Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji keberkesanan pengajaran menggunakan kaedah BarBulat terhadap pencapaian murid Tahun Tiga dalam Pendaraban Dua Nombor. Kajianini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen ujian pra-pasca kumpulan tidaksetara. Sejumlah 50 orang murid di sebuah sekolah rendah di kawasan neg...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5472 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5472 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Yip, Yan Yee Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| description |
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji keberkesanan pengajaran menggunakan kaedah BarBulat terhadap pencapaian murid Tahun Tiga dalam Pendaraban Dua Nombor. Kajianini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen ujian pra-pasca kumpulan tidaksetara. Sejumlah 50 orang murid di sebuah sekolah rendah di kawasan negeri Perakdipilih secara rawak untuk kajian ini. Seramai 25 orang murid daripada kumpulanrawatan menjalani proses intervensi menggunakan kaedah Bar Bulat manakala 25orang murid daripada kumpulan kawalan melalui proses pengajaran dan pembelajaranmenggunakan kaedah konvensional. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam kajian iniadalah satu set ujian pra dan pasca. Data dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif daninferensi. Berdasarkan analisis ujian-t sampel tidak bersandar, min markah ujianpencapaian pasca (min = 35.40, sp = 2.082) murid kumpulan rawatan adalah berbezadengan min markah ujian pencapaian pasca (min = 29.60, sp = 2.217) muridkumpulan kawalan secara signifikan [t(48) = 9.535, p <0.05]. Kesimpulannya, muridyang menggunakan kaedah Bar Bulat menunjukkan pencapaian yang lebih baikterhadap Pendaraban Dua Nombor berbanding murid daripada kumpulan kawalan.Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan pengajaran matematik perlu menitik beratkankefahaman konsep nilai tempat dalam algoritma pendaraban dua nombor untukmeningkatkan pencapaian murid. |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Yip, Yan Yee |
| author_facet |
Yip, Yan Yee |
| author_sort |
Yip, Yan Yee |
| title |
Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| title_short |
Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| title_full |
Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| title_fullStr |
Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| title_sort |
keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5472 |
| _version_ |
1747833199436759040 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:54722021-01-07 Keberkesanan penggunaan kaedah bar bulat terhadap pencapaian murid tahun tiga dalam topik pendaraban dua nombor 2020 Yip, Yan Yee LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji keberkesanan pengajaran menggunakan kaedah BarBulat terhadap pencapaian murid Tahun Tiga dalam Pendaraban Dua Nombor. Kajianini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen ujian pra-pasca kumpulan tidaksetara. Sejumlah 50 orang murid di sebuah sekolah rendah di kawasan negeri Perakdipilih secara rawak untuk kajian ini. Seramai 25 orang murid daripada kumpulanrawatan menjalani proses intervensi menggunakan kaedah Bar Bulat manakala 25orang murid daripada kumpulan kawalan melalui proses pengajaran dan pembelajaranmenggunakan kaedah konvensional. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam kajian iniadalah satu set ujian pra dan pasca. Data dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif daninferensi. Berdasarkan analisis ujian-t sampel tidak bersandar, min markah ujianpencapaian pasca (min = 35.40, sp = 2.082) murid kumpulan rawatan adalah berbezadengan min markah ujian pencapaian pasca (min = 29.60, sp = 2.217) muridkumpulan kawalan secara signifikan [t(48) = 9.535, p <0.05]. Kesimpulannya, muridyang menggunakan kaedah Bar Bulat menunjukkan pencapaian yang lebih baikterhadap Pendaraban Dua Nombor berbanding murid daripada kumpulan kawalan.Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan pengajaran matematik perlu menitik beratkankefahaman konsep nilai tempat dalam algoritma pendaraban dua nombor untukmeningkatkan pencapaian murid. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5472 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5472 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Alloway, T. P. (2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning inchildren with learning difficulties. European Journal of PsychologicalAssessment, 25, 9298.Amar, S. (2007). Misconceptions in numbers. Diakses daripada http://www.ugru.uaeu.ac.ae/ugrujournal/ugrujournal_files/sr5/min.pdfAndy, F. (2009). Discovering Statistic Using SPSS (Third Edit.) Singapore: SagePublicationsAnghileri, J. (2006). Teaching number sense (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Arslan & Altun (2007). Learning to solve non-routine mathematical problemsElementary Education Online, 6 (1) (2007), pp. 50-61Artine, N., Manning, J., Serr, J. & Yurkovetsky, I. (2015). Angels multiplication error,Grade 5. Diakses daripada http://achieve.lausd.net/cms/lib08/CA01000043/C e n t r i c i t y / D o m a i n / 2 4 4 /Angels%20Multiplication%20Error%2011.16.15%20Post.pdfASCD. (2011). Common Core and Mathematics: Grades K5 >Module 5 >Reading:Numbers and Operations in Base 10 and Numbers and OperationsFractions.Diakses daripada http://pdo.ascd.org/lmscourses/PD11OC129/media/CCSS_Math_K-5_M05_Reading_NBT-FractionsII.pdfBahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2013). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum danPentaksiran. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Baharudin Omar, Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin & Nordin Mamat. (2002). FaktorKecemerlangan dan Kemunduran Pelajar di Sekolah Menengah dalamMatematik: Satu Tinjauan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. InternationalAssociation for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Baek, J. M. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking through exploration inmultiplication. In C. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraicthinking in school mathematics, seventieth yearbook (pp. 141-154). Reston,VA.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Baker, S., Gersten, R. & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research onteaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary SchoolJournal, 103(1), 51-73.Ball, D., Lubienski, S. & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics:The unsolved problem of teachers mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York, NY:Macmillan.Ballew, H. & Cunningham, J. (1982). Diagnosing Strengths and Weaknesses of Sixth-Grade Students in Solving Word Problems. Journal for Research inMathematics Education, 13(3), 202-210.Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: Theintegration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In: Baroody AJ, DowkerA, editors. The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructingadaptive expertise. pp. 133.Baroody, A. J. (2006). Why children have difficulties mastering the basic numbercombinations and how to help them. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(1),22-31.Booker, G. (2011). Building numeracy. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford UniversityPress.Boonlerts, S. & Inprasitha, M. (2013). The textbook analysis on multiplication: Thecase of Japan, Singapore and Thailand. Creative Education, 4(4).Bridgett, D. J., & Cuevas, J. (2000). Effects of listening to Mozart and Bach on theperformance of a mathematical test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(3,Pt2),11711175.Brown, D. & Wheatly, G. (1997). Components of imagery and mathematicalunderstanding. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 19, no. 1: 4570.Cambourne, B.L. (2002). Literature-based/constructivist approaches to reading andlanguage arts instruction. In A.E. Farstrup and S.J. Samuels (Eds.), Whatresearch has to say about reading instruction (3rd edition). Newark, DE:International Reading Association.Campbell, J. I., Chen, Y. & Maslany, A. J. (2013). Retrieval Iinduced forgetting ofarithmetic facts across cultures. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(6),759I773.Caron, T. (2007). Learning multiplication the easy way. Clearing House, 80(6),278-282.Carpenter, T., Franke, M. & Levi L. (2005). Thinking mathematically: Integratingarithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Chong, L. V. F. (2011). Penggunaan Combo Set Dalam Membantu Murid TahunTiga Menjawab Soalan Long Division. Koleksi Artikel Penyelidikan TindakanPISMP MT amb. Januari 2008, Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan IPG KBLTahun 2011, 27-41.Chua Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan. Malaysia:McGraw-Hill.Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan. Mcgraw-Hill Education.Coles, D. & Copeland, T. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics across the primarycurriculum. London: David Fulton PublishersConnelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nurs 17(6): 4112Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodsapproaches (3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge-Falmer.De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: a perspective from research onmathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 37-46.Deliyianni, E., Monoyiou, A., Elia, I., Georgiou, C. & Zannettou, E. (2009). Pupilsvisual representations in standard and problematic problem solving inmathematics: Their role in the breach of the didactical contract. EuropeanEarly Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(1), 95-110. doi:10.1080/135029308026899079Ding, M. & Li, X. (2010). A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S.and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction,28(2), 146- 180.Dowker, A. (1998). Individual differences in normal arithmetical development. In C.Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 275302). Hove:Psychology Press.Drost, E. (2004). Validity and Realibility in Social Science Research. EducationResearch and Perspectives, 38 (1), 105 - 123.Mariam Adawiah Dzulkifli & Muhammad Faiz Mustafar. (2013). The influence ofcolour on memory performance: A review. The Malaysian Journal of MedicalSciences. 20(2),3. Diakses daripada http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=MustafarMFEffandi, Z. & Zanaton, I. (2007). Promoting cooperative learning on science andmathematics education: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal ofMathematics, Science & Technology Education , 3 (1), 3539.Effandi, Z. & Norazah, M. N. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety onmatriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. EurasiaJournal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 2730.Eom, S., Wen, J. & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students perceived learningoutcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empiricalinvestigation. Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 1-4.Ema Farina Hasme & Saemah Rahman. (2017). Kebimbangan Matematik, SikapTerhadap Fizik dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Fizik Pelajar. Seminar onTransdisiplin Education (STEd2017), 164- 172. Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.Eugenia, K. (2015). The bar model as a visual aid for developing complementary/variation problems. Diakses daripada https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01288480/documentFrykholm, J. (2018). Learning to Think Mathematically About Multiplication AResource for Teachers, A Tool for Young Children. The Math Learning Center:Oregon.Fuson, K. C. & Beckmann, S. (2012). Standard algorithms in the Common Core StateStandards. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Journal ofMathematics Education Leadership, 14 (2), 14-30Garain, D.N. & Sanjeev, K. (2018). Japanese vs Vedic Methods for Multiplication.International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT), 54(3).Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 37: 415George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guideand Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.Gerrit, S., Yumiko Ono & John, R. (2015). What Constitutes Effective MathematicsTeaching? Perceptions of Teachers. African Journal of Research inMathematics, Science and Technology Education Volume 19, 2015-Issue 3.Gresham, G. (2007). A study of mathematics anxiety in pre-service teachers. EarlyChildhood Education Journal, 35(2), 181-188.Geist, E. (2010). The Anti-Anxiety Curriculum: Combating Math anxiety in theclassroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(1), 24- 31.Hansen, A., Drews, D., Dudgeon, J., Lawton, F. & Surtees, L. (2007). Childrenserrors in Mathematics: Understanding common misconceptions in primaryschools. United States of America: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Harold, R. (2017). The area model for multiplication. Diakses daripada https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher/Blog/The-Area-Model-for-Multiplication/Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge inMathematics: An Introductory Analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual andProcedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing: In primary classrooms.California: SAGE Publications Ltd.Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L. & Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation:Teaching and decision-making (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Hutkemri. (2009). Keberkesanan strategi pemetaan informasi ke atas pengetahuankonseptual matematik pelajar sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) (Unpublishedmasters thesis). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Izsk, A. (2004). Teaching and learning two-digit multiplication: Coordinatinganalyses of classroom practices and individual student learning. MathematicalThinking & Learning, 6(1), 37-79. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0601_3Jackson, M.C., Wu, C.Y., Linden, D.E.J. & Raymond, J.E. (2009). Enhanced visualshort-term memory for angry faces. J Exp Psychol Human.35(2):363374.Kamii, C., Rummelsburg, J. & Kari, A. (2005). Teaching aritmetic to low-performing,low-SES first graders. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 39-50.Kamus Dewan Bahasa Edisi Ke-4. (2005). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah RendahMatematik Tahun Tiga: Dokumen Standard Kurikulum Dan Pentaksiran (DrafEdition). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Buku Pengoperasian Program LINUS 2.0.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Ketterlin-Geller, R. & Chard, D. J. (2011) Algebra readiness for students withlearning difficulties in grades 48: Support through the study of number.Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(1), 65-78.Kimberlin, C. L. & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurementinstruments used in research. American Journal of Health System Pharmacists,65(23), 2276-2284.Ku, P. L. & Lim, S. C. (2018) Perlaksanaan dan keberkesanan kaedah lattice dalampengajaran kemahiran matematik: satu kajian kes di sekolah rendah. OnlineJournal of TVET Practitioners, 1 (1)Kundell H. L. & Polansky, M. (2003). Measurement of observer agreement.Radiology 228:303-308Ladel, S. & Kortenkamp, U. (2016). Development of a Flexible Understanding ofPlace Value. Mathematics Education in the Early Years: Results from thePOEM2 Conference. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Lauritzen, P. (2012). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of MathematicalFunctions. Dissertations in Education, Humanities, and Theology 34. Joensuu:Publications of the University of Eastern Finland.Lay, Y. F. & Khoo, C.J. (2013). Pengenalan kepada Pendekatan Kuantitatif dalamPenyelidikan Pendidikan. Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Lee, J. E. (2014). Deciphering multiplication algorithms using the area model.Mathematics teaching in the middle school (19), 556-563.Mageswari, K., Zurida Ismail & Norita Mohamed (2007). Reorientasi kurikulumkimia KBSM ke arah kurikulum lestari. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Isu-isuPendidikan Negara ke-3: Dasar dan Pelaksanaan.Maher, N. & Muir, T. (2013). I know you have to put down a zero, but im not surewhy: Exploring the link between pre-service teachers content and pedagogicalcontent knowledge. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15(1),72-87.Mathematics Navigator (2016). Misconceptions and errors. Diakses daripada http://www.westada.org/cms/lib8/ID01904074/Centricity/Domain/207/Misconceptions_Error%202.pdfMeacham, M. (2015). Using color psychology to build effective training curriculum.Diakses daripada http://www.ttcinnovations.com/using-color-psychology-tobuild-effective-training-curriculum/McInerney, D.M. & McInerney, V. (1998). Educational psychology: Constructinglearning (2nd ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall.McInerney, D.M. & McInerney, V. (2002). Educational psychology: Constructinglearning (3rd ed.). Sydney: Prentice Hall.McInerney, D.M. & McInerney, V. (2006). Educational psychology: Constructinglearning (4th ed.). Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.Miller, S. P. & Hudson, P. J. (2007). Using Evidence-Based Practices to BuildMathematics Competence Related to Conceptual, Procedural, and DeclarativeKnowledge. Learning Disabilities Practice, 22(1), 47-57.Mohamed Amin Embi. (2015). Kepelbagaian pelajar dan perbezaan pembelajaran.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd. Uzi Dollah. (2000). Penyelesaian masalah matematik: satu kajian kes pelajartingkatan 2. Tesis M.Ed., Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.Norton, A. & Boyce, S. (2015). Provoking the construction of a structure forcoordinating n+1 levels of units. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40,211-232.Mulligan, J. & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in earlymathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2),33I49.Mullis, V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 internationalresults in mathematics. Boston: International Study Center.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards forschool mathematics. National Council of Teachers of MathematicsNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2012). Standards for grades 3- 5.Diakses daripada http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=24600#3-5National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief StateSchool Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for Mathematics.Washington, DC: Authors.National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The finalreport of the national mathematics advisory panel.: Washington, DC: USDepartment of Education.National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Reports of the task groups andsubcommittees. Washington, DC: Author.Ngan, J. I. (2011). Penggunaan Kaedah Jari Dalam Penguasaan Kemahiran PenolakanFakta Asas Murid Tahun Dua. Koleksi Artikel Penyelidikan Tindakan PISMPMT amb. Januari 2008, Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan IPG KBL Tahun 2011,123-136.Nickson, M. (2000). Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Teacher's Guide toRecent Research. CassellNoraini Aziz. (2014). Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis Pelajar Matematik TambahanSekolah Menengah (Critical Thinking Skills of Additional MathematicsSecondary School Students). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(2), 31-49.Norasmah, O. & Hariyaty Ab Wahid. (2006). Ciri-ciri keusahawanan dan gayapemikiran. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 16, 160.Norasmah, O. & Shuki, O. (2009). Kaedah pengajaran dan pembelajaran. In I.Noraini, & O. Shuki (Eds.), Pengajaran dan pembelajaran: teori dan praktis(pp. 75-100). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Nor Azian Aini, Muhammad Isa & Norabiatul Adawiah. (2002). Ke arah MelahirkanPengajaran Berkesan, Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Nur Alina Syuhada. (2010). Meningkatkan kemahiran mendarab dengan nombor duadigit secara mengumpul semula menggunakan Kaedah Lattice bagi muridtahun 4. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan PISMP (hlm. 88-92).Terengganu: Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Dato Razali Ismail.Nur Aniza Elias & Roslinda Rosli. (2016). Meningkatkan penguasaan murid dalamoperasi darab. International Seminar on Generating Knowledge ThroughResearch, UUM-UMSIDA, 25-27 October 2016, Universiti Utara Malaysia,Malaysia.O'Connell, S. & SanGiovanni, J. (2015). Mastering the basic facts in multiplicationand division. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan &Statistik (Cetakan Pe.).Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Pan, Y. (2012). Attentional capture by working memory contents. Can J Exp Psychol.2012;64(2):124128.Patricia Elfina Jelawai Enggu. (2012). Penggunaan Teknik Magic Tree DalamMengajar Konsep Asas Penolakan Murid Pemulihan Tahun Dua. SeminarPenyelidikan Tindakan IPG KBL, Tahun 2012, 38-50. Diperolehi pada 16Oktober, 2016 daripada http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/BukuKoleksi/2012/PEM/5%20patricia%20elfina.pdfPeter, O. I., Abiodun, A. P. & Jonathan, O. O. (2010). Effect of constructivisminstructional approach on teaching practical skills to mechanical related tradestudents in western nigeria technical colleges, International NGO Journals, 5(3): 59-64Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025 (2013). Education, 27(1), 1268. Doi:10.1016/2010.08.007.Piaget, J. (1968). La autonomia en la escuela. (M. L. Navarro de Luzuriaja, Trans.)Buenos Aire, Argentina: Editorial Losada, S.A.Porta, M. (2008). A dictionary of Epidemiology. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rittle-Johnson, B. & Alibali, M. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge ofmathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology,91(1), 175-189.Razali, F. & Ahmad, N. (2012). Penggunaan Teknik Ziefir Dalam MeningkatkanKemahiran Menyelesaikan Soalan Darab Nombor Tiga Digit Dengan NomborDua Digit Bagi Murid Tahun 4. Penyelidikan Tindakan PISMP 2012.Ross, S. H. (1989): Parts. Wholes, and Place Value: A Developmental View. In: TheArithmetic Teacher, Vol. 36. No. 6, S. 47-51.Rutherford, K. (2015). Why play Math games? Diakses daripada http://www.nctm.org/publications/teaching-children-mathematics/blog/why-playmath-games_/Schifter, D., Bastable, V., Russell, S. J., Seyferth, L. & Riddle, M. (2008). Algebra inthe grades K-5 classroom: Learning opportunities for students and teachers. In C. E. Greenes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and algebraic thinking inschool mathematics (pp. 263-278). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers ofMathematics.Seah, T. K. R. (2004). An investigation of the depth and breadth of students'knowledge of multiplication as a basis for the development of multiplicativethinking. Unpublished M Ed. thesis, Griffith University.Selley, N. (1999). The art of constructivist teaching in primary school. London:Fulton.Selling, S. K. (2016). Learning to represent, representing to learn. Journal ofMathematical Behavior, 41, 191-209. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.003Sgroi, Laura S. (2001). Teaching elementary and middle school Mathematics, raisingthe standards. United States, Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.Sharifah, M. N., Habibah, E., Rahil, M., Rohani, A. T., Samsilah, R. & Tajularipin, S.(2006). Laporan akhir kajian ciri-ciri sekolah dan pelajar berkeperluan khasyang berkaitan dengan pencapaian peperiksaan UPSR, PMR dan SPM.Laporan yang dibiayai oleh Jabatan Pendidikan Khas Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia, Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan Universiti Putra Malaysia.Smith, C., Marchand-Martella, N. & Martella, R. (2011). Assessing the effects of theRocket Math program with a primary elementary school student at risk forschool failure: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, (34)2,247-258.Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). California: A Sage PublicationsCompany.Stickney, E. M., Sharp, L. B. & Kenyon, A. S. (2012). Technology-enhancedassessment of math fact automaticity: patterns of performance for low- andtypically achieving students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(2), 8494.Student Achievement Partners. (2015). Multi-Digit multiplication using the standardalgorithm. Diakses daripada http://achievethecore.org/content/upload/G r a d e % 2 0 5 % 2 0 M i n i - A s s e s s m e n t % 2 0 - % 2 0 M u l t i -Digit%20Multiplication%20FINAL%20BRANDED.pdfSubadrah Nair & Malar Muthiah. (2005), Penggunaan Model KonstruktivismeLima Fasa Needham Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah, Pusat Pengajian IlmuPendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.Syahida Nadia Zakaria. (2015). Kesan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dan PendekatanTradisional Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Komponen Sastera BahasaMelayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu JPBM Vol.2, Bil. 2: 12-21.Tahar M.S., Esa A., Rahim M.B., Baser, J. A., Shuib, S. & Buntat, Y. (2011).Keberkesanan Penggunaan Cd Interaktif Visualisasi Pelajar. Journal ofTechnical, Vocational & Engineering Educational, 3(9), 104115.Taylor, B. N. & Kuyatt, C. E. (1994). Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing theUncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. Washington: National Institute ofStandards and Technology.Tengku Halim Tengku Ahmad. (2008). Meningkatkan Penguasaan Murid dalamMembina Sifir, Mendarab Sebarang Nombor dengan Nombor Dua atau TigaDigit Menggunakan Kaedah Palangku. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 39(1), 36- 50.Van de Walle, J.A., Karp, K.S. & Bay Williams, J.M. (2013). Elementary and middleschool mathematics: Teaching developmentally. 8th Edition. Boston: PearsonVighnarajah, Wong, S.L. & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2008). The shift in the role ofteachers in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (2).Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning.London: Falmer Press.Wan Zah, W. A., Sharifah Kartini, S. H., Habsah, I., Ramlah, H., Mat Rofa I., MohdMajid, K., et al (2005). Kefahaman guru tentang nilai matematik. JurnalTeknologi Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 43(E) Dis. 2005: 4562.Warner R. M. (2008). Applied Statistics: From Bivariate through MultivariateTechniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageWati Susilawati, Didi Suryadi & Jarnawi A. Dahlan. (2017). The Improvement ofMathematical Spatial Visualization Ability of Student through CognitiveConflict. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 12(2):155-166Wichmann, F. A., Sharpe, L.T. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2002). The contributions ofcolor to recognition memory for natural scenes. J Exp Psychol Learn MemCogn. 28(3):509-20.Wong, M. & Evans, D. (2007). Improving basic multiplication fact recall for primaryschool students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 89I106.Willian, W. & Stephen, G.J. (2005). Research Methods in Education (Eight Edit.).Boston: Pearson.Yahaya A. H. & Savarimuthu, E. (2008). Kepentingan Kefahaman Konsep DalamMatematik, Permasalahan Dalam Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik, UTM.Tahun 2008, MS 22-33Yip, J. H. (2011). Kaedah Susunan Petak Sifir Dalam Membantu Murid Tahun TigaMenguasai Konsep Darab. Koleksi Artikel Penyelidikan Tindakan PISMP MTamb. Januari 2008, Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan IPG KBL Tahun 2011,177-191.Zainudin Abu Bakar & Mohd Rashidi Mat Jalil. (2007). Kaedah petak sifir: Kajianperbandingan matematik tahun 4 dalam penguasaan fakta asas darab. JournalPendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 12, 91-98.Zainal Abidin Zainuddin. (2008). Keberkesanan Kaedah Konstruktivisme DalamPengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Zainudin Abu Bakar & Mohd Rashidi Mat Jalil. (2012). Keberkesanan Kaedah PetakSifir Dalam Penguasaan Fakta Asas Darab Dalam Matematik Tahun 4: SatuKajian di Sekolah Kebangsaan Mersing Johor.Zamatun Nasrah Marwan. (2011). Meningkat penguasaan murid dalam operasi darabnombor tiga digit dengan dua digit melibatkan pengumpulan semula. KualaLumpur: Open Universiti. |