Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan penggunaan Kahoot! sebagai alat penilaian</p><p>formatif terhadap penglibatan, motivasi dan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif</p><p>dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen tel...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9257 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9257 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Ruhana Jakian@Jamludin Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan penggunaan Kahoot! sebagai alat penilaian</p><p>formatif terhadap penglibatan, motivasi dan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif</p><p>dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan 60</p><p>responden tingkatan satu di sebuah sekolah di daerah Keringau, Sabah yang mengambil</p><p>mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu adalah menggunakan teknik kumpulan kawalan setara ujian</p><p>pra/ujian pasca (non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest).Dua jenis instrumen kajian</p><p>yang digunakan iaitu borang soal selidik dan ujian pra dan pasca. Data dianalisis</p><p>menggunakan statistik inferensi yang melibatkan ujian-t bebas untuk melihat perbezaan</p><p>pencapaian pelajar mengikut kaedah pelaksanaan kuiz yang dijalankan. Manakala analisis</p><p>deskriptif berdasarkan taburan frekuensi iaitu menunjukkan peratus dan kekerapan untuk</p><p>menjelaskan tahap penglibatan dan motivasi pelajar. Ujian terhadap skor ujian pasca</p><p>menunjukkan wujud perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan eksperimen (M=5.20,</p><p>SP=1.75) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=3.53, SP= 1.07); t(58)=-4.41, p<.001(p<.05). Hasil</p><p>dapatan menunjukkan penglibatan (M=3.53, SP=0.53) dan motivasi (M=3.48, SP=0.65)</p><p>pelajar kumpulan rawatan juga berada pada tahap tinggi apabila menggunakan Kahoot!</p><p>sebagai alat penilaian formatif. Kesimpulannya, penggunaan Kahoot! sebagai alat</p><p>penilaian telah meningkatkan motivasi, penglibatan dan memberi kesan kepada pencapaian</p><p>pelajar dalam bilik darjah. Implikasi daripada kajian ini, penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot!</p><p>sebagai alat bantu pengajaran dan pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan pencapaian, motivasi</p><p>dan penglibatan bagi mata pelajaran yang berbentuk bahasa.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Ruhana Jakian@Jamludin |
| author_facet |
Ruhana Jakian@Jamludin |
| author_sort |
Ruhana Jakian@Jamludin |
| title |
Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| title_short |
Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| title_full |
Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| title_fullStr |
Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu |
| title_sort |
kesan penggunaan aplikasi kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran bahasa melayu |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9257 |
| _version_ |
1776104608854179840 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:92572023-07-24 Kesan penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot sebagai alat penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu 2021 Ruhana Jakian@Jamludin LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti kesan penggunaan Kahoot! sebagai alat penilaian</p><p>formatif terhadap penglibatan, motivasi dan pencapaian pelajar. Pendekatan kuantitatif</p><p>dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan 60</p><p>responden tingkatan satu di sebuah sekolah di daerah Keringau, Sabah yang mengambil</p><p>mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu adalah menggunakan teknik kumpulan kawalan setara ujian</p><p>pra/ujian pasca (non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest).Dua jenis instrumen kajian</p><p>yang digunakan iaitu borang soal selidik dan ujian pra dan pasca. Data dianalisis</p><p>menggunakan statistik inferensi yang melibatkan ujian-t bebas untuk melihat perbezaan</p><p>pencapaian pelajar mengikut kaedah pelaksanaan kuiz yang dijalankan. Manakala analisis</p><p>deskriptif berdasarkan taburan frekuensi iaitu menunjukkan peratus dan kekerapan untuk</p><p>menjelaskan tahap penglibatan dan motivasi pelajar. Ujian terhadap skor ujian pasca</p><p>menunjukkan wujud perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan eksperimen (M=5.20,</p><p>SP=1.75) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=3.53, SP= 1.07); t(58)=-4.41, p<.001(p<.05). Hasil</p><p>dapatan menunjukkan penglibatan (M=3.53, SP=0.53) dan motivasi (M=3.48, SP=0.65)</p><p>pelajar kumpulan rawatan juga berada pada tahap tinggi apabila menggunakan Kahoot!</p><p>sebagai alat penilaian formatif. Kesimpulannya, penggunaan Kahoot! sebagai alat</p><p>penilaian telah meningkatkan motivasi, penglibatan dan memberi kesan kepada pencapaian</p><p>pelajar dalam bilik darjah. Implikasi daripada kajian ini, penggunaan aplikasi Kahoot!