Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems

Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems

<p>This study aims to develop and determine the effectiveness of the Fraction Slider in improving the</p><p>performance of Year 5 students in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) addition and</p><p>subtraction of fraction w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lavina Nair Madawan Nair
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2021
Subjects:
QA Mathematics
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7642
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7642
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Lavina Nair Madawan Nair
Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
description <p>This study aims to develop and determine the effectiveness of the Fraction Slider in improving the</p><p>performance of Year 5 students in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) addition and</p><p>subtraction of fraction word problems. This study also aims to determine the effective problem</p><p>solving strategy using the Fraction Slider. This study employed the design and development</p><p>research (DDR) with a combination of quantitative and qualitative approach. In this study, DDR</p><p>is limited to two phases; (1) Design and Development and (2) Evaluation. The first phase involved</p><p>design and development of Fraction Slider using ADDIE Model. Three panel of experts were involved</p><p>to validate the Fraction Slider using the expert opinion questionnaire. The percentage of experts</p><p>agreement obtained was 87.9%. For the aspect of reliability, the Fraction Slider was used in</p><p>teaching and learning for 27 students. Analysis of Cronbach alpha coefficient was calculated and</p><p>obtained 0.82. The second phase employed a quasi- experimental design. It consists of 23 students</p><p>for the control group and 25 students for the treatment group. The quantitative data was collected</p><p>through pre-test and post-test. The study used Mann-Whitney test to show the significant difference</p><p>between groups. The result showed that there is no differences between the control and treatment</p><p>group in pre-test scores. There is a significant difference in the post- test between the two</p><p>groups. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare the two related samples. This study revealed</p><p>that there is no significant differences between the pre and post-test scores in solving the</p><p>addition and subtraction of fractions in the control group. Next, there is a significant difference</p><p>before and after being taught using the Fraction Slider for the treatment group. Qualitative</p><p>descriptive research method was used to identify the problem solving strategy used by the students</p><p>in solving word problems using the Fraction Slider. Qualitative data was collected via script</p><p>analysis and task based interview. This study identified the Fraction Slider strategy to solve word</p><p>problems effectively which was built upon existing idea of Polyas Model. In conclusion, the use of</p><p>Fraction Slider strategy in teaching and learning HOTS Fraction word problem solving can</p><p>significantly improve students performance. Accordingly, the Fraction Slider strategy is expected</p><p>to assist teachers in enhancing the effectiveness of teaching and learning of word problems and</p><p>help the students to acquire word problem solving skills.</p><p></p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Lavina Nair Madawan Nair
author_facet Lavina Nair Madawan Nair
author_sort Lavina Nair Madawan Nair
title Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
title_short Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
title_full Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
title_fullStr Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
title_full_unstemmed Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
title_sort development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7642
_version_ 1776104527122923520
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:76422022-11-07 Development and the effectiveness of using fraction slider in solving higher order thinking skills word problems 2021 Lavina Nair Madawan Nair QA Mathematics <p>This study aims to develop and determine the effectiveness of the Fraction Slider in improving the</p><p>performance of Year 5 students in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) addition and</p><p>subtraction of fraction word problems. This study also aims to determine the effective problem</p><p>solving strategy using the Fraction Slider. This study employed the design and development</p><p>research (DDR) with a combination of quantitative and qualitative approach. In this study, DDR</p><p>is limited to two phases; (1) Design and Development and (2) Evaluation. The first phase involved</p><p>design and development of Fraction Slider using ADDIE Model. Three panel of experts were involved</p><p>to validate the Fraction Slider using the expert opinion questionnaire. The percentage of experts</p><p>agreement obtained was 87.9%. For the aspect of reliability, the Fraction Slider was used in</p><p>teaching and learning for 27 students. Analysis of Cronbach alpha coefficient was calculated and</p><p>obtained 0.82. The second phase employed a quasi- experimental design. It consists of 23 students</p><p>for the control group and 25 students for the treatment group. The quantitative data was collected</p><p>through pre-test and post-test. The study used Mann-Whitney test to show the significant difference</p><p>between groups. The result showed that there is no differences between the control and treatment</p><p>group in pre-test scores. There is a significant difference in the post- test between the two</p><p>groups. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare the two related samples. This study revealed</p><p>that there is no significant differences between the pre and post-test scores in solving the</p><p>addition and subtraction of fractions in the control group. Next, there is a significant difference</p><p>before and after being taught using the Fraction Slider for the treatment group. Qualitative</p><p>descriptive research method was used to identify the problem solving strategy used by the students</p><p>in solving word problems using the Fraction Slider. Qualitative data was collected via script</p><p>analysis and task based interview. This study identified the Fraction Slider strategy to solve word</p><p>problems effectively which was built upon existing idea of Polyas Model. In conclusion, the use of</p><p>Fraction Slider strategy in teaching and learning HOTS Fraction word problem solving can</p><p>significantly improve students performance. Accordingly, the Fraction Slider strategy is expected</p><p>to assist teachers in enhancing the effectiveness of teaching and learning of word problems and</p><p>help the students to acquire word problem solving skills.</p><p></p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7642 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7642 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abd Wahid & Mohammad Faizal Naharuddin. (2010). Pembangunan Perisian Multimedia Interaktif</p><p>Teknologi Automotif: Anti-Lock Brake System (ABS).</p><p>Johor: UTM.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Halim Abdullah, Nur Liyana Zainal Abidin & Marlina Ali. (2015). Analysis of students errors</p><p>in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social</p><p>Science, 11(21), 133142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133</p><p></p><p>Abdul Halim Abdullah, Mahani Mokhtar, Noor Dayana Abd Halim, Dayana Farzeeha Ali, Lokman Mohd Tahir</p><p>& Umar Haiyat Abdul Kohar. (2017). Mathematics Teachers Levelof Knowledge and Practice on the</p><p>Implementation of Higher- Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and</p><p>Technology Education, 13(1), 3-17.