Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia

Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia

This research aimed to compare and contrast the principle of justice present inPeriyapuraanam text and Malaysian Judiciary System. This is a qualitative research, in whichhermeneutic approach was conducted towards the Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian judiciarydocuments. The texts analysis were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anbarasan Arunachulan
Format: thesis
Language:tam
Published: 2021
Subjects:
PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6925
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6925
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language tam
topic PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
spellingShingle PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
Anbarasan Arunachulan
Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
description This research aimed to compare and contrast the principle of justice present inPeriyapuraanam text and Malaysian Judiciary System. This is a qualitative research, in whichhermeneutic approach was conducted towards the Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian judiciarydocuments. The texts analysis were presented based on the themes and discussed concerning thesimilarities and differences between the Periyaapuranam text and the Malaysian judiciarysystem. The events in relation to the justice were observed through the history of 10Nayanmaar and one Sivanadiyar. The findings indicated that there were many similarities and afew differences of the justice principle between Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian principle ofjustice. The events were classified into 9 criminal cases and 2 civil cases. Componentssuch as judiciary knowledge, vast experience in judiciary, trials before sentencing, methods of summoning by the plaintiff, defence by the defendant, proven evidence,judgement and the compliance to the judgement seen in the Malaysian principle of justice are on parwith the ones found in Periyapuraanam text. In terms of differences, the identified ones includetechnological use, jail sentences and punishment for the cruelty towards animals anddeath sentence for certain crimes. These indicates that the principle of justice isgeneral and inherited. Overall, the findings proved that the principle of justice is stronglypracticed and adhered by the people regardless of the time periods. Ultimately, thisstudy implied that the literary texts such as Periyapuraanam can alsobe a source for peoples perusal to obey the countrys laws in everyday life.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Anbarasan Arunachulan
author_facet Anbarasan Arunachulan
author_sort Anbarasan Arunachulan
title Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
title_short Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
title_full Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
title_fullStr Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
title_sort perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6925
_version_ 1747833331794313216
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:69252022-04-06 Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia 2021 Anbarasan Arunachulan PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania This research aimed to compare and contrast the principle of justice present inPeriyapuraanam text and Malaysian Judiciary System. This is a qualitative research, in whichhermeneutic approach was conducted towards the Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian judiciarydocuments. The texts analysis were presented based on the themes and discussed concerning thesimilarities and differences between the Periyaapuranam text and the Malaysian judiciarysystem. The events in relation to the justice were observed through the history of 10Nayanmaar and one Sivanadiyar. The findings indicated that there were many similarities and afew differences of the justice principle between Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian principle ofjustice. The events were classified into 9 criminal cases and 2 civil cases. Componentssuch as judiciary knowledge, vast experience in judiciary, trials before sentencing, methods of summoning by the plaintiff, defence by the defendant, proven evidence,judgement and the compliance to the judgement seen in the Malaysian principle of justice are on parwith the ones found in Periyapuraanam text. In terms of differences, the identified ones includetechnological use, jail sentences and punishment for the cruelty towards animals anddeath sentence for certain crimes. These indicates that the principle of justice isgeneral and inherited. Overall, the findings proved that the principle of justice is stronglypracticed and adhered by the people regardless of the time periods. Ultimately, thisstudy implied that the literary texts such as Periyapuraanam can alsobe a source for peoples perusal to obey the countrys laws in everyday life. 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6925 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6925 text tam closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi Abdul Rahman Haji Ismail dan Azmi Ariffin. (2016). Sejarah Malaysia: WacanaKedaulatan Bangsa, Kenegaraan dan Kemerdekaan. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti SainsMalaysia.Animals Act (1953), (2006). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang- undang, MalaysiaArbitration Act (2005), (2011). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia BerhadAsian Law Students Association. The Abolishment of Jury System in Malaysia. Retrieved from https://alsamalaysia.com/the-abolishment-of-jury-system-in- malaysiaBurns, N. & Grove, S. K. (2003). Understanding nursing research. (3rd ed.).Philadelphia: Saunders Company.Chin Naam Koo. (1991). A comparative study of Islamic and Civil Law in Malaysia on Contract,Arbitration, Banking principles and documentation. (Unpublished masters thesis).International Islamic University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Civil Law Act 1956 (Act 67), (2006). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang,MalaysiaConstruction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan NasionalMalaysia BerhadContracts Act 1950 (Act 136), (2006). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang,MalaysiaCriminal Procedure Code, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang, MalaysiaDangerous Drug Act 1952, (2014). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya PenyemakUndang-undang, MalaysiaEvidence Act 1950 (Act 56), (2017). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang,Malaysia.Federal Constitution, (2010). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang- undang, Malaysia.Internal Security Act 1960, (2006). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya PenyemakUndang-undang, Malaysia.Kader Prahoo. (2014). Nursing Research: Principles, Processes and Issues. UK: Macmillan Education.Kanthasamy Nallusamy. (1993). A Study of The Saiva Siddhantha Principles in PeriyaPuraanam. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology, methods and techniques. (2?? ed.). India: New AgeInternational (P) Limited Publishers.Kumaran Ramayah. (2014). Devotional Norms Featured in Periyapuranam. Journal of Indian Culture andCivilization, 1, 111-117.Lucy Trevelyan. Right to a Jury Trial. Retrieved from https://www.inbrief.co.uk/legal-system/right-to-trial-by-juryMariette Peters. (2005). Evidence. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal.Marwah Saadi Salleh. (2014). The sellers obligation to deliver the goods under a contract of saleof goods. (Unpublished masters thesis). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.Mediation Act 2012, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia BerhadPenal Code (Act 574), (2015). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang- undang, MalaysiaRau & Kumar. (2006). General Principles of Malaysian Legal System. Malaysia:International Law Book Service.Rules of Court 2012, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-undang, Malaysia.Sarada Thallam. (2013). Cekkilars Periyapuranam and the Story of KaraikkalAmmai. Journal of South Asian Studies, 1, 83-90.Sharifah Suhana Ahmad. (2007). Malaysian Legal System. Kuala Lumpur: LexisNexis.Shunmugam, Chandra Mohan., & Sukumaran Ramankutty (2020). The Introduction and Development ofTrial by Jury in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: National University of SingaporeSuzanna Abdul Hadi, (2009). Jenayah internet: pengawalseliaan dan pentadbiran undang-undang diMalaysia (Unpublished masters thesis). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Vasantha Punniamoorthy. (2005). Law of evidence and criminal procedure: is there fair balancestruck between seeking justice and the rights of an accused person in Malaysia and the UnitedKingdom (Unpublished masters thesis). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.Vijayalakshmi Venugopal, A. (2001). Introduction to Law in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Sweet &Maxwell Asia.Wu Min Aun. (1994). The Malaysian Legal System. Kuala Lumpur: Longman Malaysia.Zulazhar Tahir, (2011). Sistem keadilan jenayah di Malaysia: suatu analisis dari perspektif hak-hak tertuduh (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UniversityMalaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Similar Items