The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing

The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing

<p>Today numerous innovations have been experienced in the field of technology. These</p><p>innovations progressively incorporated into education environment. Virtual reality is</p><p>among the innovation that has been the buzzwor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2022
Subjects:
P Language and Literature
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9682
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9682
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic P Language and Literature
spellingShingle P Language and Literature
Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran
The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
description <p>Today numerous innovations have been experienced in the field of technology. These</p><p>innovations progressively incorporated into education environment. Virtual reality is</p><p>among the innovation that has been the buzzword among educators and learners over</p><p>the past few years. The purpose of this research was to explore the use of Google</p><p>Expeditions virtual reality application to enhance English learners descriptive writing</p><p>abilities among primary students. A quantitative research method was used in this</p><p>study. Quasi experimental research design was preferred in this study. A total of 60</p><p>participants of Year 4 pupils were selected according to the study purpose. 30 pupils</p><p>used Google Expeditions (VR) application while 30 pupils used static pictures and</p><p>textbook. Data was collected using results of pre and post tests and analysed using</p><p>SPSS. Independent and paired sample t-tests were used to compare students</p><p>achievement scores among both groups. The independent t-test statistics report that</p><p>there is a significant difference in the post test scores between the experimental and</p><p>control group where the report presents the followings: (t=4.526, df=58, p<.05). Also,</p><p>questionnaire was administered to 30 pupils in the experimental group to obtain their</p><p>perceptions and feedbacks towards the use of Google Expeditions (VR) application.</p><p>According to the study results from the questionnaire, it was concluded that Google</p><p>Expeditions virtual reality application was liked and beneficial to the participants. The</p><p>findings from this study can be used as basis for future studies in the field of virtual</p><p>reality learning by teachers of all language proficiency.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran
author_facet Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran
author_sort Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran
title The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
title_short The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
title_full The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
title_fullStr The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
title_full_unstemmed The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing
title_sort effect of google expeditions application (vr) on primary students descriptive writing
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9682
_version_ 1783730291419906048
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:96822023-11-15 The effect of Google Expeditions application (VR) on primary students descriptive writing 2022 Vidhiyavaani Kannapiran P Language and Literature <p>Today numerous innovations have been experienced in the field of technology. These</p><p>innovations progressively incorporated into education environment. Virtual reality is</p><p>among the innovation that has been the buzzword among educators and learners over</p><p>the past few years. The purpose of this research was to explore the use of Google</p><p>Expeditions virtual reality application to enhance English learners descriptive writing</p><p>abilities among primary students. A quantitative research method was used in this</p><p>study. Quasi experimental research design was preferred in this study. A total of 60</p><p>participants of Year 4 pupils were selected according to the study purpose. 30 pupils</p><p>used Google Expeditions (VR) application while 30 pupils used static pictures and</p><p>textbook. Data was collected using results of pre and post tests and analysed using</p><p>SPSS. Independent and paired sample t-tests were used to compare students</p><p>achievement scores among both groups. The independent t-test statistics report that</p><p>there is a significant difference in the post test scores between the experimental and</p><p>control group where the report presents the followings: (t=4.526, df=58, p<.05). Also,</p><p>questionnaire was administered to 30 pupils in the experimental group to obtain their</p><p>perceptions and feedbacks towards the use of Google Expeditions (VR) application.</p><p>According to the study results from the questionnaire, it was concluded that Google</p><p>Expeditions virtual reality application was liked and beneficial to the participants. The</p><p>findings from this study can be used as basis for future studies in the field of virtual</p><p>reality learning by teachers of all language proficiency.