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Halim Abdullah, Mahani Mokhtar, Chieng, C. K., Marlina Ali, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim & Johari</p><p>Surif. (2016, May). Factors preventing Malaysian teachers from using Information and Communication</p><p>Technology (ICT) in teaching mathematics. IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering</p><p>Education. doi:10.1109/ICoICT.2016.7571874.</p><p></p><p>Abu Bakar Nordin. (2013). Kurikulum Ke arah Penghasilan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis, Kreatif dan</p><p>Inovatif. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik,1, 10-18.</p><p></p><p>Ahmad Jamaluddin. (2015). Modul Motivasi Diri. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Aksoy, N.,C. & Yazlik, D.,C. (2017). Student Errors in Fractions and</p><p>Possible Causes of These Errors. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 219-233.</p><p>doi:10.11114/jets.v5i11.2679.</p><p></p><p>Aliza Ali. (2016). Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan modul berasaskan bermain bagi pembelajaran</p><p>kemahiran bahasa Melayu kanak-kanak prasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(1), 16-29.</p><p></p><p>Ambreen Ahmed & Nawaz Ahmad. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Rote Learning on High and Low</p><p>Achievers in Graduate and Undergraduate Programs. Journal of Education and Educational Development,</p><p>4, 111-129.</p><p>10.22555/joeed.v4i1.982.</p><p></p><p>Apino, E & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing Instructional Design to Improve Mathematical Higher</p><p>Order Thinking Skills of Students. Journal of Physics:</p><p>Conference Series, 9(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Sorensen, C.K. & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research</p><p>in education (9th Ed). London: Wadsworth.</p><p></p><p>Azurah Mohd Johar & Effandi Zakaria. (2015). Analisis Kesilapan Bagi Tajuk Pecahan Dalam Kalangan</p><p>Murid Tahun Empat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(2), 1-17.</p><p></p><p>Azrul Azwan Mohd Abdul Aziz. (2017). Penggunaan Kaedah Model Bar Dalam Menbantu Murid Tahun 5</p><p>Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Berbentuk KBAT. Public Achievement Towards Higher Order</p><p>Thinking Skill Mathematics Questions With Bar Model Method. Sci. Int. (Lahore), 29(4), 733736.</p><p></p><p>Azrul Azwan Mohd Abdul Aziz, Marzita Puteh, Norain Mohd Tajudin, & Mazlini, Adnan. (2017). Pupils</p><p>Achievement Towards Higher Order Thnking Skill Mathematics Questions with Bar Model Method. Science</p><p>International, 29, 733- 736.</p><p></p><p>Baharuddin Aris, Rio Sumarni, Manimegalai Subramaniam, Noor Azean Atan, Shaharuddin Md. Salleh,</p><p>Norasyikin Mohd Said, & Zaleha Abdullah. (2008). How to Design Multimedia Web Applications: Theory</p><p>Into Practice. Selangor: Venton Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. (2012). Critical thinking: A students</p><p>introduction (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Beckman, S. (2004). Solving algebra and other story problems with simple diagrams: A method</p><p>demonstrated in grade 46 texts used in Singapore. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 4246</p><p></p><p>Bentley, B. & Bosse, M. J. (2018). College students understanding of fraction operations.</p><p>International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 233-247.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3881</p><p></p><p>Berends, I. E. & Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic</p><p>problem solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 345-353.</p><p></p><p>Berinderjeet Kaur. (2015, June). The model method: A tool for representing and visualising</p><p>relationships. Conference proceedings of ICMI Study 23: Primary mathematics study on whole numbers.</p><p>Retrieved from http://www.umac.mo/fed/ICMI23/doc/Proceedings_ICMI_STUDY_23_final.pdf</p><p></p><p>Berinderjeet Kaur. (2018). The Why, What and How of the 'Model' Method: A Tool for Representing and</p><p>Visualising Relationships When Solving Whole Number Arithmetic Word Problems. The International</p><p>Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1000-y</p><p></p><p>Beyer, B. (1988). Developing a thinking skills program. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist Approach to Learning - An Effective Approach of Teaching</p><p>Learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies</p><p>(IRJIMS), 1(6), 65-74.</p><p></p><p>Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Braithwaite, D. W., Pyke, A. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2017). A computational model of fraction</p><p>arithmetic. Psychological Review, 124(5), 603-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000072</p><p></p><p>Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-regulation and Other More Mysterious</p><p>Mechanisms. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.</p><p></p><p>Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. London: Havard University Pres.Cambridge.</p><p></p><p>Burns, M. & Silbey, R. (2000). So you have to teach math? Sound advice for K-6 teachers. Sausalito,</p><p>CA: Math Solutions Publications.</p><p></p><p>Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A. &</p><p>Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, effectiveness and applications.</p><p>Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model</p><p></p><p>Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.</p><p>Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040950</p><p></p><p>Cecil Hiltrimartin. (2016). Analisis konsepsi dan amalan pengajaran guru terhadap penyelesaian</p><p>masalah matematik di sekolah menengah atas, Palembang (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).</p><p>Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.</p><p></p><p>Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H., Tsai, C. C. and Lee W. T. L. (2011). Modelling Primary School</p><p>Pre-ServiceTeachers Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Meaningful Learning</p><p>with Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Computers and Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.</p><p></p><p>Clark, A. (2007). Singapore Math : A Visual Approach to Word Problems. Math in Focus: Singapore</p><p>Math by Marshall Cavendish, 18. Retrieved from hmheducation.com/singaporemath</p><p></p><p>Clark, A. (2009). Problem solving in Singapore Math. Math in Focus: A Singapore Approach. Retrieved</p><p>from http://www.scribd.com/doc/36990278/Math-in-</p><p>Focus-Problem-Solving by-Andy-Clark.</p><p></p><p>Clar , A. (2010). Singapore Math: A visual approach to word problems. Marshall</p><p>Cavendish Education: Singapore.</p><p></p><p>Clements, M. A. (1980). Analysing children's errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational</p><p>Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 1-21.</p><p></p><p>Clements, M. A. & Ellerton, N. (1996). The Newman Procedure for Analysing Errors on Written</p><p>Mathematical Tasks. Retrieved from</p><p>http://users. tpg.com.au /arnold10/PAGES/newman.htm</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L. (1992). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Cope, L. (2015). Math manipulatives: Making the abstract tangible. Delta Journal of Education,</p><p>5(1), 10-19.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches.</p><p>(3 ed.). New York: SAGE Publication, Ins.</p><p></p><p>Csikos, C., Szitanyi, J. & Kelemen, R. (2011). The effects of using drawings in developing young</p><p>childrens mathematical word problem solving: A design experiment with third grade Hungarian</p><p>students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 47-65. doi:10.1007/s10649-001-9360-z</p><p></p><p>Dagar, V. & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Arts Social</p><p>Sciences Journal, 7(4).</p><p></p><p>Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Dryden Press.</p><p></p><p>Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts.</p><p>Applied Nursing Research, 5(4):1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0897- 1897(05)80008-4</p><p></p><p>Debrenti, E. (2015). Visual representation in mathematics teaching: an experiment with student.