Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan menguji keberkesanan kelas maya i-Think</p><p>(ITVC) ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dan minat terhadap topik</p><p>elektrokimia dalam kalangan murid berbeza keupayaan spatial. P...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9272 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9272 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
QD Chemistry |
| spellingShingle |
QD Chemistry Norfaiza Mohd Zuki Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan menguji keberkesanan kelas maya i-Think</p><p>(ITVC) ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dan minat terhadap topik</p><p>elektrokimia dalam kalangan murid berbeza keupayaan spatial. Pembangunan ITVC</p><p>dan kelas maya konvensional (CVC) adalah berdasarkan Model ADDIE.</p><p>Keberkesanan ITVC diuji menggunakan kajian kuasi eksperimen yang melibatkan 66</p><p>orang murid tingkatan empat. Kumpulan kawalan dan rawatan masing-masing terdiri</p><p>daripada 33 orang murid yang mempelajari tajuk elektrokimia secara CVC dan ITVC.</p><p>Kedua-dua ITVC dan CVC dibangunkan dalam platform kelas maya Google</p><p>Classroom yang disediakan oleh Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. ITVC</p><p>menggunakan i-Think manakala CVC menggunakan jadual perbandingan. Instrumen</p><p>kajian yang digunakan adalah ujian keupayaan spatial, ujian KBAT elektrokimia dan</p><p>soal selidik minat murid terhadap elektrokimia. Data dianalisis menggunakan</p><p>ANOVA faktorial (2x2) pengukuran berulang bagi menjawab persoalan kajian.</p><p>Terdapat kesan utama kumpulan dan keupayaan spatial terhadap KBAT murid bagi</p><p>topik elektrokimia. Kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan perbezaan min skor yang</p><p>signifikan di antara praujian dan pascaujian KBAT elektrokimia berbanding kumpulan</p><p>kawalan. Dapatan juga menunjukkan murid keupayaan spatial tinggi (KST)</p><p>merekodkan perbezaan min skor praujian dan pascaujian KBAT elektrokimia yang</p><p>signifikan berbanding murid keupayaan spatial rendah (KSR). Walau bagaimanapun,</p><p>dapatan menunjukkan tiada kesan utama kumpulan dan keupayaan spatial terhadap</p><p>minat murid bagi topik elektrokimia bagi kedua-dua kumpulan kawalan dan rawatan;</p><p>dan keupayaan spatial tinggi dan rendah. Secara keseluruhannya, dapat disimpulkan</p><p>bahawa penggunaan i-Think dalam kelas maya menunjukkan perbezaan KBAT yang</p><p>signifikan dalam kalangan murid berbeza keupayaan spatial tetapi tidak terhadap</p><p>minat bagi topik elektrokimia. Justeru, implikasinya ITVC berupaya membantu guru</p><p>membudayakan KBAT dan mengaplikasi pedagogi abad ke-21 dalam kelas maya</p><p>kimia.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Norfaiza Mohd Zuki |
| author_facet |
Norfaiza Mohd Zuki |
| author_sort |
Norfaiza Mohd Zuki |
| title |
Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| title_short |
Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| title_full |
Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| title_fullStr |
Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| title_sort |
pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya i-think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9272 |
| _version_ |
1776104610963914752 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:92722023-08-04 Pembangunan dan pengujian kelas maya I-Think elektrokimia ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan minat murid berbeza keupayaan spatial 2022 Norfaiza Mohd Zuki QD Chemistry <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan menguji keberkesanan kelas maya i-Think</p><p>(ITVC) ke atas kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dan minat terhadap topik</p><p>elektrokimia dalam kalangan murid berbeza keupayaan spatial. Pembangunan ITVC</p><p>dan kelas maya konvensional (CVC) adalah berdasarkan Model ADDIE.</p><p>Keberkesanan ITVC diuji menggunakan kajian kuasi eksperimen yang melibatkan 66</p><p>orang murid tingkatan empat. Kumpulan kawalan dan rawatan masing-masing terdiri</p><p>daripada 33 orang murid yang mempelajari tajuk elektrokimia secara CVC dan ITVC.</p><p>Kedua-dua ITVC dan CVC dibangunkan dalam platform kelas maya Google</p><p>Classroom yang disediakan oleh Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. ITVC</p><p>menggunakan i-Think manakala CVC menggunakan jadual perbandingan. Instrumen</p><p>kajian yang digunakan adalah ujian keupayaan spatial, ujian KBAT elektrokimia dan</p><p>soal selidik minat murid terhadap elektrokimia. Data dianalisis menggunakan</p><p>ANOVA faktorial (2x2) pengukuran berulang bagi menjawab persoalan kajian.</p><p>Terdapat kesan utama kumpulan dan keupayaan spatial terhadap KBAT murid bagi</p><p>topik elektrokimia. Kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan perbezaan min skor yang</p><p>signifikan di antara praujian dan pascaujian KBAT elektrokimia berbanding kumpulan</p><p>kawalan. Dapatan juga menunjukkan murid keupayaan spatial tinggi (KST)</p><p>merekodkan perbezaan min skor praujian dan pascaujian KBAT elektrokimia yang</p><p>signifikan berbanding murid keupayaan spatial rendah (KSR). Walau bagaimanapun,</p><p>dapatan menunjukkan tiada kesan utama kumpulan dan keupayaan spatial terhadap</p><p>minat murid bagi topik elektrokimia bagi kedua-dua kumpulan kawalan dan rawatan;</p><p>dan keupayaan spatial tinggi dan rendah. Secara keseluruhannya, dapat disimpulkan</p><p>bahawa penggunaan i-Think dalam kelas maya menunjukkan perbezaan KBAT yang</p><p>signifikan dalam kalangan murid berbeza keupayaan spatial tetapi tidak terhadap</p><p>minat bagi topik elektrokimia. Justeru, implikasinya ITVC berupaya membantu guru</p><p>membudayakan KBAT dan mengaplikasi pedagogi abad ke-21 dalam kelas maya</p><p>kimia.