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9682 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9682 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>Ahmed Muhammed Abdulla, A. (2014). The Role of Language Learning Strategies (LLS) and the Effect of Different Individuals in Learning Target or Second Language. International Journal Of Language And Linguistics, 2(3), 197. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.19</p><p>Akintoye, A. (2015). Developing Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks. Jedm.oauife.edu.ng</p><p>Akman, E., & Cakir, R. (2019). Pupils Opinions on an Educational Virtual Reality Game in Terms of Flow Experience. International Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Learning (Ijet), 14(15), 121. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i15.10576</p><p>Akhtar, I. (2016). Research design. Research Gate Journal, 17(2).</p><p>Aldoobie, N. (2015). Technology Integration and Learning Theory. American International Journal of Contemporary Research,</p><p>Aliaga, M. and Gunderson, B. (2002) Interactive Statistics. [Thousand Oaks]: Sage Publications.</p><p>Alizadeh, M. (2019). Virtual Reality in the Language Classroom : Theory and Practice.</p><p>Allcoat, D., & Muhlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology.</p><p>Alreck, P.L. & Settle, R.B. (1995). The survey research handbook. Second edition, Boston: Irwin</p><p>Arifin, S., & Anwar, C. (2018). The impact of collaborative writing strategy at students writing skill in descriptive text. Prominent, 1(1). doi: 10.24176/pro. v1i1.2487</p><p>Aylett, R., & Louchart, S. (2003). Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 7(1), 2-9. doi: 10.1007/s10055-003-0114</p><p>Barry, J. (2016). The Routledge handbook of planning research methods. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp.480-481.</p><p>Blaike, N. (2003). Analyzing Quantitative Data: From Description to Explanation. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.</p><p>Boulton, C. A., Kent, C., & Williams, H. T. (2018). Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a bricks-and-mortaruniversity. Computers & Education, 126, 129142.</p><p>Brogan, D., & Kutner, M. (1980). Comparative Analyses of Pretest-Posttest Research Designs. The American Statistician, 34(4), 229. doi: 10.2307/2684066</p><p>Brownridge, P. (2020). From chalkboards to virtual reality: Exploring the development and implementation of virtual reality in United States History classrooms. Rowan Digital Works. Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3762&context=etd</p><p>Britt, J., & LaFontaine, G. (2009). Google Earth: A virtual globe for elementary geography. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 21(4), 2023.</p><p>Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual Reality Technology. WILEY Computer Science Technology.</p><p>Bowling, A. (2009). Research methods in health: Investigative Health and Health Services (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 162176.</p><p>Camp, W. G. (2001). Formulating and Evaluating Theoretical Frameworks for Career and Technical Education Research. Journal of Vocational Education Research. 26(1). DOI: 10.5328/JVER26.1.4</p><p>Campbell, D., Stanley, J., & Gage, N. (1981). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.</p><p>Catapano, J. (2017). Technology in the classroom: Googles virtual field trips. Teach Hub.com. Retrieved from http://www.teachhub.com/technology-classroomgoogles- Virtual fieldtrips</p><p>Chen, C. J. (2006). The design, development and evaluation of a virtual reality-based learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 39-63.</p><p>Chen, Y., Carger, L. C., & Smith, T. J. (2017). Mobile-assisted narrative writing practice for young English language learners from a funds of knowledge approach. Language, Learning and Technology, 21(1), 2841.</p><p>Chen, Y., Smith, T. J., York, C. S., & Mayall, H. J. (2019). Google Earth Virtual Reality and expository writing for young English Learners from a Funds of Knowledge perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 124. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151</p><p>Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Instruments for assessing the impact of technology in education. Computers in the Schools, 18(2-3), 5-25. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1300/J025v18n02_02</p><p>Cochrane, T. (2016). Mobile VR in education: From the fringe to the mainstream. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(4), 4460. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2016100104</p><p>Cox, J. (2019). How to motivate students in simple ways. TeachHub. Retrieved from https://www.teachhub.com/how-motivate-students-simple-ways</p><p>Costa, N. and Melotti, M. (2012) Digital media in archaeological areas, virtual reality, authenticity and hyper-tourist gaze, Sociology Mind, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.5360.</p><p>Cloud, N., Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (2009). Literacy instruction for English language learners: A teachers guide to research-based practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.