Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak

Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran</p><p>guru di dalam bilik darjah. Faktor-faktor yang ingin dikenal pasti ialah konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran dan personaliti guru. Kajian ini mengg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2021
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7254
Tags: Add Tag
pentaksiran 1
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7254
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran</p><p>guru di dalam bilik darjah. Faktor-faktor yang ingin dikenal pasti ialah konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran dan personaliti guru. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif yang</p><p>menggunakan soal selidik sebagai instrumen. Seramai 330 orang guru tahap satu dipilih</p><p>sebagai responden melalui persampelan rawak berkadar. Sebanyak 30 daripada 68 buah</p><p>sekolah rendah daerah Gombak, Selangor dipilih melalui persampelan rawak mudah.</p><p>Data dianalisis melalui statistik deskripsi dan inferens. Dapatan deskripsi menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa 6 daripada 10 subkonstruk didapati berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Analisis</p><p>korelasi pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan kuat</p><p>antara konsepsi pentaksiran dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.615,p=0.00). Namun</p><p>begitu, hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan sederhana berlaku di antara personaliti</p><p>dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.333,p=0.00) dan personaliti dengan konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran (r=0.334,p=0.00). Analisis regresi pelbagai menunjukkan bahawa konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran dan personaliti mampu menjelaskan 39.7% variasi dari amalan pentaksiran</p><p>(R2=0.397,F(2,327)=107.468,p=0.00). Konsepsi pentaksiran mampu meramalkan</p><p>amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.567,p=0.00) dan personaliti juga mampu meramalkan</p><p>amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.143,p=0.00). Kesimpulannya konsepsi pentaksiran dan</p><p>personaliti mempunyai pengaruh ke atas amalan pentaksiran, dan peramal terbaik bagi</p><p>amalan pentaksiran adalah konsepsi pentaksiran. Implikasi kajian ini adalah diharap</p><p>pihak KPM dapat memantapkan lagi pengetahuan guru tentang konsepsi pentaksiran</p><p>iaitu tentang tujuan pentaksiran dengan menyediakan latihan atau kursus bersesuaian</p><p>kerana ia memberi pengaruh yang besar ke atas amalan pentaksiran guru.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
author_facet Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
author_sort Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
title Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
title_short Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
title_full Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
title_fullStr Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
title_full_unstemmed Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
title_sort faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah gombak
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7254
_version_ 1747833371495497728
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:72542022-07-18 Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak 2021 Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran</p><p>guru di dalam bilik darjah. Faktor-faktor yang ingin dikenal pasti ialah konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran dan personaliti guru. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif yang</p><p>menggunakan soal selidik sebagai instrumen. Seramai 330 orang guru tahap satu dipilih</p><p>sebagai responden melalui persampelan rawak berkadar. Sebanyak 30 daripada 68 buah</p><p>sekolah rendah daerah Gombak, Selangor dipilih melalui persampelan rawak mudah.</p><p>Data dianalisis melalui statistik deskripsi dan inferens. Dapatan deskripsi menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa 6 daripada 10 subkonstruk didapati berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Analisis</p><p>korelasi pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan kuat</p><p>antara konsepsi pentaksiran dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.615,p=0.00). Namun</p><p>begitu, hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan sederhana berlaku di antara personaliti</p><p>dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.333,p=0.00) dan personaliti dengan konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran (r=0.334,p=0.00). Analisis regresi pelbagai menunjukkan bahawa konsepsi</p><p>pentaksiran dan personaliti mampu menjelaskan 39.7% variasi dari amalan pentaksiran</p><p>(R2=0.397,F(2,327)=107.468,p=0.00). Konsepsi pentaksiran mampu meramalkan</p><p>amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.567,p=0.00) dan personaliti juga mampu meramalkan</p><p>amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.143,p=0.00). Kesimpulannya konsepsi pentaksiran dan</p><p>personaliti mempunyai pengaruh ke atas amalan pentaksiran, dan peramal terbaik bagi</p><p>amalan pentaksiran adalah konsepsi pentaksiran. Implikasi kajian ini adalah diharap</p><p>pihak KPM dapat memantapkan lagi pengetahuan guru tentang konsepsi pentaksiran</p><p>iaitu tentang tujuan pentaksiran dengan menyediakan latihan atau kursus bersesuaian</p><p>kerana ia memberi pengaruh yang besar ke atas amalan pentaksiran guru.