</p><p>sebagai alat bantu pengajaran dan pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan pencapaian, motivasi</p><p>dan penglibatan bagi mata pelajaran yang berbentuk bahasa.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9257 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9257 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif <p>Abdulahi, A. A., NorHidayati, Z., & Elmi, A. H. (2012). An evaluation of virtual learning environment readiness in higher education institutions (HEIs). Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 2, 8694.</p><p>Abdullah Ibrahim (2004). Pembelajaran Berpusatkan Pelajar Dan Kaitannya Dengan Pembangunan Diri Dan Peluang Pekerjaan, Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru Peringkat Kebangsaan 2004</p><p>Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.</p><p>Akhtar, M. I. (2016). Research Design. Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 68.</p><p>Alexander, B. (2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Educause Review, 39(5), 2835.</p><p>Alf Inge Wang, Meng Zhu & Rune Stre (2016). The Effect of Digitizing and Gamifying Quizzing in Classrooms. Norway : Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.</p><p>Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2014). Increasing Access through Mobile Learning. Perspectives on open and distance learning: increasing access through mobile learning. (p. 238).</p><p>Ambigapathy, P. dan Shanti, B. B. (2004). Technological literacy for adults: insights from Malaysia. Di dalam Kell, P., Shore, S. dan Singh, M. (ed.). Adult education 21st century. New York: Peter Lang.</p><p>Angelo, T. A. (1995). Improving classroom assessment to improve learning: Guidelines from research and practice. Assessment Update, 7(6), 12.</p><p>Angus, S. D., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2): 255-272.</p><p>Asoodeh, M. H., Asoodeh, M. B., & Zarepour, M. (2012). The Impact of Student - Centered Learning on Academic Achievement and Social Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 560564.</p><p>Ayhan Kaya & Nuri Balta (2016). Taking Advantages of Technologies: Using the Socrative in English Language Teaching Classes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, Vol.2, No.3.</p><p>Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Its Pros and Cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.</p><p>Bednar, AK, Cunningham, D, Duffy, TM & Perry, JD (1992), Theory into Practice: How Do We Link in Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction, eds. Duffy & Jonassen, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp.17-34.</p><p>Bell, B & Cowie,B (2002). Formative Assessment and Science Education. New Zealand : University of Waikato, Hamilton.</p><p>Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 21-23. </p><p>Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2006) Research in Education. 10th Edition, Pearson Education Inc., Cape Town.</p><p>Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65-79.</p><p>Bryman, A. (2008) Social research methods. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press., New York.</p><p>Budiati, B. (2017). Ict (Information and Communication Technology) Use: Kahoot Program for English Studentslearning Booster. In Proceedings Education and Language International Conference. 1(1).</p><p>Burke, B. (2014). Why Gamification Is Not a Game, CIO Journal.</p><p>Carlgren. T. (2013). Communication, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving: A Suggested For All High School Students in the 21st Century. Interchange, 44, 63-81.</p><p>Cervone, Barbara and Cushman, Kathleen. (2012). Teachers at Work, Six Exemplars of Everyday Practice. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future and the Nellie Mae Education Foundation.</p><p>Chantzi, A. E., Plessa, C., Gkanas, I. C., Tsolis, D., & Tsakalidis, A. (2013). Design and Development of Educational Platform in Augmented Reality Environment using Gamification to enhance Traditional , Electronic and Lifelong Learning Experience Categories and Subject Descriptors. BCI13, i, 9295.</p><p>Cheng, C. H., & Su, C. H. (2012). A Game-based learning system for improving students learning effectiveness in system analysis course. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 31, pp. 669675).</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.</p><p>Dano-Hinosolango. M.A and Vedua-Dinagsao, A. (2014). The Impact of Learner-Centered Teaching on Students Learning Skills and Strategies. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), (Volume 5, Issue 4), 1813-1817.</p><p>Darling-Hammond, L. & Adamson, F. (2010). Beyond Basic Skills: The Role of Performance Assessment in Achieving 21st Century Standards of Learning. Stanford, CA. Stanford Century for Opportunity Policy in Education.