Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan kesan penggunaan CogSketch dalam modul pembelajaranSains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel. Pembinaanmodul adalah berasaskan Model Kitaran Pembelajaran 5E (Engagement, Exploration, Explanation,Elaboration and Evaluati...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5552 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5552 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
Q Science (General) |
| spellingShingle |
Q Science (General) Fadzil Mohamed Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| description |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan kesan penggunaan CogSketch dalam modul pembelajaranSains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel. Pembinaanmodul adalah berasaskan Model Kitaran Pembelajaran 5E (Engagement, Exploration, Explanation,Elaboration and Evaluation). Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telah digunakan dalam kajian ini.Pemilihan adalah secara rawak 52 subjek yang mengambil mata pelajaran Sains menggunakan teknikkumpulan kawalan tidak setara ujian pra/ujian pasca (non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest)yang melibatkan dua buah kelas terpilih daripada tujuh buah kelas tingkatan satu yangmempunyai pencapaian sederhana di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuala Selangor. Subjek-subjekkajian ini terbahagi kepada 28 orang murid kumpulan eksperimen dan 24 orang murid kumpulankawalan yang terlibat dalam lapan minggu kajian. Dua jenis instrumen kajian yang telahdisahkan oleh tiga orang pakar digunakan iaitu ujian spatial PSVT:R dan ujian pencapaian bagi topiksel. Manakala instrumen soal selidik menggunakan item-item yang diadaptasi daripada ModelPenerimaan Teknologi dengan nilai alpha Cronbach =.87. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakanstatistik deskriptif dan statistik inferens yang melibatkan ujian-t bebas dan ANCOVAsatu hala. Hasil ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan [t(50)=2.24;p |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Fadzil Mohamed |
| author_facet |
Fadzil Mohamed |
| author_sort |
Fadzil Mohamed |
| title |
Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| title_short |
Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| title_full |
Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| title_fullStr |
Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| title_sort |
kesan penggunaan cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5552 |
| _version_ |
1747833207225581568 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:55522021-02-10 Kesan penggunaan Cogsketch dalam modul pembelajaran sains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel 2020 Fadzil Mohamed Q Science (General) Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan kesan penggunaan CogSketch dalam modul pembelajaranSains terhadap keupayaan spatial dan pencapaian murid tingkatan satu dalam topik sel. Pembinaanmodul adalah berasaskan Model Kitaran Pembelajaran 5E (Engagement, Exploration, Explanation,Elaboration and Evaluation). Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telah digunakan dalam kajian ini.Pemilihan adalah secara rawak 52 subjek yang mengambil mata pelajaran Sains menggunakan teknikkumpulan kawalan tidak setara ujian pra/ujian pasca (non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest)yang melibatkan dua buah kelas terpilih daripada tujuh buah kelas tingkatan satu yangmempunyai pencapaian sederhana di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuala Selangor. Subjek-subjekkajian ini terbahagi kepada 28 orang murid kumpulan eksperimen dan 24 orang murid kumpulankawalan yang terlibat dalam lapan minggu kajian. Dua jenis instrumen kajian yang telahdisahkan oleh tiga orang pakar digunakan iaitu ujian spatial PSVT:R dan ujian pencapaian bagi topiksel. Manakala instrumen soal selidik menggunakan item-item yang diadaptasi daripada ModelPenerimaan Teknologi dengan nilai alpha Cronbach =.87. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakanstatistik deskriptif dan statistik inferens yang melibatkan ujian-t bebas dan ANCOVAsatu hala. Hasil ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan [t(50)=2.24;p 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5552 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5552 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Alias, M., Black, T. R., & Gray, D. E. (2002). Effect of instructions on spatial visualisationability in civil engineering students. International Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12.Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, & Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). MenguasaiPenyelidikan Dalam Penyelidikan: Teori, Analisis & Interpretasi Data. Selangor: PTS Publications &Distributors Sdn Bhd.Baldwin, S. L. (1985). Instruction in spatial skills and its effect on math achievement in theintermediate grades. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, 1984). DissertationAbstracts International, 46 (3), 595.Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1973). Differential Aptitude Tests.New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial Ability and Earth Science Conceptual Understanding.Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402.Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional Design Models. In Handbook of Research onEducational Communications and Technology (pp. 7787). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5.Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children?s exploration of big ideas.International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319-341.Brown, M. H., & Schwartz, R. S. (2009). Connecting photosynthesis and cellular respiration:Preservice teachers' conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 791.Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E Instructionl Model: Personal Reflections and ContemporaryImplications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13Bybee, R.W., Taylor, A. J., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N.(2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness and applications. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bscs.org/pdf/ bscs5eexec summa ry.pdfCarlisle, D. (2012). Spatial Reasoning in Organic Chemistry: From Novice to Expert the MissingLinks. Science Education, In Preparation.Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies.New York: Cambridge University Press.Che Soh Said, Irfan Naufal Umar, Balakrishnan Muniandy, & Shakinaz Desa. (2015).Aplikasi Teknologi Mutimedia dalam Pembelajaran Sains Biologi: Kesan Terhadap Pelajar Berbeza TahapKeupayaan Spatial. Journal of ICT in Education, 2(2015), 15-25.Christensen, L. B. (2001). Experimental methodology (8th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn andBacon.Clark, J. M., & Piavio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review,3, 149-210College Entrance Examination Board. (1939). CEEB Special Aptitude Test in spatial relations. NewYork, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Coleman, S.L., & Gotch, A.J. (1998) Spatial perception skills of chemistry students.J Chem Educ 75, 206209Connor, J. M., Serbin, L. A., & Schackman, M. (1977). Sex differences in children?s response totraining on a visual-spatial test. Developmental Psychology, 13 (3), 293-294.Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., Saorin, J. L., & Conesa, J. (2005). Improving visualizationskills in engineering education. Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(5), 24-31.Cook, T. D. (2003). Why have educational evaluators chosen not to do randomized experiments? TheANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 114-149.Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experiments: design and analysis issues for fieldsetting. Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.Cramer, K. B. (2012). Impact of constructivism via the biological sciences curriculum study (BSCS)5E Model on student science achievement and attitude (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/1121Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (4thEd.). United Kingdom. Sage PublicationDavis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user Acceptance of informationTechnology. MIS Quart, 13(3), 319-339.Dorval, M., & Ppin, M. (1986). Effect of playing a video game on a measure of spatialvisualization. Perceptual Motor Skills, 62, 159-162.Dow, W. (2006). The need to change pedagogies in science and technology subjects: A Europeanperspective. International Journal TechnologyDesign Education, 16 (3), pp. 307-321.Fazzlijan Mohamed Adnan Khan, & Mona Masood. (2013). The Development and Testing ofMultimedia-assisted Mastery Learning Courseware with regard to the Learning of CellularRespiration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,103, 999-1005.Field, A. (2011). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London. Sage Publications Ltd.Forbus, K. D. (2011). Qualitative modeling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,2(4):374391.Forbus, K. D., Usher, J. M., Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., & Wetzel, J. (2008).CogSketch: Open-domain Sketch Understanding for Cognitive Science Research and for Education. SBM,8, 159-166.Friedlander, A. (1985). Achievement in similarity tasks: Effect of instruction, and relationshipwith achievement in spatial visualization at the middle grades level. (Doctoral Dissertation,Michigan State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (12), 3570.Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Friedman, T. L., & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). That used to be us. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, &Giroux.Gabare, C., Gabarre, S., Rosseni Din, Parilah Mohd Shah, & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2014). iPads in theforeign language classroom?: A learner ? s perspective. The Southeast Asian Journal of EnglishLanguage Studies, 20(1), 115128.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysisand applications. Pearson Higher Ed.Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and Learning with ICTTools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers? Perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of EducationalTechnology, 4(2).Glynn, S. (2007). The teaching-with-analogies model. Science and Children, 52-55.Guay, R. (1977). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test-Visualization of Rotations.Purdue ResearchFoundation, West Lafayette, IN.Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology's ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychologicalreview, 89(1), 48.Gustafson, K. L. (1991). Survey of Instructional Development Models: Syracuse University.Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional developmentmodels (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY.Harle, ., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection tochemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), pp. 351-360Hoffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial Ability: It?s Influence on Learning with Visualizations- AMeta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245-269.Hoskins, P. (2013). Maximising Students' Progress and Engagement in Science through the Use of theBiological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) 5E Instructional Model. School Science Review, 94(349),117-126.Jee, B. D., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., Sageman, B., & Uttal, D. H. (2009). Drawing on Experience: Useof Sketching to Evaluate Knowledge of Spatial Scientific Concepts. Paper presented at the 31stAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Johns, R. (2010). Likert items and scales. Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet, 1.Jonassen, D. H., & Hannum, W. H. (1987). Research-Based Principles for Designing Computer Software.Educational Technology, 27(12), 7-14.Jones, L. R., Wheeler, G., & Centurino, V. A. (2015). TIMSS 2015 science framework. TIMSS, 2960.Kamisah Osman, Zanaton Iksan, & Lilia Halim. (2007). Sikap terhadap Sains dan Sikap Saintifik dikalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 32(03), 39-60.Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. (2005). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.Kaware, S. S., & Sain, S. K. (2015). ICT Application in Education: An Overview.International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 2, 25-32.Kell, J. H., & Lubinski, D. (2013). Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational andOccupational Settings. Roeper Review, 35(2013), 219-230.Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technicalinnovation spatial ability?s unique role. Psychological science,24(9), 1831-1836.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan MalaysiaKementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal- Ringkasan Esekutif. Pelan PembangunanPendidikan Malaysia 20132025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Sains: Dokumen Standard Kurikulum danPentaksiran. Terbitan Terhad. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.Khalid Johari. (2003). Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Konsep dan Prosedur. Selangor:Prentice Hall.Knapp, A. (2011). Why schools don?t value spatial reasoning. Forbes. Retrieved fromhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/12/27/why-dont-schools-value- spatial-reasoning.Lane, D., Seery, N., & Gordon, S. (2009). The Understated Value of Freehand Sketching in TechnologyEducation. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 73(3), 13-22.Lazarowitz, R., & Naim, R. (2013). Learning the cell Structures with Three- Dimensional Models:Student's Achievement by Methids, Type of School and Questions' Cognitive Level. Journal ScienceEducational Technology, 22(2013), 500-508.Lee, E. A. L., & Wong, K.W. (2014). Learning with Desktop Virtual Reality: Low Spatial AbilityLearners are More Positively Affected. Computers & Education, 79(2014), 49-58.Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use andInterpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Leopold, C., Grska, R. A., & Sorby, S. A. (2001). International experiences in developing thespatial visualization abilities of engineering students. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 5(1),81-91.Levine, J. M. (1980). Trainability of abilities (Report No. 154-400). Arlington, VA: Office ofNaval Research.Likert, R. (1932), A Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.) Advances in the psychology of human intelligence 181- 248.Lohman, D. F. (1994a). Spatial ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence 2,10001007.Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial ability and G. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.).Human abilities: Their nature and measurement 97-116.Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification anddevelopment. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344-351.Mack, . E. (1995). Computer-aided design training and spatial visualization abilityin gifted adolescents. Journal of Technology Studies, 21 (2), 57-63.Madinah Mohamad. (2014). Transformasi Pendidikan Negara Menganjak Kualiti Generasi Baharu. Paperpresented at the Persidangan Puspanita Kali Ke-2.Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Measuring Spatial Ability of First-Year Engineering Students Withthe Revised PSVT:R. American Society for Engineering Education.Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A Meta-Analysis on Gender Differences in Mental Rotation AbilityMeasured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT: R).Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 6994.Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of EducationalAchievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J.F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., Arora, A.,& Galia, J.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA?s trends ininternational mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved fromhttp://timssandpirls.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/sciencereport.htmlMayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words?Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of educational psychology,86(3), 389.McFie, J. (1973). Intellectual imbalance: A perceptual hypothesis. British Journal of Social andClinical Psychology, 12, 433-434.McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic,hormonal, and neurological influence. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889-918.McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education. Bostan: Pearson Education.Michael, W. B., Guilford, J. P., Fruchter, B., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1957). The description ofspatial visualization abilities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 17, 185-199.Miller, C. L. (1992a). The results of integrating real and computer-generated models into atraditional sketching based engineering graphics course. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 56(2), 27-47.Mohammadpour, E., (2012). A multilevels on trends in Malaysian secondary school students? scienceachievement and associated school and student predictors.Science Education, Wiley Periodicals, 96(6): 10131046.Mohler, J. L., & Miller, C. L. (2008). Improving spatial ability with mentored sketching.Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(1), 1927.Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2007). TIMSS in perspective: Lessons learned from IEA?s fourdecades of international mathematics assessments. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Lessons learned: Whatinternational assessments tell us about math achievement (pp. 936). Washington, DC: BrookingsInstitution Press.Najjar, L. J. (1998). Principles of educational multimedia user interfacedesign. Human Factors: The journal of the human factors and ergonomics society, 40(2), 311-323.Najjar, L. J. (1995). Dual coding as a possible explanation for the effects of multimedia onlearning.National Center for Educational Statistics. (2016). Overview: The Trends in InternationalMathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Retrieved 1 June, 2016, from https://nces.ed.gov/timss/National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, D.C.: NationalAcademies Press.National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards (pp. 262). Washington, DC,United States of America: National Academy of Sciences.Ngah, N. S., Vadeveloo, T., Mohammed, N., & Aziz, N. A. (2019). Kajian Terhadap Tanggapan Bergunadan Mudah Digunakan Terhadap Bahan Pembelajaran. International Journal of Education, Psychology andCounseling, 4(31), 23-31. DOI: 10.35631/IJEPC.431003Nicol, A. A. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Presenting your findings: a practical guide for creatingtables. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Norazrena, & Khairul Anuar. (2007). Pengaplikasian Perisian Matematik bagi Tajuk Pecahan TerhadapPelajar Pendidikan Khas. In Bahan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Komputer 201218.Nor Jannah Hassan, Nooriza Kassim, Safani Bari, Effandi Zakaria, & Norshidah Mohamad Salleh.(2015). Infusi Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran MatematikMurid Bermasalah Penglihatan. In Seminar Internasional Pendidikan Khas Pasca SiswazahUKM-UPI-UNESA-SEAMEO SEN.Nur Qistina, & Hazman Ali. (2006). Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi (ICT) dalamKalangan Guru-Guru Sekolah Kebangsaan.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.OECD. (2010), PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading,Mathematics and Science, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264062658-enOECD. (2013), PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, ProblemSolving and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing,Paris.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-enOECD. (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic andFinancial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-enOsborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literatureand its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik. Serdang: Penerbit UniversitiPutra Malaysia.Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program(6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Park, G., Lubinski, D. L., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Recognizing Spatial Intelligence.Scientific American.Piavio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: OxfordUniversity Press.Quasha, W. H., & Likert, R. (1937). The Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test.Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 197-204.Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and Spatial Modes in Science Learning International Journal of ScienceEducation, 31(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500690802595763Rieber, L. P. (1996). Animation as a Distractor to Learning. International Journal of InstructionalMedia, 23(1), 53-57.Rindermann, H., & Thompson, J. (2011). Cognitive capitalism: The effect of cognitive ability onwealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom. Psychological Science, 22,754763.Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil, & Abdul Razak Nordin. (2010). Hubungan Guru-Pelajar dan Kaitannya denganKomitmen Belajar Pelajar: Adakah Guru Berkualiti Menghasilkan Perbezaan Pembelajaran antara JantinaPelajar? JurnalPendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 61-69.Rovet, J. (1983). The education of spatial transformations. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Spatialcognition: The structure and development of mental representations of spatial relations (pp.164-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Sakaran, U. (2003). Research Method for Business: A skill building approach. 4?? ed.US: John Wiley & Sons.Shavalier, M. (2004). The effects of CAD-like software on the spatial ability of middle schoolstudents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31 (1), 37-49.Shepard, R. N. (1978). Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B.S. Randhawa & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking, and communication, 133190.Siti Azian Azrol Nasoha Bujang. (2013). Pembinaan modul pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (PBMBIO-SCORE) dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian dan pemikiran kritis pelajar (Tesis Master). UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.Siti Shahida, & Che Nidzam. (2014). Penggunaan Modul Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Berasaskan AnalogiTerhadap Pencapaian Pelajar Bagi Topik Enzim Dalam Biologi Tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &Matematik Malaysia, 4(2), 91-103.Smith, I. M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego: Robert R.KnappSmith, W. S., & Litman, C. I. (1979). Early adolescent girls? and boys? learning of a spatialvisualization skill. Science Education, 63 (5), 671-676.Smith, W. S., & Schroeder, C. K. (1979). Instruction of fourth grade girls and boys on spatialvisualization. Science Education, 63 (1), 61-66.Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3?D spatial skills for engineeringstudents. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459- 480.Sorby, S. A., & Wysocki, A. F. (2003). Introduction to 3-D spatial visualization: An activeapproach. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson-Delmar Learning.Stieff, M. (2007). Mental Rotation and Diagrammatic Reasoning in Science. Learning and Instruction,17(2), 219-234 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.012Stieff, ., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEMAchievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607-615Super, D. E., & Bachrach, P. B. (1957). Scientific careers and vocational development theory. NewYork, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College Bureau of Publications.Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial Orientation Skill and Mathematical Problem Solving.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216229. http://doi.org/10.2307/749375Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatialexperience on mental rotation: gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology,22(7), 9961013.https://doi.org/ 10.1002/acp.1774Tillotson, M. L. (1984). The effect of instruction in spatial visualization on spatial abilitiesand mathematical problem solving. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Florida, 1984).Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (9),2792.Tuna, A., & Kacar, A. (2013). The effect of 5E learning cycle model in teaching Trigonometry onstudents? academic achievement and the permanence of their knowledge. International Journal on NewTrends in Education and Their Implications 4(1), 73-87.Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S.(2013a). The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta- Analysis of Training Studies. PsychologicalBulletin, 139(2), 352402. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013b). Exploring and Enhancing Spatial ThinkingLinks to Achievement in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics?. Current Directions inPsychological Science, 22(5), 367- 373.Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three- dimensionalspatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599604.Veurink, N. L., Hamlin, A. J., Kampe, J. C. M., Sorby, S. A., Blasko, D. G., Holliday- Darr, K. A.,& Knott, T. W. (2009). Enhancing visualization skills-improving options and success (EnViSIONS) ofengineering and technologystudents. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 73(2), 1-17.Vogt, W. P. (1999). Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the SocialSciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning overfifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies itsimportance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817835.Wiebe, E. N. (1993). Visualization of three-dimensional form: A discussion of theoretical models ofinternal representation. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 57 (1), 18-28.Witkin, H. A. (1969). Social influences in the development of cognitive style. In D. Gaslin (Ed.),Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 687-706). New York: RandMcNally.Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Traininggeneralized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(4), 763-771.Yue, J. (2004). Spatial Visualization by Orthogonal Rotations. In Proceedings of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Expositions.Yue, J. (2006). Spatial Visualization by Isometric Drawing. In Proceedings of the2006IJME-INTERTECH Conference, Union, New Jersey.Zabani Darus (2012). Status kedudukan Malaysia dalam TIMSS dan PISA; Satu refleksi. Retrieved fromhttp://education.um.edu. my/images/education2/download/kolokium/%281%29%20 Dr%20Zabani.pdf |