Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat
<p>Kajian berbentuk kuasi eksperimen ini dilaksanakan bertujuan untuk</p><p>membangunkan dan menilai keberkesanan Video Assisted Electrochemistry</p><p>Learning Aids (VAELA) ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Modul ini...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8735 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8735 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
QD Chemistry |
| spellingShingle |
QD Chemistry Khairunnisa Darus Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| description |
<p>Kajian berbentuk kuasi eksperimen ini dilaksanakan bertujuan untuk</p><p>membangunkan dan menilai keberkesanan Video Assisted Electrochemistry</p><p>Learning Aids (VAELA) ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Modul ini</p><p>dibina menggunakan reka bentuk instruksional Model ADDIE yang mengandungi</p><p>lima fasa iaitu analisis, reka bentuk, pembangunan, pelaksanan penilaian. VAELA</p><p>turut dibina berdasarkan Teori Konstruktivisme dan Teori Kognitif Pembelajaran</p><p>Multimedia bagi memastikan modul yang terhasil adalah berkualiti. Responden</p><p>kajian terdiri daripada 72 pelajar tingkatan empat dibahagikan secara sama rata</p><p>kepada kumpulan kawalan dan kumpulan rawatan. Instrumen yang digunakan</p><p>untuk menilai tahap pencapaian pelajar adalah pra ujian dan pasca ujian pencapaian</p><p>elektrokimia. Tahap motivasi pelajar diukur dengan menggunakan pra dan pasca</p><p>soal selidik motivasi. Analisis ujian t menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan dalam skor pascaujian pencapaian elektrokimia antara kumpulan yang</p><p>menggunakan VAELA dan kumpulan yang menggunakan kaedah tradisional.</p><p>analisis ANOVA menunjukkan tiada kesan interaksi yang signifikan antara</p><p>kumpulan dan tahap motivasi yang berbeza dalam ujian pasca motivasi terhadap</p><p>ujian pencapaian elektrokimia dan Tuckey HSD Pos Hoc menunjukkan terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan antara ketiga-tiga tahap motivasi ke atas pencapaian</p><p>pelajar apabila menggunakan VAELA. Perbandingan skor pra soal selidik motivasi</p><p>dengan skor pasca soal selidik motivasi bagi kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan apabila dianalisis menggunakan ujian t. Kesimpulannya,</p><p>penggunaan VAELA berupaya untuk meningkatkan pencapaian dan tahap motivasi</p><p>pelajar dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia. Implikasinya, kajian ini memberi</p><p>sumbangan dalam pendidikan kimia sebagai salah satu aktiviti pembelajaran abad</p><p>ke-21.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Khairunnisa Darus |
| author_facet |
Khairunnisa Darus |
| author_sort |
Khairunnisa Darus |
| title |
Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| title_short |
Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| title_full |
Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| title_fullStr |
Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| title_sort |
pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan vaela bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8735 |
| _version_ |
1776104560358588416 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:87352023-03-03 Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan VAELA bagi tajuk elektrokimia ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar tingkatan empat 2022 Khairunnisa Darus QD Chemistry <p>Kajian berbentuk kuasi eksperimen ini dilaksanakan bertujuan untuk</p><p>membangunkan dan menilai keberkesanan Video Assisted Electrochemistry</p><p>Learning Aids (VAELA) ke atas pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar. Modul ini</p><p>dibina menggunakan reka bentuk instruksional Model ADDIE yang mengandungi</p><p>lima fasa iaitu analisis, reka bentuk, pembangunan, pelaksanan penilaian. VAELA</p><p>turut dibina berdasarkan Teori Konstruktivisme dan Teori Kognitif Pembelajaran</p><p>Multimedia bagi memastikan modul yang terhasil adalah berkualiti. Responden</p><p>kajian terdiri daripada 72 pelajar tingkatan empat dibahagikan secara sama rata</p><p>kepada kumpulan kawalan dan kumpulan rawatan. Instrumen yang digunakan</p><p>untuk menilai tahap pencapaian pelajar adalah pra ujian dan pasca ujian pencapaian</p><p>elektrokimia. Tahap motivasi pelajar diukur dengan menggunakan pra dan pasca</p><p>soal selidik motivasi. Analisis ujian t menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan dalam skor pascaujian pencapaian elektrokimia antara kumpulan yang</p><p>menggunakan VAELA dan kumpulan yang menggunakan kaedah tradisional.</p><p>analisis ANOVA menunjukkan tiada kesan interaksi yang signifikan antara</p><p>kumpulan dan tahap motivasi yang berbeza dalam ujian pasca motivasi terhadap</p><p>ujian pencapaian elektrokimia dan Tuckey HSD Pos Hoc menunjukkan terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan antara ketiga-tiga tahap motivasi ke atas pencapaian</p><p>pelajar apabila menggunakan VAELA. Perbandingan skor pra soal selidik motivasi</p><p>dengan skor pasca soal selidik motivasi bagi kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan apabila dianalisis menggunakan ujian t. Kesimpulannya,</p><p>penggunaan VAELA berupaya untuk meningkatkan pencapaian dan tahap motivasi</p><p>pelajar dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia. Implikasinya, kajian ini memberi</p><p>sumbangan dalam pendidikan kimia sebagai salah satu aktiviti pembelajaran abad</p><p>ke-21.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8735 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8735 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abd. Aziz Kulop Saad & Azlinda Ahamad. (2000). Keberkesanan penggunaan bahan pengajaran multimedia</p><p>interaktif (BPMI) dalam pengajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid. (2001). Kesan pendekatan pengajaran sistemik terhadap peningkatan</p><p>penguasaan perbendaharaan kata dan pemahaman murid-murid yang menghadapi masalah membaca di sekolah</p><p>rendah luar bandar. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Acar, B. & Tarhan, L. (2007). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students understanding</p><p>of concepts in electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5,</p><p>349-373.</p><p></p><p>Adams, D.J. (2009). Current trends in laboratory class teaching in university bioscience</p><p>programmes. Bioscience Education, 13(3).</p><p></p><p>Ainon Mohd. (2003). Teori Motivasi di Tempat Kerja. Bentong: Pts Publictions & Disrtibutor Sdn.</p><p>Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development.</p><p>Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Alias Baba. (1999). Statistik penyelidikan dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial. Bangi: Universiti</p><p>Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Al-Balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-Shuaili, A. H., & Taylor, N. (2012). Omani twelfth grade</p><p>students most common misconceptions in chemistry. Science Education International, 23(3), 221240.