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9272 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9272 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdul Rasid Jamian, Shamsudin Othman & Norzila Md Yusof. (2011). Keberkesanan cerpen dalam mempertingkat prestasi penulisan karangan Bahasa Melayu dalam kalangan murid. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(2),45-57.</p><p>Abdul Rasid Jamian, Martini Misdon & Azhar Md Sabil. (2017). Penggunaan Peta Pemikiran I-Think dalam Pemahaman KOMSAS Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 51-59.</p><p>Abd Hakim Abdul Majid, Mokhairi Makhtar & Syadiah Nor Wan Shamsuddin. (2018). Keperluan pembelajaran berasaskan realiti maya dalam konstruk pemasangan komponen komputer mata pelajaran TMK SPM pendidikan di Malaysia :Satukajian rintis. Asian People Jornal, 1(1),28-44.</p><p>Ahmad Fkrudin Mohamed Yusoff, Wan Norina Wan Hamat & Nor Khayati Basir. (2019). Penggunaan aplikasi web 2.0 dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kursus mata pelajaran umum (MPU) di Politeknik. Journal of Science and Humanities, 5(16),1-13.</p><p>Aida Aryani Shahroom & Norhayati Hussin. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8 (9), 314-319.</p><p>Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6),68-72.</p><p>Al-Balushi, S. M. & Al-Hajri, S. H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 4758.</p><p>Al-Balushi,S. M.,Al-Musawi,A. S., Ambusaidi,A. K. &Al-Hajri,F. H. (2017). The effectivenests of interacting with scientific animations in chemistry using mobile devices on grade 12 students spatial ability and scientific reasoning skills. Journal of Science and Educational Technolgy, (26), 70-81.</p><p>Anderson, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education. Journal of Roeper Review, 36(2), 114-121.</p><p>Annisa Astrid, Rizqy Dwi Amrina, Deta Desvitasaru, Uci Fitriani & Aisyah Shahab. (2016). The power of questioning: Teachers questionaning strategies in the EFL Classroom. Indonesian Research Journal of Education 3(1), 91-106.</p><p>Aravind, C. V., Gamboa, R. A. & Lim, S. C. (2019). Empowered pedagogy: Catching upwiththefuture. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 1-22.</p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A. & Sorenson, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7th Edition).Belmont,Canada: WadsworthPublishingCompany.</p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th Edition). Belmont,Canada: WadsworthPublishingCompany.</p><p>Ates, C., Kaymaz, O., Kale, H. E. & Tekindal, M. A. (2019). Comparison of test statistics of nonnormal and unbalanced samples for multivariate analysis of variance in terms of type-1 error rates. Computational and Matematical Methods in Medicine, 2019(1), 1-8.https:doi.org/10.1155/2019/2173638.</p><p>Azwani Masuwai, Norain Mohd Tajudin & Noor Shah Saad. (2016). Evaluating the face and content validity of a teaching and learning guiding principles instrument (TLGPI): A perspective study of Malaysian teacher educators. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(3),11-21.</p><p>Bakken, J. P. (2017). Mnemonic strategies: Helping students with intellectual and development disabilities remember important information. Global Journal of Intellectual and Development Disabilities 2(3), DOI: 10.19080/GJIDD.2017.02.555587.</p><p>Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M.W. & Anderson, M.C. (2009). Memory. New York: PsychologyPress.</p><p>Basso, A., Chiorri, C., Bracco, F., Carnasciali, M. M., Alloisio, M. & Grotti, M. (2018). Improving the interest of high-school students toward chemistry by crime scene investigation. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(19), 558-556.</p><p>Bodner, G. M. & Guay, R. B. (1997). The purdue visualization of rotation test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4),1-17.</p><p>Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer London, New York.</p><p>Branoff, T.J. (2000). Spatialvisualization measurement: Amodification ofthe purdue spatial visualization test -visualisation of rotations. Engineering Design Graphic Journal, 4(2), 14-22.</p><p>Buzan T. (2002a). How to mind map: The ultimate thinking tool that will change your life. London: Thorson.</p><p>Buzan, T.(2002b). The power of verbal intelligent. London:Thorsons.</p><p>Bybee, R. W.,Taylor,J. A.,Gardner, A.,Van Scotter,P.,Powell,J.,Westbrook,A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness.ColoradoSprings, CO:Biological SciencesCurriculumStudies.</p><p>Caviglioli,O.,Harris,I. &Tindall,B. (2002). Thinking skills and eye Q: Visual tools for raising intelligence. Stafford,United Kingdom:Network EducationalPress Ltd.