Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peringkat kefahaman numerasi murid TahunEmpat berasaskan Model Kritikal Numerasi. Empat peringkat dalam Model PeringkatKefahaman Numerasi (MPKN) yang diaplikasikan dalam kajian ini ialah pentafsirankod, pemerolehan pengetahuan, aplikasi dan analisis. Responden kaj...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6466 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6466 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
QA Mathematics |
| spellingShingle |
QA Mathematics Siti Rahaimah Ali Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| description |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peringkat kefahaman numerasi murid TahunEmpat berasaskan Model Kritikal Numerasi. Empat peringkat dalam Model PeringkatKefahaman Numerasi (MPKN) yang diaplikasikan dalam kajian ini ialah pentafsirankod, pemerolehan pengetahuan, aplikasi dan analisis. Responden kajian terdiridaripada enam orang murid Tahun Empat dipilih berdasarkan keputusan ujianmatematik bulanan iaitu dua orang bagi setiap tahap; cemerlang, sederhana dan lemah.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kualitatif di mana temu duga dijalankan bagimengumpul data. Siri temu duga mengandungi lima tugasan telah diberikan bagimenentukan peringkat kefahaman numerasi responden. Hasil kajian mendapati,seorang murid berada pada peringkat aplikasi iaitu dapat menyelesaikan semua aktivitipembelajaran yang melibatkan konsep dan fakta matematik, memilih dan menentukanprosedur serta berkemampuan memberi alasan pada setiap jawapan yang diberikan.Tiga orang murid berada di peringkat pemerolehan pengetahuan. Keupayaan murid diperingkat ini ialah dapat menghuraikan fakta asas, menjelaskan, mendefinisikan danmerumuskan operasi yang digunakan dalam aktiviti pembelajaran. Selebihnya adalahmurid yang berada di peringkat pentafsiran kod, di mana pada peringkat ini merekadapat membaca, memahami, menyatakan terminologi matematik, menyenaraikanistilah, mengenal pasti konsep matematik, menggambarkan dan melukis idea-ideautama serta dapat mewakilkannya dalam bentuk rajah berdasarkan model MPKN.Hasil kajian juga mendapati terdapat empat kesilapan utama yang berjaya dikesanmelalui aplikasi MPKN iaitu tidak memahami soalan, kegagalan membuattransformasi, kesilapan kemahiran proses dan kecuaian. Kesimpulannya, MPKNmampu mengenal pasti peringkat kefahaman numerasi dan mengesan kesilapan murid.Kajian ini juga memberi implikasi terhadap keperluan penambahbaikan kaedahpenilaian kefahaman numerasi dalam kalangan murid di sekolah rendah melaluiMPKN. |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Siti Rahaimah Ali |
| author_facet |
Siti Rahaimah Ali |
| author_sort |
Siti Rahaimah Ali |
| title |
Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| title_short |
Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| title_full |
Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| title_fullStr |
Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| title_sort |
analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6466 |
| _version_ |
1747833266483757056 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:64662021-11-23 Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah 2014 Siti Rahaimah Ali QA Mathematics Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peringkat kefahaman numerasi murid TahunEmpat berasaskan Model Kritikal Numerasi. Empat peringkat dalam Model PeringkatKefahaman Numerasi (MPKN) yang diaplikasikan dalam kajian ini ialah pentafsirankod, pemerolehan pengetahuan, aplikasi dan analisis. Responden kajian terdiridaripada enam orang murid Tahun Empat dipilih berdasarkan keputusan ujianmatematik bulanan iaitu dua orang bagi setiap tahap; cemerlang, sederhana dan lemah.Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kualitatif di mana temu duga dijalankan bagimengumpul data. Siri temu duga mengandungi lima tugasan telah diberikan bagimenentukan peringkat kefahaman numerasi responden. Hasil kajian mendapati,seorang murid berada pada peringkat aplikasi iaitu dapat menyelesaikan semua aktivitipembelajaran yang melibatkan konsep dan fakta matematik, memilih dan menentukanprosedur serta berkemampuan memberi alasan pada setiap jawapan yang diberikan.Tiga orang murid berada di peringkat pemerolehan pengetahuan. Keupayaan murid diperingkat ini ialah dapat menghuraikan fakta asas, menjelaskan, mendefinisikan danmerumuskan operasi yang digunakan dalam aktiviti pembelajaran. Selebihnya adalahmurid yang berada di peringkat pentafsiran kod, di mana pada peringkat ini merekadapat membaca, memahami, menyatakan terminologi matematik, menyenaraikanistilah, mengenal pasti konsep matematik, menggambarkan dan melukis idea-ideautama serta dapat mewakilkannya dalam bentuk rajah berdasarkan model MPKN.Hasil kajian juga mendapati terdapat empat kesilapan utama yang berjaya dikesanmelalui aplikasi MPKN iaitu tidak memahami soalan, kegagalan membuattransformasi, kesilapan kemahiran proses dan kecuaian. Kesimpulannya, MPKNmampu mengenal pasti peringkat kefahaman numerasi dan mengesan kesilapan murid.Kajian ini juga memberi implikasi terhadap keperluan penambahbaikan kaedahpenilaian kefahaman numerasi dalam kalangan murid di sekolah rendah melaluiMPKN. 2014 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6466 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6466 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Abdullah Md Isa (2004). Penguasaan fakta asas darab di kalangan murid Tahun Dua. TesisSarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.Agnes, M. (2003). Numeracy in childhood. London: TIMES.Aida Suraya Yunus. (1996). Skim nombor perpuluhan bagi murid tahun lima sekolahrendah. Tesis Doktor falsafah. Universiti Malaya.Aida Suraya Yunus. (1999). Temuduga klinikal: Asas dalam mengenal pasti mood tentangsesuatu konsep. Jumal Pendidikan, 12-18.Aini Hassan. (2002). Penggunaan pelbagai teknik mendapatkan data kualitatif pengetahuanguru. In M. Yusoff, Penyelidikan kua/itatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian.Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Amin Salleh & Maheran Abu. (2001). Laporan pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: BahagianPerancangan dan Penyelidikan, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Amin Salleh, Maheran Abu & Faridah Abu Hassan. (2002). Matematik sekolah rendah.Kuala lumpur: Bahagian perancangan dan penyelidikan, Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Anderson, J. (1989). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: MA:Harvard UniversityPress.Anderson, J. (2010). Collaborative problem solving as modeling in the primary years ofschooling. In Kaur, B & Dindyal, J (Eds.), Mathematical applications andmodeling: Yearbook 2010, Association of Mathematics Educators, Singapore:World Scientific Publishing.Anghileri, J. (2000). Intuitive approaches, mental strategies and standard algorithms. InAnghileri (Ed). Principles and practices in arithmatics teaching. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.Anderson, J. (2014). Forging new opportumties for problem solving in Australianmathematics classrooms through the first national mathematics curriculum. InYeping, L. & Glenda, L. (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education,Dordrecht: Springer.Anghileri, J. (2000). Teaching number sense. New York: Continum InternationalPublication Group.Ann Gervasoni, L. P. (2008). Bridging the numeracy gap for students in low SEScmmunities: The power ofa whole school approach. Australia: Commonwealth ofAustralia.Anstey, M. (2003). Multiliteracies and the for resources model. Sydney: Prentice Hall.Anthony, G. & Walshaw, M. (2007). Characteristics of pedagogical approaches thatfacilitate learning for diverse learners in early childhood and schooling inmathematics.Journal Mathematics ofEducation.Ashley, C. (2007). Supporting numeracy: A Guide for school support staff. New York:Paul Chapman Publishing.Askew, M. & Brown, M. (2001). Teaching and learning prmary numeracy:policy.practice and effectictiveness. London: TTA.Askew, M. (2001). Policy, practise and principles in teaching numeracy. In P.Gates, JurnalIssues in mathematics-teaching, 105-119.Askew, M. (2002). The changing primary mathematics classroom-the challenge of thenational numeracy strategy. In L. (Ed), Aspects of Teaching SecondryMathematics: Perspectives on Practice London: Routledge Falmer.Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachersofnumeracy: report ofa study carried out for the teacher training agency. London:King's College, University of London.Asiah Ismail. (2004). Beberapa pola kesilapan dalam kefahaman konsep nomborperpuluhan dalam kalangan murid tingkatan satu. .Jurnal Pendidikan MatematikSains BP 1:10-13.Atkinson, P. C. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and cahanges.Walnut creek: CA: Alta Mira.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2010). Programme literacy and numeracy screening(LINUS). Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, (2010). Program Literasi dan Numerasi (Linus).Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Sekolah RendahBaker, A. & Baker, J. (2009). Natural math's strategies. Clayton South, Victoria: Blake.Baker, D. S. (2001). Understanding home school relations in numeracy. Proceeding oftheBritish Societyfor Research into Learning Mathematics. 2(2): 41-48.Ball D. C., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: whatmakes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5):389-407.Ball D. L. & Bass, H. (2000). Interwearing content and padagogy in teaching and learningto teach knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler Multiple perspective onmathematics teaching and learning (83-104). Westport: Ablex publishing.Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves pieces and twoths: constructing and using representationalcontexts in teaching fraction. In E. F. T.P Carpenter, Rational numbers: anintergration ofresearch (157-195). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Ball, D. L. (2002). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic researchand development program in mathematics education. USA: RANDEducation/Science and Teknology Policy Institute.Ball, D.L. (2003). What mathematical knowledge is necessary for teaching mathematics.USA: US Department of Education.Baroody, A. (2003). The development ofadaptive expertise andflexibility: The integrationof conceptual and procedural knowledge. In a Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds) thedevelopment of arithmetic concepts ans skills: Constructing adaptive expertise.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Baroody, A. (2000). Children, difficulties III subtraction: some causes and cure.Mathematics Teachers 32(3): 14-19.Bass, H. (2005). Mathematics, mathematicians and mathematics education. Bulletin of theAmerican mathematics sociaty. 42 (14): 417-430.Batanero, C. (2002). The role of models in understanding and improving statisticalliteracy. International Statistical Review, 70, 37-40.Behr, M. H. (1992). Rational number, ratio and proportion. In D.A Grouws. Handbook ofresearch on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Councilof Teachers ofMathmematics, 209-333.Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children withmathematical disabilities. Journal ofLearning Disabilities, 38(4), 333-339.Berg, B. (2005). Quaitative research methods for the social seciences. Boston: Allyn andBacon.Berteletti, I. L. (2010). Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental psychology46(2), 545-551.Biddlecomb, B., & Carr, M. (20 11). A longitudinal study of the development ofmathematics strategies and underlying counting schemes. International journal ofscience and mathematics education 9(1), 1-24.Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teachingfor quality learning at university (3fded). Berkshire:Open University.Bill, C. (2000). Metaphores and other liguistik pointers to children's mentalrepresentations. In proceding of the British Socialty for research in learning.Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Bateman, B. (2002). Fluency: Achieving true mastery in thelearningprocess.Bishop, M. A., Clements, C., Keitel, J., & Leung, F. K. (2003) Second internationalhandbook ofmathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Bishop. (2008). On the geometry of localization, tracking and navigation. Melbourne:Deakin University.Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of education objective: The classification of educationalgoals. London: Logman.Bobies, J. C. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children'smathematical thinking: Three Large scale cases. Mathematics Education ResearchJournal 16(3) ,27-57.Bobis, A. P. (2004). The Learning framework in number and its impact on teacherknowledge pedagogy. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Education &Training.Bobis, J. (2006). The learningframework in number and its impact on teacher knowledgeand pedagogy. Syedney: New South Wales Department of Education & Training.Bobis, J. (2009). The learningframework in number and its impact on teacher knowledgeand pedagogy. Syedney: New South Wales Department of Education & Training.Bogdan & Bilden. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theoriesand methods (4 ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Bogdan, (2003). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories andmethods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Bogdan, K. (2007). Qualitative research for education. Pearson: Ally & Bacon.Bonner, P.J. (2006). Transformation of teacher attitude and approach to math instructionthrough collaborative action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, SummerIssue 2006, 1-16.Booth, J., & R. Siegler. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmeticlearning. Child DevelopmentBrian Street, D. B. (2008). Navigating numeracy as home/school numeracy practices.Journal research Mathematics Education.Broody, A. J. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanicalknowledge of aritmetik. Hillsdale: NJ. Erlbaun.Brown, M. A. (2003). The key role of educational research in the development andevaluation of the National Numeracy Strategy. British Educational ResearchJournal 29(5) , 663-680.Brown, M.A. (2000). Effective Teaching of numeracy. Paper presented at the Highexpectations, outstandingBrown, M.A. (2000). What kinds of teaching and what other foctors accelerate promarypupil's progress in acquiring numeracy? ACER Research.Brownell, W. A. (1935). Psychological consideration in the learning and the teaching ofmathematics: The Teaching ofArithmetics.Bruner, J. (1960). Beyond the information given. Cambridge: MA:Harvard UniversityPress.Bulgar, S. (2003). Children's sense-making of division of fracton. Journal ofMathematicalBehavior, 22, 319-334.Bums, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods.. Australia: Pearson Education.Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: identificationand intervention. Zentral blattfiir didaktik der mathematic (ZDM) 42,527-539.Bynner, J. & S. Parsons. (2006). Does numeracy matter more? London: Institut ofEducation, University of LondonCaney, A. & Watson, J. M. (2003). Mental computation strategies for part- wholenumbers. Australian Association for Research in Education AARE 2003.Conference Papers: International Education Research Conference, 30 November - 3December 2003, Auckland, New Zealand EJ ISBN 1324- 9320.Carlson, R.E. (1990). Assessing teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: Itemdevelopment issues. Journal ofpersonal evaluation in education, 4, 157-173.Carpenter, T.P., Fenneman, E., Franke, M.L.Levi, & L., & Empson, S.B. (2008).Children's mathematics: cognitively guided instruction. Portmouth, NH:Heinemann.Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M., & Bebout, H. C. (1998).Representation of addition andsubtraction word problems. Journal for research in mathematics education, J9(4),345-357.Catheart, W. G., Pontheir, Y.M., Vance, J.H., & Bezuk, N.S. (2000). Learningmathematics in elemntary and middle schools. New Jersey: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.Catherine Sophian. (2009). Numerical knowledge in early childhood. Encyclopedia onearly childhood development. Jun 11,2009.Caygill, R, Marshall, N., & May, S. (2008). PISA 2006 Mathematical Literacy: Howready are our l i-year-olds for tomorrow's world.? Wellington New Zealand:Ministry of Education.Chamberlain, G. Chamberlain,M., & Walker, M. (2001). Trends in year5 students'mathematics and science achievement. Wellington New Zealand: Comparativeresearch unit, Ministry of Education.Chapman, A., Kemp, M., & Kissane, B. (1990).Beyond the mathematics classroom:numeracy for learning. In Chicago Press.Chiesa, M. & Robertson, A. (2000). Precision teaching and fluency training: Makingmaths easier for pupils and teachers. Educational Psychology in Practice. 