</p><p>Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Col lier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education--A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91.</p><p>Delacruz, G. C. (2011). Games as formative assessment environments: Examining the impact of explanations of scoring and incentives on math learning, game performance, and help seeking. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A Humanities and Social Sciences, 72, 1170.</p><p>Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A Digital Game Resource for Learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 12(4): 49-52.</p><p>Deterding, S., OHara, K., Sicart, M., Dixon, D., & Nacke, L. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 24252428).</p><p>Din, H. A. M., Arifin, A. N. Z., Masrop, N. A. M., Salleh, N. M. M., & Ahmad, I. F. (2014). Transformasi Pendidikan Melalui Pendekatan Permainan Digital Di Dalam Sistem Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 6771.</p><p>Dio, R. V. (2015). Game Development as Students Engagement Project in High School Mathematics. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 110119.</p><p>Duffy, T. M., and Cunningham, D. J., (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and deliveryof instruction, D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communicationsand Technology, NY: Macmillan Library Reference USA.</p><p>Dunemn, K. N., Roehrs, C. J., & Wilson, V. L. (2016). Critical appraisal and selection of data collection instruments: A step-by-step guide. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(3).</p><p>Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.</p><p>Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Guide to the Principles,Goals, and Methods of Determining College Outcomes. Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Fah, L. Y., Lee, C. S., Adnan, H., & Fook, F. S. (2016). Gamification at Universiti Malaysia Sabah: A case study of enhancing English among undergraduate students. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 5772.</p><p>Faizah Jaapar (2017). Bahan Bantu Mengajar (Bbm) Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran (P&P) Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan (Smk) Daerah Pontian. Johor : Penerbit Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.</p><p>Fauziah Ahmad & Jamaludin Badusah (2017). Persepsi Murid Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Socrative Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Rendah. Seminar Pendidikan Serantau Ke-VIII.</p><p>Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.</p><p>Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. American Educational Research Association.</p><p>Gagne, R.M., & Briggs, L.J., (1979). Principle of Instructional Design, New Yorks: Holt Rinehart and Winston.</p><p>Gagne, R.A. dan Driscoll, M.P. (1988). Essential of Learning for Instruction. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.</p><p>Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice, Second edition. E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice, Second Edition (pp. 1166). Taylor and Francis.</p><p>Gelisli, Y. (2009). The Effect Of Student Centered Instructional Approaches On Student Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 469473.</p><p>Good T.L, Brophy J.E (1994). Looking in classrooms. Harper Collins, College Publishers.</p><p>Gopal, V, (2003). Kemahiran Asas Sosial Kanak-Kanak Autisme Di Persekitaran Sekolah. Sabah : Penerbit Maktab Perguruan Keningau.</p><p>Glasersfeld E. von (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in education. Erlbaum, Hillsdale: 315</p><p>Graham, K. (2015). TechMatters: Getting into Kahoot!(s) : Exploring a Game-based Learning System to Enhance Student Learning. LOEX Quarterly. 42(3): 4.</p><p>Gronlund, N.E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.</p><p>Grove, N. P., & Lowery Bretz, S. (2012). A Continuum of Learning: From Rote Memorization to Meaningful Learning in Organic Chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13(3), 201208.</p><p>Gn, S., & Kuzu, A. (2014). Factors Influencing Student Engagement and the Role of Technology in Student Engagement in Higher Education: Campus-Class-Technology Theory. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4).</p><p>Hairol Anuar (2010). Pengajian Malaysia: Kenegaraan dan Patriotisme (Edisi Kedua). Bandar Seri Putra: Pusat Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan Akademik KUIS</p><p>Halim, F. H. B. A., & Aris, N. S. B. (2017). Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Teradun (Blended Learning). Journal on Technical and Vocational Education, 1(2), 5363.</p><p>Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social Motivations To Use Gamification : An Empirical Study Of Gamifying Exercise. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems SOCIAL (pp. 112).