Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah

Kajian ini adalah bertujuan menilai Program Intervensi Tambah Opsyen (PITO) dalamkalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah dengan menggunakan modelpenilaian CIPP. Pengesahan instrumen penilaian menggunakan model pengukuranRasch. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah d...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2017
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6365
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6365
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
description	Kajian ini adalah bertujuan menilai Program Intervensi Tambah Opsyen (PITO) dalamkalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah dengan menggunakan modelpenilaian CIPP. Pengesahan instrumen penilaian menggunakan model pengukuranRasch. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah digunakan dalampenilaian ini. Pemilihan subjek penilaian dijalankan secara census sampling iaitumelibatkan 247 orang guru bukan opsyen yang pernah mengikuti PITO Sejarah daritahun 2011-2013 seluruh negara. Instrumen penilaian yang digunakan ialah borang soalselidik. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi. Analisisdeskriptif menjelaskan sumber, aktiviti dan tahap kepuasan pengajaran guru, manakalastatistik inferensi pula melibatkan ujian-t dan ANOVA yang menerangkan perbezaandalam pembolehubah penilaian. Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahawa sumber yangdigunakan dalam PITO dan aktiviti yang dijalankan dalam PITO menyumbang ke arahpeningkatan pengetahuan dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah dan kemahiran guru dalam PdPSejarah. Dapatan penilaian juga menunjukkan tahap kepuasan guru bukan opsyenmeningkat setelah mengikuti PITO Sejarah ini. Analisis ujian-t yang dijalankan jugamenunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara kemahiran pengajaran danpembelajaran guru berdasarkan jantina dan tempoh perkhidmatan guru. Manakala ujianANOVA juga menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dalam min tahap kepuasanpengajaran guru berdasarkan jantina dan pengalaman mengajar dalam mata pelajaranSejarah. Implikasi penilaian ini menunjukkan guru-guru bukan opsyen Sejarah yangtelah mengikuti PITO Sejarah ini telah menguasai pelbagai pengetahuan dan kemahiranberkaitan dengan perancangan, pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Sejarah,selain itu juga meningkatkan tahap kepuasan guru dalam melaksanakan pdp Sejarah dibilik darjah dari segi peningkatan minat guru terhadap Sejarah, peningkatan kepakarandalam pdp, peningkatan kemahiran dan perubahan tingkah laku murid kearah yanglebih positif terhadap mata pelajaran Sejarah. Kesimpulan menunjukkan PITO Sejarahtelah dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemahiran dan kepuasan guru dalampengajaran dan pembelajaran Sejarah.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali
author_facet	Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali
author_sort	Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali
title	Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
title_short	Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
title_full	Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
title_fullStr	Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
title_full_unstemmed	Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
title_sort	penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (pito) dalam kalangan guru sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2017
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6365
_version_	1747833259734073344
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:63652021-10-26 Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah 2017 Mohd Norlizam Mohd Razali LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini adalah bertujuan menilai Program Intervensi Tambah Opsyen (PITO) dalamkalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah dengan menggunakan modelpenilaian CIPP. Pengesahan instrumen penilaian menggunakan model pengukuranRasch. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah digunakan dalampenilaian ini. Pemilihan subjek penilaian dijalankan secara census sampling iaitumelibatkan 247 orang guru bukan opsyen yang pernah mengikuti PITO Sejarah daritahun 2011-2013 seluruh negara. Instrumen penilaian yang digunakan ialah borang soalselidik. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi. Analisisdeskriptif menjelaskan sumber, aktiviti dan tahap kepuasan pengajaran guru, manakalastatistik inferensi pula melibatkan ujian-t dan ANOVA yang menerangkan perbezaandalam pembolehubah penilaian. Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahawa sumber yangdigunakan dalam PITO dan aktiviti yang dijalankan dalam PITO menyumbang ke arahpeningkatan pengetahuan dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah dan kemahiran guru dalam PdPSejarah. Dapatan penilaian juga menunjukkan tahap kepuasan guru bukan opsyenmeningkat setelah mengikuti PITO Sejarah ini. Analisis ujian-t yang dijalankan jugamenunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara kemahiran pengajaran danpembelajaran guru berdasarkan jantina dan tempoh perkhidmatan guru. Manakala ujianANOVA juga menunjukkan tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dalam min tahap kepuasanpengajaran guru berdasarkan jantina dan pengalaman mengajar dalam mata pelajaranSejarah. Implikasi penilaian ini menunjukkan guru-guru bukan opsyen Sejarah yangtelah mengikuti PITO Sejarah ini telah menguasai pelbagai pengetahuan dan kemahiranberkaitan dengan perancangan, pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Sejarah,selain itu juga meningkatkan tahap kepuasan guru dalam melaksanakan pdp Sejarah dibilik darjah dari segi peningkatan minat guru terhadap Sejarah, peningkatan kepakarandalam pdp, peningkatan kemahiran dan perubahan tingkah laku murid kearah yanglebih positif terhadap mata pelajaran Sejarah. Kesimpulan menunjukkan PITO Sejarahtelah dapat meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemahiran dan kepuasan guru dalampengajaran dan pembelajaran Sejarah. 