The effects of badminton special speed training method toward success score and time perception predictive skills performance of badminton players
<p>Main aim of this study is to investigate the effects of badminton special speed training method (BSSTM) on Success Score (SS) and Time Perception Predictive Skills Performance (TPPSP) of landing of badminton players. Thirty badminton players were randomly divided into experimental g...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8572 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <p>Main aim of this study is to investigate the effects of badminton special speed training method (BSSTM) on Success Score (SS) and Time Perception Predictive Skills Performance (TPPSP) of landing of badminton players. Thirty badminton players were randomly divided into experimental group (G1) (n=15) and control group (G2) (n=15). The G1 adopted BSSTM, with G2 maintained badminton traditional speed training method (BTSTM). The intervention length was 3 months. Badminton serve machine was used to launch the shuttlecocks consistently, with stopwatch used for TPPSP. Between-group ANOVA for SS showed that between-subjects effects were reached at very significant level, that is F (5, 84) = .84, p = .01. The LSD for SS showed between G1 and G2 during pre-test was p = .93. The LSD for SS showed there were significant difference from G1 than G2 at posttest 1 (p = .03), during within G1 from posttest 1 to pre-test (p = .02), which was improvement effects during BSSTM toward SS. There was the retentive effects during BSSTM toward SS from within G1 posttest 1 to posttest 2 (p=.80). The TPPSP used MANOVA with Roys Largest Root showed that there is a very significant multivariate effect for TPPSP between G1 and G2, that is, F(5, 84)=11.28c, p =.000 < .001. LSD for TPPSP showed there were no significant difference following between G1 and G2 at pre-test (p >.05), and within G1 from posttest 1 to posttest 2 (p >.05), which was the retentive effect of BSSTM toward TPPSP. There were significant difference were following G1 than G2 during post-test 1 (p <.05), within G1 from pre-test to post-tests (p <.05), which was improvement effects during BSSTM toward TPPSP. It can be concluded that BSSTM showed superior training effect in comparison to BTSTM toward success score and time predictive of badminton landing.</p> |
|---|