</p><p></p><p>Amine, B. M., Benachaiba,C., & Guemide, B. (2012). Using multimedia to motivate students in EFL</p><p>Classrooms: a case study of English masters students at Jijel University, Algeria. Malaysian</p><p>Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 63-81.</p><p></p><p>Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural</p><p>contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 354359.</p><p></p><p>Arlina, G. (2006). Modul MD-03 menjadi termotivasi untuk belajar. Basic Study Skills, 1-14.</p><p></p><p>Asal, V., & Kratoville, J. (2013). Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the</p><p>Pedagogy of IR Simulations Through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens. Journal of Political</p><p>Science Education, 9(2), 132143.</p><p></p><p>Ashfahani Zakaria, Amla Mohd Salleh, Mohd Arif Ismail & Ghavifekr, S. (2015). Promoting meaningful</p><p>learning via online project-based module. Meaningful Learning, 2-15.</p><p></p><p>Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Mohd Amaluddin Yusoff & Naing Win Oo. (2009). A Comparative Study between</p><p>Traditional Learning and E-Learning. Teaching and Learning Open</p><p>Forum 2009, 1-7.</p><p></p><p>Awanbor, D. (2005).Credentialing Process In The Nigerian Education System. European</p><p>Journal of Educational Studies.1(3).</p><p></p><p>Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., & Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When</p><p>instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in</p><p>Human Behavior, 25, 348353.</p><p></p><p>Azizi Yahya dan Jaafar Sidek. (2006). Siri kaunseling: Membentuk identiti remaja. Bentong:</p><p>PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Azlina Mohd Kosnin. (2007), Self-regulated learning and academic acheivement inMalaysian</p><p>undergraduates. International Education Journal, 8, 221-228.</p><p></p><p>Baharuddin Aris, Rio Sumarni Shariffudin & Manimegalai Subramaniam. (2002). Reka</p><p>bentuk perisian multimedia. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (2001). Social Theory: Aagentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52,</p><p>126</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.</p><p></p><p>Barral, F. L., Fernandez, E. G. & Otero, J. R. G. (1992). Secondary Students Interpretation</p><p>of the Process Occuring in an Electrochemical Cell. Journal of Chemical Educati, 69</p><p>(8), 655 657.</p><p></p><p>Baylor, A. L. (2005). The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes.</p><p>Proceedings of Workshop on Affective Interactions: Computers in the Affective Loop,</p><p>International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, 2005.</p><p></p><p>Bayman, P. & Mayer, R.E. (1988). Using conceptual models to teach BASIC computer</p><p>programming. Journal of Education Psychology, 80(3), 291 298.</p><p></p><p>Beal, C. R., & Stevens, R. H. (2011). Improving students problem solving in a web-based</p><p>chemistry simulation through embedded metacognitive messages. Technology,</p><p>Instrumentation, Cognition and Learning, 8(3), 255-271.</p><p></p><p>Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., and</p><p>Sommer, M. O. A. (2014). Improving Biotech Education through Gamified Laboratory</p><p>Simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32 (7), 694697.</p><p></p><p>Bong, A. Y. L., & Lee. T. T. (2016). Form four students misconceptions in electrolysis of</p><p>molten compounds and aqueous solutions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning &</p><p>Teaching, 17(1), 157184.</p><p></p><p>Bonser, S. P., De Permentier, P., Green, J., Velan, G. M., Adam, P., & Kumar, R. K. (2013).</p><p>Engaging students by emphasizing botanical concepts over techniques: Innovative</p><p>practical exercises using virtual microscopy. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2),</p><p>123- 127.</p><p></p><p>Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of</p><p>virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices.</p><p>Research in Learning Technology, 25, 120.</p><p></p><p>Boyle, T. (2002). Towards a theoretical base for educational multimedia design. Journal of</p><p>Interactive Media in Education, 2.</p><p></p><p>British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2003) Primary schools Ict and</p><p>standards.</p><p></p><p>Butler, D.L. (2002). Individualizing instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice,</p><p>41(2), 81-92.</p><p></p><p>Che Suriani Kiflee & Fariza Khalid. (2014). Keberkesanan Kaedah Multimedia dalam Pengajarandan</p><p>Pembelajaran Terhadap Pelajar-Pintar. International Seminar on Global Education II: Education</p><p>Transformation towards a Developed Nation. (pp. 135-159). Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM</p><p></p><p></p><p>Cher, G. C. (2004). Meninjau Kerangka Alternatif Terhadap Konsep Asas Elektrokimia Di Kalangan</p><p>Pealjar Yang Pernah Mempelajari Tajuk Elektrokimia. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris: Tesis</p><p>Sarjana Muda.</p><p></p><p>Chiu, M., & Wu, H. (2009). The roles of multimedia in the teaching and learning of the triplet</p><p>relationship in chemistry. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representations in</p><p>Chemical Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education 4 (pp. 251283). Dordrecht: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Choo, W. O. & Halimah Badioze Zaman (2002). Penggunaan pakej perisian system papan cerita</p><p>berelektronik dalam pembinaan kandungan perisian pendidikan multimedia. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 15,</p><p>374 6.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Yan Piau. (2006), Kaedah Penyelidikan Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill. Clarebout, G.,</p><p>Elen, J., Johnson, W.L. & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents: An</p><p>Opportunity to be Grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 267-286.</p><p></p><p>Clarebout, G. & Elen, J. (2007). In Search of Pedagogical Agents' Modality and Dialogue Effects in</p><p>Open Learning Environments.</p><p>http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ejist/docs/vol10_no1/papers/full_papers/clarebout_elen. pdf [10 Mei</p><p>2013].</p><p></p><p>Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). e-Learning and the science of instruction: PfeifferSan</p><p>Francisco.</p><p></p><p>Clark, M. H., & Shadish, W. R. (2007). Quasi-Experimental Method. Encyclopedia of</p><p>Measurement and Statistics, 806-809. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven</p><p>guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer/John</p><p>Wiley & Sons . San Francisco.