Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects

In Malaysian construction industry, traditional procurement method is the most common method of procuring a project. In this method, the client contracts with consultants, and has another separate contract with the contractor. Consultants will prepare building designs in accordance to their expertis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48877/25/GilbertGanSiangMFAB2015.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.48877
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.488772020-07-05T02:53:28Z Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects 2015-01 Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang TH Building construction In Malaysian construction industry, traditional procurement method is the most common method of procuring a project. In this method, the client contracts with consultants, and has another separate contract with the contractor. Consultants will prepare building designs in accordance to their expertise. Meanwhile contractor will contract with the client to construct the building based on designs given. However, human made mistakes happen, where design defects exist in consultants’ design. Contractor during construction may discover design defects. But sadly, many contractors have a mindset that they are only contracted to construct, and any design defects is not their concern. Some may even intentionally keep silent about the discovery, so that they are able to claim for variation order for when rectification works are required to heal the problem caused by the design defect. Thus, the objective of this study is to identify whether contractor has the implied duty to warn design defects. The research methodology undertaken is by documentary analysis of law cases reported in law journals. The research have identified relevant clauses in the standard forms of contracts, and also eleven law cases related to contractor’s duty to warn design defects. The findings of the analysis are: Contractor owes duty of care to his client. He is expected to warn client of design defect if a reasonably competent contractor would have noticed it and highlight it to his client. Lastly, even if contractor has raised the discovery to his client or contract administrator and was instructed to continue to construct, the contractor will still be liable, as mere discussion of the risk will not release contractor from being responsible. Contractor should take formal and further steps to warn about the perceived dangers and even refusal to carry out the works. 2015-01 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48877/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48877/25/GilbertGanSiangMFAB2015.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:87877 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment Faculty of Built Environment
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TH Building construction
spellingShingle TH Building construction
Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang
Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
description In Malaysian construction industry, traditional procurement method is the most common method of procuring a project. In this method, the client contracts with consultants, and has another separate contract with the contractor. Consultants will prepare building designs in accordance to their expertise. Meanwhile contractor will contract with the client to construct the building based on designs given. However, human made mistakes happen, where design defects exist in consultants’ design. Contractor during construction may discover design defects. But sadly, many contractors have a mindset that they are only contracted to construct, and any design defects is not their concern. Some may even intentionally keep silent about the discovery, so that they are able to claim for variation order for when rectification works are required to heal the problem caused by the design defect. Thus, the objective of this study is to identify whether contractor has the implied duty to warn design defects. The research methodology undertaken is by documentary analysis of law cases reported in law journals. The research have identified relevant clauses in the standard forms of contracts, and also eleven law cases related to contractor’s duty to warn design defects. The findings of the analysis are: Contractor owes duty of care to his client. He is expected to warn client of design defect if a reasonably competent contractor would have noticed it and highlight it to his client. Lastly, even if contractor has raised the discovery to his client or contract administrator and was instructed to continue to construct, the contractor will still be liable, as mere discussion of the risk will not release contractor from being responsible. Contractor should take formal and further steps to warn about the perceived dangers and even refusal to carry out the works.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang
author_facet Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang
author_sort Gan, Gilbert Siang Yang
title Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
title_short Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
title_full Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
title_fullStr Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
title_full_unstemmed Contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
title_sort contractor's implied duty to warn design defects
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Built Environment
granting_department Faculty of Built Environment
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48877/25/GilbertGanSiangMFAB2015.pdf
_version_ 1747817493576024064