Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)

This Self-Regulated Learning research was conducted to profile and analyze motivational aspects and learning strategies of science students in Malaysia. An improved instrument in Bahasa Melayu called The Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire-Revised or MSLQ-R was developed for this purpose...

全面介紹

Saved in:

書目詳細資料
主要作者:	Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
格式:	thesis
語言:	zsm
出版:	2010
主題:	LB Theory and practice of education
在線閱讀:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=820
標簽:	添加標簽沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:820
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
description	This Self-Regulated Learning research was conducted to profile and analyze motivational aspects and learning strategies of science students in Malaysia. An improved instrument in Bahasa Melayu called The Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire-Revised or MSLQ-R was developed for this purpose. This instrument was adapted from Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire MSLQ developed by Pintrich et al., (1991). The Cronbach alpha values for the first pilot study were 0.817 for motivation and 0.922 for the learning strategies. In the second pilot study the aspect of motivation had a value of 0.894 the while learning strategies was 0.927. Both pilot studies revealed a high internal reliability of the instrument. The findings showed that the mean score of motivation (5.34) is higher than the mean score for the learning strategies (4.55). A multiple regresion test conducted on the hyphotesis showed that the two dimensions, namely motivation (=0.21, T=4.15, p <0.00) and learning strategies (=-0.23, T=-4.65, p <0.00) were significant predictors of Self-Regulated Learning. There was no significant difference between students of different demographic background on SRL as a whole, motivation (p >0.05, p >0.05) however a significant difference was shown in the learning strategies (p=0.01 <0.05). There was a significant difference between different genders in SRL. This difference was seen in motivation (p <0.05, p <0.05) but not in the learning strategies (p=0.07 >0.05). There is a significant difference between the different races (Malays, Chinese and Indians) on both motivation and learning strategies (p <0.05). A significant difference was also shown between high and low income groups (p=0.01 <0.05). The qualitative analysis suggests that there are SRL characteristics in the process of teaching such as goal setting, motivation and the overall teaching method. Data from students interviews showed that students were active practitioners of SRL, having characteristics such as making extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning, doing rehearsals, involved in peer learning and ability to seek help. However there are other aspects of SRL that was neglected. The implication of this findings can help students, teachers, student teacher and family to understand the SRL strategies that could come into play during teaching and learning. The impact of this study is to use SRL as a tool that can be practiced and integrated into the teaching and learning of science subjects in future. Furthemore, SRL strategies may help in enhancing students academic achievement disregarding their demographic profile and status.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
author_facet	Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
author_sort	Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
title	Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
title_short	Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
title_full	Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
title_fullStr	Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
title_full_unstemmed	Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
title_sort	analisis ciri-ciri pembelajaran kawalan kendiri (pkk) pelajar sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (ir)
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate	2010
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=820
_version_	1747832913636884480
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8202020-02-27 Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR) 2010 Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad LB Theory and practice of education This Self-Regulated Learning research was conducted to profile and analyze motivational aspects and learning strategies of science students in Malaysia. An improved instrument in Bahasa Melayu called The Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire-Revised or MSLQ-R was developed for this purpose. This instrument was adapted from Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire MSLQ developed by Pintrich et al., (1991). The Cronbach alpha values for the first pilot study were 0.817 for motivation and 0.922 for the learning strategies. In the second pilot study the aspect of motivation had a value of 0.894 the while learning strategies was 0.927. Both pilot studies revealed a high internal reliability of the instrument. The findings showed that the mean score of motivation (5.34) is higher than the mean score for the learning strategies (4.55). A multiple regresion test conducted on the hyphotesis showed that the two dimensions, namely motivation (=0.21, T=4.15, p <0.00) and learning strategies (=-0.23, T=-4.65, p <0.00) were significant predictors of Self-Regulated Learning. There was no significant difference between students of different demographic background on SRL as a whole, motivation (p >0.05, p >0.05) however a significant difference was shown in the learning strategies (p=0.01 <0.05). There was a significant difference between different genders in SRL. This difference was seen in motivation (p <0.05, p <0.05) but not in the learning strategies (p=0.07 >0.05). There is a significant difference between the different races (Malays, Chinese and Indians) on both motivation and learning strategies (p <0.05). A significant difference was also shown between high and low income groups (p=0.01 <0.05). The qualitative analysis suggests that there are SRL characteristics in the process of teaching such as goal setting, motivation and the overall teaching method. Data from students interviews showed that students were active practitioners of SRL, having characteristics such as making extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning, doing rehearsals, involved in peer learning and ability to seek help. However there are other aspects of SRL that was neglected. The implication of this findings can help students, teachers, student teacher and family to understand the SRL strategies that could come into play during teaching and learning. The impact of this study is to use SRL as a tool that can be practiced and integrated into the teaching and learning of science subjects in future. Furthemore, SRL strategies may help in enhancing students academic achievement disregarding their demographic profile and status. 2010 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=820 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=820 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Abd. Rahim Rashid. (1998). Kaedah dan metodologi yang berkesan pengajaran- pembelajaran sejarah. Kertas kerja kursus Kursus guru-guru Sejarah MARA pada 20hb24hb April.Bangunan Mara , Kuala Lumpur.Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students learning strategiesand motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3):260-267.Anderman, L. H. & Anderman, E.M. (1999). Social predictors of changes instudents achievement goalOrientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 21- 37.Anderson, G., Benjamin, D. & Fuss, M. (1994). The Determinant Of Success InUniversity, Introductory Economics Courses . Journal Of Economic Education.25:99-120.Akersson, V.L., Flick, L.B. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The influence of primary childrensideas in science on teaching practce. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(4): 363-385.Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.Azizi Yahya & Jaafar Sidek Latif (2005). Membentuk Identiti Remaja. Pahang: PTS Publications &Distributions Sdn Bhd.Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaluddin Rali, Yusuf Boon & Abd. Rahim Hamdan (2007) Mengusai Pendidikan dalam Penyelididkan;Teori, analisis & Interpretasi data. PTS ProfesionalPublishing Sdn. Bhd.Baker, D. (2003). Equity issues in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.),International Handbook of Science Education. London: Kluwer Academic.Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-eficancy in cognitive development andfunctioning. Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117-148.Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of control. New York: FreemanBaird, J.R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. Dlm. E.Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.). The Student Laboratory and the Science Curriculum.London, Routledge.Baird, J.R. & Mitchell, I. J. (Ed.) (1986). Improving the quality of teaching andlearning: An Australian case study - the PEEL project. Melbourne, Monash UniversityPrintery.Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein, J. (1998). Theories, principles and laws.Education in Chemistry. 5 : 89-92.Biggs, J.B & Telfer (1987). Learning Process Questionnaire Manual. Melbourne:Australian Council for Educational Research.Beyer, B. K. (1997). Improve student thinking: A comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Brown, A. L. (1997). Metacognition, executive control, self regulation and other more mysteriousmechanism. In Weinert, F. E. & Kluwe, R. H.(Eds) Metacognition, motivation and understanding. 65-116. Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Butler, D. L., Novak Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S. & Beckingham, B. (2004)Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers professional development, Teaching andTeacher Education 20, pp. 435- 455.Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 4184).New York: Academic Press.Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T, & Chen, I.D. (2002). The Effect of Concept mapping to text comprehensionand summarization. Jounal of Experimental Education, 71(1). 5-23.Chamot, A. U. & O'Malley, J. M. (1992). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridgeto the mainstream. Dlm. P. A. Richard-Amato dan M. A. Snow (Ed.), The multicultural classroom:Readings for content-area teachers. White Plains: Longman.Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F. & Klopfer, L.E. (1985). Cognitive research and the design ofscience instruction. Educational Psychologist. 17(5): 31-53.Christine C.M. G & Zhang Donglan (2002). A Metacognitive Framework for ReflectiveJournals. In: Agnes Chang S.C. & Christine C.M. Goh eds. Teachers Handbook on Teaching Generic Thinking Skills. Singapore: Prentice Hall. 8 21.Claudia Gama. (2000). The Role of Metacognition in Interactive LearningEnvironments. Kertas kerja dibentangkan ITS'2000 Conference - YoungResearchers' Track, Montreal, California, June 2000.Claudia Gama, C. (2001). Metacognition and reflection in ITS: increasing awareness to improvelearning. Dlm. J. D. Moore. (Ed.). Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press: Brazil.Grigss, S. A. (1985). Conselling students through their individual learning styles. The NationalInstitute of Education, The University Of MichigansChyung, S. Y. (1996). The effects of conceptual tempo and computer-assisted instructionalenvironment on college studentss self-regulated learning and acedamic achievement.Dissertation abstract. Texas Tech University.Claxton, C. S. (1990). Fostering student learning and development through effective teaching. In Robert M. Hashway(Ed.), Handbook of Developmental Education.Corno, L. (1996). The Metasognitive Control Compenents of Self-RegulatedLearning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346Corno, L., & Mardinach (1983). The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning andMotivation. Educational Psychology, 18, 88-108.Corno, L. (2001). The metacognitive control components of self regulated learning.Contemparory Education Psychology, 11, 333-346Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrativereview. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 171-200.Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Marison, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education (5?? edition) diperolehi pada 12 Januari 2009 daripadahttp://books.google.com/books?id=tD8lP40zoHoC&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103&dq=purposive+sampling+in+education+research&source=bl&ots=FsS9xH4uaV&sig=qTXuoYvA4JVUcd6w8XsWjUg05C0&hl=en&ei=RIyPSqfILpiVkAWAodW7Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3Crow, L.D & Crow, A. (1983). Educational Pyshocology. New York. American Book Company. DalamMarzuki Ngah (2002). Hubungan Antara Konsep Kendiri Akademik,Konsep Kendiri Bukan AkademikDan Motivasi Pencapaian Terhadap Pencapaian Sains. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 daripada http://mpkt.edu.my/penyelidikan/marzuki02Creswell, J. W. (2003a). Advanced mixed method research designs. Handbook on mixedmethods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications, 209-240.Creswell, J. W. (2003b). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodsapproaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatinglitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Daniel, G. E. (2003). Effects of Cofnitive Strategy in Instruction on MathematicalProblem Solving of Middle School Students with LearningDisabilities.Disertation abstract Ohio State University.D'Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching:ecological examples. Bioscience 53: 1221-28.David, J. N. & Debra, M-D., (2006). A Formative assessment and self regulated learning:A Model and seven priciples of good feedback practice. Diterbitkan dalam Studies in HigherEducation (2006), Vol. 31(2), 199-218 diperoleh pada 11 Ogos 2009 daripadahttp://tltt.strath.ac.uk/REAP/public/Resources/DN_SHE_Final.pdfDavidson, J.E., Deuser, R. & Sternberg, R.J. (1996). The Role of Metacognition in Problem Solving. In: Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A.P. eds.Metacognition:Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Duncan, T. G. & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The Making of Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire . Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.Fraenkel, J.R. (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (3rd ed.) New York:McGraw-Hill.Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick, L. B. Eds. The natureof Intelligence, 231-235. Hilldale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Fatin Aliah Phang Abdullah. (2005). Hubungan dan Peranan Kemahiran Metakognitif DalamMenyelesaikan Masalah Fizik Dikalangan Pelajar Sains Tingkatan Empat. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia: Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan)Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21stCentury. New York: Basic.Gay, L.R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2009) .Educational Research: Competencies for Analysisand Applications. Upper Saddle Rier &Columbus : Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysisand Applications. (8th edition). NJ: Pearson.Gage, N. L. & Berliner, D. C. (1988). Educational Psychology. 4th. ed. Boston: HoughtonMifflin Company. 170 201.Gaskill, P. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2004). Effects on a memory strategy on second-graders performance and self efficacy. Contemporary EducationalPsychology, 29(1), 27-49.Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond Conceptual Change Learning in Science Education: Focusing onTransfer, Durability and Metacognition. Educational Research. 42(2): 119 139.Gunstone, R. & Northfield, J. (1992). Labour Law and State School Teachers: The VICTorianExperience Australian Schools & the Law. Dlm. Jane Edwards, Andrew Knott & Dan (Ed).Teaching in School. London: Law Book Company LimitedGunstone, R.F. (1995). The importance of specific science content in the enhancemen ofmetacognition. Dlm. P.J. Fensham, R.F. Gunstone dan R.T. White (Ed.). The content ofscience : a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: The Falmer Press.Habibollah Naderi , Rohani Abdullah, Tengku Aizan Hamid & Jamaluddin Sharir (2008).Intelligence and Gender as Predictors of Academic Achievement Among UndergraduateStudents. European Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 2 (2008).diperolehpada 2 november 2009 daripada http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_17.pdfHadwin, A.F., Winne, P.H., Stockley, D.B., Nesbit, J.C. & Woszczyna, C. (2001). ContextModerates StudentsSelf Report about How they Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93,(477-485)Heidrun Stoger & Albert Ziegler. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self regulated learning program for gifted mathematic underachievers. International EducationJournal, 6(2), 261271.Holloway, J. H. (2003). Addressing the needs of homeless Students. Educational Leadership60(4):89-91.Hwang, Y., & Levin, J. R., (2002). Examination of Middle School StudentsIndependent use of a Complex Mnemonic System. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1). 25-38.Hwang, Young Suk, & Konstantinos Vrongistinos. (2002). Elementary inservice teachers self-regulated learning strategies related to their academic achievements.Journal of Instructional Psychology 29 (3): 147-54.Janssen, D. A. (2006). The Ultimate Self Challenge: Time Management. Diperoleh pada 25 Jun 2009 daripadahttp://www.danieljanssen.com/ArchiveArticles/timemanagement.shtmlJames Kuo, Chris Hagie & Michael T Miller. (2003). Encouraging College Student Success.International Education Journal, 14, 6067.Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structureassociated with theory-of-mind development in young children.Developmental Psychology, 32, 7078.Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. O. (1990). The effect of concept mapping onstudents' anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10),951-960.Johari Surif & Mohammad Yusof Arshad (2004). Strategi Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains: SuatuPerspektif Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 10: 1 16.Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C. & Yueh, H.P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners incritical thinking. Tech Trends. 43(2): 24-32Johnson, A. P. (2005). A Short Guide to Action Research. 2nd ed. Boston:PearsonJones, L., Jordan, K. & Stillings, N. (2001). Molecular visualization in scienceeducation:report from the molecular visualization in science education workshop, diperoleh pada 5.10.2009 daripadahttp://Pro3.Chem.Pitt.Edu/Workshop/Workshop_Report_180701.Pdf.Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. InD. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning(pp.13-39).Kasper, L. F. (1996). Assessing the Metacognitive Growth of ESL Student Writers. TESL-EJ Vol. 3 No.1 November 1997.Keefe, J.W. (1988). Learning Style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: NationalAssociation of secondary School Principles.Keffe, J. (1987). Learning styles theory and practice. Reston: National Association of SecondaryScholls Principals.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2000. KL: KementerianPendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2004). Projek Sekolah Bestari. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008daripada http://www.moe.edu.myKopper. (2002). Ko-kaunselor Pemimpin Pelajar. Yayasan Nurul Yakin: diperoleh pada 10 Jun 2008 daripada Portal Pendidikan Utusan.(http://www.tutor.com.my/tutor/kopper/index.asp?i=7)Lee, L.H. (1997). Goal orientation, goal setting, and achievement performance in collegestudents: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings.DoctoralDissertation, University of Southern California. DissertationAbstracts International 59 (06A) : 1905.Lee, K.W.L. (2002). A reflection on an in-service course for chemistry teachers inSingapore. Dlm. T.A. Girl, K.W.L. Lee, N.K. Goh dan L.S. Chia. New paradigms for scienceeducation. A perspective of teaching problem solving, creative teaching and primary scienceeducation. Singapura: Prentice Hall.Lee, K.W.L. & Fensham, P.J. (1996). A general strategy for solving high school electrochemistryproblems. International Journal of Science Education. 18(5): 543-555.Luke, I. & Hardy, C.A. (1999). Appreciating the complexity of learning in physical education:the utilization of a metacognitive ability conceptual framework. Sport, Education andSociety. 4(2): 175-191.Levinson, D.J. (1981). Exploration In Biography: Evolution Of The Individual Life Structure inAdulthood. New York: John Wiley.Long, H. B. (1990). Understanding Adult Leaners. Dalam M. W. Galbraith, Adult LearningMethods: A Guide fo effective Instruction. Malabar, Florida: RobertE. Krieger Publishing Company.Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning aboutteaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 53 (1), 33-43.Maria, T. C. R. & Pedro, F. C. A. (2004). Gender differences in academic motivation of secondaryschool students published in Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1)97-112 ISSN:1696-2095 (2004) diperoleh pada23 Jun 2008 daripada http://www.investigacionpsicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/3/english/ Art_3_31.pdfMayer, (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional designmethods across different media. Learning and Instruction. 13(1). 125- 139.Martin M.O, Mullis,V.S, Gonzalez, E.J & Chrostowski, S. J.(2004). TIMSS 2003International Science Report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School ofEducation: Boston CollegeMcCall, G. J., & J. L. Simmons (eds.). lssues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader(Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969). Diambil pada November 2008 dihttp://pod.nku.edu/pdfs/doug/geoSurvey.pdfMeece, J. L. & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students achievement goals. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 85, 582-590.Miles, . B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks,CA:SageMeister, C & Rosenshine, B.. (1992). Scaffolds for teaching higher-order cognitivestrategies. In A.C. Ornstein (Ed.) Teaching: Theory into Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Mohamad Johdi Salleh. (2003) Interaksi Guru-Pelajar di Bilik Darjah dan PrestasiCemerlang Penilaian Menengah Rendah (PMR). 2 - 4 September 2003. International Seminaron Learning and Motivation. Organizer: School of Cognitive Sciences and Education, UUM.Venue: Copthorne Hotel, Batu Ferringhi, PenangMohd Zaaba & Zuraidah Hj. Ismail (2004) dalam Abdul Sukor Shaari,Yahya Don dan Yaakob Daud (2005).Motivasi Belajar Dan Harga Diri:Hubungan Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Dan Kegiatan KokurikulumPelajar Sekolah Menengah Fakulti Sains Kognitif Dan Pendidikan Universiti Utara Malaysia. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 daripada http://www.psb1.uum.edu.my/tesis/Penyelidikan%20Print/2005/DR.%20ABD.%20SUKOR%20SHAARI,%20YAHYA%20DON%20DAN%20YAAKOB%20DAUD.pdfMohd Ruzi (2000). Konsep Sekolah Bestari. Diperolehi pada 15 febuari 2009 daripadahttp://www.mohdruzi.com/Konsep%20Sekolah%20Bestari.htmMohammad Yusof Arshad, Johari Surif, Tan Soo Yin, Dalina Daud & Uthayakumari a/pIbrahim@Sellakutty. (2002). Kefahaman pelajar mengenai konsep zarah: Perbandingan responpelajar di Malaysia dan pelajar di United Kingdom. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti TeknologiMalaysia. 8(1): 21-38.Ng Lee Yen, Kamariah Abu Bakar, Samsilah Roslan, Wong Su Lan & Petri Zabariah Megat Abd. Rahman (2005). Predictors of Self-Regulated learning in Malaysian Smart School. International Education Journal. 2005.6(3), 343- 353.Ng Wai Kong (1998). Psychological Measurement for Malaysian School Children.Unit Kajian Penyelidikan Asas. Sekolah Pendidikan. Universiti sains MalaysiaNisbet, J. (1991). Methods and Approaches. In: Maclure, S. & Davies, P. eds. Learningto Think: Thinking to Learn: The Proceedings of the 1989 OECD Conference Organized by the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 177 185.Nor Hashimah Jalaludin (2004). Penguasaan Bahasa Melayu oleh Pelajar Melayu dalam Arus Globalisasi dlm Jurnal Bahasa Jld 4 Bil. 1 Mac 2004. DBP.diperolehi pada 12 Ogos 2009 daripadahttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_09.pdfOsborn , R.J. & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science : A generative process.Science Education. 67(4) : 489-504Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F & Gilbert, J. (1983). Childrens science and its consequencesfor teaching. Science Education. 66(4): 623-633.Osman Mohamed & Hannafin (1992). Metacognitive Research and Theory: Analysis and Implications forInstructional Design. Educational Technology Research and Development. 40(2): 83 99.Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Contructing theroies, identities and action ofself-regulated learners. Dalam B. J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunck (Eds) Self-Regulated Learning & Academic achievement: Theoritical Perspective (pp 253-287) Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation ofexceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.Phillips, D. & Zimmerman, M. (1990). The developmental course of perceived competence and incompetence among competent children. Dalam R.J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian,eds., Competence Considered (pp. 4166). New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.Pintrich, P.R & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1):33-40.Pintrich, P. R. (Ed) (1995). Understanding Self-Regulated Learning. New Directions for Teachingand Learning. No 63. Jossey-Bass In.Pitrinch, P.R., Smith, D. A., Gracia, T., & MacKeachie, W.J. (1991). A Manual for the use ofMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MLSQ). Technical Report No. 91-B-004.The Regents of The University of Michigan.Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T. & Mc Keachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictivevalidity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaires (MSLQ). Educational &Psychological Measurement 53 (3): 801-813.Pintrich, P.R.,(2000). Educational Psychology at the Millennium. A look back and a look foward.Educational Psychology 35, 221-226Pintrich, P.R. & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, andApplications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.Pintrich, P. R., dan Zusho, A. (2002). The Development of Academic self regulation: The Role ofCognitive and motivational factors. Dalam . Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.249-284) San Diego, CA: Academic.Pencapaian Sanis dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris: Bandar dan Luar Bandar(2005, 5 April). Utusan Malaysia, ms 8Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (1990). What we really know about strategy instruction.Education Leadership, 48, 31-34.Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Draf Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Fizik : KBSM Tingkatan Empat. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Rashidi Azizan & Abdul Razak Habib (1998). Pengajaran dalam bilik darjah: Kaedah danstrategi. Kajang: Masa Enterprise.Reber, A. S. (1985). Dictionary of Psychology. New Zealand: Penguin Books. Rickey, D & Stacy, A.M.(2000). The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry.Journal of Chemical Education. 77(7): 915 920.Rop, C.J. (1999). Student Perspectives on Success in High School Chemistry. Journal of Research inScience Teaching. 36(2): 221 237.Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organization Behavior: Concept, Controvercies applications.New Zealand: Penguin Books.Rohani Abdullah. (2001). Perkembangan kanak-kanak. Penilaian secara portfolio.Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Sadiah Baharom, Sharifah Norhaidah Syed Idros & Nordin Abd. Razak (2003). Self- regulatorycognitive and metacognitive learning starategies of preuniversity students: Issues andChallenges. Dalam kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di International Seminar on Learning andMotivation: Issues and Challenges in a Borderless World. (13-15 Oktober 2003, Copthorne Hotel,Penang)Sadiah Baharom, Ong Eng Tek, Marzita Putih, Sopia Mat Yasin., Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman & MuhamadIkhwan Mat Saad, (2009). The Validation and adaptation of MSLQ aimed to assessstudent use of self regulated learning. Paper presented at 1?? International Conference onEducational Research and Practice Enhancing Human Capital through Teacher Education Facultyof Educational Studies UPM 10-11 June 2009Saemah Rahman & John Arul Phillips (2006) Tentang efikasi kendiri. Diperoleh pada17 ogos 2006 daripada http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~jurfpend/journal/vol%2031%202006/full%20article%2031%202006/artikel%2031_2.pdfSamsilah Roslan,Abd. Majid Isa, Othman Mohamad & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi (2006). Hubungan Orientasi Matlamat dengan Penggunaan Strategi Pembelajaran Aturan Kendiri.Diperoleh pada Januari 03, 2009 daripadahttp://myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/5297/1/7.pdfSchraw, G. (1998). Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness. Instructional Science.26(1-2 ): 113 125.Schraw, G., Horn, C, Thorndike-Christ, T & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientationand student achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20:359-368.Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning Theories. New Jersey: Prantice HallSchunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self Regulated and Learning. DalamW.M. Reynolds dan G. E. Millers (Eds) Handbook of psychology, Vol 7:Educationalpsychology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Schurter, W.A. (2002). Comprehension Monitoring: An Aid To Mathematical ProblemSolving. Journal Of Development Education. 26(2).22-32.Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: perspectives on theunderachievement debate, British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 3, 282-95.Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of childrensknowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79.Shu Ya Zhang & Angela I. C. (1995). Chinese Parents Influence on AcademicPerformance. Diperolehi pada 7 Nov 2009 daripadahttp://www.ncbe.gwe.edu.Shulman, L. S., (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problemsolving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research : A Practical Handbook. London, Thousand Oaks.New Delhi: Sage.Sheridan, J. C & Lyndall, G. S. (2003). SPSS Analysis without Anguish. Version 11.0 for windows.John Wiley & Sons Ausrtalia, Ltd.Schraeder, L.L. (1997). The Effectiveness of Color Coding on Middle School StudentsAbility to Differentiate Explicit from Implication Information in Narrative and ExpositoryTexts. ERIC: Ed422737Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge UniversityPressTabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Computer-Assisted Research Design andAnalysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem based learning approaches:International perspectives. Singapore: Thomson.Thomas, R. & Hoper, E. (1991). Simulations : An opportunity we are missing.Journal of Reseach on Computing in Education. 