</p><p>Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170179.</p><p>Hamimi Wahab, F. A., Ayob, A., Zaki, W. M. D. W., Hussain, H., Hussain, A., & Mokri, S. S. (2011). Program outcomes measurement and assessment processes. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 18, pp. 4955).</p><p>Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science. 304(5670), 521522.</p><p>Hanis Najwa Shaharuddin, Ku Fatahiyah Ku Azizan, Wazzainab Ismail, Farah Nur Rashida Rosnan, & Norafidah Gordani. (2015). Tahap Motivasi Intrinsik dan Ekstrinsik Terhadap Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahfiz di Selangor. Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, 11.</p><p>Harlina, Nor, Z. M., & Ahmad, A. (2017). Pembelajaran Interaktif Berasaskan Aplikasi Kahoot dalam Pengajaran Abad Ke-21. Seminar Serantau, 627635.</p><p>Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., Najafi, V., & Nesari, A. J. (2011). What is mobile learning? Challenges and capabilities. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 30, pp. 24772481).</p><p>Haydon, Mackenzie, (2017). "Gaming the Education System: Interactive Game-Based Learning". All Regis University Theses. 808.</p><p>Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2004). Levels of teaching: A taxonomy for instructional design. Educational Technology. 44(6), 14-22.</p><p>Hox, J. J. dan Boeije, H. R. (2005). Data collection, primary vs secondary. Encyclopedia of social measurement, Vol. 1.</p><p>Icard, S. B. (2014). Educational Technology Best Practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 11(3): 37-41.</p><p>Ismail, M. A.-A., & Mohammad, J. A.-M. (2017). Kahoot: A Promising Tool for Formative Assessment in Medical Education. Education in Medicine Journal, 9(2), 1926.</p><p>Ismail, N. A., & Ahmad, Z. (2017). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Quizlet dan Kahoot IT dalam Memperkasakan Pengajaran Guru dan Memperkaya Pembelajaran Murid. E-Journal of the 5th Global Summit on Education GSE 2017, 3343.</p><p>Johdi Salleh, M., Frances Henry, J., & Rubin, M. (2012). Kajian Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Penilaian Menengah Rendah di Sabah. Labuan International Conference on Educational Research LICER 2012, (July), 57.</p><p>Johns, K. (2015). Engaging and Assessing Students with Technology: A Review of Kahoot!. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. 81(4): 89.</p><p>Yilmaz, K. (2008). Social Studies Teachers views of learner centered instruction. Eur.J.Teach Educ. Vol.31, no.1, pp.</p><p>Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer</p><p>Kim, Bohyun. (2013). "Gamification." Keeping Up With.... Asociation of College and Research Library.</p><p>Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C. & Hesse, F. W. (2012). Leveraging the Affordances of YouTube: The Role of Pedagogical Knowledge and Mental Models of Technology Functions for Lesson Planning with Technology. Computers & Education. 58(4): 1194-1206.</p><p>Kaput, K., (2018). Evidence for Student-Centered Learning. Education Evolving. Minnesota.</p><p>Licorish, S. A., George, J. L., Owen, H. E., & Daniel, B. (2017). Go kahoot! Enriching classroom engagement, motivation and learning experience with games. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2017 - Main Conference Proceedings (pp. 755764). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.</p><p>Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students perception of Kahoot!s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1).</p><p>Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of prior knowledge on learning from different compositions of representations in a mobile learning environment. Computers and Education, 72, 328338.</p><p>Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J., & Toprac, P. (2011). A study oflearning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 249-265.</p><p>Lorenzen, M (2001). Active Learning and Library Instruction. Illinois Libraries, v83 n2 p19-24.</p><p>Luqman, M., Nokman A.H., Yusoff, M.S., Mahpol, S. & Ahamad, M. (2017). Penggunaan Aplikasi Kahoot! Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab : Satu Tinjauan. Seminar Kebangsaan Bahasa Dan Kesusasteraan Arab (Sembara) Unisza 17.</p><p>Mafa, K. R. (2018). Capabilities of Google Classroom as a Teaching and Learning Tool in Higher Education. International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 38.</p><p>Maria C.A., Samsilah R., & Tajularipin S. (2014). Strategi pengajaran pembelajaran di institusi pengajian tinggi: Satu anjakan paradigma. Malaysian Education Dean Council Journal. 8, pp. 101-115.</p><p>McBrien, J.L. & Brandt, R.S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to education terms. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.</p><p>McKinley, J. (2015). Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing (PDF). Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 12(3): 184-207.</p><p>Medina, E. G. L., & Hurtado, C. P. R. (2017). Kahoot! A Digital Tool for Learning Vocabulary in a language classroom. Revista Publicando. 4(12 (1): 441-449.</p><p>Meyers, C. & Jones T.B (1993). Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom. Jossey-Bass Pte. Ltd. San Francisco.</p><p>Michael, E. A., Ejeng, I. E. A., Udit, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). The Use of Plickers for Language Assessment of Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1).</p><p>Miller, H. B., & Joshua Cuevas, G. A. (2017). Mobile Learning and its Effects on Academic Achievement and Student Motivation in Middle Grades Students. Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 91110).</p><p>Mohd Muhridza, N. H., Mohd Rosli, N. A., Sirri, A., & Abdul Samad, A. (2018). Using Game-based Technology, KAHOOT! for Classroom Engagement. LSP International Journal, 5(2).</p><p>Mok Soon Sang (2010). Falsafah dan Pendidikan Di Malaysia. Selangor: Multimedia Marketing Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Mokhtar Ismail (1995). Penilaian di Bilik Darjah. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Muhamad Suhaimi Taat, Mohd Yusof Abdullah, Baharom Mohamad, Roslee Talip, Abdul Said Ambotang, & Shukri Zain. (2012). Iklim sekolah berkesan pemangkin kecemerlangan. Utusan Borneo, p. B4.</p><p>Mullen, R. and Wedwick, L. 2008. Avoiding the Digital Abyss: Getting Started in the Classroom with Youtube, Digital Stories and Blogs. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 82(2): 66-69.</p><p>Murray, C., & Malmgren, K. (2005). Implementing a teacherstudent relationship program in a high-poverty urban school: Effects on social, emotional, and academic adjustment and lessons learned. Worchester, MA: Journal of School Psychology.</p><p>Musselman, Marija-Lisa, (2014). "The effect of game-based learning on middle school students' academic achievement" Graduate Research Papers. 211.</p><p>Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Education.</p><p>Noriati A. Rashid, Boon Pong Ying & Sharifah Fakhriah (2009). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Shah Alam:Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Novak, J. D. (2009). Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations: Second edition. Learning Creating and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations: Second Edition (pp. 1317). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.</p><p>Olatoye, F (2015). Evaluation of Online Formative Assessment in The Classroom: A Comparative Case Study of Kahoot And Socratives. Research paper: Technology enhanced learning. Academic Press.</p><p>Oliver, K. M. (2000). Methods for developing constructivism learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40 (6).</p><p>Orlich, Harder, Callahan, Trevisan & Brown. (2004). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 7th Ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.</p><p>Omar, N. N. (2017). The Efffectiveness of Kahoot Application Towards Students Good Feedback Practice. People: International Journal of Social Sciences. 3(2).</p><p>Ong, D., Yeng, C. Y., Hong, C. W., & Young, K. T. (2013). Motivation Of Learning : An Assessment Of The Practicality And Effectiveness Of Gamification Within A Tertiary Education. In World Academy of Researchers, Educators, and Scholars in Business, Social Sciences, Humanities and Education (In association with the Academy of World Finance, Banking, Management and IT) Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 131146)</p><p>Palmer,E & Devitt,P (2014). The Assessment of a Structured Online Formative Assessment Program: A Randomised Controlled Trial. BMC Medical Education 14, 8.</p><p>Pede, J., & Accardo, A. (2017). The Effects of the Online Game Kahoot on Science Vocabulary Acquisition. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 50.</p><p>Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H. and Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based Learning: Latest Evidence and Future Directions. Slough: NFER.</p><p>Pettiward, J. (2011). Putting the learn back into weblearn using a VLE to promote independent learning. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 7, 141 147.</p><p>Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the Classroom to Create Engagement and Active Learning: A Game-Based Technology Solution for eLearning Novices. Management Teaching Review. 2(2): 151-158. 48.</p><p>Premanand. E. M (2014). Gamification in The Classroom. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, Volume-2, Issue-5.</p><p>Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1, 1-4.</p><p>Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The Room Itself is Active: How Classroom Design Impacts Student Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces. 6(1): 26.