Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21

Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan modul pembelajaran berasaskan projek yangdiintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (Modul PRO-STEM) dalamtopik Biodiversiti dan Ekosistem serta mengkaji kesannya terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi(KBAT) dan kemahiran abad k...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nurul Huda Kasim
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2019
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5021
Tags: Add Tag
modul 1
pembinaan 1
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5021
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Nurul Huda Kasim
Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan modul pembelajaran berasaskan projek yangdiintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (Modul PRO-STEM) dalamtopik Biodiversiti dan Ekosistem serta mengkaji kesannya terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi(KBAT) dan kemahiran abad ke-21. Kajian ini menggunakan kajian reka kuasi eksperimen bagi menilaikeberkesanan modul. Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM adalah berpandukan Model Pembangunan Modul Sidek.Modul PRO-STEM yang dibangunkan mempunyai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang baik dengan indekskebolehpercayaan alfa Cronbach sebanyak 0.92. Kajian keberkesanan modul terhadap KBAT dan kemahiranabad ke-21 dijalankan di sebuah sekolah menengah di daerah Batang Padang, Perak. Sampel kajianmelibatkan seramai 63 orang murid yang dipilih secara rawak kelompok, 33 daripadanya dalam kumpulanrawatan manakala lagi 30 orang murid berada dalam kumpulan kawalan. Kumpulan rawatan menjalaniproses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) dengan menggunakan Modul PRO-STEM manakala kumpulankawalan pula menjalani PdP secara konvensional selama tujuh minggu. Ujian pra dan pasca KBAT sertakemahiran abad ke-21 ditadbirkan kepada kedua-dua kumpulan rawatan dan kawalan. Keputusan analisisujian-t sampel bebas mendapati tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dari segi skor min ujian pra KBATantara kumpulan kawalan dengan kumpulan rawatan (t(61)=-1.44, p=0.89). Walaubagaimanapun, keputusananalisis ujian-t sampel untuk ujian pasca KBAT menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antarakumpulan rawatan dengan kumpulan kawalan [t(61)=-2.61, p=0.01]. Ujian-t sampel bebas bagi ujian prakemahiran abad ke-21 menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan kawalan dengankumpulan rawatan (t(61)=0.78, p=0.44), manakala bagi ujian pasca kemahiran abad ke-21, kumpulanrawatan menunjukkan peningkatan yang lebih baik berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (t(61)=-6.00,p=0.00). Kesimpulannya, penggunaan Modul PRO-STEM dalam PdP dapat meningkatkan KBAT dan kemahiranabad ke-21 dalam kalangan murid dengan signifikan. Implikasinya, pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskanprojek yang disepadukan dengan konsep STEM boleh digunakan sebagai salah satu pendekatan PdP bagimeningkatkan lagi kefahaman murid dalam mata pelajaran Sains.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nurul Huda Kasim
author_facet Nurul Huda Kasim
author_sort Nurul Huda Kasim
title Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
title_short Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
title_full Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
title_fullStr Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21
title_sort pembangunan modul pro-stem bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap kbat dan kemahiran abad ke-21
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2019
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5021
_version_ 1747833159159906304
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:50212020-07-17 Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21 2019 Nurul Huda Kasim LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan modul pembelajaran berasaskan projek yangdiintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (Modul PRO-STEM) dalamtopik Biodiversiti dan Ekosistem serta mengkaji kesannya terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi(KBAT) dan kemahiran abad ke-21. Kajian ini menggunakan kajian reka kuasi eksperimen bagi menilaikeberkesanan modul. Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM adalah berpandukan Model Pembangunan Modul Sidek.Modul PRO-STEM yang dibangunkan mempunyai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang baik dengan indekskebolehpercayaan alfa Cronbach sebanyak 0.92. Kajian keberkesanan modul terhadap KBAT dan kemahiranabad ke-21 dijalankan di sebuah sekolah menengah di daerah Batang Padang, Perak. Sampel kajianmelibatkan seramai 63 orang murid yang dipilih secara rawak kelompok, 33 daripadanya dalam kumpulanrawatan manakala lagi 30 orang murid berada dalam kumpulan kawalan. Kumpulan rawatan menjalaniproses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) dengan menggunakan Modul PRO-STEM manakala kumpulankawalan pula menjalani PdP secara konvensional selama tujuh minggu. Ujian pra dan pasca KBAT sertakemahiran abad ke-21 ditadbirkan kepada kedua-dua kumpulan rawatan dan kawalan. Keputusan analisisujian-t sampel bebas mendapati tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dari segi skor min ujian pra KBATantara kumpulan kawalan dengan kumpulan rawatan (t(61)=-1.44, p=0.89). Walaubagaimanapun, keputusananalisis ujian-t sampel untuk ujian pasca KBAT menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antarakumpulan rawatan dengan kumpulan kawalan [t(61)=-2.61, p=0.01]. Ujian-t sampel bebas bagi ujian prakemahiran abad ke-21 menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan kawalan dengankumpulan rawatan (t(61)=0.78, p=0.44), manakala bagi ujian pasca kemahiran abad ke-21, kumpulanrawatan menunjukkan peningkatan yang lebih baik berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (t(61)=-6.00,p=0.00). Kesimpulannya, penggunaan Modul PRO-STEM dalam PdP dapat meningkatkan KBAT dan kemahiranabad ke-21 dalam kalangan murid dengan signifikan. Implikasinya, pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskanprojek yang disepadukan dengan konsep STEM boleh digunakan sebagai salah satu pendekatan PdP bagimeningkatkan lagi kefahaman murid dalam mata pelajaran Sains. 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5021 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5021 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Ahmad Zamri Khairani. (2017). Assessing urban and rural teachers’ competencies inSTEM integrated education in Malaysia. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 87,p. 04004). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20178704004Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Jameyah Sheriff, & Noriah Mohd Ishak.(2015). Laporan STEM untuk Permata Negara, Kurikulum Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak 2015. TanjungMalim.Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching Thinking Skills in Context- BasedLearning: Teachers’ Challenges and Assessment Knowledge. Journal of Science Education andTechnology, 21(2), 207-225. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7Azian T. S. Abdullah, Muhammad Zaini Mohd Zain, Nair, S. G., Rusliza Abdullah, & Ihsan Ismail.(2016). PISA: Malaysia’s wake up call for a more balanced approach to educational delivery andattainment. In What can PISA 2012 data tell Us? (pp. 1- 15). Singapore: Sense Publisher.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014a). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran - Sains TahunEnam. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014b). Elemen KBAT dalam pentaksiran.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014c). Elemen KBAT dalam Sumber.Putrajaya: KemeneterianPendidikan MalaysiaBahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014d). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Aplikasi diSekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan MalaysiaBahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016a). Buku penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah(KSSM). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskaninkuiri. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016c). Sharing Malaysian experience in participation of girlsin STEM education. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCOInternational Bureau of Education (IBE).Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017a). Manual pelaksanaan pentaksiran sekolah.Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017b). Pentaksiran kompetensi dan literasi Sains, Matematik danBacaan I ( PKLSMB I ): Laporan awal. In Simposium TIMSS dan PISA 2017. Petaling Jaya.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi, Engineering danMatematik (BSTEM), BSTEM Biologi. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016a). Laporan Kebangsaan PISA 2015.Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016b). PISA 2015: PISA (Programme forInternational Student Assessment). Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2017). Jerayawara Inisiatif PerkukuhanSTEM 2017; Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Sains Teknologi Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM). Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet thechallenge. Routledge. New York: Taylor & Francis. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809921Barak, M. (2013). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solvingtaxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), 316-333. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2012-0020Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., & Mesutoglu, C. (2016). Moving STEM Beyond Schools: Students’Perceptions About an Out-of-School STEM Education Program. International Journal of Education inMathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1),9. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The ClearingHouse: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39- 43. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert Teachers: Their Characteristics, Development and Accomplishments.De La Teoria? A l’aula: Formacio Del Professorat Ensenyament de Las Ciències Socials., 13-28.Bernama. (2017). Revolusi industri 4.0 mampu wujudkan 1.5 juta pekerjaan. MalaysianDigest. Shah Alam.Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (2015). Inquiry-based learning for science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM) programs: a conceptual and practical resource for educators.Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learningg, 5, 3-19. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/doi:10.1108/S2055-364120150000004001Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10),873. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873Borden, L. L., & Wiseman, D. (2016). Considerations From Places Where Indigenous and Western Waysof Knowing, Being, and Doing Circulate Together: STEM as Artifact of Teaching and Learning.Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 140-152. Dicapai pada.https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166292Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.Virginia USA: ASCD.Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitivescience and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2),331-340. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4Cabe Trundle, K., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guidedinquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research inScience Education, 40(3), 451-478. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9129-xCapraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning; An integratedScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam, TheNetherlands: Sense Publisher.Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEMproject-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach.In STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) approach (pp. 1-6).Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogenproduction technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172-14179. Dicapaipada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045Cheng, C., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decisiontheory.pdf, 142, 174-186.Chin, W. (2014). The Effects of Project-Based Learning in High School Geometry.Thesis. Department of Education.University of Hawai'i.Chua, Y. P. (2006a). Asas statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. ShahAlam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.Chua, Y. P. (2006b). Kaedah penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. The ArithmeticTeacher, 38(1), 34-35. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00715.xCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.Professional Development in Education (Vol. 38). Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130Costa, A. L. (1991). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. (Arthur,Ed.) (Vol. 1). Virginia USA.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research (4th ed, Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed MethodsApproaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methodsapproaches. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2Daly, J. C., & Cohen, J. (1978). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,Revised Edition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 680.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.2307/2286629Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2016). 2020 Vision: Envisioning a new generation ofSTEM learning research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 1-10.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9713-5Donnelly, R., Fitzmaurice, M., & Centre, T. (2005). Designing Modules for Learning.Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, 99-110.Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. EducationResearch and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123.Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban HighSchool Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- andDesign-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology,23(1), 116-137. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5Edy Hafizan, Mohd Shahali, Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., & Kamisah, O. (2013).Bitara-Stem Tm Training of Trainers’ Programme: Impact on Trainers’ Knowledge, Beliefs , Attitudes and Efficacy Towards Integrated Stem Teaching. Journal of Baltic ScienceEducation, 14(1), 85-96.Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd AfendiZulkifeli. (2016). STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students’Interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Journal ofMathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667aFan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students inengineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1),107-129. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328- xFaridah Musa, Norlaila Mufti, Rozmel Abdul Latiff, & Maryam Mohamed Amin. (2012).Project-based Learning (PjBL): Inculcating Soft Skills in 21st Century Workplace. Procedia - Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 59(2006), 565-573. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2016). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis dataSPSS (Cetakan Ke). Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.Fazilah Razali, Othman Talib, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, & Siti Aishah Hassan. (2017).A Measure of Students Motivation , Attitude and Parental Influence towards Interest in STEM Careeramong Malaysian Form Four Science Stream Student. International Journal of Academic Research inBusiness and Social Sciences, 7(2016), 245-264. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3665Francine, E., José, B., & Maldonado, C. (2011). IMA - CID: an integrated modeling approach fordeveloping educational modules, 207-239. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-011-0043-5Gallagher, M. A. (2004). A constructivist approach to integrating science , technology , andengineering into preservice teacher education. Iowa State University.Gallant, D. J. (2007). Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) Education.Ohio: Ohio State University.Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan: Amalan dananalisis tindakan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit UniversitiMalaya.Glasersfeld, E. von. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. Constructivism inEducation, 3-16.Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases andrecommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, (1),83.Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2017). Transformation: Constructivism, Design, Thinking andElementary Steam. Art Education, 69(6), 36-43. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration inMiddle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes. Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, 25(4), 550-560. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-xHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate DataAnalysis(7th Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, andLow Achievers Differently: the Impact of Student Factors on Achievement.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0Han, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). How science, technology, engineering,and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U.S.Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157-166. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045Han, S., Roslinda Rosli, Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of Science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) onstudents’ Achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish ScienceEducation, 13(Specialissue). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10168aHan, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journalof Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306aHarris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., D’Angelo, C. M., DeBarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P.,Kennedy, C. A,Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Impact of project-based curriculum materialson student learning in science: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1362-1385. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263Hazura Mohamed, Hairulliza Mohamad Judi, Siti Fadzilah M. Noor, & ZawiyahM.Yusof. (2012). Jurang digital dan pendidikan di luar bandar : Tahap literasiteknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar. Asia-Pacific Journal of InformationTechnology and Multimedia, 1(2), 1-13.Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affectsthe classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 1-13.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-yJack, B. M., & Lin, H. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to thescience classroom. Studies in Science Education, 7267(April), 1-28. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (2ndEd). California: Thomson Higher Education.Jackson, S. L. (2011). Research methods : A modular approach (2nd Ed). California:Cengage Learning.Jamalludin Harun, & Siti Nurulwahida Mohd Zainul Abidin. (2010). Pembangunanmodul pembelajaran berbantukan video interaktif bagi pembelajaranpengaturcaraan visual basic berdasarkan pendekatan projek.Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284-301. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology,Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999-2013: AMalaysian Perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & TechnologyEducation, 10(3), 155-163. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072aJensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching tothe test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encouragegreater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307-329.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning andDevelopment: A Vygotskyian Framework. Educational Psychologist. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_4Jones, G., Dana, T., LaFramenta, J., Adams, T. L., & Arnold, J. D. (2016). STEM TIPS:Supporting the beginning secondary STEM teacher. TechTrends, 60(3), 272-288.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0052-5Jones, H., & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. NewYork: MacMillan. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)02000-FJuan, J., Jr, R., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). The effectiveness of project - based learning (EggDrop Project) towards students’ real world connection in learning Physics.International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(8), 1-6.Kamisah Osman, Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2010).Development and validation of the Malaysian 21st century skills instrument (M-21CSI) for science students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599-603.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.204Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEMeducation. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-zKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025.Education, 27(1), 1-268. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015a). Buletin Anjakan. Buletin TransformasiPendidikan Malaysia - PPPM 2013-2025, Bil 5/2015.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015b). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) danPerlaksanaan KBAT di Sekolah. Buletin Anjakan. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015c). Laporan Tahunan 2015 PelanPembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Vol. XXXIII). Putrajaya.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015d). Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 : Amalan DanPelaksanaan Di Sekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015e). Pengenalan Kepada Pisa 2015. Putajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Laporan TIMSS 2015. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi,kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017a). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah MenengahSains Tingkatan Dua: Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017b). Pendidikan STEM di Sekolah.Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi,Engineering dan Matematik (BSTEM). Putrajaya: Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.Kim, Y., Hye-Eun, C., & Lim, G. (2015). Science curriculum changes and STEMEducation in East Asia. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science Education in East Asia (pp.1-629). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1Koay, S. S., & Maria Salih. (2016). Miskonsepsi Murid Terhadap Sains Dalam Item-itemTIMSS. Penang, Malaysia: Publication Unit SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang Malaysia.Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6thGrade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and AttitudesToward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66-78. Dicapaipada https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. New AgeInternational (P) Ltd. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). CHAPTER 19 PBL Kraichik. In R. K. S. (ed).(Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge UniversityPress.Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school.A project-based approach (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky ’s developmental and educational psychology (FirstEdit). New York: Psychology Press.Laur, D. (2013). Authentic learning experiences, A real-world approach to Project-BasedLearning. New York: Routledge.Lay, A., & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Developing 21 st century skills through aConstructivist-Constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2),205-216.Lee, C. H., (2015). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM dalam pemupukankemahiran abad ke-21 dan peningkatan pencapaian bagi topik Nutrisi.Thesis.Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2014). Development and validation of the BTEM Moduleto enhance 21st century skills. In R. P. Devadason, Zurida Ismail, & K. T. Ng (Eds.),Empowering the future generation through science education (pp. 34-45). Penang,Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2015). An interdisciplinary approach for Biology,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (BTEM) to enhance 21st century skillsin Malaysia. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 137-147.Lee, S., Kang, E., & Kim, H.-B. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Students’ LearningApproach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation. Journal ofScience Education and Technology, 24(3-Feb), 234-255. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9509-5Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi.Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Seidel, R. A., & Slavit, D. (2015). Supporting middle schoolteachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. In NARST 2015 AnnualInternational Conference (Vol. 116, pp. 177-188). Chicago, Illinois. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2017). Jumping on the STEM bandwagon: Howmiddle grades students and teachers can benefit from STEM experiences. MiddleSchool Journal, 48(3), 15-24. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297663Li, T. K., Yahaya, R., Supardy, N., & Hassan, H. A. (2014). Developing Higher LevelQuestioning on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy before Using an Inquiry-Based ScienceApproach. In D. R. Peter, Z. Ismail, & N. K. Thoe (Eds.), Empowering the futuregeneration through science education. Penang, Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.Lombardi, M. M. (2016). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An OverviewAuthentic Learning for the 21st Century : Educase Learning Initiatives.Lou, S., Chuang, S.-Y., Meng, H., Yeh, R. C., Tseng, K.-H., & Chang, C.-C. (2010). Astudy of project-based STEM learning for senior high school students in Taiwan. InAmerican Society for Engineering Education. Kentucky.Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technologyand Design Education, 21(2), 161-183. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9112-xLynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. NursingResearch. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association ofeducational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. ScienceEducation, 95(5), 877-907. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441Mazlini Adnan, Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Noriah Ishak, &Jameyah Sherrif. (2016). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia diperingkat kanak- kanak : Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasianpendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. GEOGRAFIA OnlineMalaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(1), 29-36.Miettnen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey ’s theory ofreflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1),54-72. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higherorderthinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education,37(4), 353-369. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2016). Using STEM integratedapproach to nurture students’ interest and 21st century skills. The EurasiaProceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 313-319.Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, Zanaton Ikhsan, Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahili, &Raifana Rosa. (2015). Impact Studies of Integrated STEM Program. InternationalJournal of Technical Research and Applications, 35(35), 1-5.Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah Mat Noh, &Ahmad Ariffin Sapar. (2017). Pengenalan asas kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalampenyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan (2nd editio). Bangi: Minda IntelekAgency.Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, & Mohd Faizal NizamLee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen “Anda danKepenggunaan.” Tanjung Malim: Emeritus PublicationsMohd Yazid Mohd Shariff. (2013). Keberkesanan penggunaan perisian Google Sketch-Up terhadap peningkatan pencapaian dan minat pelajar dalam subtopik LukisanOrtografik Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2013).Moore, T. J., Hynes, M. M., Purzer, ., Glancy, A. W., Siverling, E. A., Tank, K. M.,Guzey, S. S. (2015). STEM integration: Evidence of student learning in designbasedcurricula. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015-Febru(February). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044216Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016). PreparingStudents for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities. Journal ofScience Education and Technology. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9643-3MOSTI. (2016). Dasar Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi Negara: Putrajaya: KementerianSains,Teknologi dan Inovasi Malaysia.Muhammad Syukri, Soewarno, S., Lilia Halim, & Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2018). Theimpact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 66-75.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. D. Avison & J.Pries-Heje. London: Sage Publications.Murray, E. C. (2011). Implementing Higher-Order Thinking in Middle SchoolMathematics Classrooms.Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology.Museum of Science Boston. (2008). Engineering the Future : Science, Technology, anddesign process: Teacher Guide. Engineering. California: Key Curriculum Press.National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education. Washington, D.C.:The National academy Press. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.17226/13158National Research Council. (2012). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, andschool (Expanded E). Washington D.C: National Academy Press. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-88415-752-6.50153-3New York Department of Education. (2009). Project-Based Learning: Inspiring MiddleSchool Students to Engage in Deep and Active Learning.Newhouse, C. P. (2017). STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the AustralianCurriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment. Journal ofScience Education and Technology, 26(1), 44-57. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4Newman, J. L., Dantzler, J., & Coleman, A. N. (2015). Science in Action: How MiddleSchool Students Are Changing Their World Through STEM Service-LearningProjects. Theory into Practice, 54(1), 47-54. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.977661Ng, C.H, & Mazlini Adnan. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-BasedInquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. In IOP ConferenceSeries: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 296, p. 012020). Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020Nitce Isa Medina Machmudi, & Mai Shihah Abdullah. (2013). Pembelajaran BerasaskanProjek : Takrifan , Teori dan Perbandingannya dengan Pembelajaran BerasaskanMasalah. CREAM -Current Research in Malaysia, 2(1), 181-194.Noor Haniza, & Effandi Zakaria. (2017). Penerapan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras TinggiMelalui Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah. STEd2017 : Seminar on Transdisciplinary Education, 9-17.Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). Mc-Graw HillEducation.Norazla Mustafa, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir, & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan MohamadSaid. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education.Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4288. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111Nur Fadhila Baharudin. (2016). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan Modul PBM-SC2Terhadap KBAT, Motivasi dan Refleksi Pelajar. Thesis. Universiti PendidikanSultan Idris.Nur Fadzlillah Amira Mohd Noor, Aminuddin Hassan, & Nor Aniza Ahmad. (2017).Relationship between Emotional, Intelligence, Motivation and Logical Reasoningtowards Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students. InternationalJournal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.Nur Farhana Ramli, & Othman Talib. (2017). Can Education Institution ImplementSTEM ? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of AcademicResearch in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721-732. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772Nur Suhaidah Sukor, Kamisah Osman, & Maria Abdullah. (2010). Students’ achievementof Malaysian 21st Century Skills in Chemistry. Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 9, 1256-1260. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.316Nurashikin Muzafar. (2015). Pembinaan Modul Bio Three dan kesannya terhadappenguasaan konsep serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi murid tingkatan empat.Thesis. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Nyet, Moi Siew, Nazir Amir, & Chin, L. C. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service andin-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1-20. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8Nyet Moi Siew, Goh, H., & Fauziah Sulaiman. (2016). Integrating STEM in anengineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary schoolstudents in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education,15(4), 477-493.O’loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivismtoward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 29(8), 791-820. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290805OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tacklingreal-life problems (Vol. V). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-enOlusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching andLearning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320-7388. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670Othman Talib. (2017). SPSS: Analisis data kuantitatif untuk penyelidik muda (CetakanKe). Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Padua Souza, C., Dos Santos, F. T.,Mendoza Lopez, R. V., & Ribeiro Paiva, S. B. (2014). A critical analysis of testretestreliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliativecare: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 8. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-8Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEMhigh school design: 10 critical components. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 64-71.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator ofContent Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health,30(4), 459-467. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/nurRagsdale, S. (2014). Project-based Learning as a Means for Meeting the Needs of 21stCentury Students in Common Core States. Lindewood University.Rajendran, N. . (2017). Pengajaran dan penguasaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi:Teori dan amalan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit UPSI.Ramlan Mustapha, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalampenyelidikan sains sosial (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Richey, R. ., & Klein, J. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledgefrom instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in HigherEducation, 16(2), 23-38. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2014). STEM and technology education: international state-ofthe-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429-451.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-zRohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil, & Mohammad Zohir Ahmad. (2017). Model BersepaduPenerapan Kemahiran Abad ke-21 dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. JurnalPendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 1-11.Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2015). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21stcenturyteaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(October 2012), 8-13. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203Saavendra, A. R., & Opfer, V. darleen. (2014). Learning 21st Century-skills Requires21st century Teaching, 94(1), 41-44.Sahin, A. (2015). A practice based model for STEM Teaching (1st ed.). Houstan, USA:Sense Publisher.STEM Students on the Stage ( SOS ): Promoting Student Voice and Choice in STEMEducation Through an Interdisciplinary , Standards-focused , Project BasedLearning Approach. Journal of STEM Education, (September), 24-34.Sanders, M. (2012). Integrative Stem Education As “ Best Practice .” In 7th BiennialInternational Technology Education Research Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1-15).Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and Validation of aquestionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, andclinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidencedbasedclinical practice. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice,11(2), 1-12.Sazilah Sam, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2017). Development and evaluationof form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. InAIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847). Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983895Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan; falsafah, teori dan praktis.Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul, bagaimana membinamodul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti PutraMalaysia.Singh, S., & Yaduvanshi, S. (2015). Constructivism in Science Classroom : Why andHow. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1-5.Sivertsen, M. L., Riley, R. W., & Robinson, S. P. (1993). State of the art transformingideas and learning. A guide for elementary science education. Washington D.C: USDepartment of Education.Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning. STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) approach. Texas: Sense Publisher. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K., Douglas, A., & Love, M. L. (2015). Engaging youngengineers teaching problem solving through STEM. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul HBrookes Publishing Co. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.16.00054Stozhko, N., Bortnik, B., Mironova, L., Tchernysheva, A., & Podshivalova, E. (2015).Interdisciplinary project-based learning: Technology for improving studentcognition. Research in Learning Technology, 23(July). Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.27577Sukiman Saad, Noor Shah Saad, & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2014). Pengajaran KemahiranBerfikir: Persepsi Dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia,2(1), 18-36.Taber, K. S. (2017). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and ReportingResearch Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 1-24.Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysianapproaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development,45, 42-53. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA:Autodesk Foundation., 13(415), 2003. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0302-xThys, M., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & Laevers, F. (2016). Investigating thequality of project-based science and technology learning environments inelementary school: a critical review of instruments. Studies in Science Education,52(1), 1-27. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1078575Tsai, H. Y., Chung, C. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Construction and development of iSTEMlearning model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and TechnologyEducation, 14(1), 15-32. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78019Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning(PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,23(1), 87-102. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-xTuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Kamisah Osman, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2012). M-21CSI : A validated 21 st century skills instrument for secondary science students.Asian Social Science, 8(16), 38-44. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p38Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, & Kamisah Osman. (2010). Therelationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towardsphysics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 546-554. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073Turiman, P., Jizah Omar, Adzliana Mohd Daud, & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Fosteringthe 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills.Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253UNESCO. (2015). Malaysia National Education for All Review Report. World EducationForum, 1-128.Wan Nor Fadzilah, W. A., Nurazidawati, M. O., Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., Kamisah,O., & Zanaton, I. (2016). Fostering students ’ 21st century skills through ProjectOriented Problem Based Learning ( POPBL ) in integrated STEM educationprogram. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration :Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration. Journal of Pre-CollegeEngineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1-13. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning.Science Education, 75(1), 9-21. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750103Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology,41(1), 331-357. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659Yusri Mohamad Yusop, Melati Sumari, Fatanah Mohamed, Shahriza Said, Mohd IbrahimK.Azeez, & Jamil, M. R. M. (2015). The needs analysis in self-concept moduledevelopment. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(1), 44-55.Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., &Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study:Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165-178. Dicapai padahttps://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017Zanaton Iksan. (2007). Amalan Penyoalan Lisan Guru Kimia Dalam Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti Malaya.

Similar Items