Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar

Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar

Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (PBM)terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dalam topik Kadar Tindak Balas. Di samping itu,kajian juga bertujuan mengenalpasti sama ada wujud hubungan antara penggunaan kaedah PBM danpemikiran kritis serta motivasi pelajar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Izrul Azmi Md Nasir
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6755
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6755
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Izrul Azmi Md Nasir
Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
description Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (PBM)terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dalam topik Kadar Tindak Balas. Di samping itu,kajian juga bertujuan mengenalpasti sama ada wujud hubungan antara penggunaan kaedah PBM danpemikiran kritis serta motivasi pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasieksperimen telah digunakan. Pemilihan sampel kajian dijalankan secara persampelan rawak berkelompokmelibatkan 60 orang pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sains di sebuah Sekolah BerprestasiTinggi (SBT), Negeri Sembilan. Seramai 30 orang pelajar dari kumpulan eksperimen belajartopik Kadar Tindak Balas dengan kaedah PBM manakala 30 orang pelajar dari kumpulan kawalanmenggunakan kaedah konvensional selama tiga minggu. Pengumpulan data dijalankanmelalui ujian KBAT pra dan pasca, Ujian Pemikiran Kritis Watson Glaser dan soal selidik motivasi.Analisis ujian-t dan ANCOVA menunjukkan penggunaan kaedah PBM dalam proses PdP dapatmeningkatkan pencapaian pelajar dalam menjawab soalan KBAT. Analisis ujian-t bersandarmenunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dalam min pencapaian KBAT pelajar ujian pra danpasca bagi pelajar kumpulan eksperimen t= -22.212, p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Izrul Azmi Md Nasir
author_facet Izrul Azmi Md Nasir
author_sort Izrul Azmi Md Nasir
title Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
title_short Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
title_full Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
title_fullStr Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
title_full_unstemmed Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
title_sort kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6755
_version_ 1747833306249953280
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67552022-02-16 Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah dalam topik kadar tindak balas terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pemikiran kritis dan motivasi pelajar 2020 Izrul Azmi Md Nasir Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (PBM)terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dalam topik Kadar Tindak Balas. Di samping itu,kajian juga bertujuan mengenalpasti sama ada wujud hubungan antara penggunaan kaedah PBM danpemikiran kritis serta motivasi pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasieksperimen telah digunakan. Pemilihan sampel kajian dijalankan secara persampelan rawak berkelompokmelibatkan 60 orang pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sains di sebuah Sekolah BerprestasiTinggi (SBT), Negeri Sembilan. Seramai 30 orang pelajar dari kumpulan eksperimen belajartopik Kadar Tindak Balas dengan kaedah PBM manakala 30 orang pelajar dari kumpulan kawalanmenggunakan kaedah konvensional selama tiga minggu. Pengumpulan data dijalankanmelalui ujian KBAT pra dan pasca, Ujian Pemikiran Kritis Watson Glaser dan soal selidik motivasi.Analisis ujian-t dan ANCOVA menunjukkan penggunaan kaedah PBM dalam proses PdP dapatmeningkatkan pencapaian pelajar dalam menjawab soalan KBAT. Analisis ujian-t bersandarmenunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dalam min pencapaian KBAT pelajar ujian pra danpasca bagi pelajar kumpulan eksperimen t= -22.212, p 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6755 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6755 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Abd Rahim Abd Rashid. (2001). Kemahiran berfikir merentasi kurikulum. Shah AlamPenerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd.Abu Hassan Kassim (2011). Panduan penyelidikan dalam pendidikan sains, UniversitiPendidikan Sultan IdrisAkinoglu, O., & Tandogan, R. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in scienceeducation on students academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia J. Math.Sci. Technol. Edu. 3(1): 71-81Alczar MTM, Fitzgerald VL (2005). An experimental design to study theeffectiveness of pbl in higher education, in first year science students at auniversity in peru, south america. College Quarterly, 8 (2). Daripadahttp://www.senecac.on.ca/quarterly/2005-vol08Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: Arevision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.Athur (2001). The effects of the problem based alcohol early intervention education package onthe knowledge and attitudes of students of nursing. Journal Of Nursing Education40(2),63-72Aminah Ayob (2004) Laporan penyelidikan kesan penggunaan pbm terhadap kemahiran befikir kritis dan kreatif, kemahiran proses sains dan pencapaian sains. Pusat Pengajian IlmuPendidikan, Pulau Pinang.Azizi, Y., Nordin, Y., & Zurihanmi, Z.(2005). Psikologi kognitif. Skudai: Universiti TeknologiMalaysiaBarrows, H.S & Tamblyn, R.N.