Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4
Kajian ini bertujuan menilai keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom (FC)terhadap pencapaian, minat dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Kajian juga turut menilai hubunganantara tahap interaksi sosial dengan pencapaian pelajar serta hubungan antara efikasikendiri dengan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuant...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6453 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6453 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Mohd Izyafifi Mohd Jaya Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| description |
Kajian ini bertujuan menilai keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom (FC)terhadap pencapaian, minat dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Kajian juga turut menilai hubunganantara tahap interaksi sosial dengan pencapaian pelajar serta hubungan antara efikasikendiri dengan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telahdigunakan di dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan subjek kajian dijalankan secara persampelan bertujuanmelibatkan 60 orang pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sastera yang mengambil mata pelajaran PendidikanSeni Visual (PSV) di dua buah sekolah dalam daerah Pekan. Sampel kajian dibahagikan kepada duakumpulan iaitu 30 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan 30 orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan.Tiga jenis instrumen kajian digunakan iaitu instrumen ujian pencapaian, soal selidik minat danmotivasi serta tatacara pembelajaran PSV berasaskan pendekatan FC. Analisis inferensi secaraujian-t sampel tidak bersandar, ujian t sampel bersandar dan ujian korelasi Pearson digunakandalam kajian ini. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa perbezaan terhadap pencapaian akademik secarasignifikan pada aras keyakinan 0.05 dengan min pencapaian akademik kumpulan rawatan (m=59.80) lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kumpulan kawalan (m=36.07), minat pelajardalam kumpulan rawatan meningkat daripada sebelum (m=3.31) kepada selepas rawatan (m=4.19) dantahap motivasi pelajar dalam kumpulan rawatan juga meningkat daripada sebelum (m=3.58)kepada selepas rawatan (m=4.61). Analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan wujud hubungan lemah(r=0.3) dan signifikan (p.05) antara tahap efikasi kendiri dengan pencapaian pelajar kumpulanrawatan. Kesimpulan daripada kajian menunjukkan bahawa pendekatan FC telah meningkatkanpencapaian, minat dan tahap motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran PSV. Seterusnya, secaratidak langsung memberi kesan positif dalam memperkasa elemen pembelajaran abad ke-21 terutamaelemen kolaboratif dan komunikasi, disamping meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi(KBAT) para pelajar. Melalui kajian ini juga terhasilnya tatacarapembelajaran PSV berasaskan pendekatan FC. |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Mohd Izyafifi Mohd Jaya |
| author_facet |
Mohd Izyafifi Mohd Jaya |
| author_sort |
Mohd Izyafifi Mohd Jaya |
| title |
Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| title_short |
Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| title_full |
Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| title_fullStr |
Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 |
| title_sort |
keberkesanan pendekatan flipped classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran pendidikan seni visual tingkatan 4 |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6453 |
| _version_ |
1747833265406869504 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:64532021-11-18 Keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom terhadap pencapaian, minat dan motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual tingkatan 4 2020 Mohd Izyafifi Mohd Jaya LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan menilai keberkesanan pendekatan Flipped Classroom (FC)terhadap pencapaian, minat dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Kajian juga turut menilai hubunganantara tahap interaksi sosial dengan pencapaian pelajar serta hubungan antara efikasikendiri dengan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telahdigunakan di dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan subjek kajian dijalankan secara persampelan bertujuanmelibatkan 60 orang pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sastera yang mengambil mata pelajaran PendidikanSeni Visual (PSV) di dua buah sekolah dalam daerah Pekan. Sampel kajian dibahagikan kepada duakumpulan iaitu 30 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan 30 orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan.Tiga jenis instrumen kajian digunakan iaitu instrumen ujian pencapaian, soal selidik minat danmotivasi serta tatacara pembelajaran PSV berasaskan pendekatan FC. Analisis inferensi secaraujian-t sampel tidak bersandar, ujian t sampel bersandar dan ujian korelasi Pearson digunakandalam kajian ini. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa perbezaan terhadap pencapaian akademik secarasignifikan pada aras keyakinan 0.05 dengan min pencapaian akademik kumpulan rawatan (m=59.80) lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kumpulan kawalan (m=36.07), minat pelajardalam kumpulan rawatan meningkat daripada sebelum (m=3.31) kepada selepas rawatan (m=4.19) dantahap motivasi pelajar dalam kumpulan rawatan juga meningkat daripada sebelum (m=3.58)kepada selepas rawatan (m=4.61). Analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan wujud hubungan lemah(r=0.3) dan signifikan (p.05) antara tahap efikasi kendiri dengan pencapaian pelajar kumpulanrawatan. Kesimpulan daripada kajian menunjukkan bahawa pendekatan FC telah meningkatkanpencapaian, minat dan tahap motivasi pelajar dalam mata pelajaran PSV. Seterusnya, secaratidak langsung memberi kesan positif dalam memperkasa elemen pembelajaran abad ke-21 terutamaelemen kolaboratif dan komunikasi, disamping meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi(KBAT) para pelajar. Melalui kajian ini juga terhasilnya tatacarapembelajaran PSV berasaskan pendekatan FC. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6453 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6453 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL Flipped Classroom Teaching Model: Effects on English Language Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Student Engagement and Satisfaction. Journal ofEducation and Practice, 7(9), 108-121.Azlina Rahman, Baharuddin Aris, Mohd Shafie Rosli, Hasnah Mohamed, Zaleha Abdullah, &Norasyikin Mohd Zaid. (2015). Significance of Preparedness in Flipped Classroom. Advanced Science Letters, 21(10), 33883390. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6514Badrul, & Nasruddin (2016). Amalan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 dalam KalanganPensyarah Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi 10, 1-25Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2017). The Holistic Impact ofClassroom Spaces on Learning in Specific Subjects. Environment and Behavior, 49(4),425-451.Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day.Eugene, OR: ISTE.Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., dan Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). TheTaxonomy of Educational Objectives The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I:Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/Braseby, A. M. (2014). The Flipped Classroom. Retrived Jun 15, 2017, fromhttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565291.pdfCapone, R., De Caterina, P., & Mazza, G. (2017). Blended Learning, Flipped Classroom anVirtual Enviroment: Challenges and Opportunities for the 21st Century Students. Proceedings ofEDULEARN17 Conference (pp. 10478- 10482). Barcelona, Spain.Chua, Y. P., Sharifah Md. Nor, Naim Mohd, & Wan Zah Wan Ali. (2003). Kreativiti Guru PendidikanSeni. Pertanika Journal Of Social Science And Humanities, 11(1). 11-17.Chua Yan Piaw. 2006. Kaedah Penyelidikan : Buku 1. Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill.Chua Yan Piaw. 2014. Kaedah Penyelidikan : Buku 1 (edisi ketiga). Malaysia: McGraw Hill.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitativeand qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Cronhjort, M., Filipsson, L., & Weurlander, M. (2018). Improved Engagement and Learning in Flipped-Classroom Calculus. Teaching Mathematics and itsApplications: An International Journal of the IMA 37(3), 113-121.DesLauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science 332(6031), 862-864.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2005). Kamus Dewan (Edisi keempat.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Edwards, S. (2015). Active learning in the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 46(5), 26-32.Esdal, L. (2016). Our Working Definition of Student Achievement and School Quality. Retrieved July 20, 2017, from https://www.educationevolving.org/files/Definition-Achievement-School-Quality.pdfFaust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom.Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9 (2), 3-24.Feldman, E. B. (1996). Philosophy of Art Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall N.J EducationalTechnology Publication.Garza, S. A. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and Its Use for InformationLiteracy Instruction. Journal of Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7-22.Gaughan, J. E. (2014). The flipped classroom in world history. History Teacher, 47(2),221-244.Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.),Handbook of Distance Education (3rd ed.) (pp. 333-350). New York, NY: Routledge.Green, T. (2015). Flipped classrooms: An agenda for innovative marketing education in the digitalera. Marketing Education Review, 25, 179-191.Grenfell, J. (2015). Blended Learning and the Flipped Classroom: The affordances of cloud based,located, and virtual world environments to support student learning. In D. Preuveneers (Ed.), Workshop Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (pp. 333-344). Amsterdam, Netherlands.Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: Theimportance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220227.Hod, Y. (2017). Future Learning Spaces in Schools: Concepts and Designs from the LearningSciences. Association for Educational Communications & Technology. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(2), 99-109.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0008-yJinks, J. & Morgan, V. (1999). Childrens perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventoryscale. The Clearing House, 72(4), 224-230.Johnson, G. B. (2013). Student perceptions of the Flipped Classroom (Masterdissertation). Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0073641Karanicolas, S., Snelling, C., Kemp, A. (2018). The University of Adelaide FlippedLearning Community of Practice. The Flipped Classroom Explained. Retrived Dis 18, 2018, fromhttps://www.adelaide.edu.au/flipped-classroom/about/Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2002. Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual KurikulumBersepadu Sekolah Menengah (2002). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2013. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013- 2025.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.Khalid, A. & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist Vs Traditional: Effective Instructional Approach inTeacher Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170-177.Lankford, L. A. (2013). Isnt The Flipped Classroom Just Blended Learning?. Retrieved Dis 18, 2018, from https://ileighanne.wordpress.com/?s=Blended&submit=SearchMarlowe, C. A. (2012). The Effect of The Flipped Classroom on Student Achievement and Stress (Masters Thesis), Retrieved fromhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/1790/MarloweC0812.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yMason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an invertedclassroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions onEducation, 56(4), 430435.Maxwell, C. (2016). What Blended Learning Is and Isn. Retrived Dis 18, 2018, fromhttps://www.blendedlearning.org/what-blended-learning-is-and-isntMohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Mohd Sheffie Abu Bakar. (1991). Metodologi Penyelidikan (Edisi Kedua). Bangi: Penerbit UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.Mok, H. N. (2014). Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of Information SystemsEducation, 25, 711.Moore, C. & Chung, C. (2015). Students attitudes, perceptions, and engagement within aflipped classroom model as related to learning mathematics. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(3),286-308.Neshyba, S. (2013, April 4). Its a flipping revolution. Retrieved Jun 12, 2017, fromhttp://chronicle.com/article/Its-a-flipping-revolution/138259/.Norashikin Abu Bakar, Ramli Basri, & Foo, S. F. (2015). Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru denganPencapaian Akademik Pelajar Norashikin. International Journal of Education and Training, 1(2),111.Norazilawati Abdullah, Noraini Mohamed Noh, Nik Azmah Nik Yusuff, & Rosnidar Mansoroleh. (2013).Aplikasi persekitaran pengajaran maya (frog vle) dalam kalangan guru sains. Jurnal PendidikanSains & Matematik Malaysia, 3(2),63-76.Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning especiallyfor low achievers, Technology in Higher Education, 13(33), DOI10.1186/s41239[1016[10032[1z.Nur Syaza Farha Diyazid, Shamsudin Othman, & Azhar Md Sabil. (2017).Penggunaan Kaedah Pembelajaran Koperatif Jigsaw Ii Terhadap Pencapaian Pembelajaran Teks Puisi Tradisional Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kolej Vokasional. Jurnal PendidikanBahasa Melayu-JPBM 7(2), 41-50.Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4thEdition. Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: Open University Press.Pedro, N. (2017). Redesigning Learning Spaces: What Do Teachers Want for Future Classrooms?International Conference Educational Technologies 2017 (pp. 5158). Sydney: Western SydneyUniversity.Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A Review of The Research. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 93(3), 223231.Rasidah Binti Rashid. (2007). Hubungan Antara Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Motivasi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Luar Bandar, Sabah (Tesis Sarjana). Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/6527/1/RasidahRashidMFP2007.pdfRivera, V. M. (2016). Flipped Classrooms: Advantages and Disadvantages from the Perspective of aPracticing Art Teacher (MSc in Visual Arts Education). Retrieved from https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/68691/Rivera_Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yRoehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: AnOpportunity To Engage Millennial Students Through Active Learning Strategies. Journalof Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil, & Mohammad Zohir Ahmad. (2017). Model Bersepadu Penerapan KemahiranAbad ke-21 dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 42(1), 1-11.Rosenberg, T. (2013), October 9). Turning education upside down. The New York Times. Retrieved September 27, 2016, fromhttp://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/09/turning-education-upside- down/Rothman, D. (2016). A tsunami of learners called Generation Z. Retrieved fromhttp://www.mdle.net/Journal/A_Tsunami_of_Learners_Called_Generation_Z. pdfSaban, Y. (2013). The Flipped Classroom Instructional Module. Retrieved Jun 10, 2016,from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/27174.Shaizatul, A. R., & Maisarah, M. S. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and ProblemSolving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172 (2015), 725-732.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.425jSharulnizam Ramli, Syed Alwi Syed Abu Bakar, & Sabzali Musa Khan. (2015). Cabaran yang Dihadapi Pendidikan Seni Visual dengan Kemunculan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi(ICT) di Malaysia. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 26(1), 81-93.Schawbel, D. (2014). Gen Z Employees: The 5 Attributes You Need to Know.Retrieved Jun 23, 2016, from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/236560Slomanson, W. R. (2014). Blended learning: a flipped classroom experiment. Journal of LegalEducation, 64, 110.Spears, L. R. (2012). Social presence, social interaction, collaborative learning, and satisfactionin online and face-to-face courses (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University).Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 3548436)Stofflett, R. T. (1998). Putting Constructivist Teaching into Practice in UndergraduateIntroductory Science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 1-13.Sulaiman, N. A. (2018). Implementing Blended Learning and Flipped Learning Models in TheUniversity Classroom: A Case Study. Teaching English with Thecnology, 18(4), 34-37.Teoh, C. & Wan, M. (2014). Flipping The Classroom for Digital Electronics, InternationalSymposium on Advances in Technology Education. Nanyang Polytechnic.Tinzmann, M. B., Jones, B. F., Fennimore, T. F, Bakker, J., Fine, C., & Pierce, J.(1990). What is the collaborative classroom? NCREL: Oak Brook.Tomas, L., Evans (Snowy), N., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for aflipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ,16(5), 1-22.Tucker, B. (2012). The Flipped Classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.Uk Raai Chen, Alias Masek, & Mohd Hasril Amiruddin. (2014). Kajian Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Motivasi Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar Diploma Kejuruteraan Di Politeknik. Proceeding Persidangan Pendidikan (Penyelidikan dan Inovasi) dalamPendidikan dan Latihan Teknikal dan Vokasional (CiE-TVET 2014) Kali ke-4 (pp. 117-136). Mersing, Johor, Malaysia.Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development ofchildren, 23(3), 34-41.Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2016). Does the Flipped Classroom Lead to Increased Gains on LearningOutcomes in ESL/EFL Contexts? CATESOL Journal, 28(1), 39- 67.Wulsin, L. A. (2013). Classroom Design-Literature Review. Retrieved Dis 19, 2018, fromhttps://www.princeton.edu/provost/space-programmingplannin/SCCD_Final_Report_Appendix_B.pdfYang, C. C. R. (2017). An Investigation of the Use of the Flipped Classroom Pedagogy in SecondaryEnglish Language Classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice,16, 1-20.Zaliza Mohamad Nasira & Zaitul Azma Zainon Hamzah. (2014). Sikap dan motivasi pelajar terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134. 408 415.Zhang, J. (2014). Reconstructing new space for teaching and learning: the futureclassroom. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Fong, J., Zhang, J., Kwan, R., Kwok, L.F. (eds.) ICHL2014. LNCS, vol. 8595 (pp. 4955). Springer, Cham.Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends fromdifferent fields of study. International Review of Research in Open andDistributed Learning, 17(3), 313340. |