Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak

Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak

Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaianakademik murid. Kajian ini juga bagi mengenal pasti jenis gaya kepimpinan yangdiamalkan oleh guru-guru besar sebagai pemimpin. Kajian ini dilaksanakan secara tinjauan yangmelibatkan 186 orang guru di Sekolah Jeni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ganesh Kandasamy
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5598
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5598
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Ganesh Kandasamy
Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
description Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaianakademik murid. Kajian ini juga bagi mengenal pasti jenis gaya kepimpinan yangdiamalkan oleh guru-guru besar sebagai pemimpin. Kajian ini dilaksanakan secara tinjauan yangmelibatkan 186 orang guru di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Daerah Kuala Kangsar danKinta Utara, Perak. Reka bentuk kajian kuantitatif dipilih untuk menjawab tiga persoalankajian dan dua hipotesis. Data gaya kepimpinan dikutip melalui soal selidik LBDQ12. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Manakala, datapencapaian sekolah diperoleh melalui Gred Purata Sekolah. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapathubungan yang signifikan di antara gaya kepimpinan orientasi tugas dengan pencapaian akademik(p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ganesh Kandasamy
author_facet Ganesh Kandasamy
author_sort Ganesh Kandasamy
title Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
title_short Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
title_full Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
title_fullStr Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak
title_sort hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di sekolah jenis kebangsaan tamil daerah kuala kangsar dan kinta utara, perak
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
publishDate 2019
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5598
_version_ 1747833211478605824
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:55982021-02-23 Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaian akademik di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil daerah Kuala Kangsar dan Kinta Utara, Perak 2019 Ganesh Kandasamy Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan dengan pencapaianakademik murid. Kajian ini juga bagi mengenal pasti jenis gaya kepimpinan yangdiamalkan oleh guru-guru besar sebagai pemimpin. Kajian ini dilaksanakan secara tinjauan yangmelibatkan 186 orang guru di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Daerah Kuala Kangsar danKinta Utara, Perak. Reka bentuk kajian kuantitatif dipilih untuk menjawab tiga persoalankajian dan dua hipotesis. Data gaya kepimpinan dikutip melalui soal selidik LBDQ12. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Manakala, datapencapaian sekolah diperoleh melalui Gred Purata Sekolah. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapathubungan yang signifikan di antara gaya kepimpinan orientasi tugas dengan pencapaian akademik(p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5598 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5598 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi AB. Majib B Salleh. (2008). Persepsi Guru-guru Terhadap Gaya Kepimpinan Guru Besar DiEmpat Buah Sekolah Rendah Di aerah Hulu Trengganu. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Abdul, G., Zakaria, N., Kamis, H., Mahalle, S., &Nawi, A. (2014). Leadership Style of ReligiousSchool Headmasters and Its Relationship to Academic Achievement in Brunei Darussalam.Asian Social Science Journal, 10(3).Abdullah, A. G., Pengajian, P., Pendidikan, I., & Pinang, P. (2005). Kepimpinantransformasi pengetua dan warga organisasi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 20, 5368.Adegbesan, S. O. (2013). Effect of principals leadership style on teachers attitude to work inogun state secondary schools, Nigeria. Journal of Distance Education, 14(January), 1429.Adeyemi, T. O. (2010). Principals leadership styles and teachers job performance in seniorsecondary schools in Ondo State , Nigeria. Journal of Education, 2(July), 8391.Adeyemi, T. O. (2013). Principals Leadership Styles and Student Academic Performancein Secondary Schools in Ekiti State , Nigeria. International Journal of AcademicResearch in Progressive Education and Ddevelopment, 2(1), 187198.Ahmad, J., & Boon, Y. (2011). Amalan Kepimpinan Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT) Di.Jurnal Edupres, 1(September), 323335.Angelides, P., Sawa, K., &Hajisoteriou, C. (2012). Leading Inclusion?: Special Teachersas Leaders in the Development of Inclusive Education. International Studies in Education Administration, 40(1), 7589.Antonio, D. M. S. (2008). Creating better schools through democratic school leadership.International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(March 2015), 4362.Arokiasamy, A. R. @, bin Abdullah, A. G. K., & Ismail, A. B. (2014). Correlationbetween cultural perceptions, leadership style and ICT usage by school principals in Malaysia.TurkishOnline Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 2740.Ayd?n, B. (2012). Transformational Leadership Behaviors of School Principals?: A QualitativeResearch Based on Teachers Perceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences,4(3), 581591.Aziz Yahya. (2007). Gaya Kepimpinan Guru Besar Dan Hubungannya Dengan Faktor-FaktorKepimpinan Di Sekolah Penerima Anugerah Sekolah Cemerlang Di Negeri Melaka. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Basri, M., Rusdi, M., & Samad, S. (2014). The effects of transformational leadershipon the teacher performance at senior high school, Maros Regency. International Journal ofAcademic Research, 6(5), 6166.Bateh, J. (2014). Academic Administrator Leadership Styles and the Impact on FacultyJob Satisfaction. Journal of Leadership Education, 3450.Begley, P. T., & Zaretsky, L. (2004). Democratic school leadership in Canadas public schoolsystems: professional value and social ethic. Journal of Educational Administration, 42,640 655.Bi, L., Ehrich, J., &Ehrich, L. C. (2012). Confucius as transformational leader: lessons for ESLleadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 26, 391402.Botha, R. J. N. (2010). Perceptions with Regard to the Responsibilities of School Principals in theDemocratic Management of South African Schools. International Journal of EducationAdministration, 2(3), 573587.Braunsberger, K., & Gates, R. (2009). Developing inventories for satisfaction and Likert scales ina service environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 23, 219225.Brinia, V. (2011). Female Educational Leadership in Primary Education in Greece: A Theoretical Framework Based on Experiences of Female School Leaders. InternationalStudies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration& Management (CCEAM)), 39(3), 3758.Budiman Bin Sahali. (2008). Pengaruh Gaya Kepimpinan Guru Besar Terhadap PenarafanSekolah Berdasarkan Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia ( SKPM): (Pengurusan danPentadbiran). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Charles, C. A. M. and C. M. (2008). Introduction to Educational Research (6th ed.).USA: Pearson.Clara Y.Young. (2007). Defining Parental Involvement?: Perception Of School Administrators.Education, 133(3), 291298.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research?: Planning, And Evaluating Quantitative Andqualitative Research (3rd ed.). Ohio,USA: Pearson.Dahar, M. A., Faize, F. A., Niwaz, A., Hussain, M. A., & Zaman, A. (2010).Relationship Between The Leadership Styles And Academic Achievement At The Secondary Stage InPunjab ( Pakistan ). International Journal Of Academic Research, 2(6), 458462.Deenmamode, L. (2012). Values at the Heart of School Leadership: An Investigation ofthe Impact of School Culture on School Leadership. The Internatioanal Journal of Learning, 18(7).Education, J. P. (2014). The Relationship Between Pupils Motivation And Their School Results FromPerspective Of. Journal Plus Education, 3743.Faizal A. Ghani, M. (2013). Development of effective school model for Malaysian school.International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 131142.Fancera, S. F., & Bliss, J. R. (2011). Instructional Leadership Influence on Collective TeacherEfficacy to Improve School Achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 349370.Ferguson, E. D. (2011). What Adlerians Consider Important for Communication and Decision- Makingin the Workplace: Mutual Respect and Democratic Leadership Style. Journal of IndividualPsychology, 67(4), 432437.Ghulam Abbas, javed I. (2012). Relationship between Transformational Leadership Style andInnovative Work Behavior in Educational Institutions. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 22(3).Gross, S. J., & Shapiro, J. P. (2013). The New DEEL (Democratic Ethical EducationalLeadership) and the Work of Reclaming a Progressive Alternative in Educational Administration formPreK-20. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9, 121.Hamedo?lu, M. A., Kantor, J., &Glay, E. (2012). The Effect of Locus of Control and Culture onLeader Preferences. International Online Journal of Education Sciences, 4(2), 319324.Hashim, C. N. (2009). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Berkesan BaharomMohamad, Phd. In ProsidingSeninarKepengetuaan (Pp. 119).Hess, M., & Johnson, J. (2010). Teacher perceptions of administrative support fordemocratic practice: Implications for leadership and policy. Academic Leadership, 8(2).Ibrahim, A., & Al-Taneiji, S. (2012). Principal leadership style, school performance,and principal effectiveness in Dubai schools. International Journal of Research Studies inEducation,2(1), 4154. doi:10.5861/ijrse.2012.86Inandi, Y., Tunc, B., &Gilic, F. (2013). School Administrators Leadership Styles and Resistanceto Change. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 196203. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-5/B.30Ismail, M. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. KUALA LUMPUR: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.Jack R. Fraenkel, N. E. W. and H. H. H. (2006). How To Design And Evaluate ResearchIn Education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Johansson, O. (2004). A democratic, learning and communicative leadership? Journal ofEducational Administration, 42, 697707.Jurek, S. J., &Scime, A. (2014). Achieving democratic leadership: A data-minedprescription. Social Science Quarterly, 95(1), 97110.kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. KPM.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025.KPM. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025.Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., &Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership stylesand culture on students achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of EducationalAdministration, 48, 218240.Lambeth, D. (2012). Academic Leadership Journal. Academic Leadership Journal, 9(4).Leadership Model: The Ohio State University Source: Boundless. Leadership Model: The Ohio StateUniversity. Boundless Management. Boundless, 08 Jun. 2016. Retrieved 12 Jul. 2016.(2016).Leithwood, K., &Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizationalconditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 112 129.Lingam, G. I., & Lingam, N. (2013). School Leaders Perceptions of their Performance?: The Caseof Solomon Islands. ISEA, 41(2), 7793.Liu, P. (2013). A Transformational School Leadership Model in Chinese Urban Upper Secondary Schools. ISEA, 41(3), 7395.Mamat, I. (1993). Kepimpinan sekolah (1st ed.). KUALA LUMPUR.Min, B. (2013). Evaluating the performance of academic improvement target schools in Korea.KEDI Journal of Education Policy, 1, 83104.Nash, W. (2011). Transformational School Leadership and Student Achievement?: A Case Study.National Teacher Education Journal.NorainiIdris. (2015). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). University Malaya.Ofoegbu, F. I., Clark, A. O., &Osagie, R. O. (2013). Leadership Theories and Practice?: Charting aPath for Improved Nigerian Schools, 41(2), 6777.Okoko, J. M., Scott, S., & Scott, D. E. (2014). International Journal of Leadership in Education?:Theory and Practice Perceptions of school leaders in Nairobi about their leadership preparation anddevelopment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, (April), 126.Pashiardis, P. (2004). Democracy and leadership in the educational system of Cyprus. Journal ofEducational Administration, 42, 656668.R.Freankel, N. E. W. and J. (2001). Educational Research: A Guide to The Process (2nd ed.). London:LEA Publisher.Reardon, R. M. (2011). Elementary School Principals Learning-Centered Leadership andEducational Outcomes: Implications for Principals' Professional Development. Leadership andPolicy in Schools, 10(1), 6383.Shriberg, D., Mcardle, L., & James, J. M. (2010). School Psychology Forum?: EffectiveLeadership Practice in School Psychology. School Psychology Forum.Sinnappa, S. A. (2014). Perbandingan tahap penggunaan BI dan BM dalam Pembelajaran danPengajaran Mata Pelajaran Sains dalam Kalangan Guru-guru Sains Daerah Gombak. Universiti PendidikanSultan Idris.Sitati, E. M., Ngaira, A. a, Mwita, C. W., Amolo, W., Akala, M. L., &Ngaira, W.(2006). Perception of District Quality Assurance and Standards Officers on Leadership Styles ofDistrict Education Officers in Kenya.Sitze, B. A. (2013). What Works. Taylor & Francis Ltd, (October).Springer, K. (2010). Educational Research?: A Contextual Approach.Strickland, E. A. V. (2011). Leadership Styles Of Higher Education Study Abroad Faculty?: AComparison Study Using The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire A Dissertation Submitted ToThe Graduate School In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Doctor OfEducation Ad. Ball State University.Tahseen, N. (2010). The Relationship between Principal s Leadership Style and TeacherOccupational Stress. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 4(2), 107125.Tatlah, I. A., Iqbal, M. Z., Amin, M., & Quraishi, U. (2014). Effect of Leadership Behaviour ofPrincipals on Students Academic Achievement at Secondary Level?: A Comparison of theLeaders and Teachers Perceptions. Journal Of Research and Reflection in Education, 8(1), 112.Terry, L. L. (1965). the Outlook in Health. District of Columbia Dental Society Journal. Districtof Columbia Dental Society, 40(164), 4547 PASSIM. doi:10.1002/ccVellymalay, S. K. N. (2012). The Impact of Parent s Socioeconomic Status onParental Involvement at Home?: A Case Study on High Achievement Indian Students of a Tamil Schoolin Malaysia.W.Best John. (1998). Research in Education (8th ed.). Boston: A Viacom Company.Yusof, A. M. (1989). Kepimpinan, Motivasi dan Prestasi: Model Guru dan Tentera. KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Abdul, G., Zakaria, N., Kamis, H., Mahalle, S., &Nawi, A. (2014). Leadership Style of ReligiousSchool Headmasters and Its Relationship to Academic Achievement in Brunei Darussalam.Asian Social Science Journal, 10(3). http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n3p112Abdullah, A. G., Pengajian, P., Pendidikan, I., & Pinang, P. (2005). KEPIMPINAN TRANSFORMASI PENGETUA DAN WARGA ORGANISASI PENDIDIKAN. JurnalPendidik Dan Pendidikan, 20, 5368.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research?: Planning, And Evaluating Quantitative Andqualitative Research (3rd ed.). Ohio,USA: Pearson.Hashim, C. N. (2009). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Berkesan. BaharomMohamad, PhD. In Prosiding SeminarKepengetuaan (pp. 119).Hushin, H. Bin, &Hussin, A. Bin. (2012). Hubungan kepuasan kerja guru-guru. Pendidikan, 3(2),121134.Ismail, M. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. KUALA LUMPUR: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.Master, E., & Leadership, T. (n.d.). Teacher leadership?: overcoming m am just ateacher syndrome, 363372.Mcfadden, C., & Hoover-, S. (1984). Leadership Styles and Moral Judgment Competence ofCommunity College Personnel, 6376.Ofoegbu, F. I., Clark, A. O., & Osagie, R. O. (2013). Leadership Theories and Practice?: Chartinga Path for Improved Nigerian Schools, 41(2), 6777.R.Freankel, N. E. W. and J. (2001). Educational Research: A Guide to The Process (2nd ed.).London: LEA Publisher.

Similar Items