Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menkaji kesan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E (engage,</p><p>explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate) terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian sains murid Tahun 3. Istilah ketumpata...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10449 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:10449 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Nantha Kumar Sivaperumal Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menkaji kesan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E (engage,</p><p>explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate) terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian sains murid Tahun 3. Istilah ketumpatan merupakan istilah baru yang</p><p>diperkenalkan di tahun 3 mulai tahun 2019. Murid-murid didapati menghadapi masalah</p><p>dalam memahami konsep tajuk ini. Bagi mengatasi masalah tersebut satu kajian</p><p>dibentuk dan dilaksanakan di sebuah sekolah untuk mengenalpasti kesan pendekatan</p><p>inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains dalam</p><p>kalangan murid tahun 3 serta persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan inkuiri 5E dalam</p><p>pembelajaran sains. Kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatif digunakan dalam kajian ini.</p><p>Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi-eksperimen di sebuah sekolah di negeri</p><p>Selangor. Seramai 70 orang murid Tahun 3 terlibat dan mereka telah dibahagikan</p><p>kepada dua kumpulan iaitu 35 murid dalam kumpulan rawatan dan 35 murid dalam</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Murid kumpulan rawatan (n=35) mengikuti pembelajaran sains</p><p>melalui kaedah inkuiri 5E manakala murid kumpulan kawalan (n=35) diajar</p><p>menggunakan kaedah tradisional. Pencapaian diukur melalui ujian pra dan ujian pasca</p><p>yang terdiri daripada 20 item soalan aneka pilihan dan 4 soalan subjektif. Selain itu</p><p>persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan inkuiri 5E diukur dengan menggunakan soal</p><p>selidik 18 item mengikut tahap model 5E. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANCOVA dan</p><p>ANOVA untuk membandingkan skor pencapaian dan persepsi murid di antara keduadua</p><p>kumpulan. Hasil dapatan menunjukkan bahawa min ujian pasca kumpulan rawatan</p><p>mencatatkan min yang tinggi (min=38.80, sp=4.58) berbanding kumpulan kawalan</p><p>(min=30.45 sp= 3.29) dalam ujian. Tambahan pula, analisis ujian T menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa terdapat perbezaan signifikan antara persepsi murid sebelum intervensi dan</p><p>selepas intervensi, t(68)=-17.689, p=.000, iaitu Nilai p<0.05. Dapatan kajian ini</p><p>menunjukkan bahawa kaedah inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan memberi kesan</p><p>positif terhadap pencapaian dan meningkatkan persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan</p><p>inkuiri 5E dalam tajuk ketumpatan. Implikasi kajian ini kepada semua pihak yang</p><p>terlibat dalam dunia pembelajaran terutamanya kalangan guru bagi meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian murid dalam matapelajaran sains.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Nantha Kumar Sivaperumal |
| author_facet |
Nantha Kumar Sivaperumal |
| author_sort |
Nantha Kumar Sivaperumal |
| title |
Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| title_short |
Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| title_full |
Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| title_fullStr |
Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 |
| title_sort |
keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5e terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian sains murid tahun 3 |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10449 |
| _version_ |
1804890556579446784 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:104492024-06-20 Keberkesanan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains murid tahun 3 2023 Nantha Kumar Sivaperumal LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menkaji kesan penggunaan pendekatan inkuiri 5E (engage,</p><p>explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate) terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian sains murid Tahun 3. Istilah ketumpatan merupakan istilah baru yang</p><p>diperkenalkan di tahun 3 mulai tahun 2019. Murid-murid didapati menghadapi masalah</p><p>dalam memahami konsep tajuk ini. Bagi mengatasi masalah tersebut satu kajian</p><p>dibentuk dan dilaksanakan di sebuah sekolah untuk mengenalpasti kesan pendekatan</p><p>inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan bagi meningkatkan pencapaian Sains dalam</p><p>kalangan murid tahun 3 serta persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan inkuiri 5E dalam</p><p>pembelajaran sains. Kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatif digunakan dalam kajian ini.</p><p>Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi-eksperimen di sebuah sekolah di negeri</p><p>Selangor. Seramai 70 orang murid Tahun 3 terlibat dan mereka telah dibahagikan</p><p>kepada dua kumpulan iaitu 35 murid dalam kumpulan rawatan dan 35 murid dalam</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Murid kumpulan rawatan (n=35) mengikuti pembelajaran sains</p><p>melalui kaedah inkuiri 5E manakala murid kumpulan kawalan (n=35) diajar</p><p>menggunakan kaedah tradisional. Pencapaian diukur melalui ujian pra dan ujian pasca</p><p>yang terdiri daripada 20 item soalan aneka pilihan dan 4 soalan subjektif. Selain itu</p><p>persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan inkuiri 5E diukur dengan menggunakan soal</p><p>selidik 18 item mengikut tahap model 5E. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANCOVA dan</p><p>ANOVA untuk membandingkan skor pencapaian dan persepsi murid di antara keduadua</p><p>kumpulan. Hasil dapatan menunjukkan bahawa min ujian pasca kumpulan rawatan</p><p>mencatatkan min yang tinggi (min=38.80, sp=4.58) berbanding kumpulan kawalan</p><p>(min=30.45 sp= 3.29) dalam ujian. Tambahan pula, analisis ujian T menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa terdapat perbezaan signifikan antara persepsi murid sebelum intervensi dan</p><p>selepas intervensi, t(68)=-17.689, p=.000, iaitu Nilai p<0.05. Dapatan kajian ini</p><p>menunjukkan bahawa kaedah inkuiri 5E terhadap tajuk ketumpatan memberi kesan</p><p>positif terhadap pencapaian dan meningkatkan persepsi murid terhadap pendekatan</p><p>inkuiri 5E dalam tajuk ketumpatan. Implikasi kajian ini kepada semua pihak yang</p><p>terlibat dalam dunia pembelajaran terutamanya kalangan guru bagi meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian murid dalam matapelajaran sains.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10449 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10449 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia <p>Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st century skills through a constructivist-constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 205-216.</p><p>Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry-based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 64-90.</p><p>Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R. M., & Wright, T. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Guided Inquiry-Based, Teachers' Professional Development Programme on Saudi Students' Understanding of Density. Science Education International, 27(1), 16-39.</p><p>Arsad, N. M., Osman, K., & Embi, M. A. (2017). Effect Of Stem-5e Learning Cycle (Am-Stem Kids Module) In Fostering Noble Values Among Elementary School Children. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 6, 160-166</p><p>Arens, K. (2021). Pedagogy as Epistemology: Building the Subject of Knowledge. Herbartism in Austrian Philosophy, 11, 85.</p><p>Bacos, C., & Grove, K. (2019, March). Using online education to improve traditional classroom instruction: A blended learning approach. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 374-379). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).</p><p>Bakar, M. A., Mukhtar, M., & Khalid, F. (2019). The Development of a Visual Output Approach for Programming via the Application of Cognitive Load Theory and Constructivism. Development, 10(11), 305-312.</p><p>Bernauer, J., & Fuller, R. G. (2017). Beyond Measurement-Driven Instruction: Achieving Deep Learning Based on Constructivist Learning Theory, Integrated Assessment, and a Flipped Classroom Approach. [Unpublished masters thesis]. Robert Morris University</p><p>Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills: Defining the problem. The Phi Delta Kappan, 65(7), 486-490.</p><p>Beyer, B. K. (1994). Gone but not forgottenReflections on the New Social Studies movement. The Social Studies, 85(6), 251-255.</p><p>Bezen, S., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Teaching Mechanical Waves by Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 875-892.</p><p>Bibi, W., Butt, M. N., & Reba, A. (2020). Relating Teachers' Questioning Techniques with Students' Learning within the Context of Bloom's Taxonomy. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1).</p><p>Borreguero, G. M., Correa, F. L. N., Nez, M. M., & Martn, J. S. (2018). Recreational experiences for teaching basic scientific concepts in primary education: The case of density and pressure. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1616.</p><p>Burner, T., & Svendsen, B. (2020). Activity TheoryLev Vygotsky, Aleksei Leontev, Yrj Engestrm. In Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 311-322). Springer, Cham.</p><p>Braun, S. S., Roeser, R. W., Mashburn, A. J., & Skinner, E. (2019). Middle school teachers mindfulness, occupational health and well-being, and the quality of teacher-student interactions. Mindfulness, 10(2), 245-255.</p><p>Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Evaluating teacher and student spatial transition from a traditional classroom to an innovative learning environment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 156-166.</p><p>Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning?. In Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1-23). Springer, Cham.</p><p>Choirunnisa, N. L., Prabowo, P., & Suryanti, S. (2018). Improving science process skills for primary school students through 5E instructional model-based learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947, No. 1, p. 012021). IOP Publishing.</p><p>Cook, D. L. (1962). The Hawthorne effect in educational research. The Phi Delta Kappan, 44(3), 116-122.</p><p>Denton, M., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2020). Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 556-580.</p><p>Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education (1916). Jo Ann Boydston (ed.). The Middle Works of John Dewey, 9, 1899-1924.</p><p>Ekpenyong, L. E. (2018). Constructivist approaches: An emerging paradigm for the teaching and learning of business education. Nigerian Journal of Business Education (NIGJBED), 3(1), 149-158.</p><p>Dodge, M. M. (2017). The effect of the 5E instructional model on student engagement and transfer of knowledge in a 9th grade environmental science differentiated classroom. [Unpublished masters thesis]. Montanta State University.</p><p>Dole, S., Clarke, D., Wright, T., & Hilton, G. (2009, January). Developing year 5 students understanding of density: Implications for mathematics teaching. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 153-160).</p><p>Enugu, R., & Hokayem, H. (2017). Challenges Pre-Service Teachers Face When Implementing a 5E Inquiry Model of Instruction. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-209.</p><p>Fusaro, M., & Smith, M. C. (2018). Preschoolers inquisitiveness and science-relevant problem solving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 119-127.</p><p>Frketic, J. B., Psulkowski, S., Sharp, A., & Dickens, T. (2017). Dexterous printing and fabrication of multi-functional parts: Design for science and engineering education.</p><p>The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441-1458.</p><p>Gayle, B., Preiss, R., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning? In B. Gayle, R. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 279293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Gray, R., McDonald, S., & Stroupe, D. (2022). What you find depends on how you see: examining asset and deficit perspectives of preservice science teachers knowledge and learning. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 49-80.</p><p>Grier-Reed, T., & Williams-Wengerd, A. (2018). Integrating Universal Design, culturally sustaining practices, and constructivism to advance inclusive pedagogy in the undergraduate classroom. Education Sciences, 8(4), 1-14.</p><p>Hadi, S. A., Susantini, E., & Agustini, R. (2018). Training of students critical thinking skills through the implementation of a modified free inquiry model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 947, No. 1, p. 012063). IOP Publishing.</p><p>Handayani, A. D., Herman, T., Fatimah, S., Setyowidodo, I., & Katminingsih, Y. (2018, May). Inquiry based learning: a student centered learning to develop mathematical habits of mind. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013, No. 1, p. 012115). IOP Publishing.</p><p>Harahap, M. B., & Bukit, N. (2020). Integrated Science Learning Development of Model Inquiry Training Based on Comics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1428, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing.</p><p>Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Yusuff, N. A. N., & Mansor, R. (2017). Pembangunan modul kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di dalam mata pelajaran sains sekolah rendah: analisis keperluan guru. Sains Humanika, 9, 1-5.</p><p>Herayanti, L., Widodo, W., Susantini, E., & Gunawan, G. (2019). Blended Learning Based Inquiry Collaborative Tutorial Model for Physics Students. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 8(2), 1676-1683.</p><p>Hew, K. F., Zhu, Y., & Lo, C. K. (2018, January). Designing and evaluating postgraduate courses based on a 5E-flipped classroom model: a two-case mixed-method study. In International Conference on Technology in Education (pp. 109-120). Springer, Singapore.</p><p>Ismail, M. E., Samsudin, M. A., Amin, N. F. M., Kamarudin, N., Daud, K. A. M., & Halim, L. (2018). Contributing factors to science achievement in TIMSS Malaysia: Direct model and indirect model. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.30), 423-428.</p><p>Jack, G. U. (2017). The Effect of Learning Cycle Constructivist-Based Approach on Students' Academic Achievement and Attitude towards Chemistry in Secondary Schools in North-Eastern Part of Nigeria. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(7), 456-466.</p><p>Kamary, N. M., & Hamzah, M. (2019). Kesediaan guru matematik Daerah Kuala Langat dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran abad ke 21. In Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN 2019) (pp. 110-130).</p><p>Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning experiences on adolescents science-related career aspiration in the Finnish context. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1669-1689.</p><p>Karamlou, T., Rao, R., & Najm, H. (2019). Collaborative Learning Models in Pediatric Cardiac Care: The Continuum of Learning and Positive Change Through Shared Inquiry. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 107(5), 1293-1296.</p><p>Karim, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Ujian Kemahiran Proses Sains untuk Murid Sekolah Rendah Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch (Validity and Reliability of Science Process Skills Test for Primary School Pupils based on Rasch Measurement Model). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 43(3), 1-9.</p><p>Karimi, R., & Khademi, M. (2017). The content analysis of 7th grade science textbook's exercises based on Suchman inquiry model. Research in Curriculum Planning, 14(54), 75-87.</p><p>Kenklies, K. (2012). Educational theory as topological rhetoric: The concepts of pedagogy of Johann Friedrich Herbart and Friedrich Schleiermacher. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 265-273.</p><p>Khalaf, B. K. (2018). Traditional and Inquiry-Based Learning Pedagogy: A Systematic Critical Review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564.</p><p>Khamis, N., Phang, F.A., & Rahman, N.F.A. (2018). Learning Physics through Practical Work at School Laboratories. Advanced Science Letters, 24(1), 41-43.</p><p>KPM. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum & Pentaksiran Sains. Kuala Lumpur: BPK, KPM.</p><p>Kusumawati, I., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Pendidikan Moral Anak Usia Dini Melalui Pendekatan Konstruktivis. Academy of Education Journal, 10(01), 63-75.</p><p>Laksana, D. N. L. (2017). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning for natural science learning in elementary school. Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 1-5.</p><p>Landerer, C., & Huemer, W. (2018). Johann Friedrich Herbart on Mind. Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century, 5, 60-76.</p><p>Lim, C. S., & Chew, C. M. (2019). Implementation of school-based assessment (SBA) in Malaysian primary mathematics curriculum: Issues and challenges. School Mathematics Curricula, 189-205.</p><p>Maciejewski, M. L. (2020). Quasi-experimental design. Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 4(1), 38-47.</p><p>Maharani, P. (2017, September). Effect of Inkuiri Learning Model on Learning Outcomes Student Primary Teacher Education in Course Learning Civic Education Elementary School. In 9th International Conference for Science Educators and Teachers (ICSET 2017) (pp. 529-534). Atlantis Press.</p><p>Mai, M. Y., Yusuf, M., & Saleh, M. (2019). Content Analysis for Critical Thinking Skills in the Lower Primary School Science Textbooks in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 6(1), 83-91.</p><p>McHaney, R., Reiter, L., & Reychav, I. (2018). Immersive simulation in constructivist-based classroom E-Learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(1), 39-64.</p><p>McNew-Birren, J., & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74-87.</p><p>Minarni, A., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2020). The role of constructivism-based learning in improving mathematical high order thinking skills of indonesian students. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 111-132.</p><p>Mubarak, A. A. (2019). Malaysian Studentsachievement In Timss 2011: Does Science Inquiry Really Matter? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 1-25.</p><p>Murshed, M., Phang, F. A. & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2020). Transformation of Multiple Representations in Understanding Real-World Physics Problems. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5413-5425</p><p>Nachiappan, S., Muthaiah, L., & Suffian, S. (2017). Analisis sikap murid terhadap mata pelajaran Sains di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (Tamil). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 85-105.</p><p>5E Inquiry Learning Model: Its Effect on Science Achievement among Malaysian Year 5 Indian Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 348-360.</p><p>5E inquiry learning model: its effect on science achievement among Malaysian Year 5 Indian Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 348-360.</p><p>Ong, E. T., Keok, B. L., Yingprayoon, J., Singh, C. K. S., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2020). The Effect of 5E Inquiry Learning Model on the Science Achievement in the Learning of Magnet among Year 3 Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 1-10.</p><p>Ong, E. T., Keok, B. L., Yingprayoon, J., Singh, C. K. S., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2020). The effect of 5E inquiry learning model on the science achievement in the learning of Magnet among year 3 students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 1-10.</p><p>Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Singh, C. K. S., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N. A., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2021). THE 5E INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL: ITS EFFECT ON THE LEARNING OF ELECTRICITY AMONG MALAYSIAN STUDENTS. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1).</p><p>Onyema, E. M., Ogechukwu, U., & Anthonia, E. C. D. (2019). Potentials of mobile technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning approach. International Journal of Education (IJE), 2(01).</p><p>Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., & Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery LearningJerome Bruner. In Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 177-190). Springer, Cham.</p><p>Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinkingA constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637.