16,297-310.54.Church, R J. (2008b). Critical variables which govem rate of leaming. In R. J. Church(Ed.), Introduction to Interventions: EDUC 621 Course Reader (pp. 191-200),University of Canterbury: School of Educational Studies and Human Development.Clacke. D., Gervasoni, A., & Sullivan, P. (2002). Early numeracy research project:Understanding, assessing and developing young children's mathematicalstrategies. Paper presented at the 2002 Conference of the Australian Associationfor Educayional Research in Education, Sydney, December 2002.Claire, A. H. (2012). Primary mathematical: knowledge and understanding. London:Achieving QTS Series.Clandinin. (2005). Personal Practices knowledge: A study of teachers'classroom images.Curriculum Inquiry 15(4) , 362-385.Clarke, (2004). Mathematics teaching in Grades K-2: Painting a picture of challenging,supportive and effective classrooms. In R.N Rubenstien & G. W Bright (Eds).Perspectives on the teaching of mathematics (66th Yearbook of the NationalCouncil ofTeachers ofMathematics. Reston,VA:NCTM.Clarke, B. (2001). Effects of fluency building in multiplication tables on the rate oflearning to factorise quadratic equations. Unpublished M.Ed. research project.University of Canterbury, Education Department.Clarke, B., Anstey, L., (2010), Perceived professionalleaming needs ofnumeracy coaches,Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics EducationResearch Group ofAustralasia,3 July 2010 to 7 July 2010, Mathematics EducationResearch Group of Australasia Inc. (MERGA Inc.), Fremantle, Australia, pp. 45-52.Clarke, B., Clarke, D., & Cheeseman, J. (2006). The mathematical knowledge andunderstanding young children bring to school. Mathematics Education ResearchJournal, 18(1), 78-102.Clarke, D. (2001). Understanding, assessing and developing young children'smathematical thinking: Research as powerful tool for professional growth. In J.Bobis, B. & Mitchelmore, M. (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond: Proceedings of the24thAnnual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group ofAustralasia (Vol. 1, pp. 9-26). Sydney: MERGA.Clarke, D. (2002). Understanding assessing and developing young children's mathematicalthinking: Research as powerful tool for profesional growth. In B. P. J.Bobis,Numeracy and beyond: Procesing of the 24th annual conference of themathematics education research group ofAustralia. Voloum 1 (pp. 9-26). Sydney:MERGA.Clarke, D. (2003) .. Num;racy and beyong (Proceedings of the 24th Annual Confeemce otthe Mathematics Education Research group of Australasia, Vol 1). Understandingassessinz and developing young children's mathematical thinking: Research aspowerfultool for profesional growth. In J. Bobis, B Perry & M. Mitchelmore (Eds).9-26.Clarke, D. M., Clarke, D. J., & Sullivan, P. (2012). Important ideas in mathematics: Whatare they and where do you get them? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom,17(3), 13-18.Clarke, D., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Gronn, D., Home, M., Mc D. A., Montgomery,P., Roche, A., Sullivan, P., Clarke, B. A., Rowley, G., (2002), Early NumeracyResearch Project Final Report, February, 2002, Department of Education,Employment and Training, Australia, 1-275.Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundation and model viability. In I.A. (Eds), Handbook of research data design in mathematical and scienceeducation ( 547-589). Mahwah: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Clement, M. (2004). How do children come to use a taught mental calculation strategy?Educational Studies in Mathematics 56(1) , 3-18.Clements, K & Ellerton, N.(2000), "Challenging the effectiveness of pencil-and-papertests in mathematics Melbourne: Deakin University.Clements, M. A. & Ellerton, N. (l996).The newman procedure for analysing errors 011written mathematical Tasks. Retrieved August 17th, 2008 from http://users.tpg.com.au larnold1 O/PAGES/newman.htmClements, M. A. & Ellerton, N. (2008).the newman procedure for analysing errors onwritten mathematical tasks. Retrieved August 17th, 2008 frornhttp://users.tpg.com.au /arnoldl O/PAGES/newman.hhnClements, M. A. (1980). Analysing children's errors on written mathematical tasks.inclements, M. A. & Ellerton, N. (1996).The Newman Procedure forAnalysingErrors on Written Mathematical Tasks.Retrieved August 17th, 2008 fromhttp://users.tpg.com.aulamold I O/PAGES/newman.hhnClements, M. A. (2004). Analysing errors made by pupils on written mathematicstasks. Sydney: University of Western.Cobb Paul & Leslie P. S. (2011). The constructivist research as teacher and model builder.A Journey in Mathematics education Research. 48(1)19-30.Cobb, Paul. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration ofunderstanding: an ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. In W.M. Roth, Mathematical Thinking and Learning (p. 75-110). London: Taylor'sFrancis.Cobb, P., Contrey, J., Disessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L., (2003). design experimentsin educational research. educational researc. 32(1), 9-13.Cobb, P. (1995). Intorduction: The coordination of psychological and socialogicalperspectives in mathematics education. In P. C. (Eds), The emergence ofmathematical meaning: Intractive in classroom cultures (pp. 1-17). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrance Erlbaum.Cobb, P. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. educational research 32(1),9-13.Coles. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics across the primary curriculum. London:Fulton.Colwell, S., Macrae, J., Boaler, M., Brown, & Rhodes, V. (2010). What do we know andwhat do we need do to know about adult numeracy and what should we do aboutit? In adult numeracy:review of research and related literature. 115-118.Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). National numeracy review report.. Conference onEducational Sciences, 15,961-965.Cooper, T. J. , Heirdsfield, A., & Irons, C. J. (1996). Children's mental strategies foraddition and subtraction word problems. In J. Mulligan & Mitchelmore, M. (Eds.),Children's number learning (pp 147-162)Cotter, T. A. (2000). Using language and visualization to teach place value. TeachingChildren Mathematics. 7(2), 108-114.Cowley, S. (2009). Teaching skill for dummies. London: A john Wiley and Sons, Ltdpublication.Cresswell, J. W. (2008a). Qualitative unquiry & research design: Choosing among fiveapproaches (2ed). London: Sage.Cresswell, J. W. (2008b). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating,quantitative and qualitative research (3 ed). New Jersey: Pearson.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. London: Sage publication.Darr, C., Neill, A., & Stephanou, A. (2006). Progressive Achievement Test: Mathematics:Teacher manual (2nd ed.). New Zealand: New Zealand Council for EducationalResearch.Darulsalam, G. H. (2007). Keesahan dan kebolehpercayaan dalam kajian kualitatif dankuantitatif. Bangi: Maktab Perguruan Islam Bangi.Dave, B . (20 I 0). Navigating Numeracies home/school numeracy practices. London: KingCollege.Dave, B., Streer, B., & Tomlin, A. (2001). Understanding home school relations innumeracy. In J. Winter (Ed.). Proceedings of the British Society for Research intoLearning Mathematics, (21) 2,41-48.David, A. P. (2009). Methods for teaching: promoting students learning in K-12classrooms 8 edition. New York: Pearson.Davis, G. H. (2003). What might a fraction mean to a child and how would a teacherknow? Journal ofmathematics behavior, 12( 1), 63-76.De, S. T. (2001). Quotient construct, inscriptional practices and instructional design..United States: Arizona state UniversityDEETYA (Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs) (1997).Numeracy + Everyone's business: report of the Numeracy Education StrategyDevelopment Conference. Adelaide: Australian Association of MathematicsTeachers.Department of Education & Skill. (2011). Literacy And Numeracy For Learning And Life.The National Strategy to Improve Literacy and Numeracy among Children andYoung People 2011-2020, Dublin.Department of Eductional and Training (WA) (2006). Literacy and numeracy review: .finalreport. Perth: Author.DETYA (Commonwealth Department of Education and Youth Affairs). (2000).Numeracy: A priorityfor all. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Dey, 1. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guidq for social scientist.London: Routledge.DFCSF (Department for Children, School and Families). (2007b). Teaching numeracy.TeacherNet: Department for Children, School and Families.Dietiker, L., Gonulates, F., & Smith III, J. P. (2011). Enhancing opportunities for studentunderstanding of length measure. Teaching Children Mathematics, 18(4), 252-259,Reston, VA.Doig, B., McRae, B., & Rowe. (2003). A good start to numeracy: Effective numeracystrategies from research and practice in early chi/hood. Canada: CanadianLanguage & Literacy Research Nexwork.Donovan, M. &. (2005). Jow students learn: History, mathematics and science in theclassroom board on behavioral, cognitive and sensory science and education.Washington D.C: National Academy Press.Dossey, J. A. (1997). National Indicators of quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.),Why Numbers Count.Dossey, J. A. Swafford, J. 0., Parmantie, M. & Dossey A.E.(Eds) (2003). Multi digitaddition and subtraction methods invented in small groups and teachers support ofproblems solving and reflection. In B. a. (Eds), The Development of aritmeticsconcepts and skill: construting adaptive expertise . Mahwah, HJ: LawrenceEarlbaum Associates.Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematicsdifficulties. Journal ofLearing Disabilities, 38 (4), 324-332.Duemer, L., Benitez, J., Hurst, 1., Juarez-Torrez, R., Teague-Smith, R., Collins, C.,Harrison, C., Jones, K., & Powers, T. (2002). The edification of successfulteachers: The role ofthe family. Education. 4:122.Dykstra, D. I. (2007). The challenge of understanding radical constructivism.Constructivist Foundations 2, 50-57.E.Whitin, D. J. (2011). Intergrating critical literacy and critical numeracy in K-8classrooms. New York: Natural Council of Teacher of English.Earle, L. W. (2003). Watching and learning 3. final report of the external evaluation ofengland's national literacy and numeracy strategies. Toronto: Ontario Institute forStudies in Education Unoversity.Eddie Gray. (2007). The number line as metophor of the number system: A case study ofaprimary school. United kingdom: University of Warwick United kingdom.Education Review Office. (2000). In Time for the Future: A Comparative Study ofMathematics and Science Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Education ReviewOffice.Egan, M., & Hengst, R. (2012). Software on demand: An early childhood numeracypartnership. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3).Eley, M. (2003). Teaching thinking during detailed planning and possible need to re-definethe role of higher level constructs like conception of teaching. 10th EuropeanAssoction for research on Learning Instruction. Italy.Ell, F. (2001). Strategies and thinking about number in children aged 9-11 years. Retrievedfrom http://www.tki.org.nz/r/asttle/pdfltechnical-reports/techreport17.pdf.Elly (2008). Doing qualitative research: circles within circles. Great Britain: The FalmerPress.Engelhard. (2002). The teacher's role in collective argumentation. Journal ofmathematicalBehavior, 423-440.Enns, J. T. (2004). The thinking eye, the seeing brain: Explorations in visual cognitif. NewYork: W.W.Norton & Company.Epstein, J. (2001). school, family and community partnerships. U.S.A: Westview Press.Erickson, F. (2011). Uses of video in social research: brief history. International journal ofsocial research methodology, 14(13), 179-189.Ernest, P. (2000). Teaching and learning mathematics. In P. &. V.Koshy, Mathematics forprimary teach. London: Routledge.Ernst, G. V. (2011). Radical constructivism and truth as disclosure. Journal educationaltheory. 6l.( 3),275-293.Ezbicki, K. (2008). The effects of a math-fact fluency intervention on the complexcalculation and application performance of fourth grade students. PhDdissertation, University of Massachusetts Amerherst: Education Department.Fahsl, A.J. (2007). Mathematics accommodations for all students. Intervention in Schooland Clinic, 42, 4, 198-203.Fan, S. P. (2010). Kefahaman murid tingkatan satu tentang pembahagian pecahan. TesisPhd.. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Farhana Mohamad Suhaimi. (2009). Skim Pembahagian Nombor Bulat Bagi Murid TahunEmpat. Tesis Phd. Universiti Malaya.Farkota, R. (2005). Basic math problems: The brutal reality! Bulletin: Learning DifficuliesAustralia. 37(3), 10-11.Fink, A. (2005). The survey handbook. USA: Sage Publication Inc.Flockton, L. & Crooks, T. (2002). Mathematics assessment results 2001. NationalEducation Monitoring Report 23.Foresman, S. (2004). Investigations in numbers, data and space: Building number senseGrade 1. Cambridge: Massachusetts: Glenview.Fosnat, C. T. (2007). Mini lessons for extending addition and subtractions a year longresource contexts for leaning, K-3. Portsmounth: NH Heinemann.Fosnot, C. T. & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing numbersense, addition, and subtraction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Press.Fraenkel & Wallen (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6 ed). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Frankenstein, M. (2001). Reading the world math: Goals for a critical matemathicalsliteracy curriculum. In proceding of the eighteenth biennial conference of theAustralia Association of math teachers Inc. Mathematicians: shaping Australia (53-85). Canberra: AAMT.Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Intraction and practise. London:Sage publication.Friedlander, (2001). Promoting multiple representations in algebra. In A. C. (Ed), The roleoJrepresentation in school mathematics 2001 yearbook of the National Council ofTeachers of Mathematics (173-174). Reston VA: National Council of TeacherMathematics.Furner, J. & Berman, B. (2003). Math anxiety: Overcoming a major obstacle to theimprovement of student math performance. Childhood Education. 79(3), 170-175.Fuson, K. C., Grandau, L. & Sugiyama, P.A. (2001). Achievable numerical understandingfor all young children. Teaching children mathematical, 7(9), 522-526.Fuson, K. C. & Briars, D. J. (2000). Using a base-ten bloks learning/teaching approach forfirst and second-grade place value and multi-digit addition and subtraction .JournalJor research in mathematics education 21, 180-206.Fuson, K.C. (2003). Developing mathematical power in whole number operation. In J.Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin a& D. Schiffer (Eds). A research companion to principlesand standards for school mathematics, pp. 68-98.Reston, VA:National Council ofTeacher of Mathematics.Gagne, R. M. (1977). Conditions ojlearning (3rd). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Gal, I. (2002). Adult numeracy development:theory, research, practice. Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.Gay, L. R. (2003). Educational research: CompetenceJor analysis and application (7 ed).Upper Saddle River.Gay, L. R. (2006). Educational research: Competencies Jor analysis and application.Merrill: Prentice Hall.Geary, D. (2000). The development of numerical and arithmetical cognitif: A longitudinalstudy of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal ofExperimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.Geary, D. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem solving differences andcognitive deficits. In H. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook oflearning disabilities (pp. 199-212). New York: Guilford Press.Geary, D. (2004).Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal ofLearning Disabilities,37,4-15.Geary, D. (2006).Development of mathematical understanding In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler(Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 777-810). Hoboken, N.J.: JohnWiley and Sons.Gelman, (1978). The child's understanding of numbers. Cambridge: MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Gerdes, D. A., & Conn, J.H. (2001). A user-friendly look at qualitative researchmethods.Physical Educator, 58(4), 183-191.Gervasoni, A. & Sullivan, P. (2007). Assessing and teaching children who have difficultylearning arithmetic. Educational & child psychology 24(2), 40-53.Gess, N. (2000). Comments on "Educating teachers" papaer set: expanding questions andextending implications. Science Education, 83, 385-39l.Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for youngchildren: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report of the Society forResearch in Child Development, 22,3-22.Ginsburg, L. (2008). Instructional straregies for adult numeracy education. Adult numeracydevelopment:Theory, research. practise, 89-114.Ginsburg, L. Manly, M., & Schmitt, MJ (2006). The component ofnumeracy. Cambridge,MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Leaning and Literacy.Glaserfeld, E.V. (1989). Abstraction, re-presentation and reflection an interpretation ofexperience and Piaget's approach. Education Resources Information Centre(ERIC).Glaserfeld, V. (1987a,b). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. (ed), Problem ofrepresentation in the teaching and learning ofmathematics. London: Erlbaum.Glasersfeld, E. V. (2011). Radical constructivm and truth as disclosure. In C. W.Joldersma, Educational theory, 61,(3), 275-293.Graeber, A. & Tirosh. D.(2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teachingclassroom practice. En AJ.https:llktl.jyu.fi/img/portal/6127/Ch18_fmal.pdf?cs=1151568351Graeber, A., & Tirosh, D. (1991 ).The effect of problem type and common misconceptionson preservice elementary teachers' thinking about division. School Science andMathematics, 91, 157-164.Graeber, A. (2000). Forms of knowing mathematics: what preservice teachers shouldlearn. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1-3), 189-208.Greer, B. (2002) What is mathematics for? The mathematics educator. 13 (2),2-6.Griffin, S. (2004). Teaching Number Sense. Educational Leadership. 61 ,39-42.Groves, S., Moussley, J., & Forgasz, H. (2006). Primary numeracy: A mapping, reviewand analysis of Australian research in numeracy learning at the primary schoollevel. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training, Commonwealthof Australia.Hassan Faroi (2008). Kajian kes tentang pola kesilapan murid tahun tiga yang lemahmenyelesaikan masalah bercerita dalam matematik. Tesis Phd. Universiti Malaya.Haylock, (2007). Key concepts in teaching primary mathematics. Los Angeles: SagePublications.Haylock, D. (2001). Numeracyfor teaching. New York: Paul Chapman Publishing.Heather, C. H., Brain, R., Deborah, L., & Ball. (2005). Effects of teachers mathematicalknowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational ResearchJournal. 42,371-406.Heaton, R.M. (2000). Teaching mathematics to the new standards: relearning the dance.New York: College Press.Heirdsfield, A. N., & Cooper, T. 1. (2004a). Factors affecting the process of proficientmental addition and subtraction: Case studies of flexible and inflexible computers.Journal ofMathematical Behavior, 23, 443-463.Heirdsfield, A. N., & Cooper, T. 1. (2004b). Inaccurate mental addition and subtraction:Causes and compensation. FOCllS on learning problems in mathematics, 26(3), 43-66.Heirdsfield, Ann M. (2000). Mental computation: Is it more than mental architecture?Sydney: Australian Association for Research in Education.Heneron, M. E., Morris, L. L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987).How to Measure Attitudes.United States of America: Sage.Hiebert, 1. T. (2000). Learning and teaching with understanding. In. D.A. Grouws (ed),Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of theNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics . 65-97.Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and prosedural knowledge in mathemamatics: Anintroductory analysis. In I. J. (Ed), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: Thecase ofmathematics (pp. 1-27). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hiebert, J., & Weame, D. (2003).Developing understanding through problem solving. InH. L. Schoen (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6 - 12(pp. 3-13). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Higgin, J. (2001). An evaluation of the advanced numeracy project. New Zealand:Wllington, Ministry of Education.Higgin, J. (2002). An evaluation of the advanced Numeracy Project. New Zealand:Wellington, Ministry of Education.Higgin, J. (2003). An evaluation of the advanced numeracy project. New Zealand:Wllington, Ministry of Education.Higgins, J. (2001). An Evaluation of the Year 4-6 Numeracy Exploratory Study.:Exploring Issues in Mathematics Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry ofEducation.Hill, H. R. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on studentachievement. america educational research journal 42(2) ,371-406.Hill, H. C., Rowan,B. & Ball D. C. (2005). Effects of teacher's mathematical knowledgefor teaching on student achievement. America educational research journal 42(2) ,371-406.Hoffer, A. (2000). Geometry is more than proof. The mathematics teacher, 11-18.Hoffman (2000). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. New York: W.WNorton & Company.Hogan, J. (2000). Numeracy-Across the curriculum? The Australian Mathematics teacher,56(3) , 17-20.Hughes, C. (2004). New times? New Learners? New voices? Towards a contemporarysocial theory of learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 25(3), 395-408.Hughes, P. (2002). A model for teaching numeracy strategies. In Barton, B., Irwin, K. M.,Fannkuch, P., & Thomas, M. (Eds). Proceding ofthe zs" annual conference of themathematics education research Group of Australia: Mathematics educations inthe South Pacific. 147-157. Auckland.Hughes, P. (2002). A model for teaching numeracy strategies. In Barton, B., Irwin, K. C.,Pfannkuch, M., & Thomas, M. O. J. (Eds.).Mathematics Education in the SouthPacific (Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics EducationGroup of Australasia, Auckland, 350-357. Sydney: Mathematics EducationResearch Group of Australasia.Huitt, W. (2011). Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta: Valdosta UniversityState.Humphries, R. (2010). A study of the developmental sequence for mathematical numberskills in Year 6 and 7 children. Master'is thesis. University of Canterbury, Schoolof Educational Studies and Human Development.Hunting, R. P. (2007). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research andpractice. Journal ofMathematics behavior, 16(2), 145-165.Imre Csiszar, J. N. (2011). Information teory: coding theorems for discreta memorylesssystems (2ed). Cambridge University Press.In C. S. Lim, F. Saleh, M. Ghazali, H.Sulaiman, H. M. Yunus, W. L. Gan, & T. Y. Hwa (Eds.), International StudentAssessment. Wellington, New Zealand: Comparative Education Research Unit.Irwin, K. (2003). An Evaluation ofthe Numeracy Projectfor Years 7-10, 2002.Wellington,New Zealand: Ministry of Education. 102Irwin, K. (2003). exploring issues in mathematics education, an evaluation of thenumeracy project for years 7-10 2002. Wellington: Learning Media.Irwin, K. C., & Britt, M. S. (2005). The algebraic nature of students' numericalmanipulation in the New Zealand Numeracy Project., 58,169-188.Ishak, N. M. (1999). An analysis ofparential and peer attachment and its determinantfactors- a test of attechment theory on Malaysian students stuying atuniversitiesbin the United States ofAmerica. Tesisi Ph.D. Machingan: Universityof Westem .Izsak, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognitionand instruction, 26,95-143.J.Learn, D. (2005). Early Identification and intervention for students with mathematicsdifficulties. Journal oflearning disablities, 325-332.J.Clandinin. (1985). Personal practical knoelwdge: A study of teachersclassroom image.Curriculum Inquairy 15(4), 361-385.Jack Fraenkel. (2011). How to desingn and evaluate research in education, 8th edition.San Francisco: Me Graw-Hill.James H. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: principle and practice for effectiveinstruction (3 ed). New York: Pearson.Jamilah Kamal. (1994). Kajian tentang pencapaian matematik Tahun 3 di Sek. RendahSimpang Renggam. Kuala Lumpur:University Malaya.Jamaludin Mohamad Rashid (2003). Diagnosis jenis kesilapan dalam pembelajarankebarangkalian dikalangan pelajar. Tesis Phd. Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia.Jane, W. (2008). Developing critical numeracy across the curriculum , TasmaniaDepartment of Education: University of TasmaniaJeremy, K. J. S. (2002). Adding it up: Helping Chidren Learn Mathematics.Jessie, E., Khoon, Yoong, W., & Pirjo, A. (2010). Numeracy of young children inSingapore, Beijing & Helsinki. Early chilhood education journal. 33(5), 325-332.Johari Hassan & Norsuriaoi Aziz (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minatterhadap matematik di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah di Johor. Slrudai:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Johnson, N. (1998). A descritive study ofnumbers sense and related misconceptions aboutselected rational number concepts exhibited by prospective elementary teachers..South Florida: University of South Florida.Johnson, H, M. M. (2004). Classroom Assessment: Principle and practice for effectiveinstruction (3 ed). New York: Pearson.Jorgensen, N. (2009). Participant observation: Methodologyfor human studies. Newbury:CA: Sage.Jung, M., Kloosterman, P., & McMullen, M. B. (2007). Young children's intuition forsolving problems in mathematics. Young Children, 62(5), 50-57.Kalitatidou, E. (Feb 2008). Design of activities on numerical representations based oncognitifresearch. Journal Research Mathematics Education, 14, (6.) 355.Karen, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A Grouws (ed) .Handbook ofresearch 011 mathematics teaching and learning ,390-419.Kavale, K. & Forness, S. (2000). What definitions ofleaming disability say and don"; say:A critical analysis. Journal ofLearning Disabilities. 33(56),239-256.Kaygin, R, Balcin, 8., Yildiz, C., & Arslan, S. (2011). The effect of teaching theKelly & Lesh. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and scienceeducation. }.elahwah.N.1:La\vrence Erlbaum Associates.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (1983). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Rendah: HuraianSukatan Pelajaran Matematik Tahun 4. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Matematik KBSRTahun 4. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Matematik Tahun 4.Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2010). Kupasan mutu jawapan UPSR 2010. Rawang:Intiprint.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2011). Laporan prestasi UPSR. Kuala Lumpur:Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia Malaysia. K. P. (2003a). Kurikulum Bersepadu SekolahRendah: Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Matematik Tahun 4. Kuala Lumpur: PusatPerkembangan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Manual Am-NKRA. Instrumen SaringanNumerasi (Lisan dan Bertulis). Manual Am Numerasi Saringan 1 Tahun 1Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2000). Kajian antarabangsa sains dan matematik -ulangan. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan DasarPendidikan.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2010). Bengkel kajian semula pelan indukpembangunan pendidikan . Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2010). Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh:Bab 5,Membangun dan Mengekalkan Model Insan Bertaraf Dunia. Kuala Lumpur:Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kemp, M. (1995). Numeracy across the tertiary curriculum. Paper presented at theRegional Collaboration.Kemp, M. (2005). Developing critical numeracy at the tertiary level. Digital thesis,Murdoch University Library.Kemp, M., & Kissane, B. (1990). Numeracy: a tool for learning. United Kingdom:Research Centre for Technology Enhance Learning.Kemp, M., & Lake, D. (2001). Choosing and using tables. The Australian MathematicsTeacher, 57(3),40-44.Kelly, E., & Lesh, R. (Eds) (2000). The handbook of research design in mathematics andscience education. Hillsdale, N.J.Erbaun.Killion, K & Steffe, L.P. (2002). Children's multiplication : In D. C. (Eds), Puttingresearch into practice in the elementary grades reading from jourbals the NCTM(20-92). Madison: Wisconsin Centre for education research.Kilpatrick, J., Swafforce & Findell, B. (2001). All adding it up: Helping children learnmathematics. Washingston DC: National Academic Press.Kissane, B. (1991). On the interpretation of information in tables. Paper presented at theMathematics.Koop, A. (2003). An evaluation of the Sunrise* Numeracy Initiative. Unpublished Report.NSW DepartmentofEducation and Training, Sydney, February, 2003.Lake, D. (1999). Helping students to go SOLO: teaching critical numeracy III thebiological sciences. Journal ofBiological Education, 33(4),191-198.Lake, D. (2002). Critical social numeracy. The Social Studies, 93(1),4-7.Lamon, S. J. (2001). Presenting and representing: from fraction to rational numbers. In A.C. (Ed), The role of representation in school mathematics 2001 yearbook of theNational Council of Teachers ofMathemamatics ( 173-174). Reston VA: NationalCouncil of Teachers of Mathematics.Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Journal ofMathematics Teacher Education. 3(2), 187-199.Lassah, M. (2011). Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools. Teaching ChildrenMathematics. 17( 7), 443.Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2011). Analisa prestasi dan gred purata matematik.Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperikasaan Malaysia.Lesh, R., & Hare1, G. (2003).Problem solving, modelling and local conceptualdevelopment. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2 & 3), 157-189.Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester, Jr.,(Ed.), The handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2nd ed.(pp. 763-804). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, andCharlotte, NC: Information Age.Lerman, S, (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education.Journal Making Sense ofMathematics Teaching Education, 33-52.Liane, K.. (2003). Evaluation of a numeracy intervention program focusing on basicnumerical knowledge and conceptual knowledge: a pilot study.Austria: UniversityChildren's Hospital.Ling, G. W., & Ghazali, M. (2007). How year 5 pupils generalize patterns: Their strategiesand justifications.Littler, A. D. (2008). Mathematical Misconceptions: A Guide Jar Primary Teachers.London: Sage Publications.Ludlow, A. S. (2004). Metaphor and numerical diagrams in the arithmetical activity of afourth grade class. Journal Research Mathematics Education, 35,34.Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (2008). A map of possible practise: futher notes on the fourresource model practically primary. Journal Research Mathematics Education,4(2),5-8.Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (2009). Critical numeracy, Numeracy in the news, Australia;Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.Lyon, G., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L., & Chhabra, V. (2006). Learning disabilities. In E. Mash& R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment oj childhood disorders (3rd ed.) (512-591). NewYork: Guilford Press.Mariam, K. (2005). Developing critical numeracy at the tertiary level. Thesis Doctor ofEducation. Murdoch University.Marilyn, F. (2001). Reading the world with math: Goals Jar a Critical mathematicalLiteracy Curicculum, United States: University of Massachusetts.Marry, M. H., Nancy, T., Edwards, G., Bitter, G., Jean, M. (2007). Mathematics MethodsJor elementary and middle school teachers. Wiley.Marshall, C. & Rosman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research.. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publication.Martin. (2008). What kinds oj teaching and what other Jactors accelerate primary pupil'sprogress in acquiring numeracy?ACER Research.Martin, K. (?008). The Intersection of aboriginal knowledge, aboriginalliteracies and newleaming pedagogy for aboriginal students. In A. (Ed), Multiliteracies and diversityin education (59-81). Sourth Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Marzita Puteh & Wan Yusuf. (2010). Buku teks matematik tahun 1 sekolah rendah. Jilid 1.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka & Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Marzita Puteh, W. Y. (2010). Matematik Tahun 1 Sekolah Kebangsaan Buku Teks KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. Ed. ke-2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences - 3rd World.Matthijsse, W. (2000). Adult numeracy at the elementary level: Addition and subtractionup to 100. In G. Iddo, Adult Numeracy Development: Theory.research, practise133-155). UK.Mayer, R. (2005). Conceptual understanding versus computational skill. In J.M. Roger(ed)The cognitif revolution educational psychology. 105-118.Mazzocco, M. & Devlin, K. (2008). Parts and holes": Gaps in rational number senseamong children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. DevelopmentalScience, 11, 681-691.Me Diarmid, G. W. (1989). Why Staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subjectspecific pedagogy. In M. R. (Eds), knowledge base for the beginnig teachers (pp.193-205). Oxford UK: Pergamon.Me Millan. (2004), G. B. Why staying one chapter ahead doest really work. In M. R. (Ed),Knowledge base for the biginning teacher (pp. 193-205). Oxford.McLead, B. Douglas. (2002). Information processing theories and mathematics learningthe role of affect. International Journal ofeducational Research Volume 14 issue 1,13-29.McLellan, J. (1895). The psychology ofnumber and its application to methods ofteachingaritmetic. New York.McMillan, J. (2004). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effectiveinstruction (3rd ed). New York: Pearson.McRae, D, Arisworth, Geoff, Hughes, Paul, Mike. (2002). Managing numbers: numeracywhat works? Canberra: Department of education, Science and Training.Meng, C. C. (2007 ). Form on student's learning of solid geometry in a phase-basedinstructional enviromen using the geometri skatchpad. Kuala Lumpur: UniversitiMalaya.Mercer, C. & Miller, S. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math toacquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education,13, 19-35.Merriam, S. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.Merriam, S. (2002). Case study. DIm S.B Merriam (ed), Qualitative research in practice:Example for discussion and analysis. 178-180.Merriam, S. (2003). Qualitative research and case study research in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research & case study applications in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey - Bass Pub.Ministry of Education (2001). Curriculum Update (45): The numeracy story. Retrievedfrom http://www.tki.org.nz/r/govemance/curric_ updates/curr_updateO 1_e.php.Ministry of Education (2004d) Book 3: Getting Started. Numeracy ProfessionalDevelopment Projects. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education (2005 d). Book 5 teaching addition, subtraction, and place value.Wellington: Ministry ofEducation.Ministry of Education (2005). The number framework. Wellington, New Zealand:Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education (2007a). Ministry of Education starts dyslexia work programme.Retrieved from http://www.dyslexiafoundation.org.nz/pdfldfnz_moe_ oct2.pdf.Ministry of Education (2007a, 2007b). The number framework. Wellington, New Zealand:Learning Media.Ministry of Education (2007b). The number framework: Revised edition. Wellington, NewZealand: Ministry of Education .Ministry of Education (2009a). Mathematics achievement: Primary schooling. Wellington,New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education (2009b).The New Zealand Curriculum: Mathematics standards foryears 1-8. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Ministry of Education (2010). Special Education Policy. Wellington, New Zealand:Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education.(2004a). National Administration Guidelines. Wellington, NewZealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education.(2004b). Book I.The Number Framework. Numeracy ProfessionalDevelopment Projects. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education.(2004c). Book 2.The Diagnostic Interview.Numeracy ProfessionalDevelopment Projects. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education. (2004f) The School and Classroom Context for Year 9 Students'Mathematics and Science Achievement: Results from New Zealand's participationin the repeat of the Third International Mathematics & Science Study. Wellington,New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Ministry of Education. (2007a). The numberframework. Learning media. Wallington.Mirela, W. & Paul, G, (2013). How students solve problems in spatial geometry whileusing a software application for visualising 3D geometri objects. Journal ofcomputer & science Teaching. 32(1), 89-120.Mitchelmore, M. &. (2000). Teaching for abstraction: reconstructing constructisim. In l.&. (Eds), Mathematics education beyong 2000 (procedings of the 23rd annualconference of mathematics education research group ofAustralia (pp. 432-439).Perth: MERGA.Miura, 1. T. (2001).The Influence of Language on Mathematical Representations. InCuoco, A. A. and Curcio, F. R. (Eds.), The Roles of Representation in SchoolMathematics, Reston (53-62). VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Marohaini Yusoff (2001). Pertimbangan kritikal dalam pelaksanaan kajian kes secarakualitatif. Dalam Marohaini YlISOff. Penyelidikan kualitatif. pengalaman kerjalapangan kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Mohd Johan Zakaria (2002). Perkaitan antara pendekatan belajar dan kemahiranmenyelesaikan masalah dengan keupayaan menyelesaikan masalah bagi tajukpecahan. Tesis Phd. tidak diterbitkan. Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Muir, T. (2008). Describing effective teachig of numeracy links between principles ofpractice and teachers actions. 11 th International Conference on MathematicsEducation (ICMG-ll) for study group2 New development and trends inmathematics education ofprimary level. Monterry, Mexico.Mulligan, J., Bobis, J., & Francis, C. (1999)Jnsights into early numeracy. The Count MeIn Too Project.Mullis, I. M. (2005). TIMSS 2007 Assessmentframework. Boston: Chestnut Hill.Munby, H. Russell, T. Martin, A.K. (2001). Teacher's knowledge and how it develops. InV.Richardson (ed), Handbook of research 011 teaciling.pp. 433-436. New York:MacMillan.Mundia, L. Malai Hayati Sheikh Hamid, MasitalrShahrill, Rohani Matzin, Salwa. (2008)Barriers to Mathematics Achievement in Brunei Secondary School Students:Insights into the Roles of Mathematics Anxiety, Self-Esteem, Proactive Coping,and Test Stress. Mahalle. Intemational Education Studies; Vol. 6, No. 11.Munirah Ghazali (2003). Development of a framework to assess primary students numbersense in Malaysia: Counting. SEMT. international Senior For Elem(111111)'Mathematics. Repbuplic Czes: Charles University.Munirah Ghazali, Siti Aishah Sheikh Abdullah, Zurida Ismail, Mohd Irwan Idris. (2005).Dominant Representation in the Understanding of Basic Integrals AmongPostSecondary Students. The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century ProjectUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shifts inMathematics Education, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Nov 25th - Dec 1st 2005, 97. 37MunirahGhazali, Rohana Alias, Noor Asrul AnuarAriffin and Ayminsyadore.Ayub.Munirah Ghazali, Siti Aishah, Sheikh Abdulah, Zuraidah Ismail & Mohd Irwan (2005).Dominant representation in the understanding of basic integrals among postsecondary students. The Mathematics Education into the 2151 country project:RefoID1, revolution and paradigm shifts in mathematics education:UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia.Munirah Ghazali. (2000). Kajian Kepekaan nombor murid tahun lima. Tesis Phd. Johor:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Munirah Ghazali. Shafia, A.K., Sharifah Norhidayah, Zuraida, I. & Fatimah, S. (2003).Development of a fremework to assess primary student's number sense inMalaysia. International Seminar For Elementary Mathematics. Pragua, CzeachRepublic: Charles University.Munn, P. (2005). Young children's rights to numeracy. International Journal of EarlyChildhood, 37( 3), 61-77.Murphy, C. (2004). How do children come to use a taught mental calculation strategy?Educational Studies in Mathematics. 56(1),3-18.N.Alsawaie, O. (2011). Number sense based strategies used by high achieving sixth gradestudents who experienced reform textbooks. International Journal of Science andMathematics Education, 34-45.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(2007). Principles and standards for schoolmathematics. Reston, VA: Author.