The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college

The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of an augmented realitycourseware (ARC-3DM) towards the students 3D modelling performance at a communitycollege. This 3D Augmented Reality Courseware was developed using ADDIE model. The mainresearch design used in this study to determine the...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah
Format:	thesis
Language:	eng
Published:	2020
Subjects:
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6702
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6702
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	eng
topic
spellingShingle	Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
description	The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of an augmented realitycourseware (ARC-3DM) towards the students 3D modelling performance at a communitycollege. This 3D Augmented Reality Courseware was developed using ADDIE model. The mainresearch design used in this study to determine the effect of the courseware was a quasi-experimentwith pre- and post-tests. The instruments used in this study consisted of pre- and post-tests and aset questionnaire to measure the users perception on the usability of the courseware. The sampleof the study consisted of 54 students randomly assigned into a control group (n=27) and a treatmentgroup (n=27). Pre- and post-tests were conducted to both groups. System Usability Scale(SUS) questionnaire was administered to the treatment group in order to determine the perceivedusability of the ARC-3DM courseware after the treatment. Descriptive and inferential statisticssuch as percentage, mean, standard deviation, and ANCOVA were used to analyse the empirical data.The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the pre-test scores being the covariates, were conductedat the = 0.05 level of significance. The key result of ANCOVA [F(1, 51) = 133.91; p <0.05]showed that the post-test of the treatment group (M=70.69; SD=17.25) was significantly higher thanthe post-test of the control group (M=53.48; SD=16.55). This indicated that after thefour-week treatment, the experimental group has achieved higher performance in 3D modelling ascompared to the control group. In addition, based on the SUS questionnaire, themajority (85%) of the respondents agreed that the ARC-3DM was helpful and user- friendly inimproving their 3D modelling skills. In conclusion, the ARC-3DM courseware was found tobe effective and useful in improving the users 3D modelling competence. The implication of this research findings suggest that integrating augmented reality technology into thelearning environment could optimize the learning experience and can enhance the students 3Dmodelling skills. This courseware could be used as a novel learning tool to assiststudents in learning 3D modelling more effectively.Keywords: Augmented reality courseware, 3D modelling performance, Effectivenessand usability.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah
author_facet	Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah
author_sort	Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah
title	The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
title_short	The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
title_full	The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
title_fullStr	The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
title_full_unstemmed	The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
title_sort	effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate	2020
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6702
_version_	1747833293080887296
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67022022-02-10 The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college 2020 Siti Nur Shuhada Abu Samah The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of an augmented realitycourseware (ARC-3DM) towards the students 3D modelling performance at a communitycollege. This 3D Augmented Reality Courseware was developed using ADDIE model. The mainresearch design used in this study to determine the effect of the courseware was a quasi-experimentwith pre- and post-tests. The instruments used in this study consisted of pre- and post-tests and aset questionnaire to measure the users perception on the usability of the courseware. The sampleof the study consisted of 54 students randomly assigned into a control group (n=27) and a treatmentgroup (n=27). Pre- and post-tests were conducted to both groups. System Usability Scale(SUS) questionnaire was administered to the treatment group in order to determine the perceivedusability of the ARC-3DM courseware after the treatment. Descriptive and inferential statisticssuch as percentage, mean, standard deviation, and ANCOVA were used to analyse the empirical data.The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the pre-test scores being the covariates, were conductedat the = 0.05 level of significance. The key result of ANCOVA [F(1, 51) = 133.91; p <0.05]showed that the post-test of the treatment group (M=70.69; SD=17.25) was significantly higher thanthe post-test of the control group (M=53.48; SD=16.55). This indicated that after thefour-week treatment, the experimental group has achieved higher performance in 3D modelling ascompared to the control group. In addition, based on the SUS questionnaire, themajority (85%) of the respondents agreed that the ARC-3DM was helpful and user- friendly inimproving their 3D modelling skills. In conclusion, the ARC-3DM courseware was found tobe effective and useful in improving the users 3D modelling competence. The implication of this research findings suggest that integrating augmented reality technology into thelearning environment could optimize the learning experience and can enhance the students 3Dmodelling skills. This courseware could be used as a novel learning tool to assiststudents in learning 3D modelling more effectively.Keywords: Augmented reality courseware, 3D modelling performance, Effectivenessand usability. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6702 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6702 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Agaj, F. (2016). The impact of multimedia in teaching and learning. European JournalOf Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 72-77.Almarabeh, H., Amer, E., & Sulieman, A. (2015). The effectiveness of multimedia learningtools in education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science andSoftware Engineering. 5. 761.Aloraini, S. I. (2005). Distance learning. Alretha Press, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Alqahtani, A. S., Daghestani, L. F., & Ibrahim, L. F. (2017). Techniques used toImprove Spatial Visualization Skills of Students in Engineering Graphics Course: A Survey.International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 8 (3), 91-100.Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain Goodness of fit criteriabased on stochastic processes. The annals of mathematical statistics. 23(2), 193-212.Anthony, D. A. (2015). 3D Augmented Reality Science Book Developed Using Panda3d Sdk AndPype.Autodesk Knowledge Network (2017). Standard Primitives.https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/3ds-max/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2017/ENU/3DSMax/files/GUID-66152BDE-BA64-423F-8472-C1F0EB409E16-htm.htmlAvery, B., Thomas, B., Velikovsky, J., & Piekarski, W. (2005). Outdoor Augmented Reality Gaming onFive Dollars a Day.79-88.Azimi, K., Ahmadigol, J., & Rastegarpour, H. (2015). A Survey of the Effectiveness of InstructionalDesign ADDIE and Multimedia on Learning Key Skills of Futsal. Journal of Educational and ManagementStudies, 5(3), 180-186.Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recentadvances in augmented reality, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 21,no. 6, pp. 34-47.Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355385.Bal, E., & Bicen, H. (2016). Computer hardware course application throughaugmented reality and QR code ?ntegration: achievement levels and views of students. 12thInternational Conference on Application of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing, ICAFS. ProcediaComputer Science 102, 267272.Brooke, J. (1986). System Usability Scale (SUS)Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific Research 1: The Search For System. Springer-Verlag, New York.Cahen, I. S. & Linn, R. L. (1971). Regions of significant criterion difference inaptitude- treatment interaction research, American Educational Research Journal 8(1971), 521530.Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in naturalscience inquiry activities. J. Edu. Technol. Soc., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 352-365.Crow, L. D., & Crow, (1956). Human Development and Learning, American Book Company, NewYork.Curino, C. et al., (2011). Relational cloud: A database-as-a-service for the cloud, in Proc. 5thBiennial Conf. Innov. Data Syst. Res., Asilomar, CA, USA, Jan. 2011.De Alencar Carvalho, C. V., & Lemos, B. M. (2014). Possibilities of Augmented RealityUse in Mathematics Aiming at a Meaningful Learning. Creative Education, 2014, 5, 690-700.Delianidi, M., Papanikolaou, A., & Ilioudis, C. (2017). A Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) Blended Learning Application for Primary School Pupils.www.researchgate.net/publication/301621333.De Sousa, L., Richter, B., & Nel, C. (2017). The effect of multimedia use on theteaching and learning of social sciences at tertiary level: a case study.Yesterday and Today.Dimitrov, D. M. & Rumrill, Jr. P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs andmeasurement of change. Work 20 (2003) 159165.Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science. 11.Ernst, J. V., Lane, D., & Clark, A. C. (2015). Pictorial Visual Rotation Ability ofEngineering Design Graphics Students, Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 79(1),113.Essays, UK. (2018). Multimedia Applications for Educational Purposes. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/media/multimedia-applications- educstional-4151.php?vref=1Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahao, S. (2011). Usability Evaluation Methods For The Web: ASystematic Mapping Study. Information & Software Technology. 53. 789-817.Fujimoto, Y., Yamamoto, G., Taketomi, T., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2013). Relation betweendisplaying features of augmented reality and users memorization. Transactions of theVirtual Reality Society of Japan, 18(1), 8191.Furio, D., Juan, M. C., Segui, I., & Vivo, R. (2014). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Gelso, C. (2006). Applying theories to research: The interplay of theory and research in science.In F.T. Leong & J.T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.Retreived from http://www.sageereference.com/hdbk_psychrsch/Article_n32George, E., Liacouras, P., Rybicki, F. J., & Mitsouras, D. (2017). Measuring andEstablishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models. Radiographics.rsna.org.37 (5), 1424-1450.Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and Modelling: Routes to More Authentic Science Education.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115-130.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4Gridway digital (2014). 3D Animation Process and Workflow.http://www.slideshare.net/dmadzel/gridway-digital-the-3-d-animation-process--workflow.Gutirrez, L. M., Contero, M., & Alcaiz. M. (2015). Augmented reality to trainingspatial skills. Procedia Computer Science 77, 33-39.Heinen, J. (1985). A primer on psychological theory. The Journal of Psychology, 119, 413-421.Hsu, T. -C., Lee-Hsieh, J., Turton, M. A., & Cheng, S.-F. (2014). Using the ADDIE model to developonline continuing education courses on caring for nurses in Taiwan, Journal of ContinuingEducation in Nursing, 45(3), 124131.Hu, M., & Xu, S. (2012). Research of Multimedia Teaching on Principles of Management.IERI Procedia, 2, 666-670.Huang, K-T., Ball, C., Francis, J., Ratan, R., Boumis, J., & Fordham, J. (2018).Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examiningscience knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications.Cyberpsychol behave soc netw. 22(2), 105-110.Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of MarketingScience. Southwestern Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.Igwenagu, C. (2016). Fundamentals of research methodology and data collection.Itoh, Y., & Klinker, G. (2014). AInteraction-free calibration for optical see-throughhead-mounted displays based on 3D Eye localization.Jamali, S. S., Shiratuddin, M. F., Wong, K. W., & Oskam, C. L. (2015). UtilisingMobile-Augmented Reality for Learning Human Anatomy. 7th World Conference onEducational Sciences, (WCES-2015). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 197, 659668.Karen T. DAlonzo, (2004). The Johnson-Neyman Procedure as an Alternative to ANCOVA. WestJ Nurs Res. 2004 November ; 26(7): 804812.Karimi, H. A., & Hammad, A. (2004). Eds., Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing andServices. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2004.Katie, V. H., Gyory, P., Ngo, H., & Sumner, T. (2018). Enhancing 3D Modeling with Augmented Reality in an After-school Engineering Program (Work in Progress). 2018 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition.Khan, M. (2002).Teaching Methodology for 3D Animation.ICCE '02: Proceedings ofthe International Conference on Computers in Education.King, R. (2014). 3D animation for the raw beginner using maya. London: CRC.Kock, T. (2010). The future directions of mobile augmented reality applications, in Proc.PIXEL, 2010, pp. 1-10.Kramer, M., Olson, D., & Walker, J. D. (2018). Design and Assessment of Online, InteractiveTutorials That Teach Science Process Skills. CBE life sciences education, 17(2), ar19.Kysela, J. & Storkova, P. (2015). Using augmented reality as a medium for teaching history andtourism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 174, 926-931.Lewis, J., & Sauro, J. (2009). The factor structure of the system usability scale.Human centered design, 94-103.Liarokapis, F., Mourkoussis, N., White, M., Darcy, J., Sifniotis, M., Petridis, P., Basu, A., &Lister, P. (2004). Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. WorldTransactions on Engineering and Technology Education 2004, 3(1), 11-14.Majid, N. A. A., Mohammed, H., & Sulaiman, R. (2015). Students' perception of mobileaugmented reality applications in learning computer organization. Procedia-Social andBehavioral Sciences 176, 111116.Malik, S. & Agarwal, A. (2012). Use of Multimedia as a New EducationalTechnology Tool-A Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 468-471.10.7763/IJIET.2012.181.Matsutomo, S., Miyauchi, T., Noguchi, S., & Yamashita, H. (2012). Real-time visualizationsystem of magnetic field utilizing augmented reality technology for education. IEEE Transactions onMagnetics, 48(2), 531534.Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load inMultimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 4352.Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimediamessages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8,147154.Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1, 2-3.Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simpleuser interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of EducationalPsychology, 93, 390397.Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedialearning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 93, 187198Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence fordual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90,312320.Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: Anexperimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 484-490.Mazyrah, (2009). The Development and Usability of a Multimedia Black Cat Courseware using Storytelling Approach. Thesis Universiti Teknologi Petronas. (Not published).Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming InstructionalDesign. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.Meshram, S. (2015). Constructive Learning Theory: Exploring the Possibilities for thisInteractive Teaching Learning Methods in Physiotheraphy Education. J Nov Physiother 5:258.doi:10.4172/2165-7025.1000258.Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress,ERIC.Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult andcontinuing education.Miller, J. P. (2010). Whole child education, University of Toronto Press.Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum, University of Toronto press.Ministry of Education. (2012). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Ministry ofEducation Malaysia.Ministry of Higher Education. (2007). National Higher Education Action Plan 2007-2010: Triggering higher education transformation.Montgomery, D. C. (2012). Design and analysis of experiments 8th Edition. John Wiley &Sons.Moore, D. S. & McCabe, G. P. (1999). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 3rd ed. New York:W. H. Freeman, 1999.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helpslistening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156163.Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency incomputer-based multimedia learning: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177214.Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A Learner Centered Approach to MultimediaExplanations: Deriving Instructional Design Principles from Cognitive Theory".Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role ofmodality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358 368.Morrison, G. R. (2010). Designing Effective Instruction, 6th Edition. John Wiley & Sons.Muruganantham, G. (2015). Developing of E-content package by using ADDIE Model.International Journal of Applied Research 2015, 1(3), 52-54.New Straits Times (2016). Chasing the dream in animation. New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/2017/03/139977/chasing- dream-animationNg, G. W., and A. Shaziti. (2004). Augmented Reality in Education and Training. In, Proceedings ofNational Conference on E-Learning, 13-19. In, Center of Learning Technology and Multimdia.University of Science Malaysia: Penang, Malaysia.Nicholson, A. Y., & Ngai, J. Y. (1996). Managing the development and production of interactive multimedia courseware in education. Australasian Journal ofEducational Technology, 12(1).Nincarean, D., Bilal Ali, M., Abdul Halim, N., Hishamuddin Abdul Rahman, M.(2013). Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences 103. 657-664.NSW Environmental Trust (2011). What makes a good objective?Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphorAn emergentepistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535- 557.Patkar, V. (2018). Research Methodology: Logic, Methods and Cases. VIKALPA: The JournalFor Decision Makers. 43(3), 175-177.Penang Monthly (2015). Does malaysias animation industry have a future?. Penang Monthly.Retrieved from http://penangmonthly.com/article.aspx?pageid=4114&name=does_malaysias_animation_industry_have_a_future?Peres, S. C., Pham, T., & Phillips, R. (2013). Validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS): SUSin the wild. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting - 2013.57, 192-196.Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction, MedicalReference Services Quarterly, 32(3),244256.Remondino, F., & El-Hakim, S. (2006). Image?based 3D Modelling: A Review. The PhotogrammetricRecord. 21. 269 - 291. 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x.Renevier, P., & Nigay, L. (2001). Mobile collaborative augmented reality: The augmented stroll, in Proc. 8th IFIP Int. Conf. Eng. Human-Comput. Interaction (EHCI), London,U.K., 2001, pp. 299-316.Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A Primer In Theory Construction, BobbsMerrill Educational Publishing, IN.Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A Review of Research onAugmented Reality in Education: Advantages and Applications. International education studies, 8(13).Santos, M. E. C., Lbke, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Rodrigo, M. M. T., to, H.(2014b). Evaluating augmented reality for situated vocabulary learning. In Proceedings of APSCE 22nd International Conferenceon Computers in Education, pp. 701710.Sauro, J. (2011). Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS).Retrieved from https://measuringu.com/sus/Selay, A. & Buket, A. (2008). A Study on the development process of a multimedia learningenvironment according to the ADDIE model and students opinions of the multimedia learningenvironment. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 17,1-19.Sethi, (2005). Multimedia Education: Theory and Practice. Mittal Publications, 1, 1-8.Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing JustOne. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.Shearer, B. (2018). Multiple Intelligences in Teaching and Education: Lessons Learned from Neuroscience. Journal of Intelligence. 2018, 6, 38;doi:10.3390/jintelligence6030038Silva, R., Oliveira, J. C. & Giraldi, G. A. (2003). Introduction to augmented reality.Statistics Solutions. (2019). Normality. Retrieved fromhttp://www.statisticssolutions.com/academic-solutions/resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/normality/Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 3rd ed.,Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.Su, C., Xu, W., Feng, K. C. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system applicationin a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior 37, 3140.Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture andinstructional design. Educational Psychology Review. 10(3), 251-296.Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.Cognitive Science. 12(2), 257-285.Tarng, W. & Ou, K. L. (2012). A study of campus butterfly ecology learning system based onaugmented reality and mobile learning. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference onWireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology inEducation, 6266.Thangaraj, J. & Lakshmi Narayanan, R. (2018). Industry 1.0 To 4.0: The EvolutionOf Smart Factories.The Star Online (2014). The evolution of Malaysias animation industry. Retrieved fromhttps://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/entertainment/movies/news/2014/09/04/the-evolution-of-malaysias-animation-industry/Toby Mordkoff, J. (2016). Retrieved fromhttp://www2.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/mordkoff/GradStats/part%201/I.0 7%20normal.pdfTullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Proceedings of UPA 2004 Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota.Valentini, P. P., & Pezzuti, E. (2010). Interactive multibody simulation in Augmented Reality.Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Mechanics. 48, 733-750.Vaughan, T. (2011). Multimedia: Making It Works. 8th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 2011.Viirre, E., Pryor, H., Nagata, S., & Furness, T. A. (1998). The Virtual RetinalDisplay: A New Technology for Virtual Reality and Augmented Vision in Medicine. InProceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 252-257.Wang, T. (2010). Educational Benefits of Multimedia Skills Training. Techtrends. 54.47-57.Xia, S. A. (2011). Interactive Design Research of Multimedia Courseware inTeaching. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 271, pp. 1472-1477). TransTech Publications.

The effect of augmented reality courseware towards the students 3d modelling performance at a community college

Similar Items