) Practice in Mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 337-352.</p><p>Slavin, R.A. (2014). Making cooperative learning powerful. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 2227.</p><p>Slavin, R.A. (2017). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Johns Hopkins University: Pearson.</p><p>Syahida Nadia Zakaria. (2016). Kesan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan pendekatan tradisional dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran komponen sastera bahasa melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 12-21.</p><p>Ummi Salehah Hamzah & Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri. (2020). Kajian metaanalisis: keberkesanan pembelajaran koperatif terhadap motivasi pembelajaran murid. Jurnal Penyelidikan Sains Sosial (JOSSR), 3(9), 21 -33.</p><p>Unamba, E. C., Ugochkwu, N. J., & Ijeoma, N. (2015). Effect of Learning-Together technique on pupils achievement in primary mathematics. Jurnal Research in Education and Society, 6(1), 59-65.</p><p>Usmadi, Hayatul Hasanah & Ergusni.(2020). Theimpact of the implementation three-step Interview cooperative learning model in mathematics learning toward the learners activities and outcomes. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 3(1), 8-12.</p><p>Van Hoorn, J., Nourot, P. M., Scales, B., & Alward, K. R. (2011). Play at the center of the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education.</p><p>Vejvodova, J.(2015). The ADDIE model: Dead or alive. University of West Bohemia. Diperoleh daripada http://virtuni.eas.sk/rocnik/2009/pdf/paper-_127.pdf</p><p></p><p>Wan Muhammad Azamuddin, Norazman Arbin & Norsyazana Kamarudin. (2022). Development of the isometric trio kit of form two translations topic. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(1), 22-31.</p><p>Wan Syafika Nabila Wan Hashim. (2020). Pembinaan kit pengajaran Fun Respiration Box subtopik struktur respirasi dan mekanisme pernafasan manusia biologi tingkatan 4. [Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Wartono, J. T., Batlolona, J. R., & Grusche, S. (2018). Inquiry-Discovery empowering high order thinking skills and scientific literacy on Substance Pressure topic. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 7(2), 139-151.</p><p>Wiersma, W. (1991). Research methods in education. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p>Yavuzsoy, K. N. (2012). Primary school students' knowledge of line symmetry. H. U. Journal of Education, 42, 274-286.</p><p>Yilmaz, G. K. (2015). The effect of dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on candidate teachers transformational geometry success. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1417-1435.</p><p>Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183-187.</p><p>Zulirfan, Zanaton Iksan & Tamby Subahan Mohd Meerah. (2017). Pengembangan kit take-home experiment cahaya dan optik sebagai media pembelajaran sains siswa SLTP. Jurnal Geliga Sains 5(1), 1-7.</p><p>Zuraidah Abdullah & Junaidah Mohamed Kassim. (2010). The digital library usability testing. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 9(1), 71-82.</p><p>Zuriatun Hasanah. (2021). Model pembelajaran kooperatif dalam menumbuhkan keaktifan belajar siswa. Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 1(1), 1-13.</p><p></p>

Similar Items