Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat

Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat

Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesan modul eksperimen prauniversitiberbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat. Modulini telah dibangun menggunakan model ADDIE dan modul ini telah disahkan oleh enam orang pakar.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5559
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5559
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin
Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
description Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesan modul eksperimen prauniversitiberbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat. Modulini telah dibangun menggunakan model ADDIE dan modul ini telah disahkan oleh enam orang pakar.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen pra dan pasca- ujian bagi menguji keberkesananmodul yang dibangunkan. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 31 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan 34orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan yang telah dipilih secara rawak mudah kelompok daripada populasiseramai 196 orang pelajar yang mengambil kursus Fizik Asas I di salah sebuah universiti awam.Instrumen kajian terdiri daripada ujian pencapaian dan soal selidik. Ujian digunakan untuk mengujikeberkesanan modul manakala soal selidik digunakan untuk mengukur persepsi pelajarkumpulan rawatan terhadap kebolehgunaan modul. Soal selidik telah dibina berdasarkan TechnologyAcceptance Model. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens sepertikekerapan, min, sisihan piawai, ujian-t, saiz kesan dan kolerasi Pearson. Hasil ujian- t[t(63)=-3.38, p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin
author_facet Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin
author_sort Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin
title Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
title_short Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
title_full Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
title_fullStr Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
title_full_unstemmed Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
title_sort kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5559
_version_ 1747833208027742208
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:55592021-02-15 Kesan modul eksperimen prauniversiti berbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat 2020 Nurul Aina Syakirah Zainal Abidin LB Theory and practice of education Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesan modul eksperimen prauniversitiberbantukan telefon pintar terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam topik daya graviti dan berat. Modulini telah dibangun menggunakan model ADDIE dan modul ini telah disahkan oleh enam orang pakar.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen pra dan pasca- ujian bagi menguji keberkesananmodul yang dibangunkan. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 31 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan 34orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan yang telah dipilih secara rawak mudah kelompok daripada populasiseramai 196 orang pelajar yang mengambil kursus Fizik Asas I di salah sebuah universiti awam.Instrumen kajian terdiri daripada ujian pencapaian dan soal selidik. Ujian digunakan untuk mengujikeberkesanan modul manakala soal selidik digunakan untuk mengukur persepsi pelajarkumpulan rawatan terhadap kebolehgunaan modul. Soal selidik telah dibina berdasarkan TechnologyAcceptance Model. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens sepertikekerapan, min, sisihan piawai, ujian-t, saiz kesan dan kolerasi Pearson. Hasil ujian- t[t(63)=-3.38, p 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5559 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5559 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik A. Rahim, N. (2013). Penggunaan mobile learning (m-learning) untuk tujuanpembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar kejuruteraan UTHM. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti TunHussein Onn Malaysia.Abdul Kadir, M. N. B., Abdul Karim, M. M., & Abd. Rahman, N. (2016). Sikap pelajar terhadappembelajaran Fizik dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian dalam kalangan pelajar sains. JurnalPersonalia Pelajar, 19(1), 2338.Abdul Rahim, R. (1996). Persepsi pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup pilihanpertanian, Laporan Sarjana, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.Abu, N. E. B., & Eu, L. K. (2017). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian Matematik Tambahan tingkatan4. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1-10.Adler, M. (1963). Some implications of the theories of Jean Piaget and J. S. Bruner for education.Toronto, Canada: Board of Education, Research Department.Agranovich, S., & Assaraf, O. B. Z. (2013). What makes children like learning science? Anexamination of the attitudes of primary school students towards science lessons. Journal ofEducation and Learning, 2(1), 55-69.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students' attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobilelearning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of EducationalTechnology, 8(2), 111119.Alias, S. N., & Ibrahim, F. (2016). A preliminary study of students problems on Newtons Law.International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(4), 133-139.Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training.Athabasca University Press.Alsagoff, S. A. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas kepada modulpengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 3(1),46-57.Anderson, T. (2005). Design-based research and its application to a call centre innovation indistance education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 69-84.Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. J. (2007). Mixed methods research is an effective method of enquiry forcommunity health research. Contemporary Nurse, 23(2), 145-153.Applefield, J. M., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward abetter understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35-53.Arievitch, I. M. (2007). An activity theory perspective on educational technology andlearning. Dalam D. W. Kritt & L. T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology,critical perspective, possible futures (pp. 4972). Plymouth: Lexington Books.Assin, M. K. (2013). Amalan penggunaan modul pengajaran berasaskan ModulMultimedia Interaktif (MMI) dalam Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional (PTV). Tesis Dr. Fal.,Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Awodun, A. O., Oni, S. A., & Aladejana, A. L. (2014). Students variables as predictor of secondary school students performance in physics. International Journal of Scientific andResearch Publication, 4(8), 541-545.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan Empat.Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pengajaran dan PembelajaranBerasaskan Inkuiri. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Baharuddin, M. A. (2010). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran berasaskan projek bagi mata pelajaranFizik KBSM tingkatan empat. Tesis Dr. Fal., Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Basiran, H., & Abu, M. S. (2006). Pembangunan dan penilaian modul PdP menggunakan kalkulator grafik dalam pembelajaran persamaan kuadratik. Tesis Dr. Fal., Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Bawaneh, K. A., Md Zain, A. N., Saleh, S., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2012). The effect of a brain-basedteaching method on conceptual change in students understanding of electricity. EurasianJournal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 4(2), 7996.Becker, W. E., Becker, S. R., & Watts, M. W. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching economics: More alternativesto chalk and talk. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher,72(7), 30-33.Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models,tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349-377.Bilal Ali, M., & Ngah Nordin, N., S. (2009). Perisian pembelajaran berbantukan komputer berdasarkanpendekatan kontekstual bagi tajuk Graviti untuk subjek Fizik tingkatan empat. Tesis Dr. Fal.,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). New York, NY: SpringerScience and Business Media.Brown, T. (2005). Towards a model for M-Learning in Afrika. International Jurnal on E- Learning,4(3), 299-315.Casey, D., & Murphy, K. (2009). Issues in using methodological triangulation inresearch. Nurse Researcher, 16(4), 40-55.Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffoldingbird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359.Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a technicalinnovationaudit. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the ProductDevelopment & Management Association, 13(2), 105-136.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Asas statistik penyelidikan (2nd ed.). KualaLumpur: Mc. Graw Hill Education.Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Kuala Lumpur: Mcgraw-Hill Education. Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.).New York, USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, (23)6, 42-44.Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluatingQuantitative and Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nded.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Selection of a research design. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/ 22780_Chapter_1.pdfCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodsapproaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodsapproaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc.Creswell, J. W., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The movement of mixed methods research and the role ofeducators. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 321-333.Cui, Y., & Bull, S. (2005). Context and learner modeling for the mobile foreign language learner.System, 33(2), 353367.Dahaman, A. (2014). Pembangunan modul M-Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Institut PendidikanGuru, Disertasi Dr. Fal., Universiti Malaya.Daud, N. D. M. (2006). Penggunaan Pengajaran Berbantukan Komputer (PBK) dalam pengajaran danpembelajaran oleh guru Kimia di daerah Kota Tinggi. Disertasi Dr. Fal., Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Daud, S. N. A. A., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2009). Pembangunan modul eksperimen Fizikberbantukan komputer bagi tajuk Momentum. Tesis Dr. Fal., Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance ofinformation technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319340.