Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional
Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaianakademik dan penerimaan pelajar dalam pembelajaran kursus Computer PreventiveMaintenance terhadap m-pembelajaran di kolej vokasional. Dalam kajian ini, TeoriKeazaman Kendiri dan Model Penerimaan UTAUT (Unified Theory...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6383 |
Tags: | Add Tag |
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6383 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Roghdaryanti Hashim Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
description |
Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaianakademik dan penerimaan pelajar dalam pembelajaran kursus Computer PreventiveMaintenance terhadap m-pembelajaran di kolej vokasional. Dalam kajian ini, TeoriKeazaman Kendiri dan Model Penerimaan UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance andUse of Technology) telah digunakan untuk mengukur motivasi pelajar dan menguji tahappenerimaan pelajar terhadap penggunaan teknologi baharu, masing-masing. Kajian inimelibatkan lapan pemboleh ubah tidak bersandar, iaitu motivasi ekstrinsik, motivasiinstrinsik, jangkaan prestasi, jangkaan usaha, pengaruh sosial, keadaan kemudahan,keseronokan dan niat tingkah laku, dan pembolehubah bersandar adalah pencapaianakademik pelajar. Kajian kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk hubungan ini melibatkan satusampel kajian terdiri daripada 70 pelajar yang dipilih daripada 85 pelajar yang mengikutikursus Computer Preventive Maintenance di empat buah kolej vokasional di KualaLumpur dan Selangor melalui teknik persampelan rawak mudah. Dalam kajian ini, analisisstatistik deskriptif dan analisis inferensi yang dijalankan adalah berdasarkan ujian korelasiPearson dan kaedah analisis regresi berganda. Hasil kajian mendapati kesemuapemboleh ubah tidak bersandar mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan denganpencapaian akademik pelajar (p <.05) dengan nilai-nilai korelasi (r) berada dalam julatantara .54 dan .84. Namun, hanya motivasi instrinsik (? = .34, p <.05), keseronokan (? =.38, p <.05) dan niat tingkahlaku (? = .25, p <.05) menjadi faktor peramal yangmempengaruhi pencapaian akademik pelajar. Kesimpulannya, motivasi instrinsik lebihmempengaruhi pelajar berbanding motivasi ekstrinsik dan tahap penerimaan pelajarterhadap penggunaan m-pembelajaran dalam aktiviti pembelajaran adalah tinggi. Jelassekali, dapatan kajian ini mempunyai implikasi di mana m-pembelajaran perlu diterapkandalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran untuk membolehkan pelajar dapat mengikutiaktiviti pembelajaran dengan lebih aktif yang dapat merangsang minda mereka. Maka,pihak kolej vokasional perlu menyokong penuh kaedah m-pembelajaran ini denganmenyediakan kemudahan prasarana capaian internet dan peralatan yang bersesuaianuntuk mewujudkan satu persekitaran m-pembelajaran yang kondusif. |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Roghdaryanti Hashim |
author_facet |
Roghdaryanti Hashim |
author_sort |
Roghdaryanti Hashim |
title |
Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
title_short |
Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
title_full |
Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
title_fullStr |
Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional |
title_sort |
hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di kolej vokasional |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6383 |
_version_ |
1747833261028016128 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:63832021-10-28 Hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaian akademik dan penerimaan pelajar terhadap m-pembelajaran di Kolej Vokasional 2019 Roghdaryanti Hashim LB Theory and practice of education Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan hubungan antara motivasi dengan pencapaianakademik dan penerimaan pelajar dalam pembelajaran kursus Computer PreventiveMaintenance terhadap m-pembelajaran di kolej vokasional. Dalam kajian ini, TeoriKeazaman Kendiri dan Model Penerimaan UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance andUse of Technology) telah digunakan untuk mengukur motivasi pelajar dan menguji tahappenerimaan pelajar terhadap penggunaan teknologi baharu, masing-masing. Kajian inimelibatkan lapan pemboleh ubah tidak bersandar, iaitu motivasi ekstrinsik, motivasiinstrinsik, jangkaan prestasi, jangkaan usaha, pengaruh sosial, keadaan kemudahan,keseronokan dan niat tingkah laku, dan pembolehubah bersandar adalah pencapaianakademik pelajar. Kajian kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk hubungan ini melibatkan satusampel kajian terdiri daripada 70 pelajar yang dipilih daripada 85 pelajar yang mengikutikursus Computer Preventive Maintenance di empat buah kolej vokasional di KualaLumpur dan Selangor melalui teknik persampelan rawak mudah. Dalam kajian