Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat
<p>Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas</p><p>Tingkatan Empat berban...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9062 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9062 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
|
| spellingShingle |
Seow, Yea Pyng Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas</p><p>Tingkatan Empat berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional chalk-and-talk. Instrumen kajian yang</p><p>digunakan ialah Ujian Pra dan Ujian Pencapaian, rancangan mengajar harian dan soal selidik. Kajian</p><p>ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan reka bentuk eksperimen kuasi. Responden kajian terdiri daripada</p><p>64 orang pelajar Tingkatan Empat di sebuah sekolah menengah Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak. Seramai 34</p><p>orang pelajar dari sebuah kelas dijadikan kumpulan rawatan yang mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti</p><p>pembelajaran aktif, sementara 30 orang pelajar dari satu kelas lagi dijadikan kumpulan kawalan yang</p><p>mengikuti kaedah tradisional chalk-and-talk. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik Analisis</p><p>Kovarians (ANCOVA) dan Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan. Hasil ANCOVA menunjukkan terdapat kesan</p><p>kaedah pembelajaran aktif yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar berbanding dengan</p><p>kaedah pengajaran tradisional chalk -and-talkbagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat.</p><p>Manakala hasil analisis Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan minat</p><p>dan motivasi para pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktiviti- aktiviti pembelajaran</p><p>aktif dalam kelas Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Namun begitu, tiada peningkatan interaksi sosial di</p><p>kalangan pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif.</p><p>Implikasi dapatan kajian ini mencadangkan bahawa pihak guru, pentadbir sekolah dan KPM wajar</p><p>menggalakkan dan memperluaskan pengaplikasian kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam proses</p><p>pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat untuk</p><p>meningkatkan lagi pencapaian akademik, minat dan motivasi pelajar terbabit.</p><p></p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Seow, Yea Pyng |
| author_facet |
Seow, Yea Pyng |
| author_sort |
Seow, Yea Pyng |
| title |
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| title_short |
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| title_full |
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| title_fullStr |
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| title_sort |
persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9062 |
| _version_ |
1776104592654729216 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:90622023-06-15 Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran ekonomi asas tingkatan empat 2011 Seow, Yea Pyng <p>Kajian ini dijalankan untuk menilai keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian akademik, minat, motivasi dan interaksi sosial pelajar bagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas</p><p>Tingkatan Empat berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional chalk-and-talk. Instrumen kajian yang</p><p>digunakan ialah Ujian Pra dan Ujian Pencapaian, rancangan mengajar harian dan soal selidik. Kajian</p><p>ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan reka bentuk eksperimen kuasi. Responden kajian terdiri daripada</p><p>64 orang pelajar Tingkatan Empat di sebuah sekolah menengah Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak. Seramai 34</p><p>orang pelajar dari sebuah kelas dijadikan kumpulan rawatan yang mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti</p><p>pembelajaran aktif, sementara 30 orang pelajar dari satu kelas lagi dijadikan kumpulan kawalan yang</p><p>mengikuti kaedah tradisional chalk-and-talk. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik Analisis</p><p>Kovarians (ANCOVA) dan Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan. Hasil ANCOVA menunjukkan terdapat kesan</p><p>kaedah pembelajaran aktif yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar berbanding dengan</p><p>kaedah pengajaran tradisional chalk -and-talkbagi mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat.</p><p>Manakala hasil analisis Ujian-T Sampel Berpasangan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan minat</p><p>dan motivasi para pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktiviti- aktiviti pembelajaran</p><p>aktif dalam kelas Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat. Namun begitu, tiada peningkatan interaksi sosial di</p><p>kalangan pelajar yang signifikan selepas mereka mengikuti aktiviti-aktiviti pembelajaran aktif.</p><p>Implikasi dapatan kajian ini mencadangkan bahawa pihak guru, pentadbir sekolah dan KPM wajar</p><p>menggalakkan dan memperluaskan pengaplikasian kaedah pembelajaran aktif dalam proses</p><p>pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan Empat untuk</p><p>meningkatkan lagi pencapaian akademik, minat dan motivasi pelajar terbabit.