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computertechnology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior.New York: Plenum Press.DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). SagePublications.Devinder, S. & Abdullah, Z. (2006). Mobile learning in wireless classrooms. Malaysian OnlineJournal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(2), 26-42.Djamarah. 1996. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the highereducation landscape. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 12-21.Embong, H. B. (2005). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan penggunaan perisian multimediaelektrokimia dalam PdP kimia tingkatan 4. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Engestrm, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach todevelopmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures inhigher education. Computers and Education, 50(2), 491-498.Fatmawati, E. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk menganalisispenerimaan terhadap sistem informasi di perpustakaan. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi(e-Journal), 9(1), 1-13.Feng, W., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhancedlearning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach forteaching. Teachers College Press.Fosnot, C.T. & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Dalam C.T.Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. (pp 8- 33). New York: TeachersCollege Press.Fraenkel, N., Goldstein, G., Sarig, I., & Haddad, R. (2002). Post-deployment monitoring andanalysis of server performance. U.S. Patent Application Publication.Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles ofinstructional design. Performance Improvement, 44(2), 44-46.Galili, I. (1993). Weight and gravity: Teachers ambiguity and students confusion about theconcepts, International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 149-162.Galili, I. (2001). Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educationalternational Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1073-1093.Galili, I. & Lehavi, Y. (2006). Definitions of physical concepts: A study of physicsteachers knowledge and views. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 28(5), 521-541.Gefen, D., & Larsen, K. (2017). Controlling for lexical closeness in survey research: Ademonstration on the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Association for InformationSystems, 18(10), 727-757.George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning- a New Stage of ?-Learning. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies- CompSysTech,4(28), 1-5.Gonzlez, M. ., Gonzlez, M. ., Martn, M. E., Llamas, C., Martnez, ., Vegas, J., ... &Hernndez, C. (2017). Teaching and learning physics with smartphones. Dalam Blended Learning:Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 866-885). IGI Global.Green, M. (2001). The wireless revolution: Latrobe junior high project. NationalEducation Association. Diperoleh daripada http://www.nea.oro/neatodav/0103/cover.htmGustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructionaldevelopment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73-89.Haberlandt, K., (1997). Cognitive Psychology. USA : Allyn & Bacon.Halili, S. H., Sulaiman, S., & Rashid, M. R. A. (2011). the effectiveness of learning process using video conferencing technology. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia| Malaysian,36(1), 55-65.Halim, L., Mohd, T. S., & Haron, Z. (2002). Strategi pengajaran Fizik untuk guru sains.Pearson Education Malaysia.Halim, L., Yong, T. K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2014). Overcoming students misconceptions on forces inequilibrium: An action research study. Creative Education, 5(11), 1032- 1042.Hamdan, A., Din, R., & Manaf, S. Z. A. (2013). Penerimaan M-Pembelajaran dalam sistem pendidikandi Malaysia melalui the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Satuanalisis literatur. 1st International Conference on Mobil Learning, Applications, and Services(mobilcase2012), 1(2), 93-97.Harun, A. H. (2005). PdP Fizik secara aktif menggunakan kaedah makmal berasaskanmikrokomputer bagi topik Daya dan Gerakan. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti PendidikanSultan Idris.Hashim, M. H. M., & Kasbolah, M. (2012). Application of Needham's Five PhaseConstructivism Model in (Civil, Electrical and Mechanical) Engineering Subject atTechnical Secondary School. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 117-128.Galili, I. & Lehavi, Y. (2006). Definitions of physical concepts: A study of physicsteachers knowledge and views. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 28(5), 521-541.Gefen, D., & Larsen, K. (2017). Controlling for lexical closeness in survey research: Ademonstration on the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Association for InformationSystems, 18(10), 727-757.George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning- a New Stage of ?-Learning. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies- CompSysTech,4(28), 1-5.Gonzlez, M. ., Gonzlez, M. ., Martn, M. E., Llamas, C., Martnez, ., Vegas, J., ... &Hernndez, C. (2017). Teaching and learning physics with smartphones. Dalam Blended Learning:Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 866-885). IGI Global.Green, M. (2001). The wireless revolution: Latrobe junior high project. NationalEducation Association. Diperoleh daripada http://www.nea.oro/neatodav/0103/cover.htmGustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructionaldevelopment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73-89.Haberlandt, K., (1997). Cognitive Psychology. USA : Allyn & Bacon.Halili, S. H., Sulaiman, S., & Rashid, M. R. A. (2011). the effectiveness of learning process using video conferencing technology. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia| Malaysian,36(1), 55-65.Halim, L., Mohd, T. S., & Haron, Z. (2002). Strategi pengajaran Fizik untuk guru sains.Pearson Education Malaysia.Halim, L., Yong, T. K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2014). Overcoming students misconceptions on forces inequilibrium: An action research study. Creative Education, 5(11), 1032- 1042.Hamdan, A., Din, R., & Manaf, S. Z. A. (2013). Penerimaan M-Pembelajaran dalam sistem pendidikandi Malaysia melalui the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Satuanalisis literatur. 1st International Conference on Mobil Learning, Applications, and Services(mobilcase2012), 1(2), 93-97.Harun, A. H. (2005). PdP Fizik secara aktif menggunakan kaedah makmal berasaskanmikrokomputer bagi topik Daya dan Gerakan. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti PendidikanSultan Idris.Hashim, M. H. M., & Kasbolah, M. (2012). Application of Needham's Five PhaseConstructivism Model in (Civil, Electrical and Mechanical) Engineering Subject atTechnical Secondary School. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 117-128.Ismail, Z. H., & Jusoh, I. (2001). Relationship between science process skills and logical thinkingabilities of Malaysian students. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in SoutheastAsia, 24(2), 67-77.Jamian, A. R., & Ismail, H. (2013). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyeronokkan dalam PdP Bahasa Melayu.Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 3(2), 49-63.Jasman, K. (2014). Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah terhadap motivasi pelajar dalam matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup. Laporan Sarjana, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Jinn, J. H. (2011). SPSS for Windows (Version 20). Diperoleh dari https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/4CE39E3F-BF40-0D23- 0D675539A8F525E7/215_spss20_fall_2013.pdfJonassen, D. H. (2002). Learning as activity. Educational Technology, 42(2), 4551.Juakim, Y. (2013). Hubungan sikap, minat dan pengajaran guru dengan pencapaian akademik dalam mata pelajaran Matematik di kalangan pelajar di Sekolah Menengah Kota Marudu,Sabah. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Kaltaki, D., & Didi?, N. (2007, April). Identification of pre?service physics teachersmisconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3?tier misconception test. Dalam AIP ConferenceProceedings, 899(1), 499-500.Kamal, N. Z. (2008). Pembangunan modul bagi tajuk 'Panduan menggunakan teks pada paparanelektronik'. Disertasi Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Kamil, K. 1991. Keberkesanan program pengayaan alam dan manusia secara bermodul untuk murid-muridpencapaian tinggi Tahun Lima. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Keengwe, J., & Anyanwu, L. O. (2007). Computer technology-infused learningenhancement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 387-393.Khalid, F., Daud, M. Y., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2016). Perbandingan penggunaan telefon pintar untuktujuan umum dan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar universiti. Dalam InternationalConference on Education and Regional Development, 173-182.Khandagale, V. S., & Chavan, R. (2017). Identification of misconceptions for Gravity, Motionand Inertia among secondary school students. Online Submission, 4(11), 197-205.Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the use of the ASSURE Model by K 12 teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153168. doi:10.1080/07380569.201 6.1203208Kruse, K. (2002). Introduction to instructional design and the ADDIE model. Dimuat turun daripadahttp://docshare01.docshare.tips/files/12024/120247130.pdfKuciapski M. (2010). Model for project management for development and implementation of e-learningcourses. Dalam P. Forbig & H. Gunther (eds.), Perspectives in business informatics research,proceedings of 9th international conference (pp. 43-54).Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Kuhn, J., & Vogt, P. (2013). Applications and examples of experiments with mobile phonesand smartphones in physics lessons. Frontiers in Sensors, 1(4), 67-73.Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers.London: Routledg.Lambri, A., & Mahamod, Z. (2015). Pelaksanaan aktiviti pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam prosespengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Pendeta: Jurnal Bahasa, Pendidikan dan Sastera Melayu,6, 98-117.Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2013). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design.Oxon: Routledge.Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. Dalam J. V. Wertsch (Ed.),The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 41208). New York: Sharpe.Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning toassist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers andEducation, 54(2), 446-454.Lip, R., Hashim, S., & Musa, M. K. (2018). Pembangunan dan penilaian tahap kesesuaian penggunaanE-Modul asas animasi 2D berdasarkan teori konstruktivisme Model Needham 5 fasa. Politeknik &Kolej Komuniti Journal of Life Long Learning, 2(1), 16-27.Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003).Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 19(3), 371-382.Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet.Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13(2), 206-222.Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. NursingResearch, 35(6), 382 385.Madar, A. R. (2009). Keberkesanan animasi grafik dalam kalangan pelajar berbeza gaya icognitif dankebolehan visualisasi spatial di politeknik. Tesis Dr. Fal., Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the useof mobile technology. Computers and Education, 68(1), 76-85.Mazlan, A. (2018). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pendekatanpengajaran berasaskan otak dengan integrasi I-Think dan Brain Gym untuk meningkatkankefahaman konseptual dan motivasi belajar Fizik pelajar matrikulasi. Tesis Dr. Fal., UniversitiSains Malaysia.McCabe, T. J., & Butler, C. W. (1989). Design complexity measurement andtesting. Communications of the ACM, 32(12), 1415-1425.McLoughlin, P. M. (2009). Inquiry-Based Learning in the calculus sequence: A mostchallenging endeavor. The American Mathematical Society and the MathematicalAssociation of America, 56-65.Md Sah, N. E. F. (2012). Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan kaedah inkuiri bagi subjekMatematik. Laporan Sarjana, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Md. Salleh, S., & Tai, L. Y. (2009). Pembangunan perisian pembelajaran berbantukan komputermenggunakan pendekatan permainan bagi mata pelajaran Fizik tingkatan empat: Forces and MotionWork,Energy and Power. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaMiller, P. J., & Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed method research designs: A case study of their adoptionin a doctor of business administration program. International Journal of Multiple ResearchApproaches, 5(3), 387-402.Mohd Noah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan danmodul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit UPM.Mohd Zaid, N. & Mohamad, F. (2015). Pembangunan modul multimedia interaktif menggunakan pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskan. senario bagi tajuk pembangunan perisianmultimedia berasaskan cd-rom. Jurnal Persatuan Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional Malaysia (4),47-57.Mohid, S. Z., Ramli, R., Abdul Rahman, K., & Shahabudin, N. N. (2018, Ogos). Teknologi Multimedia dalam Pendidikan Abad 21. Dalam 5th International Research Management & InnovationConference (IRMIC).Mohtar, L. E. (2012). Ciri-ciri kreativiti bakal guru dalam latihan amali Fizik dan projek inovasiFizik. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. PerformanceImprovement, 42(5), 3436.Morris, N. P., Lambe, J., Ciccone, J., & Swinnerton, B. (2016). Mobile technology:Students perceived benefits of apps for learning neuroanatomy. Journal of Computer AssistedLearning, 32(5), 430-442.Morrison, G. R., & Anglin, G. J. (2012). Instructional design for technology-based systems. DalamInformed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Enhanced Learningand Teaching (pp. 38-56). IGI Global.Mukhtar, N. M. A., Hashim, F., Mokhtar, M., Abdul Wahab, N. A., Mohd Napiah. N. A., & Hasan, S.(2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Fizik: Satu sudutpandangan. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 195-201.Murshed, M. (2013). Pemindahan pembelajaran antara konsep dan aplikasi keseimbangan daya sertatrigonometri dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Musa. (2018, 17 Disember). Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Diperoleh pada 25 September 2019, dari https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/dasarmenu/falsafah-pendidikan-kebangsaanNaismith, L., Sharples, M., Vavoula, G., & Lonsdale, P. (2004). Literature review inmobile technologies and learning. Dipetik daripada https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190143/documentNasirun, N., Muhamad Noor, S., Yusoff, R. Z., & Othman, A. A. (2016). Isu kesahandalaman terhadap kaedah penyelidikan kuasi eksperimen di dalam pendidikan keusahawanan.ASEAN Entrepreneurship Journal (AEJ), 2(2), 80-86.Nasohah, U. N., Abd Gani, M. I., & Md Shaid, N. (2015). Model ADDIE dalam proses reka bentuk modulpengajaran: Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia sebagai contoh. DalamProceeding of the International Seminar on Language Teaching IseLT, 4-5.National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the national science educationstandards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Nawi, A. (2017). Potensi penggunaan aplikasi mudah alih (Mobile Apps) dalam bidang PendidikanIslam. Online Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2). Dipetik daripadahttp://jice.um.edu.my/index.php/O-JIE/article/view/5470.Needham, R. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. The University ofLeeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.Neo, M., Neo, T. K. K., & Eshaq, A. R. M. (2007). Designing interactive multimediacurricula to enhance teaching and learning in the Malaysian classroom-from teacher- led to student-centered experiences. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(1),51-60.Ngasiman, N. (2013). Kesan kaedah pembelajaran koperatif terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Matematik. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9),1689-1699.Noordin, H. S., & Zainal Abiden, N.F. (2010). Tahap penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar dalam kalanganbakal guru Fizik semasa latihan mengajar. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Noordin, S., & Lampah, S. (2010). Tahap kefahaman kemahiran mereka bentukeksperimen dan mengeksperimen dalam kalangan pelajar tahun empat Pendidikan Fizik. Tesis Dr. Fal,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Noratiqah, S. (2010). Faktor yang mempengaruhi strategi pengajaran dalam kalangan guru didalam bidang teknik dan vokasional. Laporan Projek Sarjana Muda. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia, Johor, Malaysia.Noresah, B., & Ibrahim, A. (2010). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. Dewan Bahasa danPustaka, Kuala Lumpur.Orbani?, N. D., Dimec, D. S., & Cenci?, M. (2016). The effectiveness of a constructivistteaching model on students'understanding of photosynthesis. Journal of Baltic scienceeducation, 15(5), 575-587.Osman, K., Ismail, N. L., & Halim, L. (2006). Perisian Helaian Hamparan (PHH) dengan program Exceldan Perisian Berbantukan Komputer (PBK) dalam pembelajaran Sains: Kesan ke atas persepsi dankemahiran berfikir pelajar. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 14(1), 27 41.Othman, N. F. (2010). Tahap penggunaan aplikasi Web 2.0 dalam kalangan pelajar institusipengajian tinggi awam di Malaysia. Disertasi Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Othman, Y., & Pakar, D. R. (2016). Kesan aplikasi perisian cerita interaktif semasamengajarkan kemahiran bacaan dan kefahaman dalam kalangan murid tahun 4 di Brunei Darussalam.Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(1), 27-49.Pai, F. Y., & Huang, K. I. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model to theintroduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,78(4), 650-660.Palmer, D. (2001). Students' alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptableconceptions about gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 691- 706, DOI:10.1080/09500690010006527Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society,12(3), 150162.Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students' behavioral intention to usemobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 43(4), 592-605.Pehkonen, M., & Turunen, H. (2004). A case study on the future mobile work-basedlearning. Kertas kerja MLEARN 04. Learning Anytime Everywhere International Conference, Universityof Finland, Tempere, Finland.Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal ofEducational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227241.Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh, S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotanpenyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: Satu analisis sorotan tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.Piaget, J. (1973a). Psychology and epistemology. New York: Grossman.Piaget, J. (1973b). The affective unconscious and the cognitive unconscious. Journal of theAmerican Psychoanalytic Association, 21(2), 249-261.Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.Provalis Research. (2016). Qualitative Data Analysis Miner Lite [Software]. Dipetikdaripada https://provalisresearch.com/products/qualitative-data-analysis-software/freeware/Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001), Penilaian Kendalian Sekolah, Kuala Lumpur:Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.Quek, M. L. (2006). Pengaruh rakan sebaya dengan pencapaian Matematik di kalangan pelajartingkatan 4 di daerah Batu Pahat. Laporan Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Ramli, N. (2016). Keberkesanan pembelajaran koperatif model Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) dalam Fizik terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Laporan Sarjana, UniversitiTun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Razak, R. A., & Rahman, M. A. (2017). Pembinaan media pengajaran berasaskan multimediadi kalangan guru ICTL. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(2), 20-31.Razali, M., Jantan, R., & Hashim, S. (2003). Psikologi pendidikan. Pahang: PTSPublications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Razali, W. R. (2007). Pembinaan modul multimedia Fizik tingkatan empat bagi topik Haba dankeberkesanannya. Laporan Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. Dalam J. Van den Akker, K.Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 5266). NewYork: Routledge.Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction. MedicalReference Services Quarterly, 32(3), 244-256.Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2014). Design and development research. Dalam J. Spector,M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on EducationalCommunications and Technology (pp. 141-150). New York, NY: Springer.Ronis, D.L. (2008). Problem-Based Learning for Math & Science Intergrating Inquiry and the Internet(2nd ed). Carlifornia: Corwin Press.Saim, N., Ali, M., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2015). Proses pembinaan modul Pro-Mc Physics: Fasa analisisdan reka bentuk bagi model reka bentuk pengajaran ADDIE. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Saim, N., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Ali, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2014). Modul pengajaran cahayaquran berasaskan kaedah inkuiri bagi topik pantulan cahaya tingkatan4. Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014, 11-13 August, 2014, Skudai, Johor.Saleh, M. P. (2016). Model pengajaran M-Pembelajaran berasaskan kaedah inkuiri mata pelajaranSejarah peringkat menengah, Tesis Dr. Fal., Universiti Malaya.Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. A. (2016). Improving student understanding of theconcepts of weight and mass with a computer simulation. Journal of BalticScience Education, 15(1), 108-127.Segal, E., Peer, D., Regev, A., Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2005). Learning modulenetworks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(2005), 557-588.Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill buildingapproach. John Wiley & Sons.Senong, S. R. (2010). Persepsi pelajar terhadap penggunaan teknologi komputer dalam mata pelajran Pendidikan Islam. Laporan Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains serta Pendidikan, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia.Sharif, F., & Armitage, P. (2004). The effect of psychological and educational counselling inreducing anxiety in nursing students. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 11(4),386-392.Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning.Computer & Education, 34(2000), 177-193.Sharples, M. (2007). Big issues in mobile learning: Report of a workshop by theKaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. LSRI, University of Nottingham. Dipetik daripada: http://matchsz.inf.elte.hu/tt/docs/Sharples- 20062.pdf.Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning.Dalam Proceedings of MLearn 2005 conference 2528 October, Cape Town, South Africa. Diperolehdaripada https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228346088_Towards_a_theory_of_mobil e_learningSharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age. Dalam R.Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research (pp. 221-247).London: Sage.Shen, C., & Talavera, O. (2003). The effects of self-perception on students Mathematics andScience achievement in 38 countries based on TIMSS 1999 data. Department of Economics, AcademicTechnology Services Boston College.Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures(5th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Shulman, L. S. (1968). Psychological controversies in the teaching of Science andMathematics. The Science Teacher, 35(6), 34-90.Sihes, A. J., (2009). Teori Pembelajaran. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Siraj, S. (2004). Pembelajaran mobile dalam kurikulum masa depan [Mobile learning in futurecurriculum]. Masalah pendidikan, 27, 129-141.Siraj, S. (2005). mLearning dalam pembangunan sekolah berteknologi di Malaysia: Prospekpelaksanaan (mLearning in the development for schools with technology in Malaysia: Implementation prospects). Dalam National Seminar on ICT inEducation (pp. 17-19).Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2006). An evaluation of MLearning. The International Journal ofLearning, 12(4), 187-197.Siraj, S., & Ghani, M. F. A. (2017). Penerimaan M-Pembelajaran dalam kalangan pensyarahInstitut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia melalui The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (Utaut): Satu kajian awal. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(2), 56-73.Siraj, S., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Design and developmental research: Emergenttrends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson PublicationsSokoloff, D. R., Thornton, R. K., & Laws, P. W. (2011). RealTime Physics Active learninglaboratories, Module 1: Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Stein, H., & Galili, I. (2015). The impact of an operational definition of the weight concept on studentsunderstanding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(6), 1487-1515.Stein, H., Galili, I., & Schur, Y. (2015). Teaching a new conceptual framework of weight andgravitation in middle school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(9), 1234-1268.Subramaniam, G. K. J., & Harun, R. N. S. R. (2013). Adoption of mobile technology in highereducation: Students' perceptions of English language learning using smart phones.International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 2084-2089.Sulaiman, E. (2004). Pengenalan Pedagogi. Johor: Penerbit Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Sulaiman, S., Phang, F. A., & Ali, M. (2007). Kemahiran metakognitif dalam kalangan pelajarsekolah menengah di negeri Johor dalam menyelesaikan masalah Fizik. Fakulti Pendidikan,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect sizeor why the P value is notenough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-282.Sun, D., Looi, C. K., Wu, L., & Xie, W. (2016). The innovative immersion of mobilelearning into a science curriculum in Singapore: An exploratory study. Research in ScienceEducation, 46(4), 547-573.Suparno, P. (2001). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyagarta: Kanisius.Sutaji, S. S. (2015). Kesan penggunaan koswer multimedia animasi visual terhadappencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Matematik. Laporan Projek Sarjana, Universiti TunHussein Onn Malaysia.Syed Yahya Kamal, S. A., & Tasir, Z. (2008). Pembelajaran masa depanmobile learning (m-learning)di Malaysia. Dalam Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah, pp. 25-27.Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptancemodel. Management science, 42(1), 85-92.Taibu, R., Rudge, D., & Schuster, D. (2015). Textbook presentations of weight: Conceptualdifficulties and language ambiguities. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics EducationResearch, 11(1), 010117.Tan, J. M. & Khor, K. H. (2012). Kajian Tindakan: Penggunaan kaedah inkuiri penemuan KAKAK untukmeningkatkan prestasi murid-murid tahun empat dalam topik Fantastic Materials. DalamPersidangan Kebangsaan Pembangunan dan Pendidikan Lestari 2012 (pp. 57-65). Bukit Mertajam, PulauPinang: Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Tunku Bainun.Tang, H. T., & Omar, S. (1998). Persepsi terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran Fizik di lima buahsekolah menengah kebangsaan di Daerah pontian dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian Fiziktingkatan 4. Disertasi sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Teo, T., Wong, S. L, & Chai, C. S. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to usetechnology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: an application of theTechnology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.Tho, S. W. & Yeung, Y. Y. (2014). Innovative use of smartphones for sound resonance tubeexperiment. Teaching Science, 60(1), 39-42.Tho, S. W., Chan, K. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2015). Technology-Enhanced Physics Programme for Community-Based Science Learning: Innovative Design and Programme Evaluation in a Theme Park. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 580594.Tho, S. W., Lee T. T., & Baharom S. (2018). Scientific investigation through innovative use ofmobile devices in the playground. Teaching Science, 64(2), 25-29.Tobias, S. (1990). They're Not Dumb. They're Different.: A New Tier of Talent forScience. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 22(4), 11-30.Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A. (2008). The design and evaluation of acomputerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1319-1330.Tsai, C. H., Zhu, D. S., Ho, B. C. T., & Wu, D. D. (2010). The effect of reducing risk andimproving personal motivation on the adoption of knowledge repository system.Technological forecasting and Social change, 77(6), 840-856.Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting Educational Research Fith Edition. New York: HarcountBrace college Puplisher.Tural, G., Akdeniz, A. R., & Alev, N. (2010). Effect of 5E teaching model on student teachers understanding of weightlessness. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5),470-488.Uden, L., & Brandt, D. S. (2001). Knowledge analysis of tasks for instructional design.Educational Technology, 41(5), 5963.Vavoula, G. N., & Sharples, M. (2002). KLeOS: A personal, mobile, knowledge andlearning organisation system. Dalam Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and MobileTechnologies in Education (pp. 152-156). IEEE.Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards physics and AdditionalMathematics achievement towards Physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3),35-43.Vogt, P. & Kuhn, J. (2012). Analyzing simple pendulum phenomena with a smartphone accelerationsensor. The Physics Teacher, 50(7), 439-440.Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. Dalam L. Steffe & J. Gale(Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 3-16).Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. Dalam C. Janvier (Ed.), Problemsof representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Dalam Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Wang, S. K., & Hsu, H. Y. (2009). Using the ADDIE model to design second life activities for onlinelearners. TechTrends, 53(6), 76-81.Westfall, P. H. (2014). Kurtosis as peakedness, 19052014. RIP. The AmericanStatistician, 68(3), 191-195.Wheeler, L., & Bell, R. (2012). Open-ended inquiry. The Science Teacher, 79(6), 32-39.Woodcock, B., Middleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. (2012). Considering the smartphone learner:An investigation into student interest in the use of personal technology to enhance their learning.Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 1(1), 1-15.Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating theTechnology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) model. Computers in HumanBehavior, 67, 221-232.Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A., & Ford, A. L. (2011). University Physics with Modern Physics 13thedition. London: Addison-Wesley.Yu, F., & Conway, A. R. (2012). Mobile/smartphone use in higher education. DalamProceedings of the 2012 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 831-839).Yuen, S. C., & Yuen, P. K. (2008). Mobile learning. Dalam L. A. Tomei (Ed.),Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Zainal Abidin, N. A. S. & Tho, S. W. (2018). The development of an innovative Resonance experimentusing smartphones with free mobile software applications for tertiary education.International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1),164176.Zanzali, N. A. A., & Daud, N. (2010). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar di kalangan gurupelatih UTM yang mengajar mata pelajaran Matematik. Diperoleh pada 25 September2019, dari http://eprints.utm.my/10261/Zurita, G. & Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supportedby a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning20(4), 235243.

Similar Items