2017 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6365 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6365 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abdul Kudus Abu Bakar (2000). Kepimpinan transformasi: Hubungannya dengan kepuasan kerja danmotivasi guru. Unpublished master's thesis. Kedah : Universiti Utara Malaysia.Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid (1989). Strategi Pengajaran Sejarah KBSM. Kuala Lumpur : FajarBakti Sdn. Bhd.Abdul Rahim Hamdan (2007). Pengajian Kurikulum. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Abdullah Mohd Noor (2000). Kepelbagaian gaya pembelajaran pelajar dan pencapaian akademik. Seminar Prosiding Pendidikan Kebangsaan 2000.Abdul Shukor Abdullah (1998). Sejarah dalam sistem pendidikan Malaysia. Kertas kerja yangdibentangkan dalam Simposium Sejarah, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 3031 Oktober.Abdullah & Ainon. (2006). Guru Sebagai Pendorong Dalam Darjah. Pahang: PTS Publications andDistributor Sdn. Bhd.Adzmi Bin Yusoff (2003). Kerberkesanan Kaedah Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Dalam Mata PelajaranLukisan Kejuruteraan Bagi Sub Topik Unjuran Ortografik, Pandangan Isometrik Dan Oblik DiSekolah Menengah Teknik Pantai Timur. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Ahamad Rahim dan Sidek Said (2009). Pelaksanaan Kurikulum SejarahMenengah Rendah Di Malaysia Suatu Penilaian. Terengganu: Institut Pendidikan GuruKampus Sultan Mizan.Ahamad Rahim, Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Anuar Ahmad (2010). PenilaianKeberkesanan Perlaksanaan KurikulumMata Pelajaran Sejarah Menengah Rendah Tingkatan 2 di Sekolah-sekolah Menengah SemenanjungMalaysia. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Siswazah Jilid 3 2010 (77-88). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaAhmad Mahzan Ayob (1985). Kaedah penyelidikan sosioekonomi: Suatupengenalan, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.Ahmad Mohd. Salleh. (1997). Pendidikan Islam : Falsafah, pedagogi danmetodologi.Shah Alam : Penerbit Fajar Bakti.Ahmad Subki bin Miskon, Syed Ismail bin Syed Mustapa (2010). Budaya dan Pembelajaran Selangor:Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.Aiken, L.R. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment. Ed. Ke-10. Boston: Alllyn & Bacon.Aini Hassan (1992). Mata Pelajaran Sejarah KBSM. Apakah yang baru?. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru. 8,hlm.83-93.Alam, S.Sh., Talha, M., Sivanand, C.N., & Ahsan, N. (2005). Job satisfaction ofuniversity woman teachers in Bangladesh. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 88-91.Albert Bandura (1977). Social Learning Theory. Eagle Wood Cliff, New Jersey : Prentice Hall.Alenoush Saroyan & Linda S. Snell (1997). Variations in Lecturing Styles. Journal of HigherEducation Higher, Vol. 33, No. 1 (Jan., 1997), pp. 85-104Aliza Ali dan Zamri Mahamod. (2015). Pembangunan, penilaian dan kesahan kandungan modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan pendekatan bermain bagi kemahiran bahasa kanak-kanakprasekolah. Prosiding Seminar Pascasiswazah Pendidikan BahasaMelayu dan Kesusasteraan Bahasa Melayu 2015 . Bangi : Fakulti Pendidikan,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Al-Kaylani, Taisir dan Iyad, Mulhim. 1986. At-taujih al-Fanny fi Usulat-Tarbiyah wa Tadris. Beirut:Maktabah Lubnan.Alkin, M. C. (Ed.). (2004). Evaluation roots: tracing theorists views and influences.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Allen, T. (1992). Teaching Arabic in The United States; Past, Present and Future In The Arabiclanguage In America. Detroit: Wayne University Press.Alliger, G. M., & Janak, E. A. (1989). Kirkpatricks levels of training criteria: thirty yearslater. Personnel Psychology, 42, pp.331342. [11] Gallagher. M. (2000). Corporateuniversities. Higher education and the future: Emerging policy issues. Paper presented at theCorporate University Week 2000. Sydney, AustraliaAnuar Ahmad, Siti Haishah Abd Rahman & Nur Atiqah T. Abdullah. (2009). Tahap keupayaan pengajaranguru Sejarah dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian murid di sekolah berprestasi rendah. JurnalPendidikan 34 (1):53-66.Argyle, Michael. (1972). The Social Psychology of Work. Harmondsworth: PenguinBooks.Arundhati Mishra, Vijayshri dan Suresh Garg (2009). Evaluation of the UndergraduatePhysics Programme at Indira Gandhi National Open University: A Case Study?. The InternationalReview of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 106-123.Asmah Ahmad. (2003). Pembangunan sumber manusia serta latihan dan pembangunan staf: satu tinjauan persamaannya. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan,13 (02): 89-95.Atan Long (1980),Pedagogi : Kaedah Am Mengajar, Kuala Lumpur : Fajar Bakti Sdn.Bhd.Aziz Nordin & Siti Sumaziana Ali Mohamed (2011). Persepsi Bakal Guru Tentang Tahap KemahiranKomunikasi Berkesan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Aliran Sains Fakulti Pendidikan UTM.Jurnal Pendidikan.Bafzer, W.K., Kihm , J.A., Smith, P.C., Irwin, J.L., Bachiochi, P.D., Robie, C., Sinar, E.F., andParra, L.F. (1997). User's Manual for the Job Descriptive Index (JDI; 1997 revision) and the Job lnGeneral Scales, Bowling Green, Ohio, Bowling Green State Univercity, Department of Psychology.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (2001), Sukatan Pelajaran Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan Enam Minggu, (TukarOpsyen). Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (2005), Sukatan Pelajaran Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan Enam Minggu, (TukarOpsyen). Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (2010), Kurikulum Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan 14 Minggu, (Tambah Opsyen). Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bahasa dan Pustaka.Bar On (2010). The Bar On Model Intelegence of emotional social intelligent. In P. FernandezBerrocal an Extremera. Special Issue on emotional intellegent.Barnett, Hardelsmen dan Stenyart (1952) The Occupational level sale as measurement of drive.Vol.66.Barnett. R C . Brennan. R.T . Raudenbush, S W., & Marshall, N.L. (1994). "Gender and the Relationship between Marital-Rote Quality and Psychological Distress," Psychologlt ofWonten Quarterly. Vol 18, pp105-127Beach, D.S. (1980). Personnel: The management of people at work (4th ed.). NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.Beardwell, Ian., Holden, Len., dan Claydon, Tim. (2004). Human ResourceManagement : Contemporary Approach. Edisi Keempat. Leicester: Financial Times Prentice HallBecherer, R.C., Morgan, F.W. & Richard, L.M. (1982). The job characteristics of industrialsalespersons: Relationship to motivation and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 46(4):125135Bellenger, D.N., Wilcox, J.B. & Ingram, T.N. (1984). An examination of reward preferences for sales managers. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 4(2):16.Bellou, V. (2010). The role of learning and customer orientation for health care quality: Someevidence from Greece, Journal of Health, Organization and Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.383-395Bhasah Abu Bakar (2009). Asas Pengukuran Bilik Darjah. Edisi kedua. Tanjung Malim: Quantum Books.Blau, G. (1985). The Measurement and Prediction of Career Commitment. Journal of OccupationalPsychology. 58 (277).Borg, W.R. Gall, M. D. (1983), Educational Research An Introduction. New York : Longman.Boverie, P., Mulcahy, D. S., & Zondlo, J. A. (1994). Evaluating the effectiveness of trainingprograms. In J. W. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Developing Human Resources. Erlanger, KY: Pfeiffer &Company.Brooke, P. P., D. W. Russell & J. L. Price (1988). Discriminant validation of measures of jobsatisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73,139-145Brooke, P.P. (1988). Discriminant Validation Of Measures Of Job Satisfaction, Job Involvement andOrganizational Comitments. Journal of Apply Phsycologhy.Brown, H.D. (1980), Principal Of Foreign Language Learning and Teaching.Eaglewood Cliffs, N.: Practice Hall.Buell, M., Hallam, R., Gamel-Mccormick, M. & Scheer, S. 1999. A survey of general and specialinservice needs concerning inclusion. International Journal of Disability, Development andEducation 46: 143-156.Burke, B. M. (2007). Creating communicative classrooms with experiential design.Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 441-462.Burke, L.A. and Steensma, H.K. (1998). "Toward a model for relating executive careerexperiences and firm performance," Journal of Management Issues, X(1), Spring, pp 86- 102.Caine, G., Caine, R. (1994). MindShifts: A brain-based process for restructuring schools andrenewing education. Arizona, Zepher Press.Caine, G., Caine, R. N., & Crowell, S. (1994). MindShifts: A brain-based process for restructuringschools and renewing education. Arizona, Zepher Press.Cains, R.A. & Brown, C.R. 1996. Newly qualified teachers: A comparative analysis of the perceptionsheld by B.Ed. and PGCE-trained primary teachers of their training routes. Educational Psychology16: 257-270.Cascio, W. F. (1995). Pengurusan Sumber Manusia: Produktiviti, Kehidupan Kerja Berkualiti,Keuntungan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Chang, M.L. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work ofteachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193-218.Charles, C. M. (2008). Building Classroom Discipline (9th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education.Chelladurai, P. (1999). Human resource management in sport and recreation.Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S. & Ball, D. 2003. Resources, instruction, and research.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(2): 119-142.Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2009). Teachers work and pedagogy in an area of accountability.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 333 345.Coster, E.A. (1992). The perceived quality of working life and job facet satisfaction.Journal of Industrial Psychology, 18(2):69.Cox. T (1978). Stress. London : The Macmillan Press.Cron and John W. Slocum (1986), The Influence Of Career Stages on Salepeoples Job Attitude, WorkPerceptions and Performance Journal of Marketing Research 23(may), 119- 29Cruickshank. D.R and Metcalf, K.K (1995). Explaning, In Anderson, L.W (ed.) InternationalEncylopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (2?? edition).Oxford : Pergamom.Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in Americanclassrooms, 21880-1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College PressDarling Hommond, L. (2000).Teacher quality and student achievement : A review of state Policy andevidence, Seattle, WA: Center for the study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.De Nobile, J.J., & McCormick, J. (2005). Job satisfaction and occupational stress in catholicprimary schools. A paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association forResearch in Education, Sydney, November 27th December 1st, 2005.Doran, Stone, Brief and George (1991) Behavioral Intentions as Predictors of Job Attitudes: TheRole of Economic Choice. Journal ofApplied Psychology. Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 40-45.Du Plessis, S. (2003). Purpose is alive and well and living inside you: Key feature.Career Success, 3(1):12.Dunne, R, and Wragg, T. (1994). Effective Teaching, London :RoutledgeEe Ah Meng (1999). Pendidikan di Malaysia : Falsafah pendidikan, guru dan sekolah, Kuala Lumpur :Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.Eko Putro Widoyoko,S. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka PelajarEsah Sulaiman. (2004). Pengenalan Pedagogi. Skudai : Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaEthell, R.G. &Mc Meniman, M.M. (2000).Unlocking The Knowledge In Action Of An Expert Practitioner.Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 87-101. evaluating professionalism: from programmedesign to curriculum change. Med Educ. 2005; 39(2):127-36.Farida Yusuf. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: PT. Rineka CiptaFelix, J. L. (1979). Research and evaluation to improve instruction: The Cincinnati strategy.Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 1(2), 5762Fiedler, F. (1967). A Theory Of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: Mc Graw Hill. Fraser E.(1977). Home Enviroment And The School. University Of London: PressLondon.Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: RandMcNally. Also, Winne, P. H., Berliner, D. C., & Gage, N. L. (1975). Teachers manualfor educational psychology. And, Bierly, M. M., Berliner, D. C., & Gage, N.L. (1975). Student Study Guide for Educational Psychology.Galpin, T. (1996) Connecting culture to organizational change. HR Magazine, Volume 41, Issue 3,pp84-90.George M. Jacobs dan Loh Wan Inn. (2002). Read Aloud Asia Build Your Childs Knowledge andConfidence. Selangor : Times Subang Sdn BhdGoodenough. (1971) W. Culture, Language, and Society. Addison-Wesley. Gouws, J. (1995). ErrorBudgeting for Control System Design; S.A. Institute ofMechanical Engineers R&D Journal; 11(3), November 1995; pp.61-67Greenberger, E. & O'Neil, R. (1993). "Spouse, Parent, Worker: Role Commitments and Role-RelatedExperiences in the Construction of Adults' Well Being," Developmenlal , I':5tchologrcal, Y o1.29,pp l8l - 197.Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. & Laine, R. 1996. The effect of school resources on student achievement.Review of Educational Research 66: 361-396.Gruneberg, M.M. (1979). Understanding job satisfaction. Thetford, Norfolk, Great Britain: Lowe andBrydone Printers, LtdGutek, B.A. (1995). The Dynamics of Service: Reflection on the changing nature of customerinstrections. San Francisco : Jossy- Bass Publishers.Hackman and Oldham (1980). Work Redesign. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159- 170.Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R. (1975). Group Task, Group Interaction Process and Group PerformanceEffectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integartion. New York : Academic Press.Halimatun Saadiah Mahmud, (2003). Persepsi Guru terhadap Keberkesanan Kandungan Latihan DalamPerkhidmatan. Sarawak : UNIMAS.Hambrick, D. and Mason, P. (1984). "Upper echelons: The organizatron as reflection of its topmanagers," Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 195-206'Hamid Hasan (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum, cetakan kedua. Bandung: RemajaRosdakrya.Hashim, S., Yaakub, R. & Ahmad, M. Z. 2007.Pedagogi: StrategidanTeknik MengajarDengan Berkesan. Kuala Lumpur : PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.Herbert A. Simon (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes inAdministrative Organization. 4th ed. in 1997, The Free Press.Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Company.Herzberg, F. Masner, B. & Syndeman, B (1959). The Motivation To Work. New York: John Wiley andSons, Inc.Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley: New York.Hoole, C. & Vermeulen, L.P. (2003). Job satisfaction among South African pilots.South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1):5257http://ips043.wix.com/upsi#!guidelines/co0zHulin, C. L. and Smith P. C. (1967). An Empirical Investigation of Two Implications of the Two- Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 51 (3) :396 402Hulin, C.L., Roznowski, M. and Hachiya, D. (1985), Alternative Opportunities and WithdrawalDecisions, Emphiricaal and Theoritical Discrepencies and An Intergration, PsyshologicalBulletin, 97, 233-250Ibrahim Mamat (1996). Reka Bentuk Dan Pengurusan Latihan : Konsep Dan Amalan.