Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualiti item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan</p><p>Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017. Kajian juga meneliti sumbangan item terhadapujian, kebolehpercayaan anggaran skor kebolehan calon, skor kebolehan calon</p&...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9751 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9751 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
| spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Amir Abdul Jaya Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualiti item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan</p><p>Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017. Kajian juga meneliti sumbangan item terhadapujian, kebolehpercayaan anggaran skor kebolehan calon, skor kebolehan calon</p><p>berbanding kesukaran item, perbezaan pencapaian calon mengikut aliran, dan item</p><p>berat sebelah. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berbentuk ex-post facto.</p><p>Seramai 1415 calon peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017 telah dipilih</p><p>secara pensampelan rawak berstrata sebagai subjek kajian. Instrumen kajian ialah item</p><p>aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017. Dapatan</p><p>kajian mendapati kualiti semua item tinggi kerana mempunyai kesahan konstruk</p><p>dengan fit statistics (0.5 < MNSQ < 1.5). Kebolehpercayaan ujian tinggi, iaitu 1.00</p><p>(>0.94). Analisis Parameter kesukaran item mendapati 2 item sukar (1.00 b 3.00),</p><p>2 item mudah (-3.00 b -1.00), dan 11 item sederhana (-1.00 b 1.00). Analisis</p><p>kesepadanan model mendapati semua item fit untuk tujuan pengujian (0.5 < MNSQ <</p><p>1.5). Terdapat 9 item mengandungi distraktor kurang berfungsi (p-value < 5%) dan 6</p><p>item mengandungi distraktor berfungsi dengan baik (p-value > 5%). Analisis</p><p>kebolehpercayaan anggaran skor kebolehan calon mendapati PRI = 0.50 dan PSI = 1.00</p><p>di bawah nilai minimum. Ukuran julat kebolehan calon lebih besar berbanding julat</p><p>kesukaran item. Kajian juga mendapati pencapaian calon Aliran Sains lebih tinggi</p><p>berbanding calon Aliran Kemanusiaan, iaitu perbezaan pencapaian sebanyak 0.20</p><p>logits. Kesan DIF wujud dalam Aliran Sains bagi item 1, iaitu calon lelaki (-0.54 logits)</p><p>lebih mudah menjawab berbanding calon perempuan (-1.09 logits). Kesimpulannya,</p><p>item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017 sesuai</p><p>untuk pengujian. Implikasi kajian mendapati penelitian item menggunakan Model</p><p>Pengukuran Rasch dapat menentukan kualiti item dengan baik.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Amir Abdul Jaya |
| author_facet |
Amir Abdul Jaya |
| author_sort |
Amir Abdul Jaya |
| title |
Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| title_short |
Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| title_full |
Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| title_fullStr |
Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch |
| title_sort |
analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan model pengukuran rasch |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9751 |
| _version_ |
1794025739343888384 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:97512023-12-11 Analisis item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan mata pelajaran pengajian am menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch 2022 Amir Abdul Jaya LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualiti item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan</p><p>Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017. Kajian juga meneliti sumbangan item terhadapujian, kebolehpercayaan anggaran skor kebolehan calon, skor kebolehan calon</p><p>berbanding kesukaran item, perbezaan pencapaian calon mengikut aliran, dan item</p><p>berat sebelah. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berbentuk ex-post facto.