</p><p></p> 2011 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9062 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9062 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi <p>Abrami, P., Chamber, B., Poulsen, C., Simone, C.D., dAppollania, S., & Howden, J. (1995).</p><p>Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto: Harecourt Brace</p><p>Jovanovich.</p><p></p><p>Alexander, W.R.J., & McDougall, R.S. (2001). Collaborative problem solving in student learning.</p><p>Economics Discussion Papers No.0110, Department of Economics, University of Otago.</p><p></p><p>Armsden, G.C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Relationships</p><p>to well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454.</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacob, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education</p><p>(6 ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadswoth</p><p></p><p>Asmah Hj Ahmad (1989). Pedagogi I. Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Atkinson, J. (Ed.).</p><p>(1958). Motives in fantasy, action and society. New York: Van</p><p>Nostrand.</p><p></p><p>Bartlett, R.L. (2006). The evolution of cooperative learning and economics instruction. In W.E.</p><p>Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp.</p><p>39-58). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Becker, W.E. (1997). Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(9),</p><p>1347-1373.</p><p></p><p>Becker, W.E. (1998). Engaging student in quantitative analysis with the academic and popular press.</p><p>In W. E. Becker & M. Watts (Eds.), Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp.</p><p>241-267). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (1995). A review of teaching methods in undergraduate economics. Economic</p><p>Inquiry, 33(4), 692-700.</p><p></p><p>Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and talk: A national survey on teaching undergraduate</p><p>economics. American Economic Review, 86 (May), 448-453.</p><p></p><p>Becker, W.E., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21 century: Still chalk</p><p>and talk. American Economic Review, 91 (May), 446-451.</p><p></p><p>Beeby, C. (1966). The quality of education in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Beeby, C. (1986). The stages of growth in educational systems. In S. Heyneman & D. White (Eds.) The</p><p>quality of education and economic development: A World</p><p>Bank Symposium (pp. 3744). Washington, DC: World Bank.</p><p></p><p>Biggs, J.B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of</p><p>Educational Psychology, 48, 266-279.</p><p></p><p>Biggs, J.B., & Moore, P.J. (1993). The process of learning (3 ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals:</p><p>Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.</p><p></p><p>Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic</p><p>Press.</p><p></p><p>Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.</p><p>ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School</p><p>of Education and Human Development.</p><p></p><p>Borg, M.O., & Shapiro, S.L. (1996). Personality type and student performance in principles of</p><p>economics. The Journal of Economics Education, 27(1), 3-25.</p><p></p><p>Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity.</p><p>Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071</p><p></p><p>Brokaw, A.J., & Merz, T.E. (2004). Active learning with Monty Hall in a game theory class. Journal</p><p>of Economic Education, 35(3), 259-268.</p><p></p><p>Brooks, T.B., & Khandker, A.W. (2002). A colloborative learning lab: Does the form matter?.</p><p>Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(3), 330-338.</p><p></p><p>Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>Buckles, S., & Hoyt, G.M. (2006). Using active learning techniques in large lecture classes. In</p><p>W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk</p><p>(pp. 75-88). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Budd, J.W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. Journal of Economics Education, 35(1), 35-46.</p><p></p><p>Burden, P.R., & Byrd, D.M. (1994). Methods for effective teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Carlson, J., & Schodt, D. (1995). Beyond the lecture case teaching and the learning of economic</p><p>theory. Journal of Economic Education, 26(Winter), 17-28.</p><p></p><p>Carlson, J.L., & Skaggs, N.T. (2000). Learning by trial and error: A case for moot courts. Journal</p><p>of Economic Education, 31(2), 145-155.</p><p></p><p>Carlson, J.A., & Velenchik, A. (2006). Using the case method in the economics classroom. In W.E.</p><p>Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp.</p><p>59-74). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Carpick, R.W. (2002). Who wants to be an engineer? or better teaching through games shows.</p><p>Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition</p><p>(session 1630). Montreal, Canada: American Society for Engineering Education.