A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia

A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia

Managing workforce performance is a goal-oriented process to maximise the productivity of employees and is a critical aspect of organizational effectiveness. However, relatively limited research has been conducted on the relationship between Performance Management system and discrimination especial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
HM Sociology.
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3029/1/Mohamed_Safuan_Mohamed_Taib.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3029
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
advisor Daud, Zulkiflee
topic HM Sociology.
HM Sociology.
spellingShingle HM Sociology.
HM Sociology.
Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib
A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
description Managing workforce performance is a goal-oriented process to maximise the productivity of employees and is a critical aspect of organizational effectiveness. However, relatively limited research has been conducted on the relationship between Performance Management system and discrimination especially in Malaysia. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between Performance Management System and discrimination in a financial institution. Data were collected from 64 respondents and analysed through questionnaires. The result was being analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 19. From the data analysed, the result revealed that the independent variable (discrimination) have negative correlations with dependent variable (performance management system). The findings, recommendations and implication for future research were also discussed.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib
author_facet Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib
author_sort Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib
title A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
title_short A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
title_full A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
title_fullStr A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia
title_sort study on relationship between perceived discrimination and performance management system: a case study of a financial institution in malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Business (COB)
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3029/1/Mohamed_Safuan_Mohamed_Taib.pdf
_version_ 1747827483885961216
spelling my-uum-etd.30292016-04-20T02:26:21Z A Study on Relationship Between Perceived Discrimination and Performance Management System: A Case Study of a Financial Institution in Malaysia 2012-04 Mohamed Safuan, Mohamed Taib Daud, Zulkiflee College of Business (COB) College of Business HM Sociology. HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management Managing workforce performance is a goal-oriented process to maximise the productivity of employees and is a critical aspect of organizational effectiveness. However, relatively limited research has been conducted on the relationship between Performance Management system and discrimination especially in Malaysia. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between Performance Management System and discrimination in a financial institution. Data were collected from 64 respondents and analysed through questionnaires. The result was being analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 19. From the data analysed, the result revealed that the independent variable (discrimination) have negative correlations with dependent variable (performance management system). The findings, recommendations and implication for future research were also discussed. 2012-04 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3029/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3029/1/Mohamed_Safuan_Mohamed_Taib.pdf application/pdf eng validuser masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Aguinis, H. (2009), Performance management (2eds). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice-Hall. Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001). The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management, 27(4), 479–495. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2009). Managing performance. Performance management in action. London. Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development. Arvey, R.D., & Murphy, K.R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 141–168. Arvey, R.D., Azevedo, R.E., Ostgaard, D.J., & Raghuram, S. (1996). The implications of a diverse labor market on human resource planning. In E.E. Kossek & S.A. Lobel (Eds.), Managing diversity: Human resource strategies for transforming the workplace (pp. 51-73). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Ary, D., Jacobs L.C., & Razavieh, A. (1996). introduction to research in education (5ed.), Florida, Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Bernardin, H. J., Cooke, D. K., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 232–236. Bernardin, H.J., Hagan, C.M., Kane, J.S., & Villanova. (1998). Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints. In J.W.Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 3-48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Boice, D. F., & Kleiner, B.H. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. Work Study of Journal, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 197-201. Bowles, M.L. & Coates, G. (1993). Image and substance: the management of performance as rhetoric or reality?, Personnel Review, 22(2), 3-21. Carlton, I., & Sloman, M. (1992). Performance appraisal in practice, Human Resource Management Journal, 2(3), 80-94. Cascio, W. F. (2006). Global performance management systems. In I. Bjorkman, & G. Stahl (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resources management (pp. 176–196). London, UK: Edward Elgar Ltd. Cavana, H., Delahaye, E., & Sekaran, U. (2000). Applied business research qualitative and quantitative methods. Australia. John Wiley. Cook, M. (1995). Performance appraisals and true performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(7), 3-7. Coutts, L.M., & Schneider, F.W. (2004). Police officer performance appraisal systems: how good are they? International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27 (1), 67-81. Cox, T., Jr. (1994). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. DeBusk, G. K., Killough, L. N., & Brown, R. B. (2005). Intolerance of ambiguity effects on evaluations with the balanced scorecard. The Innovation Congress. 3(1), 1-31. Deem, J.W., Barnes, B., Segal, S., & Preziosi, R. (2010). The Relationship of organizational culture to balanced scorecard effectiveness. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 31-39. Demuijnck, G. (2009). Non-discrimination in human resources management as a moral obligation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 83–101. DeNisi, A.S., & Kluger, A.N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness. Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14,129-139. Dipboye, R.L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 116-127. Engelmann, C.H., & Roesch, C.H. (1996). Managing individual performance. Scottsdale, Ariz., American Compensation Association. Fernandez. J. P. (1981). Racism and sexism in corporations. Lexington. KY: Toronto. Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: the developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74. Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (2001). Gender differences in rating reports: Female managers are harsher raters, particularly of males. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(4): 281. Ghauri, P.N. (1995) Research methods in business studies: a practical. guide UK: Prentice Hall. Gleveland, J. N., & Landy, F. J. (1981). The influence of rater and ratee on two performance judgments. Personnel PsychoJogy, 34, 19-29. H. W. Hennessey, H.W., & Bernardin, H.J. (2003). Human resource management, 42(2), 143–158. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Halim, A., & Ali, M. M. (1988). Administration and management of training programmes. Bangladesh Journal of Training and Development, 1 (2), 1-19. Hendry, C., Woodward, S.A., