Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach

Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach

The study illustrates children's digital practices in the Malaysian context. The 21 stcentury has witnessed an unprecedented expansion of and access to information forpeople who can use technology. Nowadays, information can be reached in the blinkof an eye and is accessible at our fingertips. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haslinda Hashim
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2017
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5679
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5679
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Haslinda Hashim
Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
description The study illustrates children's digital practices in the Malaysian context. The 21 stcentury has witnessed an unprecedented expansion of and access to information forpeople who can use technology. Nowadays, information can be reached in the blinkof an eye and is accessible at our fingertips. Since the 1990s, the internet revolutionhas helped people to search for information through their networked computers, andmobile gadgets have more recently made this even easier as people can carryinformation in their own pockets. However, this steady increase in internet usageand mobile device ownership, particularly among schoolchildren in Malaysia overthe last few years, has been creating fear, anxiety and frustration. Due to a moralpanic in Malaysia regarding children's online safety, to date the majority of theextant studies carried out in Malaysia are focusing on E-Safety instead of seeking adeeper understanding of the current digital practices among Malaysian children.Little research has been conducted to specifically investigate and understand theonline experience dimensions of Malaysian children's lives and social worlds. Thisdescriptive case-study based research explores a small group of Malaysian'children's digital practices and their management in the school (computer lab) andat home, and in both the communal area and personal spaces of the latter. Thisresearch examines five 16 year olds' engagements with online technology acrossformal and informal settings at school and at home using a mixed methodsapproach, specifically questionnaires, interviews, observations and focus groupdiscussion. The findings reveal that participating children enjoy online benefitsthrough a range of online activities with the usage of several digital devices. Thisstudy also provides insights into the roles and influences of parental, teacher, oldersiblings and peer mediation in developing children's digital literacy skills.Furthermore, children's perceptions of online opportunities and risks, and whatkind of learning is involved through their online activities are also analysed anddiscussed.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Haslinda Hashim
author_facet Haslinda Hashim
author_sort Haslinda Hashim
title Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
title_short Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
title_full Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
title_fullStr Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
title_full_unstemmed Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
title_sort digital practices at home and school: a case study approach
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate 2017
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5679
_version_ 1747833216023134208
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:56792021-03-18 Digital practices at home and school: a case study approach 2017 Haslinda Hashim LB Theory and practice of education The study illustrates children's digital practices in the Malaysian context. The 21 stcentury has witnessed an unprecedented expansion of and access to information forpeople who can use technology. Nowadays, information can be reached in the blinkof an eye and is accessible at our fingertips. Since the 1990s, the internet revolutionhas helped people to search for information through their networked computers, andmobile gadgets have more recently made this even easier as people can carryinformation in their own pockets. However, this steady increase in internet usageand mobile device ownership, particularly among schoolchildren in Malaysia overthe last few years, has been creating fear, anxiety and frustration. Due to a moralpanic in Malaysia regarding children's online safety, to date the majority of theextant studies carried out in Malaysia are focusing on E-Safety instead of seeking adeeper understanding of the current digital practices among Malaysian children.Little research has been conducted to specifically investigate and understand theonline experience dimensions of Malaysian children's lives and social worlds. Thisdescriptive case-study based research explores a small group of Malaysian'children's digital practices and their management in the school (computer lab) andat home, and in both the communal area and personal spaces of the latter. Thisresearch examines five 16 year olds' engagements with online technology acrossformal and informal settings at school and at home using a mixed methodsapproach, specifically questionnaires, interviews, observations and focus groupdiscussion. The findings reveal that participating children enjoy online benefitsthrough a range of online activities with the usage of several digital devices. Thisstudy also provides insights into the roles and influences of parental, teacher, oldersiblings and peer mediation in developing children's digital literacy skills.Furthermore, children's perceptions of online opportunities and risks, and whatkind of learning is involved through their online activities are also analysed anddiscussed. 2017 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5679 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5679 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Aagaard,1. (2016). Mobile devices, interaction, and distraction: a qualitativeexploration of absent presence. AI & Society, 31 (2), 223-231.https:lldoi.orgll0.1007/s00146-01S-0638-zAbdul Shukor, S. (2006). Protecting children's rights in the internet: Challenges apreliminary study based on the Malaysian experience. In 21st British & IrishLaw, Education ahd Technology Association Corference: Globalisation andHarmonisation in Technology Law. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bileta.ac.uklcontent/files/conference papers/2006IProtectingchildren's right in the internet - The Challenges. pdfAbidin, N. A. Z. (2017). Computer-based interactive games as learning aids. TheEnglish Teacher, 10. Retrieved from journals.melta.org.myAchterkamp, R., Hermens, H. 1., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R. (2016). Theinfluence of vicarious experience provided through mobile technology onself-efficacy when learning new tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 62,327-332Alabama State Department of Education. (1927). Report on illiteracy by Divisionof exceptional education. 1927. Birmingham Birmingham Printing Co.Retrieved from http://catalog.hathitrust. org/Record/00907S23 SAliagas, C. (201S). Schooled literacy in teenagers online writing. In Plane S,Bazerman C, Rondelli F, Donahue C, Applebee AN, Bore C, Carlino P,Marqui1l6 Larruy M, Rogers P, Russell D (Eds). Research on writing:multiple perspectives. International exchanges on the study ofwriting (pp.123-143). Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and CREMAliagas, C, & Margallo, A. M. (2017). Children's, responses to the interactivity ofstorybook apps in family shared reading events involving the iPaiCI. Literacy;5J(lt 44-52. https:lldoi_orglI0_l111IliU2089Alvarez, I, & Olivera-Smith, M. (2013). Learning in Social Networks: Rationaleand Ideas for Its Implementation in Higher Education Education Sciences,3(3),314-325. https:lldoi_orgll03390/educsci3030314Amichai-Hamburger, Y, & Etgar, S_ (2016). Intimacy and SmartphoneMultitasking=-A New Oxymoron? Psychological Reports. J 19(3),826-838.https:l/doi.org/10.1177J0033294116662658Anshari, M. Almunawar, M. N_, Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K_. & Hurla, 1M(2011). Srnartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?Education Gild In/ormation Technologies, 1-17 ..https:!