</p><p>Roblyer, M. D. & Schwier, R. (2003). Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching (Canadian Ed). Toronto: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Rohana Yusof. (2004). Penyelidikan sains sosial (Edisi Kemas Kini). Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd</p><p>Rueda L., Benitez J., Braojos J. (2017). From traditional education technologies to student satisfaction in Management education: A theory of the role of social media applications, Information & Management, Volume 54, Issue 8, 1059-1071.</p><p>Saedah Siraj (2005). Mlearning Dalam Pembangunan Sekolah Berteknologi Di Malaysia: Prospek Pelaksanaan. (mLearning in the development for schools with technology in Malaysia: Implementation prospects). Paper presented at National Seminar on ICT in Education 2005, Tanjung Malim, 17-19th November.</p><p>Saedah Siraj & Norlidah Alias (2005). Pembelajaran Mobile dalam kurikulum masa depan. Jurnal Pendidikan, Journal on Isues of Education, 27, 115-126.</p><p>Schaaf, R. (2012). Does digital game-based learning improve student time-on-task behavior and engagement in comparison to alternative instructional strategies?. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(1 ), 50-64.</p><p>Sekaran, U. dan Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: a skill building approach fifth edition. United Kingdom: Wiley.</p><p>Shulman, L.S. & Grossman, P.L. (1987). Technical Report of the Knowledge Growth in a Profession Research Project. School of Education, Stanford University.</p><p>Siegle, D. (2015). Technology: Learning Can Be Fun and Games. Gifted Child Today. 38(3): 192-197.</p><p>Singer, N. (2016). Kahoot app brings urgency of a quiz show to the classroom. The New York Times.</p><p>Siti Fatimah Mohd Yassin (2001). Pengajaran pembelajaran bantuan komputer. UKM, Bangi.</p><p>Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creative thinking for learners in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 674679.</p><p>Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2005). The ASSURE Model: Creating the Learning Experience. In Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (pp. 45).</p><p>Suhazeli Abdullah (2012). Nota Pengenalan Asas SPSS. Researcher Soft Skill.</p><p>Shultz, G., Ellis,S., & Reif, G. (2016). A Qualitative Study of Student-Centered Learning Practices in New England High Schools. Boston, MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation and the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute</p><p>Tan, W. H., Johnston-Wilder, S., & Neill, S. (2008). Examining the potential of game -based learning through the eyes of maths trainee teachers, Proc. Br.Soc. Res. into Learn. Math, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 120 -124,</p><p>Tang, S., Hanneghan, M., & El Rhalibi, A. (2009). Introduction to Games-Based Learning. In T. Connolly, M. Stansfield, &L. Boyle (Eds.), Games Based Learning advancements for Multi-Sensory Human Computer Interfaces:Techniques and effective practices (pp. 1- 17). New York, NY: Hershey/IGI Global</p><p>Taylor, E. L. (2013). The Diffusion of Innovation. Research World, 2013(42), 5555.</p><p>Vero, E., & Puka, E. (2017). The Importance of Motivation in an Educational Environment. Formazione & Insegnamento, XV(1), 5766.</p><p>Wang, A. I. (2015). The Wear Out Effect of a Game-Based Student Response System. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.</p><p>Washor, E. & Mojkowski, C. (2013). Leaving to Learn: How Out-Of-School Learning Increases Student Engagement and Reduces Dropout Rates. Portsmouth, NH; Heinemann.</p><p>Wiersma, W. (2000). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction (7th Ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p>Wolfe, R., Steinberg, A., & Hoffman, N. (2013). Anytime, Anywhere: Student-Centered Learning for Schools and Teachers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p>Yan mei, S., Yan Ju, S., & Adam, Z. (2018). Implementing Quizizz as Game Based Learning in the Arabic Classroom. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(1), 194198.</p><p>Yang, Y. T. C., & Chang, C.H. (2013). Empowering students through digital game authorship: Enhancing concentration, critical thinking, and academic achievement. Computers & Education. 68, 334-344.</p><p>Zaffwan, M., Yusoff, S. & Wee Hoe, T. (2013). Permainan Digital: Pendekatan Baharu Dalam Pendidikan Masa Depan. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan ICT dalam Pendidikan.</p><p>Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot It or Not? Can Games be Motivating in Learning Grammar? Teaching English with Technology. 16(3): 17-36.</p><p>Zulkarnain, Z., Saim, M. & Abd Talib, R. (2012). Hubungan Antara Minat, Sikap Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar dalam Kursus Quantitative of Management. Politeknik Port Dickson.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |