Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya

Kajian yang menjurus kepada penularan gejala buli siber semakin giat dijalankan. Tujuan kajian inidijalankan adalah untuk meninjau situasi gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi,motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah. Kajian berbentuk kajiantinjauan melibatkan 250 orang mu...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nur Azilah Ismail
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2021
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5812
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5812
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Nur Azilah Ismail Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
description	Kajian yang menjurus kepada penularan gejala buli siber semakin giat dijalankan. Tujuan kajian inidijalankan adalah untuk meninjau situasi gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi,motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah. Kajian berbentuk kajiantinjauan melibatkan 250 orang murid sekolah menengah dari sebuah bandar di Pulau Pinang.Instrumen kajian merupakan soal selidik yang dibina penyelidik dan diadaptasi dari Cyberbullyingand Online Aggression Survey Instrument, bagi menilai empat aspek utama iaitu situasi gejalabuli siber, implikasi emosi, motivasi dan sosial. Kesahan dan tahap kebolehpercayaanitem-item soal selidik kajian berada pada tahap yang baik iaitu semua bahagian berada di arastinggi ( >0.8 ) dengan nilai yang diperoleh adalah 0.825. Data kajian dianalisis secara deskriptifdan inferensi dengan menggunakan kekerapan, peratusan, min dan juga korelasi. Dapatan yangdiperoleh menunjukkan situasi gejala buli siber berada pada tahap rendah iaitu 2.07 dalam skala 1hingga 5 mata. Analisis korelasi pula menunjukkan wujud hubungan yang signifikan dan positif namunberada di aras rendah antara gejala buli siber dan implikasi motivasi iaitu dengan nilai r =0.144 , p = 0.023 iaitu lebih kecil dari 0.05 (p <0.05). Manakala, bagi implikasi emosidan sosial didapati bahawa tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara gejala bulisiber dan juga implikasi-implikasi tersebut dengan nilai r = 0.117 ,nilai p = 0.064 bagi implikasiemosi dan implikasi sosial pula adalah r = 0.110, p = 0.083. Berdasarkan kajian ini item tiadakeseronokan melakukan sesuatu perkara dalam konstruk implikasi motivasi serta item berasa marahdan berasa takut dan berada dalam bahaya dari konstruk implikasi emosi mencatatkan nilai min tertinggi yang dialami mangsa buli siber. Kesimpulannya, penularan gejalabuli siber berupaya menyumbang kepada implikasi negatif terhadap murid sekolah menengah dari aspek emosi, motivasi dan sosial. Tindakan tegas pihak berwajib dankolaborasi semua pihak dalam mengenal pasti kaedah efektif bagi menangani impak yang dialami mangsadilakukan supaya kesejahteraan dan keseimbangan perkembangan diri generasi muda dari aspek jasmani,emosi, rohani dan intelektual dapat membantu ke arah menyumbang kepada keharmonian danpembangunan negara.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Nur Azilah Ismail
author_facet	Nur Azilah Ismail
author_sort	Nur Azilah Ismail
title	Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
title_short	Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
title_full	Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
title_fullStr	Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
title_full_unstemmed	Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya
title_sort	gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di bandar seberang jaya
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2021
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5812
_version_	1747833230062518272
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:58122021-04-09 Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya 2021 Nur Azilah Ismail LB Theory and practice of education Kajian yang menjurus kepada penularan gejala buli siber semakin giat dijalankan. Tujuan kajian inidijalankan adalah untuk meninjau situasi gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi,motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah. Kajian berbentuk kajiantinjauan melibatkan 250 orang murid sekolah menengah dari sebuah bandar di Pulau Pinang.Instrumen kajian merupakan soal selidik yang dibina penyelidik dan diadaptasi dari Cyberbullyingand Online Aggression Survey Instrument, bagi menilai empat aspek utama iaitu situasi gejalabuli siber, implikasi emosi, motivasi dan sosial. Kesahan dan tahap kebolehpercayaanitem-item soal selidik kajian berada pada tahap yang baik iaitu semua bahagian berada di arastinggi ( >0.8 ) dengan nilai yang diperoleh adalah 0.825. Data kajian dianalisis secara deskriptifdan inferensi dengan menggunakan kekerapan, peratusan, min dan juga korelasi. Dapatan yangdiperoleh menunjukkan situasi gejala buli siber berada pada tahap rendah iaitu 2.07 dalam skala 1hingga 5 mata. Analisis korelasi pula menunjukkan wujud hubungan yang signifikan dan positif namunberada di aras rendah antara gejala buli siber dan implikasi motivasi iaitu dengan nilai r =0.144 , p = 0.023 iaitu lebih kecil dari 0.05 (p <0.05). Manakala, bagi implikasi emosidan sosial didapati bahawa tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara gejala bulisiber dan juga implikasi-implikasi tersebut dengan nilai r = 0.117 ,nilai p = 0.064 bagi implikasiemosi dan implikasi sosial pula adalah r = 0.110, p = 0.083. Berdasarkan kajian ini item tiadakeseronokan melakukan sesuatu perkara dalam konstruk implikasi motivasi serta item berasa marahdan berasa takut dan berada dalam bahaya dari konstruk implikasi emosi mencatatkan nilai min tertinggi yang dialami mangsa buli siber. Kesimpulannya, penularan gejalabuli siber berupaya menyumbang kepada implikasi negatif terhadap murid sekolah menengah dari aspek emosi, motivasi dan sosial. Tindakan tegas pihak berwajib dankolaborasi semua pihak dalam mengenal pasti kaedah efektif bagi menangani impak yang dialami mangsadilakukan supaya kesejahteraan dan keseimbangan perkembangan diri generasi muda dari aspek jasmani,emosi, rohani dan intelektual dapat membantu ke arah menyumbang kepada keharmonian danpembangunan negara. 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5812 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5812 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Adler, A. & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement,andrecommendations. International journal of wellbeing, 6(1).Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.Alzahrin Alias & Mohd Nasaruddin Parzi. (2015). Remaja terpengaruh media sosial. BHPlus, 1- 10.Aliff Nawi., Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria., Norkhairiah Hashim. & Chua Chy Ren (2015). Penilaiankualiti modul iPBL: Aspek kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis JQMA, 11(2), 1-10.Azizi Yahaya, Voo, P, Ismail Maakip. & Mohd Dahlan A. Malek, (2017). Kaedah Penyelidikan DalamPendidikan. Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Azianura Hani Shaari, Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin (2019). Buli siber: Ketidaksantunan bahasadan etika media sosial dalam kalangan remaja Malaysia. e-Bangi, 16(6).Azman Ab. Rahman. (2019). Pengurusan institusi zakat berdasarkan Maqasid Syariah dan matlamatpembangunan lestari (SDG). Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 42-59.Bailey, G. (2013). Cyberbullying: Victimization through electronic means. Current Issuesin Education, 18(1), 1-7.Balkishan Sharma (2016). A focus on reliability in developmental research through Cronbachs Alphaamong medical, dental and paramedical professionals. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences,3(4), 271-278.Beran, T. & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment : A study of new method for an old behavior. Journal ofEducational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277.Bottino, S. B., Bottino, C. C., Regina, C. G., Correia, A. V. L. & Ribeiro, W. S.(2015). Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: systematic review. Cad. Saude Publica, 31(3),463-475.Boca-Zamfir, M. (2016). Psychological effects of cyberbullying in adolescence theoreticalanalysis. Romanian Journal Of Experimental Applied Psychology, 379-383.Brack, K. & Caltabiano, N. (2014). Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults.Brewer, G. & Kerslake, J. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computersin Human Behavior, 48, 255-260.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. AmericanPsychologist, 32(7), 513.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Researchperspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723.Buli siber menjejaskan kualiti tidur, kemurungan. (2019). Free Malaysia Today, 17.Camelford, K. G. & Ebrahim, C. (2016). The cyberbullying virus: A psychoeducational interventionto define and discuss cyberbullying among high school females. Journal of Creativity inMental Health, 11(3-4), 458-468.Carvalho, M., Branquinho, C. & Matos, M. G. D. (2017). Cyberbullies, cybervictims andcyberbullies-victims: Discriminant factors in portuguese adolescents. Psicologia, Sade &Doenas, 18(3), 657-668.Caravita, S. C., Colombo, B., Stefanelli, S. & Zigliani, R. (2016). Emotional,psychophysiological and behavioral responses elicited by the exposition to cyberbullyingsituations: Two experimental studies. Psicologia educativa, 22(1), 49-59.Cenat, J. M., Herbert, M., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., Guerrier, M. & Derivois, D. (2014).Cyberbullying, psychological distress and self-esteem among youth in QuebecSchools. Journal Affective Disorder, 169, 7-9.Christi, C. B. & David, A. B. (2018). Child & adolescent development in your classroom topicalapproach. 3rd ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.Che Hasniza Che Noh & Mohd Yusri Ibrahim (2014). Kajian penerokaan buli siber dalam kalanganpelajar UMT. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 323-329.Che Hasniza Che Noh, Mohd Yusri Ibrahim & Fatimah Yusooff (2018). Meneroka ciri dan faktorbuli siber dalam kalangan remaja di Malaysia. Terengganu, Malaysia: Penerbit UMT.Chemsi, G., Sadiq, M., Radid, M. & Talbi, M. (2020). Study of the self-determined motivationamong students in the context of online pedagogical activities. International Journal ofEmerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(05), 17-29.Cross, D., Lester, L. & Barnes, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of the social and emotionalpredictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimization. InternationalJournal of Public Health, 60(2), 207-217.Davies, R. B. (1977). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under thealternative. Biometrika, 64(2), 247-254.DePaolis, K. J. & Williford, A. (2019). Pathways from cyberbullying victimization to negativehealth outcomes among elementary school students: A longitudinal investigation. Journal ofChild and Family Studies, 28(9), 2390-2403.Den Hamer, A. H. & Konijn, E. A. (2015). Adolescents' media exposure may increase theircyberbullying behavior: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 203-208.Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social indicatorsresearch, 31(2), 103-157.Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decadesof progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.Dredge, R., Gleeson, J. F. & De la Piedad Garcia, X. (2014). Risk factors associated with impactseverity of cyberbullying victimization: A qualitative study of adolescent online socialnetworking. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 17(5), 287-291.Eden, S., Heiman, T. & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2016). Bully versus victim on the internet: Thecorrelation with emotional-social characteristics. Educaton Information Technology, 21,699-713.Elipe, P., Mora-Merchn, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R. & Casas, J. A. (2015). Perceived emotionalintelligence as a moderator variable between cyber victimization and its emotionalimpact. Journal Frontiers in Psychology, 6(486),1-11.Englander, E., Donnerstein, E., Kowalski, R., Lin, C. A. & Parti, K. (2017). Definingcyberbullying. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S148-S151.Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society 2nd ed. New York: Norton.Erikson, E. H. (1968). Youth: Identity and crisis. New York: WW.Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.Espinoza, G. (2015). Daily cybervictimization among Latino adolescents: Links with emotional,physical and school adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 38, 39-48.Foody, M., Samara, M. & Carlbring, P. (2015). A review of cyberbullying and suggestions foronline psychological therapy. Internet Interventions, 2(3), 235-242.Fryling, M., Cotler, J., Rivituso, J., Mathews, L. & Pratico, S. (2015). Cyberbullying or normalgame play? impact of age, gender and experience on cyberbullying in multi-player onlinegaming environments: Perceptions from one gaming forum. Journal of InformationSystemsApplied Research (JISAR), 8(1), 4-15.Gaol, N. T. L. (2016). Teori stres: Stimulus, respons, dan transaksional. Buletin psikologi, 24(1),111.Gonzlez-Calatayud, V. (2018). Victims of cyberbullying in the Region of Murcia: A growingreality. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(1), 10-16.Graham, R. & Wood Jr, F. R. (2019). Associations between cyberbullying victimization anddeviant health risk behaviors. The Social Science Journal, 56(2), 183-188.Halpern, D., Pia, M. & Vsquez, J. (2017). Loneliness, personal and social well-being: Towards aconceptualization of the effects of cyberbullying/Soledad, bienestar social e individual:Hacia una conceptualizacin de los efectos del cyberbullying. Cultury Educacin, 29(4),703-727.Hanif Suhairi Abu Bakar. (2015). The emergence themes of cyberbullying amongadolescences. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(4), 393-406.Heiman, T., Olenik-Shemesh, D. & Eden, S. (2015). Cyberbullying involvement among studentswith ADHD: Relation to loneliness, self-efficacy and social support. European Journal ofSpecial Needs Education, 30(1),15-29.Helma Hassan. (2018). Buli siber di Malaysia. Buletin Kesihatan, 1-7.Herzberg, F. (1976). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review,40(1), 53-62.Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding tocyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middleand high school students. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(5), 711-722.Jacobs, N. C., Goossens, L., Dehue, F., Vllink, T. & Lechner, L. (2015). Dutch cyberbullyingvictims experiences, perceptions, attitudes and motivations related to (coping with)cyberbullying: Focus group interviews. Societies, 5(1), 43-64.Johanson, G. A. & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilotstudies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400.Jose, B. A., Craig, W. L. & Lela, R. W. (2018). Human behavior in the social environment: Amultidimensional perspective 6th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.Junaidi, R., Ali, T. I. M. T. M. & Mamat, M. (2018). Mesosistem dalam novel kanak-kanakterpilih. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 29(1), 181-200.Kalaisilven, S. & Mohamad Fauzi Sukimi (2019). Kawalan ibu bapa terhadap anak-anak dalampenggunaan media sosial (Parental control over children in the use of Ssocialmedia). Akademika, 89(1).Kim, G. D. (2011). The adolescent development, relationships and culture. 13th ed. Boston:Pearson Education.Kim, S., Colwell, S. R., Kata, A., Boyle, M. H. & Georgiades, K. (2018). Cyberbullyingvictimization and adolescent mental health: Evidence of differential effects by sex andmental health problem type. Journal Youth Adolescence, 47, 661-672.Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P. & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying : Bullying in the digitalage. 2nd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Kowalski, R. M. & Toth, A. (2018). Cyberbullying among youth with and withoutdisabilities. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 11(1), 7-15.Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for researchactivities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.Lai, C. S., Mohamad, M. M., Lee, M. F., Mohd Salleh, K., Sulaiman, N. L., Rosli, D. I. & Chang,W. S. (2017). Prevalence of cyberbullying among students in Malaysian higher learninginstitutions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 781-784.Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: SpringerPublishing Company.Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changingoutlooks. Annual review of psychology, 44(1), 1-22.Maslow, A. H (1996). Critique of self-actualization theory, in: E. Hoffman Ed. Future visions:The unpublished papers of Abraham Maslow. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2632Matos, A. P., Vieira, C. C., Amado, J., Pessoa, T. & Martins, M. J. D. (2018). Cyberbullying inPortuguese schools: Prevalence and characteristics. Journal of school violence, 17(1), 123-137.Maliah Surip. (2018). Pembuli, pemangsa dunia siber. Jurnal-Kosmo Online, 1-8.Mahali, S. N. H., Cosmas, G. & Seok, C. B. (2019). Apakah yang kita faham mengenaikesejahteraan kanak-kanak? Kajian kes di Pulau Gaya, Sabah. Sains Humanika, 11(1).Marret, M. J. & Choo, W. Y. (2017). Factors associated with online victimization among Malaysianadolescents who use social networking sites: A cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 7(6).Ngo Yew Yung, Nasharuddin Imraan Rosli , Muhammad Afiq Aizaq Mat Salleh @ Sukri,Nasharuddin Imraan Rosli, Fatin Nur Syahirah Abdul Hamid., Nor Nasihah Mohd Robi,Nurul Nasuha Rosly. & Mohd Razimi Husin (2019). Gejala buli secara fizikal yang semakinberleluasa di sekolah. International Journal of Humanities, Management and SocialScience, 2(1), 65-75.Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescenthealth. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143-158.Noraini, Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. 2nd ed. Selangor, Malaysia: McGraw- HillEducation.Olenik-Shemesh, D. & Heiman, T. (2017). Cyberbullying victimization in adolescents as related tobody esteem, social support, and social self-efficacy. The Journal of geneticpsychology, 178(1), 28-43.On The Alert For Cyberbullying-Letters. (2017). The Star Online, 1-4.Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchan, J. A., Genta, M. L., Brighi, A., Guarini, A. & Smith, P. K.(2012).The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims : A European crossnationalstudy. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 342-356.Osemeke, M. & Adegboyega, S. (2017). Critical review and comparism between Maslow, Herzbergand McClelland's theory of needs. Funai Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance, 1(1),161-173.Othman Talib. (2015). SPSS: Analisis data kuantitatif untuk penyelidik muda. MPWS RichPublication Sdn. Bhd.Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look atcyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148-169.Patrick, L., Andy, B., Ross, D. P. & Mary, G. (2012). Developmental psychology. New York,NY: Mc Graw-Hill Education.Peled, Y. (2019). Cyberbullying and its influence on academic, social, and emotionaldevelopment of undergraduate students. Heliyon, 5(3).Peyton-Brown, C. (2010). Bullying and gender: The social/emotional, psychological, and physicaleffects on middle school students in south Mississippi. Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest LLC.Price, M. & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies asdescribed by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29(2), 51.Radzali, N. F. J., Kenayathulla, H. B. & Ghani, M. F. A. (2018). Analisis implementasi undangundang siber di beberapa buah sekolah menengah Kerian. JuPiDi: Jurnal KepimpinanPendidikan, 5(1), 64-77.Roberta, M. B. (2010). Child, family, school, community socialization and support. 8th ed.Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Robert, S. F. (2014). Life span development a topical approach. 2nd ed. New Jersey: PearsonEducation.Rose, N. N. & Mustafa, M. Y. (2018). Stress among working women: Counseling servicesusing the Lazarus stress theory and the practice of solution-focused therapy. AsianSocialWork Journal, 3(1), 28-34.Rozanizam Zakaria (2018). Viral bentuk baharu buli siber. Kolumnis Berita Harian, 1-8.Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale, version 3: Reliability, validity and factorstructure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40.Safaria, T. (2016). Prevalence and impact of cyberbullying in a sample of Indonesian junior highschool students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 82-91.Safiek Mokhlis. (2019). Buli siber dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah: Satu penerokaanawal. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 1(2), 7-18.Saibon Jamalsafri, Leong, A.C.H. & Muhamad Zahir Abd Razak. (2017). Enhancing knowledge ofbullying behavior through creative pedagogy among students. Malaysian Journal ofLearning and Instruction: Special Issues, 197-219.Samara, M., Burbidge, V., El Asam, A., Foody, M., Smith, P. & Morsi, H. (2017). Bullying andcyberbullying: Their legal status and use in psychological assessment. Internationaljournal of environmental research and public health, 14(12), 1449.Santrock, J. W. (2014). Adolescence. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 141-142.Santrock, J. W. (2014). A topical approach to life-span development. 7th ed. New York:Mc Graw-Hill Education.Simon, S. (2017). Cybervictimization: School experience of Malaysian cyberbulliedteenagers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 713-720.Siti Salmiah Abdul Hamid. (2015). Konflik kanak-kanak ketagih media sosial. Harian Metro, 1- 6.Siti Zarinah Sahib. (2019). Cegah Buli Siber. Harian Metro, 1-6.Suhaila Sharil., Mohamed Fairooz Mohamed Fathillah., Muhammad Yosef Niteh., Maad Ahmad.& Mukhamad Khafiz Abdul Basir. (2018). Faktor-faktor pengekang dalam perubahansosial. e-Prosiding Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 287-306.Suriana Che Awang. & Khadijah Alavi. (2019). Buli siber: Impak emosi dalam kalangan pelajarUKM. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 1(4), 83-94.Suryanarayana, N. S., Himabindu, G. & Neelima, V. (2011). Cyber psychology. New Delhi, India:Sonali Publications.Syafique Shuib. (2014). Kes buli siber meningkat, komuniti media sosial belum matang?.Tiong, X. T., Abdullah, N. S. S., Bujang, M. A., Ratnasingam, S., Joon, C. K., Wee, H. L. & YipFong, A. Y. (2018). Validation of the Kesslers psychological distress scale (K10 & K6) inMalaysian population. Asean Journal of Psychiatry, 19(1).Umesh, B., Farzana, R., Bindal, P. & Aminath, N. N. (2018). Student and teachers perspective oncyber-bullying. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3(1).Unik Hanifah Salsabila. (2018). Teori ekologi Bronfenbrenner sebagai sebuah pendekatan dalampengembangan kurikulum pendidikan agama Islam. Journal Al-Manar, 7(1).Vaillancourt, T., Faris, R. & Mishna, F. (2017). Cyberbullying in children and youth:Implications for health and clinical practice. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(6),368-373.Vieno, A., Gini, G., Lenzi, M., Pozzoli, T., Canale, N. & Santinello, M. (2014).Cybervictimization and somatic and psychological symptoms among Italian middleschool students. European Journal of Public Health, 25(3), 433-437Wang, W., Xie, X., Wang, X., Lei, L., Hu, Q. & Jiang, S. (2019). Cyberbullying and depressionamong Chinese college students: A moderated mediation model of social anxiety andneuroticism. Journal of affective disorders, 256, 54-61.Wolke, D. & Lereya, S. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of disease inchildhood, 100(9), 879-885.Woolfolk, A. & Margetts, K. (2013). Educational psychology. 3rd ed. Pearson Education.Zalaquett, C. P. & Chatters, S. J. (2014). Cyberbullying in college: Frequency, characteristics,andpractical implications. Sage Open, 4(1).Zuhayati Yazid (2017). SKMM terima 38 kes aduan buli siber dalam tempoh 11 bulan tahunini. Nasional- Utusan Online, 1-7.

Gejala buli siber dan implikasi terhadap emosi, motivasi dan sosial dalam kalangan murid di Bandar Seberang Jaya

Similar Items