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson</p><p>Education, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Dahlqvist, P. (2000). Animations in Physics Learning. Association for the Advancement of</p><p>Computing in Education (AACE).</p><p></p><p>Darrah, M., R. Humbert, J. Finstein, M. Simon, and J. Hopkins. (2014). Are Virtual Labs as</p><p>Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two</p><p>Major Universities. Journal of Science Education andTechnology, 23, 803814.</p><p></p><p>Deng, X., W. J. Doll, & D. Truong. (2004). The Determinants and Consequences of</p><p>Computer Self-Efficacy in an Ongoing Use Context. Behavior & Information</p><p>Technology, (23) 6, 395-412.</p><p></p><p>Denny, M. & Chennell, F. (1986). Science Practical: What do Pupils Think? European</p><p>Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 325-336.</p><p></p><p>Durmus, J., & Bayraktar, S. (2010). Effects of conceptual change texts and laboratory</p><p>experiments on fourth grade students understanding of matter and change concepts.</p><p>Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 498504.</p><p></p><p>Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science</p><p>education: students motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses.</p><p>Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358-374.</p><p></p><p>Erdosne Toth, E., Morrow, B., & Ludvico, L. (2009). Designing Blended Inquiry Learning in</p><p>a Laboratory Context: A Study of Incorporating Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories.</p><p>Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 333344.</p><p></p><p>Evans, C., & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning.</p><p>Computers & Education, 49, 11471160.</p><p></p><p>Faizah A. Karim, Rafidah Sinone, Juliyana Baharudin, Norashikin Sahadan. (2005).</p><p>Keperluan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Multimedia bagi Subjek Sistem Elektronik 1 :</p><p>Satu Kajian Rintis di Politeknik Pasir Gudang (PJB). Seminar Pendidikan 2005, Fakulti</p><p>Pendidikan, UTM, 15 Oktober 2005.</p><p></p><p>Fariza Khalid. (2014). Students Views on the Use of e-Portfolio and Support Given to</p><p>Promote Their Computer Learning for Educational Purposes. Recent Advance in</p><p>Telecommunications, Informatics and Educational Technologies, 1, 54-59.</p><p></p><p>Farizatul Laili Md. Johari (2011). Penggunaan perisian agen pedagogi animasi bagi mata</p><p>pelajaran Kimia Tingkatan Empat untuk subtopik elektrolisis dalam industri.Tesis</p><p>Ijazah Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Fazilah Isa. (2006). Miskonsepsi di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 4 Dalam Memahami Konsep</p><p>Elektrolisis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.</p><p></p><p>Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S.</p><p>& Reid, S. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study</p><p>of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special</p><p>Topics Physics Education Research, 1(1).</p><p></p><p>Finkelstein, J. (2006). Learning in real times: synchronous teaching and learning online. San</p><p>Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Finley, F. N., Stewart, J. & Yarroch, W.L. (1982) . Teachers Perception of important and</p><p>difficult Science Content. Science Education, 66 (4), 531 538.</p><p></p><p>Flint, S., & Stewart, T. (2010). Food microbiology-design and testing of a virtual laboratory</p><p>exercise. Journal of Food Science Education, 9(4), 84-89.</p><p></p><p>Gabare, C., Gabarre, S., Rosseni Din, Parilah Mohd Shah, & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2014).</p><p>iPads in the Foreign Language Classroom : A Learners Perspective. The Southeast</p><p>Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20, 115-128.</p><p></p><p>Garavalia, L. S. & Gredler, M. E. (2002). An Exploratory Study of Academic Goal Setting,</p><p>Achievement Calibration and Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Instructional</p><p>Psychology, 29(4), 221-231.</p><p></p><p>Garnett, P. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992a). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High</p><p>School Students of Electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and Oxidation Reduction</p><p>Equation. Journals Of Research In Science Teaching, 29 (2), 121 142.</p><p></p><p>Garnett, P. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992b). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High</p><p>School Students of Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and Electrolytic Cell.</p><p>. Journals Of Research In Science Teaching, 29 (10), 1079 1099.</p><p></p><p>Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1993). Chemistry Misconceptions at the Secondary-</p><p>Tertiary Interface. Chemistry in Australia, 60 (3), 117 119.</p><p></p><p>Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J. & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students Alternative Conceptions in</p><p>Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Studies</p><p>in Science Education, 25, 69 95.</p><p></p><p>Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and</p><p>application (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali Yusri, Nik Mohd Rahimi dan Parilah (2010). Kebimbangan Ujian dan Motivasi</p><p>dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kursus Bahasa Arab dalam Konteks Kemahiran Lisan. ASEAN</p><p>Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education. 2 (2).</p><p></p><p>Giam, K. H. (2000). Gaya Pembelajaran Dan Penggunaan Multimedia Dalam Pengajaran</p><p>Dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(3).</p><p></p><p>Gibbons, N. J., Christ, E., Payne, A., Shah, K. and Griffin, D. (2004). Computer Simulations</p><p>Improve University Instructional Laboratories. Cell Biology Education, 3, 263269.</p><p></p><p>Greenbowe, T.J. (1994). An interactive multimedia software program for exploring</p><p>electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(7), 555 557.</p><p></p><p>Greenbowe, T.J. & Sanger, M.J. (1997). Common student misconception in electrochemistry:</p><p>Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research Science Teaching,</p><p>34(4), 377 398.</p><p></p><p>Greenbowe, T.J. & Sanger, M.J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning</p><p>electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animation and</p><p>conceptual change strategies. Journal of Chemical Education, 22(5), 521 537.</p><p></p><p>Griffith, A.K. & Preston, R.K. (1992). Grade-12 students misconception relating to</p><p>fundamental characteristic of atoms and molecules. Journal of Education Research,</p><p>29(6), 611 628.</p><p></p><p>Hamidah Baba (2000). Multimedia pendidikan dalam p&p sekolah bestari. Jurnal Bahagian</p><p>Teknologi Pendidikan,2 , 7 16.