The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1
<p>This study aims to analyze the cultural categories displayed in the Pulse 2 EL textbook</p><p>for Form 1 syllabus, investigate how foreign cultures and topics are introduced to Form</p><p>1 students, and identify the perception...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9028 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9028 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
eng |
topic |
PE English |
spellingShingle |
PE English Yugeswari Arumugam The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
description |
<p>This study aims to analyze the cultural categories displayed in the Pulse 2 EL textbook</p><p>for Form 1 syllabus, investigate how foreign cultures and topics are introduced to Form</p><p>1 students, and identify the perception of Form 1 ESL teachers on the textbook</p><p>specifically on the foreign contents. This study employed mixed-method research with</p><p>applied convergent parallel design. The first phase of the data collection involved</p><p>quantitative analysis using a questionnaire that was administered to 30 Form 1 ESL</p><p>teachers. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics via SPSS</p><p>software. The qualitative data were collected through theory-based content analysis of</p><p>the textbook and semi-structured interviews with five Form 1 teachers from schools in</p><p>Batang Padang, Perak. Based on the findings, it is evident that all the eleven criteria by</p><p>Byram et al. (1994, 51-52) and Risager (1991, 182-183,188) were present in the Form</p><p>1 syllabus, thus proving it to be culturally rich, especially with UK-centric contents.</p><p>Besides, the researcher found an imbalance in the portrayal of cultural categories in the</p><p>Form 1 syllabus and no reference was made to the Malaysian context. Designing</p><p>personal materials, making comparisons between target and local cultures, and using</p><p>resources such as visuals and web-based learning are the most common pedagogical</p><p>methods utlised by Form 1 teachers in introducing the foreign content to their students.</p><p>Although the teachers have positive perceptions on the general aspects of the textbook,</p><p>they disclosed a mixed perception on the foreign cultural content. In conclusion, the</p><p>Pulse 2 EL textbook hinders its functions in assisting the Form 1 teachers with the rich</p><p>portrayal of foreign content. The finding is hoped to serve as a reference for</p><p>stakeholders to make meaningful decisions in localizing and revising the CEFR-aligned</p><p>textbooks in Malaysia.</p> |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Yugeswari Arumugam |
author_facet |
Yugeswari Arumugam |
author_sort |
Yugeswari Arumugam |
title |
The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
title_short |
The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
title_full |
The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
title_fullStr |
The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 |
title_sort |
analysis of cultural of pulse 2 esl textbook for form 1 |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9028 |
_version_ |
1776104587766267904 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:90282023-06-13 The analysis of cultural of Pulse 2 ESL textbook for form 1 2022 Yugeswari Arumugam PE English <p>This study aims to analyze the cultural categories displayed in the Pulse 2 EL textbook</p><p>for Form 1 syllabus, investigate how foreign cultures and topics are introduced to Form</p><p>1 students, and identify the perception of Form 1 ESL teachers on the textbook</p><p>specifically on the foreign contents. This study employed mixed-method research with</p><p>applied convergent parallel design. The first phase of the data collection involved</p><p>quantitative analysis using a questionnaire that was administered to 30 Form 1 ESL</p><p>teachers. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics via SPSS</p><p>software. The qualitative data were collected through theory-based content analysis of</p><p>the textbook and semi-structured interviews with five Form 1 teachers from schools in</p><p>Batang Padang, Perak. Based on the findings, it is evident that all the eleven criteria by</p><p>Byram et al. (1994, 51-52) and Risager (1991, 182-183,188) were present in the Form</p><p>1 syllabus, thus proving it to be culturally rich, especially with UK-centric contents.</p><p>Besides, the researcher found an imbalance in the portrayal of cultural categories in the</p><p>Form 1 syllabus and no reference was made to the Malaysian context. Designing</p><p>personal materials, making comparisons between target and local cultures, and using</p><p>resources such as visuals and web-based learning are the most common pedagogical</p><p>methods utlised by Form 1 teachers in introducing the foreign content to their students.