Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor

Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor

Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis pelaksanaan Program Dwibahasa (DLP) Matematikbagi murid tingkatan dua dan membandingkan pencapaian matematik murid yang mengikutiprogram DLP dan murid yang tidak mengikuti program DLP. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nur Izyan Mohd Noor
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6954
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6954
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Nur Izyan Mohd Noor
Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
description Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis pelaksanaan Program Dwibahasa (DLP) Matematikbagi murid tingkatan dua dan membandingkan pencapaian matematik murid yang mengikutiprogram DLP dan murid yang tidak mengikuti program DLP. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Seramai 155 orang muridtingkatan dua sekolah menengah sains di Selangor dipilih sebagai responden dengan menggunakanteknik pensampelan rawak mudah manakala empat orang guru dan 20 orang murid sebagai peserta kajianuntuk temu bual dipilih secara pensampelan bertujuan . Instrumen kajian yang digunakan adalahborang soal selidik menggunakan skala Likert 5-poin dan soalan terbuka serta soalan temu bual. Datadianalisis menggunakan ujian-t satu sampel, ujian-t dua sampel tak bersandar dan analisis dokumentemu bual. Hasil soal selidik menunjukkan murid memberi persepsi yang positif terhadappelaksanaan DLP [(154) = 57.94, ? 0.05]. Kesimpulan daripada dapatan kajian menunjukkan murid menerima baik pelaksanaanprogram DLP, namun masih perlu penambahbaikan dalam memastikan kejayaan pelaksanaannya. Implikasinya, program DLP boleh diteruskan dengan menambahbaik aspek pelaksanaannyaagar program ini lebih berkesan sekaligusmeningkatkan pencapaian matematik.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nur Izyan Mohd Noor
author_facet Nur Izyan Mohd Noor
author_sort Nur Izyan Mohd Noor
title Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
title_short Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
title_full Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
title_fullStr Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
title_full_unstemmed Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor
title_sort analisis program dwibahasa (dlp) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek matematik murid tingkatan dua di negeri selangor
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6954
_version_ 1747833336720523264
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:69542022-04-11 Analisis Program Dwibahasa (DLP) dan perbandingan pencapaian dalam subjek Matematik murid tingkatan dua di Negeri Selangor 2020 Nur Izyan Mohd Noor Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis pelaksanaan Program Dwibahasa (DLP) Matematikbagi murid tingkatan dua dan membandingkan pencapaian matematik murid yang mengikutiprogram DLP dan murid yang tidak mengikuti program DLP. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Seramai 155 orang muridtingkatan dua sekolah menengah sains di Selangor dipilih sebagai responden dengan menggunakanteknik pensampelan rawak mudah manakala empat orang guru dan 20 orang murid sebagai peserta kajianuntuk temu bual dipilih secara pensampelan bertujuan . Instrumen kajian yang digunakan adalahborang soal selidik menggunakan skala Likert 5-poin dan soalan terbuka serta soalan temu bual. Datadianalisis menggunakan ujian-t satu sampel, ujian-t dua sampel tak bersandar dan analisis dokumentemu bual. Hasil soal selidik menunjukkan murid memberi persepsi yang positif terhadappelaksanaan DLP [(154) = 57.94, ? 0.05]. Kesimpulan daripada dapatan kajian menunjukkan murid menerima baik pelaksanaanprogram DLP, namun masih perlu penambahbaikan dalam memastikan kejayaan pelaksanaannya. Implikasinya, program DLP boleh diteruskan dengan menambahbaik aspek pelaksanaannyaagar program ini lebih berkesan sekaligusmeningkatkan pencapaian matematik. 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6954 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6954 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Ali, M. & Ismail, Z. (2006). Comprehension level of non-technical terms in Science: Are we readyfor Science in English. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, (21): 73 83.Arsad, M. S. M. (2015, October 31). Bertentangan dasar MBMMBI. Berita Harian. Ashairi Suliman,Mohamed Yusoff Mohd Nor & Melor Md Yunus. (2017). Dual-Language Programme in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Are You Ready? Paper presented at Seminar Serantau. Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, September.Atan, A. (2016). DLP: Kerajaan tidak ambil iktibar kegagalan PPSMI. Diperolehi darihttp://www.malaysiadateline.com/index.php/berita- list/15berita/1905-Aziz, R. M. R. A., & Nair, R. (2015). Globalisation and the evolution of Englishlanguage education in Malaysian secondary schools. In Bernard Spolsky and Kiwan Sung (Eds),Secondary School English in Asia: From policy to practice. New York: Routledge.Ball, J. (2014). Children learn better in their mother tongue. Diperolehi darihttp://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/children-learn-better-their- mother-Barbara G. Tabachnick & Linda S. Fidell (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th EditionCalifornia State University, NorthridgeCohen, J. (1960). A Coeffisient For Agreement For Nominal Scales. Educational dan PsychologicalMeasurement, 37-46.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th Edition). London:Routledge Falmer.Compton, B.R., Galaway, B., & Cournoyer, B. R. (2005). Social Work Processes (7th Edition).California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Chan, S. H., & Abdullah, A. N. (2015). Bilingualism in Malaysia. Language education policy andlocal needs. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Hum, 23(S), 55-70.Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan buku 1.Selangor: McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).Chua Yan Piaw. (2014a). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan-Asas StatistikPenyelidikan (Buku 2), Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education.Chua Yan Piaw. (2014b). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan- Analisis Data Skala Likert disiKetiga. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education.Chua Yan Piaw. (2014c). Kaedah dan Statistik penyelidikan-Ujian Univariat dan Multivariat(Buku 4), Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education.Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitativeand qualitative research (Edisi ke-3). New Jersey.Pearson Merril-Prentice Hall.Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixedmethods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Cresswell J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed MethodsApproaches (3rd Edition): SAGE, UK.Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed MethodsResearch (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response Sets and Test Validity. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 672-683.Darulsalam, Ghazali & Hussin, Sufean. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan :Amalan dan Analisis Kajian. (2016), Kuala Lumpur : University of Malaya Press.David, M.K. & Govindasamy, S. (2005). Negotiating a national language policy: Local need for Affirmative action versus commitment towards globalization. In A.S. Canagarajah (Ed.),reclaiming the local in language policy and practice.Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Davis, K., Guest Editor. (2014). Introduction. Engaged Language Policy and Practices.In Language Policy. Journal thematic issue.Elizabeth John & Aniza Damis. (2008). Teaching of Maths and Science in English: Study RevealsPolicys Flaws. Diperolehi darihttp://www.prihatin.net/keratan-akhbar-terpilih/38-teaching-of-maths-and- science-in-english-study-reveals-policys-flaws.htmlEnglish Language Standards & Quality Council. (2015). English language educationreform in Malaysia: The Roadmap 2015-2025.Faizah Mohamad Nor, Marzilah A. Aziz & Kamaruzaman Jusoff. (2011). Should English forTeaching Mathematics and Science (ETeMS) in Malaysia Be Abolished? World Applied SciencesJournal. Special Issue on Creating a Knowledge Based Society. 36-40.Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research ineducation (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Gapena. Sakitnya di kepala, kenapa diberi ubat cirit?' Diperolehi darihttp://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/isu- program- dwi-bahasa-sakitnya-di-kepala-kenapa-diberi-ubat-cirit-gapena-882045.GEMA. (2017). Journal of Language Studies Volume 17(4), November 2017. Diambil Februari, 14, 2018,dari http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1704-09Genesee, F. & Fortune, T. W. (2014). Bilingual education and at-risk students. Journal of Immersionand Content Based Language Education, 2(2), 196209.Hair. J.F. JR, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, WC (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading, (7th Edition.) New Jersey; Prentice Hall, Inc, Washington DC.Hamid, A. J. (2011, November 6). Overhaul nations education policy. The Star,Diperolehi dari http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/2011- November/013311.htmlHamidah Yusof, Jamal Yunus, & Khalid Musa. (2015). Kaedah Penyelidikan PengurusanPendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L. A., Gunel, M. & Akkus, R. (2016). Aligning Teaching to Learning: A3-Year Study Examining the Embedding of Language and Argumentation into Elementary ScienceClassrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 14(5), 847-863.Hannah, R., 2013. The effect of classroom environment on students learning. BA Thesis,Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MichiganHaron, I., Gapor, L., Masran, M., N., Ibrahim, A., H. & Nor, M. M. (2008). Kesan dasarPengajaran Matematik dan Sains dalam Bahasa Inggeris. Diperolehi dari http://www.scribd.com/doc/11492280/PPSMI-Kajian-UPSI-April- 2008- Penuh.Ho, chiu-chung. 2010. An evaluation of the effect of changing the medium ofinstruction in a HongKong.Holmes, R., Dahan, H. M. & Ashari, H. (2008). A Guide to Research in the Social Sciences.Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall.Hussain, K. S. K. & Hamid, A. H. (2009, July 19). PPSMI satu kesilapan. UtusanMalaysia, Diperolehi dari http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2009&dt=0719&sec=Rencana&pg=re_02.htmIdris, N., Cheong, L., S. Nor, N., M., Razak, A., Z., A. & Saad, R. M. (2007). The professionalpreparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning ofMathematics and Science in English. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and TechnologyEducation, 3(2), 101-110.Ilangko, Noorulafiza & Hamahida (Mei 2014). Penggunaan Bahasa Ibunda dalam PengajaranBahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Murid Peribumi di Sekolah Pedalaman Sarawak. Jurnal PendidikanBahasa Melayu JBPM. 4(1), 65-74.Diperolehi darihttp://www.ukm.my/jbpm/pdf/65-74%20Ilangko%20et%20al.USM.pdfIsa, Z., Zakaria, A. M., Azlan, M. I., Noorani, M. S. M., Majid, N., Ismail, H., Jaaman,S. H., et al (2011). Students Perceptions of the Implementation of Teaching and Learning of Science and Mathematics in English. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18(2011),361-366.Isahak Haron, Abdul Latif Gapor, Md Nasir Masran, Abdul Halim Ibrahim & Mariam MohamedNor. (2008). Kesan Dasar Pengajaran Matematik dan Sains dalam Bahasa Inggeris di SekolahRendah. Diperolehi dari http://profabdullah1.wordpress.com/2009/02/08/11a-kesan-ppsmi-di-sekolah-rendah.Jalleh, J. (2012, September 26). Majority of teachers not proficient in English.Diperolehi dari http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2012/09/26/majority-of-teachers-not-proficient-in-english/Jamaluddin, K. (2008). Science and Maths in English-Alternative Views. Diperolehi darihttp://educationmalaysia.blogspot.com/2008/09/science-and- math- in- english-alternative.htmlJantan, J. (2008). Persidangan meja bulat 4 PPSMI. Diperolehi darihttp://drjj.uitm.edu.my/DRJJ/TOBIAS/DrJJ%20PPSMI%20article%2018100 8.pdfJemaah Nazir Sekolah (2006). Info PPSMI-Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematikdalam bahasa Inggeris. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Joash, E, D, S. (2015). English proficiency crucial to progress, says DrMahathir.The Star, Diperolehi darihttp://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/11/22/english-proficiency-dr- mahathir/.Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim & Meor Ibrahim Kamaruddin. (2006). Masalah Pembelajaran Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris Di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 2 Luar Bandar. Paperpresented at Annual Conference on Teacher Education. Malaysia: Kota Kinabalu, September.Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational Research: Quantative andqualitative approaches. Boston, MA: Ally & Bacon.Julianus Anggau. (2007). Masalah dan Cabaran Pelaksanaan dan Pengajaran Sains dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris di sebuah Sekolah Menengah Pedalaman Daerah Ranau. MastersDissertation. Universiti Malaya.Kajian hanya 4% kuasai BI melalui PPSMI. Diperolehi darihttps://www.malaysiakini.com/news/100432/kajian-hanya-4%-kuasai-BI- melalui-PPSMI.Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat (2013). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -2025. Putrajaya.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Garis panduan DLP Versi 1.0 2015.Kenyataan Akhbar YB Tan Sri Musa Mohamad mengenai perlaksanaan pengajaran danpembelajaran Sains dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris. Diperolehi darihttp://www.moe.gov.my/keratanBI.aspKili, K. A. (2015, June 20). Heed Sultans call on English, Says Johor MCA. The Star,p. 14.Kok, T. (2015, June 13). Heed Johor Sultans Advice. The Star, p. 58.Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New AgeInternational.Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.Lindholm-Leary,K. (2016). Students perceptions of bilingualism in Spanish and Mandarin Dual Language Programs. International Multilingual Journal, 10(1), 59-70.Majid, N., Jaaman, S. H., Darus, M., Nazar, R. M., Ramli, S, N. M., Suradi, N. R. M., et al (2011).The readiness of Science and Mathematics lecturers to teach in English from Students Perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 18, 342347.Mansor, N. (2007). Using of English in teaching Mathematics and Science: Is the Performancesatisfactory?Marohaini Mohd Yusoff. (2013). Penyelidikan Kualitatif, Pengalaman Kerja LapanganKajian, (Edisi Pertama). Penerbit Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Melor Md Yunus & Saiful Islam Ahmad Sukri (2017). The Use of English in TeachingMathematics and Science: The PPSMI Policy vis-a-vis The DLP. Advances in Language andLiterary Studies. Vol. 8(1), 133-142.Menon, S. (2016, October 6). 841 schools expected to implement DLP. The Star.Diperolehi dari http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/10/06/841-schools-expected-to-implement-dlp/Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (3rd ed). SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Mohandas, P. & Rajaratnam, P. OC. (2015). A policy analysis of the delivery of primaryand secondary school Mathematics and Science in English. Education Research and Perspectives,4(2015), 246-285.Mohd Fadhili Yahaya, Mohd Asri Mohd Noor, Ahmad Azman Mokhtar, Rafizah Mohd Rawian,Mahmod Othman & Kamaruzaman Jusoff. (2009). Teaching of Mathematics and Science inEnglish: The Teachers Voices. English Language Teaching. Vol. 2(2), 141-147.Mohd Majid Konting. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan, Edisi ke 7. Kuala Lumpur;Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd Nasaruddin Basran. (2006). Perlaksanaan kurikulum Bahasa Melayu.Tesis yang tidakditerbitkan, Universiti Malaya.Mohd Noor, N., & Ching Fen, H. (2011). Penguasaan Bahasa Inggeris DanHubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Dalam Matematik (Satu Tinjauan Ke Atas Pelajar Tahun Dua FakultiPendidikan). , I(1). Diperolehi dari http://eprints.utm.my/11757/1/Penguasaan_Bahasa_Inggeris_Dan_Hubungannya_Dengan_Pencapaian_Dalam_Matema tik.pdfMokhtar. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan Kuantitatif Dalam Pendidikan, Edisi Pertama.Bandar Seri Bagawan; Brunei.Morse, J. M. (2011). Molding Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative Health Research,21(8), 10191021.Muda, N., Ismail, W. R., Shahabuddin, F. A., Samsudin, H. B., Suradi, N. R. M.,Majid, N., et al (2012). Teaching Science and Mathematics in English steering mastery in Englishlanguage amongst sciences students in UKM. Proceedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,59(2012): 670-677.Muhammad Faisal Abdul Aziz. (2016). ABIM kecam usaha mengembalikan PPSMI melalui pintu belakang.DalamAbdullah Hassan & Zainal Abidin Borhan (Eds.),Kami Bantah DLP(93-95). Kuala Lumpur: Gapena & Persatuan Penterjemah Malaysia.Murali, R. S. N. (2015, November 9). 1,000 students drop out due to poor command of the language.The Star. Diperolehi darihttp://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/11/09/poor-english-stops-medical-grads-1000-students-drop-out-due-to-poor-command-of-thelanguage/Nadiah H. B & Melor M. Y (2018). Dual Language Programme: Parents Perception. 11th InternationalConference on Language, Education and Innovation 2018- 047Noorzeliana Idris, Chum, U.P., Nor Suhara Fadzil & Nuzul Harlina Abd Rahman.