</p><p>Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/introduction-for-6-12/</p><p>Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall</p><p>Datchuk, S., & Kubina, R. (2017). A Writing Intervention to Teach Simple Sentences and Descriptive Paragraphs to Adolescents with Writing Difficulties. Education And Treatment Of Children, 40(3), 303-326. doi: 10.1353/etc.2017.0013</p><p>Davis, F. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing using new end-user information systems: theory and results. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA</p><p>Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340</p><p>Dayana Farzeeha & Mohd Safarin Nordin (2012). Visualisation skills among Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Student. International journal of information and communication technology education official publication of the Information Resources Management Association. 2(4), 371-374. doi: 10.7763/IJIET. 2012.V2.155</p><p>Derewianka, Beverly. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Newton: PETA</p><p>Delialioglu, O. (2012). Students Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture Based and Problem Based Instructional Approaches. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 310-322. doi: 17017610</p><p>Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.</p><p>Dong, W., Wang, G. (2021). A Study on Virtual Reality Technology for College Oral English Online Self-help Learning System. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1726-3_54</p><p>Dragani, R. (2019). Brain Science: Why VR is so effective for learning. Verizon. Available at: https://www.verizon.com/about/our company/fourth industrial revolution/brain-science-why-vr-so-effective-learning</p><p>Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), pp.4-22.</p><p>Emilia, Emi. (2010). Teaching Writing, Developing Critical Learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press</p><p>Ethan, S. (2017). An Investigation into Cooperative Learning in a Virtual World using Problem- Based Learning. Online Learning, 21(2). doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i2.796</p><p>Etikan, I., Musa, A. S., & Alkassim, S., R. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.</p><p>Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of Language Proficiency from the Learner's Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), p.43.</p><p>Ferriter, B. (2016) Tool Review: #GoogleExped.s. Virtual Reality App, The Tempered Radical, 9 March, Retrieved from http.//blog.williamferriter.com/2016/03/09/tool-review-googleexped. s-virtual-reality-app/</p><p>Ferriter, B. (2016) Tool Review: #GoogleExped.s. Virtual Reality App, The Tempered Radical, 9 March, Retrieved from http.//blog.williamferriter.com/2016/03/09/tool-review-googleexped. s-virtual-reality-app/</p><p>Ferriter, B. (2016). Tool Review: Google Expeditions Virtual Reality Application the Tempered Radical.</p><p>Fitriyeni, R., S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Picture towards Students Writing Skill of Descriptive Text. Jurnal Arkab Juara. 5(3), pp.73-90</p><p>Gardner, C. & Amoroso, D., L. (2004). Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the Big Island, HI. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265623.</p><p>Gerot, L, and Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of Functional Grammar. New York: Mc Grow Hill.</p><p>Gershon, L. (2017, December 28). How blackboards transformed American education. JSTOR Daily. Retrieved from https://daily.jstor.org/how-blackboardstransformed- american-education/</p><p>Goldie, J. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age?. Medical Teacher, 38(10), pp.1064-1069.</p><p>Grant, C. & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for House. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research, Pp. 12-22 doi: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9</p><p>Harmer, J. (2006). How to Teach Writing. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2).</p><p>Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Exploratorium</p><p>Hu Au, E. and Lee, J. (2017). Virtual reality in education: a tool for learning in the experience age. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 4(4), p.215.</p><p>Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Jordon, C. (2018). Technology in the Classroom: Googles Field Trips. Retrieved from https://www.teachhub.com/technology-classroom-googles-virtual-field-trips</p><p>Junyong, I. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 70(6), 601- 605. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601</p><p>Kalu, F. (2017). What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements. International Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(2), 43. doi: 10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711</p><p>Kamalludeen, R., Hassan, A., & Ahmad Nasaruddin, N. S. (2016). Student usage patterns of VLE-Frog.</p><p>Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology- Based Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-23.</p><p>Kellogg, R.T. (2008). Training Writing Skills: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26.</p><p>Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in human behavior, 7(1), 75-94. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/29534/0000622.pdf</p><p>Kuo, Y., Belland, B., Schroder, K. and Walker, A. (2014). K-12 teachers perceptions of and their satisfaction with interaction type in blended learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3), pp.360-381.