</p><p>Acta didactica Napocensia, 8(1), 19-26</p><p></p><p>Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide for small-scale social research projects. New York:</p><p>Mc GrawHill Education.</p><p></p><p>Dela, C. J. K. & Lapinid, M. R. (2014). Students' Difficulties in Translating Worded Problems into</p><p>Mathematical Symbols. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/conferences/dlsu_research_congress/2014/_pdf/proceedi ngs/LLI-I-009-FT.pdf</p><p></p><p>Deringol, Y. (2019). Misconceptions of primary school students about the subject of fractions:</p><p>views of primary teachers and primary pre-service teachers. International Journal of</p><p>Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.16290</p><p></p><p>Dick, W. & Carey, L. (2006). The Systematic Design Of Instruction (4th Ed.). New</p><p>York: Haper Collins College Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Dixon, J., Andreasen, J., Avila, C., Bawatneh, Z., Deichert, D., Howse, T., & Turner, M.(2014).</p><p>Redefining the whole: Common Errors in Elementary Preservice Teachers' Self-Authored Word Problems</p><p>for Fraction Subtraction. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Patricia_Moyer-</p><p>Packenham/publication/268445276_Second_graders_mathematical_practices_fo</p><p>r_solving_fraction_tasks/links/5480f0350cf20f081e726b81.pdf#page=3</p><p></p><p>Donny Chindang & Siti Mistima Maat. (2017). Aplikasi Analisis Kesilapan Newman Dalam Penyelesaian</p><p>Masalah Matematik Berayat Murid Tahun 4. E- Prosiding Simposium Pendidikan Diperibadikan</p><p>(Personalized Education) - Siri 1, 536- 543.</p><p></p><p>Drost, E. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and</p><p>Perspectives, 38, 105-124.</p><p></p><p>Edy Surya, Jozua Sabandarm, Yaya S. Kusumah & Darhim. (2013). Improving of junior high school</p><p>visual thinking representation ability in mathematical problem solving by CTL. Indonesian</p><p>Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 113-126.</p><p></p><p>Effandi Zakaria & Siti Mistima. (2010). Analysis of Students Error in Learning of Quadratic</p><p>Equations. International Education Studies, 3 (3), 105.</p><p>http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p105</p><p></p><p>England, L. (2010). Raise the bar on problem solving. Teaching Children, 17(3),156-</p><p>163. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ902167</p><p></p><p>Enu, J. & Agyman, O. & Nkum, D. (2015). Factors influencing Students' Mathematics Performance in</p><p>some selected Colleges of Education in Ghana, 3, 68-74.</p><p></p><p>Fadzilah Abdol Razaka, Noordin Noordin, Rohana Alias & Rohana Dollah. (2012).</p><p>How Do 13-year Olds in Malaysia Compare Fractions? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42,</p><p>100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.171</p><p></p><p>Faezah Abd. Ghani, & Mazlan Aris. (2012). Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul</p><p>Kemahiran. Jurnal Teknologi, 58, 4550.</p><p></p><p>Farizan Ismail. (2014). Keberkesanan Kaedah Model Bar dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik berayat</p><p>(Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor.</p><p></p><p>Fazio, L. & Siegler, R. (2011). Teaching fractions. Retrieved from</p><p>http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/ 002127/212781e.pdf</p><p></p><p>Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Era of</p><p>Cognitive - Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.</p><p></p><p>Fong, H. K. (2009). The Underpinning Concept, 13. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.hmhco.com/~/media/sites/home/education/global/pdf/white-</p><p>papers/mathematics/elementary/math-infocus/mif_underpinning_concept_lr.pdf Frederick, M. L.,</p><p>Courtney, S. & Caniglia, J. (2014). With a little help from my friends: Scaffolding techniques in</p><p>problem solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2): 21-32.</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th ed.).</p><p>New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Frederick, M., Courtney, S. & Caniglia, J. (2014). With a Little Help from My Friends: Scaffolding</p><p>Techniques in Problem Solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 7. 21-32.</p><p>10.1080/24727466.2014.11790340.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M. (2014). Teacher Development and Educational Change. Retrieved from</p><p>https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870700</p><p></p><p>Fung, W., Orosco, M. J. & Swanson, H. L. (2014). Influence of Reading and Calculation on Children</p><p>at Risk and not at Risk for Word Problem Solving: Is Math Motivation a Mediator? Learning and</p><p>Individual Differences, 36, 8491. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.011</p><p></p><p>Gabriel, F., Coche, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view</p><p>of childrens difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 715. Retrieved from</p><p>https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013. 00715</p><p></p><p>Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th ed.).</p><p>New York: CBS College Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Galadima, I. and Yushau, M. A. (2007). An Investigation into Mathematics Performance of Senior</p><p>Secondary School Students in Sokoto State. ABACUS, 32(1), 24 33.</p><p></p><p>Gningue, S. M., Park, B., West, B., & Fuchs, E. (2014). Applying Bruners Theory of Representation</p><p>to Teach Pre-Algebra and Algebra Concepts to Community College Students Using Virtual</p><p>Manipulatives. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 8(3), 159.178.</p><p></p><p>Goh, S. P. (2009). Primary 5 pupils difficulties in using the model method for solving complex</p><p>relational word problems (Unpublished master's dissertation). National Institute of Education,</p><p>Singapore.</p><p></p><p>Golafshani, N. (2013) Teachers beliefs and teaching mathematics with manipulatives.</p><p>Canadian Journal for Education, 36(3), 137-159.</p><p></p><p>Gooding, S. (2009). Children's difficulties with mathematical word problems.</p><p>Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,</p><p>29(3).</p><p></p><p>Gray E. (2004). Doing research in real world (1St ed.). London: SAGE</p><p>Publications.</p><p>Gregory, R. J. (2015). Psychological Testing History, Principles and Applications.</p><p>United States: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p></p><p>Hamza Calisici. (2018). Learning Difficulties in the Ratio-proportion Topic and a Suggested</p><p>Solution: Envelope Technique. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6 (8): 1848-1855. Retrieved</p><p>from doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060830</p><p></p><p>Har,Y.B. (2010). Bar Modelling. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Education.</p><p></p><p>Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New</p><p>York: Teachers College Press.</p><p></p><p>Hartini Hashim, Mohd Norawi Ali & Mohd Ali Shamsudin. (2017). Infusing High Order Thinking Skills</p><p>(HOTs) through Thinking Based Learning (TBL) during ECA to enhance studentsinterest in STEM.</p><p>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(11), 1191-1199.</p><p></p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smalindino, S. E. (1996). Instructional Media And</p><p>Technologies For Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Ho, S. Y. & Lowrie, T. (2014). The model method: Students' performance and its effectiveness.</p><p>Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 87-100.</p><p></p><p>Hofer, C. (2015). The introduction of the Singapore Bar Model in Year 1 Problem solving: A Personal</p><p>Reflection. The STeP Journal Student Teacher Perspectives, 2(2), 107-117.</p><p></p><p>Hoong, L. W., Kin, H. W. & Pien, C. W. (2015) Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract: surveying its origins</p><p>and charting its future. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 1- 19.