(2017). Kajian pelaksanaanDual Language Programme (DLP) dan Highly ImmersiveProgramme (HIP).Unit Penyelidikan Makro Sektor Penyelidikan dan Penilaian: KPMNor, F. M. & Aziz, M. A. (2008). ETeMS: The implications on learner. Diperolehi dari http://www.iiu.edu.my/ilc/?download=11-e08.pdfNordin, A., Husin, H., Jonid, M., & Rosni, W. (2005). Scientific Language and Its Implication onScience Learning Among School Students which Undergo English Medium of Instruction. PusatPengurusan Penyelidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Nordin, A., & See Boon, Y. (2010). Persepsi Guru Sains PPSMI Terhadap Masalah PerlaksanaanPengajaran Subjek Sains (PPSMI) Di Sekolah Rendah Kawasan Skudai, Johor Bahru. , I(1). Diperolehi dari http://eprints.utm.my/11669/1/Persepsi_Guru_Sains_PPSMI_Terhadap_Masalah_Perlaksanaan_Pengajaran_Subjek_Sains.pdfNoriza Majid, Jaaman, S.H, Darus M., Roslinda M., N., Ramli, S.N.M, Suradi, N. R. M., et al(2011). The Readiness of Mathematics and Science Lecturers to Teach in English fromStudents Perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 18, 342-347.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.048.Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Method: Qualitative and QuantitativeApproaches, 7th Edition. Needham Height: Allyn and Bacon.Onishi, N. (2010, July 25). As English spreads, Indonesians fear for their language.The New York Times. Diperolehi dari http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/asia/26indo.html.Othman Lebar. (2007). Penyelidikan Kualitatif, Pengenalan Kepada Teori Dan Metod (Cet 2). TanjungMalim : Penerbitan Universiti Pendidikan Sultan IdrisPallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS (Edisike-3). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Pallant. J (2010). SPSS Survival Manual A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS forWindows ,4rd Edition, Crows West , New South Wales.Pandian, A. & Ramiah, R. (2004). Mathematics and Science in English: Teacher Voice.Diperolehi dari http://kajianberasaskansekolah.files.wordpress.com/2008/03mathematics_and_science_in_english.pdf.Piawaian Bahasa dan Kualiti Bahasa Inggeris. (2016). English language education reform inMalaysia: The Roadmap 2015-2025.Pim, L. H. (2016, October 17). Stupid turn to education 30 years ago stupid, says Adenan. TheBorneo Post. Diperolehi darihttp://www.theborneopost.com/2016/10/17/cm-stupid-turn-to-education-30-years-ago-stupid-says-adenan/Planas, N. & Civil, M. (2013). Language-as-resource and language-as-political: tensions inthe bilingual mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Program Imersif Tinggi (HIP): Pelaksanaan & Jenis Aktiviti Yang Terlibat. Diperolehi darihttp://www.cikgushare.com/2016/06/program-imersif-tinggi- hip- pelaksanaan.htmlRahim, N. A. A. (2010). MBMMBI and PPSMI are two different animals. The MalaysianInsider. Diperolehi darihttp://www.themalaysianinsider.com/mobile/breakingviews/article/MBMMI-and-PPSMI-are-two-different-animals- Noor-Azimah-Abdul-Rahim.Rahim, N. A. A (2013, March 7). Be committed to English challenge. The Star.Diperolehi dari http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2013/03/07/be-committed-to-english-challenge/Recker, M. (2007). Scientific Inquiry and Educational Research: The Mixed Method Approach. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam Seminar Pasca Siswazah, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Reljic, G., Ferring, D., & Martin, R. (2014). A Meta-Analysis on the effectiveness of bilingualprograms in Europe. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1-37.Richard B. Baldauf Jr., Robert B. Kaplan, Nkonko Kamwangamalu & PaulineBryant (2011): Success orfailure of primary second/foreign language programmes in Asia: what dothe data tell us? CurrentIssues in Language Planning, 12:2, 309- 323Ridhwan, A. (2009). Perhimpunan penulis-penulis muda Malaysia. Diperolehi dari http://1anwaridhwan.blogspot.com/2009_05_01_archive.html.Roasharimah Ibrahim. 2017. Faktor dalaman dan luaran yang mempengaruhi penguasaan Bahasa Melayu murid-murid Cina. Kertas Projek Sarjana Pendidikan.Fakulti Pendidikan,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Rozmi Ismail. (2013). Metodologi Penyelidikan, Teori Dan Praktis. Bangi; Penerbit UniversitiKebangsaan MalaysiaSaalbach, H., Eckstein, D., Andri, N., Hobi, R., & Graber, RH. (2014). when language of instructionand language of application differ: Cognitive costs of bilingual mathematics learning. Learning andInstruction, 26(2013), 36-44.Sabri A., Tengku Zawawi T. Z., & Aziz O. (2006). Isu-isu dalam Pendidikan Matematik.Kuala Lumpur. Terbitan Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn BhdSalam, N. H. A., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Examining classroom interactions in secondary Mathematics classrooms in Brunei Darussalam. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 92-103.Samah, A. A. (2008). The Development of English Language Policy in Malaysia: The New Policy onScience and Mathematics in the Medium of English. Unpublished PhD thesis, Universityof Sussex.Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (Ed Ke-2). New York:Wiley & Son, Inc.Selamat, A., Esa, A., Saad, S. S., & Atim,A. (2011). Teaching and learning Mathematics and Science in English in primary schoolsin the state of Johor, Malaysia. Journal of Education, 16(2011), 61-73.Selamat, A., Esa, A., Saad, S. S., & Atim, A. (2011). Teaching and learningMathematics and Science in English in primary Schools in the state of Johor, Malaysia. Journal ofEducation, 16(2011), 61-73.Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between Languages and Discourses: Language Practices inPrimary Multilingual Mathematics Classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies inMathematics. Vol. 43(3), 243-269.Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). Languages and mathematics achievementsamong rural and primary four pupils: A Malaysian experience. Journal of Science and MathematicsEducation in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 65-85. Diperolehi dari http://www.recsam.edu.my/R&D_Journals/YEAR2010/june2010vol1/parmjit(65-85).pdfSiti Rahayah Ariffin. (2003). Teori, Konsep & Amalan Dalam Pengukuran Dan Penilaian. Bangi; Pusat Pembangunan Akademik Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Suliman, A.,Nor, M. Y. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Dual-language Programme (DLP) studentlevel of enthusiasm and confidence: A preliminary study.Journal of Teaching & Learning English in Multicultural Contexts2 (1), 35- 44.Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.Online Reading in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). Diperolehi darihttp://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.Steele, J. L., Slater, R. O., Zamarro, G.,Miller, T., Li, J., Burkhauser, S. & Bacon, M. (2017).Effects of Dual-Language Immersion Programs on Student Achievement: Evidence from Lottery Data.American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 54(1), 282-306.Syofia Ulfah, Zamri Mahamod & Jamaludin Badusah. 2015. Komunikasiinterpersonaldirektif guru bahasa Indonesia ketika memulakanpengajaran.Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2 (2): 71-82.Teo, W. L. & Roslinda Rosli (2017). Rural School Students Perception about LearningMathematics in English. Journal of Applied Sciences 12 (2):148-156Teruskan Dual Language Programme (2018, Jan 4). hmetroTuah Ishak & Mohini Mohamed. (2010). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematikdalam Bahasa Inggeris (PPSMI): Suatu Isu Berulang. Jurnal Teknologi. Vol. 53, 95-106.Thang, S. W. & Olaybal, D. L. (2006). Creating and testing Science in English.The Star Letters. Opinion.18.04.2013. Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim. Chairman, Parent ActionGroup for Education Malaysia (PAGE). Be committed to English challenge.The Star. (2015, October 6). Downfall due to poor English. Diperolehi darihttp://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/10/06/downfall-due-to-poor- english-many-terengganu-top- students- fare-badly-in-muet/website for Malaysian secondary one students. MalaysianOnline Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(1), 36-42.Thirusanku, J & Yunus, M. M. (2014). Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 10(14),254-260.Tran, N. A., Behseta, S., Ellis, M., Martinez-Cruz, A. & Contreras, J. (2015). TheEffects of Spanish English Dual Language Immersion on Student Achievementin Science and Mathematics. E-Journal of Education Policy. 2015 Special Issue.Yamamoto, B. A., Saito, T., Shibuya, M., Ishikura, Y., Gyenes, A., Kim, V., et al (2016, June 16).Final Report on Implementation and Impact of the Dual Language IB DP Programmein Japanese Secondary Schools.Yunus, M. M. & Hern, G. H. (2011). Malaysian Undergraduates perceptions and attitudes on bilingual education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011),2618-2622.Zamri Mahamod. 2016b. Psikolinguistik dan pengajaran bahasa.Bangi: Penerbitan FakultiPendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaZuraini Ramli. (2014). Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science in a Secondor Third Language. Doctorate Dissertation. Deakin University.

Similar Items