Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti punca berlakunya jenayah dalam kalanganpesalah muda dan meneroka aktiviti Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat (PKM) yang telahmereka ikuti dalam pembentukan tingkah laku. Kajian juga meneroka pandangan pesalahmuda terhadap aktiviti PKM dan melihat implikasi program...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6612 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6612 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
|
| spellingShingle |
Abd Rahman Mat Nordin Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| description |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti punca berlakunya jenayah dalam kalanganpesalah muda dan meneroka aktiviti Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat (PKM) yang telahmereka ikuti dalam pembentukan tingkah laku. Kajian juga meneroka pandangan pesalahmuda terhadap aktiviti PKM dan melihat implikasi program PKM yang telah mereka lalui.Pendekatan kualitatif dengan reka bentuk kajian kes digunakan untuk meneroka isu ini.Responden kajian melibatkan enam orang pesalah muda lelaki berumur 18 hingga 21 tahunyang disabitkan kesalahan jenayah oleh Mahkamah dan telah menjalani PKM di empatbuah Pejabat Kebajikan Masyarakat Daerah (PKMD) di Negeri Perak. Kaedahpengumpulan data melibatkan analisis dokumen, pemerhatian, dan temu bual secaraindividu. Triangulasi data dibuat melalui ketiga-tiga kaedah tersebut. Data dianalisisdengan menggunakan kaedah analisis dokumen, melibatkan fasa penelitian, pengkodan,pengecilan data serta pembinaan tema dan pengkategorian maklumat berdasarkanpendekatan Fraenkel, Wallen & Hyun, (2012: 20). Hasil kajian daripada analisis dokumenmendapati punca berlaku jenayah dalam kalangan pesalah muda adalah kecuaian dirisendiri, konflik keluarga, hilang kawalan diri, gagal mematuhi undang-undang, kurangkasih sayang ayah dan pengaruh rakan sebaya. Hasil kajian daripada pemerhatianmenunjukkan bahawa bentuk aktiviti khidmat masyarakat yang biasa dilaksanakan ialahmenyapu sampah, mencuci tandas, mengemop lantai di masjid dan PKMD. Dapatan kajiandaripada temu bual juga menunjukkan bahawa responden berpandangan membersihPKMD, sesi latihan menguruskan jenazah, sesi amali solat, slot seks bebas dan impakkepada generasi muda adalah penting. Kesimpulannya, PKM mampu menyumbangkepada bertaqwa kepada ALLAH, mengingati kematian, memulihkan dan menginsatkanpesalah muda. Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan PKM boleh digunakan sebagai satupendekatan sosialisasi semula yang menyumbang secara positif kepada pembentukantingkah laku. |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Abd Rahman Mat Nordin |
| author_facet |
Abd Rahman Mat Nordin |
| author_sort |
Abd Rahman Mat Nordin |
| title |
Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| title_short |
Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| title_full |
Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| title_fullStr |
Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| title_sort |
sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6612 |
| _version_ |
1747833281165918208 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:66122022-01-24 Sosialisasi semula pesalah muda melalui perintah khidmat masyarakat dalam pembentukan tingkah laku 2020 Abd Rahman Mat Nordin Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti punca berlakunya jenayah dalam kalanganpesalah muda dan meneroka aktiviti Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat (PKM) yang telahmereka ikuti dalam pembentukan tingkah laku. Kajian juga meneroka pandangan pesalahmuda terhadap aktiviti PKM dan melihat implikasi program PKM yang telah mereka lalui.Pendekatan kualitatif dengan reka bentuk kajian kes digunakan untuk meneroka isu ini.Responden kajian melibatkan enam orang pesalah muda lelaki berumur 18 hingga 21 tahunyang disabitkan kesalahan jenayah oleh Mahkamah dan telah menjalani PKM di empatbuah Pejabat Kebajikan Masyarakat Daerah (PKMD) di Negeri Perak. Kaedahpengumpulan data melibatkan analisis dokumen, pemerhatian, dan temu bual secaraindividu. Triangulasi data dibuat melalui ketiga-tiga kaedah tersebut. Data dianalisisdengan menggunakan kaedah analisis dokumen, melibatkan fasa penelitian, pengkodan,pengecilan data serta pembinaan tema dan pengkategorian maklumat berdasarkanpendekatan Fraenkel, Wallen & Hyun, (2012: 20). Hasil kajian daripada analisis dokumenmendapati punca berlaku jenayah dalam kalangan pesalah muda adalah kecuaian dirisendiri, konflik keluarga, hilang kawalan diri, gagal mematuhi undang-undang, kurangkasih sayang ayah dan pengaruh rakan sebaya. Hasil kajian daripada pemerhatianmenunjukkan bahawa bentuk aktiviti khidmat masyarakat yang biasa dilaksanakan ialahmenyapu sampah, mencuci tandas, mengemop lantai di masjid dan PKMD. Dapatan kajiandaripada temu bual juga menunjukkan bahawa responden berpandangan membersihPKMD, sesi latihan menguruskan jenazah, sesi amali solat, slot seks bebas dan impakkepada generasi muda adalah penting. Kesimpulannya, PKM mampu menyumbangkepada bertaqwa kepada ALLAH, mengingati kematian, memulihkan dan menginsatkanpesalah muda. Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan PKM boleh digunakan sebagai satupendekatan sosialisasi semula yang menyumbang secara positif kepada pembentukantingkah laku. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6612 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6612 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abd Rahim Abd Rashid. (2001). Nilai-nilai mumi dalam pendidikan: Menghadapi perubahan dan cabaran ala/ baru. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Abdul Jalil Borhan. (2013). Konsep siasah Syar 'riyyah dan pelaksanaannya dalam konteks Malaysia.Kertas Kerja dibentang pada Semir ar Kebangsaan Pelaksanan Siasah Syar'iyyah Dalam Konteks MasaKini: Isu dan Cabaran, anjuran Kolej Universiti Islam Melaka (KUIM) pada 21 Februari 2013.Abdul Razak Abd Manaf, Zarina Mat Saad, Zakiah Jamaluddin & Azlin Hilma Hillaluddin. (2013).Kajian keberkesanan program Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat dalam kalangan pesalah muda,Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia.Abu Rukhiyyah Majid. (2010). Al-wajiz ft ahkam al-hudud wa al-qisas wa al-takzir.Jordan: Dar Al-Nafaais.Adibah Bahori, Siti Zubaidah Ismail & Nik Khazarita Nik Md Khalib. (2017). Keperluan hukuman altematif terhadap penyelesaian krisis akhlak di Malaysia: Analisis pendekatanUndang-undang Syariah. Kertas Kerja Dibentangkan dalam Prosiding Persidangan AntarabangsaKelestarian Insan 2017 (INSAN 2017) di Ayer Keroh Melaka pada 1 - 2 November 2017.Ahmadi, A. (2007). Sosiologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.Ahmad Firdaus Mohd Noor. (2017). Pensyarah cemerlang pendidikan Islam di Polite/..-,,ik satu kajiankes. Tesis PhD. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Ahmad Ridwan Osman@ Hussin, Zaharah Hussin & Abdul Muhsin Sulaiman. (2018). Kesalzan dankebolehpercayaan konstruk di dalam kajian niat bersedekah. Kertas Kerja dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam, Anjura.'1 Universiti SultanZainal Abidin (UniSZA) pada 7 - 8 November 2ll I 8..A.inul Bashirah Ismail, Zuliza Mohd Kusrin & Mat Noor Mat Zain. (2012). Kesalahan PerbuatanTidak Sopan dan Hukumannya Menurut Islam. Jumal Hadhari 4(2).Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Alarid, L. F., Cromwell, P. F., & Del Carmen, R. V. (2007). Community-based corrections.United States of America: Cengage Learning.Amir Hasan Dawi. (2009). Sekolah dan masyarakat. Tanjong Malim: Quantums Books,59, 60.Amir Hasan Dawi. (2006). Penteorian sosio/ogi dan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim:Quantums Books, 282.Anderson, M. L. & Taylor, H. F. (2000). Sociology: Understanding a diverse society.Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Anderson, J. & Poole, M. (1998). Terjemahan Marzita Puteh & Sadiah Baharom, 2011.Penulisan tugasan dan tesis edisi ke-4. Perak: Penerbitan Universiti PendidikanSu?tan Idris & lnstitut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.Ang, B. L. (2003). Community rehabilitation of offenders in Singapore. Visiting experts'paper presented at 121 st International Traning Course, "Enhancement ofco1nmunity-based alternative to incarceration at all stages of the criminal ju5tice(y process" Annual Report for 2002 and Resource Material Series No. 61. September2003, Japan: UNAFEI.Arifah Rahimah Ismail & Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2015). Perintah Khidmat Masyarakatdalam perspektif dunia global: Kajian awalan bagi pelaksanaan Perintah KhidmatMl'syarakat di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia.Arifah Rahimah Ismail & Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2015). Perintah Khidmat MasyarakatTerhadap Pesa/ah Jenayah di Negra-negara Baral.Arifah Rahimah Ismail & Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2014). Perintah khidmat masyarakatsebagai hukuman alternatif di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia. Bangi: JabatanSyariah, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia JurnalUndang-undang (Disember).Arpah Abdul Razak. (2014). Laporan Sambutan Hari Tandas Sedunia PeringkatKebangsaan tahun 2014. Port Dickson: Dacaran Sri Kemang.Asmah Othman. {2013). The community service order (CSO) in England and Wales: Anexploration of the perceptions and experiences of the youthful offenders andsupervisors. Tesis PhD. United Kingdom: School of Humanities, Languages andSocial Sciences, University of Salford, Salford.Asmawati Desa, Fatimah Yusooff, Nurhayati Mohamad, Selmah Hasan & Noor AzimahAhmad Baharom, (2013). Modul pelaksanaan program pelatih perintah khidmatmasyarakat. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Sahagian Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat, JabatanKebajikan Masyarakat.Awang Armadajaya Awang Mahmud. Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Jabatan Peguam Negara.(2013). Hukuman altematif: Satu perbandingan di antara Mahkamah Sivil danSyariah. Konvensyen Perundangan Syariah. Anjuran Sahagian PendakwaanJabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam, Negeri Sembilan bertempat di Bangunan PejabatSetiausaha Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan, Seremban pada 6 Mac 2013.Awdah Abd Al-Qasir. (2009). Al-tasyrt al-jina 'i al-Islami. Kaherah: Dar Al-Haditb.Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. London: Wadsworth Cangage:Leaming.Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N. & Abe, S. (2000). Cultural and Situational Contingencies andThe Tra: Application to Fast Food Restaurant Consumption. Journal of ConsumerPsychology 9.Bailey, C. A. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. London: Sage Publications, 100,188.Basit, T. N. (2010). Conducting research in education contexts. London: ContinumInternational Publishing Group, 14.Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing social research. (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.Bear, B. F. (1991). When prison isn't punishment enough: The effective use of homeincarceration, community serve, curfew parole, and substance abuse testing.Criminal Justice 6.Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: PearsonEducation, 6-7.Bezruchka, S. (2000). Medical Tourism as Medical Harm to The Third World: Why? ForWhom? Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 11.Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: an introductionto theories and methods. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc., 55.Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An Introductionto theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen S. K., ( 1998). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introductionto Theory and Methods. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Bottoms, A. (2008). 'The Community Dimension of Community Penalties', The HowardJournal Volume 47 No. 2. May 2008 ISSN 0265-5527, 146-169. Oxford: BlackwellPublishing.Brennan, B. Y. T. P., & Mason, L. (1983). Community service: A developing concept.Federal Probation 47.Brownlee, I. (1998). Community punishment: A critical introduction. Harlow, AddisonWesley Longman.Browne, K. (2013). Sociology for AS AQA. United Kingdom: Polity Press.Brymau, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31.Burns, R. (2000). Research introduction to research methods. London: Sage PublicationsLtd.Cann, A. (2004). Rated Importance of Personal Qualities Across Four Relationships. TheJournal of Social Psychology, 2004, 144(3).Caputo, G. A. (2004). Intermediate sanctions in corrections. Texas: University of NorthTexas Press.Carrabine, E., (2004). Criminology: A sociological introduction. New York: Routledge.Carl, J. D. (2011). Think social problems. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 85,87.Carl, J. D. (2011). Sociology. Pearson: New Jersey, 49, 85.Carter, R. M., Cocks, J., & Glaser, D. (1987). Community service: A review of the basicissues. Federal Probation 51 t l ).Champion & Mays. (1991). Transferring juveniles to criminal courts: trends andimplications for criminal justice. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Chang, I., Liu, C., & Chen, K. (2014). The Push, Pull and Mooring Effects in VirtualMigration for Social Networking Sites. Information Systems Journal 24(4).Chua Y. P. (2012). Asas statistik penyelidikan. Edisi Kedua. Kuala Lumpur: GcGraw-Hill(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Chui, W. H. (2003). 'Experiences of Probation Supervision in Hong Kong: Listening tothe Young Adult Probationers' in Journal of Criminal Justice 31, 567-577.Clary, E. G.,S nyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J.,S tukas, A. A., &H augen. J. (1998).Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A FunctionalApproach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Claster, D.S. (1992). Bad guys and good guys: Moral polarization and crime. WestportCT: Greenwood Pr!ss.Cochrane, J., Melville, G. & Marsh, I. (2004). Criminal justice: An introduction tophilosophies, theories and practice. London: Routledge.Cook, J. R. (2001). Asphaltjustice: A critique of the criminal justice system in America.Westport CT: Praeger.Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order, New York: Charles Scribner'sSons, revised ed. 1922.Corbin, J., & Strauss, A (2008). Basic of qualitative research. (3nl ed.). California: SAGEPublication, Inc.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative & mixed methodsapproaches. (4th ed.). United Kingdom: SAGE, Publication Inc, 5, 197-200.Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among jiveapproaches. United Kingdom:S age Publications, 151,1 66,1 46-175,2 49-250,2 52.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educatinnal research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatingqualitative and qualitative research. (4th ed,). Upper Saddle River, Nj: Merrill.Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. Denzine, N. & Lincoln,Y. (ed). The SAGE Handbook on Qualitative Research (4tl: ed.) Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among jiveapproaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 73, 206-207, 208,209,243.Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design-qualitative, quantitative, and mixes methodsapproaches. (2nd ed). London: SAGE Publications.Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theoryinto Practice 39(3).Crews, G. & Gillespie, W. (2004). A brief history of corrections in America. dim. Livingin prison: A history of the correctional system with a insider's view. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.Cubukcu, Z. (2012). The effect of hidden curriculum on character education process ofprimary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 12 (2), 126-153,1529.Cullen, F. T. & Wright, J. P. (2002). Criminal Justi;e in The Lives of AmericanAdolescents: Choosing the Future, dim. The changing adolescent experience:societal trends and the transition to adulthood. disunting oleh Mortimer, J. T. danLa.rson, R., 94. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Cywinska, M. (20 I 0). Conflict situations among children. New Educational Review, Vol.22 Issue.Demirkasimoglu, N., Bagozzi, R.P., Wong, N. & Abe, S. (2012). Organizational rules inschools: Teacher' opinions about functions of rules, rule-following and breakingbehaviors in relation to their locus of control. Educational Studies. 38(2), 235-247.Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research project.(3rd ed.). England: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Qualitative research. London: SAGE PublicationsLtd.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (3rded.) Thousand Oaks, CAA: Sage Publications.De Vaus, D. A. (1993). Surveys in social research. (3rd ed.). London: UCL Press.Dignan, J. (2005). Understanding victims and restorative justice. England: OpenUniversity Press.Duff, M. (2003). Introduction: A global overview of the issues of and responses to teengangs. dim. Tee:n Gangs: A Global View, disunting oleh Duffy, M. P. & Gillig, S.E., 1-12. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.Dorsch, K. D., Riemer, H.A., Sluth, V., Paskevich, D. M. & Chelladurai, P. (2002). Whataffects a volunteer's commitment? Toronto: Canadian Centre for PhilanLJu-opy.Einolf, C. & Chamber, S.M. (2011). Who volunteers? Constructing a Hybrid Theory.Intemational Journal of Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 16.Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K. & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-groupcontextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74.Fatimah Yusoff. (2015). Gejala sosial remaja - Pandangan Dr. Fatimah Yusuf (CahayaOktober) . Tidak dicetak.Fariza Mohd Isa. (2018). Faktor yang mempengaruhi dan cara meningkatkan motivasida/am kalangan pelajar. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Seminar KebangsaanMajfa Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam pada 7 hingga 8 November 2018 iiiUniversiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu.Ferrante, J. (2006). Sociology a global perspective, Belmont: Thomson Higher Education,108, 134, 137.Finkelstein, M. A. (2011). Correlates of Individualism and Collectivism: Predicti.r.gVolunteer Activity. Social Behavior and Personality 39(5).Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Individualism / Collectivism: Implications for The VolunteerProce:;s. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(4).Flacks. (2006). Combining Retribution and Reconciliation: The Role of CommunityService Sentencing in Transitional Justice. Interdisciplinary Journal of HumanRights Law, 1(1).Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate researchin education. New York: McGraw Hill, 20, 111, 141, 427, 450-451, 458, 5 I 2.Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research. UnitedState of America: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Goodman, J. F. (2010). Niceness and The Limit of Rules. Journal of Moral Education.30(4).Hancock, B. et al. (2009). An Introduction to qualitative research. Diakses daripadahttp://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac uk/wp coten t/uplods/2018/0 l /5_Introduction-toqualitative-research-2009.pdf, padal 5 DisembP.r 2017.Haja Mydin Abdul Kuthoos, Noraida Endut, Azrnan Azwan Azrnawati, Intan HashimahMohd Hashim & Nor Hafizah Selamat (2016). Penerokaan awal terhadap jenayahseksual dalam kalangan remaja le/aid di malaysia: Satu kajian kes terhadapremaja di se!JL1ah pusat pemulihan. (3rd ed.). KANIT A Postgraduate InternationalConference on Gender Studies, 16-17 November 2016, Universiti Sains Malaysia,Pulau Pinang.Haris Abd. Wahab & Siti Hajar Abu Bakar. (2014). Dasar sosial dan pembinaan modalsosial di Malaysia. International Journal of Social Policy and Society, Vol, 10, 95.Harris, R. J. & Lo, T. W. (2011). Community Service: Its Use in Criminal Justice.International Journal of Offender Tl,eraphy & Comparative Criminology, 46, 4.Harris, M. K. (1980). Community Service by Offenders. Washington, D. C.: American Bar.Haron Din, Sulaiman Yasin, Hassan Salleh & Sidi Ghazalba. (2015). Manusia dan Islam.Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: PTS Millennia Sdn. Bhd.Hays, D. G. & Singh, A. A. (2012). Qualitative inquiry: In clinical and educationalsettings. New York: Guilford Press, 180,206,202,350.Henslin, J.M. (2007). Sociology a down to ?arth approach. (8th ed.). USA: Wd. Pearson,85.Herbert, L. P. (1968). The limits of criminal sanction. Chicago: Stanford University Press.Hirschi, T. ( 1969). Causes of delinquency. California: University of California Press.Horowitz, M. A. (2000). Kids Who Kill: A Critique of How the American Legal SystemDeals with Juveniles Who Commit Homicide. Law and Contemporary Problems63(3).Houle, B. J., Sagarin, B. J. & Kaplan, M. F. (2005). A Functional Approach toVolunteerism: Do Volunteer Motives Predict Task Preference? Basic and AppliedSocial Psychology 27(4).Hudson, B. (2003). Understanding Justice: An Introduction to Jdeas, Perspectives, andControversies in Modem Penal Theory. (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: Open UniversityPress.Hudson, J. & Galaway, B. (1990). Community Service: Toward Program Definition.Federal Probation, 54(2).Hurd, J. L. & Miller, D. K. (1981). Community Service: What, Why, and How. Fede!ationProbation, 45:39-41.Husin Jusoh. (2011 ). Faktor keruntuhan akhlak remaja Islam luar Bandar di Daerah KotaTinggi, Johor. Tesis PhD. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Hussein Ahmad. (2012). Mission of Public Education in Malaysia: The Challenge ofTransformation. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.Ismail Kamus & Mohd. Azrul Azlen Ab. Hamid. (2009). Jndahnya hidup bersyariat. KualaLumpur: Telaga Biru Sdn. Bhd.Junger-Tas, J. (1994). Alternatives to prison sentences: Experiences and developments.Amsterdam, New York: Kugler.Kim, Y. & Lee, W. N. (2014). Networking for Philanthropy: Increasing VolunteerBehavior Via Social Network Sites. Cyber Psychology, Behavior and SocialNetworking 17(3).Kornblum, W. (2012). Sociology in a changing world. (9th ed.). USA: Wadsworth, 46, 98.Kurz. (2000). The 8% solution preventing serious repeat juvenile crime. California: SagePublication.Lambert, M. (2012). Ji beginner's guide to doing your Education Research Project.Thousand Oak. Ca: Sage Publications, 138.Leibrich, J., Galaway, B., & Underhill, Y. (1986). Community Service Sentencing in NewZealand: A Survey of Users. Federal Probation 50(1).Lim C. S. & Chee K. M. (2010). Bab 8: Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan dalam pendidikan.Dalam Noraini Idris. (Eds). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan, 174-175. KualaLumpur: Mc Graw Hill. Malaysia.Lincoln, Y. S. & Denzin, N. K. (2011). Epilogue: Toward a refunctioned ethnography.The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Macionis, J. J. (2012). Sociology. USA: Person Education, 12, 36, 102, 103.Macionis, J. J. (2007). Sociology. (11th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest., & Marney, E.(2005). Qualitativeresearch method: A data collector's field guide. Research Triangle Par?, NorthCarolina: Family Health lntemat;onal.MacKay, J.G., & Rook, M. K. (I 976). The work order scheme: An evaluation ofTasmania's work order scheme. Australia: Research Council, Australian Instituteof Criminology, 377,380.Maizura Yasin & Nur Surayyah Madhabala Abdullah. (2018). Kerelevanan pendidikanmoral dalam memenuhi keperluan revolusi industri 4.0 yang beretika: sudutpandangan guru pelatih. Kertas Kerja ini Dibentangkan dalam SeminarKebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam pada 7 hingga 8 November2018 di Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak,Terengganu.Maloney, D. (2007). Restorative community service: Earning redemption, gaining skills,and proving worth. Rte/aiming Children and Youth 15(4).Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B.(2011 ). Designing qualitative research. (5th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic andpractical guide. London: The Falmer Press.McLaughlin, E., & Muncie, J. (2006). The SAGE dictionary of criminology. London:SAGE.Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research in practice: A guide to design andimplementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications, 139-140.Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion andanalysis. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass, 449.Merriam, S. B. (200 l ). Qualitative research design and case study applications ineducation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.Merriam, S. B. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study: Applications in education.New York: Jossey Bass Inc, 205,207.Mertens, D. M. (20 l 0). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integratingdiversity with quantitative, and mixed methods. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Michele Cotton. (2000). Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as AnArticulated Purpose Criminal Punishment. American Criminal law Reviev,1 37, No.4.Michael, J. (2003). Criminal Law in Hong Ko11g. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Minton, E. A. & Khale, L. R. (2014). Belief system, religion and behavioral economics.New York: Business Expert Press LLC.Moeller, T. G. (2001). Youth aggression and violence: A psychological approach. UnitedStates of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Mohamad Khairi Othman, Asmawati Suhid, Abdullah Mat Rashid & Samsilah Rosian.(2011 ). Hubungan faktor-faktor sosial dengan penghayatan nilai murni pelajar:satu dapatan awal. Kertas Kerja ini Dibentangkan dalam 16th InternationalConference on Education. Bertempat di Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute ofEducation, Universiti Brunei Darulsalam.Mohammad Ramzi Zakaria. (2015). Kecuaian dan Pengabaian Kanak-kanak oleh IbuBapa: Kedudukannya di Bawah Akta Kanak-kanak 2001 dan Prinsip Syariah, 19.Jumal Undang-undang Malaysia (2015), 37-49.Mohamad Faizal Mohammad & Mohd Zaki Ishak. (2014). Gejala Hubungan Seks DalamKalangan Pe/ajar: Satu Kajian Kes. Sabah: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Mohamad Nazrin Helmi Awang. (2018). Pesepsi pelajar terhadap faktor-faktor yangmempengaruhi keterlibatan pelajar dalam masalah sosial. Kertas KerjaDibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan UniversitiAwam pada 7 hingga 8 November 2018 di Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin(UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu.Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2012). Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat Bagi Kanak-kanak yangBerkonflik Dengan Undang-undang: Teori, Kerangka Perundangan dan Halatuju diMalaysia. Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 5-18.Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2012). Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat Bagi Pesalah Muda: Teoridi Malaysia. Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia.Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri & Noor Aziah Mohd Awai. (2009). Hukuman Terhadap Kanakkanakdi Malaysia: Pencegahan atau Pemulihan? Jumal Undang-r.:ndang, Vol. 13.Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2009). Pengurusan Proses Perobahan Terancang diBeberapa Buah Sekolah Bestari di Malaysia. Tesis PhD, Universiti Malaya.Mohd Salleh Lehar. ( 1 g98). Pengenalan ringkas sosiologi sekolah & pendidikan.Selangor: fhinker's Library Sdn. Bhd.Morris, N. & Newbw11, T. (1990). Between Prison and Probation: IntennediatePunishments in a Rational Sentencing Sysiem, New York / Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Muhammad Hafiz Lotti Amer & Mohd lzwan Mahmud. (2018). Keberkesananperkhidmatan kaunse/ing kelompok dalam menangani masalah sosial pelajarsekolah menengah. Kertas Kerja Dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Maj I isDekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam pada 7 hingga 8 November 2018 di UniversitiSultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak, Terengganu.Muhammad Muda. (2003). Apa itu kajian kes? Dibentangkan dalam Bengkel Penyelidikandan Penulisan Kes Siri I. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia pada 5-6 Mac.Mukherji, P. & Albon, D. (2010). Research methods in early childhood: An introductoryguide. London: SAGE Publications, Inc., 21.Norazla Abdul Wahab, Mohd Al-Adib Samuri, Tengku Noor Azira Tengku Zainudin &Anita Abdul Rahim (2015). Penentuan jam !.,edit bagi pelaksanaan perintahkhidmal masyarakat sebagai hukuman altematif terhadap pesalah muda yangberkonjlik dengan undang-undang di Malaysia. International Islamic UniversitiCollege Selangor, Universiti of Malaya dan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Norazla Abdul Wahab, Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri, Zuliza Mohd Kusrin & Anita AbdulRahim. (1014). Legal Issues in Implementing the Community Service Orders forChild Offenders in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10 (4).Norhidayah Hairul Azrnan & Norhayati Mohd Noor. (2018). Penglibatan ibu bapaterhadap kesejohteraan anak-anak dalam kalangan anggota polis: Satu kajian kesdi kem Pasukan Gerakan Am, Ulu Kinta. Kertas Kerja Dibentangkan dalamSeminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam pada 7 hingga 8November 2018 di Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus GongBadak, Terengganu.Nurbazla Ismail & Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2016). Prospek Perintah Khidmat Masyarakatdi Mahkamah Syariah. ISLAMIYY AT 38(1).Nurbazla Ismail & Mohd. Al-Adib Samuri. (2014). Matlamat Perintah KhidmatMasyarakat di Mahkamah Syariah Menurut Maqasih Syariah dan PandanganHakim Syarie. Universiti 5ains Islam Malaysia. Jumal 'Ulum lslamiyyah 14(Disember): 113-130.Nurbazla Ismail. (2014). Prospek Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat oleh Mahkamah Syariah.Jabatan Syariah, Fakulti Pengajaian Islam. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Nurzatil Ismah Azizan, Nazneen Ismail, Sahlawati Abu Bakar, Zanariah Dimoh & NurulHusna Mohd Jabar. (2016). Kaedah Menangani Masalah Sosial di PusatPerlindungan Maj/is Agama Islam Selangor (MAIS): Analisa Pendekatan AlQuran.Seminar Antarabanga Akidah, Dakwah dan Syariah 2016 (IR.SY AD 2016).Nurzatil Ismah Azizan, Nazneen Ismail, Sahlawati Abu Bakar, Zanariah Dimon & Asma'Wardah Surtahman. (2015). Permasalahan Sosial Dalam Kalangan Remaja DiSelangor: Satu Tinjauan. Seminar Antarabangsa Akidah, Dakwah dan Syariah(IRSY AD2015) padal 2-13 Oktober 2015 di Kuala Lumpur.O'Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: SAGE PublicationsLimited.Othman Lebar. (2015). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod.Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 15, 61, 71, 73.Pagnanelli, E. (2007). Children as adults: The Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Courts and1be Potential Impact of Roper vs Simmons. American Criminal Law Review 44( I).Pamment, N. & Ellis, T. (2010). A Retrograde Step: The Potential Impact of HighVisibility Uniforms Within Youth Justice Reparation The Howard Journal Vol.49, No. I. Februari 2010, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 28.Parsons, T. (1959). The Structure of Social Action. A Study in Social Theory with SpecialReference to a Group of Recent Eurorean Writers. (2nd ed.). Glencoe, IL: FreePress.Patton, M., (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Beverly Hils: SagePublication, 556.Pease, K. ( 1985). Community service orders. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review ofResearch, 6.Perrier, D. C. & Pink, F. S. ( 1985). Community Service: All Things to All People. FederalProbation 49(2).Puvenesvary, Radziah Abdul Rahim, Sivabala Naidu, R., Mastura Badziz, Noor FadhilahMat Nayan & Noor Hashima Abd Azizi. (2008). Qualitative research datacollection & data analysis techniques. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press, 83.Reddy, B. (1?91). Community Service Order: An Alternative Sentence. SingaporeAcademy of Law Journal 3(2).Remenyi, D., et al. (2003). Doing research in business and management: An introductionto process and methods. London: SAGE Publications.Roberts, M. (2006). Duffle Bag Medicine. Journal of The American Medical Association,295, 1491, 1493.Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. (2nd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: BlackwellPublications.R0kiah Ismail. (20 I 0). Pemerkasaan Pengguna Dadah Dalam Institusi Pemulihan diMalaysia: Ke Arah Menjamin Kesejahteraan Individu dan Masyarakat. MalaysianJournal of Society and Space 6, Jld. I, Bil. I, Mei.Rossman. G. B. & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Leaming in the field: An introduction to qualitativere,:;earch. London: Sage Publications, 137, 192-193.Rossman, G. B. & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitativeresearch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, 69.Ritche, J. & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social SocialScience Students and Researchers. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Sabitha Marican. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan sains sosial. Selangor: Prentice Hall,Pearson Malaysia.Salasiah Hanim Hamjah. (2012). Perkaitan amalan spiritual dengan pencapaian akademikpelajar. dim. Ajtlhe Vol. 4, No. 2, Julai.Schaeffer, T. (2012). Sociology: A brief introductions. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J. & Le Compte, M. D., (1999). Essential ethnographicmethod,;: Ethnographer 's toolkit. New York: Altamira Press.Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.Silverman, D. (2007). Interpreting qualitative data. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE PublicationsLtd.Sidhu. (2007). Amendments to The Criminal Procedure Code: Radical or PiecemealLegislation. Malayan Law Journal. 7.Siti Noor Fazariah, S., Razima Hanim, 0., Azahar, C. L., & Norhamidah, J. (2016). TheRelationship Between Parental Attachment Toward Delinquent Behavior AmongYoung Offenders. Southeast Asia Psychology Journal, Vol. 3, 2015-2016.Siti Uzairiah Mohd Tobi. (2017). Kajian kualitatif dan analisis temu bual. Kuala Lumpur:Aras Publisher, 2, 17, 42, 46, 48, 54.Siti Zubaidah Ismail. (2011). Hukuman Altematif dari PerspektifUndang-undang Syariah.Syariah Law Report 4.Skeen, A. S. ( 1988). Community Service Order. South Afica Criminal Journal (SACJ) 2.Spaans, E. C. ( 1998). Community Service in The Netherlands: Its Effect of Recidivism andNet-Widening. International Criminal Justice Review 8.Stortini, R. ( 1978). Community Service Orders. Criminal Law Quarterly 2 l .Stake, R. E. (2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Stenberg, C. W. & Colman, W. G. (1994). A Health and Education Policy IssuesHandbook. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theoryprocedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Sullivan, T. J. (2007). Sociology: Concepts and applications in a diverse world. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.Swanson, R. A. & Chermack, T. J. (2013). Theory building in applied disciplines. SanFrancisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Tak. P. J. (2001) Sentencing and punisillTient in the Netherlands. dalam Sentencing andsanctions in western countries, disunting oleh Tomry, M. dan Frase, R. S. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Teijlingen, E. R. V. & Hundley, V. (2001). The Importance of Pilot Studies, SocialResearch UPDATE. Department of Sociology, University of Survey.Thio, A. (2000). Sociology: A brief introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Thornberg, R. (2009). Tne moral comtruction of the good pupil embedded in schoolrules. Education, Citizenship and So?ial Justice 4(3), 55, 245-261.Tonry, M. (1997). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Trochim, W. M. (2016). The research methods lawwledge base. Diakses daripada http:lwww. socialresearchmethods.netlkb pada 2 Januari 2018.Tuan Pah Rokiah Syed Hussain & Lilah Yasin. (2016). Belia dan Pembudayaan SemangatSukarelawan di Malaysia: Suatu Pemerhatian Konseptual. GEOGRAFIA Onlinen.1Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12 Issue 9 ( 161-172) ISSN 2180-2491.Umbreit, M. S. ( 1981 ). Community Service Sentencing: Jail Alternative or AddedSanction? Federation Probation 45.Vass, A. A. & Menzies, K. (1989). Community Service Order as a Public and PrivateEnterprise: A Comparative Account of Practice England and Ontario, Canada.Britain Journal Criminal 29 (3).Van Kalrnthout, A. M., & Tak, J.P. (1992). Sanction systems in the member states of thecouncil of Europe: Deprivation of liberty, community se.--vice, and other substitutes.Bosten I Doordrecht NL: K.Juwer.Vockel, E. L. (I 983). Educational research. New York: Mc Millan Ptd. Ltd. Saini Raban.Vogel, T. et al (2014). Attitudes and attitude change. London: Psychology Press.Walgrave, L. & Guedens, H. (1996). The Restorative Proportionality of CommunityService for Juveniles. European Journal of Crime, C:iminal Law and CriminalJustice 4.Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational research a guide to the process. NewYork: McGraw Hill, 8.Wiersma, W. & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in educazion: An introduction. USA:Pearson Education, Inc.Xu, Y., & Ngai, N.P. (20! I). Moral Resources and Political Capital: Theorizing theRelationship Between Voluntary Service Organizations and the Development ofCivil Society in China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(2).Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (3ro ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, 5-6,13-14, 85-86, 89-92, 93.Zanariah Dimon, Nurzatil Ismah Azizan, Nazneen Ismail, Sahlawati Abu Bakar & NurulHusna Mohd Jabar. (2016). Pemulihan masalah sosial remaja menurut kerangkaSiasah Syariyyah: Tinjauan di Pusat Pemu/ihan Maj/is Agama Islam Selangor.Zainudin Sharif & Norazmah Mohamad Rosian. (2011 ). Faktor-faktor yangmempengaruhi remaja ter/ibat dalam masalah sosial di Sekolah Tunas Bakti,Sungai Lereh, Me/aka.., DAkta Dadah Berbahaya ( 1952).Akta Kanak-kanak (Akta 611) dan Peraturan-peraturan (2001).Al-Quran Surah An Nisa': 103Dasar-dasar Utama Kerajaan Malaysia (2010), 207.Kamus Dewan Edisi Ke-4. (2007). Selangor: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Kanun Tatacara Jenayah Akta A 1273. (Pindaan 2006).Kanun Tatacara Jenayah A274 (Pindaan, 2006).Kanun Keseksaan Akta 574 (Pindaan 2004).Ka.nun Keseksaan Akta 574 (Pindaan, 2006).Maksud Surah An-Nisa': Ayat 103.Parlimen Malaysia (2018). Senarai Rang Undang-undang, (dalam talian)., http://www.parlimen.gov.my/bills-dewan-rakyat.html?uweb=dr&arkib=yes,capaian 15 Januari 2018.Peraturan Tetap Operasi Perintah Khidmat Masyarakat. (Pindaan 2011 ). Bahagian PerintahKhidmat Masyarakat, Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat, Malaysia, Putrajaya.Perlembagaan Persekutuan Kerajaan Malaysia. (2009). Cet. ke-14. Kuala Lumpur: MDCPublishers Sdn. Bhd.Pindaan Perkara 6(3). Perlembagaan Perselcutuan Kerajaan Malaysia. (2009). Cet. Ke-14. Kuala Lumpur: MDC Publishers Sdn. Bhd.Pindaan Seksyen 2, Kanun Keseksaan (Aleta 574) (Pindaan 2004)Probation Division, A. 0. of the U.S.C. (1989). Implementing Community Cervice: TheReferral Process. Federal Probation 53.Riwayat Al-TermiziSeksyen 39(8) Akta Dadah Be:-bahaya ( 1952).Seksyen 293 (l)(e)(i) Akta Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan 2006).Seksyen 54 dan 55, Akta Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah (Akta 593) (Wilayah-wilayahPersekutuan) (Akta 539) ( 1997).Seksyen 2, Kanun Acara Jenayah (Akta 593) (Pindaan 1999),Seksyen 293, Kanun Acara Jenayah (Akta 593) (Pindaan 1999).Seksyen 293 Kamm Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan, 2006).Seksyen 293 (l)(e) Kanun Prosedur Jenayah (Akt.a 593)Seksyen 293 ( 1 )( e )(i), Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Akta 593) (Pindaan 1999)Sub Seksyen 293(1)(e)(iii), Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Akta 593) (Pindaan 2006).Sub Perenggan 293(1)(e)(i) Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Akta 593) (Pindaan 2006).Sub Perenggan 293(1)(e)(i) Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Akta A1274) (Pindaan 2006). |