ini, analisisstatistik deskriptif dan analisis inferensi yang dijalankan adalah berdasarkan ujian korelasiPearson dan kaedah analisis regresi berganda. Hasil kajian mendapati kesemuapemboleh ubah tidak bersandar mempunyai hubungan yang signifikan denganpencapaian akademik pelajar (p <.05) dengan nilai-nilai korelasi (r) berada dalam julatantara .54 dan .84. Namun, hanya motivasi instrinsik (? = .34, p <.05), keseronokan (? =.38, p <.05) dan niat tingkahlaku (? = .25, p <.05) menjadi faktor peramal yangmempengaruhi pencapaian akademik pelajar. Kesimpulannya, motivasi instrinsik lebihmempengaruhi pelajar berbanding motivasi ekstrinsik dan tahap penerimaan pelajarterhadap penggunaan m-pembelajaran dalam aktiviti pembelajaran adalah tinggi. Jelassekali, dapatan kajian ini mempunyai implikasi di mana m-pembelajaran perlu diterapkandalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran untuk membolehkan pelajar dapat mengikutiaktiviti pembelajaran dengan lebih aktif yang dapat merangsang minda mereka. Maka,pihak kolej vokasional perlu menyokong penuh kaedah m-pembelajaran ini denganmenyediakan kemudahan prasarana capaian internet dan peralatan yang bersesuaianuntuk mewujudkan satu persekitaran m-pembelajaran yang kondusif. 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6383 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6383 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Abdellah Ibrahim, M. E., & Thouqan Saleem, Y. M. (2016). The Effect of Mobile Learning onStudents Achievement and Conversational Skills. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3),2031. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p20Ahmad, E., & Umi Khalthom, M. (2014). Pembelajaran Koperatif Di Malaysia: Pembangunan ProfesionalDalam Meningkatkan Pendidikan Sekolah Rendah. Prosiding Persidangan Antarabangsa Kelestarian Insan(INSAN2014), Batu Pahat, 2014(10 April 2014), 8392.Ali, R. A., Rafie, M., & Arshad, M. (2016). Perspectives of Students Behavior Towards MobileLearning (M-learning) in Egypt: an Extension of the UTAUT Model.Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 6(4), 11081113.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.61006Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile Applications Impact on Student Performance andSatisfaction. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 102112.Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students intention to usem-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 6571.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046Ariffin, S. A., Ismail, A., Yatim, M. H., & Sidek, S. F. (2018). An In-depth Assessment ofCulturally Appropriate Design for a University Mobile Learning Educational Website (MLearn): AMalaysian University Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and SocialSciences, 8(2), 535546. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i2/3821Ariffin, S. A., Sidek, S. F., & Mutalib, M. F. H. (2018). Preliminary Descriptive Insights intoStudent Generated Activities for STEM subjects through Mobile Learning in a Malaysian UniversityContext. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 523534.https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8- i2/3962Ariffin, S. A., & Malim, T. (2018). Towards a Smart Educational Environment Framework for mLearningin a Malaysian context, 7481.Barhoumi, C. (2015). The effectiveness of WhatsApp mobile learning activities guided by ActivityTheory on Students Knowledge Management. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 221238.https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms/2017/v4i1/8454Buletin Anjakan Bil.8/2015. Buletin Anjakan. Buletin Anjakan - Buletin Transformasi PendidikanMalaysia, 8, 69. Retrieved from http://www.padu.edu.my/anjakanChiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile LearningSystem to Improve Students Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science InquiryActivities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352365.https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2006.297800Chung, H., Chen, S., & Kuo, M. (2015). A study of EFL college students acceptance of mobilelearning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333339.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: An investigation of student motivation.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 8296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12036Citrix. (2017). Best Practices to Make BYOD, CYOD and COPE Simple and Secure, 110. Retrieved from https://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us/documents/white-paper/byod-best-practices.pdfDhingra, M. (2016). Legal Issues in Secure Implementation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD). ProcediaComputer Science, 78(December 2015), 179184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.02.030Dos, B. (2014). The Relationship Between Mobile Phone Use , Metacognitive Awareness and AcademicAchievement. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 192200.Figaro-Henry, S., & James, F. (2015). Mobile Learning In The 21st Century Higher EducationClassroom : Readiness Experiences and Challenges. Caribbean Curriculum, 23(2011), 99120.Garcia-Cabot, A., De-Marcos, L., & Garcia-Lopez, E. (2015). An empirical study on m- learningadaptation: Learning performance and learning contexts. Computers and Education, 82, 450459.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.007Hari, Y., Darmanto, & Elisa Yanggah, M. (2016). Tingkat Adopsi Inovasi Teknologi Sistem M-Learningdalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Mandarin pada Tingkat SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu& Call For Papers Unisbank (SENDI_U), (Seminar Nasional Multi Disiplin Ilmu), 103111.Herrera, S. I., Fennema, M. C., Morales, M. I., Palavecino, R. A., Goldar, J. E., & Zuan,S. V. (2015). Mobile Technologies in Engineering Education. Proceedings of 2015 InternationalConference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), (September), 11571164.Huang, Y. (2014). Empirical Analysis on Factors Impacting Mobile Learning Acceptance in HigherEngineering Education. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2751Internet Users Survey 2017 Statistical Brief Number Twenty-One. (2017), 151.Retrieved from http://www.mcmc.gov.myIqbal, S., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2017). What drives m-learning? An empirical investigation of universitystudent perceptions in Pakistan. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(4), 730746.https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1236782Issham, I., Siti Norbaya, A., & Thenmolli, G. (2016). Mobile Learning in Malaysian Universities:Are Students Ready? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 10(3), 17.https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i3.5316Jamilluddin, N. A., Jasmy, M., Rahman, A., & Razali, N. A. (2016). Pengadaptasian E-LearningKepada M- Learning Dalam Teknologi Pendidikan, 572580.Jayaseelan, V., Ganthan, N., Nurazean, M., Norziha, M., Bharanidharan, S., & Pritheega, M. (2016).Adopting Factors of Bring Your Own Device ( BYOD ) at the Selected Private Higher LearningInstitution in Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2(1),2432. Retrieved fromhttp://akademiabaru.com/doc/ARSBSV2_N1_P24_32.pdfJeno, L. M., Grytnes, J. A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool onbiology students motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self- DeterminationTheory perspective. Computers and Education, 107, 112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.011Khairah @ Asmaa Baharun, S. S. & M. F. A. G. (2017). Penerimaan M-Pembelajaran Dalam KalanganPensyarah Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia Melalui the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (Utaut): Satu Kajian Awal. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(2), 3246.Khairul Anuar, A. R., Muhammad Sukri, S., Yusri, K., & Norazrena, A. S. (2015).Masalah dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran bagi Kursus Teknologi Elektrik di Kolej Vokasional.International Education Postgraduate Seminar 2015, 8.Khaliliaqdam, S. (2014). ZPD, Scaffolding and Basic Speech Development in EFL Context. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 891897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.497Khechine, H., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and LearningObjects UTAUT Model for Blended Learning: The Role of Gender and Age in the Intention to UseWebinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 3352. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ijello.org/Volume10/IJELLOv10p033-052Khechine0876.pdfKhusnul, H., & Mohd. Helmi, A. R. (2017). Penggunaan Media Sosial dan Faktor-faktor yangMempengaruhi Terbentuknya Gerakan Sosial oleh Pemimpin Pelajar Universiti di Bandar Pekan Baru,Riau, Indonesia. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 12(2), 87101.Latifah, Z., Aidah, A. K., Mohd Hafiz, M. J., & Mohd Jasmy, A. R. (2016). Pembinaan InstrumenAmalan Penggunaan Facebook Bagi Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Menggunakan Model Rasch. Journal ofPersonalized Learning, 2(1), 104110.Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Relating motivation to information and communicationtechnology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 51,418428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021Legrain, P., Gillet, N., & Gernigon, C. (2015). Integration of Information and CommunicationTechnology and Pupils Motivation in a Physical Education Setting. Journal of Teaching in PhysicalEducation, 384401.Lemos, M. S., & Verssimo, L. (2014). The Relationships between Intrinsic Motivation, ExtrinsicMotivation, and Achievement, Along Elementary School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,112(Iceepsy 2013), 930938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1251Luan, C. W., & Mohd Jasmy, A. R. (2016). Tahap Penerimaan M-Pembelajaran Di Kalangan Guru SJKC KuenCheng 2. International Conference on Education and Regional Development 2016 (ICERD 2016),(November 2016),110116.Mahinderjit, M., Wai, C., & Zulkefli, Z. (2017). Security and Privacy Risks Awareness for BringYour Own Device (BYOD) Paradigm. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science andApplications, 8(2), 5362.https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080208Mahizer, H., & Mohd Azli, Y. (2016). Frog VLE (persekitaran pembelajaran maya) dalam pengajaran danpembelajaran: Penerimaan dan kaedah pelaksanaannya. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice ofTeachers & Teacher Education, 6(2), 6777.Retrieved from http://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/article/2016AR001298Maslin, M., Amirah, S. N., Nik Hasnaa, N. M., Wan Normeza, W. Z., & Nor Raihana, M. Al. (2016).Mobile Learning in Malaysia Education Institutions. Issues in Information Systems, 17(4), 152157.https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(86)90027-3Mohd Azli, Y., Wong, K. T., Noraini, D., & Noh, M. (2016). Pembelajaran Teradun: Satu tinjauanliteratur terhadap faktor- faktor penerimaan guru melalui model-model penerimaan. Journal ofResearch, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 6785. Retrieved fromhttp://pustaka2.upsi.edu.my/eprints/2369/1/Pembelajaran Teradun_Satu Tinjauan Literatur TerhadapFaktor_Faktor Penerimaan Guru Melalui Model_Model Penerimaan.pdfMohd Faizal Nizam Lee, A., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaiankendiri pembelajaran Geometri Tingkatan Satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1),211265.Mohd Paris, S., & Saedah, S. (2016). Analisis Keperluan Pembangunan Model Pengajaran M-PembelajaranMata Pelajaran Sejarah Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, Bil. 4(4),1224.Mohd Sahandri Gani, H., Noor Shah, S., Saifuddin Kumar, A., Mazura Mastura, M., & Husni Zaim, K. N.(2014). Transformation of Research Instrument Development in Education. US-China Education Review,4(10), 679687.Mostafa, A.-E., Hatem, M. E., & Khaled, S. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use ofmobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93 102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033Mouza, C., & Barrett-Greenly, T. (2015). Bridging the app gap: An examination of a professionaldevelopment initiative on mobile learning in urban schools. Computers and Education, 88, 114.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.009Murphy, A., Farley, H., Lane, M., Hafeez-Baig, A., & Carter, B. (2014). Mobile Learning Anytime,Anywhere: What Are Our Students Doing? Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 331345.https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i3.1098Nellie, I., Khaidzir, I., & Nur Saadah, M. A. (2016). Kesan Teknik Scaffolding Terhadap KemahiranMenyelesaikan Masalah Kanak-Kanak Prasekolah. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(2),96111.Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance andmotivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance.Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 8395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020Norashikin, A. B., Ramli, B., & Say Fooi, F. (2015). Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru dengan PencapaianAkademik Pelajar. International Journal of Education and Training(InjET), 1(2 November), 111.Nordin N.M., Embi M.A., Norman H., Panah E. (2017) A Historical Review of Mobile Learning Researchin Malaysia and Its Implications for Malaysia and the Asia- Pacific Region. In: Murphy A.,Farley H., Dyson L., Jones H. (eds) Mobile Learning in Higher Education in theAsia-Pacific Region. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 40. Springer, SingaporeNorhafiza, M. S., & Ku Azam, T. L. (2017). Penglibatan Komuniti Tempatan dalam KeusahawananPelancongan : Kajian Kes Pulau Perhentian, Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 3(1),103119.Pedrotti, M., & Nistor, N. (2014). Online Lecture Videos in Higher Education Acceptance andMotivation Effects on Students System Use. Proceedings - IEEE 14th International Conference onAdvanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2014, 477 479. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.141Pitts, K., Pudney, K., Zachos, K., Maiden, N., Krogstie, B., Jones, S., & Rose, M. (2015).Using mobile devices and apps to support reflective learning about older people with dementia.Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(6), 613631.Samaradiwakara, M. N., & Gunawardena, C. G. (2014). Comparison of Existing Technology AcceptanceTheories and Models To Suggest a Well Improved Theory/Model. International Technical SciencesJournal (ITSJ, 1(1), 2136.Shafinaz, A. M., Chua, Y. P., Hussein, A., Leong, M. W., & Shahrin, A. (2016).Kecerdasan Emosi Pengetua Dan Hubungannya Dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Menengah. JurnalKepimpinan Pendidikan, Volume 3(Issue 3), 5475.Shahril, I., & Tam, S. S. (2016). Penggunaan Artifak Dalam Zon Perkembangan Proksimal Semasa ProsesMenstruktur Ayat Bahasa Sepanyol. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1429.Sharifah Hasima, S. D., Jamal @ Nordin, Y., & Hamidah, Y. (2017). Kesahan dan KebolehpercayaanInstrumen Kajian Penyeliaan Berkesan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 5(3), 5061.Retrieved from http://juku.um.edu.my/index.php/JUKU/article/view/8227Sharma, S. K., Mohamed, S., & Hafedh, A. (2016). Development and validation of Mobile LearningAcceptance Measure. Interactive Learning Environments, 112.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224250Sharples M., Arnedillo-Snchez I., Milrad M., Vavoula G. (2009) Mobile Learning. In: Balacheff N.,Ludvigsen S., de Jong T., Lazonder A., Barnes S. (eds) Technology- Enhanced Learning. Springer,DordrechtShieh, C. J., & Yu, L. (2016). A Study on Information Technology Integrated Guided DiscoveryInstruction towards Students Learning Achievement and Learning Retention. Eurasia Journal ofMathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 833842.https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1554aSong, Y. (2014). Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) for seamless science inquiry in a primary school.Computers and Education, 74, 5060.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.005Song, Y., & Siu, C. K. (2016). Affordances and Constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) forLearning and Teaching in Higher Education: Teachers Perspectives. The Internet and HigherEducation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.004Toktarova, V. I., Blagova, A. D., Filatova, A. V., & Kuzmin, N. V. (2015). Design andImplementation of Mobile Learning Tools and Resources in the Modern Educational Environment ofUniversity. Review of European Studies, 7(8), 318324. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n8p318Topcu, S., & Leana-Tascilar, M. Z. (2016). The role of motivation and self-esteem in the academicachievement of Turkish gifted students. Gifted Education International, 116.https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416646192Uk Raai a/p Chen, Alias Masek, & Mohd Hasril Amiruddin. (2014). Kajian Gaya Pembelajaran DanMotivasi Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar Diploma Kejuruteraan Di Politeknik. CiE-TVET 2014, (8),117136.UNESCO Policy Guidelines for Mobile Learning. (2013). UNESCO Working Paper Series on MobileLearning. https://doi.org/ISBN 978-92-3-001143-7. FranceVallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Briere, N., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). TheAcademic Motivation Scale: A measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 10031017. https://doi.org/0803973233Ventakesh, V., G.Morris, M., B.Davis, G., & D.Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of InformationTechnology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425478.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Wan Idros, W. S., Nur Farhah, O., & Maizatul Haizan, M. (2017). Hubungan Pengkomunikasian BudayaOrganisasi dengan Prestasi Kerja Kakitangan Pelaksana Sektor Awam. Journal of Social Sciences andHumanities, 12(3).Wan Mohd Khairul, F. W. K., Mohd Yakub@Zulkifli, M. Y., Mohd Nordin, A. R., Mohd Sufian, M. D.,Asyraf, A. R., Fadzli, A., Nurfaizah, F. (2017). Learning Al-Quran Based on the Mobile Learning (M- Learning ): A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business andSocial Sciences, 7(4), 7080. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2780Wan Mohd Zaifurin, W. N., Nor Hayati, S., Sabri, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Penggunaan AnalisisFaktor bagi Kajian Hubungan antara Faktor- faktor Peramal dengan Kecenderungan Pelajar MenceburiKerjaya Keusahawanan. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 5(2), 293306.Williams, G. C., Niemiec, C. P., Elliot, A. J., LaGuardia, J. G., Gorin, A. A., & Rigby, C.S. (2014). Virtual Look AHEAD Program: Initial Support for a Partly Virtualized Intensive LifestyleIntervention in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 37(8), 169171. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0831Zahra, T., Amineh, A., & Maryam, M. (2015). The effect of m-learning on mathematics learning.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 8389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.092Zheng, J., Li, S., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Students Technology Acceptance, Motivation andSelf-Efficacy towards the eSchoolbag: An Exploratory Study. International Journalfor Infonomics, 10(3), 13501358. |