</p><p></p><p>Hoven, J. & Garelick, B. (2007). Singapore Math: Simple or complex? Educational Leadership,65(3),</p><p>28-31</p><p></p><p>Hurrell, D. (2013). Effectiveness of Teacher Professional Learning: Enhancing the Teaching of</p><p>Fractions in Primary Schools. Thesis: Individual Retirement Savings Behavior: Evidence from</p><p>Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/307381</p><p></p><p>Ismail Raduan. (2010). Error analysis and the corresponding cognitive activities committed by year</p><p>five primary students in solving mathematical word problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral</p><p>Sciences. 2(2), 3836-3838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.600.</p><p></p><p>Istiandaru, A., Istihapsari, V., Wardono, & Mulyono. (2015). Problem based learning (PBL) dengan</p><p>pendekatan realistik-saintifik dan asesmen PISA untuk</p><p>meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika. Edumatica, 5(1), 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Jabatan Pendidikan Perak. (2015). Analisis 2014 Negeri Perak. Retrived from</p><p>https://fdokumen.site/document/analisis-2014-upsr-perak-2015-1505-7529-216-</p><p>status-upsr-negeri-perak-sasaran.html</p><p></p><p>Jamalludin Harun & Zaidatun Tasir. (2003). Multimedia Dalam Pendidikan. Bentong: PTS Publications &</p><p>Distributors.</p><p></p><p>Jamilah Yusof & Juliana Langkan. (2016). Word Problems Involving Fractions: A Case of Year 5 Pupils</p><p>in Brunei Darussalam. Retrieved from</p><p>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1372/2d38f2cf648d70e4adc4be92be258a1a4813. pdf</p><p></p><p>Jamilah Yusof & Sarimah Lusin. (2013). The Role of Manipulatives in Enhancing Pupils</p><p>Understanding on Fraction Concepts. International Journal for Infonomics (IJI), Volume 6(3),</p><p>750-755. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a742/c506df50a81ae553e2140f51a39e204355d3. pdf</p><p></p><p>Jan, S. & Rodrigues, S. (2012). Model drawing strategy: A tool to link abstract words to real life.</p><p>International Researcher, 1(4), 137148.</p><p></p><p>Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti. (2014). Laporan Tahunan Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti Tahun</p><p>2013. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Deatline-Buchman, A. & Sczesniak, E. (2007). Mathematical word</p><p>problem solving in third-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 283302.</p><p>doi:10.3200/JOER.100.5.283-302</p><p></p><p>Juppri Bacotang, Zainiah Mohamed Isa, Mazlina Che Mustafa, Mahzan Arshad & Ainon Omar. (2016).</p><p>Aplikasi Model Addie Dalam Pembangunan Modul Literasi Awal (Modul Lit-a) Untuk Awal Kanak-Kanak.</p><p>JPBU Edisi Khas, 110.</p><p></p><p>Johar Rahmah, Patahuddin Sitti, & Widjaja Wanty. (2017). Linking pre-service teachers "questioning</p><p>and students" strategies in solving contextual problems: A case study in Indonesia. The Mathematics</p><p>Enthusiast 14(1), 101-128.</p><p></p><p>Kamaleswaran Jayarajah. (2017). The development of a year five children's engineering teaching</p><p>module for HOTS (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Kamaleswaran Jayarajah, Rohaida Mohd Saat & Rose Amnah Abd Rauf. (2014). A Review of Science,</p><p>Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999-2013: A Malaysian</p><p>Perspective. Eurasia Journal of M thematics, Science and Technology Education, 10, 155-163.</p><p>10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a.</p><p></p><p>Karami, M., Pakmehr, H. & Aghili, A. (2012). Another View to Importance of Teaching Methods in</p><p>Curriculum: Collaborative Learning and Students Critical Thinking Disposition. Procedia - Social</p><p>and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3266 3270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.048</p><p></p><p>Karrison, J. & Carroll, M. K. (1991). Solving Word Problems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23 (4),</p><p>5556. Retrieved from</p><p>http://proxy.library.vcu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/63020</p><p>631?accountid=14780%5Cnhttp://vcu-alma-</p><p>primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/VCU/vcu_services_page?url_ver=Z39.8</p><p>8-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&s</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun</p><p>5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 4 SK. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa</p><p>dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 3 Jilid 2 SK. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik</p><p>Tahun 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Khairul Anuar Abdul Rahman & Norazrena Abu Samah. (2011). Perisian Matematik bagi Tajuk Pecahan</p><p>untuk Pelajar Berkeperluan Khas. JurnalTeknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, 1(2), 3947.</p><p></p><p>Kho, T. H. (1987). Mathematical models for solving arithmetic problems. Proceedings of</p><p>Fourth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematical Education, 345-351, Singapore: Institute of</p><p>Education.</p><p></p><p>King, F. J., Goodson. F., & Rohani. F. (2012). Higher Order Thinking Skills.</p><p>Tallahassee: Florida State University</p><p></p><p>Kim, E. S. & Willson, V. L. (2010). Pretest sensitization. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Kocaoglu, Y. (2010). 5th grade students mistakes and misconceptions in solving problems about</p><p>fractions. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 14, 71-85.</p><p></p><p>Korb, K. A. (2012). Adopting and Adapiting an Insrument. Retrieved from</p><p>http://korbedpsych.com/R09aAdopt.html</p><p></p><p>Kribbs, E. E. & Rogowsky, B. A. (2016). A review of the effects of visual-spatial representations</p><p>and heuristics on word problem solving in middle school mathematics. International Journal of</p><p>Research in Eduaction and Science, 2(1),</p><p>65-74</p><p></p><p>Krongthong Khairiree.(2012). Enhancing Students Understanding in Word</p><p>Problems Through Bar Model Strategy. Retrieved from</p><p>https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2019/invited/4382019_21756.pdf</p><p></p><p>Krulik, S. & Rudnik, J.A. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in</p><p>elementary school. Boston: Temple University.</p><p></p><p>Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: A Bridge between Cognitive Psychology and Educational</p><p>Practice. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 268-273. Retrieved December 24, 2020, from</p><p>http://www.jstor.org/stable/3701534</p><p></p><p>Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design.</p><p>Oxon: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Laski, E. V., Jordan, J. R., Daoust, C. & Murray, A K. (2015). What Makes Mathematics</p><p>Manipulatives Effective? Lessons From Cognitive Science and Montessori Education. SAGE Open, 1- 8.</p><p>DOI: 10.1177/2158244015589588</p><p></p><p>Lee, E. & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A Design Framework for Enhancing Engagement in Student-centered</p><p>Learning: Own It, Learn It, and Share It.</p><p>Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 707-734.</p><p></p><p>Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics, use and</p><p>interpretation (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Leh, M. J., Jitendra, A. K., Caskie, G. I. L. & Griffin, C.C. (2009). An evaluation</p><p>ofcurriculum-based measurement of mathematics word problem solvingmeasures for monitoring</p><p>third-grade students mathematics competence. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 90-99.</p><p></p><p>Leong,Y. H. & Ho, W. K. (2015). Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 119.</p><p></p><p>Liew, K. K, Sian, H. T., Siti Syardia Erdina Mohamed & Parmjit Singh.</p><p>Parmjit. (2019). Learning to Make Sense of Fractions: Some Insights from the Malaysian Primary 4</p><p>Pupils. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14. Retrieved from</p><p>10.29333/iejme/3985.</p><p></p><p>Linda Vitoria, Fauzi and Nadia Ananda (2017). Students Performance in Solving Problems Involving</p><p>Fractions. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/AICS- Social/article/view/10833/8727</p><p></p><p>Lopez, L. (2008). Helping At-risk Students Solve Mathematical Word Problems Through The Use Of</p><p>Direct Instruction And Problem Solving Strategies (Master's thesis, University of Central Florida,</p><p>Florida, United States. Retrieved</p><p>from https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3668</p><p></p><p>Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantication of content validity. Nursing</p><p>Research, 35(6), 381385.</p><p></p><p>MacDonald, L. R. & Banes, L. C. (2017). More than words: Struggling reader's comprehension of word</p><p>problems. Journal of Teacher Action Research, 3 (3), 24-39.</p><p>http://www.practicalteacherresearch.com/uploads/5/6/2/4/56249715/more_than_ words.pdf</p><p></p><p>Madani, N. A. Tengah, K. A. & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2018). Using bar model to solve word problems on</p><p>profit, loss and discount. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1097, 1-9.doi</p><p>:10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012103</p><p></p><p>Magliaro, S. G. & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Student Models of Instructional Design. Educational</p><p>Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 83</p><p>106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-6498-y</p><p></p><p>Mahalectchumy Kumarasamy. (2019). Penggunaan Kaedah Buck dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berayat</p><p>Matematik. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4 (31), 56-66</p><p></p><p>Maher, C. A. & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education.</p><p>Netherlands: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Mahoney, K. (2012). Effects of Singapore's model method on elementary student problem solving</p><p>performance: Single case research (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston,</p><p>United States). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002962</p><p></p><p>Maimunah Abdul Ghani, Khairul Amilin Tengah & Hardimah Said. (2019). Bar Model as Intervention</p><p>in Solving Word Problem Involving Percentage. International Journal on Emerging</p><p>Mathematics Education, 3(1). 10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.11093.</p><p></p><p>Mariam Ahmad Maulana & Nor'ashiqin Mohd Idrus. (2013). Metacognitive</p><p>Strategies In Quadratic Equation Word Problem. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 3 (2).</p><p></p><p>Marin, K. (2015). Developing the mathematical quality of instruction: MQI as a tool for</p><p>professional development (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses</p><p>Global. (UMI: No. 3689520)</p><p></p><p>Marzita Puteh, Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan & Azrul Azwan Mohd Abdul Aziz. (2017). The</p><p>Utilization of Bar Model Method in Year 5 Mathematics Learning Based on HOTS. International Journal</p><p>of Advanced Biotechnology and Research (IJBR), 8(3),56-63. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322203128</p><p></p><p>Maslinah Lasiun. (2016). Keberkesanan Kaedah Visualisasi: Meningkatkan Keupayaan</p><p>Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Berayat. Proceeding of ICECRS, 1, 1-11.</p><p></p><p>May Nisa Istiqomah and Sufyani Prabawanto. (2019). The difficulties of fifth grade students in</p><p>solving mathematics fraction word problems. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Basic Of Education, 3(2),152-160.</p><p></p><p>Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Najah Mohd Nawi & Suhaini</p><p>Ismail. (2017). Perceptions of Mathematics Teachers in Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Kuala</p><p>Langat District Secondary School. The Social Science, 12(11), 1963-1965.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2017.1963.1965</p><p></p><p>Md. Noor Saper, Nurul Ain Mohd Daud & Norazani Ahmad. (2016). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan Modul</p><p>I-Sc (Islamic Spiritual Counseling) ke atas pelajar bermasalah tingkah laku. International Journal</p><p>of Islamic Thought, 9(6), 32-43.</p><p></p><p>Megat Aman Zahiri & Nurul Shuhadah Abdul Rahman. (2010). Pembangunan Pembelajaran Berbantukan</p><p>Komputer (PBK) Bagi Topik Bulatan Matematik Tingkatan 2 Berasaskan Teori Konstruktivisme. Skudai,</p><p>Johor: UTM</p><p></p><p>Meter, V.P., Aleksic, M., Scwartz, A. & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy</p><p>for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31,142-166.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001</p><p></p><p>Metin, M., Coskun, K., Birisci, S. & Yilmaz, G. K. (2016). Opinions of prospective teachers about</p><p>utilizing the 5E instructional model. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and</p><p>Educational Studies, 3(4), 411- 422.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education, 27 (1), 1268.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education. (2017). Annual Report 2016 Malaysia Education BluePrint 2013-2025.</p><p>Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras</p><p>Tinggi dalam Sains dan Matematik (HOTsSM). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education</p><p></p><p>Mohammad Ahmad. (2018). The effect of teaching mathematical problems solving through using mobile</p><p>learning on the seventh grade students ability to solve them in Jordan. International Journal of</p><p>Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(3), 178191. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i3.8713</p><p></p><p>Mohammad Hairol Azaman Pungut & Marsitah Shahrill. (2014). Students English Language Abilities in</p><p>Solving Mathematics Word Problems. Mathematics</p><p>Education Trends and Research, 2014, 1-11. 10.5899/2014/metr-00048.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Afifi Baharudin Setambah. (2019). Meningkatkan kemahiran penambahan dan penolakan pecahan</p><p>pelajar tahun 4 melalui Fraction Cipher. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 9(1), 26-35.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Afifi Baharudin Setambah, Norain Mohd Tajudin & Mazlini Adnan. (2017). Adventure based</p><p>learning module: content validity and reliability process. International Journal of Academic</p><p>Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 615-623.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Shahril Othman. (2013). Keberkesanan modul pengurusan tekanan (MPT)</p><p>bagi mengurus tekanan kerja dalam kalangan guru (Unpublished doctoral dissetation). Universiti</p><p>Kebangsaan Malaysia: Selangor.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Suhaimi Omar, Noor Shah Saad & Mohd. Uzi Dollah. (2017). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar guru</p><p>matematik sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik, 7(1), 32-46.</p><p></p><p>Mokhtar Ismail. (2011). Kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatif dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Moradmand, N., Datta, A. & Oakley, G. (2014). The Design and Implementation of an Educational</p><p>Multimedia Mathematics Software : Using ADDIE to Guide Instructional System Design. The Journal of</p><p>Appied Instructional Design, 4(1), 3749.</p><p>Retrieved from http://www.jaidpub.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Moramand- Datta-Oakley.pdf</p><p></p><p>Muhamad Hasan Abdul Rahman. (2000). Media pengajaran: Penghasilan baharu pengajaran berkesan.</p><p>Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Hafizhuddin. (2016). Kesan penggunaan modul penintegrasian geogebra topic Trigonometri</p><p>terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi bagi murid berpencapaian rendah (Unpublished master's</p><p>dissertation). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Tanjung Malim.</p><p></p><p>Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in</p><p>Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.</p><p></p><p>Murata, A. (2008). Mathematics Teaching and Learning as a Mediating Process: The Case of Tape</p><p>Diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 374-406. 10.1080/10986060802291642.</p><p></p><p>Naiser, E.A.,Wright, W.E. & Robert, C. (2004). Teaching Fractions: Strategies Used for Teaching</p><p>Fractions to Middle Grades Students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 18. 193-198.</p><p>10.1080/02568540409595034.</p><p></p><p>Najib ,A.G.M. (2012). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan (Cetakan</p><p>Kedua). Skudai, Johor: UTM PRESS.</p><p></p><p>Najihah Mustaffa.(2017). Integrating algebraic thinking in problem based learning among lower</p><p>secondary school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,</p><p>Johor.</p><p></p><p>Nasarudin Abdullah. (2014). Kesan Pendekatan Strategi Berfikir Dan Perwakilan Visualisasi Dalam</p><p>Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Penyelesaiaan Masalah Matematik Berayat Di Sekolah Rendah </p><p>(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor.</p><p></p><p>Ndalichako, J. L. (2013). Analysis of pupils difficulties in solving questions related to</p><p>fractions: The case of primary school leaving examination in Tanzania. Creative Education, 4(9),</p><p>69-73.</p><p></p><p>Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. (7th ed.).</p><p>Pearson: Boston.</p><p></p><p>New, K.H. (2012). Social Change Process of Students At A Private Higher Learning Institution</p><p>(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor.</p><p></p><p>Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils errors on written mathematical task.</p><p>Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31- 43</p><p></p><p>Ng, S. F., & Lee, K. (2009). The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and</p><p>solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 282-313.</p><p></p><p>Nik Nur Fadhlillah Abd Razak, Azurah Mohd Johar, Desi Andriani & Yong, C. Y. (2014). Keupayaan</p><p>penyelesaian masalah matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan 2. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik,</p><p>2(2), 113.</p><p></p><p>Noorbaizura Thambi & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effect of Students Achievement in Fractions using</p><p>GeoGebra. Sainsab, 16, 97106. Retrieved from</p><p>http://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00010213_95273.pdf</p><p></p><p>Noor Shah Saad & Shazalli Abdul Ghani. (2008). Teahing Mathematics Secondary School: Theories and</p><p>Practises (1st ed.). Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris. (2006). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Make Sence and Developing Cognitive</p><p>Abilities (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. (Edisi Kedua). Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris & Latha Mageswari Narayanan. (2011). Error patterns in addition and subtraction of</p><p>fractions among form two students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4, 35-54.</p><p></p><p>Nor Ezah Ariffin & Nurulwahida Azid. (2016). Penggunaan kaedah bar model dalam penyelesaian masalah</p><p>matematik berayat tajuk pecahan. http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.613 287</p><p></p><p>Nor Hasniza Ibrahim. (2012). Model Pengajaran Refleksi Berfokuskan Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan</p><p>Sains dalam Bidang Kimia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,</p><p>Skudai.</p><p></p><p>Norulbiah Ngah & Effandi Zakaria. (2016). Students' Ability in Problems Posing, Mathematical</p><p>Problem-Solving and Attitudes Towards Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 4(1), 1-16.</p><p></p><p>Nurshamela Saim, Marlina Ali & Nor Hasniza Ibahim. (2014). Proses Pembinaan Modul Pro-Mc Physics :</p><p>Fasa Analisis dan Reka Bentuk bagi Model Reka Bentuk Pengajaran ADDIE. Retrieved from</p><p>http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62108/1/MarlinaAli2015_ProsesPembinaanModul Pro-McPhysics.pdf</p><p></p><p>Nurul Haniza Samsudin, Puteri Roslina Abdul Wahid & Salinah Jaafar. (2017).</p><p>Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu Kanak-kanak Pemulihan Khas:Pembinaan bahan bantu mengajar, Jurnal</p><p>Pengajian Melayu, 28, 164-193.</p><p></p><p>OECD (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publications.</p><p></p><p>OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf</p><p></p><p>Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piagets Theory of Cognitive Development to Mathematics Instruction. The</p><p>Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 2630.</p><p></p><p>Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. IOSR</p><p>Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320 7388.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670</p><p></p><p>Othman Lebar. (2012). Penyelidikan Kualitatif:Pengenalan kepada Teori dan Method.</p><p>Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik (Cetakan Pe.), Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Paul, M. & Hlanganipai, N. (2014). Exploring mathematics anxiety: mathematics studentsexperiences.</p><p>Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER</p><p>Publishing, Rome-Italy,5(1). 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n1p283</p><p></p><p>Pehkonen,E.,Naveri,L.&Laine,A.(2013).On Teaching Problem Solving in School</p><p>Mathematics. CEPS Journal, 3(4). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/26832892.pdf</p><p></p><p>Peranginangin Siska & Edy Surya. (2017). An Analysis of Students' Mathematics Problem Solving</p><p>Ability in VII Grade at SMP Negeri 4 Pancurbatu. International Journal of Sciences: Basic</p><p>and Applied Research (IJSBAR),33, 57- 67</p><p></p><p>Pfannenstiel, K., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R. & Porterfield, J. A. (2015). Cognitive Strategy</p><p>Instruction for Teaching Word Problems to Primary-Level Struggling Students. Retrieved from</p><p>http://isc.sagepub.com/content/50/5/291.full.pdf+html</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive Development in Children: Piaget Development and Learning.</p><p>Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1965). The childs conception of number. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.</p><p></p><p>PISA. (2015). PISA Results in Focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-</p><p>2015-results-in-focus.pdf</p><p></p><p>Poch, A., Delinda, V.G & Scheuermann, A. (2015). Students Understanding of</p><p>for Solving Word Problems: A Framework for Assessing Diagram Proficiency.</p><p>Teaching Exceptional Children, 47, 153-162. 10.1177/0040059914558947.</p><p></p><p>Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop a Classroom</p><p>Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic: Hawker Brownlow.</p><p></p><p>Polgampala, A. S. V., & Hong, S. (2016). The Impact on Teaching through</p><p>5E Model: Perspectives of Prospective Teachers in Teaching Science in Secondary Schools in Gampaha</p><p>District, Sri Lanka. Education Perspectives, 5(1), 33-49. Retrieved from</p><p>http://43.224.127.162/moe/images/Information/Publications/Research/PDF/Educ ation_pers_2016_A.pdf</p><p></p><p>Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. & Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content</p><p>validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4): 45967.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199</p><p></p><p>Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it; a new aspect of mathematical method. New York: Princeton</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Poly , G. (1957). How To Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method ( 2nd ed.).</p><p>New York: Princeton University Press.</p><p></p><p>Posamentier, A. S. & Krulik, S. (1998). Problem-Solving Strategies for Efficient and Elegant</p><p>Solutions: A Researce for the Mathematics Teacher. California: Corwin Press.