</p><p>Seramai 1415 calon peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017 telah dipilih</p><p>secara pensampelan rawak berstrata sebagai subjek kajian. Instrumen kajian ialah item</p><p>aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017. Dapatan</p><p>kajian mendapati kualiti semua item tinggi kerana mempunyai kesahan konstruk</p><p>dengan fit statistics (0.5 < MNSQ < 1.5). Kebolehpercayaan ujian tinggi, iaitu 1.00</p><p>(>0.94). Analisis Parameter kesukaran item mendapati 2 item sukar (1.00 b 3.00),</p><p>2 item mudah (-3.00 b -1.00), dan 11 item sederhana (-1.00 b 1.00). Analisis</p><p>kesepadanan model mendapati semua item fit untuk tujuan pengujian (0.5 < MNSQ <</p><p>1.5). Terdapat 9 item mengandungi distraktor kurang berfungsi (p-value < 5%) dan 6</p><p>item mengandungi distraktor berfungsi dengan baik (p-value > 5%). Analisis</p><p>kebolehpercayaan anggaran skor kebolehan calon mendapati PRI = 0.50 dan PSI = 1.00</p><p>di bawah nilai minimum. Ukuran julat kebolehan calon lebih besar berbanding julat</p><p>kesukaran item. Kajian juga mendapati pencapaian calon Aliran Sains lebih tinggi</p><p>berbanding calon Aliran Kemanusiaan, iaitu perbezaan pencapaian sebanyak 0.20</p><p>logits. Kesan DIF wujud dalam Aliran Sains bagi item 1, iaitu calon lelaki (-0.54 logits)</p><p>lebih mudah menjawab berbanding calon perempuan (-1.09 logits). Kesimpulannya,</p><p>item aneka pilihan soalan peperiksaan Pengajian Am Semester 3 STPM 2017 sesuai</p><p>untuk pengujian. Implikasi kajian mendapati penelitian item menggunakan Model</p><p>Pengukuran Rasch dapat menentukan kualiti item dengan baik.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9751 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9751 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia <p>Abdullah, A. Z. (1985). Analisis Soalan. Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>Ahmad, A., & Awang, M. I. (2008). Pengukuran dan Penilaian. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Dawama Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Ahmad Zawawi A. (1985). Analisa Soalan Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur</p><p>Akta MPM, M. P. (2014). Undang-Undang Malaysia Cetakan Semula. Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-Undang Malaysia.</p><p>Amin, L. (2011). Psychometric Methods to Develop and to Analyze Clinical Measures: A Comparison and Contrast of Rasch Analysis and Classical Test Theory Analysis of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale (Parent-report) in a Childhood Canser Sample. Open Access dissertations and thesis. Paper 6053.</p><p>Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th Edition). New York: Macmillan.</p><p>Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological Testing. New York: Macmillan.</p><p>Andrich, D. (1978). A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories. Psychometrika, 43, 357-374.</p><p>Andrich, D., & Mercer, A. (1997). International Perspectives on Selection Methods of Entry Into Higher Education. Canberra: National Board of Employment, Education and Training and Higher Education Council.</p><p>Ariffin, S. R. (2008). Inovasi dalam Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan: Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Arsaythamby, V., & Rosna, A. H. (2016). Teori Ujian dan Pentaksiran Pendidikan. Sintok: UUM Press.</p><p>Baker, F. B. (2001). The Basic of Item Response Theory (2nd Ed.). Wisconsin: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.</p><p>Bejar, I. I. (1983). Applications of Item Response Theory. Educational Research Institute: Research Institute of British Columbia.</p><p>Bond, R. D., & Fox, C. M. (2012). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in The Human Sciences (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.</p><p>Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying The Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in The Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ USA: Lawrence Associates.</p><p>Bond T. G. & Fox C.M. 2015. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Ed. ke-3. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.</p><p>Brown, F. G. (1989). Improving ESL Placement Tests Using Two Perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (1), 65-83.</p><p>Chong, H. Y. (2013). A Simple Guide to The Item Response Theory (IRT) and Rasch Modeling.</p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2007). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 1: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Clark & Cooper (2000), An Overview of the Representation and Discovery of Causal Relationships Using Bayesian Networks. In Glymour and Cooper, 1999, Pages 3-62.</p><p>Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological Testing and Assessment. New York: McGraw Hill.</p><p>Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.</p><p>Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical & Modern Test Theory. Ohio, USA: Cengage Learning.</p><p>Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. USA: Cengage Learning.</p><p>Culligan, B. (2011). Item Respons Theory, Reliability and Standard Error. Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin Women's Junior College.</p><p>De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: The Guilford Press.