</p><p>Che Soh Said. (2012). Pembangunan dan Penilaian Keberkesanan Koswer Multimedia Interaktif Dengan Koswer Realiti Maya dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Sel. Disertasi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p>Che Soh Said, Irfan Naufal Umar, Balakrishnan Muniandy, Shakinaz Desa & Hafizul Fahri Hanafi. (2015). Aplikasi perisian visualisasi tiga dimensi dalam pembelajaran sains biologi: Implikasi terhadap pelajar berbeza keupayaan spatial. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 5(1), 57-69.</p><p>Chin,L. L. &EffandiZakaria. (2015). Understanding ofnumber conceptsandnumber operationsthrough gamesinearlymathematicseducation. Creative Education, 6, 1306-1315.DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.612130.</p><p>Chua Y. P. (2012). Kaedah statistik penyelidikan : Asas statistik penyelidikan (Buku 2). UPMSerdang Selangor. Mc Graw Hill(Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Clark,J. (2017). Winchonlearning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(1), 58-67.</p><p>Collado, R. C. (2019). Reducing thegender gap in spatialskills inhigh school physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1286, 1-7.</p><p>Cohen, A. R., Lohani, S. & Manjila, S. (2013). Virtual reality simulation: basic concepts and use in endoscopic neurosurgery training. Childs Nervous System, 29(8), 1235-1244.</p><p>Costa, A. L. & Kallick, B (2010). Habits of mind across the curriculum practical & creatives strategies for teachers. California: BrandmanUniversity.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. California:SAGEPublications. Inc.</p><p>Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research 5,194-197.</p><p>Demaree, D., Stonebraker, S., Zhao, W. & Bao, L. (2015). Virtual reality in introductory physics laboratories, Virtual Reality, 93-97.</p><p>Dik,B. J. &Hansen, J. C. (2008). Followingpassionate interest towell-being. Journal of Carreer Assessment 6(1),86-100.</p><p>Dousay, T. A. (2016). Effects of redundancy and modality on the situational interest of adult learners in multimedia learning. Education Technology and Research Deviation 64, 1251-1271.</p><p>Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L. & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology courses. Teaching Sociology 40(4),312-331.</p><p>Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psycology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon Publisher.</p><p>Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J. Nathan, M. J. & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Sciences in the Public Interest 14(1),4-58.</p><p>Eh Phon, D. N. (2017). Kesan perisian realiti berperantara berasaskan pendekatan inkuiri dalam pembelajaran sains. Disertasi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Universiti TeknologiMalaysia. Tidakditerbitkan.</p><p>Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2),63-74.</p><p>Ergun, A. (2019). Identification of the interest of turkish middle-school students in STEM careers: Gender and grade level differences. Journal of Baltic Science Education 18(1), 90-104.</p><p>Ernawati. (2018). Pengaruh aplikasi google classroom terhadap kualitas pembelajaran dan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas XI di man 1 Kota Tanggerang Selatan. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.</p><p>Faizah Abd Manan, Mohamed Amin Embi & Zamri Mahamod. (2010). Kerangka pembangunan dan penilaian modul belajar cara belajar bahasa melayu pelajar asing institusi pengajian tinggi Malaysia. Asean Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education 2(2), 64-76.</p><p>Fadiran, O. A., Biljon, J. V. & Schoeman, M. A. (2018). How can visualisation principles be used to support knowledge transfer in teaching and learning?. Persidangan Information Communication Technology and Society (ICTAS), 64-68. Athens, Greece.</p><p>Fatin Azhana Abd Aziz & Lilia Halim. (2019). Impact of concept mapping on students critical thinking skills in science. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(1), 83-92.</p><p>Fang,N. (2013). Increasinghighschoolstudents interestinSTEMeducationthrough collaborative brainstorming with yo-yos. Journal of STEM Education, 14(4), 8-14.</p><p>Gargouri, C. & Naatus, M. K. (2017). An experiment in mind-mapping and argument-mapping: Tools for assesing outcomes in teh business curriculum. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of teaching, 11(2),39-78.</p><p>Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for analysis application (8th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Gay, L. R. & Airasian, P. W. (2000). Educational research competencies for analysis and application (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.</p><p>Gay, L. R, Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for analysis applications (10th edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall,Inc.</p><p>Ghorbani, M. & Delavar, S. (2012). The role of virtual education in creative learning student of university. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 11(7), 950958.</p><p>Hady, W. R. A. &Abdulsafi, A. S. T. (2018). How can Iprepare an ideal lesson-plan?. International Journal of English and Education,7(4),275-289.</p><p>Hapini Awang, Zahurin Mat Aji, Wan Rozaini Sheikh Osman, Aidayani Abdul Nasir, Mazzlida Mat Deli & Wan Yusof Wan Hamat (2019). Virtual learning environment (VLE) implementation strategy: An analysis of practicality for google classroom implementation in Malaysia schools. Journal of Educational Research and Indigeneous Studies, 2(1), 1-16.