(1980). Problem based learning applied to medical education.Springfield:Southern Illinois University School Of MedicineBlanchard, M., S. Southerland, J. Osborne, V. Sampson, L. Annetta, E. Granger (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: a quantitative comparison of therelative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. ScienceEducation, 94 (4), 577-616.Chegwidden, W. 2006. A problem-based learning pathway for medical students: Improving theprocess through action research. Ann Acad Med 35: 642646.Christine Chin & Chia Li-Gek (2005a). Implementing problem based learning inscience.http://www.pbl.tp.edu.sg/pbl.20subject/articles/christinechinligekchia. pdfChin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: Using students questions to driveknowledge construction. Science Education, 88(5), 707 727Chiu M.H. (2001). Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry.Students At Local High School In Taiwan Chemical Education International, Vol.6(1), 1-8.Cohen, J. W. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral Sciences Ed. Second.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research andtheory. Academic Medicine. 75: 259-266.Creswell, J. W. (2010). Educational research - planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitativeand qualitative research (4th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.Cynthia Lim & Kathryn Goh (2006b) Becoming a PBL fasilatator. PBL foundation programme yangtidak diterbitkan Temasek PolytechnicDuch, B. J., Groh, S.E., & Allen, D.E.(2001). Why Problem-Based Learning? A case study ofinstitutional change in undergraduate education. The power of problem based learning(pp.3-11).Edwards S, & Hammer M (2004). Teacher education and problem-based learning: Exploring the issuesand identifying the benefits. Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne,Victoria, Australia.Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis andapplication (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Gertzman, A., & Kolodner, J. L. (1996). A case study of problem-based learning in a middle-schoolscience class: Lessons learned. Proceedings Second International Conference on the LearningSciences, Evanston/ChicagoGraaff, E., & Kolmos, A.(2003). Characteristics of problem based learning.International Journal Of Engineering Education.19(5), 657-662.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006).Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Hall, T.(2006). Problem based learning for technologies. Transnasional Symposium OnTechnical-Vocational Education And Training (TVET), 15-31.Halperin, D. (1994), Changing college classrooms, Jossey- Bass Publications, San Francisco, Ca.,pp. 11-12.Hamidah Maidinsah (2004). Kesan kaedah pengajaran metakognisi-inkuiri terhadap prestasi dalammatematik dan penaakulan sainstifik di kalangan pelajar diploma. Thesis Ph.D (Tidakditerbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia.Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem- based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1. 21-26Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning andinstruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13 (4), 394.Jamalludin Harun & Zaidatun Tasir (2003). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Percetakan Cergas.Jegede, S. A. (2007). students anxiety towards the learning of chemistry in someNigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2 (7), 193- 197, RetrievedJuly 4,2007 http://www.academicjournals.org/ERRKhairiree, K., & Kurusatian, P. (2009). Enhancing students' understanding statistics thinker plots:problem-base learning approach. http://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2009/papers_full/2812009_17324.pdfKlatt, J. & Taylor-Powell, E. (2005). Synthesis of literature relative to retrospective pretestdesign. Presentation to the 2005 Joint CES/AEA Conference. Toronto.KPM, (2001a). Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan, Matlamat dan Visi PusatPerkembangan Kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur, KPMKPM, (2001b). Pembelajaran akses kendiri. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. KualaLumpur, KPMKPM, (2002). Huraian sukatanm mata pelajaran Kimia tingkatan 4 & 5. Kuala Lumpur, KPMKPM, (2012b). Membudayakan Kemahiran Pemikiran Putrajaya: Bahagian PembangunanKurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.KPM (2012c). Laporan awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (2013 2015). Diperolehi pada 30 Mac 2015 daripada :http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/ppp/preleminary-Blueprint-BM.pdfLambros, A.(2004). Problem based learning in k-8 classrom: A teachers guide toimplementation. California:Corwin PressLehman, J., George, M., Buchanan, P., Rush, M. (2006). Preparing teachers to useproblem centered, inquiry-based science: Lessons from a four-year professionaldevelopment project. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem- based Learning, 1 (1) 76-99.Leman T. (2013). Problem based learning in acids and bases: Learning achievements and studentsbeliefs. Journal Of Baltic Science Education ISSN 1648-3898Linn, R., Gronlund, N.(2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8?? edition).New Jersey:Printice Hall.Lynda Wee (2004) Jump start authentic problem based learning Singapura Prentice HallMarzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J. & McTighe, J.(1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performanceassessment using the dimension of learning model. Alexandria, VA: ASCDMayer, Richard E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?American Psychologist, 59 (1), 14-19.Maysara, (2016). The effectiveness of problem based learning (pbl) model on studentslearning outcomes at class XI IPA 2 of senior high schools 5 south konawe on the subject ofcolloid system. Chemistry Education StudyProgramme Halu Oleo UniversityMergendoller, J., Maxwell, N., Bellisimo, Y. 2000. Comparing problem-based learningand traditional instruction in high school economics. Journal of Educational Research, 93,374-382.Mohd. Majid Konting (1994). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar (1998). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Mona,C.(2010). The effect of problem based learning in chemistry education on middle school students academic achievement and attitude. Lebanese: Lebanese AmericanUniversity.Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. McGraw HillEducation:MalaysiaNooraishah Bt Kasiran (2004). Penguasaan aspek kemahiran berfikir secara kritis dan kreatif di dalam mata pelajaran sains KBSM dikalangan pelajar tingkatan empatdaerah Kuala Langat. Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaN.S. Rajendran (2001). Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi: Kesediaan guru mengendalikanproses pengajaran dan pembelajaran. seminar projek KBKK: Poster Warisan Pendidikan-Wawasan anjuran Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, KPM, dari 1 hingga 2 OgosN.S. Rajendran (2000). Kesusasteraan sebagai wahana mengajar kemahiran berfikir. Seminar KebangsaanPenyelidikan dan Pembangunan 2000 anjuran Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan, dari 3hingga 4 Oktober.Osborne, J.F., & Dillon, J. (2008) Science education in europe: critical reflections a Report tothe nuffield foundation.Othman T (2013) Asas penulisan tesis penyelidikan & statistik Penerbit University Putra MalaysiaOnosko, J. J, & Newmann, F. M. (1994). Creating more thoughtful learningenvironment. In J. Mangieri & C.C. Blocks (Eds). Creating powerful thinking in teachersand students diverse perspectives.Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Pintrich, P. R., De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponent of classroom academic performance. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 82(1), 33-40.Philips, A. J.(1992). Memperkembangkan daya pemikiran pelajar melalui matapelajaran KBSM. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. 8, 1-15Poh Swee Hiang (1997). Pedagogi sains 2: Strategi pengajaran pembelajaran sains.Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman sdn. Bhd.Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Kemahiran Berfikir dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. KualaLumpur. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2002b). Pembelajaran akses kendiri. Kuala Lumpur. PusatPerkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Rafiei Mustapha (1998). Kajian tentang kemahiran berfikir secara kritis dan kreatif (KBKK) dalampengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa melayu sekolah menengah. kajian penyelidikan yangditerbitkan. Diperoleh Oktober 9, 2013 daripadahttp://www.mpbl.edu.my/inter/penyelidikan/1998/98 Rafiei.pdfRahayu, S., (1988). Pembelajaran kooperatif dalam pendidikan IPA, MIPA, Tahun 27, 2,Julai. pg.: 152-159.Ruggiero, V (1991). Thinking a guide to critical and creative thought. New York :Harper Collins PublisherSabariah, J.(2003). Kesan penggunaan kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan masalah terhadapkemahiran pemikiran kritis, proses sains dan pencapaian biologi. Tesis Doktor falsafah.Universiti Sains MalaysiaSahin, M. & Yrek, N. (2009). A comparison of problem based learning and traditionallecture students' expectations and course grades in an introductory physics classroom. ScientificResearch and Essays, 4(8), 753-762.Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C.H(2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. england:OpenUniversity Press Mcgraw Hill EducationSavery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1994). Problem based learning: An instructional model and itsconstructivist framework, Educational Technology, 35(5), 3138.Siti Fatimah, A., & Ab Halim T.(2010). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Penggunaan bahan Bantu MengajarBerasaskan Teknologi Multimedia dalam Pengajaran j-Qaf.Journal Of Islamic And Arabic Education. 2(2), 53-64Slavin, R. E., 1995. Cooperative learning, theory, research and practice, Secondedition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Som Nor & Mohd Dahlan (1998). Kemahiran berfikir secara kreatif dan kritis (KBKK).Petaling Jaya : Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.Syed Anwar Aly Dan Merza Abbas (2000) Penyerapan kemahiran saintifik dalam prosespengajian dan pembelajaran kimia di tahap menengah. Seminar Pendididkan Sains &Matematik, UITM Shah Alam 2-3 OktoberTan Oon-Seng (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the21?? Century. Singapore:Thomson Learning.UNESCO (2011). Transforming education: The power of ICT policies. Paris: UNESCOWang, H.A., Thompson, P., & Shuler, C. (1998a). Essential components of problem based learning forthe k-12 inquiry science instruction. Article Submitted To The California Science TeacherAssociation Journal.Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (1980). Watson glaser critical thinking appraisal. Form a.San Antonio: Psikological Corporation, Harcourt Brace And Co.Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning,BMJ, Volume 326Young, L., & Papinczak, T.(2012). Strategies for sustaining quality in PBLfacilitation for large student cohort. Advance in Health Science educationZaleha, I. , & Daliyanie, M.(2011). Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah (PBM) Dalam Matematik Di Peringkat Sekolah Menengah. Journal of Educational Management. 4, 1-17Zikri, A.(2009). Kesan Penggunaan Modul Pengajaran Berasaskan Masalah TerhadapPencapaian Dan Motivasi Pelajar Bagi Tajuk Pengaratan KimiaTingkatan Lima, Tanjung Malim: UPSI

Similar Items