Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid Berkeperluan Khas (IPMBK)</p><p>berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tingkatan</p><p>Dua. Asas pembinaan IP-MBK berdasarkan model Kitara...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7351 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7351 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
GV Recreation Leisure |
| spellingShingle |
GV Recreation Leisure Faizal Hakimi Samsudin Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid Berkeperluan Khas (IPMBK)</p><p>berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tingkatan</p><p>Dua. Asas pembinaan IP-MBK berdasarkan model Kitaran PDCA iaitu plan, do, check dan</p><p>act. Reka bentuk kajian kes sekali dijalankan di 11 buah sekolah menengah yang</p><p>menawarkan Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi di daerah Kinta Utara, Perak. Sampel</p><p>kajian seramai 17 orang guru Pendidikan Jasmani dan 65 orang murid berkeperluan khas</p><p>dipilih melalui persampelan rawak bertujuan. Nilai kesahan panel pakar, kebolehpercayaan</p><p>instrumen, objektiviti antara penguji serta kebolehpercayaan item soal selidik adalah pada</p><p>tahap tinggi dan amat baik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan min, sisihan</p><p>piawai dan peratusan. Analisis menggunakan Ujian-t menunjukkan tidak terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid mengikut kategori</p><p>sekolah dan jantina. Keputusan ANOVA sehala menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid bagi permainan bola baling dan ragbi</p><p>sentuh mengikut jenis kurang upaya. Berdasarkan ANOVA dua hala, tiada kesan utama</p><p>dan kesan interaksi terhadap jenis kurang upaya dan jantina bagi permainan bola baling</p><p>dan ragbi sentuh. Analisis korelasi menggunakan kaedah Pearson Product Moment pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang sangat kuat dan signifikan antara pencapaian tahap</p><p>penguasaan murid dalam permainan kategori serangan dan jenis kurang upaya (autisme,</p><p>kurang upaya intelektual, lembam dan disleksia). Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid</p><p>Berkeperluan Khas sesuai digunakan untuk mentaksir pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid</p><p>bagi permainan kategori serangan. Penggunaan IP-MBK sebagai instrumen pentaksiran</p><p>alternatif dapat melahirkan murid yang cergas, sihat, berkemahiran dan berpengetahuan,</p><p>mampu bersosialisasi serta mengamalkan gaya hidup sihat.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Faizal Hakimi Samsudin |
| author_facet |
Faizal Hakimi Samsudin |
| author_sort |
Faizal Hakimi Samsudin |
| title |
Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| title_short |
Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| title_full |
Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| title_fullStr |
Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| title_sort |
pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7351 |
| _version_ |
1747833383650590720 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:73512022-08-24 Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua 2021 Faizal Hakimi Samsudin GV Recreation Leisure <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid Berkeperluan Khas (IPMBK)</p><p>berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tingkatan</p><p>Dua. Asas pembinaan IP-MBK berdasarkan model Kitaran PDCA iaitu plan, do, check dan</p><p>act. Reka bentuk kajian kes sekali dijalankan di 11 buah sekolah menengah yang</p><p>menawarkan Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi di daerah Kinta Utara, Perak. Sampel</p><p>kajian seramai 17 orang guru Pendidikan Jasmani dan 65 orang murid berkeperluan khas</p><p>dipilih melalui persampelan rawak bertujuan. Nilai kesahan panel pakar, kebolehpercayaan</p><p>instrumen, objektiviti antara penguji serta kebolehpercayaan item soal selidik adalah pada</p><p>tahap tinggi dan amat baik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan min, sisihan</p><p>piawai dan peratusan. Analisis menggunakan Ujian-t menunjukkan tidak terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid mengikut kategori</p><p>sekolah dan jantina. Keputusan ANOVA sehala menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid bagi permainan bola baling dan ragbi</p><p>sentuh mengikut jenis kurang upaya. Berdasarkan ANOVA dua hala, tiada kesan utama</p><p>dan kesan interaksi terhadap jenis kurang upaya dan jantina bagi permainan bola baling</p><p>dan ragbi sentuh. Analisis korelasi menggunakan kaedah Pearson Product Moment pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang sangat kuat dan signifikan antara pencapaian tahap</p><p>penguasaan murid dalam permainan kategori serangan dan jenis kurang upaya (autisme,</p><p>kurang upaya intelektual, lembam dan disleksia). Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid</p><p>Berkeperluan Khas sesuai digunakan untuk mentaksir pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid</p><p>bagi permainan kategori serangan. Penggunaan IP-MBK sebagai instrumen pentaksiran</p><p>alternatif dapat melahirkan murid yang cergas, sihat, berkemahiran dan berpengetahuan,</p><p>mampu bersosialisasi serta mengamalkan gaya hidup sihat.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7351 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7351 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan <p>Ab Rahman, Z., Kamal, A. A., Mohd Nor, M. A., & Ab Latif, R. (2020). The effectiveness</p><p>of teaching games for understanding to promote enjoyment in teaching games of</p><p>physical education lesson. Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani, 9(1), 23-32.</p><p>https://doi. org/10.37134/jsspj.vol9.1.4.2020.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Razak Noruzzaman. (2017). Profil penaakulan pelajar berdasarkan permainan</p><p>kategori jaring dan dinding dalam pendidikan jasmani [Tesis Doktor Falsafah].</p><p>Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Abdullah, M., Q. (2018). Gender difference in learning disabled children</p><p>neuropsychological review. research and reviews on healthcare: Open access</p><p>journal, 1(3), 44-48. https://doi.org/ 10.32474/RRHOAJ.2018.01.000111.</p><p></p><p>Abilla, P. (2014). PDCA cycle or PDSA cycle Which is right? https://www. shmula.</p><p>com/pdca-cycle-or-pdsa-cycle-which-is-right/13653/.</p><p></p><p>Abu Bakar Nordin & Bhasah Abu Bakar. (2008). Penaksiran dalam pendidikan & sains</p><p>sosial. Tanjung Malim, Perak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Adams, N. E. (2015). Blooms taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Jounal of the</p><p>medical library association, 103(3), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-</p><p>5050.103.3.010</p><p></p><p>Ahmad Hashim. (2014). Panduan analisis data secara efisien. Selangor. Dubook Press</p><p>Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Algahtani, F. (2017) Teaching students with intellectual disabillities: Contructivism or</p><p>behaviorism? Educational research and reviews, 12(21), 1031-1035.</p><p></p><p>American Society & Quality. (2018, Ogos 6). Learn about quality. http://asq. org/learnabout-</p><p>quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and</p><p>assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy Of educational objectives. New York.</p><p>Longman.</p><p></p><p>Ariel, T. W., Wachen, J., Cannata, M. & Lora, C. V. (2017). Continuous improvement in</p><p>the public school context: Understanding how educators respond to plando</p><p>studyact cycles. Journal of educational change, 18, 465-494. https://doi.org/</p><p>10.1007/s10833-017-9301-4.</p><p></p><p>Arsaythamby, V., Hariharan, N. K. & Ruzlan Md Ali. (2015). Teachers knowledge and</p><p>readiness towards implementation of school based assessment in secondary</p><p>schools. International education studies, 8(11), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.</p><p>5539/ies.v8n11p193.</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Inroduction to research in education. 8thed.</p><p>California. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Atieno, L. (2017, October 18). Why schools should involve students in decision making.</p><p>The New Times. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/221965.</p><p></p><p>Ayu Rahayu. (2018). The analysis of students cognitive ability based on assesments of the</p><p>revised blooms taxonomy on statistic materials. European Journal of</p><p>Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 80-85.</p><p></p><p>Baglama, B. & Demirok, M. (2018). The role of physical education for children with</p><p>special needs: A review study. Near East University Online Journal of Education,</p><p>1(1), 34-41, https://doi.org/10.32955/neuje.v1i1.54.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2015). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah</p><p>pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen</p><p>standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 1. Putrajaya. Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah</p><p>pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen</p><p>standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 2. Putrajaya. Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah</p><p>pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen</p><p>standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 3. Putrajaya. Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik</p><p>darjah. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2019). Panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik</p><p>darjah. Ed. ke-2. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pendidikan Khas. (2015). Buku panduan pengoperasian program pendidikan</p><p>khas integrasi. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pendidikan Khas. (2018). Garis panduan program pendidikan inklusif murid</p><p>berkeperluan khas. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Baker, J.N., Rivera, C.J., Morgan, J.J. & Reese, N. (2015). Teaching algebraic equations</p><p>to middle school students with intellectual disabilities. Academy of Special</p><p>Education Professionals, 29-43.</p><p></p><p>Barba-Martn, R. A., Bores-Garca, D., Hortigela-Alcal, D. & Gonzlez-Calvo, G.</p><p>(2020). The application of the teaching games for understanding in physical</p><p>education. Systematic review of the last six years. International Journal of</p><p>Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 1-16.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330.</p><p></p><p>Barton, E. (2016). Critical issues and promising practices for teaching play to young</p><p>children with disabilities. Handbook of early childhood special education. Basel.</p><p>Springer.</p><p></p><p>Bertills, K., Granlund, M. & Augustine, L. (2019). Inclusive teaching skills and student</p><p>engagement in physical education. Frontiers in Education, 4(74), 1-13.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00074.</p><p></p><p>Bertills, K., Granlund, M., Dahlstrom, O. & Augustine, L. (2018). Relationships between</p><p>physical education (PE) teaching and student self-efficacy, aptitude to participate</p><p>in PE and functional skills: With a special focus on students with disabilities.</p><p>Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Journal, 23(4), 387-401.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1441394.</p><p></p><p>Bhagyalakshmi, H. R. & Seshachalam, D. (2015). Student performance using blooms</p><p>cognition levels: A case study. Journals of Engineering Education Transformation,</p><p>Special Issue 2015, 122-125.</p><p></p><p>Bhasah Abu Bakar. (2007). Kaedah analisis data penyelidikan ilmiah. Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1 cognitive domain. New</p><p>York. Longman.</p><p></p><p>Bunker, D. & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in the secondary</p><p>school. Bulletin of Physical Education, 10, 9-16.</p><p></p><p>Butler, J. & Ovens, A. (2015). TGfU and its governance. ButlerAgora for PE and Sport,</p><p>17(1), 77-92.</p><p></p><p>Bykov, V. Y. & Leshchenko, M. P. (2016). Digital humanistic pedagogy: Relevent</p><p>problems of scientific research in the field of using ICT in education. Information</p><p>Technologies and Learning Tools, 53(3), 1-17.</p><p></p><p>Cetin, E. & Ozdemir, S. (2013). A study on an educational websites usability. Procedia </p><p>Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 683-688.</p><p></p><p>Chiarini, A. (2015, September 1). Effects of ISO 9001 certification on academic processes.</p><p>A first exploratory research from Italy. [Conference presentation abstract]. 18th</p><p>Toulon-Verona (ICQSS) Conference "Excellence in Services", Palermo, Italy.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Shah Alam, Selangor. McGraw-Hill</p><p>(Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decisionmaking</p><p>tasks in education, Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. 5th ed.</p><p>Oxford. Routledge Falmer Publisher.</p><p></p><p>Collins, R. (2013). Authentic assessment: Assessment for learning. Curriculum &</p><p>Leadership Journal, 11(7), 33-37.</p><p></p><p>Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. London. Routledge</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. planning, conducting and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. New Jersey. Pearson Education Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Dawson C. 2002. Practical Research Methods: A User-Friendly Guide to Mastering</p><p>Research. United Kingdom. How To Books.</p><p></p><p>Dicken, K. & Tajul, A., M. (2017). Cabaran pengajaran subjek pendidikan jasmani di</p><p>sekolah menengah di malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies 2017, 2(2), 53-65.</p><p></p><p>Division of Population Health. (2020). Inclusion in school physical education and physical</p><p>activity. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion of</p><p>USA.</p><p></p><p>Doozan, A., & Bae, M. (2016). Teaching physical literacy to promote healthy lives: TGfU</p><p>and related approaches. The Physical Educator, 73(3).</p><p>https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2016-V73-I3-6364.</p><p></p><p>Enero, U. J. & Akangbe, J. M. (2015). Classification of end of chapter questions in senior</p><p>school chemistry textbooks used in Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 19(7), 1-16.</p><p></p><p>Fakhri Abdul Khalil & Mohd Isha Awang. (2016). Isu kesediaan guru dalam amalan</p><p>melaksanakan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. EDUCATUM-Journal of Social</p><p>Science, 2(2016), 1-7.</p><p></p><p>Frost, J. (2020, October 4). Benefits of Welchs ANOVA compared to the classic One-</p><p>Way ANOVA. Today. https://statisticsbyjim.com/anova/welchs-anova-comparedto-</p><p>classic -one-way-anova/.</p><p></p><p>Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L. & Stobart, G. (2008). Changing assessment practice:</p><p>Process, principles and standards. London. Assessment Reform Group.</p><p></p><p>Glen, S. (2019, November 20). Research Variable / Study Variable. Today. https://</p><p>www.statisticshowto.com/research-variable-study/.</p><p></p><p>Grande, T. (2016, April 1). ANOVA with Welch Test in SPSS for unequal sample sizes &</p><p>significant Levene's Test [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=</p><p>o2K4Qa1za0o.</p><p></p><p>Grant, C. & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical</p><p>Framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for house.</p><p>Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research, 12-</p><p>22. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9</p><p></p><p>Greguol, M., Malagodi, B. M. & Carraro, A. (2018). Inclusion of students with disabilities</p><p>in physical education classes: Teachers' attitudes in regular schools. Revista</p><p>Brasileira de Educao Especial, 24(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-</p><p>65382418000100004.</p><p></p><p>Griffin, L. L. & Butler, J. I. (2005). Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research</p><p>and practice. Champaign. Human Kinetics.</p><p></p><p>Gunduz, N. & Hursena, C. (2015). Constructivism in teaching and learning: Content</p><p>analysis evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2015), 526</p><p>533.</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R. & McTighe, J. (2016). Pre-assessment: Promises and cautions. Educational,</p><p>School and Counseling Psychology Faculty Publications, 73(7), 38-43.</p><p></p><p>Haegele, J.A. & Park, S.Y. (2016). Utilizing generalization tactics to promote leisure-time</p><p>physical activity for students with intellectual disabilities. Sport Educators, 29(4),</p><p>19-23.</p><p></p><p>Hasan Md. Zahid & Hossain Md. Sanowar. (2018). Improvement of effectiveness by</p><p>applying PDCA cycle or kaizen: An experimental study on engineering students.</p><p>Journal of Scientific Research, 10(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.</p><p>3329/jsr.v10i2.35638.</p><p></p><p>Hattie, J. (2015). We aren't using assessments correctly: Theres a distinction between</p><p>formative and summative assessments. Education Week Journal, 35(10), 23-28.</p><p></p><p>Hortiguela, D. & Hernando, A. (2017). Teaching games for understanding: A</p><p>comprehensive approach to promote student's motivation in physical</p><p>education. Journal of Human Kinetics, 59, 1727. https://doi.org/10.1515/ hukin-</p><p>2017-0144.</p><p></p><p>Hortiguela, D., Perez-Pueyo, A. & Calderon A. (2016). Effect of the model of teaching on</p><p>physical self-concept of students in physical education. Retos, 2016(30), 76 81.</p><p></p><p>Imms, C., Granlund, M., Wilson, P. H., Steenbergen, B., Rosenbaum, P. L., and Gordon,</p><p>A. M. (2017). Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of</p><p>processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 59, 16</p><p>25. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/dmcn.13237.</p><p></p><p>Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. (2019). Buku panduan pentaksiran edisi 2019.</p><p>Cyberjaya. Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>International Organization for Standardization. (2018). International standard ISO 21001.</p><p>1st ed. ISO 21001:2018(E).</p><p></p><p>International Organization for Standardization. (2021, February 27). ISO today. Today.</p><p>https://www.iso.org/about-us.html.</p><p></p><p>Jabatan Standard Malaysia. (2017). Malaysian standard MS ISO 9001:2015. Sistem</p><p>pengurusan kualiti Keperluan (semakan kedua). Cyberjaya. Kementerian Sains,</p><p>Teknologi dan Inovasi.</p><p></p><p>Julismah Jani & Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali. (2012). Ilmu konten pedagogi dengan</p><p>pelaksanaan pengajaran guru dalam pendidikan jasmani di sekolah menengah</p><p>Malaysia-Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, Mei 2012, 1-13.</p><p></p><p>Kamarul Azmi Jasmi. (2012). Analisis data dalam penyelidikan kualitatif. Kursus</p><p>Penyelidikan. Kualitatif Siri 3. 22-23 Mei. Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus</p><p>Temenggong Ibrahim. 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Kamlasi, I. (2018). Descriptive analyses on english test items based on the application of</p><p>revised Blooms taxonomy. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature,</p><p>and Teaching, 2(2), 203 - 210. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.847.</p><p></p><p>Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. (2010). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kartikowati, R. S. (2013). The technique of plan do check and act to improve trainee</p><p>teachers skills. Canadian Center of Science and Education. 9(12), 268-275.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p268.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2004). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 7/2004:</p><p>Pelaksanaan kurikulum pendidikan khas bermasalah pembelajaran sekolah rendah</p><p>dan sekolah menengah. Kuala Lumpur. Bahagian Sekolah.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012a). Dasar pendidikan kebangsaan. Ed. ke-3. Shah</p><p>Alam. Giga Wise Network Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012b). Laporan awal pelan pembangunan</p><p>pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia</p><p>2013-2025: Pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepas menengah. Putrajaya.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 9/2016:</p><p>Pelaksanaan kurikulum standard sekolah menengah secara berperingkatperingkat</p><p>mulai tahun 2017. Putrajaya. Bahagian Sekolah.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Data pendidikan khas tahun 2018.</p><p>https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/pendidikankhas/buku-data pendidikan -</p><p>khas/1681-buku-data-pendidikan-khas-tahun-2018/file.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b, 5 Mei). Sejarah program. Today.</p><p>https://www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/khas/program-pendidikan-khas-integrasi</p><p>/sejarah.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018c, 5 Mei). Tujuan program. Today. https://</p><p>www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/khas/program-pendidikan-khas-integrasi/ tujuan -</p><p>program.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020a). Data pendidikan khas tahun 2020.</p><p>https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/pendidikankhas/buku-data pendidikan -</p><p>khas/3993-buku-data-pendidikan-khas-tahun-2020/file.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020b, Disember 18). Pengenalan. https://www.</p><p>moe.gov.my/ en/special-education/rancangan-pendidikan-individu/pengenalan.</p><p></p><p>Kincal, R. Y., Yazgan, A. D. & Kartal, O. Y. (2016). The effect of lesson study approach</p><p>upon critical thinking skills development: An investigation into arabic language</p><p>pre-service teachers. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning</p><p>in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2016, 406-414.