</p><p>Although the teachers have positive perceptions on the general aspects of the textbook,</p><p>they disclosed a mixed perception on the foreign cultural content. In conclusion, the</p><p>Pulse 2 EL textbook hinders its functions in assisting the Form 1 teachers with the rich</p><p>portrayal of foreign content. The finding is hoped to serve as a reference for</p><p>stakeholders to make meaningful decisions in localizing and revising the CEFR-aligned</p><p>textbooks in Malaysia.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9028 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9028 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>Abdallah, M. M. S. (2016) Issues with the Time for English textbook series at Egyptian Primary</p><p>Schools: An evaluative study. Journal of Faculty of Education, Assiut University, 32(1), 2-51.</p><p></p><p>Adaskou, K., Britten, D. & Fahsi, B. (1990). Design decisions on the cultural content of a course</p><p>for Morocco. ELT Journal, 44(1), 3-10.</p><p></p><p>Adom, D., Hussein., Emad., Joe. & Adu, A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory</p><p>ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438-441.</p><p></p><p>Afrin, H. T. (2016). A study on the role of textbooks in second language acquisition. (Masters</p><p>Thesis). BRAC University, Dhaka. Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Ahmed, F. & Narcy-Combes, M. F. (2011). An Analysis of Textbooks from a Cultural Point of View.</p><p>TESOL Journal, 5(1), 21-37.</p><p></p><p>Ahour, T., & Ahmadi, E. (2012). Retrospective evaluation of textbook Summit 2B for its</p><p>suitability for EFL undergraduate students. Book of Proceedings of the International Conference on</p><p>Human and Social Sciences, 6, 176-184.</p><p></p><p>Al Hadi, M.L, & Mohd Shah, P. (2020). Malaysian ESL teachers perception towards CEFR-Aligned</p><p>Textbooks. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 10(6), 73-79.</p><p></p><p>Allwright, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied</p><p>Linguistics, 5(2), 156-71.</p><p></p><p>Alsheenqeeti, H. (2019). Representation of culture in EFL textbooks and learners preference.</p><p>Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 127-135.</p><p></p><p>Awasthi, R. J. (2006). Textbook and its evaluation. Journal of NELTA, 11(1-2), 1- 10.</p><p></p><p>Bazeley, P. (2009). Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research [Editorial].</p><p>Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203207.</p><p></p><p>BBC Bitesize (2021). GCSE. Retrieved on 24 March 2021 from</p><p>https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/levels/z98jmp3</p><p></p><p>Berk, L., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood</p><p>learning. Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young Children.</p><p></p><p>Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Sage: Cleveland.</p><p></p><p>Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative</p><p>Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.</p><p></p><p>Britannica, T. (2011). The Fringe & King Arthur. Encyclopedia Britannica.</p><p>Retrieved on 25th March 2021 from https://www.britannica.com/art/the-Fringe</p><p></p><p>Byram, M., & Esarte-Sarries (1991). Investigating cultural studies in foreign</p><p>language teaching: A book for teacher. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</p><p></p><p>Byram, M., & Morgan, C. (1994). Teaching and learning language and culture.</p><p>Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</p><p></p><p>Byram, M., Nicholas, A. & Stevans, D. (2001). Developing intercultural competence</p><p>in practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</p><p></p><p>Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural</p><p>dimension in language teaching: a practical introduction for teachers.</p><p>Strasbourg: Council of Europe.</p><p></p><p>Cambridge English. (2018). English Language Teaching [Super Minds]. Retrieved</p><p>on January, 8th 2018 from</p><p>http://www.cambridge.org/us/cambridgeenglish/catalog/primary/super-minds</p><p></p><p>Cavalcanti, I., & Tavares, R. (1996). Developing cultural awareness in English</p><p>Teaching Forum. Washington: The United States Information Agency.</p><p></p><p>CEFR. (2013). Introductory Guide to CEFR for English Language Teachers</p><p>Retrieved on July 7th, 2016 from</p><p>http://www.englishprofile.org/images/pdf/GuideToCEFR.pdf</p><p></p><p>Celce-Murcia, M. (1998). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (3rd</p><p>ed.). USA: Heinle & Heinle.</p><p></p><p>Chapelle, C. A. (2009). A hidden curriculum in language textbooks: Are beginning</p><p>learners of French at U.S.Universities taught about Canada? The Modern</p><p>Language Journal, 93, 139152.</p><p></p><p>Chitravelu, N., Sithamparam,S. & Teh.S.C (2005) ELT Methodology; principles and</p><p>practice. (2nd ed). Selangor: Oxford Fajar.</p><p></p><p>Chow, M.D. (2017). Why the rush to use imported English textbooks, asks DAP MP.</p><p>Free Malaysia Today. Retrieved on 23rd November, 2018 from</p><p>https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/11/23/why-therush-</p><p>to-useimported-english-textbooks-asks-dap-mp/</p><p></p><p>Clarke, J. & Clarke, M. (1990). Stereotyping in TESOL materials, in Harrison, B.</p><p>(ed.). Culture and the Language Classroom. Honk Kong: Modern English</p><p>Publication and the British Council.</p><p></p><p>Clarke, R. (2018). Why Wales is known as the Land of Song. Retrieved on 23rd</p><p>March, 2021 from http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20180930-why-wales-isknown-</p><p>as-the-land-of-song</p><p></p><p>Copple, C. & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early</p><p>childhood programs. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of</p><p>Young Children.</p><p></p><p>Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. X. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the</p><p>EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and</p><p>learning (pp. 196-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Council of Europe (2001). A Common European Framework of Reference for</p><p>Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.</p><p></p><p>Crawford, M. (2017) Pulse 2 Students Book. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Desa Fikir</p><p>Sdn.Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Crawford, M. (2017). Pulse 2 Form 1 Students Book Online. Retrived on 14th June,</p><p>2021 from http://online.anyflip.com/npnjz/djyc/mobile/index.html</p><p></p><p>Creswell J.W. & Plano Clark V.L.(2011) Designing and conducting mixed method</p><p>research. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research. New York: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed</p><p>Methods Approaches. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks. London: Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced</p><p>mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),</p><p>Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209240).</p><p>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p></p><p>Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials.</p><p>Oxford: Heinemann Publishers Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.</p><p></p><p>David, L. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages:</p><p>Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Journal of Language Teaching, 39</p><p>(3), 167-190.</p><p></p><p>Edge, J., & Wharton, S.(1998). Autonomy and Development: Living in the</p><p>Materials World. In B.Tomlinson (Ed.)(1998) in Materials Development in</p><p>Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 295-310.</p><p></p><p>Elomaa, E. (2009). Oppikirjaelkn!</p><p>Teoreettisiajakytnnnnkkohtiakieltenoppimateriaalienuudistamiseen.</p><p>Jyvskyl Studies in Humanities 122(1), 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory</p><p>analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and</p><p>Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.</p><p></p><p>Freund, L. S. (1990). Maternal regulation of children's problem-solving behavior and</p><p>its impact on children's performance. Child Development, 61, 113-126.</p><p></p><p>Fu, G.B.A (1975). A Hong Kong perspective: English language learning and the</p><p>Chinese students. (PhDs Thesis), The University of Michigan, USA.</p><p>Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali, M. (2008). A Reflection of the Revised Syllabus Translated in Textbooks.</p><p>Journal on International Management Studies, 1, 162-169.</p><p></p><p>Goh, Y. T. ., & Aziz, A. A. . (2020). Using Pulse 2 to Teach and Assess Malaysian</p><p>Pupils Speaking Skill. International Journal of Publication and Social</p><p>Studies, 5(1), 5568.</p><p></p><p>Harmer, J. (2007) The practice of English language teaching. (4th Ed.). Harlow:</p><p>Pearson Education Limited.</p><p></p><p>Harp, S. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning scientific text</p><p>and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive</p><p>interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92-102.