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2012). Reflections of a second career mathteacher. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.National Council Teaching Mathematics (NCTM). (2009). Principles and standard forschool mathematics. USA: Reston, Va Author.Nesher, P. (1976). The three, determinants of difficulty in verbal aritmetics problems.Educational Studies In Matheatics, 7, 369-388.New South Wales Department of Education and Training (1999).Count me in tooprofessional development package. Ryde: NSW Department of Education andTraining.New South Wales Department of Education and Traning. (2003). Teaching about angles:stage 2. New South Wales: Ryde NSW.Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis ofsixth-grade pupils' errors on written mathematicaltasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31-43.Newsome, G. (1999). Comments on "educating teachers" paper setExpanding questionsand extending implications. Science Education, 83, 385-391.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radical dalam pendidikanmatematik. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1995). Children's fractional schemes. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan.Georgia: University of Georgia.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2003). Pendidikan matematik di Malaysia abad ke-21:harapan dancabaran. Kuala Lumpur: University Malaya.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2008). Isu-Isu Kritikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur:Universiti Malaya.Nik Suryani, N. (2002). Skim peratus bagi pelajar tingkatan satu. Tesis Phd. tidakditerbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Noraini Idris (1990). Skim penambahan nombor bulat bagi murid darjah dua dan tiga,tesisi yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Pendidikan universiti Malaya.Noraini Idris (1994). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik untuk sekolah rendah.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Noraini Idris (2009). Penyelesaian masalah daya penggerak dalam pengajaran danpembelajaran. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Matematik. Sungai Petani:Institut Pendidikan Gum Malaysia.Noraini Idris (2011). Kesedaran metakognisi dan pemahaman konsep dalam penyelesaianmasalah matematik. National Academic conference.Noraini Idris, (2004). Mathematics learning in English as a second language. DigesPendidik, 4(1),64-72.Noraini Idris,. (2000). Linguistik aspects of mathematical education: How precise doteachers need to be? In Cultural and Language Aspects of Science,Mathematicsand Technicalliducation. Universiti Brunai Darussalam.Noraini Idris. (1994). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik untuk sekolah rendah.Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Norlemi Amir (2005). Kefahaman operasi asas matematik. Tesis Sarjana. Kuala Lumpur:Universiti Malaya.NSW (New South Wales) Department of education & Training Curriculum Directorate.(2001). Count Me in Too: Profesional development package. Sydney.NSW Department of education & Training. (2001). Count Me in Too: Profesionaldevelopment package. Sydney.NSW Department of education & Training. (2008). Improving literacy and numeracy inNSW public school.Ng Siew Geok (1999). Kefahaman penambahan nombor perpuluhan bagi murid tahunempat. Tesis master. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.O'Donoghue, .J. (2002). Numeracy and Mathematics. Mathematics Social Bulletin, 48 ,47-55.O'Donoghue, J. (2006). Numeracy and further education beyond the millennium.International Journal ofmathematics education in science and technology. 26. (3),389-405.OECD (2011). PIAAC Technical Standards and Guidelines: December 2010. Paris: OECDPublishingOECD (2004) Programme for International Student Assessment. PISA Newsletter: Issue10.O'Leary. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: Saga Publication.Olive, J. & Steffe. (2002). The construction of an interative fractional scheme: the case ofJoe. Journal ofMathematical Behavior, 20,413-437.Olive, J. (2001). Children number sequences: An explanation of Steffe constructs and anextrapolation to rational numbers of arithrnatic. The Mathematics Educator, 11, 4-9.Oliver, A. (2008). Handing pupils misconception. Stellenbosch: Department of DidacticsUniversity of Stellenbosch.Ong Ta Hwa. (2004). Perhubungan antara kemahiran penyelesaian masalah matematikdengan pencapaian matematikpelajar tingkatan dua. Tesis sarjana. Kuala Lumpur:Universiti Malaya.Opper, S. (1977). Piaget's clinical method. Journal of Children's Mathematics Behavior1(4), 90-107.overcoming disadvantage. In T-Y Tso (Ed.), Proeedings of the36thConference of the International Group for the Psychology of MathematicsEducation 3,99-106.Othman Saidin (1999). Konsepsi pendaraban nombor bulat bagi murid Tahun Tiga. TesisPhd. Universiti Malaya.Paddian, M. C. (2009). Malaysian and Australian childrens representations andexplanation of numeracy problem. Educational Research for Policy and Practise,8, (3), 55-61.Parents as Teachers National Centre Inc, (2000).Research and Evaluation. [ElectronicVersion.] Retrieved November 2,2002.Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Ed. ke-3. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publishing.Penny Munn. (2005). Young children's rights to numeracy. International Journal ofEarlyChildhood. 37. (3), 61-77.Perry, B. & Howard, P. (2000).Evaluation of the impact of the Counting On program:Final Report. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.Perry, B. & Howard, P. (2001a).Counting On: An evaluation of the learning and teachingof mathematics in Year 7.Eighteenth Biennial Conference of the AustralianAssociation of Mathematics Teachers. Canberra, January.Perry, B. & Howard, P. (2001b).Collnting On: A systemic program for Year 7 studentswho have experienced difficulty with mathematics. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M.Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond (pp 410-417). Sydney: MathematicsEducation Research Group of Australasia.Perry, B. & Howard, P. (2001c).Arithmetic thinking strategies and low achieving juniorhigh school students in Australia. In R. Speiser, C. A. Maher, & C. N. Walter(Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of Psychology ofMathematics Education - North America Group (pp 273-280). Columbus, OR:ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Allan Leslie White 257 .Perry, B. & Howard, P. (2003).Evalllation of the impact of the Counting On program2002: Final Report. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.Perry, M. (2000). Explanations of mathematic sal concepts in Japanese, Chinese, and USAfirst and fifth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction. 18 , 181-207.Peshkin, A. (2003). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational research. 22 (2) 23-28. 'Peters, E., & Castel, A. (2009). Numerical representation math skills memory and , , , decision-making [Peer commentary on the paper "Numerical representation in theparietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?" by R. C. Kadosh & V. Walsh]. Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 32, 347-348.Peters, S., & Jenks, J. (2000).Occasional Paper No. 8.Young Children's Mathematics: Asupporting document for the "Making Things Count" resource. Wellington, NewZealand: Institute for Early Childhood.PIAAC Numeracy Expert Group (2009). PIAAC Numeracy: Conceptual Framework(OECD Education Working PaperNo. 35). Paris: OECD.Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology ofintelligence . London: Routledge Classics.Piaget, J. (1969). The Mechanisms ofperception (G.N Seagrim, Terjemahan). London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.Piaget. (1969). The mechanisms ofperception (MPiercy & D. E. Berlyne, Terjemahan).London: Routledge.Pineott, R. (2004). Are we responsible for our children's math difficulties? In B.A. Knight& W. Scott (Eds), Learning difficlllties: Multiple perspectives (pp.141-151).Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Educational Australia.Powell, A. F. (2003). An analytical model for stuying the development of leam?rs'mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of MathematicalBehavior 22(4) , 405-435.? P('J,:dk |