</p><p>Larsson, T. (2017). A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native-speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific Purposes, 48, pp.57-70.</p><p>Lee, J. (2019). A study on Teaching Methods of Korean Language Speaking Education Using Google Expeditions. Oriental Studies, 18(10), 89-101. doi: 10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-10-89-101</p><p>Liehr P. & Smith M. J. (1999). Middle Range Theory: Spinning Research and Practice to Create Knowledge for the New Millennium. Advances in Nursing Science, 21(4): 81- 91.</p><p>Li, K., Chen, C., Cheng, S., & Tsai, C. (2016). The Design of Immersive English Learning Environment Using Augmented Reality. Universal Journal Of Educational Research, 4(9), 2076-2083. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040919</p><p>Llyod, A., Rogerson, S. & Stead, G. (2017). Imagining the potential for using virtual reality technologies in language learning: research theory and practice. Doi: 10.4324/9781315523293-19</p><p>Lynch, M. (2018, May 30th). Using Google Expeditions in the classroom. Tech Advocate. Retrieved from https://www.thetechedvocate.org/using-googleexpeditions-in-the-classroom/</p><p>Lynch, M. (2018). How teachers can and should use technology in the classroom. Education Week. Retrieved from https://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teaching_ahead/2018/10/how_teachers_can_and_shoud_use_technology_in_the_classroom.html</p><p>Majid, U. (2018). Research Fundamentals: Study Design, Population, and Sample Size. Undergraduate Research In Natural And Clinical Science And Technology (URNCST) Journal, 2(1), 1-7. doi: 10.26685/urncst.16</p><p>McGregor, C. (2019). Petar Jandric, Learning in the Age of Digital Reason. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(2), pp.174-176.</p><p>McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual realities. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 457-487). New York: Macmillan Library Reference, USA.</p><p>McLellan, H. (2003). Virtual realities. In D. H. Jonassen & P. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.), pp. 461-498. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum</p><p>Minocha, S. (2015). The State of Virtual Reality in Education Shape of Things to Come. International Journal Of Engineering Research, 4(11), 596-598. doi: 10.17950/ijer/v4s11/1104</p><p>Nafisah, Nia, and Kurniawan, Eri. (2007). Writing for General Commucication. Bandung: UPI Press</p><p>Namasivayam, P., Singh, C., Mostafa, N., Janoory, L., & Abdullah, M. (2017). Improving ESL Students Descriptive Writing through Wh-Question Technique. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 7(7). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i7/3091</p><p>Odlum, A. (2019). Undertaking the impossible with Google Expeditions: Virtual reality and augmented reality experiences in the history classroom. Teaching History, 53 (4). ISSN 0040-0602</p><p>Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and Reliability Issues in Educational Research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391. Retrieved from http://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/11851</p><p>Olson, C. B., Scarcella, R., & Matuchniak, T. (2015). English learners, writing, and the common core. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 570592.</p><p>Ozkan, B. (2017). The Reflections of English as a Foreign Language Teachers on the Use of Virtual Reality in Classroom Practice (International Black Sea University Case). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 2(2).</p><p>Park, Y. (2019). A Research on Dance Education based on Constructivism -Focused on Vygotskys Social Constructivism Theory-. Dance Research Journal of Dance, 77(6), pp.31-49.</p><p>Parmaxi, A., Stylianou, K. and Zaphiris, P. (2017). Leveraging Virtual Trips in Google Expeditions to Elevate Students Social Exploration. IFIP Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_32</p><p>Parsons, D., Inkila, M. and Lynch, J. (2019). Navigating learning worlds: Using digital tools to learn in physical and virtual spaces. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4).</p><p>Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google Earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106, 145152.</p><p>Piovesan, S. D., Passerino, L. M. and Pereira, A. S. (2012). Virtual Reality as a tool in the Education. International Association for the Development of the Information Society. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542830</p><p>Pham, T., & Jimenez, C. (2012). An accurate paired sample test for countdata. Bioinformatics, 28(18), i596-i602. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts394</p><p>Rafika, M. (2014). Teaching Descriptive Text Writing Through Guided Wh-Questions: A Pre- experiment Student at the Eight Grade Students of SMP Negeri 7 Pontianak in Academic Year 2013/2014. WKS: Studies on English Language and Education 1(1), 51- 58.</p><p>Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2018). The technological pedagogical content knowledge of EFL teachers. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. 13(2), 170-182.</p><p>Rao, P. (2019). The significance of writing skills in ell environment. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(3), 5. doi: 10.5958/2249-7137.2019.00035.1</p><p>Riswanto, & Prandika, P. P. (2012). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in the Teaching of Writing at SMAN 3 Bengkulu, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 60-68.</p><p>Sahin, A. (2015). The Effects of Quantity and Quality of Teachers Probing and Guiding Questions on Student Performance. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(1), 95-113.</p><p>Sahrir, M., Yahaya, M. and Nasir, M. (2013). EZ-Arabic for Children: A Virtual Learning Resource Tool for Malaysian Primary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, pp.396-404.</p><p>Salsich, J.(2018). Moving from passive to active learning: Four ways to overcome student resistence. Education Week.</p><p>Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesnt and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. 13(2), 62-73.</p><p>Siegle, D. (2019). Seeing is believing: Using virtual and augmented reality to enhance student learning. Gifted Child Today. 42(1). 46-52</p><p>Siti Norzaimalina. (2018). Students perceptions in using virtual reality device in English classroom. Researchgate Publications.</p><p>Skeele, R., & Stefankiewicz, G. (2002). Blackbox in the sandbox: The decision to use technology with young children with annotated bibliography of Internet resources for teachers of young children. Educational Technology Review, 10(2), 79-95.</p><p>Smith, M.J., Ginger, E.J., Wright, K., Wright, M.A., Taylor, J.L., Humm, L.B. and Fleming, M.F. (2014) Virtual reality job interview training in adults with autism spectrum disorder, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 44, No. 10, p.24502463.</p><p>Sranamkam, T. (2014). The Effects of Web-Based Instruction in Physics Entitle MomentumUsing Collaborative Learning by Google Application to Enhance Problem Solving Skills for Grade XI Students. SSRN Electronic Journal.</p><p>Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching, 16(2), pp.233-244.</p><p>Sujon, Z (2019). Distruptive Play or Platform Colonism? The Contradictory Dynamics of Google Expeditions Educational Virtual reality. Digital Culture and Education, 11 (1). ISSN 1836-8301</p><p>Susilo, T., K., & Damayanti, I. (2018). The Effect Of Using Powerpoint Modified Pictures In Writing Descriptive Text To The Eighth Grade Students Of Smpn 22 Kota Bengkulu In 2016/2017 Academic Year. Journal Of English Education and Teaching, 2(1), 76-85. doi: 10.33369/jeet.2.1.76-85</p><p>Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035</p><p>Tech.ed.gov. (2017). Reimagining The Role of Technology in EducationRetrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf [Accessed 12 Feb. 2020.</p><p>Technology, Media and Telecomunications Predictions 2020. (2020). [ebook] pp.41-63. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/at/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/at-tmt-predictions-2020.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb. 2020.</p><p>Virtual Reality Society. (2017). Retrieved 02 April 2020, from https://www.vrs.org.uk/virtual-reality/history.html</p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p>Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., and Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional Effectiveness of Video Media.</p><p>Winn, W. (1993). A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Seattle, Washington: Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-9/</p><p>Yaacob, A., & Suriyanti, S. (2016). Exploring Teacher Strategies in Teaching Descriptive Writing in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instructions, 13(2), 71-95.</p><p>Yildirim, G., Elban, M., & Yildirim, S. (2018). Analysis of Use of Virtual Reality Technologies in History Education: A Case Study. Asian Journal Of Education And Training, 4(2), 62-69. doi: 10.20448/journal.522.2018.42.62.69</p><p>Yoandita, P. (2019). An analysis of students ability and difficulties in writing descriptive text. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal Of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, And Teaching), 7(1). doi: 10.35194/jj.v7i1.534</p><p>Youngblut, C. (1997). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Executive report. Reprintedfrom Educational uses of virtual reality technology. VR in the Schools, 3(1). Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://vr.coe.ecu.edu/vrits/3-1Young.htm</p><p>Yunus, M., & Chien, C. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 07(04), 619-626. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.74064</p><p>Zahabi, M., & Abdul Razak, A. (2020). Adaptive virtual reality-based training: a systematic literature review and framework. Virtual Reality. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w</p><p>Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in computers & education. Computers & Education, 122, 136152.</p><p>Zimmerman, T., Lanier, J., Blanchard, C., Bryson, S., & Harvill, Y. (1986). A hand gesture interface device. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17(SI), 189-192. doi: 10.1145/30851.275628</p><p>8 Major Milestones in the Brief History of Virtual Reality. (2020). Retrieved 03 April 2020, from https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/history-of-virtual-reality/</p><p></p>

Similar Items