</p><p></p><p>Hennebry, M. (2014). Cultural awareness: should it be taught? Can it be taught? In</p><p>P. Driscoll, E. Macaro, & A. Swerbrick (Eds.). Debates in modern languages</p><p>education. London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Holmes, J. (2008) An introduction to sociolinguistics. (3rd Ed.). Harlow: Pearson</p><p>Longman.</p><p></p><p>Hooi, S. K. (2015). Teachers evaluation of KBSM Form 4, 5 English textbooks</p><p>used in the secondary schools in Penang, Malaysia. Advances in Languages and</p><p>Literary Studies, 6(4), 128-150.</p><p></p><p>Hossain, M. E. (2009). English for Today. Retrieved on 2nd August, 2019 from</p><p>http://asianvu.com/bk/framework/wpcontent/uploads/2013/08/English_for_Toda</p><p>y_9-10.pdf</p><p></p><p>Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an</p><p>understanding of voice. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.</p><p></p><p>James, P. R., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Perceptions and Expectancies of Malaysian</p><p>Students on Cultural Elements in Foreign Textbooks. International Journal of</p><p>Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(4), 214231.</p><p></p><p>Kit, U.C. (2009). Reading and second language acquisition. Journal of Applied</p><p>Language Studies, 13(1), 153-174.</p><p></p><p>Krashen, S. and H. Seliger (1976). The role of formal and informal linguistic</p><p>environments in adult second language learning. International Journal of</p><p>Psycholinguistics, 3(1), 15-21.</p><p></p><p>Krashen, S. (1982). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning.</p><p>Oxford: Pergamon Press.</p><p></p><p>Lhdesmki, S. (2004). Oppikirja tutkijan ksiss. In T. Nevalainen, M. Rissanen &</p><p>I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Englannin aika: Elvn kielen kartoitusta (pp. 529-554).</p><p>Helsinki: WSOY.</p><p></p><p>Lappalainen, T. (2011). Presentation of the American culture in EFL textbooks: An</p><p>analysis of the cultural content of Finnish EFL textbooks for secondary and upper</p><p>secondary education. (Masters Thesis). University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.</p><p>Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Lightbrown, P. M., &Spada, N. (2006). Explaining second language learning. (3rd</p><p>Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Litz, D.R.A (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT Management: A South Korea Case</p><p>Study. (Masters Thesis). University Al Ain, UAE. Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Lobsy, J. (2012). Using Likert scale in evaluation survey work. Retrieved on March</p><p>25th, 2021 from https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/docs/cb_february_14_2012.pdf</p><p></p><p>Lopez-Rocha, S. (2016). Intercultural communicative competence: creating</p><p>awareness and promoting skills in the language classroom. Retrieved on</p><p>December, 18th 2021 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565040.pdf</p><p></p><p>Lusi, M., Joko, N., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Cultural content: An analysis of EFL</p><p>textbook in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research</p><p>Publications, 8(1), 192-199.</p><p></p><p>Macmillan Education. (2017). English Language Teaching [Pulse 2]. Retrieved on</p><p>September 10th, 2017 from http://www.macmillanelt.es/series/pulse-</p><p>2/#.W1KastUzbIU</p><p></p><p>Malaysian Education Blueprint. (2013-2025). Malaysian Education Blueprint.</p><p>Retrieved on March 5th, 2017 from</p><p>http://www4.unescobkk.org/nespap/sites/default/files/Preliminary-Blueprint-</p><p>ExecSummary-Eng_0.pdf</p><p></p><p>Maxwell, J. (2012) Conceptual Framework: What Do You Think Is Going On? In</p><p>Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. (pp.39-72). Thousand</p><p>Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>May, S. (2020). NASA Knows! Retrieved on 23rd March,</p><p>2021fromhttps://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasaknows/</p><p>what-is-the-iss-58.html</p><p></p><p>McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching.(2nd</p><p>Ed). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</p><p></p><p>Memon, A. M., Ting, H., Cheah, J., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F. & Cham, T.H. (2020).</p><p>Sample size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of</p><p>Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Mergentler, E. & Stinson, C. (1992). Psychotherapy Transcription Standards.</p><p>Psychotherapy Research, 2(2), 125-142.</p><p></p><p>Miller, J. (2014, November 30). A case for parkour. The Star Online. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/health/2014/11/30/a-case-for-parkour</p><p></p><p>Minh-Nguyen, T. (2015). Textbook evaluation: the case of English textbooks</p><p>currently in use at Vietnams upper-secondary school. (PhDs Thesis). Vietnam</p><p>National University, Hanoi. Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Circular. (2017). JPNJ.SPA (05)/600-3/32 JLD. 21(76).</p><p>Minoo, A. & Hemaseh, B. S. (2013). Evaluation of Total English Textbooks from</p><p>a cultural perspective. Journal of English as an International Language, 8(1), 3-</p><p>86.</p><p></p><p>Mohammad, K., Elham, K., & Nima, S. (2015). Textbook evaluation, A</p><p>conscientious look at American English File Series. Elixir International Journal,</p><p>80(1), 21-27.</p><p></p><p>Mohd, S. & Nurul, F.M. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Teachers</p><p>awareness and the challenges. The Southeast Asia Journal of English Language</p><p>Studies, 24(3), 168-183.</p><p></p><p>Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and</p><p>procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.</p><p></p><p>Mukundan, J. (2003). Readings on ELT material. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia Press.</p><p></p><p>Mukundan, J. (2007). Evaluation of English Language Textbooks: Some important</p><p>issues for consideration. Journal of NELTA, 12(1&2), 80-4.</p><p></p><p>Mukundan, J., & Rezvani Kalajahi (2013). Evaluation of Malaysian English language</p><p>teaching textbooks. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(1),</p><p>38-46.</p><p></p><p>Mulholland, J. (1991). The language of negotiation. London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>National Geographic. (2021). Endangered Species. Retrieved on March 27th, 2021</p><p>from https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/endangeredspecies/#:~:</p><p>text=Species%20become%20endangered%20for%20two,and%20los</p><p>s%20of%20genetic%20variation.&text=A%20loss%20of%20habitat%20can%2</p><p>0happen%20naturally.&text=Human%20activity%20can%20also%20contribute,</p><p>the%20habitat%20of%20native%20organisms.</p><p></p><p>Nazri, W.A.A, & Aziz, A.A. (2020). Content Analysis Of Pulse 2 Textbooks</p><p>Reading Texts. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 6(1),</p><p>68-90.</p><p></p><p>Neil, J. S. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Nemati, A. (2009). Evaluation of an ESL English course book: A step towards</p><p>systematic vocabulary evaluation. Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 91-99.</p><p>Nguyen, C.T. (2015) An Evaluation of the Textbook English 6: A case study from</p><p>secondary schools in Mekong Delta Provinces of Vietnam. (PhDs Thesis)</p><p>University of Sheffield, England. Unpublished</p><p></p><p>Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching critical perspectives for a new</p><p>century. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum</p><p></p><p>Niveen, R. E. S (2011). Evaluating the cultural content of English for Palestine</p><p>Secondary Stage Textbooks in the Light of Universal Trends. (Masters Thesis).</p><p>The Islamic University, Gaza. Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Norhana, A. (2009). Cultural elements in a Malaysian English language textbook.</p><p>Retrieved on 3rd July, 2019 from</p><p>http://ddms.usim.edu.my/bitstream/123456789/713/1/cultural%20elements%20i</p><p>n%20malaysian%20english%20language%20textbooks%20-%20my_caselt.pdf</p><p></p><p>Nurul, A. J., & Azlina, A. A (2019). Teachers perception on using the Pulse 2</p><p>textbook. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies, 2(1), 1-15.</p><p></p><p>Okeeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Review of</p><p>Contemporary Learning Research, An International Journal, 2(1), 1-13.</p><p></p><p>Patton, M. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies [except: Purposeful sampling].</p><p>In Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.) (pp. 230-247).</p><p>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p></p><p>Pohjanen, P. (2007). No better, no worse-but definitely different: The presentation</p><p>of target culture in two English textbook-series for Finnish secondary school</p><p>children.</p><p></p><p>Rahim, H. A., & Daghigh, A. J. (2019). Locally developed versus global textbooks:</p><p>An evaluation of cultural content in textbooks used in English language teaching</p><p>in Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 22(3), 317-331.</p><p></p><p>Rathakrishnan, M., Raman, A., Manvender Kaur, S & Mohd Yassin, K (2019). The</p><p>effectiveness of using Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Strategy in developing students</p><p>critical thinking skills. (Masters Thesis). Universiti Utara Malaysia.