</p><p>De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. Pyschometrika 75(4), 778-779.</p><p>De Champlain, A. F. (2010). A Primer on Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for Assessments in Medical Education. Medical Education, 44, 109-117.</p><p>DeMars, C. (2010). Item Respons Theory: Understanding Statistic Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.</p><p>DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2011). High Aspirations but Low Progression: The Science Aspirations - Careers Paradox Amongst Minority Ethnic Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9(2), 243-271.</p><p>Donald, M. (2003). Origins of The Modern Mind: Three Stages in The Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p>Ducan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., & Klebanov, P. (2007). School Readiness and Later Acvhievement. Developmental Psychology.</p><p>Duong, M. (2004). Introduction to Item Response Theory and Its Applications. Proseminar in Learning, Technology and Culture.</p><p>Eckes, T. (2015). Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Language Testing and Evaluation 2nd Revised and Updated Edition. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang.</p><p>Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Respons Theory for Psychologist. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</p><p>Englehard, G., Jr. (2013). Invariant measurement. New York: Routledge.</p><p>Fox, T. B. (2007). Applying Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</p><p>Fox, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1998). Uses of Rasch Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 30-45.</p><p>Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics: An Introduction Second Edition. United States of America: Sage Publication.</p><p>Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications. NJ USA: Pearson Education.</p><p>George, E. J. & Stefanie, A. W., (2018). Invariant Measurement With Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments. Third Avenue, New York. Routledge.</p><p>Gregory, R. J. (1996). Norms and Reliability. In R. J. Gregory, Psychologcal Testing: History, Principles, and Applications (pp. 62-105). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.</p><p>Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications (5th Ed.). Boston: Pearson International.</p><p>Gunnar, G. (2009). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 41, 41(13):1021-3.</p><p>Hair, J., Black, W., Barbin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Ed.). Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.</p><p>Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Respons Theory. USA: Sage Publication.</p><p>Hambleton, R. K. (2000). The Next Generationof The ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 164-172.</p><p>Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38-47.</p><p>Hishamuddin. (2016). Analisis Item Aneka Pilihan Peperiksaan Akhir Anatomi dan Fisiologi Diploma Kejururawatan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tanjung Malim Perak</p><p>Holmes, W., Bix, B. & Shea, J. (1996). SF-20 Score and Item Distribution in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Seropositive Sample. Medical Care; 34: 562-569.</p><p>Holmes, W. & Shea, J. (1997). A New HIV Disease-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire.</p><p>Hudiya, A., & Aidah, A. (2017). Pembangunan Instrumen Jurang Digital Bagie-Pembelajaran Menggunakan Analisis Rasch. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (1997). Standard-Setting: An Alternative Approach. Journal of Education Measurement, 34, 353-366.</p><p>Jackson, T. R., Draugalis, J. R., Slack, M. K., Zachry, W. M., Dgostino, J. (2002). Validation of Authentic Performance Assessment: A Process Suited for Rasch Modeling. Am J Pharm Educ 2002; 66: 233-243.</p><p>Jaeger, R. M. (1993). Statistics: A Spectator Sport (Second Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.</p><p>Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological Testing: Principles, Application and Issues. Pacific Grove: Brooks Cole Pub. Company.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2020). Pendidikan Prasekolah. Diperolehi pada 17 Julai 2020 daripada www.moe.edu.my.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2020). Pendidikan Rendah. Diperolehi pada 17 Julai 2020 daripada www.moe.edu.my.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2020). Pendidikan Menengah. Diperolehi pada 17 Julai 2020 daripada www.moe.edu.my.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2020). Pendidikan Lepasan Menengah. Diperolehi pada 17 Julai 2020 daripada www.moe.edu.my.