Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah

<p>Beberapa kajian mendapati instruksi pengajaran melalui perisian aplikasi teknologi</p><p>maklumat dan komunikasi masih berpaksi pada pengajaran dan pembelajaran konvensional. Maka, kajian</p><p>ini bertujuan meningkatkan penggu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8668
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8668
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff
Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
description <p>Beberapa kajian mendapati instruksi pengajaran melalui perisian aplikasi teknologi</p><p>maklumat dan komunikasi masih berpaksi pada pengajaran dan pembelajaran konvensional. Maka, kajian</p><p>ini bertujuan meningkatkan penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam</p><p>Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah. Peserta kajian terdiri</p><p>daripada 34 orang murid sekolah rendah Tahap 2 dan lima (5) orang guru yang terlibat secara</p><p>langsung dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual di sekolah yang dipilih dalam</p><p>kajian ini. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melibatkan pemerhatian, temu bual, dan</p><p>hasil karya murid. Kaedah triangulasi digunakan untuk menganalisis data secara sepadu dan</p><p>meyakinkan. Integrasi pengumpulan data melalui temu bual disokong dengan data pemerhatian dan</p><p>diperkukuhkan dengan dokumentasi karya murid. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pembelajaran murid gaya</p><p>belajar visual meningkat berdasarkan hasil karya mereka yang menggunakan Modul Pembelajaran</p><p>Kendiri. Maka, modul berasaskan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi ini dapat membuka perspektif</p><p>baharu dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual dalam abad ke-21 di mana murid dapat mempelajari</p><p>subjek berkenaan secara visual dengan lebih berkesan lagi</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff
author_facet Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff
author_sort Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff
title Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
title_short Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
title_full Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
title_fullStr Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
title_full_unstemmed Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
title_sort penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pendidikan seni visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8668
_version_ 1776104552708177920
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:86682023-02-13 Penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah 2020 Siti Hayati Mohd Yusoff <p>Beberapa kajian mendapati instruksi pengajaran melalui perisian aplikasi teknologi</p><p>maklumat dan komunikasi masih berpaksi pada pengajaran dan pembelajaran konvensional. Maka, kajian</p><p>ini bertujuan meningkatkan penggunaan perisian aplikasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam</p><p>Pendidikan Seni Visual berasaskan gaya belajar visual di sekolah rendah. Peserta kajian terdiri</p><p>daripada 34 orang murid sekolah rendah Tahap 2 dan lima (5) orang guru yang terlibat secara</p><p>langsung dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual di sekolah yang dipilih dalam</p><p>kajian ini. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melibatkan pemerhatian, temu bual, dan</p><p>hasil karya murid. Kaedah triangulasi digunakan untuk menganalisis data secara sepadu dan</p><p>meyakinkan. Integrasi pengumpulan data melalui temu bual disokong dengan data pemerhatian dan</p><p>diperkukuhkan dengan dokumentasi karya murid. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pembelajaran murid gaya</p><p>belajar visual meningkat berdasarkan hasil karya mereka yang menggunakan Modul Pembelajaran</p><p>Kendiri. Maka, modul berasaskan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi ini dapat membuka perspektif</p><p>baharu dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual dalam abad ke-21 di mana murid dapat mempelajari</p><p>subjek berkenaan secara visual dengan lebih berkesan lagi</p> 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8668 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8668 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif <p>Abdul Rahim Abd Rashid. (2005). Profesionalisme keguruan prospek dan cabaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Abdul Rahim Hamdan & Ahmad Faizal Ayop. (2010). Kesesuaian isi kandungan, masa, kemudahan dan alatan dan kaedah tunjuk cara (demonstrasi) dalam mata pelajaran Kemahiran Teknikal peringkat menengah rendah dari perspektif guru-guru Kemahiran Hidup di sekolah menengah di Daerah Kluang. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. http://www.eprints.utm.my/10639/.</p><p>Abd. Rahman, Mohd. Anuar & Ahmad Kamar. (2011). Pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap guru penyelaras ICT di sekolah-sekolah rendah Zon Paloh, Kluang. Skudai Johor. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Adeyanju, J. L, .(1987). Creativity learning and learning styles. Isola Ola & Sons: Zaria.</p><p>Adkins, D. , & Brown-Syed, C. (2002, August). Accommodating all learners: Critical inquiry and learning styles in the LIS classroom. Paper presented at the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference Glasgow, Scotland.</p><p>Ahmad Fuad Othman (2003). Pendidik dan pendidikan di era digital: Pendekatan dan cabarannya. Wawasan: Pusat Sumber Pendidikan Negeri Kedah. Bil.17. Jun 2003. Bil.1</p><p>Al-Ansari, H. (2006). Internet use by the faculty members of Kuwait University. The Electronic Library Vol.24, No. (6), Pp; 791-803</p><p>Alhamd, Alotaibi, Motwaly, dan Zyadah (2004). Education in Saudi Arabia Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Alroshed press.</p><p>Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology 2(2): 118-134. Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p>Ambigapathy, P. dan Suthagar, N. (2003). Literasi teknologi komputer: persepsi dan penggunaan di kalangan guru. Di dalam Pandian, A. (ed.). Bahasa dan literasi: penyelidikan dan peninjauan untuk pendidikan. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Ambrose, S.A. & Lovett, M.C. (2014). Prior knowledge is more than content. Skills and beliefs also impact learning in Victor Benassi, Catherine Overson, and Christopher Hakala (Eds.). Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 7-19). American psychological association, division 2.</p><p>Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006</p><p>Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (Eds.) (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring, developing and assessing TPCK. New York, NY: Springer</p><p>Anis, S. K. (2010). Hubungan antara penglibatan dalam aktiviti praktikal, keupayaan visualisasi spatial dan pencapaian akademik dalam kalanganpelajar vokasional. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia : Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Teknikal.</p><p>A.W. Tony Bates. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. Routledge: Madison Ave, New York.</p><p>Armstrong, K. M & Yetter-Vessort, C. (1994). Transforming teaching through technology.</p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed). California: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.</p><p>Asmuni, A. M. (2008). Penggunaan komputer dalam Pendidikan Seni Visual. Kajian di tiga sekolah di negeri Perak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris :Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan Seni.</p><p>Aziz, H. (2003). Assure learning through the use of the ASSURE model. Retrieved October 10, 2009, from http://www.valenciacc.edu/oit/articles/articles_detail.cfm?ID=45</p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Asmah Suboh, Zurihanmi, & Fauziah Yahya (2005). Aplikasi kognitif dalam pendidikan. Bentong. Pahang: PTS Publishing Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Gooh Mo Lee, Halimah Maalip, Zahari Hamidon, Baharudin Arus, Gan Lui Nam (2013). Practice and level of reflectivity amongst student teachers of Universiti Sains Malaysia. European Journal of Scientific Research.</p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon dan Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Pts Professional.</p><p>Azura binti Mohd Nor & Sabariah binti Sharif (2014). Penggunaan Bahan Visual Di Kalangan Guru Teknikal. Universiti Sabah Malaysia.</p><p>Bada & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) Volume 5, Issue 6 Ver. I (Nov. -Dec. 2015), PP 66-70</p><p>Baharuddin Aris, Noraffandy Yahaya, Jamalludin Hj Harun dan Zaidatun Tasir. (2000). Teknologi pendidikan : Siri Modul Pembelajaran. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2011). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2014). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Pendidikan Seni Visual Tahun Lima. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia</p><p>Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe: European Schoolnet.</p><p>Becta (2004), What the research says about using ICT in Geography. Coventry: Becta</p><p>Benson, A. (2003). S2M2 design models. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/abenson/cohort4/Portfolio/models/t3_models.doc</p><p>Berg, E.V. (1988). The method and technique of teaching. London : Oxford University Press.</p><p>Bertoline, G. R. (1998). Visual science: An emerging discipline. Journal for geometry and graphics, 2(2), 181-187</p><p>Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J. & Ciganek, A.P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers and Education 58: 843-855.</p><p>Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1(1), 522. Retrieved from https://herdsa.org.au/herdsareview-higher-education-vol-1</p><p>Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5 (3), 235-245.</p><p>Blogbus.com. (2008). The ASSURE model. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://tstc-et.blogbus.com/logs/21760881.html</p><p>Boggs, B. (2007). What are some advantages and disadvantages of the ASSURE model and the ADDIE model? Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://leecountygradschool.wikispaces.com/file/view/Assignment+Worksheet+ 1+BBoggs+6025.doc.</p><p>Booth, D. (2013). The evolution of dimensional. Equius Partners, Inc. Asset Class Newsletter.</p><p>Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press</p><p>Burrell, M. (2009). ASSURE or ADDIE model for integrating instructional technology. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from http://www.oswego.edu/~burrell/addiemodel.htm</p><p>Buzan, T. (1991). Use both sides of your brain. New York: Plume.</p><p>Casey, M. B., Pezaris, E., & Nuttall, R. L. (1992). Spatial ability as a predictor of math achievement: The importance of sex and handedness patterns. Neuropsychologia, 30, 35-40</p><p>Cates, W.M. (1990). Panduan amali untuk penyelidikan pendidikan terjemahan Syaharom Abdullah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Cetin, A. (n.d) ASSURE model. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://www.metu.edu.tr/~e115199/ASSURE.doc</p><p>Chan, C. K. K. (2010). Understanding and fostering student thinking and learning for 21st</p><p>century education. In L.F. Zhang, D.A. Watkins & J.B.Biggs (eds), understanding the learning and developement of Asian students: What the 21st century teacher needs to think about. Singapore: Pearson Education.</p><p>Cohen, L., Marrion, L. (1980). Research methods in education. Mnneseota: Croom Helm Company Minneapolis.</p><p>Colin Rose, Malcoln. J Nicholl. (2002). Accelerated learning too the 21st century. Prime Book Box: Delacorte Press.</p><p>Comber, C., Lawson, T. and Hargreaves, L. (1998). From familiarisation to adaptation: Teachers responses to the introduction of ICT into the classroom. Proceedings of IN-TELE 98.</p><p>Cox, M. J., Preston, C., and Cox, K. (1999). What motivates teachers to use ICT? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference. Brighton: September</p><p>Cox, M., Preston, C., and Cox, K. (1999a). What factor support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Retrieved from: http://leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm</p><p>Creswell, John W. (1994). Research design. qualitative and quantitative approaches, Sage Publication, London.</p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.</p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2008). Education research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd.ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.</p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2008b). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p>Cresswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches: Sage Publications.</p><p>Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003. http://www.vvenkatesh.com/it/organizations/Theoretical_ Models.asp#Con=structdefs.</p><p>Davis, B.G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Inc.</p><p>Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.). Issues in Teaching using ICT(pp. 61-79). London: Routledge.</p><p>Desa, M.N., Sarkawi, S., Ibrahim, M. & Salleh, M.N. (2013). Technology pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among teachers trainees in University of Sultan Idris Education. National Proceeding Seminar ICT in Education. 81-86</p><p>Dick, W.,Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.</p><p>Diduck, A.P., A.J. Sinclair, G. Hostetler and P. Fitzpatrick. (2012). Transformasi learning theory, public involvement and natural resource and environmental management. Journal of environmental planning and management, 55 (10), 1311-1330</p><p>Dunn, R and Dunn, K. (1982). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing.</p><p>Efland, A. D. (1976). The school art style. Studies in art education, 17 (2).</p><p>Eisner, E.W. (2003). Arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.</p><p>Eisner, E. (2003). Artistry in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), pp. 373-384. Doi:10.1080/00313830308603. Factors that influence success among racial and ethnic minority college students in the STEM circuit. (2011). ASHE Higher Education Report, 36 (6), 53-85</p><p>Eisner, E. (2008). Arts and knowledge. In J.G. Knowles & A.L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspective, methodologies, examples, issues (pp.3-12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.</p><p>Elbaum, B., & Vaughn, S. (2001). School-based interventions to enhance the self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101(3), 303329. https://doi.org/10.1086/499670</p><p>Faezah Abd. Ghani dan Mazlan Aris. (2012). Pembinaan, kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan modul kemahiran mengawal stress kehidupan guru.</p><p>Field, A.P. (2009). Discovering statistic using SPSS (3rd ed). Los Angeles, CA:SAGE.</p><p>Fink, Arlene. (2010). 3rd edition conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p>Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012).How to design and evaluate research in education (8th.ed.).New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Gabare, C.Gabarre, S.Rosseni, Parilah Mohd Shah & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2014). iPads in the foreign language classroom: A learners perspective. The Southest Asian Journal of English Language Studies 20(1):115-128</p><p>Gagne, C.L., & Shoben, E.J. (1997).Influence of discourse context on feature availability in conceptual combination. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory and cognition, 23, 71-87</p><p>Galvez, R. (2018). Effectiveness of animated visuals for the teaching of chemical bonding in junior high school chemistry. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/January2018/11.pdf</p><p>Geisert, P., & Futrell, M. (1995). Teachers, computer, and curriculum microcomputers in the classroom. U.S.A: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Ghafar, M. N. A. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Johor Darul Ta'zim: UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Amla, S. (2012). Management strategies for E-learning systemas the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis. Life Science Journal, 9 (3), 2190-2196</p><p>Ghavifekr, S., Ahmad Zabidi A. R., Muhammad Faizal A. G., Ng Y. R., Yao M., & Zhang ,T. (2014). ICT integration in education: Incorporation for teaching and learning improvement. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 24-46</p><p>Giam Kah How. (1999/2000). Appreciation, learning styles and use of multimedia in teaching and learning. Department of Science and Mathematics, MPSK. Jurnal Pendidikan Tiga ENF 1999/2000. 2 (3)</p><p>Gilakjani A.P, Ahmadi, S.M. (2011). Paper title: The effect of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on language teaching. International conference on social science and humanity, 5, 496-472</p><p>Gilakjani, P. A. (2012). Visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2, (1).</p><p>Gomes, C. (2005). Integration of ICT in science teaching: A study performed in Azores, Portugal. Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies.</p><p>Govindasamy T,. (2002). Successfull implementation of a learning pedagogical considerations. Internet and higher education 4, 287-299</p><p>Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R. M. (2007). What is instructional design? In Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (eds.), trends and issues in instructional design and technology(pp.10-16). Upper saddle River, NJ: Pearson.</p><p>Halimah Harun. (2006). Minat, Motivasi dan Kemahiran Mengajar Guru Pelatih. Jurnal Pendidikan 31 (2006) 83 96</p><p>Haliza bt Sainan, Nenly Marudi & Aidah bt Sulaiman. (2012). Teknologi makumat ICThttp://www.kumpulan/kawan.blogspot.com/p/test.html 12 April 2012.</p><p>Haliza Hamzah, J.N. (2016). Pengurusan bilik darjah dan tingkah laku. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.). Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99-108). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.</p><p>Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2012). Testing an instrument using structured interviews to assess experienced teachers TPACK. Paper presented at the Teacher Education Faculty Proceedings & Presentations, University of Nebraska, Omaha. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&contex t=tedfacproc</p><p>Harun, J., & Tasir, Z. (2003). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributors</p><p>Heinemann. Galvez, R. (2018). Effectiveness of animated visuals for the teaching of chemical bonding in Junior High School Chemistry. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/2018/January2018/11.pdf</p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J.D., Smaldino, S.E. (1999). Instructional media. and technologies for learning (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J.D. (1993). Instructional media. and the new technologies of instruction, 3rd Ed. New York, N.Y: Macmillan Publishing Company.</p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. & Smaldino, S.E. (2012). Instructional media and technologies for learning. (10th ed.). New Jersey: Merill Prentice Hall.</p><p>Henri Lefebvre. (2006). A critical introduction. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. NY.</p><p>Ingham, P., & Greer, R.D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153-164</p><p>J. Buttler. Biggs. (1993). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 319.</p><p>Jassie Sam. (2004). Intergrasi teknologi komputer dalam pengajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual. Sekolah Menengah. (Master's).Universiti Malaya: Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Jaya Kumar C. Koran. (2001). Aplikasi e-learning dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran di sekolah-sekolah Malaysia: Cadangan pelaksanaan pada senario masa kini. Pasukan Projek Rintis Sekolah Bestari. Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Johari Bin Hassan & Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (2008). Halangan terhadap penggunaan komputer dan ICT di dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (P&P) di kalangan guru di sekolah menengah kebangsaan luar bandar di Daerah Kulai Jaya, Johor.</p><p>John Willey & Sons. Inc. Siti Norazlina. (2008). Halangan terhadap penggunaan komputer dan ICT di dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran di kalangan guru di SMK luar bandar di daerah Kulai Jaya, Johor. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Johnson, L., Adams, S. & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.</p><p>Jones, A. J. and Gardner, C. (1999). Student learning: linking research and practice. In: Stripling, B. K., Learning and Libraries in an Information Age. Principles and Practice. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.</p><p>Jamaludin Ahmad. (2002). Kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan keberkesanan Modul Program Maju Diri ke atas motivasi pencapaian di kalangan pelaja-pelajar sekolah menengah negeri Selangor. Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Serdang: UPM</p><p>Jou, M., & Wang, J. (2013). Investigation of effects of virtual reality environments on learning performance of technical skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2), 433-438.</p><p>Juriah Long. (1998). Pengajaran Bahasa Melayu secara interaktif. dlm. Juriah Long (Eds). Inovasi dalam pengkaedahan pengajaran bahasa, sains sosial dan teknologi maklumat. Bangi: UKM.</p><p>Josi, JS & Patankar, PS. (2016). Use of constructivist pedagogy in science education. Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (AIIRJ).</p><p>Kalyuga, S., A. & Lovett, M.C. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31</p><p>Keinanen, M., Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2000). Teaching cognitive skill through dance: Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 295306</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Pelan induk pembangunan pendidikan 20132025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Preliminary Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kewangan, K. (2014). Maklum balas ke atas laporan ketua audit negara 2013 (Siri 3 Tahun 2013).</p><p>KPM. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: KementerianPelajaran Malaysia.</p><p>KPM. (2017). Dokumentasi kajian dan laporan pemantauan. Edisi muatnaik portal BTP.</p><p>Kirschner. P.A., & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2013). Educational psychologist, 48 (April 2015), 169-183. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.804395</p><p>Kishore. N.(2003). Educational technology. Abhishek publication.</p><p>Krahenbuhl, KS. (2016). Student centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The clearing house: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, Vol. 0, No.0, 1-9 2016</p><p>Kumar Raman, Norasmah Othman, Haryati Mohd Affandi. (2019). Jurang penggunaan teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (TMK) antara sekolah bandar dan luar bandar (information communication and technology (ICT) usage gaps between urban and rural schools). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia: UKM.</p><p>Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. (2018). Pendidikan Kesenian Tahun Empat. DSKP. KPM.</p><p>Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. (2014). Pendidikan Seni Visual Tahun Lima. DSKP. KPM.</p><p>Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah. (2011). Buku panduan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi Merentas Kurikulum. KPM.</p><p>Lambert, J. & Cuper, P. (2008). Multimedia technologies and familiar spaces: 21stcentury teaching for 21st-century learners. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 8(3).</p><p>Larson, M.B., and B.B. Lockee. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York: Routledge.</p><p>Lefebvre, S., Deaudelin, D., & Loiselle, J. (2006). ICT implementation stages of primary school teachers: The practices and conceptions of teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education National Conference, Adelaide, Australia.</p><p>Lewis, B. (2012). Visual learning. Retrieved from About.com: http://k6educators.about.com/od/educationglossary</p><p>Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.</p><p>Lim, S. C. (2005). Web learning: Effects of constructivists approach than a direct approach to the science and high-level of thinking skills. Masters diss.,</p><p>Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p>Linn & Miller. (2005). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 10th Edition. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.</p><p>Mahmud, R. & Ismail, M.A. (2010). Impact of training and experience in using ICT on in-service teachers basic ICT literacy. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology 10(2): 5-10</p><p>Maor, D., & Fraser, B. (1996). Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry-based computer-assisted learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 401-421.</p><p>Maor, D. (2003). Teachers and students perspectives on online learning in a social constructivist learning environment. Technology, pedagogy and education, 12(2), 201-218.</p><p>Maor, D. (2008). Changing relationship: who is the learner and who is the teacher in the online educational landscape? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (5), 627-638 http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/maor.pdf</p><p>Marohaini Yusoff. (2001).Penyelidikan Kualitatif Pengalaman Kerja Lapangan Kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge in elementary mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.</p><p>Marshall, C. & Rosmann, G.B. (2011).Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.</p><p>McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge</p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2012). Education research: Fundamentals for the consumer.Boston,MA: Pearson Education.</p><p>McMohan, J., Gardner, J., Gray, C. and Mulhern, G. (1999). Barrier to Computer Usage: Staff and Student Perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 15: 56-68.</p><p>Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implement San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Mastuti, I & Aziah, S. (2011). The New Meaning of Education Change Kuala Lumpur: National Translation Institute of Malaysia.</p><p>Mattar,Joao.(2018).Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED. Revista Iberoamericanade Educacia Distancia, vol. 21, no. 2, 2018</p><p>Mawson, B. (2003). Beyondthe design process: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.</p><p>Mazanah & Adanan. (2004). Motif utama guru melanjutkan pelajaran dan tahap motivasi terhadap program pengajian. Pertanika Journal 12(2): 163-171</p><p>Mc.Kim,R.H. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking, 2nd edition. California; Dale Seymour Publications.</p><p>McSherry, K. (2005). ASSURE sample lesson plan. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://ux1.eiu.edu/~arthomas/word%20files/ASSURE_Katie.doc</p><p>Michael Fullan, Joanne Quinn, Joanne McEachen. (2017). New pedagogy for deep learning: Sage Publications Inc.</p><p>Miles dan Huberman . A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). London: Sage Publications.</p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013a). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf</p><p>Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054</p><p>Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017 1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684</p><p>Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017-1054</p><p>Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2008). Education technology and teacher education, the TPACK framework. A symposium on education and technology in schools.</p><p>Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.</p><p>MoCT (2003). National information and communications technologies policy, Ministry of Communication and Transport, The United Republic of Tanzania, Dares Salaam. Newhouse, P. (2002). Literature review: The impact of ICT on learning and teaching, Perth, Western Australia: Department of Education.</p><p>Mohd Aizat Abu Hassan. (2016). Masalah guru dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual. Kuala Lumpur: Sekolah Kebangsaan Batu Muda.</p><p>Mohd. Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.</p><p>Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. ms 45-100</p><p>Mohd Razali, S. (2007). Keberkesanan penggunaan koswer animasi grafik di kalangan pelajar teknikal yang berbeza tahap visualisasi. Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana</p><p>Moore, C. D. (2005). Is ICT being used to its potential to improve teaching and learning across the curriculum? Retrieved from http://www.teacherresearch.net.</p><p>Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A. & Moghadam, D.K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education 61(0): 158-167</p><p>Mohd. Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan. pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: DBP</p><p>Mohammad Mohsin Mohamad Said & Nasruddin Yunos. (2008). Peranan guru dalam memupuk kreativiti pelajar. Jurnal Pengajian Umum Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bil. 9:58-71</p><p>Mohd Safarin Nordin et al. (2007). Kesan penggunaan bongkah 3-Dimensi dalam pengajaran ke atas kemahiran visualisasi pelajar aliran teknikal sekolah menengah teknik. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Morrison, JA, dan Estes, JC. (2007).Using scientist and real-world scenario in professional development for middle school science teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 18 (2): 165-184</p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</p><p>Muhammad Sukri, S., & Lee, M. F. (2007). Hubungan antara kognitif visual dengan pencapaian lukisan kejuruteraan di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah teknik. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention Proceeding. Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, Senai.</p><p>Muller, N. (2005). ASSURE lesson plan on the giver: A Novel by Lois Lowry. Th eperfect society. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://www.nelliemuller.com/assure.instructional.unit.the.giver.htm</p><p>Mustafa, A.H.M., Ismail, M.A. & Noh, M.N. (2016). Demographic factors behind the pedagogical levels of teacher content (TPCK): One overview: National Proceeding Seminar ICT in Education.151-166</p><p>Nazirah Mat Sin, Othman Talib, Tengku Putri Norishah, Adura Azlin Ishak, and Roselan Baki. (2014).Male students and digital game: Reason, motivation and feeling.International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, February 2014.</p><p>Newhouse, P. (2002). Literatu rereview: The impact of ICT on learning and teaching. Perth, Western Australia:Department of Education.</p><p>Noor Azean & Beatrice. (2010). Penggunaan ICT dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Sejauhmana ia meningkat kemahiran generik guru pelatih. UTM: tidak diterbitkan.</p><p>Noraini Mohamed Noh, Hani Meryleina Ahmad Mustafa & Che Nidzam Che Ahmad. (2013). Predictive relationship between technology acceptance readiness and the intention to use Malaysian EduwebTV among library and media teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science.</p><p>Nordin, M. K., Hamid M. Z., Muhammad Sukri Saud, M. S., Bakar, Z. A. & Razak,D.</p><p>A. (2010). Kemahiran visualisasi dan gaya pembelajaran pelajar pelajar sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Johor Bahru dalam matapelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.</p><p>Noriati A.Rashid, Boon Pong Ying, Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad, Wan KamaruddinWan Hassan. (2009). Teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Norizan Abdul Razak & Sallehuddin Abdul Rashid. (1997). Pengajaran bahasa berbantukan komputer. Satu tinjauan terhadap kesediaan guru-guru sekolah menengah di Malaysia. UKM:Bangi.</p><p>Nor Fadzleen SaDon, Halina Mohamed Dahlan & Haliza Zainal. (2013). Derivation for design of Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) framework for Malaysian schools. 3rd International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS, (November), 570575. Doi:10.1109/ ICRIIS.2013.6716772</p><p>Nurul Ezzati Azizi & Halimah Maalip. (2011). Perbandingan faktor yang mempengaruhi proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran antara sekolah di bandar dan luar bandar. Journal of Education Management 1: 31-47.</p><p>Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2008). Isu-isu kritikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Omar Abdull Kareem, Khuan Wai Bing (2005). Perkembangan Profesional Guru Secara Berterusan: Perspektif Pembangunan Sumber Manusia : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan</p><p>Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. London: Future lab.</p><p>Osman M. and H. Ahmed. (2003). Web assisted instruction: Its potentials and impact on students learning and attitudes. Paper presented at the conference of the Centre for Educational Technology (ETEX2003), Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate of Oman.</p><p>Othman Lebar. (2009). Penyelidikan kualitatif. Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod. Tanjung Malim:Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual (Edisi ke-3.). Berksire, United Kingdom: Open University Press.</p><p>Paradesa, R. (2015). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis mahasiswa melalui pendekatan konstruktivisme pada mata kuliah matematika keuangan. Jurnal Pendidikan MatematikaRAFA, 1 (2), 306-325</p><p>Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.</p><p>Pei, O.S. & Piaw, C.Y. (2017). Principal E-Leadership practices and teacher attitude toward using the Frog VLE. PEMIMPIN (The Leader) 12: 12</p><p>Piaget(1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge.</p><p>Pittard V., B. Phil and D. Jessica. (2003). The big picture: ICT and attainment, motivation and learning. Department for education and skills. https://www.education .gov.uk.</p><p>Pitts, B., Vanessa, R., & Mariano, G. J. (2013). Snapshots of student thinking: An exploration of video cases for extending prospective teachers knowledge. Action in Teacher Education, 35(5-6), 430444. doi:10.1080/01626620.2013.846760</p><p>Rashidi Azizan dan Abdul Razak Habib. (1995). Pengajaran dalam bilik darjah, kaedah dan strategi. Kajang: Masa Enterprise.</p><p>Robertson, C,.Cowell, B. and Olson, J. (1998). A case study of integration and destreaming: Teachers and students in an Ontario school respond. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30 (6), 691-717</p><p>Robiah Sidin, and Nor Sakinah Mohamad. (2007). ICT dalam pendidikan: prospek dan cabaran dalam pembaharuan pedagogi. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 32 . pp. 139-152. ISSN 0126-6020 / 2180-0782</p><p>Robiatul Adawiyah Saad. (2015). Pembangunan modal insan melalui pendidikan. Diakses pada 20 Ogos 2016 dari artikel pembangunan modal insan melalui pendidikan.</p><p>Romai Nor Rabbu. (2003). Implementation of teacher english language training for math and science subject. Paper presented in a forum in Pulau Pinang Malaysia 2003.</p><p>Ronald R.Schmeck. (1998). Learning strategies and learning styles. Publisher: Springer US.</p><p>Rose, S. E., & Jolley, R. P. (2016). Drawing development in mainstream and Waldorf Steiner schools revisited. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 10(4), 447457</p><p>Russell, J.D. (1974). Modular instructions. A guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular materials. Minneapolis: Minnesota Burgess Publishing Company.</p><p>Rozinah Jamaludin. (2005). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Rozmi Bin Ismail. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan teori dan praktis.Selangor DarulIhsan:Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Rusmini Ku Ahmad. (2012). Integrasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. 10 April 2012.</p><p>Saamad Mohd Rasdi. (2003). The readiness of primary school teachers implement the changes the language of teaching instruction in science and mathematics. Masters project of education paper, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Sager, A. (2001). Evaluation of educational software for high school students in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished masters thesis, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p><p>Sancar-Tokmak, H. (2015). Pre-service teachers perceptions on TPACK development after designing educational games. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 392410. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2014.939611</p><p>Sang. (2010). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (J Comput Assist Learn).</p><p>Sang, G., Martin, V., Johan, V.B., & Jo, T. (2010). Student teachers thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviours with educational technology. Computers & education, 54(1):103-112, doi:10,1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010</p><p>Scheiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston: Addison Wesley.</p><p>Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 12(3). doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544</p><p>Schneider, K. Schlegel, H.G. (1984). New concepts in neoplasia as applied to diagnostic pathology: International Academy of Pathology. International Congress.</p><p>Shahabuddin, Rohazani dan Mohd Zohir .(2007). Pedagogi: Strategi dan teknik mengajar dengan berkesan. PTS Professional Publishing Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Shaharuddin Md Salleh, Zaidatun Tasir & Baharuddin Aris. (2007). Simulation through web: student perceptions towards WWWS learning. Smart Teaching & Learning: Re-engineering ID, Utilization and Innovation of Technology, 1. pp. 336-346. ISSN 983-42733-2-3 http://eprints.utm.my/5972/1/46-shaharudin.pdf</p><p>Sharifah Alwiyah Alsagoff. (1986). Ilmu Pendidikan Pedagogi. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Education Book (ASIA) Ltd.</p><p>Sharifah Nor Puteh, and Kamarul Azman Abd Salam. (2011). Tahap kesediaan penggunaan ICT dalam pengajaran dan kesannya terhadap hasil kerja dan tingkah laku murid prasekolah (Level of readiness in using ICT for teaching and its effect on the work and behaviour of preschool pupils). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia: 36 (1). pp. 25-34. ISSN 0126-6020 / 2180-0782</p><p>Shepard, R. N. (1978). The Mental Image. American psychologist, 33(2), 125-137</p><p>Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 121. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah. ((2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan. Falsafah, teori dan praktis. Serdang: UPM.</p><p>Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thounsand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p>Singh, Y.k (2005). Instructional technology in education. Published by Darya ganj New Delhi</p><p>Singh. S & Yaduvanshi. S.(2015). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume5,Issue3,March2015 ISSN 22503153</p><p>Slavin, Robert E. (2005). Cooperative learning: London. Allymand Bacon.</p><p>Slavin, Robert E. (2005). Educational psychology theory and practice: Pearson Education.</p><p>Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L., & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning, 9th Ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p>Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design and Graphics Journal, 63(2), 21-32</p><p>Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459480</p><p>Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (2000). A national plan for improving professional development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.</p><p>Straessle, J. M. W. (2014). Teachers' perspectives of effective lesson planning: A comparative analysis (Doctoral dissertation). The College of William and Mary in Virginia, Williamsburg, VA, USA. (Order No. 3580433)</p><p>Stake, R.E. (2000).Case studies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-453).Thousand Oaks: Sage.</p><p>Stake, R.E. (2006).Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.</p><p>Strong, S., & Smith, R. (2002). Spatial visualization: Fundamentals and trends in Engineering Graphics. Journalof Industrial Technology. 18(1), 2-6</p><p>Su Luan, Wong, Sidek Abdul Aziz, Aida Suraya Mohd Yunus, Zakaria Sidek, Kamariah Abu Bakar dan Hamidah Maseran. (2005). Gender Differences in ICT Competencies among Academicians at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology 2(3): 62-69</p><p>Surif, J., Ibrahim, N.H. & Hassan, R.A. (2015). Tahap amalan dan pengintegrasian ICT dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains. Sains Humanika 2(4)</p><p>Sutherland, R., V. Armstrong, S. Barnes, R. Brawn, N. Breeze, M. Gall, S. Matthewman, F. Olivero, A. Taylor, P. Triggs, J. Wishart, and P. John. (2004). Transforming teaching and learning: Embedding ICT into everyday classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20: 413425</p><p>Syed Ismail Syed Mustapa, & Ahmad Subki Miskon. (2010). Asas kepimpinan & perkembangan profesional (edisi keempat). Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Tai, S. J. D., & Crawford, D. (2014). Conducting classroom observations to understand TPACK: Moving beyond self-reported data. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 26612664). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/131189</p><p>Teo. T. (2006). Attitudes towards computers: A study of post-secondary student in Singapore. Interactive Learning Environment. 14(1): 17-24</p><p>Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers and Education, 52(2), 302-312</p><p>Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).Computers & Education, 53(3),1000-1009</p><p>Termit, K. & Noorma, H. (2015). Teachers readiness to utilize frog VLE: A case study of a Malaysian secondary school. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science 5(1): 20-29. Doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2015/11965</p><p>Tindall, J.A &Black, D.R. (2009). Peer programs and in depth look at peer programs. Planning, implementation, and administration. Second edition. Taylor & Francis Group, New York.</p><p>Tucker, A. (2005a). Assure lesson plan number 1: Learning about plane shapes. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://ahtucker.com/documents/geomprojplan1.doc.</p><p>Tuckman, B.W. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers and education, 39, 261-269</p><p>Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14 (5), 216-223. doi:10.1108/09513540010344731</p><p>Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Nordin. (1993).Wawasan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Nurin Enterprise</p><p>Wang, W.T. & Wang. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning system. Computers & Education 53: 761-774</p><p>Ward, J. & Peppard, J. (2003). Strategic planning for information systems, 3rd edition. Chichester; John Wiley and sons.</p><p>Williams, R,. (2009). Visual learning theory. http://www.aweoregon.org/research_theory.html.</p><p>WL Bennet. (1990). Digital media and the personalization of contentious: Segerberg Information.</p><p>Yelland, N. (2001). Teaching and learning with information and communication technologies (ICT) for numeracy in the early childhood and primary years of schooling. Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.</p><p>Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.</p><p>Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.</p><p>Yusup Hashim & Razmah Man. (2006). Teknologi instruksional: Teori dan aplikasi.Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Zoraini Wati Abas. (1993). Komputer dan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti.</p>