23(3): 497-512Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods(2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.TIMSS (2007). International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEAs Trends inInternational Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Boston College: TIMSS& PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.Unit Perancang Ekonomi (2001). Rangka Rancangan Jangka Panjang Ketiga 2001- 2010. Kuala Lumpur.Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.Van Zile-Tamsen, C.V. (1998). Examining metacognitive self-regulation within the Context ofdaily academic tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York,1998. DissertationAbstracts International 44 (11A): 3320Wan Shazmimi Wan Mustapha (2004). Langkah Mengekalkan Minat danMembangkitkan Motivasi Pelajar oleh Guru-Guru sains Peringkat Menengah Atas. Projek IjazahSarjana Muda Sains dan pendidikan (Biologi) yang tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia.Wan Noorazah Wan Md. Nawi. 2004. Strategi pembelajaran Biologi pelajar Melayu dan bukan Melayudi UKM: Satu tinjauan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Weinstein, C. E., Ridlay, D. S & Weber, E. S. (1989). Helping students developstrategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership 46(4).Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer., R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C.Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3?? ed.)(pp. 315-327). New York: Mac Millan.Weiner, B. (1992). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of EducationalPsychology 71 (1): 3-25.Weiner, B. (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion,Psychological Review 92: 548-73.Winne, P. (1993), "State-of-the-art instructional computing systems that affordinstruction and bootstrap research", in Jones, M., Winne, P.H. (Eds),Adaptive LearningEnvironments, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. F85.Wlodkoswki, R. J., & Jaynes, J.H. (1990). Eager to learn. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Woolnaugh, B. E. (1994). Factors afecting students choice of science andengineering. International Journal of Science Education 19(6): 659-676.Wolters, A. (1999). The relationship between high school students motivational regulation and their use of Learning strategies, effort and classroom performance. Learningand individual differences, 11 (3), 218-299.Woolfolk, A. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon (648 pp.).Yayasan Strategi Sosial (2005). Masyarakat India di Malaysia. Isu dan Masalah RMK 8;Cadangan RMK 9. diperolehi pada 5 Nov 2009, daripadahttp://www.digitalibrary.my/dmdocuments/malaysiakini/665_First%20Submis sion.pdfYesim Somuncuoglu Ali Yildrim. (2001). Relationship between achievement goal orientationand use of learning strategies. Journal of Education Research, 92, 267276.Yin, RK. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, California,pp.90-91.Yoong Soon & Aminah Ayob (2005). Students Interest in Leaving Science & Technologies(S&T) Topics, Their Attitudes, Perceptions & Priorities towards Important S&T Issues. Schoolof Educational Studies. University Sains Malaysia.Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academicachievement. Dalam B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academicachievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1- 25). New York: Springer-Verlag.Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Becomming a self regulated learner writer : A Socialcognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 22, 73-101.Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunck, D.H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning & Academic Achievement :Thoeritical Perspectives (2?? ed.) Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Elbaum. Associates Publisher.Zimmerman, B.J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. InM.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds) Handbook of Self- Regulation (pp 451-502)San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Zimmerman, B.J. (2000b). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice.(page14). Diperoleh Ogos 29, 2008 daripadahttp://www.findarticles.com/p/atricles/mi_mONQM/is_2_41/ai_90190493/pgZimmerman, B.J. (2000). Achieveing Academic Excellence. A self-Regulatoryperspective. En. M. Ferrari (Ed). The pursuit of excellence through education (pp 85-110).Mahuah. NJ:Erlbaum.Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students development of academicself-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.),Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp.139-164). United States of America. Diperolehi pada 18 Januari 2009 daripada http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME30/4/137.pdfZuraidi Wahid (2008). Kesan Penggunaan Modul Pembelajaran Regulasi Kendiri TerhadapMotivasi dan Pencapaian Pelajar bagi Tajuk Fotosintesis Biologi Tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjanayang tidak diterbitkan, Tanjong Malim: UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris.

Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)

相似書籍