Keberkesanan tiga kaedah mengulangkaji terhadap pencapaian markah Fizik pelajar tingkatan lima (IR)

The purpose of this research is to identify the most effective revision method to students achievement in Physics and to determine students perceptions towards the revision methods being studied. During the research, three group of students revised Force and Pressure, a topic of Form Four Physics sy...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
主要作者: Raja Sarimah Raja Alias
格式: thesis
语言:zsm
出版: 2009
主题:
在线阅读:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=417
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:The purpose of this research is to identify the most effective revision method to students achievement in Physics and to determine students perceptions towards the revision methods being studied. During the research, three group of students revised Force and Pressure, a topic of Form Four Physics syllabus using three revision method modules. The three modules were Traditional Module Revision Method (KT), Self-Study Module Revision Method (KK) and Workshop Module Revision Method (KB) representing the traditional revision method, self study revision method and workshop revision method respectively. A total of 120 students from 165 of Form Five students from Sekolah Berasrama Penuh Integrasi Rawang were the participants and were chosen using purposeful sampling. The participants were randomly divided into three groups for each revision method module being researched. This research is an experimental research with Pre-post Test Treatment and Control Group Experimental Design. The instruments used were the Students Perception Questionnaire and pre-post test for Physics topic. The questionnaire and pre-post tests were piloted and found to be highly reliable with the value of Crombach alpha for questionnaire is 0.902. The result of this research showed that there was a significant difference between the means score of pre-test and post-test for all the three revision methods. This meant that the modules have an effect towards students achievement in Physic. The result also showed that the Workshop Module Revision Method (KB) was the most effective module and the weak students from Group KB showed a significant improvement in their achievement. At the same time, Group KB showed a positive perception towards the Workshop Module Revision Method (KB)