</p><p>Lai, J. S. & Eton, D. T. (2002). Clinically Meaningful Gaps. Rasch Measurement Transactions 15(4): 850</p><p>Lamoureux, E. L., Pesudovs, K., Thumboo, J., Saw, S. M., & Wong, T. Y. (2009). An Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of The Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VF-11) Using Rasch Analysis in An Asian Population.</p><p>Linacre, J. M. (2006). Data Variance Explained by Measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 20:1045 - 1047.</p><p>Linacre, J. M. (2007). Standard Errors and Reliabilities: Rasch and Row Score. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 20(4), 1086. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt204f.htm.</p><p>Linacre, J. M. (2010). A User's Guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press.</p><p>Linacre, J. M. (2013). FACETS Version 3.71.3 [Computer Software and manual]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.</p><p>Lord, F. M. (1980). Application of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillside. Linden, W. J., & Ronald, K. H. (2010). Handbook of Modern Item Respons Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.</p><p>Lord, F. M. (1983). Small Justifies the Rasch Model. New Horizons in Testing, 51-61.</p><p>Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.</p><p>Ludlow, L. H., & Guida, F. (1991). Constructing a Scale of Academic Anxiety. Chicago, IL: Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.</p><p>Luecht, R. M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224-236.</p><p>Malaysia Majlis Peperiksaan. (2012). Pengajian Am: Sukatan Pelajaran dan Kertas Soalan Contoh. Sungai Buloh, Selangor Darul Ehsan: Tihani Cetak Sdn Bhd.</p><p>McManus, I. C., Powis, D. A., Wakeford, R., Forguson, E., James, D., & Richards, P. (2005). Intellectual Aptitude Tests and A Levels for Selecting UK School Leaver Entrants for Medical School. British Medical Journal, 331, 555-559.</p><p>Messick, S. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. American Psychologist, 741-749.</p><p>Messick, S. (1989). Educational Measurement (3rd Edition). New York: Macmillan.</p><p>Miller T.R & Cleary T.A. (1993). Direction of Wording effects in balance scales. Educations and Psychological Measurement. 53, 51-60.</p><p>Mohamed Mustafa, I. (2017). Pengumuman Keputusan Peperiksaan Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) Tahun 2017. Putrajaya: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2017). Laporan Tahunan. Batu Caves Selangor.</p><p>MPM. (2013). Manual Teknik dan Gaya Penulisan Soalan Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2013). Pengajian Am: Sukatan Pelajaran dan Kertas Soalan. Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2017). Pengajian Am: Manual Pelaksanaan Kerja Kursus Mata Pelajaran Pengajian Am STPM. Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2017). Kriteria Pentaksiran Kerja Kursus Mata Pelajaran Pengajian Am STPM. Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2018). Skema Peperiksaan Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM). Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>MPM. (2019). Panduan Pelaksanaan Kerja Kursus Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) Edisi Ke-5. Batu Caves, Kuala Lumpur: Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>Murphy, K., & Davidshofer, C. (1998). Psychological Testing: Principles and Application (4th Ed.) . Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Nazlinda Abdullah. (2011). Performance Indicator on Parallel Circuit Conceptual Test (PCCTUT): A Fit Statistic Approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013), 431 - 440.</p><p>Norasmah, O., Suria, M. S., Halizah, H., & Haryaty, A. W. (2014). Assessing Construct Validity and Reliability of Competitiveness Scale Using Rasch Model Approach. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. Bali Indonesia.</p><p>Novick, M. R. (1966). The Axioms and Principal Result of Classical Test Theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3, 1-18.</p><p>Nunnally, J. C. (1978). The Study of Change in Evaluation Research: Principle Concerning Measurement, Experimental Design, and Analysis. Dalam Elmer, L. S. & Guttentag, M. (Eds). Handbook of Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.</p><p>Omar, M. H. (2003, May 5-8). Pentaksiran Pendidikan Alaf Baru. Kertas Kerja Seminar Persidangan Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Osterlind, S. J. (1992). Constructing Test Item (2nd Edition). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.</p><p>Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An Introduction to the Rasch Measurement Model: An Example Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1-18.