Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru

Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan Program Latihan Acai Adidas (PLAA)berasaskan Model Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) berbanding Model LatihanTeknikal (MLT) terhadap prestasi permainan mini 4 lawan 4, kecergasan motor (KM) danpenulisan nota refleksi (PNR) pemain-pemain bola sepak...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faisal Karim
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2019
Subjects:
GV Recreation Leisure
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6301
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6301
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic GV Recreation Leisure
spellingShingle GV Recreation Leisure
Faisal Karim
Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan Program Latihan Acai Adidas (PLAA)berasaskan Model Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) berbanding Model LatihanTeknikal (MLT) terhadap prestasi permainan mini 4 lawan 4, kecergasan motor (KM) danpenulisan nota refleksi (PNR) pemain-pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG).Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimental dengan dua kumpulan iaitu 32orang dalam kumpulan rawatan (PLAA) dan 32 orang kumpulan kawalan (MLT). Jumlahkeseluruhan iaitu seramai 64 pemain berumur antara 18-23 tahun yang diagihkan secararawak. Prestasi permainan dinilai berdasarkan keupayaan pemain membuat keputusan (MK)dan pelaksanaan kemahiran (PK) dalam aspek hantaran, menggelecek, menanduk danmenjaring, sokong, lindung serta KM pemain (kepantasan, imbangan, koordinasi, kuasa,kelajuan dan masa tindakbalas). Selain itu, PNR pemain (keseronokan, penguasaan taktikaldan kemahiran serta peningkatan pemikiran) diuji ke atas pemain pada peringkat ujian pasca.Data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan menggunakan ujian-t dan ANCOVA, manakala datakualitatif dianalisis berdasarkan analisis konten. Dapatan ujian pasca bagi komponen MKmenunjukkan terdapat peningkatan yang signifikan untuk kumpulan PLAA (hantaran,t(62)=5.099, p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Faisal Karim
author_facet Faisal Karim
author_sort Faisal Karim
title Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
title_short Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
title_full Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
title_fullStr Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
title_full_unstemmed Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru
title_sort kesan program latihan acai adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak institut pendidikan guru
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
publishDate 2019
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6301
_version_ 1747833254074908672
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:63012021-10-18 Kesan program latihan Acai Adidas terhadap prestasi permainan dan kecergasan pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru 2019 Faisal Karim GV Recreation Leisure Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan Program Latihan Acai Adidas (PLAA)berasaskan Model Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) berbanding Model LatihanTeknikal (MLT) terhadap prestasi permainan mini 4 lawan 4, kecergasan motor (KM) danpenulisan nota refleksi (PNR) pemain-pemain bola sepak Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG).Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimental dengan dua kumpulan iaitu 32orang dalam kumpulan rawatan (PLAA) dan 32 orang kumpulan kawalan (MLT). Jumlahkeseluruhan iaitu seramai 64 pemain berumur antara 18-23 tahun yang diagihkan secararawak. Prestasi permainan dinilai berdasarkan keupayaan pemain membuat keputusan (MK)dan pelaksanaan kemahiran (PK) dalam aspek hantaran, menggelecek, menanduk danmenjaring, sokong, lindung serta KM pemain (kepantasan, imbangan, koordinasi, kuasa,kelajuan dan masa tindakbalas). Selain itu, PNR pemain (keseronokan, penguasaan taktikaldan kemahiran serta peningkatan pemikiran) diuji ke atas pemain pada peringkat ujian pasca.Data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan menggunakan ujian-t dan ANCOVA, manakala datakualitatif dianalisis berdasarkan analisis konten. Dapatan ujian pasca bagi komponen MKmenunjukkan terdapat peningkatan yang signifikan untuk kumpulan PLAA (hantaran,t(62)=5.099, p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6301 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6301 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan Abdullah, Zainuddin & Zainal Abidin (2011). Keberkesanan latihan kecrgasan fizikalberasaskan kemahiran motor terhadap atlet hoki UTM. Journal of PhysicalFitness. UTM, Skudai, Johor.Ahmad Hashim (2007). Indeks prestasi kecergasan fizikal kebangsaan pelajar. BahanArkib, Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Ahmad Wafi (1998). Sukan Padang. Jade Green Publication Sdn. Bhd.Almond, L. (1986). Games using making. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds),Rethinking game teaching Loughborough: University of Technology,Loughborough.Anderman, E. (2008). International Guide to Student Achievement. Routhledge, NewYork & London.Ary, Jacobs, L. C. Razavieh, A (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.).USA, Wadsworth Group.Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia (KPM), 2015.Bahagian Sukan, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2010). Modul latihan sukan untukguru penasihat kelab sukan sekolah. Putrajaya.Balakrisnan (2003). Keberkesanan Pendidikan Jasmani 80 minit sekali seminggu dalammeningkatkan tahap kecergasan fizikal berlandaskan kesihatan pelajarperempuan Tingkatan Empat (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). UniversitiMalaya: K.Lumpur.Balakrisnan, M (2012). Effectiveness of TGfU approach to improve students learningoutcomes of game performance in primary Physical Education programme.Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, UM Kuala Lumpur.Berita Harian Metro; ruangan Sukan, 16 Julai 2018.Berita Sukan SEA (2011). Sekretariat Sukan Sea, Kuala Lumpur.Bloomquist, M, Luhtanen, P., & Lasko, (2001). Comparisons of two types of instructionin Badminton. European Journal of Physical Education, 6, 139-156.Bestwick, B. (2001). Focused for Soccer. Human Kinetics. Chaimpaign, IL 6182-5076.Bompa, T.O. & Haff, G.G. (2009). Supercomposition in Training. Iowa: Prentice Hall, 6.Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training.Bompa T.O. (1999). Theory and Methodology of Training. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/HuntPublishing Company.Bompa T.O. (1977). Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training. HumanKinetics (6th. Edition).Buletin FAM (2017). Buletin Kejohanan Tempatan dan Antarabangsa.Buletin FAM (2018). Buletin Kejohanan Tempatan dan Antarabangsa.Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary school,Buletin Physical Education.Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986) dalam Nathan S. (2007). A model for the teaching ofgames in the secondary schools. The Bulletin of Physical Education, 5-8.Bunker, B, & Hooper, T (2001). Can we play that game again?. Strategies,14 (6), 23-27.Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design forresearch. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Chevalier, G., Mahut, B.., & Grehaigne, J.F. (2003). The Construction of student tacticalknowledge in bad TGFU in Physical Education & Sport: An InternationalPerspective. National Association for Sport & P.E. 135-151.Choy, L. C. (2006). Siri Sukan Popular Bola Baling. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.Clement, F., Micael, S.C., Martins, M.L & Mendes, R. (2012). The usefulness of smallsided games on soccer training. Study of human performance, Lisbon TechnicalUniversity, Portugal.Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research. (1999). FITNESSGRAM. Test administrationManual. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.Corbin, C.B. (2002). Concept of Physical Fitness with Laboratories. Ed. Ke-6. Dubuque,Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.Dodds, P., Griffin, L.L. & Placek, J.H. (2001). Selected review of the literature ondevelopment of learners domain specific knowledge. Journal of TeachingPhysical Education, 20, 301-313.Faigenbaum, A., & Pollock, M. (1999). Prescription of resistance training for health anddisease. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 31 (1), 38-45.Forrest, G., Webb, P., & Pearson, P (2006). TGfU: A model for pre-service teachers.Journal Health of Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance.Fraenkal, J.R. & N.E. Wallen (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research inEducation.3rd. ed. New York: Mc. Graw. Hill, Inc.French, K.E., Werner, P.H., Taylor, K., Hussey, K. & Jones, J. (1996). The effects of a 6week unit of tactical, skill or combined tactical and skill instruction on Badmintonperformance of nine grade students. Journal of Physical Education, 15, 439-463.Gall, J.P. & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th. Edition)Gaskill, S. E., & Sharkey, B. J. (2007). Fitness & Health. USA: Human Kinetics.Gill (2000). Dipetik daripada penulisan tesis Master oleh Roslan Khalid, UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak(UPSI), 2008.Gay, L.R. (1996). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application.New Jersey: Merrill.Gay, L.R. & Arrasin, S.P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis andApplication. New Jersey: Merrill.Gray, S. & Hall, E. (2015) Coaching tactics. In practical coaching, New York. Routledge.Gray, S., & Sproule, J., (2011). Developing pupils performance in team invasion games.PE and Sport Pedagogy, 16, 1, 15-18.Grehaigne, J.F., Richard, J.F. & Griffin L.L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sportsand games. Routledge Falmer, New York.Griffin, L.L., & Patton, K (2005). Two Decade of Teaching Games for Understanding:Looking at the past, present and future. Theory, Research and Practice.Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate dataanalysis (6th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Harrison, J. M., Precce, L.A., Blakemore, C.L., Richards, R.P., Wilkinson, C., &Fellingham, G.W (2004). Effect of two instructional models- skill teaching andmastery learning- on skill development, knowledge, self efficacy and game playin Volleyball. Journal of teaching in Physical Education, 19 (1), 34-57.Harvey, S., Cushion, C.J., Wegis, H.M. & Gonzales, A.N.M. (2010). Teaching Games forUnderstanding in American High School Soccer: A quantitative data analysisusing the game performance assessment instrument. PE and Sport Pedagogy, 15(1), 29-54.Ho (2003). Dipetik daripada penulisan tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan.Sanmuga Nathan, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Pulau Pinang (2007).Hoe, W., E. (2001). Attitude of Physical Education Teachers towards PhysicalEducational and Implementation of Physical Education Programe in SecondarySchool (Tesis Kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, KualaLumpur.Hooper & Davis (1988). Model of games education. Journal of Education. Dipetikdaripada Abu Zarin Abu Bakar (2004), Jabatan PJK, IPGM Kampus Dato Razali,Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu.Idris Mohamad (2005). Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia (2015). Laporan, Berita Sukan dan Permainan IPGM,KPM.Jaegar, R. M. (1990). Statistic A Spectator Sport: The International ProfessionalPublishers. (2nd.edi). Newbury Park, London & New Delhi.Joy, I. Butler and Barbara, J. McCahan (2005). TGFU: As A Curriculum Model, in L.Griffin and J. Butler (Eds.) TGFU; Theory, Research and Practice. Windsor;Human Kinetics.Johnson, B. A., & Nelson, J. K. (1986). Practical measurement for evaluation in physicaleducation (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Buregess Pub.Jorgensen & Nicolaisen (1986). Two method for determining trunk extensor endurance.European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 55 (6).Julismah Jani. (2007). Pengenalan ilmu konten pedagogi dalam Pendidikan Jasmani danSains Sukan. Tanjung Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Kementerian Belia dan Sukan & Persatuan Bola Sepak Malaysia (2015). ProgramUsahasama Pembangunan Sukan (Bola Sepak).Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2015), Berita Sukan dan Permainan, Bahagian Sukan,Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM).Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2017). Buletin Kejohanan Utama Kelolaan BahagianSukan dan Kebudayaan Kesenian, 2010-2016.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2016). Modul Latihan Sukaan untuk Guru PenasihatKelab Sukan Sekolah. Putrajaya.Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A., (2002). Teaching Game for Understanding and SituatedLearning: rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Journal of Teaching in PhysicalEducation, 21, 177 - 192.Knudson, D.V & Morrison, C.S (2002) dalam Nathan S. (2007). Qualitative Analysis ofHuman Movement 2nd. Edi. Human Kinetics. Champaign. Illinois.Koekoek, J., Kamp, J., Walinga, W. & Hilvoorde, I. (2014). Consulting ChildrenThoughts About Their Learning Experiences In PE. Agora for PE and Sport, 6(3),232-254.Lawton, J. (1989). Comparison of Two Teaching Methods in Games; Bulletin of PhysicalEducation, 25(1), 35-38.Lee, W. A. S. S., Rengasamy S., & Hooi, L. B. (2015). The effectiveness of TeachingGames for Understanding (TGfU) in improving the Hockey dribbling skillsamong school girls. International Journal of Health, Physical Education andComputer Science in Sport, 17(1), 129-133.Light, R. (2005). Inter grating theory and practice in teacher education: The impact of agame sense unit on female pre-service primary attitude towards teaching PhysicalEducation. Journal of Physical Education (New Zealand), 38(1), 67-80.Light, R. & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the Game: Intergrating Speech and ActionThrough TGFU. Quest, 55(2), 161-176.Liu, Y. K. (1992). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU): Implementation in HongKong context. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference: Teaching sportand Physical Education for understanding. Association De International desEcoles Superiors DEducation Physique.Macdonald, D. (2004). Understanding learning in physical education. In critical inquiryand problem solving in physical education.Mandigo, J, L., & Holt, N., L., (2004). Reading the game, Introducing the nation of gameliteracy. Physical and Health Educational Journal, 70(3), 4-10.Mandigo, J.., Butler, J.., & Hooper, T (2007). What is TGfU? A Canadian perspective.Physical & Health Education, 14-20.Mangi, R., Joki, P. & Dayton, O.W. (1987). Sport Fitness and Training. New York:Pantheon Books.Martin, S. T. & Wankel, L. M. (1985). Factors underlying enjoyment of youth sport:Sport age group comparisons. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(1), 51-64.Matveyev, A.N. (1965). Most strength training research to date on program design.Fundamental of Sports Training. Zelenograd, Russia.McMorris, T & Hale, T (2006). Coaching science: theory into practice, London: JohnWikey & sons.Mendez, A., Valero, A. & Casey, A. (2010). What are we being told how to teach games?A threes dimensional analysis of comparative research into different instructionalstudies Physical and School Sport. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del deporte.18(6), 356.Metzler, M. (2000). Instructional models for Physical Education. Virginia, Ally andBeicon.Mitchell, S.A., Griffin, L.L & Oslin, J.L. (1994). Tactical awareness asadevelopmentally appropriate focus for teaching of games in elementary andsecondary Physical Education. The Physical Educator, 51, 21-27.Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L.L & Oslin, J. L. (1995). The effect of two instructionalapproaches on game performance. In Pedagogy in Practice: Teaching andCoaching in Physical Education and Sport, 1(1), 36-48.Mitchell, S.A.., Griffin, L.L.., & Oslin, J.L (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills. Atactical games approach, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Mitchell, S. A.., Oslin, J.L. & Griffin, L.L (2003). Teaching sport concepts and skills. Atactical games approach (2nd ed.), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Mohamad Noh Farihan Sulong (2014). Kesan regim latihan TGfU dan SET terhadapprestasi Bola Sepak murid asli di negeri Pahang. Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidakditerbitkan. UPSI, Tanjung Malim.Mohamad Razali Abdullah & Abu Zarin Abu Bakar (2004). Seminar KebangsaanPendidikan Sukan & Rekreasi 2004; Memperkasakan Bangsa Melalui PendidikanSukan & Rekreasi; Kesesuaian Bateri Ujian Kecergasan Fizikal PemainAkademik Bola Sepak. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Mohd Izwan Shahril, Norkhalid Salimin & Julismah Jani (2017). Taakulan melaluiModifikasi Permainan. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka (DBP).Mohd Majid Konting (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd Seffie Abu Bakar (1995). Metodologi Penyelidikan(Edisi Kedua). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi: Ampang PressSdn. Bhd.Mohd Seffie Abu Bakar (1995). Metodologi Penyelidikan (Edisi Kedua). PenerbitUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi: Ampang Press Sdn. Bhd.Mohd Sidek., & Jamaluddin Ahmad (2005). Pembinaan Modul. Bagaimana modullatihan dan modul akademik. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.Morgan, R., Orine, P., Anderson, L. & Drust, B. (2014). Principles and practices forsoccer. Journal of Sport and Health Science 3, 251-257.Nathan, S (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Badminton Game Instructions Effect ofNon- Linear Pedagogy and Linear Pedagogy. International Journal of PhysicalEducation.Nathan, S (2017). Coaching Games Via Non-Linear Pedagogy Coaching forUnderstanding. International Journal of Physical Education.Nathan, S (2017). The Effect of Teaching Games of Understanding as a CoachingInstruction Had on Adjust, Cover and Heart Rate among Malaysian and IndianJunior Hockey Players. International Journal of Physical Education.Nathan, S. (2016). Badminton; Instructional in Malaysian Shcools: a comparasionanalysis of TGfU and SDT pedagogical model. Springer Plus, 5, 1215.Nathan, S. (2015). The effect of Teaching Gamess for Understanding as coaching, coverand heart rate among Malaysia and India junior hockey player. Sport 5 (2), 44.Nathan, S., Abd. Rahim Mohd Shariff & Norkhalid Salimin (2014). The effect ofteaching game for understanding coaching context on elite Malaysia schoolplayers in general hockey skills and mini game play. International Journal ofHumanities, Arts, Medicine and Science (MS), 2(4), 15-24.Nathan, S. (2014). Instruksi Model Taktikal Permainan. PTS Akademia, Selangor.Nathan, S., Khanna, G.L., Shishil, N., Bansal, A. & Kaushik, M.K. (2012). Effect ofTGfU training model between mini game performance, pulse rate andcardiovascular fitness among India junior player. The Global Journal of Healthand Physical Education 3(4), 1-12.Nathan, S (2008). The effects and sustainabilities of training programme using TGfUwith different teaching style on students with varity hockey skill levels. A paperpresented at 1st. Asia Pacific Sport in Physical Conference, Adelaide, Australia.Nathan, S (2007). Kesan Program Latihan Menggunakan Model Taktikal dengan StailPengajaran Berbeza Terhadap Murid Pelbagai Tahap Permainan Hoki (TesisKedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan). USM, Pulau Pinang.Noresah Baharom (2007). Kuala Lumpur; Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka; Edisi Keempat.Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual. A manual by step guide to data analysis usingSPSS for Windows (4th ed.). New South Wales: Everbest Printing Co.Piaw, C. Y. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Shah Alam: Mc Graw HillPublication.Piaw, C. Y. (2008). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan.Shah Alam: Mc Graw HillPublication.Piaw, C. Y. (2009). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan.Shah Alam: Mc Graw HillPublication.Quay (2002). Dipetik daripada penulisan tesis Master oleh Roslan Khalid, UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), Tanjung Malim, Perak (2008).Raven (1981). Dipetik daripada Abu Zarin Abu Bakar (2004), Jabatan PJK, IPGMKampus Dato Razali, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu.Rink, J.E. (1998). Teaching Physical Education for learning (2nd. Ed). Boston: WCB /Mcgraw Hill.Rink, J.E. (2002). Teaching Physical Education for Learning (4th.edi). New York:Mcgraw Hill.Rovegno, I., Nevett, M. & Barbiarz, M. (2001). Invasion Game Tactics in 4th. Grade:Introduction and Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Teaching PhysicalEducation, 20, 341351.Salim Mohamad Nasir (2010). Perbandingan Kesan Regim Teknikal dengan RegimTaktikal (TGfU) dalam Latihan Pasukan Bola Sepak Terhadap KemahiranIndividu dan Kemahiran Berpasukan.Sang, M.S., (2010). Literatur dan Kaedah Penyelidikan (ed. Kedua), Ipoh:PenerbitanMultimedia Sdn. Bhd.Selye, H. (1956). The General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS). Model describes the threestageresponse the human body to stress.Nature 1936; 138:32.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston:Pearson Educational, Inc.Thomas, J.R., & Nelson, J.K (2001). Research Method in Physical Activity (4th.edi).Champaign: Human Kinetics.Thompson (2000). Dipetik daripada penulisan tesis Doktor Falsafah oleh Nathan, S.Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), 2007.Tsangaridou, N., & Polemitou, I. (2015). Exploring pre-service teachers reflections onteaching physical education. European physical education review, 21 (1), 66-82.Tuckman, W (1994). Conducting Education Research. Edisi ke-4. Harcourt BraceJovanorich, Inc.Turner, A. & Martinek, T.J. (1995). TGfU: A model forimproving decision making during game play. QUEST, 47, 44-63.Turner, A.P., & Martinek T.J. (1995). Teaching for understanding: A model forimproving dicision making during game play. QUEST, 47, 44-63.Turner, A. & Martinek, T.J. (1999). An Investigation into TGfU: Effects on Skill.Knowledge and Sports, 70, 3-21.Vogler & Schwarts (1993). Dipetik daripada penulisan tesis Master oleh Roslan Khalid,Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), 2008.Wan Mohamad, Wan Khairuddin (2011). Kesan model teknikal dan Model TGfU dalampengukuran kemahiran asas permainan Bola Sepak bagi pelajar Tingkatan Satudi Sek. Men. Hulu Selangor. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. UPSI, TanjungMalim, Perak Darul Ridzuan.Wankel, L. M. & Berger, B. G (1990). The psychological and social benefits of sport andphysical activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 167-182.Webb, P., & Pearson, P., (2008). An intergrated approach to TGfU. A paper presented at1st Asia Pacific Sport in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia. Journal ofHealth, PE, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33.Werner, P. & Almond, L.., (1990). Model of games education. Journal of PhysicalRecreation and Dance, 61 (4), 23-27.Woods, P. (2006). Faculty of Education, University of Plymouth. Diperoleh dari http://.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/Qualitative%20method%202/qualrshm.htm.

Similar Items