</p><p></p><p>Chee, K.M. (1996). Pandangan pelajar terhadap kaedah pengajaran guru Prinsip Akaun, Perdagangan dan</p><p>Ekonomi Asas di beberapa buah sekolah menengah di Pulau Pinang. Jurnal Pendidikan GERAK, 7, 23-28.</p><p></p><p>Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice. AAHE Bulletin, 39</p><p>(Mac), 3-7.</p><p></p><p>Christoffersen, S. (2002). An active learning tool for the principles of economics: The allocation</p><p>exercise. American Economist, 46(2), 65-68.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Buku 1: Kaedah penyelidikan.</p><p>Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Cohn, C.L. (1999). Cooperative learning in macroeconomics course: A team simulation. College</p><p>Teaching, 47(2), 51-54.</p><p></p><p>Crandall, D.P. (1983). The teachers role in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 38, 6-9.</p><p></p><p>Cross, P.K. (1987). Teaching for learning. AAHE Bulletin, 39(April), 2-7.</p><p></p><p>de Baessa, Y., Chesterfield, R., & Ramos, T. (2002). Active learning and democratic behavior in</p><p>Guatemalan rural schools. Compare, 32(2), 205218.</p><p></p><p>Dixit, A. (2006). Restoring fun to game theory. In W.E. Becker, M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.)</p><p>Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 1- 20). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar</p><p>Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Effandi Zakaria & Abd. Razak Habib (2006). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif atas pelajar matrikulasi</p><p>dalam mata pelajaran matematik. Jurnal Teknologi, 45, 43- 62.</p><p></p><p>Fink, L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences; an integrated approach to designing</p><p>college courses. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass, A Wiley Imprint</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J.R. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3 ed.).</p><p>United States of America: Mcgraw-Hill, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Fredericksen, E. (1998). Minority students and the learning community experience: A cluster</p><p>experiment. TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p></p><p>Gay, L.R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research (7 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.</p><p></p><p>Ginsburg, M. (2009). Active-learning pedagogies as a reform initiative: Synthesis of case studies.</p><p>Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research under the EQUIP1 LWA. Diperoleh Ogos 1, </p><p>2010, daripada http://www.equip123.net/docs.</p><p></p><p>Gordon, R.R., Rogers, A.M., Comfort, M., Gavula, N., & McGee, B.P. (2001). A taste of problem-based</p><p>learning increases achievement in urban minority middle-school students. Educational Horizons,</p><p>79(4), 171-175.</p><p></p><p>Gourney, F.A. (2000). A classroom simulation based on political polling to help student understand</p><p>sampling distribution. Journal of Statistic Education, 8(3). Diperoleh Mac 10, </p><p>2008, daripada http://www.amstet.org/publication/jse/secure.</p><p></p><p>Grant, S. (2006). Professional development for teachers: Teaching and assessing skills in</p><p>economics. UK: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Gremmen, H., & Potters, J. (1997). Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economic education. Journal</p><p>of Economic Education, 28 (Fall), 291303.</p><p></p><p>Gunter, M.A. (1995). Instruction to models approach. New York: Allyn & Bacon. Hake, R. (1998).</p><p>Interactive-engagement vs. Traditional methods: a six-thousand-</p><p>student survey of mechanics test data for introductory Physics courses.</p><p>American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.</p><p></p><p>Halimah Harun (2002). Ke arah meningkatkan profesionalisme guru. Adakah pengajaran anda berkesan?</p><p>Prosiding Kebangsaan Profesion Perguruan (pp. 301-319). Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Hansen, W.L. (2001). Expected proficiencies for undergraduate economics majors.</p><p>Journal of Economic Education, 32 (Summer), 231-242.</p><p></p><p>Hansen, W.L., Salemi, M.K., & Siegfried, J.J. (2002). Use it or lose it: Teaching economic literacy</p><p>in the economics principles course. American Economic Review, 92(2), 463-472.</p><p></p><p>Harrison, S.D. (2003). A business simulation approach to activity based costing method in the</p><p>classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(3), 307-312.</p><p></p><p>Hazlett, D. (2006). Using classroom experiments to teach economics. In W.E. Becker,</p><p>M. Watts & S.R. Becker (Eds.) Teaching economics: More alternatives to chalk and talk (pp. 21-38).</p><p>Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review 1(2006),</p><p>6982.</p><p></p><p>Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood,</p><p>NJ USA: Ablex Publishing Corporation.</p><p></p><p>Holter, N.C. (1994). Team assignment can be effective cooperative learning techniques. Journal of</p><p>Business for Education, 69, 73-76.</p><p></p><p>Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara (2003, Januari). Ilmu dan latihan teras kecemerlangan</p><p>perkhidmatan awam. Teks ucapan Pengarah INTAN di Perhimpunan Bulanan JPA, Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Inter-Agency Commission (1990). World declaration on education for all. World conference on</p><p>education for all: Meeting basic learning needs. New York: Inter-Agency Commission.</p><p></p><p>Ismail Daros (1987). Faktor-faktor utama yang menyebabkan pelajar-pelajar di peringkat menengah</p><p>melakukan kegiatan ponteng sekolah. Kerja Ilmiah Diploma yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti</p><p>Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Jensen, E.J., & Owen, A.L. (2003). Appealing to good students in introductory economics. Journal of</p><p>Economic Education, 34(4), 299-325.</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive and</p><p>individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What</p><p>evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26-35.</p><p></p><p>Johnston, C.G., James, R.H., Lye, J.N., & McDonald, I.M. (2000). An evaluation of collaborative</p><p>problem solving for learning economics. Journal of Economics, 31(1), 13-29.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (1991). Buku panduan am penilaian kendalian sekolah menengah.</p><p>Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2000). Sukatan pelajaran kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah</p><p> Ekonomi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2001). Sukatan pelajaran kurikulum bersepadu sekolah rendah </p><p>Kajian Tempatan. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2005). Amalan terbaik pembelajaran aktif dalam Ekonomi Asas.</p><p>Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2006). Laporan kajian rintis buku panduan pembelajaran aktif</p><p>dalam Ekonomi Asas. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2010). Analisis keputusan peperiksaan SPM 2000-2009. Kuala</p><p>Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kensworthy, L.S. (1962). Guide to social studies teaching. New York: Woodsworth.</p><p></p><p>Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Foundation of behavioural research. (3 ed.). New York:</p><p>Rine Hart & Winston.</p><p></p><p>Khoo, Y. Y. (2008). Keberkesanan kaedah penyelesaian masalah secara kolaboratif dalam kalangan</p><p>pelajar Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam. Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A.W. Chickering (Ed.) The</p><p>Modern American College (pp. 232-255). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learnig and development.</p><p>Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical</p><p>considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383409.</p><p></p><p>Kurfiss, J.G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, pratice and possibilities. ASHE-ERIC</p><p>Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Kwan, V. N. (1989). Pencapaian murid-murid aliran sastera dalam mata pelajaran Rampaian Sains: Satu</p><p>kajian sekolah di Seremban. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1999). Promoting active learning using the results of</p><p>Physics education research. UniServe Science News, 13-20.</p><p></p><p>Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif.</p><p>Shah Alam: Mc Graw-Hill (Malaysia).</p><p></p><p>Lockheed, M., & Levin, H. (1991). Creating effective schools. In H. Levin & M. Lockheed (Eds.)</p><p>Effective schools in developing countries (pp. 120). Washington, DC: The World Bank, Education and</p><p>Employment Division, Population and Human Resources Department.</p><p></p><p>Lundwall, B. (2000). Towards a learning society. Innovation and competence building with social</p><p>cohesion for Europe. The Seminar On Socio-Economic Research and European Policy. Lisbon.</p><p></p><p>Maier, M.H., & Keenan, D. (1994). Cooperative learning in economics. Economic Inquiry, 32 (April),</p><p>358-361.</p><p></p><p>Manning, L.A., & Riordan, C.A. (2000). Using groupware software to support collaborative learning</p><p>in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 31(3), 244-252.</p><p></p><p>Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Litton Educational Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.</p><p>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Md. Yusoff Mohamed (1998). Persepsi pelajar tingkatan empat sekolah menengah kebangsaan Munshi</p><p>Abdullah Kulai terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran Ekonomi Asas. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak</p><p>diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mergendoller J.R, Maxwell, N.L., & Bellisimo Y. (2002). The effectiveness of problem based</p><p>instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Human</p><p>Investment Research and Education (HIRE) Center: California State University.</p><p></p><p>Meyers, C., & Jones, T.B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom.</p><p>San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school</p><p>mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424 436.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Zakaria (1997). Persepsi pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran Ekonomi. Kajian di sekolah</p><p>menengah daerah Bachok, Kelantan. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti</p><p>Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Yahya Mohamed Ariffin (2001). Bidang ekonomi: Pelbagai sektor tawar pekerjaan. Diperoleh </p><p>pada Oktober 10, 2008, daripada http://www.tutor.com/my/tutor/dunia.</p><p></p><p>Mok, S. S. (2005). Nota ulangkaji dan latihan PTK: Kompetensi khusus/ fungsi.</p><p>Puchong: Multimedia-ES Resources Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Mook, D. G. (1986). Motivation: The organization of action. New York: Norton.</p><p></p><p>Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (4 ed.).</p><p>Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Niemi, H. (1997). Active learning by teachers. In D. Stern & G.L. Huber (Eds.) Active learning for</p><p>students and teachers. Reports from eight countries (pp. 174-182). OECD. Frankfurt am Main: Peter</p><p>Lang.</p><p></p><p>Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning a cultural change needed in teacher education and schools.</p><p>Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 763-780.</p><p></p><p>Nor Azian Ahmad (2008). Kaedah pembelajaran dan pengajaran koperatif bagi tajuk Ikatan Kovalen</p><p>Tingkatan Empat. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan</p><p>Idris.</p><p></p><p>Oliver, P. (Ed.). (1999). Monitoring change in education. Lifelong and continuing education. What</p><p>is a learning society. Aldershot: Ashgate, Arena.</p><p></p><p>Omar Hassan (1975). An investigation into factors effecting science interest of secondary school</p><p>students. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 23, 255- 268.</p><p></p><p>Othman Lebar (2007). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod.</p><p>Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Paul, R.B., & David, M.B. (1999). Method of effective teaching. Needham Heights, MA: Ally & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Piaget, J. (1969). Science of education and the psychology of the child. London: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Pintrich, R.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of</p><p>classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.</p><p></p><p>Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering</p><p>Education, 93(3), 223-231.</p><p></p><p>Ramlee Ismail (2003). Pengaruh Matematik dan Ekonomi Asas sebagai prasyarat ke atas pencapaian</p><p>Prinsip Ekonomi di UPSI. Laporan Penyelidikan Jangka Pendek. Tanjong Malim: UPSI.</p><p></p><p>Raymond, F., Raymond, A., & McCrickard, M. (2008). Stuck behind the Math: Just how helpful can one</p><p>expect technology to be in the Economics classroom? International Review of Economics Education,</p><p>7(1), 62-102.</p><p></p><p>Redish, E., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1997). On the effectiveness of active- engagement</p><p>microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 45-50.</p><p></p><p>Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental</p><p>issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement</p><p>motivation (pp. 173195). San Diego: Academic Press.</p><p></p><p>Rosziah Salleh, Abidah A. Bakar & Rashida Abdul Raffar (2005). Keberkesanan pembelajaran koperatif</p><p>dalam meningkatkan penguasaan pelajar hayat terhadap isi kandungan mata pelajaran Biologi</p><p>serta mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar. Dalam Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Program</p><p>Matrikulasi Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Johor Bahru: Kolej Matrikulasi Melaka.</p><p></p><p>Roziah Hj. Md. Amin (2007). Pembangunan perisian isi rumah sebagai pengguna bagi pengajaran dan</p><p>pembelajaran berbantukan komputer Ekonomi Asas Tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan.</p><p>Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Ruckstad, M.G. (1992). Macroeconomic decision making in the world economy text and cases, (3</p><p>ed.). Fort Worth: Tex Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.</p><p></p><p>Rusell, J.D. (1974). Modular instruction. Minnepolis: Burgess Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Salemi, M.K. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Southern Economic</p><p>Journal, 68(3), 721-731.</p><p>Sarantakos, S. (1997). Social research. South Melbourne, Australia: MacMillan Education.</p><p></p><p>Sax, L.J., Astin, A., Arredondo, M., & Korn, W. (1996). The American college teacher: National</p><p>norms for the 199596 HERI faculty survey. CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of</p><p>California.</p><p></p><p>Sazali Yusoff (1996). Peningkatan prestasi Matematik bagi pelajar-pelajar Tingkatan 2 sekolah luar</p><p>bandar: Suatu tinjauan terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran koperatif. Seminar Kebangsaan</p><p>Penilaian KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.),</p><p>Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 197223). New York: Taylor Francis.</p><p></p><p>Schloss, P.J., & Smith, M.A. (1999). Conducting research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice</p><p>Hall.</p><p></p><p>Schmidt, S. J. (2003). Active and cooperative learning using web-based simulations.</p><p>Journal of Economic Education, 34(2), 151-167.</p><p></p><p>Schumann, L., Rogers, R.P., & Reitzes, J.D. (1992). Case studies on the price effects of horizontal</p><p>mergers. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.</p><p></p><p>Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi- experimental designs</p><p>for generalized causal inference. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.</p><p></p><p>Shahril Marzuki, Quek, A. H., & Chang, L. H. (1994). Ekonomi Asas strategi pengajaran dan</p><p>pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Siegfried, J.J., Bartlett, R., Hansen, W.L., Kelley, A.C., McClosky, D.N., & Tietenberg, T.H.</p><p>(1991). The status and prospects of the economics major. Journal of Economic Education, 22(3),</p><p>195-224.</p><p></p><p>Silberman, M.L. (2004). Pembelajaran Aktif: 101 Strategi untuk mengajar apa jua subjek (Zainab</p><p>Ahmad, Terjemah). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Berhad. (Karya asli diterbitkan</p><p>1996).</p><p></p><p>Simon, P.R.J. (1997). Definitions and theories of active learning. In D. Stern & G.L. Huber (Eds.)</p><p>Active learning for students and teachers. Reports from eight countries (pp. 19-39). OECD.</p><p>Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.</p><p></p><p>Siti Asiah Nor @ Moh Nor (2006). Keberkesanan kaedah permainan ke atas pencapaian, sikap dan minat</p><p>pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran Prinsip Perakaunan Tingkatan IV. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak</p><p>diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R.E. (1990). Research on co-operative learning: Consensus and controversy.</p><p>Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice.</p><p>Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R.E. (1997). Co-operative learning among students. In D. Stern & G.L. Huber (Eds.) Active</p><p>learning for students and teachers. Reports from eight countries (pp. 159-173). OECD. Frankfurt am</p><p>Main: Peter Lang.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R.E., & Hansell, S. (1983). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations: Contact theory</p><p>in the classroom. In J.L., Epstein & N., Karweit (Ed.) Friend in school: Pattern of selection and</p><p>influence in secondary schools (pp. 93-114). New York: Academic Press.</p><p></p><p>Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (3 ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Strow, B.K., & Strow, C.W. (2006). A rent-seeking experiment for the classroom.</p><p>Journal of Economic Education, 37 (3), 323-330.</p><p></p><p>Subahan Mohd Merah (1997). Strategi pengajaran untuk meningkatkan prestasi Sains dan Matematik.</p><p>Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Suhaida Abdul Kadir (2002). Perbandingan pembelajaran koperatif dan tradisional terhadap prestasi,</p><p>atribusi pencapaian, konsep kendiri akademik dan hubungan sosial dalam pendidikan Perakaunan.</p><p>Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Syarifah Alwiah Alsagoff (1986). Ilmu pendidikan pedagogi. Kuala Lumpur: Heineman Asia.</p><p>Thorndike, E. (1913). Educational psychology: The psychology of learning. New York: Teachers</p><p>College Press.</p><p></p><p>Toh, W. S. (2008). Pedagogi pembelajaran aktif dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Ekonomi ke arah</p><p>membangunkan modal insan. Seminar Inovasi Pedagogi IPBL 2008 (pp. 117-129). Kuching, Sarawak:</p><p>Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang.</p><p></p><p>Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers? Approaches to</p><p>teaching and students? Approaches to learning. Higher Education, 39, 57-70.</p><p></p><p>Ueckert, C.W., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2008). Active learning strategies. Science Teacher, 75(9),</p><p>47-52.</p><p></p><p>UNESCO (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all: Meeting our collective</p><p>commitments. World Education Forum. Dakar, Senegal: UNESCO Publishing.</p><p></p><p>UNESCO (2008). EFA global monitoring report, 2008: Education for all by 2015.</p><p>Will we make it? Oxford University Press & UNESCO Publishing.</p><p></p><p>USAID (2005). Education strategy: improving lives through learning. Washington, DC: USAID.</p><p></p><p>Velenchik, A.D. (1995). The case method as a strategy for teaching policy analysis to</p><p>undergraduates. Jounal of Economic Education, 26 (Winter), 29-38.</p><p></p><p>White Paper on Education and Training (1995). Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.</p><p></p><p>Whiting, C. (2006). Data-based active learning in the principles of Macroeconomics course: A mock</p><p>FOMC meeting. Journal Economics of Education, 37(2), 171- 177.</p><p></p><p>Wollman (1969). Dictionary of behaviour science. New York: Reinhold.</p><p></p><p>Zaharatul Laili Abdul Rahim & Ramlee Mustapha (2007). Pembelajaran berasaskan masalah bagi subjek</p><p>elektronik: Satu kajian tindakan di sekolah teknik. Seminar Pendidikan Kejuruteraan dan Alam Bina</p><p>(pp. 230-251). Bangi:Penerbitan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p> |