</p><p>Paradis, E., & Sutkin, G. (2017). Beyond a good story: From Hawthorne effect to reactivity in health professions education research. Medical Education, 51(1), 3139. https://doi.org/10. 1111/medu.13122</p><p>Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2019). Promoting interest in science through inquiry-based learning in undergraduate linguistics: A case study. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(1), 7-1.</p><p>Peters, R. F., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Komunikasi dan Kefahaman Maklumat Saintifik dalam Buku Teks Sains Sekolah Rendah: Satu Kajian Kes tentang Kaedah Penyampaian (Communication and Understanding of Sciencetific Information in Primary Science Textbooks: A Case Study about Delivery Methode). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 42(2), 79-86.</p><p>Phang, F. A., Khamis, N., Nawi, N. D., & Pusppanathan, J. (2020). TIMSS 2019 Science Grade 8: Where is Malaysia standing?. Journal of Engineering Education, 4(2), 37-43.</p><p>Pholphuet, P., Kanyaprasith, K., Khumwong, P., & Praphairaksit, N. (2018, January). The effect of integrating cooperative learning into 5E inquiry learning model on interpersonal skills of high school students. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030038). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019529</p><p>Closing the science process skills gap between students with high- and low-level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266.</p><p>PRAYOGI, S., & YUANITA, L. (2018). Critical inquiry-based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56.</p><p>Puteh, M., Aziz, A. A. M. A., Tajudin, N. M., & Adnan, M. (2018). Developing a secondary mathematics higher order thinking skills assessment (SMHOTSA) instrument. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 8, 1238-1246.</p><p>Raghavan, N. (2017). Teaching Archimedes' principle to sixth graders without teaching mass, density, pressure, volume or buoyancy. Teaching Science, 63(3), 39.</p><p>Rahman N. F. A. & Phang, F. A. (2016). Comparing Teachers Scientific Epistemological Stances and Development. Man In India, 96(1-2), 501-512.</p><p>Ramasamy, M., & Wahab, J. L. A. (2020). Amalan Kepimpinan Instruksional Guru Besar Di Sekolah Kebangsaan Daerah Kuala Langat. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(2), 1-8.</p><p>Ramirez, M. S. G. (2018). A Qualitative Analysis of Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of a Non-Traditional Classroom [Doctoral dissertation] Valdosta State University.</p><p>Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in terms of Gender Using Science Teaching Materials Based on The 5E Learning Cycle Integrated with Local Wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187-199.</p><p>Ramlee, N., Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2019). Mathematical HOTS Cultivation via Online Learning Environment and 5E Inquiry Model: Cognitive Impact and the Learning Activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(24), 140-151.</p><p>Ramnarain, U., & Hlatswayo, M. (2018). Teacher beliefs and attitudes about inquiry-based learning in a rural school district in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 38(1).</p><p>Ranjan, S., & Padmanabhan, J. (2018). 5E approach of constructivist on achievement in mathematics at upper primary level. Educational Quest, 9(3), 239-245.</p><p>Rifandi, R. & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019, October). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: a literature review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317, No. 1, p. 012208). IOP Publishing</p><p>Robertson, S. L. (2019). Interactive digital instruction: pedagogy of the 21st century classroom. In Handbook of research on promoting higher-order skills and global competencies in life and work (pp. 166-180). DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6331-0.ch011.</p><p>Ruzaman, N. (2020). Inquiry-Based Education: Innovation in Participatory Inquiry Paradigm. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(10), 4-15.</p><p>Ryan, J., Jameson, J. M., Coleman, O. F., Eichelberger, C., Bowman, J. A., Conradi, L. A., ... & McDonnell, J. (2019). Inclusive social studies content instruction for students with significant intellectual disability using structured inquiry-based instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 420-436.</p><p>Saad, A. (2020). Students' Computational Thinking Skill through Cooperative Learning Based on Hands-on, Inquiry-based, and Student-centric Learning Approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 290-296.</p><p>Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., Dewitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking in science among secondary school students: a fuzzy Delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847-866.</p><p>Sari, U., Hassan, A. H., Gven, K., & Sen, . F. (2017). Effects of the 5E teaching model using interactive simulation on achievement and attitude in physics education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(3).</p><p>Saunders, M., Lewis, P. H. I. L. I. P., & Thornhill, A. D. R. I. A. N. (2007). Research methods. Business Students 4th edition Pearson Education Limited, England.