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7254 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7254 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia <p>A.R. Peterson. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor</p><p>Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis. Marketing Letters. 11(3), 261-275.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Halim al-Muhammadi. (2009). Manfaat ilmu cara terbaik hargai jasa guru:</p><p>pendidik pikul tanggungjawab berat bentuk generasi berdaya saing, pemimpin</p><p>masa depan. Berita Harian. him. 4 l.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Zubir Abdul Ghani. (2007). Pelaksanaan PBS di kalangan guru Tingkatan 3.</p><p>Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan.Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Abu Bakar Nordin. (1986). Asas Penilaian Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Longman</p><p>Malaysia Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Acar-Erdol, T., & Yildizli, H. (2018). Classroom assessment practices of teachers in</p><p>Turkey. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 587602</p><p></p><p>Airasian, P. W. (1997). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Airasian, P. W. (2001). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications (4th edition</p><p>ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitude, personality and behaviour (2 nd ed.). New York: Open</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Akhbar Ibrahim & Siti Zaliha Reduan. (2002). Penilaian prestasi berasaskan sekolah:</p><p>Pelaksanaan dan kesediaan guru. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Persidangan</p><p>Kebangsaan Penilaian Kemajuan Berasaskan Sekolah, Universiti Sains</p><p>Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.</p><p></p><p>Akhiar Pardi, Shamsina Shamsuddin dan Muhammad Kushairi Jusoh. (2012). Asas</p><p>Kepimpinan dan Perkembangan Profesional Guru. Kuala Lumpur: Freemind</p><p>Horizons Sdn. Bhd</p><p></p><p>Ali, A. (2006). Conducting Research in Education and the Social Sciences. Enugu:</p><p>Tashiwa Networks Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Ali, R.M., & Veloo, A. (2017). Teachers autonomy and accountability in assessing</p><p>Students physical education in school-based assessment. In I. H. Amzat & N.</p><p>P. Valdez (Eds.), Teacher development and towards professional empowerment</p><p>practices perspectives ccross borders (p. 71). Spingers</p><p></p><p>Alkharusi, H. (2011). Validity and reliability of the attitude toward educational</p><p>measurement inventory. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 612</p><p>620</p><p></p><p>Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart &</p><p>Winston.</p><p></p><p>Angelo, T. (2001). Classroom assessment: Guidelines for success. Essays on Teaching</p><p>Excellence. http://teaching.uchicago.edu/pod/angelo.html</p><p></p><p>Aniza., & Zamri. (2015). Tahap Kemahiran Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah</p><p>Dalam Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Berdasarkan Jantina,</p><p>Opsyen Dan Tempat Mengajar. Fakulti Pendidikan. UKM.</p><p></p><p>Ariston Shah Muhaimin. (2007). Keseragaman Antara Pernyataan Hasil</p><p>Pembelajaran Kursus dan Item Soalan Peperiksaan Akhir Fakulti Kejuruteraan</p><p>Awam dan Fakulti Kejuruteraan Elektrik UTM. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia:</p><p>Disertasi Sarjana</p><p></p><p>Asrul Azmin bin Masiron. (2010). Hubungan antara personaliti dan penghargaan</p><p>kendiri pelajar cemerlang akademik. MRSM Pontian.</p><p></p><p>Azhani Adnan. (2008). Personaliti Guru: Pengaruh ke atas Pengajaran dan</p><p>Pembelajaran. Tanjung Malim. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Azhari Mariani. (2016). Model Pengajaran Kreatif Berteraskan Kompetensi,</p><p>Personaliti Dan Rangsangan Kreativiti Guru Matematik Berpendekatan</p><p>Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur. Desertasi ijazah Doktor Falsafah (Pendidikan</p><p>Matematik)</p><p></p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Jamaludin Ramli & Mazeni Ismail. (2010). Stress dalam Kalangan Guru</p><p>Sekolah Menengah di Empat Buah Negeri di Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of</p><p>Educators and Education, Vol. 25, 103-136, 2010.</p><p></p><p>Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in</p><p>Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.</p><p>http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393203</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Jurnal Kurikulum. ISSN:1511-2942</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive</p><p>theory. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1992). Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In R.</p><p>Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp.355-394).</p><p>Washington, DC: Hemisphere.</p><p></p><p>Bandura,A. (1991). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. In R. Schwarzer & R. A.</p><p>Wicklund (Eds.), Anxiety and self-focused attention (pp. 89-110). New York:</p><p>Harwood.</p><p></p><p>Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What s at stake in high-stakes testing:</p><p>Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384-397.</p><p></p><p>Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers beliefs about assessment. In</p><p>H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher</p><p>beliefs (pp. 284300). New York, NY: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2017). U.S. teachers conceptions of the</p><p>purposes of assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 107-116.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.017</p><p></p><p>Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and</p><p>jobperformance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.</p><p></p><p>Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: some dimensions underlying new approaches</p><p>to educational assessment, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1),</p><p>1-17.</p><p></p><p>Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in</p><p>Education, 5(1), 7 -73</p><p></p><p>Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J.</p><p>Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Bonner, S. M. (2016). Teachers perceptions about assessment: competing narrative</p><p>, in Handbook of human and sosial conditions in assessment, eds G. T. L.</p><p>Brown and L. R. Harris. (New York, NY: Routledge), 21-39.</p><p></p><p>Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Teacher candidates perceptions about grading</p><p>and constructivist teaching. Educational Assessment, 14(2), 5777.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903039411</p><p></p><p>Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment,</p><p>Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved October 7, 2010 from</p><p>http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L. (2002). Teachers conceptions of assessment. Unpublished Doctoral</p><p>Dissertation. University of Auckland, New Zealand.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L. (2004b). Measuring attitude with positively packed self- report ratings:</p><p>Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports, 94,</p><p>1015e1024.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L. (2006). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Validation of an</p><p>abridged instrument. Psychological Reports, 99, 166e170.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Improvement and accountability functions of</p><p>assessment:impact on teachers thinking and action, in Encyclopedia of</p><p>EducationalPhilosophy and Theory, ed A. M. Peters (Singapore: Springer), 1</p><p>6.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L., & Gao, L. (2015). Chinese teachers conceptions of assessment for</p><p>and of learning : Six competing and complementary purp</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of social and human</p><p>conditions in assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009).</p><p>Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers'</p><p>conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles,</p><p>Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363. doi:10.1080/09695940903319737</p><p></p><p>Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers conceptions of</p><p>assessment: The impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and</p><p>Teacher Education, 27(1), 210-220.</p><p></p><p>Brown, G.T.L. (2009). Teachers self-reported assessment practices and conceptions:</p><p>Using Structural Equation Modelling to examine measurement and structural</p><p>models in T.Teo (ed), Structural Equation Modeling In Educational Research:</p><p>Concepts and applications, 243-266: Sense Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Brynt, N. C., & Barnes, L. L. B. (1997). Development and validation of the attitude</p><p>toward educational measurement inventory. Educational and Psychological</p><p>Measurement, 57(5), 870875.</p><p></p><p>Butterfield, S., William, A., & Marr, A. (1999). Talking about assessment: mentorstudent</p><p>dialogues about pupil assessment in initial teacher training. Assessment</p><p>in Education, 6(2), pp.225-246</p><p></p><p>Chang, S. F. (1988). Teachers' Assessment Practices: Assessing Phase II Pupils'</p><p>Progress InKBSR English. Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya</p><p></p><p>Chappuis, S. (2008). The best value in formative assessment. Pages 14-19.</p><p></p><p>Chong Chee Keong, Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani & Zuraidah Abdullah. (2016).</p><p>Amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional di sekolah berprestasi tinggi</p><p>Malaysia: sebuah Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di Sarawak. Jurnal</p><p>kepimpinan pendidikan, 3 (1), 43-70.</p><p></p><p>Chua Yan Piaw, (2009). Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan: Ujian Regresi, Analisis</p><p>Faktor dan Analisis SEM. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan-Asas Statistik Penyelidikan</p><p>(Buku 2), Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.</p><p></p><p>Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S., Shawn, M., & Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers assessment</p><p>practices: preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink, Educational Assessment,</p><p>3, 159-179.</p><p></p><p>Clower, C. E., & Bothwell, R. K. (2001). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship</p><p>between the Big Five and Inmate Recidivism. Journal of Research in Personality,</p><p>35(2), 231237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2312</p><p></p><p>Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical</p><p>practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5-</p><p>13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5</p><p></p><p>Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis:</p><p>Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical</p><p>Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10, 1-9</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review</p><p>of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.</p><p></p><p>David, A. Payne. (2003). Applied educational assessment. Wadsworth Thomson</p><p>Learning.</p><p></p><p>Desforges, C. (1989). Testing And Assessment. London: Cassell Education Limited.</p><p></p><p>DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development Theory and Applications. (2nd ed.).</p><p>Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications</p><p></p><p>Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Segers, M. (2006). Learning and the emerging new</p><p>assessment culture. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou</p><p>(Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present, and future trends (pp. 191-206).</p><p>Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier.</p><p></p><p>Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. (1981, 1986, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1996).</p><p>Productivity Environmental Preference Survey. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems</p><p>Inc.</p><p></p><p>Earl, Lorna M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to</p><p>maximize student learning</p><p></p><p>Faizah bt Abd. Ghani & Nagarajan Kupusamy. (2012). Hubungan Trait Personaliti dan</p><p>Kecekapan Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Dalam Pelaksanaan</p><p>Perkhidmatan Bimbingan dan Kaunseling di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Pasir</p><p>Gudang Johor. Journal of Educational Psyachology & Counseling. (6) June</p><p>2012. 92-115</p><p></p><p>Feshbach, S., Weiner, B., & Bohart, A. C. (1996). Personality (4th ed.). Toronto: D.C.</p><p>Heath.</p><p></p><p>Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief. attitude, intention and behavior: An</p><p>introduction of theory and research. Philippine: Adison-Wesley Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Follmer, D. J., & Stefanou, C. R. (2014). Examining the correspondence between a</p><p>direct and an indirect measure of executive functions: Implications for schoolbased</p><p>assessment. The School Psychologist, 68(3), 12-18.</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J.R., and Wallen, N.E., (1996), How to Design and Evaluate Research. USA:</p><p>Mc. Fraw-Hill Inc.</p><p></p><p>Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual</p><p>factors and teachers assessment practices: An integrative review of research.</p><p>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 22, 475494.</p><p>doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445</p><p></p><p>Gay , L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Education research. Competencies for Analysis and</p><p>Applications, New Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin.(2018) . Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam</p><p>Pendidikan, Amalan Dan Analisis Kajian. Ed. Kedua. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali, D., & Sofean, H. (2015). Metodologi penyelidikan dan pendidikan (1st ed.).</p><p>Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: amalan</p><p>dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Gonzales, R. DLC (1999). Assessing thinking skills in the classroom: Types, techniques</p><p>and taxonomy of measures of thinking skills in higher education Philippines</p><p>Journal of Educational Measurement, 9 (1), 17-26.</p><p></p><p>Gonzales, R. & Fugan, C. (2012). Exploring the Conceptual and Psychometric</p><p>Properties of Classroom Assessment. The International Journal of Educational</p><p>and Psychological Assessment, 9(2).</p><p></p><p>Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A</p><p>meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523-547.</p><p></p><p>Grounland, N. E. (1982). Constructing Achievement Test, 3rd Ed.. New Jwrsey:</p><p>Prentice Hall Inc: Engle Word Cliffs</p><p></p><p>Grubb, W.N. 2002. Who Am I: The Inadequacy of Career Information in The</p><p>Information Age. Berkeley: U.S.A.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Pearson New</p><p>International Edition: Multivariat Data Analysis. Exploratory Data Analysis in</p><p>Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0_3</p><p></p><p>Hair, Jr.,J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2010). Multivariate data</p><p>analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Hale, G (1980). Effect of Item Disclosure on TOEFL Performance, Research Report</p><p>No. 8, Educational Testing Servises: Princeton, NJ</p><p></p><p>Hashiroh Hussain & Norshuhada Shiratuddin. (2016). Kebolehpercayaan dan korelasi</p><p>elemen multimedia dan antara muka tablet dalam menilai penceritaan digital.</p><p>Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 31, 2745.</p><p>http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/apjee2016.31.3</p><p></p><p>Hay/McBer.(1996). Scaled Competency Dictionary. Boston: Hay/McBer.</p><p></p><p>Heinstrom. J. (2003). Five Personality Dimensions and Their Insluence on Information</p><p>Behaviour. (9) 1. http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html</p><p></p><p>Hill, M. F. (2002). Remapping the assessment landscape : primary teacher</p><p>reconstructing assessment in self-managing school. Hamilton, NZ: the</p><p>university of Waikato</p><p></p><p>Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth</p><p>trade-off. Joumal of Organizational Behavior, 17(6),627-637</p><p></p><p>Hussein, A. (2014). Implementation of strategic education policy plan at micro-level</p><p>contexts: Management and leadership challenges. Malaysian Online Journal of</p><p>Educational Management</p><p></p><p>Idris, N. (2016). Penilaian pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah dalam</p><p>kalangan guru. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Jacob, R., and Parkinson, J. (2015). The Potential for School-Based Interventions That</p><p>Target Executive Function to Improve Academic Achievement:A Review.</p><p>Review of Educational Research, 85(4): 512-552.</p><p></p><p>Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing And Using Tests Effectively. San</p><p>Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers</p><p></p><p>John, O.P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy : history, measurement,</p><p>and theoritical perspectives. Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2,</p><p>102-138.</p><p></p><p>Jones, S., & Tanner, H. (2008). Assessment: A practical guide for secondary Teachers</p><p>(2nd ed.) London: Continuum.</p><p></p><p>Kapambwe, M. W. (2010). The implementation of school based continuous assessment</p><p>(CA) in Zambia. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(3), 099-107. Retrieved</p><p>from http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR</p><p></p><p>Karom Kingsoka. (2010) . Sikap yang Harus Dimiliki oleh Seorang Guru. Makalah</p><p>keperibadian guru.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Laporan tahunan 2018 : Pelan</p><p>Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2011). Buku Panduan Pengurusan dan</p><p>Pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS), Sekolah Rendah. LP:</p><p>Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Putrajaya: KPM.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik</p><p>Darjah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Surat siaran bil. 14/2018: Pemansuhan</p><p>amalan peperiksaan pertengahan dan akhir tahun murid tahap 1 di sekolah</p><p>rendah KPM mulai tahun 2019</p><p></p><p>Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX:</p><p>Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p></p><p>Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing : A practical approach to design and evaluation.</p><p>Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.</p><p></p><p>Krejcie, R.V. dan Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sampel size for research</p><p>activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.</p><p></p><p>Kumutha Raman & Hamida Yamat. (2014). A Case Study: Barriers Teachers Face in</p><p>Integrating ICT during English Lessons. Malaysian Online Journal of</p><p>Educational Technology, v2 n3 p11-19 2014</p><p></p><p>Laimah Sungap. (2017). Hubungan antara amalan pengurusan kurikulum, kepuasan</p><p>kerja dan komitmen kerja dalam kalangan ketua panitia berdasarkan prestasi</p><p>akademik sekolah menengah kawasan pendalaman atas Negeri Sabah. Journal</p><p>of global business and social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5872.</p><p></p><p>Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Powers, L., Diebold, T., Germer, K., Common, E. A., &</p><p>Brunsting, N. (2015). Improving teachers' knowledge of functional assessmentbased</p><p>interventions: Outcomes of a professional development series. Education</p><p>and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 93-120.</p><p></p><p>Langford, P. H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and</p><p>abridging Shafer's (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual</p><p>Differences, 35(5), 11271140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00323-</p><p>9</p><p></p><p>Lay, Y. F., & Hoon, K. C. (2012). Pengenalan kepada pendekatan kuantitatif dalam</p><p>penyelidikan pendidikan. Sabah: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.</p><p></p><p>Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice Teachers' Personality Traits and</p><p>Engagement in Creative Activities as Predictors of Their Support for Children's</p><p>Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82-94.</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran</p><p>Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). LPM: Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future</p><p>directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347382.</p><p></p><p>Lim Chong Hin. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantiatif dan kualitatif.</p><p>Selangor: McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Looi-Chin, C. & Soubakeavathi, R. (2013). English language assessment in Malaysia:</p><p>Teachers Practices In Test Preparation. Issues in Language Studies, 2(2), 24-</p><p>39.</p><p></p><p>M. David Miller et al. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. IV. Title.</p><p>LB3051. 1 545 2009</p><p></p><p>Maarof Redzuan dan Haslinda Abdullah. (2004). Psikologi. Ed 2. Kuala Lumpur: Mc</p><p>Graw Hill.</p><p></p><p>MacCallum et al. (1999). Sampel Size In Factor Analysis. Ohio state university.</p><p></p><p>Madaus, G. F (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.),</p><p>Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society</p><p>for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</p><p></p><p>Mahaya Salleh, Azizah Sarkowi, Mohd Fairuz Jafar, Zakaria Mohd Arif & Hariyanti</p><p>Abd Hamid. (2019). Tahap Literasi Guru Terhadap Pendekatan Dalam</p><p>Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN</p><p>2019 eISBN 978-967-2122-77-7).</p><p></p><p>Mahmood Nazar Mohamed (1990). Pengantar Psikologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., & Vignoles, A. (2015). A comparison of teacher and testbased</p><p>assessment for Spanish primary and secondary students. Educational</p><p>Research, 57(1), 1-21.</p><p></p><p>Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us.</p><p>Instructional Science, 10, 177-200,</p><p></p><p>Martyn Long. (2000). The Psychology of Education. London & New York:</p><p>RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor & Francis Group</p><p></p><p>Mat Ali, M. A. (2006). Amalan Pentaksiran Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Universiti</p><p>Malaya: Tesis PhD.</p><p></p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2004). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective</p><p>instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education</p><p></p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2008). Assessment Essentials For Standard-Based Education (2nd</p><p>ed.). California: Corwin Press.</p><p></p><p>Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test</p><p>scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent?Educational Measurement: Issues and</p><p>Practice,8(1), 1422.</p><p></p><p>Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmannn, I.J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education</p><p>and psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.</p><p></p><p>Michaelides & Brown. (2009), Testing models of teachers conceptions of assessment</p><p>with samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. Paper presented at the biannual</p><p>conference of the International Test Commission, Hong Kong.</p><p></p><p>Mirian, B. M., & Zulnaidi, H. (2020). Mathematics Teachers Conceptions of</p><p>Assessment: Gender and Academic Qualification Comparisons. International</p><p>Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13217a</p><p></p><p>Mishel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbitan</p><p>Universiti Teknologi Malaysia</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Najib, A. G. (2016). Prinsip asas penilaian program pendidikan. Johor:</p><p>Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Press.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Azhar, M. A. (2006). Amalan pentaksiran di sekolah menengah. Tesis Ijazah</p><p>Kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa Dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (1993). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa & Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd. Nasir Masran. (2000). Guru cemerlang: Personaliti dan kurikulum. Kertas kerja</p><p>yang dibentang dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan</p><p>dalam pendidikan 2000, Berita Harian.</p><p></p><p>Moiinvaziri, M. (2015). University teachers' conception of assessment: A structural</p><p>equation modeling approach. American Institute of Science, 1(3), 75-85.</p><p></p><p>Mokhtar Ismail. (1995). Penilaian di Bilik kuliah dan makmal. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J., & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Chapter 4: Validity in Educational</p><p>Assessment. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 109162.</p><p>doi:10.3102/0091732X030001109</p><p></p><p>Ng, See Ngean (1991). Pengukuran dan Penilaian dalam Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya :</p><p>Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Noorlyda Abd Latib. (2012). Mengapa hasil pembelajaran harus ditentukan? Retrieved</p><p>fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/NoorlydaAbdLatip/hasilpembelajarankpd4033</p><p>presentation.</p><p></p><p>Nor Haiza. (2010). Rekod berterusan untuk mengesan perkembangan kanak-kanak.</p><p>Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/37749354/rekod-berterusan-untukmengesan-</p><p>perkembangan-kanak-kanak.</p><p></p><p>Nor Hasnida Md Ghazali, Baharim Yaakub dan Afian Akhbar Mustam. (2012). Why</p><p>do We Need to Change? Teachers attitude towards School-based Assessment</p><p>System. Londons First International Conference on Social Sciences and</p><p>Humanities in the Islamic World</p><p></p><p>Nor Shafrin Ahmad, Fadzilah Amzah & Rahimi Che Aman. (2009) . Kemahiran</p><p>komunikasi guru pelatih Universiti Sains Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidik dan</p><p>Pendidikan 24: 125-142.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris dan Nik Azis Nik Pa, (2008). Perjuangan Memperkasakan Pendidikan Di</p><p>Malaysia: Pengalaman 50 Tahun Merdeka. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill</p><p>Education.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Malaysia: McGraw-</p><p>Hill Education (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Noraini, Idris. (2005). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Second Edition. Kuala</p><p>Lumpur: UtusanPublication Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Retrieved</p><p>December 2012 from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html (accessed</p><p>17/7/2012).</p><p></p><p>Pajares, F., and Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self efficacy and self concept beliefs</p><p>in mathematical solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,</p><p>86, 193203.</p><p></p><p>Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative Teaching and Its Assessment. Faculty of</p><p>Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA</p><p></p><p>Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Gombak. (2017). Laporan Pelaksanaan Dialog Prestasi</p><p>Program LINUS 2.0. Saringan 2</p><p></p><p>Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for</p><p>educational leaders (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, PPK. (2001). ISBN 983-2340-36-5 1. Study skills. I.</p><p>Judul. 371.30281</p><p></p><p>Ramlah Ab Khalid, Jamil Ahmad & Analisa Hamdan. (2015). Pembentukan Sikap</p><p>Positif Guru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Aktiviti Pentaksiran. Journal of</p><p>Personalized Learning 1(1):77-84.</p><p></p><p>Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A</p><p>10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal</p><p>of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212.</p><p></p><p>Ravikumar A/L K.Varatharaj. (2015). Autonomi Guru Dan Amalan Pentaksiran Dalam</p><p>Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (Kssr) Di</p><p>Sekolah Kluster. Desertasi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah.</p><p></p><p>Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational High School Teachers'</p><p>Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum. International</p><p>Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33-48. Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia.</p><p></p><p>Richard DLC Gonzales. (2010). Exploring the Conceptual and Psychometric</p><p>Properties of Classroom Assessment Practices Questionnaire: Findings from</p><p>Three Countries. University of Santo Tomas</p><p></p><p>Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language</p><p>and Language Behaviour. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</p><p></p><p>Robert B. Ewen. (2014). An Introduction To Theories of Personality. Psychology Press</p><p>Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017.</p><p></p><p>Robinson-Karpius, S. E. R. (2006). Testing and measurement: A user-friendly guide.</p><p>London: Sage Publications</p><p></p><p>Rohani Abdul Hamid, &Khiruddin Ahmad (2003). Using Performance Data To</p><p>Improve Learning : A Cae Study Of The E-Monitoring Programme Of The</p><p>Terengganu State Education Department. Proceedings of the ELTC ETeMS</p><p>Conference 2003: Managing Curricular Change, 24 December 2003,</p><p>Putrajaya.</p><p></p><p>Rohaya Talib & Mohd Najib Abd Ghafar. (2008). Pembinaan dan pengesahan</p><p>instrumen bagi mengukur tahap literasi pentaksiran guru sekolah menengah di</p><p>Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah 2008, 25-27</p><p>November 2008, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia</p><p></p><p>Rosseni Din. (2014). Pembinaan & Permodelan Sistem Pengajaran. Bangi: Penerbit</p><p>Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Russell, M.K. & Airasian, P.W. (2012). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and</p><p>Applications, (7thEdition). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Sabitha Marican. (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial: pendekatan pragmatik. Batu</p><p>Caves: Edusystem Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics Educational Beliefs and Teaching Practices.</p><p>Unpublished PhD thesis, GriffithUniversity, Brisbane.</p><p></p><p>Sanchez, M. T., & Brisk, M.E. (2004). Teachers assessment practices and</p><p>understandings in bilingual program. NABE Journal of Research and Practice,</p><p>2(1), 1993-208.</p><p></p><p>Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business A skill building approach. (2nd</p><p>Ed). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Sekaran, U. (2003). Research and Markets: Research Methods for Business - A Skill</p><p>Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.</p><p>https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521</p><p></p><p>Sh. Siti Hauzimah Wan Omar, (2018) Pengetahuan, kemahiran, sikap dan masalah guru</p><p>dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran bilik darjah bahasa Melayu di sekolah rendah.</p><p>Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu ; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 9 (1).</p><p>pp. 56-67. ISSN 2180-4842.</p><p></p><p>Shahril @ Charil Marzuki,Zainun Ishak, Lee Pau Wing & Saedah Siraj. (1993).</p><p>Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors</p><p>Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational</p><p>Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.</p><p></p><p>Sheridan, J.C. & Lyndall, G.S. (2001). SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish version 10.0</p><p>For Windows. Singapore. John Wiley & Sons, Australia, Ltd.: 150-55.</p><p></p><p>Spencer, Lyle M. & Signe M. Spencer. (1993). Competence At Work: Models for</p><p>Superior Performance, John Wiley & Sons. Inc, New York.</p><p></p><p>Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA:</p><p>Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Stamp, D. (1987). Evaluation of the formation and stability of student teacher attitudes</p><p>to measurement and evaluation practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,</p><p>Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to</p><p>suc-cess in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324328.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education</p><p>programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18 (1), 23-27.</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An Introduction to student-involved assessment for learning.</p><p>New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1984). The use of performance assessment in the</p><p>classroom. Portland: Northwest regional educational lab.</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R.J., (2002). Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning,</p><p>Knowing What Student Know. In Committee on the Foundation of &</p><p>Information Studies, University of California, Los Angles, USA.</p><p></p><p>Stiggins, R.J., and N. Conklin. (1992). In Teachers Hands: Investigating the Practice</p><p>of Classroom Assessment. Albany NY: SUNY Press.</p><p></p><p>Suah, S. L., & Ong, S. L. (2012). Investigating assessment practices of in-service</p><p>teachers. International online journal of educational science, 4(1), 91-106.</p><p></p><p>Suah, See Ling, Ong Saw Lan & Shuki Osman. (2010). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran</p><p>Pelajar: Amalan Guru-guru di Malaysia. Malaysian Education Deans Council</p><p>Journal, 5, 68-83.</p><p></p><p>Syed Ismail Syed Mustapa dan Ahmad Subki Miskon. (2010). Guru Dan Cabaran</p><p>Semasa. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia.</p><p></p><p>Syed Jaafar Bin Syed Ali. (2014). Kompetensi Guru Dalam Pengajaran Amali</p><p>Teknologi Pembinaan Di Kolej Vokasional. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal dan</p><p>Vokasional: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Syofia Ulah, Zamri Mahamod, Jamaluddin Badusah & Hamidah Yamat. (2012) .</p><p>Amalan komunikasi interpersonal direktif guru Bahasa Indonesia ketika</p><p>memulakan pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu 2: 71-83.</p><p></p><p>Tabachnick, B., G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multiveriate statistics (6th editions).</p><p>USA: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Tallman. R and Bruning. N. (2008). Relating employees psychological contracts to</p><p>their personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(6) 688-712.</p><p></p><p>Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research</p><p>In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and</p><p>learning, New York: Macmillan. p. 127-146.</p><p></p><p>Vlachou, M. A. (2018). Classroom assessment practices in middle school science</p><p>lessons: A study among Greek science teachers. Cogent Education, 5(1).</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455633</p><p></p><p>Warren, E., & Nisbet, S. (1999). The relationship between the purported use of</p><p>assessment techniques and beliefs about the uses of assessment. In J. M. Truran,</p><p>& K. M. Truran (Eds.), 22nd Annual conference of the Mathematics Education</p><p>and Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 22 (pp. 515e521). Adelaide, SA:</p><p>MERGA</p><p></p><p>Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the</p><p>curriculum. In D. Scott (Ed.) Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165-181).</p><p>Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.</p><p></p><p>Yan, Z., & Cheng, C. K. (2015). Primary teachers attitudes, intentions and practices</p><p>regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128-136.</p><p></p><p>Yong, A.G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginners Guide To Factor Analysis: Focusing</p><p>On Explotary Factor Analysis. Tutorials In Quantitative Methods For</p><p>Psychology, 9(2), 7994</p><p></p><p>Yusof Boon dan Mohd Musa Shaharudin. (2011). Kepimpinan Guru besar dalam</p><p>Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) di Sekolah Kebangsaan</p><p>Daerah Kota Tinggi, Johor. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Zakaria. Norsiah & Rahman. (2018).The Influence Of Spiritual Intelligence Towards</p><p>Work-Life Balance Among Teachers. Conference: The 8th National Human</p><p>Resource Management Conference 2018 at: Kedah</p><p></p><p>Zamri Mahamod, Mohamed Amin Embi & Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff. (2010).</p><p>Strategi pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dan Inggeris pelajar cemerlang. Bangi:</p><p>Penerbitan Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Zulelawati Bujang., Yusni Zaini Yusof. (2015). Tret personaliti dan hubungan dengan</p><p>prestasi akademik bakal guru di sebuah institusi latihan perguruan. Jurnal</p><p>BITARA (Khas). vol.8:171-180</p><p></p><p>Zulkifli Awang. (2012). Strategi pengajaran mata pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani yang</p><p>berkesan. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti</p><p>Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p>

Similar Items