/doi_orglI0_l007/510639-011-9512-1Appel, ?l, Stiglbauer, R, Batinic, R, & Holtz" P. (2014) Internet use and verbalaggression: The moderating role of parents and peers, Computers ill HumanBehavior, 33,235-24 L https:/ldoi_orgllO.J0I6Jj.cbb.20l4.. m_(ll((1Appleby. Yo. & Hamilton. M (2005) Literacy as social practice: Travellingbetween the everyday and other forms of learning. In P Sutherland, & JCrowther (Eds.), Lifelong learning : concepts and contexts. LondonRoutledge.Aragon, C. R.. Poon, S_ So. Monroy-Herrulndez, A. & Aragon" 0.. (2009). A tale IOftwo online communities: Fostering collaboration and creativity ill sciennstsand children. Proceedings ofthe Seventh ACM ConJereilce Oil CrreaJitiily andCognition, 9-18. 10.114511640233.1640239. Retrieved from https.z/dl-acmorg.sheffield. idm. oclc. org/citation. cfmrdoid= 164023 3 .1640239Arafeh, S. & Levin, D. (2003). The Digital Disconnect: The Widening GapBetween Internet-Savvy Students and Their Schools. In C. Crawford, N.Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds), Proceedings ofSITE 2003-SocietyforInformation Technology & Teacher Education InternationalConference (pp. 1002-1007) Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: Associationfor the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved Jan 29,2015 from https://v...wwlearntechlib.org/primary/p/180811.Aslanidou, S., & Menexes, G. (2008). Youth and the Internet: Uses and practicesin the home. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1375-1391.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.003Ramadan, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis [Powerpoint Presentation).Retrieved from http://slideplayer.comJsJide/6151802/Australian Curriculum [AC]. (2017). Literacy. Retrieved June 11, 2017, fromhttps://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-l O-curriculum/generalcapabilitieslliteracy/Austin, E. W., & Kistler, M. (2016). Family Mediation of Children'sMedia/Internet Use. The International Encyclopedia ofInterpersonalCommunication. 1-10. https//doi.org/ 10.1 002/9781118540190.wbeic245Avila, L, & Pandya, J. Z. (2013). Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis:Intersections and Challenges. New literacies and digital epistemologies.Volume 54. New York: Peter Lang.Baharudin, D. F., & Zakaria, M. Z. (2012). Adolescents and Internet SexAddiction: International conference on Appliedpsychology: Asianperspective on March 12-14, 20()Y. Retrievedfrom https://www.researchgate net/publicationJ280216181 ADOLESCENTS_AND_INTERNET_SEX_ADDICTION_byBaboo, S. B., Pandian, A., Prasad, N.V & Rao, A. (2013). Young people and newmedia in Malaysia: An analysis of social uses and practices. Journal qfArts,Science & Commerce, IV(2), 50-56.Balakrishnan, V (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: Theroles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior,46, 149-157. https://doi.org/lO.l 0 16/j.chb.20 15.01.021Balea, B. (2016). The role of smartphones in increasing digital and socialinequalities among Romanian children. Journal of Comparative Research inAnthropology and Sociology, 7(2), 1-20.Bansal, 1'., & Joshi, D. (2014). A study of students experiences ofWhatsAppmobile learning. Global Journal ofHuman-Social Science Research, 1 4(4).Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Localliteracies: reading and writing ill onecommunity. London: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved fromhttp://librarycontent.shefac.ukl20002137v05.pdfBarton, D. (2007). Literacy: an introduction to the ecology ofwritten language(2nd ed.). Malden, MA : Blackwell.Baynham, M., & Prinsloo, M. (2009). Introduction: The future of literacy studies.In: Baynham, M., & Prinsloo, M. (Eds.), Thefuture of literacy studies (pp.1-20). London: Palgrave MacmillanBazeley, P. & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with Nl/ivo. (2nd ed.).London: SAGE Publications.BBC Bitesize. (20 l7). Proprietary, free and open source software. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/education/guidesIz6r86sg/revisionl4Bennett, S., Maton, K, & Kervin, L (2008). The "Digital Natives" debate: Acritical review of the evidence. British Journal ofEducational Technology,39(5), 775-786. https://doi.orgIl0.llll/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.xBernama. (2016, December 9). Local animation companies' success makesMalaysia proud. The Malaysian Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/20 13/0 1/12/malaysian-team-behindspecial-effects-for-life-of-pi-and-snow-white-movieslBitsize (2017). Software concepts. BEC Retrieved 29 January, 2017, fromhttps:llwww.bbc.com/educationlguides/z6r86sglrevisionl4Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A R, & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencingdigital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education,77, 82-90. https://doiorgl1 0.1 0 16/j.compedu.20 14.04.0 13Bosman, 1., Bayraktar, F., & dHaenens, L (2015). Children's digital mediapractices within the European family home: Does perceived discriminationmatter? Journal ofChildren and Media, 9(1),77-94.https:lldoi.org/10.1080117482798.2015.997099Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instantmessaging between teachers and students. Journal ofInformationTechnology Education: Research, 13, 217-231.Boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? FirstMonday, 15(8).Braun, v., & Clarke, V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.https.z/doi.org/I 0.1 J 91114 78088706qp0630aBritish Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2011). British EducationalResearch Association (BERA) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.Retrieved 11 June, 2014, from https.z/www.bera.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/20 14/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-20 11. pdfBritto, II (2007). A study of young people's use ofICT in domesticenvironments: An activity theory perspective. (Doctoral thesis, University ofYork, United Kingdom). Retrieved fromhttp://etheses.whiterose.ac. ukl360 III 1440933. pdfBryant, V. (2013). 21 st century youth using critical thinking skills and practicingcyber safety when making digital decisions: An analysis of the digitaldevices and decisions of youth and parental perspectives of thesame (Doctoral dissertation, Fielding Graduate University). Retrieved fromhttps:l/eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563333Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Buchholz, A., Perry, B., Weiss, L B., & Cooley, D. (2016). Smartphone use andperceptions among medical students and practicing physicians. Journal ofMobile Technology in Medicine, 5(1), 27-32.Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining Digital Literacy. District Dispatch, 263-276.Retrieved 29 January, 2014, fromhttp://www . districtdispatch.org/20 I 2/04/defining-digital-literacylBulfin, S (2009). Literacies , new technologies and young people: Negotiatingthe interface in secondary school (Doctoral dissertation, Monash University)Retrieved fromhttps:lloportuguesdobrasil.files. wordpress.coml20 15/02/technology-inschool.pdfBulfin, S., & Koutsogiannis, D. (2012). New literacies as multiply placedpractices: expanding perspectives on young people's literacies across homeand school. Language and Education, 26(4), 331-346.https:l/doi.orgIl0.l080/09500782.2012.691515Bulfin, S., & North, S. (2007). Negotiating digital literacy practices across schooland home: Case studies of young people in Australia. Language andEducation. https:lldoi.orgIl0.2167/le750.0Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2016). Future scenarios for mobile science learning.Research in Science Education, 46(2), 287-308.Burnett, C. (2009). Research into literacy and technology in primary classrooms:An exploration of understandings generated by recent studies. Journal ofResearch in Reading, 32(1), 22-37. https:l/doi.orgl10.1111/j.1467-9817.200S.01379.xBurnett, C. (2013). Investigating pupils' interactions around digital texts: a spatialperspective on the "classroom-ness" of digital literacy practices in schools.Educational Review, 66(2), 192-209.https:lldoi.orgll0.1080/00131911.2013.768959Burnett, c., Merchant, G., Pahl, K., & Rowsell, 1. (2014). The (im)materiality ofliteracy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research.Discourse, 35(1),90-103. https://doiorgIlO 1080101596306.2012739469Byron, T. (2008) Seifer Children in a Digital World - The Report of the ByronReview .. Retrieved from www.dcsf.gov.uk/byronreviewCalvo-Porral, C, Faiiia-Medin, A, & Nieto-Mengotti, M. (2017). Exploringtechnology satisfaction: An approach through the flow experience.Computers in Human Behavior, 66,400-408.https://doi.org/10.1 0 16/j .chb 2016.10 008Carlson, D., & Schrader, A (2012). Dynamix: An open plug-and-play contextframework for android. In Internet of Things (lOT). 2012 3rd InternationalConference (pp. 151-158)Centre for Teaching Innovation. (2017). Blended Learning. Retrieved June] 1,2017, from https://www.cte.comeILedu/teaching-ideas/teaching-withtechnology/blended-learning.htmlChan, W. K (2016, January 7). Netflix now "live" in Malaysia - from onlyRM33 a month. Malay Mail Online. Retrieved fromhttp://www.themalaymailonline.com/tech-gadgets/article/get-ready-for-abig-productivity-drop-all-you-need-to-know-about-netflixgo#p7k6vECpeZ614B2R 97Chase, S. E (2007). Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. Collecting andinterpreting qualitative materials, 57(3), 651-679.Chaudron, S. (2015). Young Children (0-8) and Digital Technology: A qualitativeexploratory study across seven countries. (EUR-Scientific and TechnicalResearch Reports). Publications Office of the ED.https:lldoi.orgll0.2788/00749Cheok, M. L, Wong, S L, Ayub, A. F., & Mahmud, R. (2017). Teachers'perceptions ofE-learning in Malaysian secondary schools. Malaysian OnlineJournal ofEducational Technology, 5(2), 20-33.Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in theinternet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale.Computers & Education, 107.https:lldoi.org/http://dx.doi.org/l0.l 016/j.compedu.2017.01.002Chou, c., & Peng, H. (2011). Promoting awareness ofInternet safety in Taiwanin-service teacher education: A ten-year experience. The Internet and HigherEducation, 14(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/lO.l016/j.iheduc.2010.03.006Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 Blended LearningDisruptive? An Introduction to the Theory of Hybrids. Clayton ChristensenInstitute for Disruptive Innovation.Chuah, S., Marimuthu, M., & Ramayah, T. (Eds.) (2015). Wirelesstelecommunications industry in Malaysia: Trends, challenges, andopportunities. Consumption in Malaysia: Meeting ofNew Changes. Penang:Universiti Sains Malaysia Publisher.Ciccarelli, M., Chen, J. D., Vaz, S., Cordier, R., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Managingchildren's postural risk when using mobile technology at home: Challengesand strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 189-198.https.z/doi.org/Iu.l 0 16/j.apergo.20 15.04.003Cilesiz, S. (2012). Cybercafes and youth development. In Z. Yan (Ed.),Encyclopedia (if Cyber Behavior (pp. 422-432). United States of America:Information Science Reference (an imprint ofIGI Global).Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcomingchallenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist,26(2), 120-123. Retrieved from http://eprints uwe ac ukJ21155/3/Teachingthematic analysis Research Repository version. pdfClough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2012). A student's guide to methodology: justifyingenquiry. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Bell, R. (2013). Research Methods inEducation. Retrieved fromhttps:lIWW\.dawsonera.com:443/abstract/9780203720967Coleman,1. (2012). Introduction: Digital technologies in the lives of youngpeople. Oxford Review ofEducation, 38(1), 1-8.https:lldoi.orgIl0.1080103054985.2011.577937Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and thedesign ofsocialfutures. London: Routledge.Corbeil. J. R., Butler, 1. W., & Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2008). Faculty, are youready for mobile learning? E-learners say they are geared up and ready toengage. International Journal ofMobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1),48-61.Creswell. J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixedmethods research. (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Creswell, 1. W. (20l2a). Educational research: Planning, conducting, andevaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (4thed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W. (20 l2b). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing amongfive approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Creswell, 1. W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosingamongfive approaches. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Curry, D. L., Reeves, E., & Mcintyre, C. 1. (2016). Connecting schools andfamilies: Understanding the influence of home literacy practices. TexasJournal ofLiteracy Education, 4(2), 69-77.d'Haenens, L., & Tsaliki, L. (2012). Risks versus harm. Children's copingprofiles. In O. Brian, S. Elisabeth, & M. Sharon (Eds.), Towards a betterInternetjar children? Policy Pillars, Players and Paradoxes. Sweden:Nordicom. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/publikationer-helapdf/toward_ a_better_internet. pdfDavies, 1., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0for schools: learning and socialparticipation. (G. Merchant, Ed.). New York: Peter Lang.Davies, 1., & Merchant, G. (2014). Digital literacy and teacher education. In P.Benson & A. Chik (Eds), Popular culture, pedagogy and teacher education:International perspectives. New York: Routledge.Davies, 1. (2005). Literacies, nomads and tribes: On line meaning-making and thedevelopment of new literacies. In 1. Marsh & E. Millard (Eds.), Popularliteracies, childhood and schooling (pp. 160 - 175). London: Routledge.Davies, 1. (2008). Talking 'bout a (digital) Revolution: New Literacies, NewPractices for New Times. Journal ofEducation and Development in theCaribbean, 10(1),33-56. https:lldoi.org/10.1017/CB09781107415324.004Davies, 1. (2009). Online Connections, collaborations, chronicles and crossingsIn R. Willett, M. Robinson, & 1. Marsh (Eds.), Play, Creativity and DigitalCultures. London: Routledge.Davies, 1. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers &Education, 59(1), 19-29.Davies, J. (2014). (Im)material girls living in (im)material worlds: identitycuration through time and space. In C. Burnett (Ed.), Nell' literacies aroundthe globe: policy andpedagogy. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.Diaz, C. J. (2007). Literacy as social practice. Literacies in Childhood: ChangingVielt'S, Challenging Practice, 31-42.Dowdall, C. (2016). Children's writing in the twenty-first century: Mastery,crafting and control. In Parry, B., Burnett, c., & Merchant, G. (Eds ),Literacy, Media, Technology: Past, Present and Future.London:Bloomsbury.Drotner, K. (2007). Leisure is Hard Work: Digital Practices and FutureCompetencies. The John D. and Catherine T Mac/irthur Foundation Serieson Digital Media and Learning, 167-184.Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children'sinternet safety? EU Kids Online, London, UK Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.lse.ac.ukl42872/Eaton, 1. (1883). Illiteracy and its social, political and industrial effects. Anaddress delivered by invitation before the Union league club of New Yorkcity. New York: The Club. Retrieved fromhttp://catalog. hathitrust. org/Recordl0095 81234Edwards-Groves, c., & Langley, M. (2009). i-Kindy: Responding to hometechnoliteracies in the kindergarden classroom. Teacher Education, 35(1), 89-103Feng, Y." &- Xie, W. (2(OlU4) Teens' concern for privacy when using socialttlIdworlring saes: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships withprivacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(0). 153-162.. luttps:lldoi.orgflntp::lldx.. doi.orgllO_10161j.chb.2014_01.009Frechette.J, (2005).. Cyber-Democracy or Cyber-Hegemony ? Exploring thePolitical and Economic Structures of the Internet as an Alternative Source ofInformation" Library Trends 53(4),555-575.Freire, P. (1970). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom.Harvard Educational Review, 68(4),480,Freire. P. (1972). Cultural action/orfreedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2005). Literacy: Reading the word and the world.London: Routledge.Gaved, M, Collins, T., Mulholland, P., Kerawalla, L, Jones, A., Scanlon, E, .Clough, G. (2010). Using netbooks to support mobile learners' investigationsacross activities and places. Open Learning, 25(3), 187-200.Gayatri, G. (2014). Digital Citizenship and Safety among Children andAdolescents in Indonesia. Retrieved 10 November 2015 from , ,https://web.kominfo.go.id/sites/default/files/users/12/Kominfo-Presentasi%20Laporan%20Hasil%20Penelitian%20-%20Gati%20Gayatri. pdfGee, E., Takeuchi, L. M., Siyahhan, S., & Ellerbe, B. (2017). The influence ofsiblings on the digital media ecology of Latino children. In Gee, E.,Takeuchi, L., & Wartella, E. (Eds.), Children and Families in the DigitalAge: Learning Together in a Media Saturated Culture. New York:Routledge.Gee, 1. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses.London: Taylor & Francis.Gillen, J. & Barton, D. (2010). Digitalliteracies: A research briefing by thetechnology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning researchprogramme. Technology Enhanced Learning Programme. Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.ukl334711lIDigitaILiteracies.pdfGilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Given, L. M., Winkler, D. C, Willson, R., Davidson, C; Danby, S., & Thorpe, K.(2014). Documenting young children's technology use: Observations in thehome. Proceedings of the American Societyfor Information Science andTechnology, 51(1), 1-9. https://doi.orgllO.l002/meet,2014.14s05101028Global Village. (2016). Malaysia. Retrieved 29 March, 2015, fromhttp://globalvillage. world/proudly-asia/southeast -asia/malaysia!Goodfellow, R. (2011) Literacy, literacies and the digital in higher education.Journal of Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 131-144.https:l/doi.orgl1 0.1080113562517.2011.544125Grant, L. (2010). Connecting digital literacy between home and school. Bristol:Futurelab, BECTA.Grant, L. (2011). "Trn'a completely different person at home': using digitaltechnologies to connect learning between home and school. Journal ofComputer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 292-302.Greene. J. A, Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring criticalcomponents of digital literacy and their relationships with learning.Computers and Education, 76,55-69.https://doi.orgI10.1 0 16/j.compedu.20 14.03 .008Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2015). Social media and education:Reconceptualizing the boundaries offormal and informal learning.Learning, Media and Technology, 4.https:l/doi.org/10.1080117439884.2015.1064954Grey, A (2011). Cybersafety in early childhood education. Young Children,36(2), 77-82.Guan, S.-S. A, & Subrahmanyam, K (2009). Youth Internet use: risks andopportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22,351-356.https://doi.org/l0.1097/YCO.ObOI3e32832bd7eOGurung, B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of theirpersonal and educational digital engagement. Computers and Education, 77,91-100. https:!ldoi.orgI10.1016/j.compedu 2014.04.012Haddon, L. (2013). Mobile media and children. Mobile Media & Communication,1(1),89-95. https:!/doi.orgIl01177/2050157912459504Hague, Cassie; Payton, S. (2011). Digital literacy across the curriculum.Curriculum Leadership, 9( 1 0), 1-6.Hague, C.. & Payton, S. (2010). Digital Literacy Across the Curriculum: AFuturelab Handbook. Retrieved fromhttp://archive. futurelab. org. uk/resources/documents/handbooksldigital_Iiteracy.pdfHalverson, R., & Shapiro, R. Ben. (2012). Halverson, R., & Shapiro, B.(2012). Technologiesfor education and technologiesfor learners: HOH'information technologies are (and should be) changing schools. Retrievedfrom https:!lwebsite.education.wisc.edu/halverson/wpcontent/uploads/20 12112/021712-Tech-for-education-and-Iearners-copy pdfHamid, D. H. T. B. A. H., Omar, A. H. H., & Sariffudin, R. S. (2005). Aplikasiperisian Nvivo dalam analisis data kualitatif. Qualitative Conference, 1-18.Hammond, M., & Wellington, 1. (2012) Research methods: The key concepts.London: Routledge.Hanif, H. (2016). Helping as participation in an open online community: Anexploratory study. (Doctoral thesis, University of Warwick, UnitedKingdom). https:lldoi.org/10.13140IRG.2.1.1558.6165Hannon, P. (2000). Reflecting on literacy in education. London: PsychologyPress.Hargrave, A.M., & Livingstone, S. (2007). Ofcom's Submission to the ByronReview. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ofcom.org.ukl_datalassets/pdf_file/OO 16/360 16/byron_review.pdfHassan, 1., & Rashid, R. (2012). Ketagihan penggunaan internet di kalanganremaja sekolah tingkatan 4 di Bandaraya Johor Bahru. Journal of Technical,Vocational and Engineering Education, 6, 23-43.Healey, M. (2014). Developing Independent & Autonomous Learning. Retrievedfromhttps://federation.edu. au/_datalassets/pdf_file/0003/202791/Mick_Healey_Independent_Learning_Workshop_Handout_Doc. pdfHelsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U, Sagvari, B., & De Haan, 1. (2013).Opportunities, Risks, Harm and Parental Mediation. EU Kids Online,London, UK. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.ukl52023/Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Studentperceptions of 'useful' digital technology in university teaching andlearning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.Henderson, R. (2011). Classroom pedagogies, digitalliteracies and the homeschooldigital divide. International Journal ofPedagogies & Learning, 6(2),152-16l. Retrieved fromhttp://search. proquest. com!docview/ 1022283005 ?accountid= 13 828Hendriyani, Hollander, E., D'Haenens, L., & Beentjes, 1. (2014). Views onchildren's media use in Indonesia: Parents, children, and teachers.International Communication Gazette, 76(4-5),322-339. Retrieved fromhttp://gaz.sagepub. comlcontent!7 6/4- 5/3 22. abstractHennink, M., Hutter, 1., & Bailey, A (20 10) Qualitative research methods.London: SAGE PublicationsHinostroza, J. E., Ibieta, A I., Claro, M., & Labbe, C. (2015). Characterisation ofteachers' use of computers and Internet inside and outside the classroom:The need to focus on the quality Education and Information Technologies.https://doi.orgll0.1007/s10639-015-9404-6Hofstetter, F.T. (2005). Internet Literacies. Delaware: McGraw-HilI.Iglesias, E., & Larranaga, M. (2015). Children's perception of the parentalmediation of the risks of the Internet. Revista Latina de ComunicacionSocial, (70),49. Retrieved fromhttp://www.revistalatinacs.orgl070/paperil034-UP/04en.htmlIqbal, 1., Hardaker, G., Sabki, A A, & Elbeltagi, 1. (2014). The face of digitalliteracy for Muslim teenage girls: a comparative study of Bradford Muslimgirl schools. International Journal ofInclusive Education, (March 2015), 1-21. https://doi.orgll0.l 080113603116.20 14.895430Iszaidy, 1., Ahmad, R. B., Kahar, N. F., Rahman, M., & Yaakob, S. N. (2013). Aportable class Lecture Recording system for E-Iearning purpose: Proceedingof the IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), December 2-4, 2013Proceedings (pp. 52-57). Sarawak: Malaysia.https:lldoi.orgll0.1109/ICOS.2013.6735047Jacob, S. M., & Issac, B. (2014). The mobile devices and its mobile learningusage analysis. Retrieved 8 August, 2015, fromhttps://arxiv.orglpdfI1410,4375.pdfJewitt, C, Hadjithorna-Garstka, C, Clark, W., Banaji, S., & Selwyn, N. (2010).School use of learning platforms and associated technologies. Retrieved 11June, 2015, fromhttp://dera.ioe.ac.ukJ1485/l/becta_201 0_useoflearningplatforms_report. pdfJohnson, G. M. (2010). Young children's Internet use at home and school:Patterns and profiles. Journal ofEarly Childhood Research, 8(3), 282-293.https:lldoi.org/l0.11771l476718X10379783Jones, 1., & Park, Y. (2015). Virtual worlds: Young children using the Internet. InK. L. Heider & M. Renck Jalongo (Eds.), Young Children and Families inthe Information Age: Applications of Technology in Early Childhood. (Vol.10, pp. 3-13). London: Springer.Jones, s. (2014). "How people read and write and they don't even notice":everyday lives and literacies on a Midlands council state. Literacy, 48(2),59-65.Jones, S., & Lea, M. R. (2008). Digital Literacies in the Lives of UndergraduateStudents: Exploring Personal and Curricular Spheres of Practice. ElectronicJournal ofEsleaming, 6(3),207-216.Kamalludeen, R. M., Hassan, A, & Nasaruddin, N. S. A (2017). Student UsagePatterns of Vie-Frog. Journal ofPersonalized Learning, 2(1), 86-94.Kumpulainen, K. & Gillen, 1. (2017) Young Children's Digital Literacy Practicesin the Home: A Review ofthe Literature. Retrieved from http://digilitey.euKarlsson, M.; Penteriani, G.; Croxson, H.; Stanek, A; Miller, R; Perna, D.; &Chitiyo, F. (2017). Accelerating affordable smartphone ownership inemerging markets. Retrieved from https:!