</p><p>Schallert, S., Lavicza, Z., & Vandervieren, E. (2020). Merging flipped classroom approaches with the 5E inquiry model: a design heuristic. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-18.</p><p>Sen, S., & Oskay, O. O. (2017). The Effects of 5E Inquiry Learning Activities on Achievement and Attitude toward Chemistry. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1-9.</p><p>Shanmugam, K., & Balakrishnan, B. (2020). Microsoft power point as a presentation tool for teaching and facilitating science in rural Tamil schools in Perak [Perisian microsoft power point sebagai peranti persembahan semasa pdpc sains di SJK (T) luar bandar di negeri Perak]. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 49-65.</p><p>Shanmugavelu, G., Ariffin, K., Vadivelu, M., Mahayudin, Z., & Sundaram, M. A. R. (2020). Questioning Techniques and Teachers' Role in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 45-49.</p><p>Teachers' Readiness to Use Inquiry-Based Learning: An Investigation of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Attitudes toward Inquiry-Based Learning. Science Education International, 28(4), 315-325.</p><p>Slavin, R. E. (1994). Quality, appropriateness, incentive, and time: A model of instructional effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 141-157.</p><p>Stofflett, R. T., & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 31(1), 31-51.</p><p>Suarez, A., Specht, M., Prinsen, F., Kalz, M., & Ternier, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38-55.</p><p>Sinnema, C., Meyer, F., & Aitken, G. (2017). Capturing the complex, situated, and active nature of teaching through inquiry-oriented standards for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 9-27.</p><p>Supardan, H. D. (2016). Teori Dan Praktik Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. Edunomic Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 4(1), 1-12.</p><p>Taber, K. S. (2019). Constructivism in education: Interpretations and criticisms from science education. In Early childhood development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 312-342). IGI Global.</p><p>Taherdoost, H (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18-27</p><p>Thomassen, A. O., & Jrgensen, K. M. (2020). John Dewey and continuing management education: problem-based learning for organizational sustainability. Journal of Workplace Learning.</p><p>Thompson, P. W. (2020). Constructivism in mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 127-134). Cham: Springer International Publishing.</p><p>The Application of Practice Rehearsal Pairs (PRP) Method to Develop Inquisitiveness of Learning in Students. KnE Social Sciences, 269-279.</p><p>Valdemarin, V. T. (2022). The circulation of Johann Friedrich Herbarts ideas in North American textbooks (18931920).</p><p>Student explanations in the context of computational science and engineering education. Cognition and Instruction, 37(2), 201-231.</p><p>Wardani, I., & Djukri, D. (2019). Teaching science process skill using guided inquiry model with starter experiment approach: An experimental study. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 277-284.</p><p>Wheeler, L. B., Clark, C. P., & Grisham, C. M. (2017). Transforming a traditional laboratory to an inquiry-based course: Importance of training TAs when redesigning a curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1019-1026.</p><p>Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2012). Student difficulties in learning density: A distributed cognition perspective. Research in science education, 42(4), 769-789.</p><p>Yakob, N., Kaliun, K., Ahmad, A. M., Rashid, R. A. A., & Abdullah, A. (2020). The Effect of Coupled Inquiry-5E in Enhancing the Understanding of Meiosis Concept. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 129-137.</p><p>Yin, Q., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2020). Blending constructivism and instructivism: A study of classroom dialogue in Singapore kindergartens. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(4), 583-600.</p><p>Yong, X. H. & Phang, F. A. (2015). Science and Arts Streams Students Scientific Epistemological Beliefs. International Education Studies, 8(13), 88-92.</p><p>Yuh, T. J., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2020). Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dan Prestasi Murid Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di Hulu Langat, Selangor. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(3), 70-90.</p><p>Yusoff, W., & Selman, S. (2018). Teachers' Knowledge of Higher Order Thinking and Questioning Skills: A Case Study at a Primary School in Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. Retrieved from http://dx. doi. org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i2/4120.</p><p>Zhou, C. (2021). The effectiveness of 5E model to improve the scientific creativity of teachers in rural areas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100900.</p><p>Zin, A. F. M., Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2019, August). Effectiveness of online learning environment in improving thinking skill in mathematics. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2138, No. 1, p. 050039). AIP Publishing LLC.</p><p></p> |