Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)

Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)

Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalammeningkatkan pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagimata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional‘chalk-and-talk’. Instrumen kajian ya...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Seow Yea Pyng
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2011
Subjects:
H Social Sciences (General)
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=354
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:354
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
Seow Yea Pyng
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
description Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalammeningkatkan pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagimata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional‘chalk-and-talk’. Instrumen kajian yang digunakan ialah Ujian Pra dan UjianPencapaian, rancangan mengajar harian dan soal selidik. Kajian ini dilaksanakandengan menggunakan reka bentuk eksperimen kuasi. Responden kajian terdiridaripada 64 orang pelajar Tingkatan Empat di sebuah sekolah menengah DaerahKinta Selatan, Perak. Seramai 34 orang pelajar dari sebuah kelas dijadikan kumpulanrawatan yang mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif, sementara 30 orangpelajar dari satu kelas lagi dijadikan kumpulan kawalan yang mengikuti kaedahtradisional ‘chalk-and-talk’. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik AnalisisKovarians (ANCOVA) dan Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan. Hasil ANCOVAmenunjukkan terdapat kesan kaedah pembelajaran aktif yang signifikan terhadappencapaian akademik pelajar berbanding dengan kaedah pengajaran tradisional‘chalk-and-talk’ bagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Manakala hasilanalisis Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatanminat dan motivasi para pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktivitiaktivitipembelajaran aktif dalam kelas Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Namunbegitu, tiada peningkatan interaksi sosial di kalangan pelajar yang signifikan selepasmereka mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif. Implikasi dapatan kajian inimencadangkan bahawa pihak guru, pentadbir sekolah dan KPM wajar menggalakkandan memperluaskan pengaplikasian kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam prosespengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat untukmeningkatkan lagi pencapaian akademik, minat dan motivasi pelajar terbabit.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Seow Yea Pyng
author_facet Seow Yea Pyng
author_sort Seow Yea Pyng
title Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
title_short Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
title_full Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
title_fullStr Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
title_full_unstemmed Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR)
title_sort persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (ir)
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Faculty of Management & Economics
publishDate 2011
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=354
_version_ 1747832878661632000
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:3542020-02-27 Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat (IR) 2011 Seow Yea Pyng H Social Sciences (General) Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalammeningkatkan pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagimata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional‘chalk-and-talk’. Instrumen kajian yang digunakan ialah Ujian Pra dan UjianPencapaian, rancangan mengajar harian dan soal selidik. Kajian ini dilaksanakandengan menggunakan reka bentuk eksperimen kuasi. Responden kajian terdiridaripada 64 orang pelajar Tingkatan Empat di sebuah sekolah menengah DaerahKinta Selatan, Perak. Seramai 34 orang pelajar dari sebuah kelas dijadikan kumpulanrawatan yang mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif, sementara 30 orangpelajar dari satu kelas lagi dijadikan kumpulan kawalan yang mengikuti kaedahtradisional ‘chalk-and-talk’. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik AnalisisKovarians (ANCOVA) dan Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan. Hasil ANCOVAmenunjukkan terdapat kesan kaedah pembelajaran aktif yang signifikan terhadappencapaian akademik pelajar berbanding dengan kaedah pengajaran tradisional‘chalk-and-talk’ bagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Manakala hasilanalisis Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatanminat dan motivasi para pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktivitiaktivitipembelajaran aktif dalam kelas Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Namunbegitu, tiada peningkatan interaksi sosial di kalangan pelajar yang signifikan selepasmereka mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif. Implikasi dapatan kajian inimencadangkan bahawa pihak guru, pentadbir sekolah dan KPM wajar menggalakkandan memperluaskan pengaplikasian kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam prosespengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat untukmeningkatkan lagi pencapaian akademik, minat dan motivasi pelajar terbabit. 2011 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=354 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=354 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Faculty of Management & Economics Abrami, P., Chamber, B., Poulsen, C., Simone, C.D., d’Appollania, S., & Howden, J.(1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperativelearning. Toronto: Harecourt Brace Jovanovich.Alexander, W.R.J., & McDougall, R.S. (2001). Collaborative problem solving instudent learning. Economics Discussion Papers No.0110, Department ofEconomics, University of Otago.Armsden, G.C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peerattachment: Relationships to well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth andAdolescence, 16(5), 427-454.Ary, D., Jacob, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: WadswothAsmah Hj Ahmad (1989). Pedagogi I. Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.Atkinson, J. (Ed.). (1958). Motives in fantasy, action and society. New York: VanNostrand.Bartlett, R.L. (2006). The evolution of cooperative learning and economics instruction.In W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: Morealternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 39-58). Cheltenham, UK: Edward ElgarPublishing.Becker, W.E. (1997). Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of EconomicLiterature, 35(9), 1347-1373.Becker, W.E. (1998). Engaging student in quantitative analysis with the academic andpopular press. In W. E. Becker & M. Watts (Eds.), Teaching economics: Morealternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 241-267). Cheltenham, UK: Edward ElgarPublishing.Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (1995). A review of teaching methods in undergraduateeconomics. Economic Inquiry, 33(4), 692-700.Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and talk: A national survey on teachingundergraduate economics. American Economic Review, 86 (May), 448-453.Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century:Still chalk and talk. American Economic Review, 91 (May), 446-451.Beeby, C. (1966). The quality of education in developing countries. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Beeby, C. (1986). The stages of growth in educational systems. In S. Heyneman & D.White (Eds.) The quality of education and economic development: A WorldBank Symposium (pp. 37-44). Washington, DC: World Bank.Biggs, J.B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. BritishJournal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266-279.Biggs, J.B., & Moore, P.J. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). New York:Prentice Hall.Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification ofeducational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. NewYork: Academic Press.Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in theclassroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC:The George Washington University, School of Education and HumanDevelopment.Borg, M.O., & Shapiro, S.L. (1996). Personality type and student performance inprinciples of economics. The Journal of Economics Education, 27(1), 3-25.Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity.Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071Brokaw, A.J., & Merz, T.E. (2004). Active learning with Monty Hall in a game theoryclass. Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 259-268.Brooks, T.B., & Khandker, A.W. (2002). A colloborative learning lab: Does the formmatter?. Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(3), 330-338.Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Buckles, S., & Hoyt, G.M. (2006). Using active learning techniques in large lectureclasses. In W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics:More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 75-88). Cheltenham, UK: EdwardElgar Publishing.Budd, J.W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. Journal of EconomicsEducation, 35(1), 35-46.Burden, P.R., & Byrd, D.M. (1994). Methods for effective teaching. Boston: Allynand Bacon.Carlson, J., & Schodt, D. (1995). Beyond the lecture case teaching and the learning ofeconomic theory. Journal of Economic Education, 26(Winter), 17-28.Carlson, J.L., & Skaggs, N.T. (2000). Learning by trial and error: A case for mootcourts. Journal of Economic Education, 31(2), 145-155.Carlson, J.A., & Velenchik, A. (2006). Using the case method in the economicsclassroom. In W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teachingeconomics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 59-74). Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing.Carpick, R.W. (2002). Who wants to be an engineer? - or better teaching throughgames shows. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition (session 1630). Montreal,Canada: American Society for Engineering Education.Chee, K.M. (1996). Pandangan pelajar terhadap kaedah pengajaran guru PrinsipAkaun, Perdagangan dan Ekonomi Asas di beberapa buah sekolah menengahdi Pulau Pinang. Jurnal Pendidikan GERAK, 7, 23-28.Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice. AAHEBulletin, 39 (Mac), 3-7.Christoffersen, S. (2002). An active learning tool for the principles of economics: Theallocation exercise. American Economist, 46(2), 65-68.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Buku 1: Kaedah penyelidikan.Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Cohn, C.L. (1999). Cooperative learning in macroeconomics course: A teamsimulation. College Teaching, 47(2), 51-54.Crandall, D.P. (1983). The teacher’s role in school improvement. EducationalLeadership, 38, 6-9.Cross, P.K. (1987). Teaching for learning. AAHE Bulletin, 39(April), 2-7.de Baessa, Y., Chesterfield, R., & Ramos, T. (2002). Active learning and democraticbehavior in Guatemalan rural schools. Compare, 32(2), 205-218.Dixit, A. (2006). Restoring fun to game theory. In W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R.Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 1-20). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Effandi Zakaria & Abd. Razak Habib (2006). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif ataspelajar matrikulasi dalam mata pelajaran matematik. Jurnal Teknologi, 45, 43-62.Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences; an integrated approachto designing college courses. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass, A Wiley ImprintFraenkel, J.R. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3rd ed.).United States of America: Mcgraw-Hill, Inc.Fredericksen, E. (1998). Minority students and the learning community experience: Acluster experiment. TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Gay, L.R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River,NJ: Merrill.Ginsburg, M. (2009). Active-learning pedagogies as a reform initiative: Synthesis ofcase studies. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research under theEQUIP1 LWA. Diperoleh Ogos 1, 2010, daripadahttp://www.equip123.net/docs.Gordon, R.R., Rogers, A.M., Comfort, M., Gavula, N., & McGee, B.P. (2001). Ataste of problem-based learning increases achievement in urban minoritymiddle-school students. Educational Horizons, 79(4), 171-175.Gourney, F.A. (2000). A classroom simulation based on political polling to helpstudent understand sampling distribution. Journal of Statistic Education, 8(3).Diperoleh Mac 10, 2008, daripadahttp://www.amstet.org/publication/jse/secure.Grant, S. (2006). Professional development for teachers: Teaching and assessingskills in economics. UK: Cambridge University Press.Gremmen, H., & Potters, J. (1997). Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economiceducation. Journal of Economic Education, 28 (Fall), 291-303.Gunter, M.A. (1995). Instruction to models approach. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. Traditional methods: a six-thousandstudentsurvey of mechanics test data for introductory Physics courses.American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.Halimah Harun (2002). Ke arah meningkatkan profesionalisme guru. Adakahpengajaran anda berkesan? Prosiding Kebangsaan Profesion Perguruan (pp.301-319). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Hansen, W.L. (2001). Expected proficiencies for undergraduate economics majors.Journal of Economic Education, 32 (Summer), 231-242.Hansen, W.L., Salemi, M.K., & Siegfried, J.J. (2002). Use it or lose it: Teachingeconomic literacy in the economics principles course. American EconomicReview, 92(2), 463-472.Harrison, S.D. (2003). A business simulation approach to activity based costingmethod in the classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(3), 307-312.Hazlett, D. (2006). Using classroom experiments to teach economics. In W.E. Becker,M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives tochalk and talk (pp. 21-38). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational ResearchReview 1(2006), 69-82.Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computernetworks. Norwood, NJ USA: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Holter, N.C. (1994). Team assignment can be effective cooperative learningtechniques. Journal of Business for Education, 69, 73-76.Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara (2003, Januari). Ilmu dan latihan teraskecemerlangan perkhidmatan awam. Teks ucapan Pengarah INTAN diPerhimpunan Bulanan JPA, Malaysia.Inter-Agency Commission (1990). World declaration on education for all. Worldconference on education for all: Meeting basic learning needs. New York:Inter-Agency Commission.Ismail Daros (1987). Faktor-faktor utama yang menyebabkan pelajar-pelajar diperingkat menengah melakukan kegiatan ponteng sekolah. Kerja IlmiahDiploma yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Jensen, E.J., & Owen, A.L. (2003). Appealing to good students in introductoryeconomics. Journal of Economic Education, 34(4), 299-325.Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Learning together and alone: cooperative,competitive and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns tocollege: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26-35.Johnston, C.G., James, R.H., Lye, J.N., & McDonald, I.M. (2000). An evaluation ofcollaborative problem solving for learning economics. Journal of Economics,31(1), 13-29.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (1991). Buku panduan am penilaiankendalian sekolah menengah. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2000). Sukatan pelajaran kurikulumbersepadu sekolah menengah - Ekonomi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: PusatPerkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2001). Sukatan pelajaran kurikulumbersepadu sekolah rendah - Kajian Tempatan. Kuala Lumpur: PusatPerkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2005). Amalan terbaik pembelajaran aktifdalam Ekonomi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2006). Laporan kajian rintis buku panduanpembelajaran aktif dalam Ekonomi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat PerkembanganKurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2010). Analisis keputusan peperiksaan SPM2000-2009. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.Kensworthy, L.S. (1962). Guide to social studies teaching. New York: Woodsworth.Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Foundation of behavioural research. (3rd ed.). New York:Rine Hart & Winston.Khoo, Y. Y. (2008). Keberkesanan kaedah penyelesaian masalah secara kolaboratifdalam kalangan pelajar Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam. Tesis PhD yang tidakditerbitkan. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A.W. Chickering(Ed.) The Modern American College (pp. 232-255). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learnig anddevelopment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development:Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning andInstruction, 12, 383-409.Kurfiss, J.G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, pratice and possibilities.ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington, DC: Associationfor the Study of Higher Education.Kwan, V. N. (1989). Pencapaian murid-murid aliran sastera dalam mata pelajaranRampaian Sains: Satu kajian sekolah di Seremban. Tesis Sarjana yang tidakditerbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1999). Promoting active learning using theresults of Physics education research. UniServe Science News, 13-20.Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif.Shah Alam: Mc Graw-Hill (Malaysia).Lockheed, M., & Levin, H. (1991). Creating effective schools. In H. Levin & M.Lockheed (Eds.) Effective schools in developing countries (pp. 1-20).Washington, DC: The World Bank, Education and Employment Division,Population and Human Resources Department.Lundwall, B. (2000). Towards a learning society. Innovation and competence buildingwith social cohesion for Europe. The Seminar On Socio-Economic Researchand European Policy. Lisbon.Maier, M.H., & Keenan, D. (1994). Cooperative learning in economics. EconomicInquiry, 32 (April), 358-361.Manning, L.A., & Riordan, C.A. (2000). Using groupware software to supportcollaborative learning in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 31(3),244-252.Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Litton EducationalPublishing.Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Md. Yusoff Mohamed (1998). Persepsi pelajar tingkatan empat sekolah menengahkebangsaan Munshi Abdullah Kulai terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaranEkonomi Asas. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.Mergendoller J.R, Maxwell, N.L., & Bellisimo Y. (2002). The effectiveness ofproblem based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods andstudent characteristics. Human Investment Research and Education (HIRE)Center: California State University.Meyers, C., & Jones, T.B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for thecollege classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondaryschool mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436.Mohamad Zakaria (1997). Persepsi pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran Ekonomi.Kajian di sekolah menengah daerah Bachok, Kelantan. Tesis Sarjana yangtidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Mohd Majid Konting (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd Yahya Mohamed Ariffin (2001). Bidang ekonomi: Pelbagai sektor tawarpekerjaan. Diperoleh pada Oktober 10, 2008, daripadahttp://www.tutor.com/my/tutor/dunia.Mok, S. S. (2005). Nota ulangkaji dan latihan PTK: Kompetensi khusus/ fungsi.Puchong: Multimedia-ES Resources Sdn. Bhd.Mook, D. G. (1986). Motivation: The organization of action. New York: Norton.Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitativeapproaches (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Niemi, H. (1997). Active learning by teachers. In D. Stern & G.L. Huber (Eds.) Activelearning for students and teachers. Reports from eight countries (pp. 174-182).OECD. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning - a cultural change needed in teacher education andschools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 763-780.Nor Azian Ahmad (2008). Kaedah pembelajaran dan pengajaran koperatif bagi tajukIkatan Kovalen Tingkatan Empat. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan.Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Oliver, P. (Ed.). (1999). Monitoring change in education. Lifelong and continuingeducation. What is a learning society. Aldershot: Ashgate, Arena.Omar Hassan (1975). An investigation into factors effecting science interest ofsecondary school students. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 23, 255-268.Othman Lebar (2007). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod.Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Paul, R.B., & David, M.B. (1999). Method of effective teaching. Needham Heights,MA: Ally & Bacon.Piaget, J. (1969). Science of education and the psychology of the child. London:Longman.Pintrich, R.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 82, 33-40.Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal ofEngineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.Ramlee Ismail (2003). Pengaruh Matematik dan Ekonomi Asas sebagai prasyarat keatas pencapaian Prinsip Ekonomi di UPSI. Laporan Penyelidikan JangkaPendek. Tanjong Malim: UPSI.Raymond, F., Raymond, A., & McCrickard, M. (2008). Stuck behind the Math: Justhow helpful can one expect technology to be in the Economics classroom?International Review of Economics Education, 7(1), 62-102.Redish, E., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1997). On the effectiveness of activeengagementmicrocomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics,65(1), 45-50.Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement:Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). San Diego:Academic Press.Rosziah Salleh, Abidah A. Bakar & Rashida Abdul Raffar (2005). Keberkesananpembelajaran koperatif dalam meningkatkan penguasaan pelajar hayatterhadap isi kandungan mata pelajaran Biologi serta mempengaruhipencapaian pelajar. Dalam Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan ProgramMatrikulasi Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Johor Bahru: Kolej MatrikulasiMelaka.Roziah Hj. Md. Amin (2007). Pembangunan perisian isi rumah sebagai penggunabagi pengajaran dan pembelajaran berbantukan komputer Ekonomi AsasTingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.Ruckstad, M.G. (1992). Macroeconomic decision making in the world economy textand cases, (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Tex Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Rusell, J.D. (1974). Modular instruction. Minnepolis: Burgess Publishing Company.Salemi, M.K. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Southern EconomicJournal, 68(3), 721-731.Sarantakos, S. (1997). Social research. South Melbourne, Australia: MacMillanEducation.Sax, L.J., Astin, A., Arredondo, M., & Korn, W. (1996). The American collegeteacher: National norms for the 1995-96 HERI faculty survey. CA: HigherEducation Research Institute, University of California.Sazali Yusoff (1996). Peningkatan prestasi Matematik bagi pelajar-pelajar Tingkatan2 sekolah luar bandar: Suatu tinjauan terhadap keberkesanan pembelajarankoperatif. Seminar Kebangsaan Penilaian KBSM. Kuala Lumpur:Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A.Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 197-223). New York:Taylor Francis.Schloss, P.J., & Smith, M.A. (1999). Conducting research. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merril Prentice Hall.Schmidt, S. J. (2003). Active and cooperative learning using web-based simulations.Journal of Economic Education, 34(2), 151-167.Schumann, L., Rogers, R.P., & Reitzes, J.D. (1992). Case studies on the price effectsof horizontal mergers. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasiexperimentaldesigns for generalized causal inference. Boston, Mass.:Houghton Mifflin.Shahril Marzuki, Quek, A. H., & Chang, L. H. (1994). Ekonomi Asas strategipengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications &Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Siegfried, J.J., Bartlett, R., Hansen, W.L., Kelley, A.C., McClosky, D.N., &Tietenberg, T.H. (1991). The status and prospects of the economics major.Journal of Economic Education, 22(3), 195-224.Silberman, M.L. (2004). Pembelajaran Aktif: 101 Strategi untuk mengajar apa juasubjek (Zainab Ahmad, Terjemah). Kuala Lumpur: Institut TerjemahanNegara Malaysia Berhad. (Karya asli diterbitkan 1996).Simon, P.R.J. (1997). Definitions and theories of active learning. In D. Stern & G.L.Huber (Eds.) Active learning for students and teachers. Reports from eightcountries (pp. 19-39). OECD. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Siti Asiah Nor @ Moh Nor (2006). Keberkesanan kaedah permainan ke ataspencapaian, sikap dan minat pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran PrinsipPerakaunan Tingkatan IV. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi:Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Slavin, R.E. (1990). Research on co-operative learning: Consensus and controversy.Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54.Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice.Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.Slavin, R.E. (1997). Co-operative learning among students. In D. Stern & G.L. Huber(Eds.) Active learning for students and teachers. Reports from eight countries(pp. 159-173). OECD. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Slavin, R.E., & Hansell, S. (1983). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations:Contact theory in the classroom. In J.L., Epstein & N., Karweit (Ed.) Friend inschool: Pattern of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 93-114).New York: Academic Press.Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (3rd ed.). Boston:Allyn & Bacon.Strow, B.K., & Strow, C.W. (2006). A rent-seeking experiment for the classroom.Journal of Economic Education, 37 (3), 323-330.Subahan Mohd Merah (1997). Strategi pengajaran untuk meningkatkan prestasi Sainsdan Matematik. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains danMatematik. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Suhaida Abdul Kadir (2002). Perbandingan pembelajaran koperatif dan tradisionalterhadap prestasi, atribusi pencapaian, konsep kendiri akademik danhubungan sosial dalam pendidikan Perakaunan. Tesis PhD yang tidakditerbitkan. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Syarifah Alwiah Alsagoff (1986). Ilmu pendidikan pedagogi. Kuala Lumpur:Heineman Asia.Thorndike, E. (1913). Educational psychology: The psychology of learning. NewYork: Teachers College Press.Toh, W. S. (2008). Pedagogi pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaranEkonomi ke arah membangunkan modal insan. Seminar Inovasi PedagogiIPBL 2008 (pp. 117-129). Kuching, Sarawak: Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang.Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers?Approaches to teaching and students? Approaches to learning. HigherEducation, 39, 57-70.Ueckert, C.W., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2008). Active learning strategies. ScienceTeacher, 75(9), 47-52.UNESCO (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all: Meeting ourcollective commitments. World Education Forum. Dakar, Senegal: UNESCOPublishing.UNESCO (2008). EFA global monitoring report, 2008: Education for all by 2015.Will we make it? Oxford University Press & UNESCO Publishing.USAID (2005). Education strategy: improving lives through learning. Washington,DC: USAID.Velenchik, A.D. (1995). The case method as a strategy for teaching policy analysis toundergraduates. Jounal of Economic Education, 26 (Winter), 29-38.White Paper on Education and Training (1995). Brussels: Commission of theEuropean Communities.Whiting, C. (2006). Data-based active learning in the principles of Macroeconomicscourse: A mock FOMC meeting. Journal Economics of Education, 37(2), 171-177.Wollman (1969). Dictionary of behaviour science. New York: Reinhold.Zaharatul Laili Abdul Rahim & Ramlee Mustapha (2007). Pembelajaran berasaskanmasalah bagi subjek elektronik: Satu kajian tindakan di sekolah teknik.Seminar Pendidikan Kejuruteraan dan Alam Bina (pp. 230-251). Bangi:Penerbitan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Similar Items