</p><p>Parra-Lopez, E., & Oreja-Rodriguez, J. R. (2014). Evaluation of the competitiveness of tourist zones of an island destination: An application of a many-facets Rasch model (MFRM). Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 3(2), 114121.</p><p>Payne, D. A. (1974). The Assessment of Learning. Lexington MA: Heath.</p><p>Popham, W. (1975). Educational Evaluation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.</p><p>Popham, W. (1981). Modern Educational Measurement. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Pustaka, D. B. (2005). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Rafidah M. A., & Mohd Effendi Ewan M. M. (2019). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen I-CGPKM Menggunakan Model Rasch. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis. JQMA 15(1) 2019, 1-14</p><p>Rahaya, A. S. (2003). Teori, Konsep & Amalan Dalam Pengukuran dan Penilaian. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Ampang Press Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Raju, N. S., Price, L. R., Oshima, T., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Standardize Conditional SEM: A Case for Conditional Reliability. Applied Psychology Measurement, 30(X), 1-12.</p><p>Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Model For Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (Reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B. D. Wright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen, Denmark: Denmarks Paedogogiske Institut.</p><p>Reeve, B. B. (2006 ). Introduction to Item Response Theory (IRT) Modeling and Applications for Survey Research. One day workshop sponsored by the Joint Program in Survey Methodology (JPSM): Bethesda, MD.</p><p>Reeve, B. B. (2002). An Introduction to Modern Measurement Theory. USA: Springer.</p><p>Ronald K. Hambleton & Russell W. Jones. (1993). Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Respons Theory and Their Application to Test Development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38-47.</p><p>Ruhaibah, H. (2015). Ciri-Ciri Psikometrik "Malaysian University Selection Inventory"(MUnSyI) Menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch . Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p>Schumacker, R. E. & Smith, E. V. (2007). A Rasch Perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, V67 N3. 394-409.</p><p>Siti Eshah, M. (2018). Teori Respons Item Dalam Penyelidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Smith, R. M. (2000). Fit Analysis in Latent Trait Measurement Models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 199-218.</p><p>Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scale: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (4th Ed.). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.</p><p>Suen, H. K. (2010). Principles of Test Theories. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.</p><p>Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1984). Heredity and Familial Environment in Intelligence and Educational Level a Sibling Study. Nature Publishing Group 309, 620-622.</p><p>Tineke, B., Luke, H., & Aaron, O. B., (2018) Going online: The effect of mode of delivery on performances and perceptions on an English L2 writing test suite. United Kingdom. Assessing Writing 36. 3-18</p><p>Thomas, E., (2015). Language Testing and Evaluation: Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Analyzing and Evaluating Rater-Mediated Assessments). New York: Peter Lang GmbH.</p><p>Thompson, N. A. (2009). Ability Estimation With Item Response Theory. White Paper. Assessment Systems Corporation 2233 University Avenue, Suite 200: St. Paul, Minnesota 55114.</p><p>Tuckman, B. W. (1978). Conducting Educational Research. New York: Harcout Brace Jovanovich Inc.</p><p>William, J. B., & John R. S. (2020). Advances in Rasch Analyses in The Human Sciences. Switzerland. Springer Nature.</p><p>William, J. B., John R. S., & Melissa, S. Y. (2014). Rasch Analysis in The Human Sciences. New York London. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.</p><p>Willnat L. & Weaver D. H. (2005). Global Trends in Communication Education and Research. Journalism Education in the United States. 37-52</p><p>Wu, M. L & Adams, R, J. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model to Psycho-Social Measurement: A Practical Approach. Educational Measurement Solutions. Melbourne.</p><p>Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: Pluribus Press.</p><p>Zeng, J., & Wyse, A. (2009). Introduction to Classical Test Theory. Michigan: W. Allegan Lansing. </p><p></p><p></p> |