Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah

Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadapkemahiran sukan tenis dalam kalangan murid sekolah rendah. Seramai 45 murid di tiga buah sekolahrendah yang berusia 10 tahun dan tidak mempunyai pengalaman dalam bermain tenis telah dipilihsecara rawak untuk menyert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khaliza Abdul Kadir
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6771
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6771
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Khaliza Abdul Kadir
Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
description Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadapkemahiran sukan tenis dalam kalangan murid sekolah rendah. Seramai 45 murid di tiga buah sekolahrendah yang berusia 10 tahun dan tidak mempunyai pengalaman dalam bermain tenis telah dipilihsecara rawak untuk menyertai kajian ini. Kesemua peserta yang terlibat menjalani latihan tempohpenyesuaian peralatan raket dan bola mini tenis selama seminggu semasa kelas PendidikanJasmani. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi-eksperimen ukuran berulang (RepeatedMeasures). Peserta kajian dikehendaki mengambil ujian kemahiran menggunakan tiga kombinasiraket dan bola dengan jisim berat berlainan (A=21 raket dan bola busa (foam); B=25 raket denganbola oren; C=27 raket dan bola hijau). Prestasi ujian kemahiran peserta telah diukur dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan ANOVA Ukuran Berulang. Dapatan ujian mendapati terdapatperbezaan yang signifikan dalam kemahiran pukulan hadapan [F (2, 43) = 5.067, p=.011], kemahiranjuggling pukulan hadapan [F (2, 43) = 10.065, p=.001], kemahiran juggling pukulan kilas [F (2, 43)= 13.896, p=.001], kemahiran pukulan pada sasaran [F (2, 43) = 5.116, p=.010] dan kemahiran pukulanpanjang rali [F (2, 43) = 4.662, p=.015] di antara tiga kombinasi raket dan bola tenis. Untukmelihat kombinasi yang berbeza secara signifikan, ujian pos-hoc Bonferroni telah digunakan dandidapati min skor kemahiran pukulan hadapan (M = 2.58, SP = 1.17), pukulan pada sasaran (M= 14.97; SP = 7.51) dan panjang rali (M = 5.85; SP = 5.13) adalah tinggi denganpenggunaan raket yang bersaiz kecil dan bola kurang mampatan (A dan B) berbanding dengan penggunaanraket dan bola bersaiz piawai (C). Sementara itu, hanya min skor kemahiran juggling pukulan hadapan(M = 26.49; SP = 13.99) dan juggling pukulan kilas (M = 34.15; SP = 14.53) adalah tinggi denganpenggunaan raket dan bola bersaiz piawai (C) berbanding raket kecil dan bola kurang mampatan (A dan B). Kesimpulannya, kombinasi saiz raket yang kecil dan bola kurang mampatandidapati memberi kesan yang signifikan terhadap kemahiran permainan mini tenis untuk murid sekolahrendah. Implikasi kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelatih tenis perlu menentukan kombinasi raket danbola yang sesuai untuk mencapai prestasi permainan mini tenis yang optimal.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Khaliza Abdul Kadir
author_facet Khaliza Abdul Kadir
author_sort Khaliza Abdul Kadir
title Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
title_short Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
title_full Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
title_fullStr Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
title_full_unstemmed Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah
title_sort kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid sekolah rendah
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6771
_version_ 1747833307584790528
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67712022-02-17 Kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadap kemahiran permainan tenis dalam kalangan murid Sekolah Rendah 2020 Khaliza Abdul Kadir Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan kombinasi peralatan mini tenis terhadapkemahiran sukan tenis dalam kalangan murid sekolah rendah. Seramai 45 murid di tiga buah sekolahrendah yang berusia 10 tahun dan tidak mempunyai pengalaman dalam bermain tenis telah dipilihsecara rawak untuk menyertai kajian ini. Kesemua peserta yang terlibat menjalani latihan tempohpenyesuaian peralatan raket dan bola mini tenis selama seminggu semasa kelas PendidikanJasmani. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kuasi-eksperimen ukuran berulang (RepeatedMeasures). Peserta kajian dikehendaki mengambil ujian kemahiran menggunakan tiga kombinasiraket dan bola dengan jisim berat berlainan (A=21 raket dan bola busa (foam); B=25 raket denganbola oren; C=27 raket dan bola hijau). Prestasi ujian kemahiran peserta telah diukur dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan ANOVA Ukuran Berulang. Dapatan ujian mendapati terdapatperbezaan yang signifikan dalam kemahiran pukulan hadapan [F (2, 43) = 5.067, p=.011], kemahiranjuggling pukulan hadapan [F (2, 43) = 10.065, p=.001], kemahiran juggling pukulan kilas [F (2, 43)= 13.896, p=.001], kemahiran pukulan pada sasaran [F (2, 43) = 5.116, p=.010] dan kemahiran pukulanpanjang rali [F (2, 43) = 4.662, p=.015] di antara tiga kombinasi raket dan bola tenis. Untukmelihat kombinasi yang berbeza secara signifikan, ujian pos-hoc Bonferroni telah digunakan dandidapati min skor kemahiran pukulan hadapan (M = 2.58, SP = 1.17), pukulan pada sasaran (M= 14.97; SP = 7.51) dan panjang rali (M = 5.85; SP = 5.13) adalah tinggi denganpenggunaan raket yang bersaiz kecil dan bola kurang mampatan (A dan B) berbanding dengan penggunaanraket dan bola bersaiz piawai (C). Sementara itu, hanya min skor kemahiran juggling pukulan hadapan(M = 26.49; SP = 13.99) dan juggling pukulan kilas (M = 34.15; SP = 14.53) adalah tinggi denganpenggunaan raket dan bola bersaiz piawai (C) berbanding raket kecil dan bola kurang mampatan (A dan B). Kesimpulannya, kombinasi saiz raket yang kecil dan bola kurang mampatandidapati memberi kesan yang signifikan terhadap kemahiran permainan mini tenis untuk murid sekolahrendah. Implikasi kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelatih tenis perlu menentukan kombinasi raket danbola yang sesuai untuk mencapai prestasi permainan mini tenis yang optimal. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6771 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6771 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan Anderson, K. (2007). United States Tennis Association Project 36/60. Coaching & Sport Science Review, 42, 17.Andrew, D. P., Chow, J. W., Knudson, D. V., & Tillman, M. D. (2003). Effect of ball size on player reaction and racket acceleration during the tennis volley. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 6(1), 102-112.Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yosof Boon & Abdul Rahim Hamdan, (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publication Sdn Bhd.Barrell, M. (2008). PTR kids tennis-teaching professionals manual. Hilton Head Island, SC: Professional Tennis Registry.Baumgartner, T. A., & Hensley, L. D. (2013). Conducting & reading research in kinesiology (5th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Baumgartner, T. A., & Gaunt, S. J. (2005). Construct related validity for the Baumgartner modified pull-up test. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(1), 51-60.Beak, S., Davids, K., & Bennett, S. (2000). One size fits all? Sensitivity to moment of inertia information from tennis rackets in children and adults. Tennis Science & Technology (pp. 109118). Oxford, England: BlackwBogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research: an introduction to theories and methods, (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.Bompa, T. O. (2000). Total training for young champions. Human Kinetics.Breed, R., & Spittle, M. (2011). Developing game sense through tactical learning: a resource for teachers and coaches. Cambridge University Press.Buszard, T., Reid, M., Masters, R. S., & Farrow, D. (2016a). Scaling tennis racquets during PE in primary school to enhance motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(4), 414-420.Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Reid, M., Masters, S. W. (2016b). Scaling the equipment and play area in childrens sport to improve motor skill acquisition: a systematic review. Sports Med. 46: 829-843.Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Reid, M., & Masters, R. S. (2014). Modifying equipment in early skill development: a tennis perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 218-225.Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Reid, M., & Masters, R. S. (2014a). Modifying equipment in early skill development: a tennis perspective. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 218- 225.Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Reid, M., & Masters, R. S. (2014b). Scaling sporting equipment for children promotes implicit processes during performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 247-255.Capel, S. (2000). Issues in physical education, Routledge Falmer: London.Capio, C. M., Poolton, J. M., Sit, C. H. P., Holmstrom, M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2013). Reducing Errors Benefits The Field?Based Learning of A Fundamental Movement Skill in Children. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23(2), 181-188.Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Arajo, D. (2007). The Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278.Chua, Y. P. (2013). Mastering research statistics . McGraw-Hill Education. Chua YP (2011) Kaedah dan statistic penyelidikan: kaedah penyelidikan. Mcgraw-HillEducation.Chua, P. Y. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.Coakes, S. J. (2007). Analysis without anguish: Version 12.0 for Windows. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Cohen, J (1988). Statistical power analysis for behaviour science (2nd. ed). Lawrence Eribaum AssociationCooke, K., & Davey, P. R. (2005). Tennis ball diameter: the effect on performance and the concurrent physiological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(1), 31- 39.Crespo, M., & Reid, M. (2009). Coaching beginner and intermediate tennis players: a manual of the ITF coaching programme. International Tennis Federation.Creswell, J. W. 2010. Educational research - planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, (3rd. ed). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W. 2005. Educational research - planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W. 2002. Educational research - planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice HallDavids, K. W., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: a Constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.Drowatzky, J. N. (1975). Motor learning: principles and practices, US: Burgess. Elliott, B. (1981). Tennis racquet selection: a factor in early skill development.Australian Journal of Sport Sciences, 1(1), 23-25.Farrow, D., & Reid, M. (2010). The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(7), 723-732.Fitzpatrick, A., Davids, K., & Stone, J. A. (2017). Effects of Lawn Tennis Association mini tennis as task constraints on childrens match-play characteristics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(22), 2204-2210.Fitzpatrick, A., Davids, K., & Stone, J. A. (2018). Effects of scaling task constraints on emergent behaviours in children's racquet sports performance. Human Movement Science, 58, 80-87.Gagen, L. M., Haywood, K. M., & Spaner, S. D. (2005). Predicting the scale of tennis rackets for optimal striking from body dimensions. Pediatric Exercise Science, 17(2), 190-200.Gary, S. (2009). Understanding Education Research: A guide to critical reading(2nd.ed). New York, NY: Routledge.Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2008). Education research. Competences. For Analysis and Application.Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application(5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall IncorporatedGill, D. L., Gross, J. B., & Huddleston, S. (1983). Participation motivation in youth sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 14, 114 -131.Groppel, J. L. (1977). Tennis racquet selection based upon selection anthropometric indicators. In American Alliance for Health, Physical Education & Recreation National Convention, Seattle, WA.Haake, S. J., Chadwick, S. G., Dignall, R. J., Goodwill, S., & Rose, P. (2000). Engineering tennisslowing the game down. Sports Engineering, 3(2), 131-143.Haikal Khazi (2018). Mirzan says company to takeover NTC must manage the centre professionally.http://www.nst.com.my.Accessed on 14 November 2018Hammond, J., & Smith, C. (2006). Low compression tennis balls and skill development.Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 5(4), 575.Headrick, J., Renshaw, I., Pinder, R. A., & Davids, K. (2012). Attunement to haptic information helps skilled select implements for striking a ball in cricket. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , 74(8), 1782-1791.Hua, A. K. (2016). Introduction to framework metodology in research study. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 1(4), 42-52.International Tennis Federation. (2011). Tennis 10s: The ITF guide to organizing 10 & under competition. London, England: Author.ITF. (2004). ITN on court assessment. International Tenis Federation, London.ITF. (2018). Official Rules of Tennis, 19-22. International Tenis Federation, London.Ivancevic T., Jovanovic B., Dukic M., Markovic S., Dukic N. (2008). Biomechanical analysis of shots and ball motion in tennis and the analogy with handball throw. Physical Education and Sports, Vol. 6, 51-66.Jeganathan, S. N. K. (2016). Instruksi model taktikal permainan. PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36.28-42.Kachel, K., Buszard, T., & Reid, M. (2015). The effect of ball compression on the match-play characteristics of elite junior tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(3), 320-326.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2010). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bahagian Sekolah.Bil. 16/1993.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2011. Buku panduan dasar 1 Murid 1 Sukan.Putrajaya. Malaysia.Khoo, K. K. (1991). Kecemerlangan Sukan. Majalah Akademik. (75) Julai. (1992). Sekitar Sukan Malaysia. Berita Minggu May, 31. (1994). Sekitar Sukan Negara. Sekolah Berfungsi Lahirkan Bakat Sukan. Berita Minggu, Mai, 31. (1995). Sekitar Sukan Negara. Berita Minggu Mac 19.Lam, E. T., & Zhang, J. J. (2002). The development and validation of a racquetball skills test battery for young adult beginners. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(2), 95-126.Larson, E. J., & Guggenheimer, J. D. (2013). The effects of scaling tennis equipment on the forehand groundstroke performance of children. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 12(2), 323.Liao, C. M., & Masters, R. S. (2001). Analogy Learning: A Means to Implicit Motor Learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(5), 307-319.LTA (2017). LTA Mini Tennis. Retrieved from http://www3.lta.org.uk/LTA-Mini- Tennis.LTAM (2018). LTAM Mini Tennis. Retrieved from http://www.ltam.my/-Mini TennisMan Daalen, M. (2012). Teaching Tennis Volume 2: The development of advanced players Bloomington: Xlibris.Marican, S. (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial: pendekatan pragmatik. Edu system.Martens, S., & De Vylder, M. (2007). The use of low compression balls in the development of high performance players. ITF Coaches Review, 42, 3-5.Masters, R. S. (1992). Knowledge, Knerves and Know?How: The Role of Explicit Versus Implicit Knowledge in the Breakdown of a Complex Motor Skill under Pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 343-358.Masters, R. S. W., Poolton, J. M., & Maxwell, J. P. (2008). Stable Implicit Motor Processes despite Aerobic Locomotor Fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 335-338.Masters, R. S., Poolton, J., Hodges N.J, Williams A.M., (2012). Advances in implicit motor learning. In skill acquisition in sport: Research, Theory and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 5975). Routledge.Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly. In Journal of ExperimentalPsychology.Mehta, R. D., & Pallis, J. M. (2001). The aerodynamics of a tennis ball. Sports Engineering, 4(4), 177-189.Mohd. Majid Konting. (2005). Methode in research education. 7th Edition. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.Mukherji, P., & Albon, D. (2014). Research methods in early childhood: An introductory guide. Sage.Newell, K. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control.Pallant, J. 2001. SPSS survival manual - a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 10). Buckingham Open University Press.Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2005). The Relationship between Initial Errorless Learning Conditions and Subsequent Performance. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 362-378.Renshaw, I. (2010). Building the foundations: skill acquisition in children. In Motor Learning in Practice (pp. 53-64). Routledge.Rive, J., & Williams, S. C. (2011). Tennis skills & drills. Human Kinetics.Sage, G. H. (1984). Motor learning and control: A Neurophychological Approach.Dubuque, Iowa, IA: WM.C.Brown.Sekaran, U. 1992. Research methods for bussiness: a skill-building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Singer, R. N. (1980). Motor learning and human performance: an application to motor skills and movement behaviors, New York, NY: McMillan.Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Thorndike, E.L. (1932). The fundamentals of learning, New York, NY: Teachers Press College.Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. (2001). Measuring research variables.Research Methods in Physical Activity, 181-200.Timmerman, E., De Water, J., Kachel, K., Reid, M., Farrow, D., & Savelsbergh, G. ( 2 0 1 5 ) . T h e e f f e c t o f e qu i p m e nt s c a l i n g o n ch i l d r e n s sp o r t performance: the case for tennis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(10), 1093-1100.Winter, G. (1980). A child is not a little adult: modified approaches to sport for Australian children.Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd Ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.