</p><p>Hasnira Embong. (2005). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan penggunaan perisian multimedi elektrokimia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia tingkatan 4. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana. Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tidakditerbitkan.</p><p>Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.</p><p>Hoffler, T. M. & Leutner, D. (2011). Computers in Human Behavior: The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations Evidence for an ability as compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209216.</p><p>Huang, H. M. & Liaw, S. S. (2018). An analysis of learners intention toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 91-115.</p><p>Huang, H. M., Rauch, U. & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments; Based on constructivist approaches. Computers & Education, 55(33), 1171-1182.</p><p>Hyerle, D. & Yeager, C. (2007). Thinking maps: A language for learning. Canada: ThinkingMapsIncorporated.</p><p>Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google Classroom; What works and how?. Journal og Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12-18.</p><p>Ikramettin, D. (2016). The effect of the 5E instructional model enriched with cooperative learning and animations on seventh-grade students academis achievement and scientific attitudes. Internationa Electronic Journal of elementray Education, 9(1), 21-38.</p><p>Islam, A. K. M. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the universitycontext. Computers and Education, 69, 387-399.</p><p>Ismail Said, Khalijah Ahmad, Rohani Seman, Ros Silawati Ahmad & Mohd Fauzi Fadzil. (2020). Aplikasi 4K 1N dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan abad 21: Satu kajian terhadap pengajaran guru tingkatan enam di daerah Kubang Pasu. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 19(1), 64-79.</p><p>Jabatan PendidikanNegeri Pahang. (2019). Laporan pengurusan data jilid 3.Kuantan: UnionStationerySdn.Bhd.</p><p>Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri Pahang. (2013). Laporan pengurusan frog VLE. Kuantan: UnionStationerySdn.Bhd.</p><p>Jackson, S. L. (2003). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking approach. USA:ThomsonWadsworth.</p><p>Jaya Dwi Putra. (2017). Learning cycle 5E dalam meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan self-regulated learning matematika. Jurnal Prisma, 4(1), 43-56.</p><p>Kalyuga, S. (2007). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive e-learning environments: a cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 387-399.</p><p>Kamaruzaman Moidunny. (2013). Keberkesanan program kelayakan profesional kepengetuaan kebangsaan (NPQH). Disertasi Doktor Falsafah. Bangi: UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Kanbul, S. & Uzunboylu, H. (2017). Importance of coding education and robotic applications for achieving 21century skills in North Cyprus. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(1), 130-140.</p><p>Kaviza, M. (2020). Kesediaan murid terhadap penggunaan aplikasi google classroom sebagai platform pembelajaran sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 5(4), 108-115.</p><p>Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2013). Laporan perbentangan bajet : Intipati belanjawan 2013. Dibentangkan oleh Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak di Dewan Rakyat pada Jumaat 28 September 2012. Dicapai pada Mei 2013daripada http://pmr.penerangan.gov.my/index.php/component/content/article/524kolumnis-akhbar/14169-bajet-2013-jana-ekonomi-negara-beri-kesejahteraankepada-rakyat.html.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2002). Laporan prestasi SPM-Kimia 2. Lembaga PeperiksaanMalaysia, KementerianPendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Pelan induk pembangunan pendidikan (2006-2010). Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012a). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 : Laporan Awal-Ringkasan Eksekutif. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012b). Program i-think membudayakan kemahiran berfikir. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012c). Spesifikasi kurikulum kimia tingkatan empat kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,KementerianPendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013a). Inisiatif kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di Sekolah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013b). Pentaksiran kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. LembagaPendidikanMalaysia, KementerianPendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi : Aplikasi di sekolah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pedagogi Bahasa Malaysia Abad 21, Kursus Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Bahasa Melayu. Bahagian PendidikanGuru.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard (KSSM). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b). Laporan Trends in International Matematics and Science Study 2015. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan,KementerianPendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016c). Panduan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Inkuiri. KementerianPendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2018). Analisis bertopik kertas soalan peperiksaan sebenar kimia SPM. Lembaga Peperiksaan, Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia. SpotPrintSdn.Bhd.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019a). Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Bahagian Perancangan danPenyelidikan,Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019b). Pendidikan Untuk Semua: Pencapaian Pendidikan Malaysia Tahun 2019. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.</p><p>Khairunnisa Darus, Ismail Zainol & Hafsah Taha. (2016). Multimedia laboratory module in the learning of electrochemistry: Need assessment study. Jurnal of Sciene and Mathematics Letter, 4,31-37.</p><p>Larsson,H.,Tegern,M.,Monnier,A.,Skoglund, J.,Helander, C.,Persson,E.,Malm, C.,Broman, L. &Aasa, U. (2015). Contentvalidityindexand intra-andinter rater reliabilityofanew musclestrength/endurance testbattery forswedish soldiers. Journal Pone Plos One, 1-13.</p><p>Lee, T. T. & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Students characteristics: Implications to the design of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent (IMMPA) in the learning of electrochemistry. Research Journal of Applied Science, 7(3), 177-184.</p><p>Lee, T. T. (2013). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan modul interaktif dengan agen pedagogi dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia. Disertasi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia. Tidakditerbitkan.</p><p>Lee, T. T. & Kamisah Osman. (2014). Development of interactive multimedia with pedagogical agent (IMMPA) in the learning of electrochemistry: Needs assessment. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(8),3725-3732.</p><p>Lee, E., Kok, W. W. & Chun, C. F. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modelling approcah. Computer & Education, 55(4), 1424-1442.</p><p>Li, Y., Yang, Y. Yao, Z. & Xu, G. (2020). Virtual 3D environment for exploring the spatial ability of students. Virtual Reality and Intelligent Hardware, 2(6), 556568.</p><p>Liao, K. H. (2017). The abilities of understaning spatial relations, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization affect 3D product design performance: using carton box design as an example. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 131-147.</p><p>Liaw, S. S. & Huang, H. M. (2013). Investigating self-regulation towards e-learning based onlearnersattitudes. Computer & Education, 60, 14-24.</p><p>Linnenbrick-Garcia, L. Patall, E. A. & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591-614.</p><p>Long, D. & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect studen t achievement. Journal for Teacher Research, 13(2),1-7.</p><p>Lott,K. &Read,S. (2015). Map itand thenwriteit. Science and Children. 46-52.</p><p>Loyens, M. & Gibels, D. (2008). Understanding the effect of constructivist learning environment: Introduction to multi-directional approach. Instructional Science, 36,351-357.</p><p>Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantitification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-386.</p><p>Mahizer Hamzah & Mohd Azli Yeop. (2016). Frog VLE (peresekitaran pembelajaran maya) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran: Penerimaan dan kaedah pelaksanaannya. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teacher & Teacher Education, 6(2),67-77.</p><p>Manichander, T.(2016). E-Education. Solapur,India:LaxmiBook Publication.</p><p>Marunic, G. & Glazar, V. (2014). Improvement and assessment of spatial ability in engineeringeducation. Engineering Review, 34(2),139-150.</p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive Theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 31-48. New York: Cambridge University Press. Edisikedua.</p><p>Mayer, R. E.(2009). Multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, New York:Cambridge University Press. EdisiKedua.</p><p>Mayer, R. E. (2010). Seeking a science of instruction. Instructional Science, 38, 143145.</p><p>Mayer, R. E. & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction 33, 12-18.</p><p>Mayer, R. E. & Fiorella, L. (2014). Princples for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and tempiral contiguity principles. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York:Cambridge UniversityPress. EdisiKedua.</p><p>Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.</p><p>Michael, O. M., Ina, V. S. M. & Pierre, F. (2007). TIMSS 2007 International Science Report. Boston: InternationalStudyCenter,Lynch Schoolof Education.</p><p>McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability : the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276 282.</p><p>Md Daud Ismail, Nur Syuhada Md Zain & Roshayati Abdul Hamid. (2016). Pembelajaran-e, tekanan dan komitmen belajar dalam kalangan pelajar sains sosial di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Personalis Pelajar, 19(1), 55-64.</p><p>Melvina, C. H. C. (2021). Tahap penerimaan google jamboard sebagai alat digital dalam e-pembelajaran: Satu kajian. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(9),34-45.</p><p>Merchant, Z., Goetz, E.T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W. &Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70,29-40.</p><p>Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L. & Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristic, features of desktop 3D virtual realityenvironments, and college chemistry education: A structural equation modellinganalysis. Computers & Education, 59(2),551-568.</p><p>Mohammad Azri Amatan, Crispina, G. K. H. & Vincent P. (2021). Kesahan kandungan soal selidik faktor konteks, input dan proses terhadap penerimaan pelaksanaan elemen pendidikan STEM dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru menggunakan nisbah kesahan kandungan (CVR). International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 23(1),10-22.</p><p>Mohd Azhar Abd Hamid. (2013). Pengenalan pemikiran kritis dan kreatif cetakan keempat. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. CetakRatuSdn.Bhd.</p><p>Mohd Fakharuddin Mahmod. (2018). Chemistry SPM From Zero to Hero: Ringkas dan Padat.Edisipertama. Kuantan:Percetakan JinJingSdn.Bhd.</p><p>Mohd Khairulnizam Ramlie, Hanafi Moh Tahir & Ahmad Sofiyuddin Mohd Shuib. (2018). Kepentingan imaginasi dan persepsi dalam mereka bentuk imej 3D. Ideology, 3(2), 110-120.</p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka,Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>MohdZikri Ihsan Mohd Zabhi,Shamsudin Othman,Abdul RasidJamian &Azhar Md Sabil. (2019). Penggunaan peta pemikiran dalam pembelajaran cerpen KOMSAStingkatanlima. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 9(1), 47-55.</p><p>Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 42(5),34-36.</p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction. Edisikelima. New YorkJohn.Wiley&Sons,Inc.</p><p>Muhammad Saiful Bahri Yusoff. (2019). ABC of content validation and context validityindexcalculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54.</p><p>Nadia Abdul Hamid & Jamalul Lail Abdul Wahab. (2017). Aplikasi persekitaran pembelajaran maya frog (Frog VLE) dalam kalangan guru di sekolah menengah luarbandar. Jurnal Wacana Sarjana, 1(1), 1-12.</p><p>Nasyimah Ismail & Zamri Mahamod. (2016). Sikap dan kesediaan pelajar sekolah menengah terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pembelajaran komsas bahasamelayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(2), 59-67.</p><p>Nicholas Hess, A. K. & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacycourse. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2),264-282.</p><p>Noraini Idris (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan edisi kedua. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Mc Graw-HillEducation (Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Norasiken Bakar. (2008). Makmal maya kimia berasaskan pendekatan kognitivisme, konstruktivisme dan konteksual (VLab Chem).DisertasiIjazah Doktor Falsafah. Bangi:UniversitiKebangsaanMalaysia. Tidakditerbitkan.</p><p>Norasiken Bakar & Halimah Badioze Zaman. (2010). Pengujian makmal maya kimia berasaskan pendekatan kognitivisme, konstruktivisme dan kontekstual (Vlab-Chem): Konsruk keberkesanan. Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia 8, 35-49.</p><p>Norhailmi Abdul Mutalib. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21 bukan sekadar susun kerusi dan meja. Perpustakaan NegaraMalaysia. Percetakan Perlis(1990) Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Norhailmi AbdulMutalib,Ahmad Azrul Arefe Ahmad Rosdi. (2018). STEM : Amalan terbaik bilik darjah. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Percetakan Perlis (1990) SdnBhd.</p><p>Norlia Harun & Faizah A. Ghani. (2016). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan soal selidik amalan belajar pelajar berpencapaian rendah sekolah berasrama penuh. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 25(3),40-52.</p><p>Norlidah Alias, Saedah Siraj, Mohd Nazri Abdul Rahman & Dorothy Dewitt. (2013). Design and developmenet research: Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur:Pearson Malaysia Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Nurfarihah Kamarudin, Lee, T. T., Aisyah Mohamad Sharif, Hafsah Taha & Nurulsaidah Abdul Rahim. (2020). Pembangunan dan persepsi terhadap modul e-pentaksiran untuk massive open online course (MOOC) kimia. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 8(2), 109-121.</p><p>Nursafra Mohd Zhaffar, Wan Ali Akhbar Wan Abdullah, Mohd Isa Hamzah & Khadijah Abdul Razak. (2018). Strategi penyoalan pendidikan islam dalam pengajaran berfikir kritis. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization, 2(1),72-87.</p><p>Nursyahirah Ahmad & Denis Lajiun. (2020). Persekitaran pembelajaran dan minat dalam kerjaya STEM. International Journal of Modern Education, 2(6), 2849.</p><p>Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Singh, C. K. S., Md Nasir Ibrahim, Norwaliza Abdul Wahab, Mohamad Termizi Borhan, Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakerawala Pendidikan, 40(1),170-182.</p><p>Ormrod, J.E. (2008). Human learning. Upper Saddler River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Paek, S., Hoffman, D. L. & Saravanos, A. (2017). Spatial contiguity and incidental learning multimedia environments. British Journal of Education Technology, 48(6), 1390-1401.