</p><p></p><p>Lau, X.,C., Wong, Y. L., Wong, J. E., Koh, D., Sedek, R., Jamil, A. T., Ng, A.,L. O.,</p><p>Hazizi, A. S., Ruzita, A. T. & Poh, B. K. (2019). Development and validation of a</p><p>physical activity educational module for overweight and obese adolescents:</p><p>CERGAS programme. International Journal of Environmental Research and</p><p>Public Health, 16(1506), 1-16.</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan pengurusan pentaksiran berasaskan</p><p>sekolah (PBS). Kuala Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Kajian PBS: Kefahaman dan amalan guru. Kuala</p><p>Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2014). Kajian pelaksanaan PBS: Dokumen standard</p><p>prestasi. Kuala Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Lenjani, I. (2015). Contructivism and behaviorism methodologies on special needs</p><p>education. European Journal of Special Education Research, 1(1), 17-24.</p><p></p><p>Lidor, R. & Hutzler, Y. (2019). Including students with disabilities in a physical education</p><p>teacher preparation program: An institutional perspective. Intech Open, Advance</p><p>online publication. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85268.</p><p></p><p>Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantiatif dan kualitatif.</p><p>Selangor. McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Liza Saad. (2017). Pentaksiran pembelajaran kemahiran asas bagi permainan kategori</p><p>serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tahun 4 [Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti</p><p>Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Mclaren, H. (2010). Physical education and physical activity : Opportunities for students</p><p>with a disability. South Australia. Ministerial Advisory Committee.</p><p></p><p>Memmert, D., Almond, L., Bunker, D., Butler, J., Fasold, F., Griffin, L., Hillmann, W.,</p><p>Httermann, S., Klein-Soetebier, T., Knig, S., Nopp, S., Rathschlag, M., Schul,</p><p>K., Schwab, S., Thorpe, R., & Furley, P. (2015). Top 10 research questions related</p><p>to teaching games for understanding. Research quarterly for exercise and sport,</p><p>86(4), 347359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1087294.</p><p></p><p>Miller, D. K. (2006). Measurement by the physical educator. Why and how. 5th ed.</p><p>Dubuque, Iowa. Wm. C. Brown.</p><p></p><p>Mitchell, S., Oslin, J. & Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical</p><p>games approach. 3rd ed. Champaign. Human Kinetics.</p><p></p><p>Moen, R. & Norman, C. (2009). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. https://www.</p><p>researchgate.net/publication/228475044_Evolution_of_the_PDCA_cycle.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan.</p><p>Skudai. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohammad Khatib. (2013). Humanistic education: Concerns, implications and</p><p>applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 45-51. https://</p><p>doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.45-51.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Izwan Shahril, Norkhalid Salimin & Gunathevan Elumalai. (2015). The validity and</p><p>reliability of ISO test towards the performance assessment of future physical</p><p>education teachers in teaching and learning process. Procedia Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 195, 814820. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro. 2015.06.184.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Izwan Shahril, Norkhalid Salimin & Julismah Jani. (2017). Taakulan melalui</p><p>modifikasi permainan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Izwan Shahril. (2017). Keberkesanan instrumen pentaksiran pembelajaran (IPP)</p><p>berasaskan teaching games for understanding (TGfU) bagi permainan badminton</p><p>[Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, Mohd Faizal Nizam</p><p>& Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen. Anda dan</p><p>kepenggunaan. Tanjung Malim, Perak. Emeritus Publications.</p><p></p><p>Movahedazarhouligh & Sara. (2018). Teaching play skills to children with disabilities:</p><p>Research-based interventions and practices. Early Childhood Education Journal.</p><p>https://doi.org/46. 10.1007/s10643-018-0917-7.</p><p></p><p>Muehleck, J. K., Smith, C. L. & Allen, J. M. (2014). Understanding the advising learning</p><p>process using learning taxonomies. NACADA Journal, 34(2), 63-74.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-013.