</p><p></p><p>Hamimah Abu Naim & Buerah Tunggak. (2014). Kesan motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran</p><p>terhadap pencapaian akademik dalam mata pelajaran sains. Sains Humanika, 2(1), 55</p><p>64.</p><p></p><p>Harlina binti Ishak, Zubaidah Mat Nor & Ainee Ahmad. (2017). Pembelajaran Interaktif</p><p>Berasaskan Aplikasi Kahoot dalam Pengajaran Abad Ke-21. Buku Panduan</p><p>Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Abad ke21. Institut Pendidikan Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Hasnira Embong. 2005. Pembinaan dan keberkesanan penggunaan perisian multimedia</p><p>Elektrokimia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana,</p><p>Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (tidak diterbitkan).</p><p></p><p>Heath, S. (1999). Multimedia and Communications Technology. Focal Press.</p><p></p><p>Hill, J.R. & Hannafin, M.J. (2001). Teaching and Learning in Digital Environments: The</p><p>Resurgence of Resourse-Based Learning. ETR&D, 49(3), 37-52.</p><p></p><p>Hodson, D. (1996). Practical Work in School Science: Exploring Some Directions for</p><p>Change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760.</p><p></p><p>Hynd C., Holschuh J., Nist S. (2000). Learning Complex Scientific Information: Motivation</p><p>Theory and its Relation to Student Perceptions. Reading Writing Quarterly, 16 (1), 23-</p><p>35.</p><p></p><p>Ismail Zain. (2002). Aplikasi Multimedia dalam Pengajaran, Kuala Lumpur: Sanon Printing</p><p>Corporation sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Ittigson, R.J. & Zewe, J.G. (2003). Technology in the mathematics classroom. In Tomei, L.A.</p><p>(Ed.). Challenges of Teaching with Technology Across the Curriculum: Issues and</p><p>Solutions. Hershey: Information Science Publishing, 114-133.</p><p></p><p>Jackson, S.L. (2003). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. USA:</p><p>Thomson Wadsworth.</p><p></p><p>Jamalludin Harun, Zaidatun Tasir (2001). Pembangunan Perisian Multimedia : Satu</p><p>Pendekatan Sistematik. Edisi Pertama. Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Jamalludin Harun & Zaidatun Tasir. (2003). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Pahang: PTS</p><p>Publications & Distributors.</p><p></p><p>Jamalludin Harun, Baharuddin Aris & Zaidatun Tasir. (2003). Pembangunan Perisian</p><p>Multimedia: Satu pendekatan sistematik, (Edisi ke-2), Selangor: Venton Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Jamaludin Mohaiadin. (1999). Konstruktivisme: Aplikasinya dalam reka bentuk</p><p>pembelajaran berasaskan web. Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi Pendidikan</p><p>ke-12 (m.s.11 4). Port Dickson: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Jansak, K. E., & Alley, L. R. (2001). The Ten Keys to Quality Assurance and Assessment in</p><p>Online Learning. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 3-18.</p><p></p><p>Juppri Bacotang & Zainiah Mohamad Isa. (2016). Aplikasi Model ADDIE dalam</p><p>Pembangunan. 1st International Teacher Education Conference on Teaching Practice</p><p>(ITECTP). Modul Awal Literasi (Modul A-Lit) untuk Kanak-kanak TASKA.</p><p></p><p>Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2011). Developing a laboratory activity on electrochemical cell by</p><p>using 5E learning model for teaching and improving science process skills. Western</p><p>Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences : Special Issue. 121-130.</p><p></p><p>Kashdan, T. B. & F. D. Fincham. (2004). Facilitating Curiosity: A Social and Self-Regulatory</p><p>Perspective for Scientifically Based Interventions. Positive Psychology in Practice,</p><p>New Jersey: Wiley, 482-503.</p><p></p><p>Kaware, S. S., & Sain, S. K. (2015). ICT Application in Education: An Overview.</p><p>International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 2, 25-32.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1989). Kamus dewan edisi baru. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1996). Laporan prestasi SPM-Kimia2. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2002). Laporan prestasi SPM-Kimia2. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Kimia KBSM. Kuala</p><p>Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Keong, C. C., Sharaf Horani & Daniel, J. (2005). A Study on The Use of ICT in Mathematics</p><p>Teaching. Malaysian Online Journal of Instuctional Technology, 2(3), 4351.</p><p></p><p>Khairunnisa Darus, Ismail Zainol, Hafsah Taha. (2016). Multimedia laboratory module in the</p><p>learning of electrochemistry : need assessment study. Journal of Science and</p><p>Mathematics Letters, 4, 31-37.</p><p></p><p>Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L. & PALS Group. (2006). Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions:</p><p>The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction. ETR&D, 54(3), 223-243.</p><p></p><p>Kirk, K. (2008). Performance, Perception and Choice of Animated Pedagogical Agent. Tesis</p><p>Doktor Falsafah. University of Nevada, Las Vegas.</p><p></p><p>Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During</p><p>Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery,</p><p>Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational</p><p>Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.</p><p></p><p>Koksal, M. S. (2009). Vocational high school students sense of self-efficacy and test anxiety</p><p>regarding biology learning. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education,</p><p>10(1), 57-67.</p><p></p><p>Koretsky, M. D., Amatore, D., Barnes, C., & Kimura, S. (2008). Enhancement of student</p><p>learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory. IEEE Transactions on</p><p>Education, 51(1), 7685.</p><p></p><p>Lai, S. P. (2003). Keberkesanan Perisian Multimedia bagi Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran</p><p>Eletrokimia (Sel Elektrolisis dan Sel Kimia): Satu Kajian Kes. Universiti Teknologi</p><p>Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan.</p><p></p><p>Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive Requirements for Learning with Open-Ended Learning</p><p>Environments. ETR&D, 48(3), 61-78.</p><p></p><p>Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A Design Framework for Enhancing Engagement in</p><p>Studentcentered Learning: Own It, Learn It, and Share It. Education Tech Research</p><p>Dev, 64, 707-734.</p><p></p><p>Lee, T. T. (2008). Kefahaman pelajar Tingkatan Empat mengenai Elektrokimia. Universiti</p><p>Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Lee, T. T. (2013). Penggunaan modul multimedia interaktif dengan agen pedagogi dalam</p><p>pembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Lee, T. T. & Mohammad Yusof, Arshad. (2009). Miskonsepsi pelajar tingkatan empat</p><p>mengenai Elektrokimia. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik UPSI, 1(2), 52-64.</p><p></p><p>Li, P., & Pan, G. (2009). The relationship between motivation and achievement-a survey of</p><p>the study motivation of English majors in Qingdao Agricultural University. English</p><p>Language Teaching, 2(1).</p><p></p><p>Lim, C.H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantiatif dan kualitatif. Selangor:</p><p>McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Lin, H. S., Yang, T. C., Chiu. H. L. & Chou, C. Y. (2002). Students Difficulties in Learning</p><p>Electrochemistry. Proceding of the National Science Council, 12(3), 100 105.</p><p></p><p>Liu, H. C., Andre, T. & Greenbowe, T. J. (2008). The impact of learners prior knowledge</p><p>on their use of chemistry computer simulations: a case study. Journal of Science</p><p>Edducation and Technology, 17(5), 466-482.</p><p></p><p>Liu, H.C. 2005. Examining the use of computer simulations to promote learning of</p><p>electrochemistry among college students. Tesis Ph.D. Iowa State University (tidak</p><p>diterbitkan).</p><p></p><p>Livingstone, D.W. (2001). Adults Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps and</p><p>Future Research. Centre for the Study of Education and Work, NALL Working Paper;</p><p>21.</p><p></p><p>Lizawati Mohamad Ham, Hamisah Abu Rashid, Ku Haslina Ku Abd Manaf & Mohd Taufiq</p><p>Syakirin. (2017). Tahap motivasi intrinsik dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran</p><p>kimia topik gas berasaskan permainan Jejak Rembo. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi,</p><p>13.</p><p></p><p>Lou, S. J., Lin, H. C., Shih, R. C. & Tseng, K. H. (2012). Improving the effectiveness of</p><p>organic chemistry experiments through multimedia teaching materials for junior high</p><p>school students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 135-141.</p><p></p><p>Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic</p><p>graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157176.</p><p></p><p>Lowe, R. K. (2004). Animation and learning: Value for money? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath,</p><p>D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the</p><p>21st ASCILITE Conference, 558561. Retrieved 29 Januari 2013, from</p><p>http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/ procs/lowe-r.html.</p><p></p><p>Lynda W. K. N. & Megan K. Y. C. (2002). Authentic Problem-Based Learning. Singapore :</p><p>Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Ma, J., & J. V. Nickerson. (2006). Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A</p><p>Comparative Literature Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 124.</p><p></p><p>Mahajan, D. S. & Singh, G. S. Lonaka. (2005). Bulletin of the Center for Academic</p><p>Development University of Bostwana, 14, 25-35.</p><p></p><p>Martens, R. L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Predicting intrinsic motivation. Association for</p><p>Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 621-630). Washington, DC:</p><p>Association for Educational Communications and Technology.</p><p></p><p>Martinez, G., F. L. Naranjo, . L. Prez, M. I. Suero, & P. J. Pardo. (2011). Comparative</p><p>Study of the Effectiveness of Three Learning Environments: Hyper-realistic Virtual</p><p>Simulations, Traditional Schematic Simulations and Traditional Laboratory. Physical</p><p>Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 7 (2), 112.</p><p></p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer</p><p>(Ed.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia</p><p>learning (p. 4371). Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K. & Mautone, P.D. (2003). Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Role</p><p>of Speakers Voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 419-425.</p><p></p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing</p><p>Research.</p><p></p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>McBrien, J. L. & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The Language of Learning: A Guide to Education</p><p>Terms. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.</p><p></p><p>McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York:</p><p>Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Mei-Hung Chiu. (2005). A National Survey Of Students Conceptions In Chemistry In</p><p>Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6(1).</p><p></p><p>Melaku, M. W. & Gizaw, G. S. (2019). Motivation and attitude towards learning chemistry.</p><p>African Journal of Chemistry Education, 9 (2).</p><p></p><p>Michelle, Tong Chung Koon. (2003). Hubungkait Antara Kecekapan Sosial Dan Motivasi</p><p>Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik. Tidak diterbitkan. Tesis Sarjana.</p><p>Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.</p><p></p><p>Mohamed Amin Embi & Azmi Abdul Latiff. (1999). Membina perisian interaktif</p><p>multimedia: Pembelajaran arahan kendiri. Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi</p><p>Pendidikan ke-12. Port Dickson: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Mohamed Shariff Salehuadin. (2002). Pembangunan perisian pengajaran dan pembelajaran</p><p>berbantukan komputer: Macromedia Flash 4 peringkat permulaan. Tesis sarjana</p><p>pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Norain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan & Muhamad</p><p>Ikhwan Mat Saad. (2017). Adventure Based Learning Module: Content Validity and</p><p>Reliability Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social</p><p>Science, 7(2).</p><p></p><p>Mohd Arif Hj Ismail, Abdullah Mohd Sarif, & Rosnaini Hj Mahmud. (2000). Pembangunan</p><p>perisian multimedia interaktif Geografi. Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi</p><p>Pendidikan ke-13 (m.s.61 68). Ipoh: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Feham Md. Ghalib. (2006). Design, Development & Evaluation of a Web Courseware</p><p>with a Pedagogical Agent. Tesis Doktor Falsafah Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan</p><p>Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti</p><p>Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal selidik Pendidikan. Skudai:</p><p>Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Nor Bakar & Mohd Izham Mukhtar. (2011). Masalah yang dihadapi dikalangan pelajar</p><p>tingkatan 4 dalaam proses pembelajaran elektrolisis leburan berdasarkan matapelajaran</p><p>kimia KBSM. Jurnal of Educational Social Science, 1, 96-120.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Salleh Tahar, Noraiani Kaprawi, Jailani Md Yunos, Wahid Razzaly, Ilyas Hj Hashim</p><p>& Abdul Mutalib Leman. (2004). Penghasilan kit sumber penyamanan udara</p><p>(SYS.TPU.1) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan kejuruteraan di</p><p>KUiTTHO. Dalam Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi Pendidikan ke-17 (m.s.141 160).