</p><p>Pallant, J (2001). SPSS survival manual a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 10).BuckinghamOpenUniversityPress.</p><p>Pallant (2005). SPSS survival manual a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 12). Allen&Unwind,Australia.</p><p>Park, B., Flowerday, T. & Brunken, R. (2015). Cognitive and effective effects of seductive detailsinmultimedia. Computer in Human Behavior, 44,267-278.</p><p>Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kuantan. (2019a). Kutipan enrolment murid Kuantan Jilid 3.UnionstationerySdn.Bhd.</p><p>Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kuantan. (2019b). SMK Abdul Rahman Talib: Laporan impak peperiksaan pertengahan tahun tingkatan empat. Union stationery Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kuantan. (2019c). SMK Abdul Rahman Talib: Laporan impak peperiksaan pertengahan tahun tingkatan lima. Union stationery Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Perez, M. C. B. & Furman M. (2016). What is a scientific experiment? The impact of a professional development course on teachers ability to design an inquiry-based science curriculum. International Journal of Environmenta & Science Education, 11(6), 1387-1401.</p><p>Peters, D. (2014). Interface design for learning: Design strategies for learning experiences. Edisipertama. New riders, UnitedStatesofAmerica.</p><p>Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know whatsbeing reported? critique and recommendendations. Research in Nurisng and Health, 29, 489-497.</p><p>Rafiza Abdul Razak. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran aktif secara kolaboratif atas talian dalam analisis novel bahasa melayu. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(3),34-46.</p><p>Raja Abdullah Raja Ismail & Daud Ismail. (2018). Aplikasi konsep 4C pembelajaran abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru pelatih pengajian agama institut pendidikan gurukampusDato; RazaliIsmail. Asian People Jurnal, 1(1),45-65.</p><p>Raja Nazim Abdullah, Junaidah Abdul Muait & Ganefri. (2019). Students perception towards modern technology as teaching aids. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 37-42.</p><p>Renkl, A. & Scheither, K. (2017). Studying visual displays: How to instructionally supportlearning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 599-621.</p><p>Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. The Development of Achievement Motivation, 173-195. Academic Press,Inc. University ofToronto,Canada.</p><p>Richey, R. C., Klien, J. D. & Nelson, W. (2004). Development research: Studies of instructional design and development. Handbook of Research for educational communication and technology. Edisi kedua. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.</p><p>Rosnidar Mansor, Haeidatul Nashrah Hassan, Norazilawati Abdullah & Nik Azmah Nik Yussuf. (2015). Keberkesanan penggunaan I-think terhadap pencapaian dan minat murid dalam tajuk sifat bahan, sains tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2),98-116.</p><p>Ryoo, K., Bedell, K. & Swearingen, A. (2018). Promoting linguisyically diverse students short-term and long term understanding of chemical phenomena using visualizations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 508522.</p><p>Safadel, P. & White, D. (2020). Effectiveness of computer-generated virtual reality (VR) in learning and teaching environments with spatial frameworks. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(16), 1-17.</p><p>Said, M. S. & Rahim, A. (2012). Transformasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran inovatif melalui thinking maps. Paper Presented at International Malaysia-Indonesia (Malindo) Education Research Symposium. IPG Kampus Ilmu Khas, Kuala lumpur.</p><p>Saifolrudin Khalid Mahzan & Mohamad Khairi Othman. (2019).Pembangunan sistem prototaip e-pendidikan islam berasaskan teknologi web di institusi pondok di Kedah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(26), 1-26.</p><p>Salina Mokhtar & Rahimi Che Aman. (2013). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen kesejahteraan psikologi versi bahasa melayu. Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan. PulauPinang:UniversitiSainsMalaysia.</p><p>Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., Hill, C. (2013). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning onbehaviors, attitudes, and clinical prcatices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidenced-based clinical practice. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 11(2),1-12.</p><p>Santiago, H. C. (2011). Visual mapping to enhance learning and critical thinking. Optometric Education, 36(3),125-139.</p><p>Schroeder, N. L. & Cenkci, A. T. (2018). Spatial contiguity and spatial split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 679-701.</p><p>Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th edition). Boston, Massachusettes. Pearson.</p><p>Shampa, I. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how?. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12-18.</p><p>Shamsazila Saaban, Muhammad Faizal Abdul Ghani & Ghazali Darusalam. (2017). Pelaksanaan program I-think di sekolah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur: Satukajianawal. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(1),72-106.