</p><p></p><p>Munafo, C. (2016). The role of the social constructivism in physical education.</p><p>International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4(4), 489-497.</p><p></p><p>Nabiullina, R. K. (2015). The principle of humanism - The fundamental principle of</p><p>inclusive education. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(4), 73-76.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n4p73.</p><p></p><p>Neilson J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. https://www.nngroup.com</p><p>/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/</p><p></p><p>Niekerk, J. & Solms, R. (2017). Using Blooms taxonomy for information security</p><p>education. Information assurance and security education and training, 4(2), 280-</p><p>287.</p><p></p><p>Norazilawati Abdullah, Nik Azmah Nik Yusof & Rosnidar Mansor. (2012). pelaksanaan</p><p>pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam mata pelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains</p><p>dan Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 78-92.</p><p></p><p>Noriati A. Rashid, Boon, P. Y. & Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2012). Murid dan alam</p><p>belajar: Edisi kemas kini. Shah Alam. Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Norkhalid Salimin. (2012). Pentaksiran komprehensif dalam mata pelajaran jasmani</p><p>berdasarkan model K [Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Norman, C. L. (2016, February 10). Evolution Of PDSA and the difference between PDSA</p><p>and PDCA. https://asqaustin.org/wp content/uploads/2015/12/History_</p><p>of_the_PDSA_Cycle_CN_ASQ_Talk_2_10_2016_Handout.pdf.</p><p></p><p>O'Leary, N. (2014). Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding: The</p><p>experiences of a recently qualified teacher. European Physical Education</p><p>Review,20, 367384.</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York. Grossman</p><p>Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Radmehr, F. & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Blooms taxonomy and major theories and</p><p>frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics:</p><p>a comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and</p><p>Technology, 50(6), 895-920, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0020739X.2018.1549336.</p><p></p><p>Rahayu Yuni, Yuliani & Wijaya Bagus. (2018). Implementation of science process skills</p><p>using ICT-based approach to facilitate student life skills. IOP Conference Series:</p><p>Materials Science and Engineering, 296(2018), 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-</p><p>899X/296/1/012035.</p><p></p><p>Rahman, Saemah, Marzuki & Maziah Ahmad. (2017). Applying the humanistic learning</p><p>theory: Effects on the experience and learning pattern related to the prevention of</p><p>child obesity. American Scientific Publishers. 23(2), 1000-1004.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7472.</p><p></p><p>Ravitch, S. M. & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual,</p><p>theoretical and methodological. Los Angeles, U.S.A. SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Rink, J. E. (2002). Teaching physical education for learning. 4th ed. New York. McGraw</p><p>Hill.</p><p></p><p>Rosida. (2013, Ogos 20). Isu-isu pendidikan khas. [Web log post]. https://www.</p><p>slideshare.net/rosidaida9/isu-isu-pendidikan-khas.</p><p></p><p>Ross, P. T & Zaidi, N. L. B. (2019) Limited by our limitations. Perspect Med Educ., 8(4),</p><p>261-264. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40037-019-00530-x</p><p></p><p>Rossett, A. (1987). Techniques in training and performance development series: Training</p><p>needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Educational Technology Publications.</p><p></p><p>Schaeffer, K. (2020). As schools shift to online learning amid pandemic, heres what we</p><p>know about disabled students in the U.S. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact</p><p>tank/2020/04/23/as-schools-shift-to-online-learning-amid-pandemic-hereswhat -</p><p>we-know-about-disabled-students-in-the-u-s/.</p><p></p><p>Sharma, R. M. & Sharma, A. (2016). What students say about homework Views from a</p><p>secondary school science classroom in Trinidad and Tobago. Australian Journal of</p><p>Teacher Education, 41(7), 146-157.</p><p></p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2008). Pembinaan modul. Bagaimana membina</p><p>modul latihan dan modul akademik. Selangor. Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah. (2018). Reka bentuk penyelidikan: Falsafah, teori dan praktis.</p><p>Selangor. Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Slingerland, M., Haerens, L., Cardon, G. & Borghouts, L. (2014). Differences in perceived</p><p>competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball</p><p>game play in middle school physical education. European Physical Education</p><p>Review. 20(1), 2035,</p><p></p><p>Smith, L. D. (2015). Male gender disparity gap: Does gender impact education [Tesis</p><p>Kajian Lanjutan Yang Tidak Diterbitkan]. Sacred Heart University.</p><p></p><p>Smith, T. E. C., Polloway, E., Patton, J. R. & Dowdy, C. A. (2004). Teaching students with</p><p>special needs in inclusive settings. 4th ed.. Boston. Pearson Educational Inc.</p><p></p><p>Sonmez, I. (2017). Association of cognitive, affective, psychomotor and intuitive domains</p><p>in education, Sonmez model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3),</p><p>347-356. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307.</p><p></p><p>Suhono, K. A. S. (2014). Game for children with special needs. Journal of Information</p><p>Systems, 1(2), 18-20. https://doi.org/ 10.24167/sisforma.v1i2.400</p><p></p><p>Syahida Nadia Zakaria. (2015). Kesan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan pendekatan</p><p>tradisional dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran komponen sastera bahasa melayu.</p><p>Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 12-21.</p><p></p><p>Tabrizi, S. & Rideout, G. (2017). Active learning: Using Bloom's taxonomy to support</p><p>critical pedagogy. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in</p><p>Education, 8(3), 3202-3209.</p><p></p><p>Tant, M. & Watelain, E. (2016). Forty years later, a systematic literature review on</p><p>inclusion in physical education (1975-2015): a teacher perspective. Educ. Res.</p><p>Rev. 19, 117. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.002.</p><p></p><p>Thomas, J. R. & Nelson, J. K. (2001). Research methods in physical activity. 4th ed.</p><p>Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics.</p><p></p><p>Topolovcan, T. (2016). Art-based research of constructivist teaching. Croatian Journal of</p><p>Education, 28(4), 1141-1172. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v18i4.2074.</p><p></p><p>UKEssays. (2018, November 22). Strengths and weaknesses of the teaching games for</p><p>understanding model.https://www.ukessays.com/essays /teaching /strengths-andweak</p><p>nesses-of-the-teaching-games-for-understanding-model.php ?vref=1.</p><p></p><p>Unit Pendidikan Khas. (2018). Senarai maklumat sekolah. Ipoh, Perak. Jabatan Pendidikan</p><p>Negeri.</p><p></p><p>Usher, W., Edwards, A. & Meyrick, B. (2015). Utilizing educational theoretical Models to</p><p>support effective physical education pedagogy. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-10.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1094847.</p><p></p><p>Vinz, S. (2020, October 22). Developing your theoretical framework. [Web log post].</p><p>https:// www.scribbr.com/dissertation/theoretical-framework/.</p><p></p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>Wang, L., Wang, M. & Wen, H. (2015). Teaching practice of physical education teachers</p><p>for students with special needs: An application of the theory of planned behaviour.</p><p>International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62, 590-607.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1077931.</p><p></p><p>Wang, M. & Wang, L. (2018). Teaching games for understanding intervention to promote</p><p>physical activity among secondary school students. BioMed Research</p><p>International, 2018, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3737595.</p><p></p><p>Warta Kerajaan Persekutuan. (2013). Peraturan-peraturan pendidikan (pendidikan khas)</p><p>2013. Kuala Lumpur. Jabatan Peguam Negara.</p><p></p><p>Way, T. K. (2017). Using teaching cases for achieving Bloom s highorder cognitive levels:</p><p>An application in technically oriented information systems course. Presented</p><p>SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research.</p><p>10 Disember. Singapore.</p><p></p><p>Willis, I. & Prescott, D. (November, 2015). Semi-structured interviews for educational</p><p>research. https://www.slideshare.net/tundeva/semistructured-interviews-foreducational-</p><p>research.</p><p></p> |