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan PustakaIngersoll, R.M. & Gruber, K. 1996. Out of field teaching and educational equality. statisticalanalysis report. American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences. National Ceneter forEducation Statistics. Washington DC.Ingersoll, R.M. 2000. Out of Field Teaching. ERIC Digest.Ishak Haron & Koh Boh Boon (1983). Asas-Asas Dalam Pedagogi. Ipoh : Utusan Publication &Distributor.Ishak Md Shah (2002). Pengenalan Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Ismail bin Mustafa. (2008). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Teori dan Amalan. Pure Honey Enterprise, Kedah.Jamil bin Ahmad. 2002. Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah:satu penilaian. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaJin & Cortazzi (1998), The culture the learner brings: a bridge or a barrier? InLanguage Learning in Intercultural Perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography CUP: U.KCambridge.Johnson, D. W., dan Johnson, R. (1999). Learning Together And Alone : Cooperative, Competitive andIndividualistic Learning. 5th ed. Massachusetts : Allyn & Bacon.Josephine Tai Yee Vui (2006), Penilaian keberkesanan program latihan pengukuhan kemahiran bahasaInggeris dalam pengajaran sains dan teknologi berdasarkan persepsi pelatih : satu kajian dikalangan staf akademik, Fakulti Pendidikan, Skudai: UTMJudge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. (2002). Discriminant and incremental validityof four personality traits: Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, andgeneralized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 83, 693710Kalsom Binti Salleh (2008). Implikasi latihan dalaman kepada guru-guru sekolah rendah. (Tesis Sarjana Muda Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru.Kamarol Baharen Mohd Rom (2009). Peranan Kepimpinan Guru Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Sejarah Dalam Iklim Bilik Darjah. Shah Alam : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Mara.Kamarudin Hj. Husin dam Siti Hajar Hj. Abd. Aziz (1999). Pengajian Melayu 5 dan 6. (Pemulihan danPengayaan, Pengurusan Sumber Budaya dan Masyarakat Malaysia). Subang Jaya: Kumpulan BudimanSdn. BhdKamarul Azmi Jasmi dan Ab. Halim Tamrin (2007). Pendidikan islam: Kaedah PdP. Cet. Ke-2.. Skudai :Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Kamarul Baharen (2001). Peranan Kepimpinan Guru Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan MempengaruhiKeberkesanan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Sejarah Dalam Iklim Bilik Darjah. Shah Alam : PenerbitUniversiti Teknologi Mara.Kamus Dewan (1996). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan PustakaKatz, D. 1964. Motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9: 131146Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2006) (edisi pelancaran). Pelan induk Pembangunan Pendidikan2006-2010. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan PenyelidikanDasar Pendidikan, KPM.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia2013 2025 Putrajaya: KPM.Khine, M.S. (2004). Teaching and Classroom Management. Singapore. Prentice Hall.Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). Evaluation of training.In R. L. Craig (Ed.), Training and developmenthandbook: A guide to human resource development. New York: McGraw Hill.Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006).Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3?? ed). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler PublishersKlassen, R.M., Usher, E.L., & Bong, M. (2010a). Teachers collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education,78, 464-486.Krejce and Morgan (1976), Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.Educational and Psychological Measuremenfs. Vol. 30, pp. 607- 610.Lawrence. G. (1974). Patterns of Effectiveness inservice Education.Tailahasse.Florida, Department o f Education, University o f Texas. 122Levstik, Linda S. & Barton, Keith C. (2008). Researching History Education: Theory, Method, andContext. New York: Routledge.Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value, New York: McGraw-HillLim, T. S. (1995). Kepuasan kerja di kalangan guru-guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina dinegeri Kelantan. Unpublished master's thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, KedahLocke, E. A. (1969). What is Job Satisfaction? OB and Human Performance, Vol. 4, pp 309-336.Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.), Handbookof the Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Maimunah Osman. (2000). Komunikasi Berkesan, Perhubungan Interpersonal. Kuala Lumpur: InstitutTadbiran Awam Negara (INTAN).Markandan, R. (1984). Some factors affecting the satisfaction and dissatisfaction of selectedsecondary school teachers in Federal Territory. Unpublished master'sthesis, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Martin, A., Linfoot, K. & Stephenson, J. 1999. How Teachers Respond to ConcernsAbout Misbehaviour in Their Classroom. Psychology in the Schools 36: 347- 358.Maslow A.H. (1954) Motivation and Personality. Harper and Row Publisher, New York.Maslow, A.H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold CompanyMatthews, J. M., & Hudson, A. M. (2001). Guidelines for evaluating parent training programs. FamilyRelations, 50 (1), 77 86.Mazanah Muhamad, (1998). Keberkesanan Latihan: Pengalaman Sebuah Agensi Pengembangan di Malaysia,Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan . Universiti Putra Malaysia .Mazidah Baharuddin, (1998). Penilaian Program Latihan: Satu Kajian Mengenai Tahap KesesuaianProgram Latihan yang Dilaksanakan Dengan Keperluan Kerjaya Individu: Kajian Kes di ManagementDevelopment Centre, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Projek Sarjana.Mc Neely, R.L. (1983), Organizational Patterns and Work Satisfaction in a Comprehensive HumanService Agency: An Empirical Test, Journal of Applied Psychology.McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart(Ed.), Attention & performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 1-36). London: Erlbaum.McNamara, C. (1999). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews. From:http://www.mapnp.org/library/evaluatn/intrvi ew.htmMd Sani Ibrahim & Zuraidah Majid. (2002). Perkembangan Profesion Guru: Satu tuntutan dan satukemestian. Kertas dibentang di UPSITEC 2002Md. Nasir Masran (2000). Guru Cemerlang: Personaliti dan Kemahiran, Seminar KebangsaanPenyelidikan dan Pembangunan Dalam Pendidikan 2000. 3 4 Oktober 2000, Bahagian Pendidikan Guru,KPM, ms. 173 178).Michael Armstrong (2001), Performance Management : Key Strategies And Practical Guidelines, edisikedua. London : British Library.Mohamad Sani Ibrahim &Zuraidah Majid. (2002). Perkembangan Profesion Guru: Satu tuntutan dan satukemestian. Kertas dibentang di UPSITEC 2002.Mohamad Sultan Faujdar. (2000). Kualiti pengajaran sejarah di sebuah sekolahmenengah Daerah Sabak Bernam. Tesis Sarjana. UMMohamed Najib Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia.Mohd Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd. Azhar Abd.Hamid (2004) Kreativiti : Konsep dan Teori Praktis.Johor.universiti TeknologyMalaysia.Mohd. Mazlan Mohd. Jamhuri (1999) Bentuk dan keperluan program perkembangan staf untuk guru diSekolah Bestari. Sarjana Pendidikan. Serdang : UPM.Mok Soon Sang. (2001). Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Diploma Perguruan. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan BudimanSdn.Bhd.Morrison, E.W. (1994). Roles Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior : The Importanceof The Employees Perspective. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 37 : 1543-1567.Muhammad H.Lee (2009). Statistics: Formulae and Tables. Johor : Penerbit Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Mumtaz Begam Abdul Kadir, (2008), Kesan Integriti Kepimpinan dan Pengurusan kualiti menyeluruhdimensi Kemanusiaan Terhadap Iklim Proses Organisasi di Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Mara.Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaMustaqim, H. (2001). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Murid.Noor Azlan Amad Zanzali (1987). The Malaysian Mathematics Progam: A Case Study of the DifferenceBetween Design Intention and Classroom Implementation, An unpublished doctoral dissertation at theUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.Nooraini Binti Othman, dan Khairul Anuar Bin Abdul Rahman. (2009). Hubungan antara kompetensipensyarah dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogi dalam pendidikan matematik. Kajang: Utusan PublicationsNoran Fauziah dan Ahmad Mahdzan Ayob(1990), Guru dan Perguruan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Norasmah Othman. 2002. Keberkesanan program keusahawanan remaja di sekolah menengah. Tesis DoktorFalsafah, Universiti Putra MalaysiaNoriati A.Rashid. Boon Poon Ying.Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2009). MuriddanAlam Belajar.Oxford Fajar. SelangorNorizan Ahmad (2003), Kemahiran dan Penggunaan Komputer dalam PengajaranSains di Sekolah Menengah : Lebih Banyak Soalan Dari Jawapan, Maktab Perguruan Teknik Kuala Lumpur.Nur Hayati Cristina (2005), Adaptasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu di Institusi Pengajian TinggiSwasta. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia : Tesis Sarjana Kedoktoran.Nurul Azhani (2008) Kajian persepsi komuniti terpilih terhadap pelancongan sukan: Monsoon Cup,Pulau Duyung (Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Ong, C. S. 1992. Effectiveness of the in-service training programme for secondary school principalsat Institute Aminuddin Baki. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching andlearning environments: First results from TALIS teachingand learning international survey.Australian Council for Educational Research.Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research method. California: Sage Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Sejarah Dalam Iklim Bilik Darjah. Fakulti Pendidikan. Shah Alam : UiTM.Philips, J. A. (1997). Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir : Teori dan Amalan . Kuala Lumpur : Utusan PubPhillips-Miller, D L., Campbell, N.J & Morrison, C.R. (2000). "Work and Family: Satisfaction,Stress, and Spousal Support," Journal of Entploymenl Coun'seling, March, Vol 37, ppl6-30Pinder, C.C. (1998). Work Motivation In Organizational Behavior. Toronto : Prentice HallInternational. Inc.Porter, G., & Brophy, M. (1988). Research on teacher effectiveness. Reston, VA: ASCD.Quaglia, R. & Marion, S. (1991). The relationship of teacher satisfaction to perceptions of school organization, teacher empowerment, work conditions, and community status.Education 112(2), 206-222.Ramatulasamma, K., & Bhaskara Rao, D. (2003). Job Satisfaction of Teachers Educators. India:Discovery Publishing House.Rashidi Azizan dan Adbul Razak Habib. (1998). Pengajaran Dalam Bilik DarjahKaedah dan Strategi. Masa Enterprise. Kajang. SelangorRaymond dan Daniel (1975). Age, Education, Job Tenure, Salary, Job CharacteristicAnd Job Satisfaction: A Multi Variate Analysis. Human Relation Journal. 8, 781 791.Reeves, D. (2006). The Learning Leader. Alexandria, VA : Association For Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment.Robiah Sidin, Juriah Long, Khalid Abdullah dan Puteh Mohamed (2001).Pembudayaan Sains dan Teknologi: Kesan Pendidikan dan Latihan di Kalangan Belia diMalaysia?. Jurnal Pendidikan, 27, 35-45Robiah Sidin. (2002). Konsep Guru Profesional.Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Profesion Perguruan.Bangi: Penerbibatan Fakulti, UKM.Rohana Zubir (1986). Aplikasi teknologi dalam pengajaran - pembelajaran sejarah : kesan danmasalahnya. Seminar Sejarah : Pendidikan Sejarah Kini dan Masa Depan. Universiti Malaya : KualaLumpur.Ronen, S. (1978). Job satisfaction and the neglected variable of job seniority, Human Relations,Vol.31, pp.297-308Rosser, V.J. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of theirworklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education. 46(1), 81-107.Rothmann, S. & Coetzer, E.P. (2002). The relationship between personality dimensions and jobsatisfaction. Bestuursdinamika, 11(1):2942.Rozainum Ahmad. (1997). Kepuasan kerja guru-guru sekolah menengah di daerah Seremban. Unpublishedmaster's research project, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Rozinah Jamaluddin (2005), Multimedia Dalam Pendidikan, Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn.Bhd. Cheras Kuala Lumpur.Said, Hamzah (1994) Kepuasan Kerja Guru dan Pensyarah Sains Pertanian di Sekolah Menengah danInstitut Pertanian di Semenanjung Malaysia. Masters thesis, Universiti Putra MalaysiaSamsuddin A. Rahim (1993). Komunikasi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.Sarimah Ismail dan Faridatul AkmarTalip (2010) Kepuasan Bekerja Staf Akademik Jabatan PendidikanTeknikal Dan Kejuruteraan, Fakulti Pendidikan, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, Skudai. pp. 1-7. (Unpublished)Satute, M. (2003) Kesediaan Guru-guru Bukan Opsyen Melaksanakan Program MPVdi Sekolah-sekolah Menengah Akademik Negeri Johor dan Melaka. UniversitiTeknologiMalaysia: Tesis Ijazah Sarjana MudaSayuti Bin Mat (2000). Kajian Faktor Pencapaian Teknologi Elektrik Di Dua Buah Sekolah MenengahTeknik Di Negeri Pahang. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447 479.Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (Chapter 7, pp. 117-141).Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Scriven, M. (1974). Evaluation: A study guide for educational administrators. Nova University.Shahril Bin Asan Barseni (2001). Kajian Kes Mengenai Hubungan Pendekatan Pengajaran YangDigunakan Oleh Guru-Guru Teknikal Dengan Personaliti Yang Mereka Miliki Di SMT Dato Sri Mohd.Zin Alor Gajah, Melaka. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.ShakilaYacob. 2010. Ilmu Sejarah Membina Negara. Utusan Malaysia. 19.10. 2010.Sharma, R.D., & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job satisfaction of university teachers: An empirical study.Journal of Services Research, 9(2).Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs for the study of teaching. InM.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Silverstein, B & Perlick, D (1995). The Cost of Competence, New York: Oxford University Press.Siti Hawa Abdullah (2008). Empati Sejarah Dalam Kalangan Murid Tingkatan 2.Universiti Malaya: Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah Pendidikan.Siti Salwa (2014). Pengajaran Guru Opsyen Dan Bukan Opsyen Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu SekolahRendah Di Batu Pahat. Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia: Tesis Ijazah Sarjana PendidikanTeknik dan Vokasional.Sivachandralingam Sundara Raja. Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd Rus, Ho Hui Ling, Noraini Mohamed Hassandan Nurul Asnida Abu Bakar. (2008). Sejarah Masih Relevan, Karisma Publication, Sdn Bhd.Smith, L.M. (1969). Group Processes in Elementary and Secondary Schools.Washington, D.C.: National Education Association of Classroom Teachers.Smucker, M.K. and Kent, A. (2004).'The Influence of Referent Selection on Pay,Promotion, Supervision, Work and Co-Worker Satisfaction Across Three District Sport IndustrySegments, International Sports Journal, Winter.Solis, A. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge: what matters most in the professional learning ofcontent teachers in classrooms with diverse student populations. Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) newsletter. http://www.idra.org [10 Julai 2010].Spector, P.E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes an Consequences. ThousandOaks, California: Sage PublicationsStake, R.E. (1967). The countenance of Educational Evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68,5)23-5)40.Stake, R.E. (2004). Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.Steinert Y, Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and Stinson, J.E. &Johnson, T.W. (1977). Tasks, individual differences, and job satisfaction. Industrial Relations,16(3):315-325.Stone, T. H. (1982). Understanding Personnel Management. New York: CBS College Publishing.Strydom, S.C. & Meyer, J.C. (2002). n Ondersoek na die bronne van werkstevredenheid en werkstresonder middelvlakbestuurders in die Wes- Kaap (An investigation of the sources of jobsatisfaction and work stress among middle-level managers in the Western Cape). South AfricanJournal of Industrial Psychology, 28(2):1522.Stufflebeam, D. L. (1972). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educationalaccountability. SRIS Quarterly, 5(1).Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M.Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications.(Chapter 19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Stufflebeam, D.L. (1987) Professional Standards for Assuring the Quality of Educational Programand Personnel Evaluations. "International Journal of Educational Research," 11(1), 125-143.Stufflebeam, D.L. (1987). Professional Standards for Assuring the Quality of Educational Programand Personnel Evaluations. "International Journal ofEducational Research," 11(1), 125-143.Stufflebeam, D.L., Folely, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond R.L., Merriman,H.O., & Provus, M.M. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.Suchman, E. A. 1967. Evaluative research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Suharsimi Arikunto dan Cepi Safrudin. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan:Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi AksaraTan Kwang How. (2002). Training and development human resources. Petaling Jaya:Management Consultant Sdn Bhd.Tan Sai Tian. 1998. The Effectiveness of Training Programmes as Perceived by Support Staff inUniversity Utara Malaysia. Universiti Putera Malaysia. Projek SarjanaTennant C et.al. 2002. The Design of a Training Programme Measurement Model.Journal of European Industrial Training Vol 26/5 p 230-240.Terry, D. (1974). Evaluation: A practical guide for teachers. New York : McGraw-HillThangaraj N Mohanasundram. (1998). An Evaluation of Training DeliveryEffectiveness of a Programme Conducted by Private Training Company. Universiti PuteraMalaysia, Projek Sarjana.Tillman, W.R., & Tillman, C.J. (2008). And you thought it was the apple: A study of jobsatisfaction among teachers. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 12(3), 1-18.Tomlinson, H. 2004. Educational leadership - personal growth for professional development. London:Sage Publications.Tunc, F. (2010). Evaluation Of An English Language Teaching Program At A Public University UsingCIPP Model . Middle East Technical University: TesisSarjanaTyler, R. W. 1950. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of ChicagoPressUlrich, R. S. (1991). Effects of health facility interior design on wellness: theory and scientificresearch. Journal of Health Care Design, 3: 97-109. [Reprinted in S.O. Marberry (Ed.), Innovations in Healthcare Design (pp. 88-104). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold,1995]Wall, V.D., and L.L. Nolan (1986), Perception of Inequity, Satisfaction and Conflict inTask-Oriented Group, Human Relations, 39(11): 1033 - 1052.Wan Ali, W. Z. (2000).MemahamiPembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication.Wan Nik Muda dan Wan Ruslim Ismail (2004). Theory Of Constraints For Education(Tocfe) Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Sejarah: Satu Pendekatan Inovatif. JurnalSejarah.Warr, P., Bird, M. & Rackham, N. (1970). Evaluation of management training. London: Gower Press.Watson, D. & Clark, L.A. (1984) "Negative Affectivity: The Disposition to Experience Advert,"Patchological Bulletin, Vol.96, pp465-490Wina Sanjaya. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan.Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and PracticalGuidelines. New York : Longman.Xia Ma dan McMillan, R.B. 1999. Influence Of Workplace Condition On Teacher Job Satisfaction.Journal Of Educational Research 93(1) : 39.Yahya Othman (2007). Bahan bantu mengajar memperkukuh Bahasa Melayu. Dewan Bahasa, 7(2), 32-35.YukI,G.A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5thed.). Upper Saddle River.Nr: Prentice.Zahara Aziz (2000). Beberapa strategi pengajaran berpusatkan pelajar dan kemahiran berpikir secarakritis dan kreatif di sekolah menengah di semenanjung Malaysia. international Conference onteaching and learning in 21st century, Putra Jaya. 24- 5 November.Zainal Abidin Abdul Wahid (1972). Sejarah Malaysia Sepintas Lalu.Kuala Lumpur:DewanZainal Kasim. (1997). Kepuasan kerja: Satu kajian guru wanita di sekolah menengah.Unpublished master's research project, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Zamrimi Binti Isyak, (2010). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kadar pusing ganti Kerja. John M.Ivancevich. Human resource management. 11th edition. McGraw-Hill/IrwinZhang, G., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Zeller, N., Misulis, K., Shea, D., & Williams, J. (2009,April). Assessing service and learning of a service-learning program in teacher education usingmixed-methods research. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association AnnualConference, San Diego,CA.Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Shea, C., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Misulis, K., Williams, J., &Knight, S. (2008). A 360 assessment of the multidimensional effects of aservice-learning program in teacher education using mixedmethods research. Paper presented atthe 8th International Research Conference on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, New Orleans, LA.

Penilaian program intervensi tambah opsyen (PITO) dalam kalangan guru Sejarah bukan opsyen di sekolah menengah

Similar Items