</p><p></p><p>Powell, S. R. & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective Word-Problem Instruction: Using Schemas to</p><p>Facilitate Mathematical Reasoning. Teaching exceptional children, 51(1), 3142. Retrieved from</p><p>doi:10.1177/0040059918777250</p><p></p><p>Prakitipong, N. & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of Mathematics Performance of Grade Five Students</p><p>in Thailand Using Newman Procedure. Retrieved from home.hiro</p><p>shima-u.ac.jp/cice/9-1prakitipongnakamura.pdf</p><p></p><p>Pranab Barman & Dibyendu Bhattacharyya (2015). Effectiveness of Constructivist Teaching Method: An</p><p>Experimental Study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences And Humanities, 5(1),</p><p>69-76. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327594672_Effectiveness_of_Construc</p><p>tivist_Teaching_Method_An_Experimental_Study</p><p></p><p>Ragu Ramasamy & Marzita Puteh.(2018). Bar Model Method for Higher Order Thinking Skills Questions</p><p>in Mathematics for Dual Language Program Pupils. International Journal of Academic Research in</p><p>Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 14561462. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4855</p><p></p><p>Rajendran Nagappan. (2008). Teaching & Acquiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Theory &</p><p>Practice.Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Richey, R. C., Klein, J., & Nelson, W. (2004). Developmental research:</p><p>Studies of Instructional design and development. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates</p><p>Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Richey, R. C., and Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and</p><p>issues. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.</p><p></p><p>Rita Norita & Mulia Putra. (2016). Using task like PISAs problem to support students creativity</p><p>in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 33- 44.</p><p></p><p>Roszelina Abd Rahman & Maria Salih. (2014). Proses penjanaan visualisasi</p><p>mental dalam kalangan pelajar biologi bagi konsep abstrak osmosis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan</p><p>Matematik, 4(1), 97-122.</p><p></p><p>Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., Goldsby, D., Gonzalez, G. E., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Capraro, R. M.</p><p>(2015). Middle Grade Preservice Teachers Mathematical</p><p>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_16</p><p></p><p>Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). Using Manipulatives in Solving and Posing</p><p>Mathematical Problems. Creative Education, 6, 1718-1725.</p><p>http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.616173</p><p></p><p>Roslina Radzali, Subahan Mohd Meerah & Effandi Zakaria. (2010). Hubungan antara Kepercayaan</p><p>Matematik, Metakognisi dan Perwakilan Masalah dengan Kejayaan Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik.</p><p>Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2) (2010): 1-</p><p>7.</p><p></p><p>Rossett, A. (1987). Techniques In Training And Performance Development Series: Training Needs</p><p>Assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.</p><p></p><p>Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content</p><p>validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2),</p><p>94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94.</p><p></p><p>Runisah, Herman Tatang. & Dahlan Jarnawi Afgani. (2017). Using the 5E Learning Cycle with</p><p>Metacognitive Technique to Enhance Students Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. International</p><p>Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 87-89. 10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5698.</p><p></p><p>Rusell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction: A guide to the design, selection,</p><p>utilization and evaluation of modular material. United States: Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Salemeh, Z. & Etchells, M. J. (2016). A Case Study: Sources of Difficulties in Solving Word</p><p>Problems in an International Private School. Electronic International Journal of Education,</p><p>Arts, and Science, 2, 149-163. Retrieved from http://www.eijeas.com</p><p></p><p>Sapitry Hesty, Maskun Maskun & Ekwandari Yustina Sri. (2014). Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle 5E</p><p>Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif. PESAGI (Jurnal Pendidikan dan</p><p>Penelitian Sejarah), 2(3), 3347.</p><p></p><p>Sarama, J. & Clements, D. (2016). Physical and Virtual Manipulatives:</p><p>What Is Concrete? Retrieved from doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_4.</p><p></p><p>Sarver, M. E. (2006). Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving: Case Studies of Six Seventh</p><p>Grade Students. Montclair State University, United States: New Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). A Cognitive-Metacognitive Framework for Mathematical</p><p>Performance. Bloomington: Mathematics Education Development Center.</p><p></p><p>Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's All The Fuss About Metacognition? In Cognitive Science and</p><p>Mathematics Education. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associated. 189 - 215.</p><p></p><p>Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (5th</p><p>ed.). Haddington: John Wiley & Sons.</p><p></p><p>Sepeng, P. & Sigola, S. (2013). Making Sense of Errors Made by Learners in Mathematical Word</p><p>Problem Solving. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,</p><p>4(13). Doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p325</p><p></p><p>Serdyukov, P. (2017), "Innovation in education: what works, what doesnt, and what to do about</p><p>it?". Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007</p><p></p><p>Shaharuddin Md Salleh, & Nornajidah A. Rahman. (2010). Pembangunan Modul Panduan Pemilihan</p><p>Kombinasi Warna Bagi Rekabentuk Skrin Dalam Pembangunan Aplikasi Multimedia Dan Laman</p><p>Web. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10985/</p><p></p><p>Shamsudin Drahman & Fatimah Saleh ( 2004 ). Visualisasi Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik</p><p>Berayat. Jumal Pendidik dan Pendidikan,19, 47-66.</p><p></p><p>Shara Nor Raifana, Noor Shah Saad and Mod Uzi (2019). Analysis type of error through Newman error</p><p>method in the problem solving word mathematical</p><p>among pupils in Year 5. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 6(2), 109-119. Retrieved</p><p>from http://ojs.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/2170</p><p></p><p>Sharifah Osman, Che Nurul Azieana Che Yang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Norulhuda Ismail, Hanifah Jambari &</p><p>Jeya Amantha Kumar. (2018). Enhancing Students Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills through</p><p>Bar Model Visualisation Technique. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education,</p><p>13(3), 273 279. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3919</p><p></p><p>Sharma, Y. (2014). The effect of strategy and mathemativs anxiety on mathematical creativity of</p><p>school student. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 25-37.</p><p></p><p>Shukla, D. D & Dusungnoen, A. P. (2016). Students perceived level and teachers teaching</p><p>strategies of higher order thinking skills: A study on higher educational institution in</p><p>Thailand. Journal of Education and Practice,7(12), 211-219.</p><p></p><p>Sibley, R. (2015). Bar Diagrams: The Logical, Visual Problem-Solving Strategy.</p><p>Retrieved from https://macmillanmh.com/FL/mathconnects_econsultant/assets/rscrharticles/bar_</p><p>diagrams.pdf</p><p></p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan</p><p>Modul Akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H. & Zhou, X. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for</p><p>theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 1319. Retrieved from</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004</p><p></p><p>Siti Nurhani Abdul Ghani & Siti Mistima Maat. (2018). Misconception of Fraction among Middle Grade</p><p>Year Four Pupils at Primary School. Research on Education and Psychology, 2(1), 111-125. </p><p>Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/rep/issue/39781/471516</p><p></p><p>Sivapakkiam Ramasamy, Fadzilah Abd. Rahman, Habsah Ismail, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf & Rozita Radhiah</p><p>Said. (2016). Teachers Levels of Knowledge and Interest on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)</p><p>according to the Field Taught and Category of Schools. Journal of Modern Education Review, 6(9),</p><p>611-621</p><p></p><p>Sourav Mandal & Sudip Kumar Naskar. (2019). Solving Arithmetic Mathematical Word Problems: A Review</p><p>and Recent Advancements. 10.1007/978-981-10- 7590-2_7.</p><p></p><p>Sulaiman Shakib Mohd. Noor. (2012). Model Khidmat Nasihat Keluarga Islam Di Institusi Masjid</p><p>(Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor). Malaysia.</p><p>http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/31406/1/SulaimanShakibPFP2012.pdf</p><p></p><p>Susanti Elly, Kusumah Yaya S, Sabandar Jozua & Darhim. (2014). Computer- Assisted Realistic</p><p>Mathematics Education for Enhancing Students Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Computer, 5(18).</p><p></p><p>Tagle, J., Belecina, R. R. & Ocampo, J. M. (2016). Developing algebraic thinking skills among grade</p><p>three pupils through pictorial models. International Journal for Educational Studies, 8(2),</p><p>147-158.</p><p></p><p>Tamilselvan Subramaniam. (2015). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian Perisian E-PBL ReC Untuk Kursus</p><p>Kejuruteraan. Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Tan T. N. & Mohini Mohamed. (2003). Kajian Kes Terhadap Jenis Tingkah Laku Metakognitif dalam</p><p>Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik. Johor Bahru: Puteri Pan Pasific.</p><p></p><p>Tanner, K. D. (2010). Order matters: using the 5E model to align teaching with how people learn.</p><p>CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 159-164.</p><p></p><p>Thirunavukkarasu. (2014). Effectiveness Of Bar Model In Enhancing The Learning Of Mathematics At</p><p>Primary Level. International Journal of Teacher Educational</p><p>Research (IJTER), 3(1). Retrieved from www.ijter.com</p><p></p><p>Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2009). How to Increase Higher Order Thinking.</p><p>Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.readingrockets.org/article/how-increase-higher-orderthinking</p><p></p><p>TIMSS. (2011). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved from</p><p>https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_Full Book.pdf</p><p></p><p>TIMSS. (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved from</p><p>http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/</p><p></p><p>Tong, D., & Loc, N. (2017). Students errors in solving mathematical word problems and their</p><p>ability in indentifying errors in wrong solutions. European Journal of Education Studies,3 (6),</p><p>226-241. Retrieved from https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/741/2100</p><p></p><p>Tony Karnain, Md Nor Bakar, Seyed Yaser Mousavi Siamakani, Hossein Mohammadikia & Muhammad</p><p>Candra. (2014). Exploring the Metacognitive Skills of Secondary School Students' Use During Problem</p><p>Posing. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Sciences) 67(1), 27 - 32.</p><p></p><p>Tunku Badariah Tunku Ahmad. (2014). Between School Factors and Teacher Factors</p><p>: What Inhibits Malaysian Science Teachers From Using ICT ? The Malaysian Online Journal of</p><p>Educational Technology, 2(1), 110.</p><p></p><p>Ummu Nasibah Nasohah, Muhammad Izuan Abd Gani, & Nazipah Mat Shaid @ Md Shaid. (2015, February).</p><p>Model ADDIE dalam Proses Reka Bentuk Modul Pengajaran: Bahasa Arab Tujuan Khas di Universiti Sains</p><p>Islam Malaysia Sebagai Contoh. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Language Teaching ISeLT</p><p>2015, Bangi, Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S. & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school</p><p>mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston, MA: Pearson</p><p></p><p>Verschaffel, L. (1999). Realistic mathematical modelling and problem solving in the upper</p><p>elementary school: Analysis and improvement. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.</p><p></p><p>Wan Syafii (2014). Keberkesanaan Penggunaan Modul Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah dalam Pengajaran</p><p>dan Pembelajaran Biologi di Sekolah Menengah (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti</p><p>Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.</p><p></p><p>Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Westenskow, A., Packenham, P. M., Pence, K. A., Shumway, J. F. & Jordan, K. (2014). Cute</p><p>Drawings? The disconnect between students' pictorial representations and their mathematics</p><p>responses to fraction questions.</p><p>International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 81-105.</p><p></p><p>White, K. M. (2012). The effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and</p><p>manipulatives on math achievement of middle school students in Georgia. Lynchburg, Virginia:</p><p>Liberty University.</p><p></p><p>Wijaya, A. (2017). The relationships between Indonesian fourth graders difficulties in fractions</p><p>and the opportunity to learn fractions: A snapshot of TIMSS results. International Journal of</p><p>Instruction, 10(4), 221-236. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10413a</p><p></p><p>Willingham, D.T. (2017). Ask the cognitive scientist do manipulative help students learn? American</p><p>Educator, 27-40. Retrived from</p><p>https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/ae_fall2017_willingham.pdf</p><p></p><p>Wilson, J. (1999). Defining Metacognition: A Step Towards Recognising Metacognition As A Worthwhile</p><p>Part of The Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/dataipublications/I999/wiI99527.pdf</p><p></p><p>Wong, M. & Evans, D. (2011). Assessing students understanding of fraction equivalence. Fractions:</p><p>Teaching for Understanding. Adelaide: The</p><p>Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc.</p><p></p><p>Woolfolk, A. (2013). Educational Psychology (12th ed.). New Jersey, United States: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Xin, Y. P., Wiles, B. & Lin, Y. Y. (2008). Teaching Conceptual Model-Based Word Problem Story</p><p>Grammar to Enchance Mathematcis Problem Solving. The Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 163-178.</p><p></p><p>Yap, J. L. & Siti Rahaimah Ali. (2018). Keberkesanan pendekatan model bar dalam penyelesaian</p><p>masalah berayat matematik operasi tolah tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik</p><p>Malaysia, 8(2), 35-44. Retrieved from</p><p>https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/2197</p><p></p><p>Yazgan, Y. (2016). Fourth grade and non-routine problems: Are strategies decisive for success?</p><p>European Journal of Education Studies. 2(4), 100-120.</p><p></p><p>Yeap, B. H. (2008). The Singapore Mathematics Curriculum and Mathematical Communication.Retrieved</p><p>from www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/math/apec/apec2008/papers/PDF/13.</p><p>YeapBanHar_Singapore.pdf</p><p></p><p>Yeo, K. K. J. (2009). Secondary 2 Students' Difficulties in Solving Non-Routine Problems.</p><p>International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 1-30.</p><p></p><p>Yuan, S. (2013). Incorporating Polyas Problem Solving Method in Remedial Math.</p><p>Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(1), 96-107.10.5642/jhummath.201301.08 .</p><p></p><p>Yusri Abdullah,Rosnaini Mahmud, Habibah Ab. Jalil & Shaffee Mohd Daud.(2016). Analisis Kesalahan</p><p>dalam Menyelesaikan Operasi Penambahan dan Penolakan Pecahan dalam Kalangan Murid Tahun Empat.</p><p>International Journal of Education and Training, 2(2), 1-9.</p><p></p><p>Zarimah Zainal & Nor'ain Mohd. Tajudin. (2011). Proses Metakognisi Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah</p><p>Matematik Bukan Rutin. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 1(1). Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.myjurnal.my/filebank/published_article/25920/02.pdf</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>

Similar Items