</p><p>Pulau Pinang: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Mohseni, Majid & Sarkeshikian, Amir. (2015). Test Anxiety, Task Value and Control of</p><p>Learning Beliefs as Predictors of Affective Language Learning Strategies: The Case of</p><p>Iranian EFL Students.</p><p></p><p>Muhamad Suhaimi Taat & Mohd Yusof Abdullah. (2014). Impak Pengajaran Dan Bimbingan</p><p>Guru Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Motivasi Dan Pembelajaran Terarah Kendiri Pelajar.</p><p>Journal for Educational Thinkers, 5, 1-17.</p><p></p><p>Mustafa, Z., & Salim, H. (2012). Factors Affecting Students Interest in Learning Islamic</p><p>Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(13), 81-86.</p><p></p><p>Muzammila Akram, Johari Surif & Murad Ali. (2014). Conceptual Difficulties of Secondary</p><p>School Students in Electrochemistry. Asian Social Science, 10(19).</p><p></p><p>Narayanasamy, K. (2000). Melayan Pelbagai Gaya Pembelajaran : Pengajaran Kemahiran</p><p>Berfikir Sebagai Satu Alternatif Berkesan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tiga ENF. 2(3), 64-70.</p><p></p><p>Neuville, S. Frenay, M. & Bourgeois, E. (2007). Task Value, Self-Efficacy and Goal</p><p>Orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among</p><p>university students. Psychologica Belgica, 47, 95-117.</p><p></p><p>Ng, L. H. (2002). Sejauhmanakah kerangka alterbatif tentang sel galvani berlaku dikalangan</p><p>pelajar program sains (kimia). Projek ilmiah sarjana muda yang tidak diterbitkan,</p><p>Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Niemczyk, M. & Savenye, W. (2005). Self-regulation in computer literacy course. Academic</p><p>Exchange Quarterly, 9(4).</p><p></p><p>Noah, M.N. & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan</p><p>dan Modul Akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Ahmad. (2002). Siri Motivasi Dan Kecemerlangan Utusan: Kaunseling</p><p>Kekeluargaan. Cheras: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Shah Alam : McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p></p><p>Norliana Hashim & Shaharom Noordin. (2005). Pembinaan dan Penilaian Kesuaian</p><p>Pengajaran Kendiri Sifat Jirim bagi Mata Pelajaran Fizik KBSM Tingkatan Empat.</p><p>Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.</p><p></p><p>Norton, P., & Sprague, D. (2001). Technology for teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p>Nur Sharydatul Elyza Saharudin, Nik Farhan Mustapha, Hazlina Abdul Halim, Jusang</p><p>Bolong. (2017). Motivasi pelajar terhadap penggunaan teknologi maklumat dan</p><p>komunikasi (ICT) dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Perancis. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 15(2).</p><p></p><p>Nur Qistina Abdullah & Hazman Ali. (2006). Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat dan</p><p>Komunikasi (ICT) dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Sekolah Kebangsaan. Universiti</p><p>Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nurul Ain Hamsari dan Azizi Yahaya. (2012). Peranan motivasi pembelajaran, gaya</p><p>keibubapaan dan sikap dengan pencapaian akademik. Journal of Educational</p><p>Psychology & Counseling, 5, 30-57.</p><p></p><p>Ogune, A. N. & Bradley, J. D. (1994). Ionic Conduction and Electrical Neutrality in</p><p>Operating Electrochemical Cells: Pre-College and College Student Interpretations.</p><p>Journal of Chemical Education, 71 (1), 29 34.</p><p></p><p>Olubu, O. M. (2015). Effects Of Laboratory Learning Environment On Students' Learning</p><p>Outcomes In Secondary School Chemistry. International Journal of Arts & Sciences,</p><p>8(2), 507-525.</p><p></p><p>Ozdener, N. (2005). Deneysel ogretim yontemlerinde benzetisim (simulation) kullanimi. The</p><p>Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology TOJET, 4 (4).</p><p></p><p>Ozkaya, R.A., Uce, M., & Sahin, M. (2003). Prospective teachers conceptual understanding</p><p>of electrochemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 7(1), 1-8.</p><p></p><p>Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into</p><p>Practice, 41(2), 116-125.</p><p></p><p>Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS</p><p>for windows. Buckingham Open University Press.</p><p></p><p>Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. (2013). Kementerian Pendidikan</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Penuel W. R., Abrahamson A. L., Roschelle, J. (2006) Theorizing the transformed classroom:</p><p>A sociocultural interpretation of the effects of audience response systems in higher</p><p>education. In: Banks D (ed) Audience response systems in higher education:</p><p>applications and cases. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, 187208.</p><p></p><p>Perkins-Gough, D. (2005). The Status of Science Lab. Americas Lab Report: Investigations</p><p>in High School Science. United State of America.</p><p></p><p>Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining selfregulated</p><p>learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.</p><p></p><p>Pintrich, R.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components</p><p>of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.</p><p></p><p>Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use</p><p>of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). The University of</p><p>Michigan: Ann Arbor, Michigan.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, C.T. & Owen, S. V. (2007) Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content</p><p>validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 459-</p><p>467.</p><p></p><p>Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and</p><p>technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research.</p><p>Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129.</p><p></p><p>Raineri, D. (2001). Virtual Laboratories Enhance Traditional Undergraduate Biology</p><p>Laboratories. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29, 160162.</p><p></p><p>Rajmah Hassan Siarat. (2005). Buku Teks-Tetap Relevan di zaman ICT. Utusan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Rasidah Rashid. (2008). Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan motivasi dalam</p><p>kalangan pelajar di sebuah sekolah luar bandar di Sabah. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti</p><p>Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Razak Abd Samad Yahya, Anis Nazihah Mat Daud & Rosly Jaafar. (2019). Development and</p><p>evaluation of multi-frame video recorded experiments as self-learning materials for</p><p>electricity topic. Malaysian Online Journal of Education Technology, 7(1).</p><p></p><p>Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation : How people treat computers, television,</p><p>and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Rosazley Ramly, Rosly Jaafar, Anis Nazihah Mat Daud, Shaharudin Ali, Wan Zul Adli Wan</p><p>Mokhtar, Roszairi Haron & Nur Azmina Mohamed Safian. (2014). Effectiveness study</p><p>of interactive lecture demonstration based in multi-frames display system for preuniversity</p><p>physics: capasitor. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 2, 32-39.</p><p></p><p>Rosazley Ramly, Rosly Jaafar, Anis Nazihah Mat Daud, Shaharudin Ali, Wan Zul Adli Wan</p><p>Mokhtar, Roszairi Haron & Nur Azmina Mohamed Safian. (2016). Effectiveness of</p><p>multi-frames video recorded experiments on pre-university sudents achievement for</p><p>capacitor topic. EDUCATUM JSMT, 3 (2), 38-43.</p><p></p><p>Rosly, J., Shahrul Kadri, A., Roszairi, H., Shaharudin, A., Zul Adli, W. M., & Razak Samad,</p><p>Y. (2012). The utilization of a multi-frame video system in the teaching and learning of</p><p>science. Paper presented at the Proceedings of EDULEARN12 Conference, Barcelona,</p><p>Spain.</p><p></p><p>Rosni Adom dan Nor Aishah Buang (2000). Aplikasi model pembelajaran penceritaan dalam</p><p>reka bentuk instruksi perisian pendidikan multimedia subjek ekonomi asas tingkatan 4.</p><p>Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi Pendidikan ke-13, 79 98.</p><p></p><p>Rosset, A. (1987). Training Needs Assessment. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ; Educational</p><p>Technology Publication Sandholtz.</p><p></p><p>Rozinah Jamaludin. (2000). Asas-asas multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan</p><p>Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Rozinah Jamaludin. (2005). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan</p><p>Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd</p><p></p><p>Ruhizan Mohd. Yassin, Mohd. Jasmy Abd. Rahman, Norlena Salamuddin & Rosadah</p><p>Abd. Majid. (2001). Proses kognitif pelajar cemerlang dan tidak cemerlang. Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan, 27 34.</p><p></p><p>Rusmini Ku Ahmad (2003). Integrasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran</p><p>dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 13(01), 82-91.</p><p></p><p>Russell J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction: A Guide to the Design, Selection, Utilization and</p><p>Evaluation of Modular Materials. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Russilo, M. T. C. & Arias, P. F. C. (2004).Gender Differences In Academic Motivation Of</p><p>Secondary School Students. Electronic of Journal Research in Educational Psychology,</p><p>2(1), 97-112.</p><p></p><p>Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic</p><p>motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,55, 6878.</p><p></p><p>Sadiah Baharom, Syarifah Norhaidah Syed Idvos & Nordin Abd. Razak. (2003). Selfregulatory</p><p>cognitive and rnetacognitive learning strategies of preuniversity students;</p><p>Issues and challenges, International Seminar an Learning and Motivation; Issues and</p><p>Challenges in A Borderless World, Copthome Hotel,Penang.</p><p></p><p>Sadiah Baharom, Ong, E. T., Marzita, P., Sopia, M. Y., Nurul Huda, A. R., & Muhamad, I.</p><p>M. S. (2009). The Validation and adaptation of MLSQ aimed to assess student use of</p><p>self-regulated learning. Paper presented at 1st International Conference on Educational</p><p>Research and Practice Enhancing Human Capital through Teacher Education, Faculty</p><p>of Educational Studies UPM 10-11 June 2009.</p><p></p><p>Saemah Rahman & John, A. P. (2006). Hubungan antara kesedaran metakognisi dan</p><p>pencapaian akademik pelajar universiti. Jurnal PendidikanUKM, 31, 21-39.</p><p></p><p>Saleh Ahmed Al Khatib. (2010). Meta-cognitive self-regulated learning and motivational</p><p>beliefs as predictors of college students performance. International Journal for</p><p>Research in Education(IJRE), 27, 57-72.</p><p></p><p>Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D,. (2011). Students Motivation to Learn Chemistry: The Greek</p><p>Case. Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Ionian Islands.</p><p></p><p>Sanger, M. J., Phelps, A. J. & Fienhold, J. (2000). Using a computer animation to improve</p><p>students conceptual understanding of a can-crushing demonstration. Journal of</p><p>Chemical Education, 77(11), 1517.</p><p></p><p>Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997a). Common Student Misconceptions in</p><p>Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic, and concentration Cells. Journal of Research</p><p>in Science Teaching, 34 (4), 377 398.</p><p></p><p>Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997b). Common Student Misconceptions in</p><p>Electrochemistry: Current Flow in Electrolyte Soltions and the Salt Bridge. Journal of</p><p>Chemical Education, 74, 819 823.</p><p></p><p>Sarwat Mubeen, Safia Saeed & Arif, M. H. (2013). An Investigation the Gender Difference</p><p>into the Status of Intrinsic Motivation towards Science Learning Among Intermediate</p><p>Science Students . IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 10(6), 81-85.</p><p></p><p>Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1997). Making instructional design decisions. Upper Saddle River,</p><p>NJ: Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Sever, S., Yurumezoglu, K., & Oguz-Unver, A. (2010). Comparison teaching strategies of</p><p>videotaped and demonstration experiments in inquiry-based science education.</p><p>Procedia: Social and Behavioral Science, 2, 56195624.</p><p></p><p>Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D., Coombes, J., & Lee, F. (2007). Student e-learning intrinsic</p><p>motivation: A qualitative analysis. Communications of the Association for Information</p><p>Systems, 2007(19), 241-260.</p><p></p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul. Bagaimana membina</p><p>modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit UPM.</p><p></p><p>Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview, Journal of Turkish</p><p>Sciences Education, 4(2), 2-20.</p><p></p><p>Schmidt H., Marohn A., & Harrison A., (2007). Factors that prevent learning in</p><p>electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 258283.</p><p></p><p>Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2012). Motivation in Education : Theory,</p><p>Research and Application. 3rd ed. Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Storm, M. (2011). Cognitive Development: Cognitive Development (2nd ed.). Amerika:</p><p>American Institutes for Research. 17-25</p><p></p><p>Streiner D. L., Norman G. R. & Cairney J. (2014). Health Measurement Scales. A Practical</p><p>Guide to Their Development and Use. 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University</p><p>Press.</p><p></p><p>Steinmayr, R., Crede, J., McElvany, N., & Wirthwein, L. (2016). Subjective wellbeing, test</p><p>anxiety, academic achievement: testing for reciprocal effects. Frontiers in Psychology.</p><p>6:1994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01994.</p><p></p><p>Subahan T. Meerah. (1990). Pembinaan alat kajian untuk mengukur tingkah laku pengajaran</p><p>di sekolah dan di universiti. Jurnal Pendidikan, 15, 43-63.</p><p></p><p>Suriati Awang. (1999). Masalah Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Dalam Mempelajari Persamaan</p><p>Kimia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Suppiah Nachiappan, Ramlah Jantan & Abdul Aziz Abdul Shukor. (2008). Psikologi</p><p>Pendidikan. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Swan, A., & ODonnell, A. (2009). The contribution of a virtual biology laboratory to college</p><p>students learning. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 46(4), 405419.</p><p></p><p>Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive</p><p>Science, 12, 257-285.</p><p></p><p>Syed Abd Kadir Syed Abdullah. (2000). Masalah Pelajar Dalam Mempelajari Tajuk</p><p>Elektrokimia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.</p><p></p><p>Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry</p><p>triplet. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2),179195.</p><p></p><p>Tan, Y.T., Loh, W.L. & Tan, O.T. 2007. Success Chemistry SPM. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar</p><p>Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Tuan H. L., Chin, C. C. & Shei, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure</p><p>students motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 27(6), 639654.</p><p></p><p>Teksan, K. (2019). The Perceptions of Students Studyng in the Faculty of Education</p><p>Towards Reading in Terms of Ther Reading Motivations. International Journal of</p><p>Progressive Education, 15(5), 162184.</p><p></p><p>Tooke, D.J. and Lindstiom, L.C. (1998). Effectiveness of Mathematics methods course in</p><p>reducing math anxiety of preserves elementary teacher. School Science and</p><p>Mathematics, 98(3), 136-139.</p><p></p><p>Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: comparing the influence</p><p>of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students' ability to</p><p>design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 149-173.</p><p></p><p>Tsapaarlis, G. (2003). Chemical phenomena versus chemical reactions: Do students make the</p><p>connection?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4(1), 31-43.</p><p></p><p>Tuysuz, C. (2010). The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students Achievement and</p><p>Attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-</p><p>53.</p><p></p><p>Van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination.</p><p>Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 14011418.</p><p></p><p>Virvao, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education:</p><p>Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (5),</p><p>5465.</p><p></p><p>Wanda, C. M. & Bozena, B. W. (2009). Assessment of Chemistry Anxiety in a Two-Year</p><p>College. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1447-1449.</p><p></p><p>Ward, C.R. & Herron, J.D. (1980). Helping students understand formal chemical concepts.</p><p>Journal of Research Science Teaching, 17(5), 387 400.</p><p></p><p>Whitehall, B. & B. McDonald. (1993). Improving Learning Persistence of Military Personnel</p><p>by Enhancing Motivation in a Technological Training Program. Simulation and</p><p>Gaming, (24), 294-313.</p><p></p><p>Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction. London: Allyn &</p><p>Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Wiesner, T. F., & Lan, W. (2004). Comparison of student learning in physical and simulated</p><p>unit operations experiments. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 195-204.</p><p></p><p>Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond Cognition: Reading Motivation and</p><p>Reading Comprehension. Child Development Perspective, 10(3), 190-195.</p><p></p><p>Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and</p><p>Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition and Achievement. Journal</p><p>of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.</p><p></p><p>Woolfolk. (2008). Educational Psikology, Tenth Edition, Module 27, Motivation: A</p><p>definition and four general approaches, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, 405-410.</p><p></p><p>Xu, X., Villafane, S.M., & Lewis, J.E. (2013). College students attitudes toward chemistry,</p><p>conceptual knowledge and achievement: structural equation model analysis. Chemistry</p><p>Education Research and Practice, 14, 188-200.</p><p></p><p>Yalcin, M. & Celiker, D. (2011). The Effect of Computer-Assisted Applications in the</p><p>Teaching of Matter and Heat Subject. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research.</p><p>(42), 273290.</p><p></p><p>Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1).</p><p></p><p>Yamauchi, J. ,Kumagai, Y. & Kawasaki, Y. (1999). Perceived control, autonomy and selfregulated</p><p>learning strategies among Japanese high scholl students. Psychological</p><p>Reports, 85(3), 779-798.</p><p></p><p>Yee, S. F. (2001). Kimia Tingkatan 4. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Rina.</p><p></p><p>Yusup Hashim & Razmah Man. (1999). Instruksi dan pembelajaran berasaskan teknologi</p><p>multimedia: Isu dan aplikasi dalam instruksi dan pembelajaran bestari. Dalam</p><p>Prosiding Konvensyen Teknologi Pendidikan ke-12 (m.s.45 64). Port Dickson:</p><p>Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Yusup Hashim. (2001). Reka bentuk dan sistem instruksi. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Sains</p><p>Malaysia dan Utusan Publications & Distributors.</p><p></p><p>Yusuf Hashim. (2006). Reka bentuk instruksional dan teknologi (5th ed.). Tanjong Malim:</p><p>Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort</p><p>to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer</p><p>Assisted Learning, 23, 120-132.</p><p></p><p>Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, C. P. (2008). Comparing the influence of physical and</p><p>virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: the case of</p><p>undergraduate students' conceptual understanding of heat and temperature. American</p><p>Journal of Physics, 76, 425-430.</p><p></p><p>Zulzana Zulkarnain, Mohamed Saim & Roslina Abd Talib. (2012). Hubungan antara minat,</p><p>sikap dengan pencapaian pelajar dalam kursus CC301 Quantity Measurement.</p><p>Politeknik Port Dickson.</p><p></p><p>Zuraidi Wahid. (2008). Kesan penggunaan modul pembelajaran regulasi kendiri terhadap</p><p>motivasi dan pencapaian pelajar bagi tajuk fotosintesis tingkatan empat, (Disertasi</p><p>Sarjana, Univcrsiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Yang Tidak Diterbitkan).</p><p></p> |