/wwwgsma.com!mobilefordevelopment/wpcontent/uploads/20 17/07/accelerating-affordable-smartphone-ownershipemerging-markets-2017.pdfKatyal, K. R., & Evers, C. W. (2004). Teacher leadership and autonomous studentlearning: Adjusting to the new realities. International Journal of EducationalResearch, 41, 367-382.Kent, N., & Facerw, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of youngpeople's home and school leT use. Journal ofComputer Assisted Learning,20(6),440-455. https://doi.org/JO 1111lj.1365-2729.2004.00102.xKirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children's internet use in differentEuropean countries. Journal ofChildren and Media, 3(4), 394-409.https:!/doi.org/10.1080117482790903233440"Kolikant, Y. B.-D. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students' beliefs abouthow the Internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in HumanBehavior, 26(6), 1384-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012Kosnik, c., & Dharamshi, P. (2016). Intertwining digital technology and literacymethods courses. In Kosnik, c. White, S., Marshall, B., Goodwin, A. L., &Murray, 1. (Eds.), Building bridges: rethinking literacy teacher education ina digital era. (pp. 163-180). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Koutsogiannis, D. (2009). Discourses in researching children's digital literacypractices: Reviewing the "home/school mismatch hypothesis". InKoutsogiannis, D. & Arapo- poulou, M. (Eds.), Literacy, new technologiesand education: Aspects ofthe local and global (pp. 207-230). Thessaloniki:Zitis.Ktoridou, D., Eteokleous, N, & Zahariadou, A. (2012). Exploring parents' andchildren's awareness on internet threats in relation to internet safety.Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(3), 133-143.https:lldoi.org/l0.1108110650741211243157Lahtinen, H. 1. (2012). Young people's lCT role at home-a descriptive study ofyoung Finnish people's lCT views in the home context. Quality andQuantity, 46(2), 581-597. https:lldoi.org/lO.l007/s11135-010-9409-6Lankshear, c., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies : concepts, policies andpractices. Oxford: Peter Lang.Lankshear, C. (2003). New literacies : changing knowledge and classroomlearning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital literacy and Digitalliteracies:Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic JournalofDigital Literacy, 1(1), 12-24.Lantzy, 1. E. (2008). Protecting Children in Cyberspace: A Higher Education CaseStudy. (Doctoral thesis, George Mason University, United States). Retrievedfrom http://digilib.gmu.edu/dspacelhandleIl920/3381Lauricella, A. R., Cingel, D. P., Blackwell, c., Wartella, E., & Conway, A.(2014). The Mobile Generation: Youth and Adolescent Ownership and Useof New Media. Communication Research Reports, 31(4), 357-364.https:l/doi.org/l0.l080/08824096.2014.963221Lay-Yee, K. L., Kok-Siew, H., & Yin-Fah, B. C. (2013). Factors affectingsmartphone purchase decision among Malaysian generation Y. InternationalJournal ofAsian Social Science, 3(12), 2426-2440.Lea, M. R., & Jones, S (2011). Digitalliteracies in higher education: exploringtextual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education 36(4), 377-393. https://doi.orgIl0.l080103075071 003664021Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. 1. (2016). A design framework for enhancingengagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it.Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707-734.Leighton, L. 1., & Crompton, H. (2017). Augmented Reality in K-12 Education. InKurubacak, G., & Altinpulluk, H. (Eds.), Mobile Technologies andAugmentedReality in Open Education (pp. 281-290). Hershey PA: IGI Global.Lemphane, P., & Prinsloo, M. (2014). Children's digital literacy practices Il1unequal South African settings. Journal of Multilingual and MulticulturalDevelopment, 35(7), 738-753. https.z/doi.org/I 0.1080101434632.2014.908894Lenhart, A, (2015). Teens, Social Media, and Technology Overview 2015.Retrieved from http://www. pewinternet.orgl20 15/04/09/teens-social-mediatechnology-20 15/Lenhart, A, Purcell, K, Smith, A, & Zickuhr, K (2010). Social Media & MobileInternet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.orgiReports/201 O/Social-Media-and-YoungAdults.aspxLeung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). The influences of information literacy, internetaddiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media & Society, 14(1),117-136. https://doi.orgllO.11771l461444811410406Levy, R, Yamada-Rice, D., & Marsh, 1. (2013). Digital Literacies in the PrimaryClassroom. In K Hall (Ed.), International handbook ofresearch on children's literacy, learning, and culture. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Levy, R (2008). "Third spaces" are interesting places: Applying "third spacetheory" to nursery-aged children's constructions of themselves as readers.Journal ojEarly Childhood Literacy, 8(1),43-66.https://doi.orgll0 1177/1468798407087161Levy, R. (2009). "You have to understand words ... but not read them": youngchildren becoming readers in a digital age. Journal ojResearch in Reading,32(1), 75-91. https://doi.orgll0.llll/j.1467-9817.2008.01382.xLevy, R. (2011a). Young children, digital technology and interaction with text. InM. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives; Youngpeople, technology,and the new literacies. New York: Routledge.Levy, R. (2011b). New technologies in the primary classroom. In J. R. Moyles, J.Georgeson, & J. Payler (Eds.), Beginning teaching, beginning learning: inearly years andprimary education. (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-HillOpen University Press.Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digitallearning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal ofMathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.Lin, W.-Y., Hope Cheong, P, Kim, Y.-c., & lung, J.-Y. (2010). Becomingcitizens: Youths' civic uses of new media in five digital cities in East Asia.Journal ojAdolescent Research, 25(6), 839-857.https://doi.orgllO.1177/0743558410371l25Lindebaum, D. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic Motivations: Classic definitions andnew directions. Academy ojManagement Learning and Education, 8(2),225-237. https.z/doi.org/IO. J 006/ceps.1999.1 020Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. (2005). Internet literacy amongchildren and young people: Findings/rom the UK Children Go Onlineproject. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.ukl397/Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L (2008). Risky experiences for children online:Charting European research on children and the Internet. Children & Society,22(4), 314-323. https://doi.orgI10.11111j.l099-0860.2008.00157.xLivingstone, S., & Haddon, L (2009). EU Kids Online: Final report 2009.Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.ukl24372/Livingstone, S., Haddon, L, Vincent, 1., Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K (2014).Net children go mobile: The UK report LSE: EU Kids Online.Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children,young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 9(4),671-696.https://doi.org/l0.117711461444807080335Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks inteenagers' use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet selfefficacy.New media & society, J 2(2),309-329.https://doi.org/l0.117711461444809342697Livingstone, S., Marsh, L, Plowman, L, & Fletcher-watson, B. (2015). Youngchildren (0-8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory study -National report -UK Luxemborg : Joint Research Centre, EuropeanCommission.Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K (2014). Children's online risksand opportunities: Comparative findings/rom EU Kids Online and Net Children Go Mobile Executive summary. LSE London: EU Kids Online.Lobe, Bojana, Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, L. (2007). Researching children'sexperiences online across countries: issues andproblems in methodology.LSE London: ED Kids Online.Lobe, B., Livingstone, S., Olafsson, K., & Simoes, 1. A (2008). Best practiceresearch guide: How to research children and online technologies. LSELondon: ED Kids-Online.Luptakova, G., & Antala, B. (2017). Collaborative learning with application ofscreen-based technology in physical education. Montenegrin Journal ofSports Science and Medicine, 6(2), 49-56.Malaysian Investment Development Authority. (2015). The baseline profitabilityindex 2015 ranks Malaysia 6th most attractive investment destination in theorld. Retrieved from http://www.mida.gov.my/home/2585/news/thebaseline-profitability-index- 20 15-ranks-malaysia-6th-most-attractiveinvestment-destination-in-the-world/Manches, A, Duncan, P., Plowman, L., & Sabeti, S. (2015). Three questionsabout the Internet of things and children. TechTrends, 59(1), 76-83.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0824-8Marsh, 1. (2011). Young Children's Literacy Practices in a Virtual World:Establishing an Online Interaction Order. Reading Research Quarterly,46(2), 101-118.Marsh, 1. (2012). Countering chaos in club penguin: Young children '05' literacypractices in a virtual world. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096468Marsh, 1. (2014). Young Children's Online Practices: Past, Present and FutureJackie Marsh, University of Sheffield, UK Paper presented at the LiteracyResearch Association Conference, Marco Island, USA, 3,1-19.Marsh, J. (2015). "Unboxing" videos: co-construction of the child ascyberflaneur. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics ofEducation, 1-12.https://doi.orgIl0.1080101596306.2015.1041457Marsh, J., Brooks, G., Hughes, J., Ritchie, L., Roberts, S., & Wright, K. (2005).Digital beginnings: Young children's use of popular culture, media and newtechnologies.Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. (2015). Young children'sinitiation into family literacy practices in the digital age. Journal ofEarlyChildhood Research. https://doi.org/10.117711476718X15582095Martin, N., & Rice, J. (2012). Children's cyber-safety and protection in AustraliaAn analysis of community stakeholder views. Crime Prevention andCommunity Safety, 14(3), 165-181. https:lldoi.org/lO.1057/cpcs.2012.4Martinez de Morentin, J. I., C0I1es, A, Medrano, c., & Apodaca, P (2014).Internet use and parental mediation: A cross-cultural study. Computers &Education, 70,212-221. https://doi.orgIl0.1016/j.compedu.2013 07.036Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A (2014). Net Children Go Mobile: Final Report(with countryfact sheets). LSE London: ED Kids Online.Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K. (2015). The mobile Internet: Access, use,opportunities and divides among European children. New Media & Society.https://doi.org/10.11771l461444814567986Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K. (2014). Risks and opportunities. LSE London:ED Kids Online.Matthews, T., Liao, K., Turner, A., Berkovich, M., Reeder, R., & Consolvo, S.(2016). She'lljust grab any device that's closer: A Study qfEveryday Device& Account Sharing in Households: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conferenceon Human Factors in Computing Systems. Retrieved fromhttps://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858051Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applicationseducation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.McQuillan, H., & d'Haenens, L. (2009). Young people online: gender and ageinfluences. In S. Livingstone and L. Haddon, Kids online: Opportunitiesand risksfor children Bristol: The Policy Press.McCree, N., & Daykin, M. (2017). Writing and Reporting Case Studies.Retrieved 26 January, 2017, from http://creativeandcredible.co.uklwpcontent/uploads120 15/07ICreativeCredible_ Writing-and-reporting-casestudies.pdfMendoza, K. (2013). Protection And Empowerment: Exploringparents' use ofInternet mediation strategies with preteens. (Doctoral thesis, TempleUniversity, United States). Retrieved fromhttp://digital.library. temple.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p24580 I coll l 0lid/222156Merchant, G. (2015). Apps, adults and young children: researching digital literacypractices in context. In Jones, R. H., Chik, A and Hafner, C. A, (Eds.)Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digitalage '. Abingdon : Routledge,Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). A National Survey Report 2013 SafetyNett: Growing Awareness among Malaysian School Children on StayingSafe Online. Retrieved fromhttps.r/digi.cybersafe. nry!.files/articleIDiGi_SurveyBooklet_ COMPLli'! 'Epd]Ministry of Education Malaysia [MOE]. (2017). Malaysia Education Blueprint2013-2025. Retrieved September 15, 2017, fromhttp://www.padu.edu.my/blueprintMinistry of Education Malaysia. (2014). Capacity building Among malaysianschoolchildren on staying safe online. Retrieved fromhttps:!/digi.cybersafe.my/files/article/CyberSAFE_Survey _ Report_20 14. pdfMinistry of Education Malaysia. (201Sa). Growing Digital Resilience amongMalaysian Schoolchildren on Staying Safe Online. Retrieved fromhttps:!/digi.cybersafe.my/files/article/CyberSAFE_Survey_Report_2015_en.pdfMinistry of Education Malaysia. (20 15b). Skim Latihan Akademik Bumiputra(SLAB) /Skim Latihan Akademik IPTA (SLAI). Retrieved fromhttp://www.moe.gov.my/v/skim-latihan- akademikMinistry of Education Malaysia. (2015c). Statistik. Retrieved fromhttp://www.moe.gov.my/v/StatistikMisra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: thequality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices.Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298.Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning onindividual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers andEducation, 82, 11-25. https:lldoi.orgll0.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025Moore, T (2013) Critical thinking: seven definitions in search of a concept,Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 506-522.https://doi.org/l0.1 080103075079.2011.586995Mouza, c, Yang, H., Pan, y-c., Ozden, S. Y, & Pollock, L (2017)' Resettingeducational technology coursework for pre-service teachers: Acomputational thinking approach to the development of technologicalpedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australasian Journal ofEducational Technology, 33(3).Mutlu, T. (2016). Understanding Students' and Teachers' Approaches to TabletUse in Turkish Secondary Schools: A Model Based Approach. (Doctoralthesis, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom). Retrieved fromhttp.z/etheses.whirerose.ac. uk/158361O'Brien, D., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital Literacies Go to School: Potholes andPossibilities. Journal ofAdolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66-68.https:lldoi.org/lO.1598IJAAL.52.1.7O'Neill, B. 0., & Dinh, T. (2012). Digital Literacy, Digital Opportunities DigitalLiteracy, Digital Opportunities, 2(2), 0-8.O'Neill, B. 0., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Final recommendationsfor policy,methodology and research Final recommendationsfor policy, methodologyand research. London. Retrieved from http://eprints.les.ac.ukl394101O'Neill, B. and Staksrud, E. (2014). Final recommendationsfor policy. LSELondon: EU Kids Online.Ofcom. (2014). Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. Ofcom.Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uklbinaries/researchlmedialiteracy/media-use-attitudes- 141Childrens_ 2014_Report. pdfOffice of The Prime Minister of Malaysia. (2017) State Governments. RetrievedOctober 13,2016, fromhttp://www.pmo.gov.my/home. php?menu=page&page= 1671Olafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (20 13a). Children's Use of OnlineTechnologies in Europe. A review of the European evidence base. LSELondon: EU Kids Online.Olafsson, K., Livingstone, S, & Haddon, L. (2013b). How to research childrenand online technologies? Frequently asked questions and best practice. LSELondon: EU Kids Online.Omar, A. (2017). Permainan Mudah Alih dan Kanak-kanak. IDEALOGY, 2(1).Retrieved fromhttp://idealogyjournal.comlojs/index.php/idealogy/article/view/17Omar, S. Z., Daud, A., Hassan, M. S., Bolong, 1., & Teimmouri, M. (2014).Children Internet Usage: Opportunities for Self Development. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 75-80.https://doi.orgI10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.259Oxford Dictioneries. (2015). Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oxforddictionaries.comldefinition/english/riskPalmer, E., Lomer, S., & Bashliyska, 1. (2017). Overcoming barriers to studentengagement with Active Blended Learning. University ofNorthampton,Institute for Learning & Teaching, 1-12.Park, y. 1. (2014). My whole world's in my palm! The second-level divide ofteenagers' mobile use and skill. New Media & Society, 17(6),977-995.doi: 10.117711461444813520302Parliament of Malaysia. (2015). History Of Parliament Of Malaysia. Retrievedfrom http://www.parlimen.govmy/Pathak-Shelat, M., & DeShano, C. (2013). Digital youth cultures in small townand rural Gujarat, India. New Media & Society, i6(6), 983-1001.hUps://doi.org/l0.117711461444813496611Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.).California. : SAGE Publications.Paus-Hasebrink, 1., Bauwens, J., Durager, A., & Ponte, C. (2013). ExploringTypes of Parent-Child Relationship and Internet use across Europe. JournalofChildren and Media, 7(1), 114-132https://doi.orgI10.1080117482798.2012.739807Pennsylvania, B., Castle, E., W. A. (1938). Pennsylvania program of literacy andcitizenship educaton. Pennsylvania: Dunlap Printing Company. Retrievedfrom http://catalog.hathitrust.orgiRecord/006583259Performance Management and Delivery Unit Malaysia. (2015). EconomicTransformation Programme. Retrieved July 1,2015, fromhttp://etp.pemandu.gov.my/Plowman, L. (2015). Researching Young Children's Everyday Uses ofTechnology in the Family Home. interacting with Computers, 27(1), 36-46.https://doi.orgl1 0 1093/iwcliwu031Ponciano, L. (2014). Creating a Home-School Connection in Early ChildhoodThrough Technology: Parent Engagement and ABCmouse. com. In SOCietyfor Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference(pp. 1920-1926). Association for the Advancement of Computing inEducation (AACE).Potter, W. 1. (2013). Review of literature on media literacy. SOciology Compass,7(6),417-435.Powell, A, Watson, 1., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., .. Verma, S.(2015). Blending Learning The Evolution of Online and Face-to-FaceEducation from 2008-2015. Promising Practices in Blended and OnlineLearning Series. International Associationfor K-12 Online Learning.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. all the Horizon, 9(5), J--6. https://doi.org/10.11081l0748120110424816Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the Natives. Best ofEducational Leadership,63(Summer 2006),20-23. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascd.org/publications/educationalleadership/summer06/voI63/numl0IListen-to-the-Natives.aspxPusey, P., & Sadera, W. A (2011). Cyberethics, Cybersafety, and CybersecurityPreservice Teacher Knowledge, Preparedness, and the Need for TeacherEducation to Make a Difference, 28(2), 82-88.Rahimi, E., Van den Berg, 1., & Veen, W. (2014). A pedagogy-driven frameworkfor integrating Web 2.0 tools into educational practices and building personallearning environments. Journal ofLiteracy and Technology, 15 (2), 2014.Rambe, P., & Chipunza, C (2013). Using mobile devices to leverage studentaccess to collaboratively-generated resources: A case ofWhatsApp instantmessaging at a South African University. In 2013 International Conferenceon Advanced leT and Education (ILAICIE-13). Atlantis Press.Raymond, 1. (2013). World's Healthiest Foods: Kimchi (Korea). Health.Retrieved 13 October, 2016, fromhttp://www.health.comlhealthJarticle/0.. 2041 0300,00.htmlRheingold, H. (2014). The peeragogy handbook Pierce Press and PubDomEd.Retrived fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.664.1191&rep=repl&type=pdfRibble, M. (2009a). Passport to digital citizenship: Journey toward appropriatetechnology use at school and at home. Learning & Leading with Technology,36(4),14-17.Ribble, M. (2009b). Raising a Digital Child: A Digital Citizenship HandbookforParents (l st ed.). Oregon: International Society for Technology inEducation.Ribble, M. (2011). Digital Citizenship in Schools (2nd ed.). Oregon: InternationalSociety for Technology in Education.Rice, D. Y., Levy, R. (2013). ORiM Digital: Capitalising on the affordance ofdigital technology within ORiMframework. [Research Commitee FundingApplication Form]. Sheffield.Richards, L. (1999). Using Nl/ivo in qualitative research. London: SAGEPublications.Romero, M. (2014). Digital literacy for parents of the 21 st century children.el.earning Papers, 1-9. Retrieved fromhttp://www . openeducationeuropa. eu/en!elearning_papersRowsell, 1. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digitalage. London: Routledge.Saruji, M. A. M., Hassan, N. H, & Drus, S. M. (2017) Impact oftct andelectronic gadget among YOllng children in education: a conceptual model.In Zulikha, J. & N. H. Zakaria (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th InternationalConference on Computing & Informatics (pp. 480-486). Retrieved fromhttp://icoci.cms.net.myIPROCEEDINGS/2017/Pdf_Version_Chap0geIPID 165-480-486e. pdfSasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky onlinebehavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32-38.https://doi.orgIl0.l016/j.chb.2013.12.025Scribner, Sylvia, Cole, M. (1981). the psychology of literacy. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, O. (2009). Reviewing approaches andperspectives on "Digital Literacy." Pedagogies: An International Journal,4(2),107-125. https://doi.orgIl0.l0801l5544800902741556Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings,61(4),364-379. https://doi.org/l0.110S/00012530910973776Selwyn, N., Banaji, S., Hadjithoma-Garstka, c., & Clark, W. (2011). Providing aplatform for parents? Exploring the nature of parental engagement withschool learning platforms. Journal ofComputer Assisted Learning, 27(4),314-323.Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. F. (2017). Left to their owndevices: the everyday realities of one-to-one classrooms. Oxford Review ofEducation, 43(3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305047Sharples, M., Graber, R., Harrison, C; & Logan, K. (2009) E-safety and Web 2 .o for children aged 1 I - 16. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 70-84. https://doi.orgI10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00304.xShin, S. (2015). Teaching Critical, Ethical and Safe Use ofIct in Pre-ServiceTeacher Education, 19(1), 181-197. Retri eyed fromhttp://llt.msu.edulissues/february2015/shin.pdfShin, W., & Ismail, N. (2014). Exploring the role of parents and peers in youngadolescents' risk taking on social networking sites.https://doi.orgI10.I089/cyber.2014.0095Shute, V. 1., Sun, c., & Asbell-Clarke, 1. (2017). Demystifying computationalthinking. Educational Research Review, (22), 142-158.Siibak, A, & Vinter, K. (2010). Making Sense of the Virtual World for YoungChildren: Estonian Pre-School Teachers' Experiences and Perceptions.Journal For Virtual Worlds Research; 3(2). Retrieved fromhttps://journaJs.tdl.org/jvwr/index.php/jvwr/articJe/view!1892Skwigly (2014). Hollywood Talents Join Animated Malaysian Feature Film.Skywigly Animation Magazine. Retrieved fromhttp://www. skwigl y. co. uk/hoIlywood-talents-join-anirnated- malaysianfeature-film/Slomanson, W. R. (2014). Blended learning: A flipped classroom experiment.Journal ojLegal Education, 64( 1), 93-102.Smahel, D., & Wright, M. F. (2014). The meaning ojonline problematicsituationsfor children - Results ojqualitative cross-cultural investigation innine European countries. LSE London: EU Kids Online.Soh, P. c.R., Chew, K. W., Koay, K. Y, & Ang, P. H. (2017). Parents vs peers'influence on teenagers' Internet addiction and risky online activities.Telematics and Informatics https://doi.orgI10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.003Soldatova, G., & Zotova, E. (2013) Coping with Online Risks: The experience ofRussian schoolchildren. Journal of Children & Media, 7(1),44-59.https://doi.orgll0.1080117482798.2012.739766Sonck, N., & de Haan, 1. (2013) How The Internet Skills Of European 11- To 16-Year-Olds Mediate Between Online Risk And Harm Journal of Children &Media, 7(1),79-95. https://doi.org/101080117482798.2012.739783Sonck, N., & de Haan, 1. (2014). Safety by Literacy? Rethinking the Role ofDigital Skills in Improving Online Safety In S. van der Hof, B. van den. Berg, & B. Schermer (Eds.), Minding Minors Wandering the Web:Regulating Online Child Safely SE - 5 (Vol. 24, pp. 89-104). T.M.C. AsserPress. https://doi.orgll0 1007/978-94-6265-005-3_5Sonck; N., Livingstone, S., Kuiper, E., & de Haan, 1. (2011). Digital literacy andsafety skills, (July), 1-4. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.ukl33733/Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S (2009). Children and online risk: powerlessvictims or resourceful participants? LSE London: EU Kids Online.Steyn, 1., & Van Greunen, D. (2015). JCTsfor inclusive communities indeveloping societies. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Stirling, E. (2014). Why waste your time 017 Facebookr: A temporal analysis offirst-year undergraduate students and transition in UK Higher Education.(Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UnitedKingdom.Street, B. (2006). Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: Approachesfrom New Literacy Studies. Media Anthropology Network, 17, 1-15.Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implicationsfor language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1-24.https:lldoi.orgl1 0.10 16/S0898-5898(99)80 1 03-XStordy, P. (2012). Undergraduates' Internet literacies. (Doctoral thesis, Universityof Sheffield, United Kingdom). Retrieved fromhttp://etheses.whiterose.ac.ukJI499711/555131.pdfSzwed, 1. P. (1981). Chapter 1: The Ethnography of Literacy. In W. Marcia Farr(Ed.), Writing: the nature, development, and teaching ofwrittencommunication. Vol 1, Variation in writing: junctional and linguisticculturaldifferences (p. 16). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is ChangingYour World USA: McGraw-HilLTeimouri, M., Hassan, M. S., Bolong, L, Daud, A, Yussuf, S., & Adzharuddin, N.A. (2014). What is Upsetting Our Children Online? Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences, 155(October), 411-416.https:lldoi.org/l0.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.314Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2016). Family digital literacy practices andchildren's mobile phone use. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(DEC), 1-11.https:lldoi.org/l0.3389/fpsyg.2016.01957Tsatsou, P., Pruulmann- Vengefeldt, P., & Murru, M.P. (2009). Digital divides. InS Livingstone and L Haddon, Kids online: Opportunities and risksforchildren. Bristol: The Policy Press.TheCookinKids's channel. (2012, November 23). Welcome to The Cookin' KidsChristmas Cupcakes. Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgiI60-hZaATobin. R. (2010).Theodotou, E. (2017). Literacy as a social practice in the early years and theeffects of the arts: a case study. International Journal ofEarly YearsEducation, 25(2), 143-155. https://doi.orgIl0.l080/09669760.2017.1291332Ting, Y. L. (2015). Tapping into students' digital literacy and designingnegotiated learning to promote learner autonomy. The Internet and HigherEducation, 26(Supplement C), 25-32.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1 0 16/j.iheduc.2015.04.004Tobin, R. (2010). Descriptive Case Study. In Encyclopedia of Case Study. Research. (pp. 289-290). SAGE Publications.https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/l0.4135/9781412957397Tourism Malaysia. (2014). About Malaysia. Retrieved January 29,2015, fromhttp://www.tourism.gov.my/Tynes, B. M. (2007). Internet Safety Gone Wild?: Sacrificing the Educational andPsychosocial Benefits of Online Social Environments. Journal ofAdolescentResearch, 22(6), 575-584. https://doi.orgIl0.1177/0743558407303979UNICEF Malaysia. (2014). Exploring The Digital Landscape In Malaysia: Accessand lise ofdigital technologies by children and adolescents. Retrieved 29January, 2015, fromhttps://www.uniceforg/malaysialUNICEF_Digital_Landscape_in_ Malaysia-FINAL-Iowres.pdfVaJcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B, & Rots, I (2010). Internet parenting stylesand the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers &Education, 55(2), 454-464. https://doi.orgI10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009Valentine, G., Marsh, J., & Pattie, C. (2005). Children and young people's homeuse of ICT for educational purposes: The impact on attainment at key stages1-4, 1-106. Retrieved fromhttps://www.education.gov.uklpublications/eOrderingDownloadIRR672.pdfValkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents:an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. The Journal ofAdolescent Health: Official Publication of the Societyfor AdolescentMedicine, 48(2), 121-7. https://doi.orgI10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Courtois, c., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). InternetSkills, Sources of Support, and Benefiting From Internet Use. InternationalJournal ofHuman-Computer Interaction, 30(4), 278-290.https://doi.org/10.1080110447318.2013.858458Vincent, J. (2015). Mobile Opportunities Exploring positive mobile mediaopportunitiesfor European children. LSE London: EU Kids Online.Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: contemporary issues and practicalapproaches. London: Continuum.Wellington, J. (2005). Succeeding with Your Doctorate [electronic resource). (A.M.Bathmaker, C. Hunt, G. McCulloch, & P. Sikes, Eds.), Succeeding WithYour Doctorate. London: London: SAGE Publications.https://doi.org/hUp://dx.doi.org.sheffield.idm.oclc. orgl1 0.413 5/9781849209977Wellington, 1. (2015). Educational research: contemporary issues andpractical approaches (2nd ed.). London; New York: Bloomsbury AcademicWhite, 1. W (2009). Reading "the Word and the World": The Double-EdgedSword of Teaching Critical Literacy. Voices From the Middle, 17(2),55-57.Retrieved fromhttp://search. pro quest. comldocview/213930220?accountid= 13 828Wihlborg, E., & Hansson, P.-O. (2011). Internet cafe as a supportive educationalarena: a case study from the urban slum ofKibera, Nairobi, Kenya. InINTE.,J) 2011, International Technology, Education and DevelopmentConference, 7-9 March. Valencia, Spain.Wohlwend, K E. (2015). One Screen, Many Fingers: Young Children'sCollaborative Literacy Play With Digital Puppetry Apps and TouchscreenTechnologies. Theory Into Practice, 54(2), 154-162.https:!ldoi.org/10.1080100405841.2015.1 0 1 083 7Wok, S., & Mohamed, S. (2017). Internet and Social Media in Malaysia:Development, Challenges and Potentials. In The Evolution ofMediaCommunication. In'Tech. https:!ldoi.org/l0.5772/intechopen.68848Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K, De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A.(2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology onreal-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365-374.https:!ldoi.org/https:!ldoi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, L, & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking inteacher education. In Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy onComputational Thinking (pp. 205-220). Springer.Vi, T.; Shaohui, T.; & Xiaolang, Z. (2010, November 10). China is welcome toinvest in Malaysia: Malaysian minister. Retrieved March 1,2015, fromhttp://news.xinhuanet.comlenglishlchina/2014-11110/c_133778777.htmYin, R K (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (applied socialresearch methods). London and Singapore: Sage.Zaman, R, Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, 1, de Ferrerre, E, & Looy, 1. Van.(2016). A Qualitative Inquiry into the Contextualized Parental MediationPractices of Young Children's Digital Media Use at Home. Journal ojBroadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 1-22.https://doi.org/l0.1080108838151.2015.1127240

Similar Items