Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure
To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates th...
محفوظ في:
المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
---|---|
التنسيق: | أطروحة |
اللغة: | English English English |
منشور في: |
2016
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
id |
my-uthm-ep.926 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
spelling |
my-uthm-ep.9262021-09-09T06:01:05Z Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure 2016-03 Naser Frak, Anwar QA75-76.95 Calculating machines To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates the functionality of a set of sorting techniques to observe which technique to provide better efficiency in terms of sorting data. Therefore, five types of sorting techniques of static data structure, namely: Bubble, Insertion, Selection in group O (n2) complexity and Merge, Quick in group O (n log n) complexity using the C++ programming language have been used. Each sorting technique was tested on four groups between 100 and 30000 of dataset. To validate the performance of sorting techniques, three performance metrics which are time complexity, execution time (run time) and size of dataset were used. All experimental setups were accomplished using simple linear regression where experimental results illustrate that Quick sort is more efficiency than Merge Insertion, Selection and Bubble sort based on run time and size of data using array and Selection sort is more efficient than Bubble and Insertion in large data size using array. In addition, Bubble, Insertion and Selection have good performance for small data size using array while Merge and Quick sort have good performance in large data size using array and sorting technique with good behavior O (n log n) more efficient rather than sorting technique with bad behavior is O (n2) using array. 2016-03 Thesis http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf text en public http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf text en staffonly http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf text en validuser mphil masters Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology |
institution |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
collection |
UTHM Institutional Repository |
language |
English English English |
topic |
QA75-76.95 Calculating machines |
spellingShingle |
QA75-76.95 Calculating machines Naser Frak, Anwar Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
description |
To manage and organize large data is imperative in order to formulate the data analysis and data processing efficiency. Thus, to handle large data becomes highly enviable, whilst, it is premised that the sorting techniques eliminate ambiguities with less effort. Therefore, this study investigates the functionality of a set of sorting techniques to observe which technique to provide better efficiency in terms of sorting data. Therefore, five types of sorting techniques of static data structure, namely: Bubble, Insertion, Selection in group O (n2) complexity and Merge, Quick in group O (n log n) complexity using the C++ programming language have been used. Each sorting technique was tested on four groups between 100 and 30000 of dataset. To validate the performance of sorting techniques, three performance metrics which are time complexity, execution time (run time) and size of dataset were used. All experimental setups were accomplished using simple linear regression where experimental results illustrate that Quick sort is more efficiency than Merge Insertion, Selection and Bubble sort based on run time and size of data using array and Selection sort is more efficient than Bubble and Insertion in large data size using array. In addition, Bubble, Insertion and Selection have good performance for small data size using array while Merge and Quick sort have good performance in large data size using array and sorting technique with good behavior O (n log n) more efficient rather than sorting technique with bad behavior is O (n2) using array. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.) |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
author_facet |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
author_sort |
Naser Frak, Anwar |
title |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
title_short |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
title_full |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
title_fullStr |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
title_sort |
comparison study on sorting techniques in static data structure |
granting_institution |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
granting_department |
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/1/24p%20ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/2/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20COPYRIGHT%20DECLARATION.pdf http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/926/3/ANWAR%20NASER%20FRAK%20WATERMARK.pdf |
_version_ |
1747830715553153024 |