</p><p>Siti Fauziah Mohd Amin, Sabariah Sharif, Mad Nor Madjapuni & Muralindran Mariappan. (2020). implementasi Model ADDIE dalam pembangunan modul robot m-solat. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies, 2(1), 1-23.</p><p>Siti Hajar Halili. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-learning, 7(1), 63-69.</p><p>Siti Rahayah Ariffin. (2003). Teori, konsep & amalan dalam pengukuran dan penilaian. PusatPembangunan Akademik, UKM,Bangi.</p><p>Siti Zubaidah, Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S. & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated withmindmap. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77-91.</p><p>Small, R. V., Dodge, B. J. & Xiqiang, J. (1996). Dimensions of interest and boredom ininstructional situations. Educational Resources Information Center, 712-726. 18th National Convention of the Association for educational communications andtechnology, Indiapolis.</p><p>Som Nor dan Mohd Dahlan Mohd Ramli. (1998). Kemahiran Berfikir Secara Kritis & Kreatif. Selangor:Longman. Pearson educationMalaysia.</p><p>Stieff, M. & Uttal, D. H. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement?. Education of Psychology Review, 27,607-615.</p><p>Suparlan (2019). Teori konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2),79-88.</p><p>Suzlina Hilwani Baharuddin & Jamaludin Badushah. (2016). Tahap pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap guru sekolah menengah terhadap penggunaan web 2.0 dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2(6), 33-43.</p><p>Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.</p><p>Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning.Dalam R.E. Mayer (Ed). The Cambrige handbook of multimedia learning, 19-30.New York:Cambridge UniversityPress.</p><p>Syamsulaini Sidek & Mashitoh Hashim. (2016). Pengajaran berasaskan video dalam pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar: Analisis dan kajian kritikal. Jurnal of ICT in Education 3, 24-33.</p><p>Tan Y. T., Loh W. L. & Tan O. T. (2016). Success Chemistry SPM. Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Tangen, J. L. & Borders, L. D. (2017). Applying information processing theory to supervision: An inintial exploration. Counselor Education & Supervision 56, 98-111.</p><p>Turk, F. & Calik, M. (2008). Using difference conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: A simple teaching endothermic-exothermic reactions. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1),1-10.</p><p>Uttal, D. H, Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R. & Warren, C. (2013). The malleability of spatial skilss: A meta analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 2(139), 352-402.</p><p>Vicky Dwi Wicaksomo & Putri Rachmadyanti. (2018). Pembelajaran blended learning melalui google classroom di sekolah dasar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan PGSC UMS & HDPGSDI Wilayah Jawa 13 Mei 2017, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakata,Indonesia.</p><p>Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O.L & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research. Edisiketiga. New York:Springer PublishingCo.</p><p>Wenger, K. (2015). Overview of learning theory, instructional design, development, implementation, and assessment of an introduction to web development course incorporating 21st century technology. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 5(3),13-18.</p><p>Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B. & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimatingcontentvalidity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25,508-518.</p><p>Yuhaida Yusof & Mohammad Ibrahim. (2014). Effectiveness of a Visual-Spatial Intelligence Teaching Courseware on the Achievement of Underachieving Students in Equivalent Fractions. EDUCATUM Jurnal of Science, Mathematics and Technology,1(1), 53-63.</p><p>Yusniza Yusof, Lee, M. F & Lai, C. S. (2016). Integrasi konsep teori beban kognitif dalam pendidikan kejuruteraan di Malaysia: Satu kajian literatur. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(3), 46-57.</p><p>Zaidatun Tasir & Mohd Salleh Abu. (2003). Analisis data berkomputer SPSS 11.5 for windows. KualaLumpur:Venton Publishing(M)Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Zamri Mahamod, Anthony Aloysius Akup & Hadi Hassan. (2019). The effectiveness of using i-think thniking map in enhancing the mastery of malay language writing skills of form 6 in Mukah district. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4),386-401.</p><p>Zamri Mahamod & Nur Aisyah Mohamad Noor. (2011). Persepsi guru tentang penggunaan aplikasi multimedia dalam pengajaran komponen sastera Bahasa Melayu. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 11(3),163-177.</p><p>Zheng, R., Smith, D., Luptak, M., Hill, R. D., Hill, J. & Rupper, R. (2016). Does visual redundancy inhibit older persons information processing in learning?. Educarional Gerontology, 42(9),635-645.</p><p>Zulkifli Mahmood. (2011). The Ultimate Study Guide, Mneumonic Method & Revision Notes Chemistry SPM.Edisi ketiga. Kuantan: Percetakan JinJingSdn. Bhd.</p><p>Zurainu Mat Jasin & Abdul Sukor Shaari. (2012). Keberkesanan model konstruktivisme lima fasa needham dalam pengajaran komsas bahasa melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2(1),79-92.</p><p></p> |