</p><p>Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Richards, J. C., Tung, P., & Ng, P. (1992). The culture of the English language</p><p>teacher: A Hong Kong example. RELC Journal, 23(1), 81-103.</p><p></p><p>Richards J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. United</p><p>States: Cambridge.</p><p></p><p>Risager, K. (1991). Cultural references in European textbooks: An evaluation of</p><p>recent tendencies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.</p><p></p><p>Rodriguez, A. R. (2018). Analysing Cultural Aspects in EFL Textbooks: A Skill-</p><p>Based Analysis. Journal of English Studies, 16(1), 281-300.</p><p></p><p>Rosler, D. (1994). German as Foreign Language. Stuttgart: Weimar Metzler.</p><p></p><p>Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing (2nd ed.): The art of</p><p>hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Sabbiri, F. (2017). Perceived view of teachers towards Pentaksiran Tingkatan Tiga</p><p>(PT3) (Form Three Assessment) English Language: A case study. Asian Journal</p><p>of University Education, 15(3), 34 - 44.</p><p></p><p>Saidatul, A.I (2014). Factors affecting the implementation of information literacy</p><p>education in Malaysian Primary Schools. (Doctorate Thesis). University of</p><p>Wellington, Australia. Unpublished.</p><p></p><p>Scrivener, J. (2011) Learning teaching: The essential guide to English Language</p><p>Teaching. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Macmillan Publishers Limited.</p><p></p><p>Song, H.S.Y., Murphy, A. & Farley, H. (2013). Mobile devices for learning in</p><p>Malaysia: Then and now. In H. Carter, M. Gosper and J. Hedberg (Eds.),</p><p>Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney. (pp.830-834)</p><p></p><p>Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (1999). Retrieved on</p><p>December 19th, 2018 from</p><p>http://www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3324</p><p></p><p>Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research.</p><p>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>The Star Online. (2018, February, 4). Building on a benchmark. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2018/02/04/building-on-abenchmark/</p><p></p><p>Tomlinson, B. (2011) Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge:</p><p>Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.</p><p></p><p>Tuomi, J., & Sarajrvi (2009). Qualitative research and content analysis. Helsinki:</p><p>Tammi.</p><p></p><p>Umar, I.N & Yusoff, M. T. (2014). A study on Malaysian teachers level of ICT</p><p>skills and practices, and its impact on teaching and learning. Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences Journal, 116(1), 979-984.</p><p></p><p>Ur, P. (1996) A course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge</p><p>University Press, Cambridge.</p><p></p><p>Valverde, G., Bianchi, L., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W. & Houang, R. (2002), According</p><p>to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice</p><p>through the world of textbooks. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers</p><p></p><p>Vygotsky, L.S. (1920). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological</p><p>processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>William, M. K. (2006). Descriptive statistics. Retrieved on December 10th, 2019 from</p><p>http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php</p><p></p><p>Wong, P.W.L. (2011). Textbook evaluation, a framework for evaluating the fitness</p><p>of the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) Curriculum. (Masters Thesis).</p><p>City University, Hong Kong. Unpublished</p><p></p><p>Ya Shak, M.S., Malik, N. A., Hasni, N. A., &Tahir, M.H. (2021). Revisiting PULSE</p><p>2 Textbook after three years: Have teachers changed their mind?. Malaysian</p><p>Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(5), 177-189.</p><p></p><p>Ya Shak, M.S., Albakri, I.S.M.A., Tahir, M.H..M, & Adam, M. H. M. (2021) The</p><p>Use of Imported CEFR-aligned English Language Textbooks in Malaysian</p><p>Schools: Issues and Concerns. International Journal of Academic Research in</p><p>Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 954-963.</p><p></p><p>Ying, T.G, & Aziz, A.A. (2020). Using Pulse 2 to teach and assess Malaysian pupils</p><p>speaking skill. International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, 5(1), 55-</p><p>68.</p><p></p><p>Yuen, K.M. (2011). The representation of foreign cultures in English textbooks. ELT</p><p>Journal, 65, 458466.</p><p></p><p>Zuraidah, M. D. (2015). English Language Education Reform in Malaysia: The</p><p>Roadmap 2015-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |