Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer

Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradunterhadap pencapaian dan motivasi murid dalam tajuk algoritma bagi mata pelajaran Asas SainsKomputer (ASK). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen digunakan dalam kajian ini. Kajian dijalankan secara...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norraihan Rosman
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6714
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Norraihan Rosman
Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradunterhadap pencapaian dan motivasi murid dalam tajuk algoritma bagi mata pelajaran Asas SainsKomputer (ASK). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen digunakan dalam kajian ini. Kajian dijalankan secara persampelan bertujuan melibatkan 59 muridtingkatan satu yang mengambil mata pelajaran ASK di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuantan. Sampelterdiri daripada 29 murid untuk kumpulan rawatan dan 30 murid untuk kumpulan kawalan. Dua jenisinstrumen kajian digunakan iaitu soalan peperiksaan akhir tahun 2018 dan borang soalselidik motivasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan Statistical Package For The Social Science(SPSS) bagi mendapatkan data deskriptif iaitu nilai min, peratus dan sisihan piawaimanakala statistik inferens seperti ujian t dan korelasi Pearson digunakan untuk melihathubungan antara faktor yang dikaji. Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikanantara pencapaian ujian kumpulan rawatan (Min = 51.90, S.P = 11.99) berbanding pencapaian ujiankumpulan kawalan (Min = -19.17, S.P = 10.41), [t (28) =-23.31, <0.05]. Begitu juga dengan motivasi kumpulan rawatan (Min = 90.82, S.P = 6.27)menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (Min =63.4, S.P = 8.01), [t (57) = -14.44,
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Norraihan Rosman
author_facet Norraihan Rosman
author_sort Norraihan Rosman
title Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
title_short Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
title_full Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
title_fullStr Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
title_full_unstemmed Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
title_sort keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran asas sains komputer
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6714
_version_ 1747833295661432832
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67142022-02-14 Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer 2020 Norraihan Rosman Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradunterhadap pencapaian dan motivasi murid dalam tajuk algoritma bagi mata pelajaran Asas SainsKomputer (ASK). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen digunakan dalam kajian ini. Kajian dijalankan secara persampelan bertujuan melibatkan 59 muridtingkatan satu yang mengambil mata pelajaran ASK di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuantan. Sampelterdiri daripada 29 murid untuk kumpulan rawatan dan 30 murid untuk kumpulan kawalan. Dua jenisinstrumen kajian digunakan iaitu soalan peperiksaan akhir tahun 2018 dan borang soalselidik motivasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan Statistical Package For The Social Science(SPSS) bagi mendapatkan data deskriptif iaitu nilai min, peratus dan sisihan piawaimanakala statistik inferens seperti ujian t dan korelasi Pearson digunakan untuk melihathubungan antara faktor yang dikaji. Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikanantara pencapaian ujian kumpulan rawatan (Min = 51.90, S.P = 11.99) berbanding pencapaian ujiankumpulan kawalan (Min = -19.17, S.P = 10.41), [t (28) =-23.31, <0.05]. Begitu juga dengan motivasi kumpulan rawatan (Min = 90.82, S.P = 6.27)menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (Min =63.4, S.P = 8.01), [t (57) = -14.44, 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6714 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6714 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumenpenilaian kendiri pembelajaran geometri tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning andInstruction, 14(1), 211265.Abid Azhar, K., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers Perceptions.Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 5266.Ahn, M. (2017). Student Perception of Language Achievement and Learner Autonomy in a BlendedKorean Language Course: The Case Study of Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center.ProQuest LLC.Alhazbi, S. (2015). Active Blended Learning to Improve Students Motivation in ComputerProgramming Courses: A Case Study. Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle Eastand North Africa: Current Status, and Future Insights, 187204.Ali, A. &, & Zulkifli, Z. (2016). Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan (2016) 7: 5772. JurnalPemikir Pendidikan, 7, 7388.Ali, A. J., Abdullah, A. G. K., & Mohamed, I. (2019). Amalan Pengupayaan dan AutonomiGuru dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan Abad ke-21. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(1),4958.Arabie, C. P. (2016). Educational Technology Tools in Learning Management Systems Influence on Online Student Course Satisfaction in Higher Education A Dissertation Presented tothe Graduate Faculty of the University of Louisiana Lafayette In Partial Fulfillment of theRequire.Asbulah, L. H., Lubis, M. A., Aladdin, A., & Sahrim, M. (2018). (The level of holistic, intrinsicand extrinsic motivation towards arabic language vocabulary among graduate students inpublic universities). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 33, 7593.Asmawati Mohamad Alia, Norizal Abdul Karim@SAB, Anita Mohamed, N. I. (2018). Teaching Style andActive Learning Application in Dynamic Skills Subject for Realization 21 st Century Learning, 2,4755.Baaqeel, H. (2015). Central Limit Theorems and Statistical Inference for some Random Graph Models.University of Nottingham.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). DokumenStandard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Asas Sains Komputer Tingkatan 1.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (2016). 1.0 Konsep Asas Pemikiran Komputasional, 16.Baker, C. (2017). Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, anddescriptive. In Jones & Bartlett Learning (pp. 155183).Bati, T. B. (2015). Blended learning in large class introductory programming courses : an empiricalstudy in the context of an Ethiopian university.Blaschke, L. M. (2015). The Pedagogy Andragogy Heutagogy Continuum andTechnology-Supported. Springer Singapore.Blaschke, L. M., Hase, S., & Associates, A. (2019). Heutagogy and digital medianetworks: Setting students on the path to lifelong learning. Pacific Journal ofTechnology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1.Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Globalperspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Carnegie Mellon University. (2018). Center for Computational Thinking.Clark, M. H., Middleton, S. C., Nguyen, D., & Zwick, L. K. (2014). Mediatingrelationships between academic motivation, academic integration and academic performance. Learningand Individual Differences, 33, 3038.Culbertson, P. A. (2018). High School Blended Learning Courses : Teacher Beliefs , Perceptions OfExperiences , And Recommendations by Submitted to the University at Albany , StateUniversity of New York in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor ofPhilos.Fallis, A. . (2013). Essential Algorithms: A Practical Approach to ComputerAlgorithms. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53).Fronza, I., Ioini, N. E. L., & Corral, L. (2017). Engineering Methods : A Framework for MiddleSchools, 17(4), 128.Garcia-Pealvo, F. J. (2016). What Computational Thinking Is. Journal of Information TechnologyResearch, 9(3), 58.Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential inhigher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95105.Gerber, M., Grund, S., & Grote, G. (2008). Distributed collaboration activities in ablended learning scenario and the effects on learning performance. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 24(3), 232244.Goh, C. F., Leong, C. M., Kasmin, K., Hii, P. K., & Tan, O. K. (2017). Studentsexperiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E- Learning andKnowledge Society, 13(2), 117128.Hee Jee Mei & Siti Liyana Binti Mohamad Yusuff. (2011). Hubungan Antara TahapMotivasi Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Pendidikan Jarak Jauh UniversitiSains Malaysia, 120.Huang, C.-L., Yang, S. C., & Chen, A.-S. (2015). Motivations and Gratification in an Online Game:Relationships Among Players Self-Esteem, Self-Concept, and Interpersonal Relationships.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(2), 193203.Istvn Gerjk. (2017). I Mage Processing Algorithms In The Secondary, 10(3).Joy, R., & Ventayen, M. (2018). Usability Evaluation of Google Classroom: Basis for the Adaptationof GSuite E-Learning Platform Software Management View project Data Analysis View project,(December 2017).Juppri Bacotang. (2014). Pasti Tahap Kemahiran Literasi Awal Kanak-Kanak.International Language Conference, (February).Kaur, M. (2013). Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future. Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 93, 612617.Kharb, P., & Samanta, P. P. (2016). Blended learning approach for teaching and learninganatomy: Students and teachers perspective. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 65(1),4347.Knuth, D. E. (1981). Algorithms in Modern M a t h e m a t i c s and Computer Science. Knuth, D. E.(1997). The_Art_of_Computer_Programming - Vol 1.pdf.Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical ContentKnowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 1319.Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu,C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences inMathematics Education, 3(2), 154171.Kurniawati, R. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Mata PelajaranKeterampilan. Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesia.Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it Fit? Asystematic literary review, 157.Magelinskait?, ., Kepalait?, A., & Legkauskas, V. (2014). Relationship between SocialCompetence, Learning Motivation, and School Anxiety in Primary School. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences, 116, 29362940.Maizatul Hayati Mohamad Yatim & Ummu Husna Azizan.(2018). Pembelajaran Teradun : Trend,Isudan Amalan. Tanjung Malim, Perak:Penerbit UPSIMariam, M., Wibawanto, H., & Supraptono, E. (2018). Development of LearningMethod Blended Flipped Classroom of in Algorithm and Programming. Journalof Vocational and Career Education, 3(2), 168177.Mathews, K. M. (2016). Transformative Models in K-12 Education: The Impact of a Blended UniversalDesign for Learning Intervention. An Experimental Mixed Methods Study. ProQuest Dissertationsand Theses, (May), 137.McLaren, B. M., Deleeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). A politeness effect in learning withweb-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(12),7079.Meehan, T. (2016). A Quantitative Quasi-Experimental Study of an Online High School MathematicsRemediation Program.Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., & Fox, B. (2015). A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1063519).Mit, F., Senin, A., & Nasri, N. M. (2017). PERSEPSI GURU NOVIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN FROG VLEBERBANTUKAN FROG APPLIANCE DALAM PDPC, 288299.Mohd. Hamzah, M. I., & Attan, N. (2013). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Sains Dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat Berasaskan Komputer Dalam Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran.Jurnal Teknologi, 46(1), 4560.Mohd Azli, Y., Wong, K. T., Noraini, D., & Noh, M. (2016). Pembelajaran Teradun: Satu tinjauanliteratur terhadap faktor- faktor penerimaan guru melalui model- model penerimaan. Journalof Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 6785.Morrissey, B. (2017). Blended learning and motivation; An examination of StudentPerceptions.Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2016). Kolaborasi dalam Pendidikan Vokasional:Mewujudkan Pembelajaran Blended Learning melalui Teknologi Web 2.0. International Conferenceon ICT Education 2016 (ICICT @ Edu 2016), 1629.Muhamad Aizat, & Siti Huzaifah Mohammad. (2017). Hubungan antara Motivasi Kendiri denganPencapaian Matematik Pelajar Tingkatan 5 di Daerah Rompin. E- Proceedings National Innovation andInvention Competition Through Exhibition (ICompEx18).Nithia, K., Yusop, F., & Razak, R. (2015). Mobile learning for teaching and learning Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): A review of literature. Economics, Social Sciences and Information Management,(November), 173176.Noor Ashikin Ibrahim, & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Kesan Frog VLE secaraPembelajaran Koperatif terhadap pencapaian, KBAT dan minat pelajar bagi subjek Kimia.Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Transdisiplin (STeT 2017), 635 649.Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015 -2025. Education.Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2018). Quasi-Experimental and Single-Case ExperimentalDesigns. In Research Methods for Education (pp. 333370).Ramakrisnan, P., Yahya, Y. B., Hasrol, M. N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). BlendedLearning: A Suitable Framework For E-Learning In Higher Education. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 513526.Reynolds, R., & Leeder, C. (2017). Information Uses and Learning Outcomes During Guided Discoveryin a Blended E-Learning Game Design Program for Secondary Computer Science Education.Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017), 20762085.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: ClassicDefinitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 5467.Schmidt, J. (2007). Preparing Students for Success in Blended Learning Environments : FutureOriented Motivation & Self-Regulation. Educational Research, 1302.Schober, A., & Keller, L. (2012). Impact factors for learner motivation in blendedlearning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,7(SPEC. ISSUE 2), 3741.Selby, C. C. (2014). How Can the Teaching of Programming Be Used to Enhance Computational ThinkingSkills? UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON.Retrieved fromhttps://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366256/1/ soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_al4_mydesktop_Selby_cc_New_Amendments.pdfShaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). The Application of Google Classroomas a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and ComputerEngineering, 8(10), 811.Siti Khadijah Mohd Arrif.(2016).The Effects of Blended Learning In The Teaching of English ThroughShort Story Among Secondary School Students. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Siyamta, Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., & Ulfa, S. (2000). Teori Connectivism DalamPembelajaran Sebagai Pendukung Sistem Adaptive E-Learning and Big DataPersonalized Learning. InovasI PendIdIkan DI ERa BIg Data Dan AsPekPsIkoLogInYa ||, 417424.Solitro, U., Pasini, M., Gradi, D. De, & Brondino, M. (2017). Informatics in Schools:Focus on Learning Programming, 10696, 169179.Su, J. M., & Wang, S. J. (2017). A Web-Based learning activity integrated with scratch tool tosupport programming learning. Ubi-Media 2017 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference onUbi-Media Computing and Workshops with the 4th International Workshop on Advanced E-Learningand the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia and IoT: Networks, Systems and Applications,14.Tengku Sarina Aini, T. K., Fatimah Sahida, A., Yusmini, M. Y., & Madiha, B. (2017). PendekatanKonstruktivisme di Malaysia dan Brunei Darussalam: Satu Tinjauan Awal Terhadap Pengalaman Guru Pendidikan Islam. Journal of Islamic Educational Research, 2(1), 2335.Tosun, S. (2015). The Effects of Blended Learning on EFL Students VocabularyEnhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641647.Van Niekerk, J., & Webb, P. (2016). The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning materialin the teaching of programming logic. Computers and Education, 103, 1627.Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018).Students motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blendedlearning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 3340.White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66(5), 297333.Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,366(1881), 37173725.Xinogalos, S. (2016). Designing and deploying programming courses: Strategies, tools, difficultiesand pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 559 588.Yagci, M. (2016). Blended Learning Experience in a Programming Language Course and the Effect ofthe Thinking Styles of the Students on Success and Motivation. TOJET : The Turkish Online Journalof Educational Technology, 15(4), 3245.Zepcevski, J. (2012). Complexity & Verification: The History Of Programming As ProblemSolving. Social Sciences.Zhang, X., Huang, X., Wang, F., & Cao, X. (2018). Research on MOOC-based Blended Learning ofProgramming Language Course. DEStech Transactions on SocialScience, Education and Human Science, (ichae), 586591.Zhao, D., Chis, A., Muntean, G.-M., & Muntean, C. H. (2018). a Large-Scale PilotStudy on Game-Based Learning and Blended Learning Methodologies inUndergraduate Programming Courses. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, 1, 37163724.

Similar Items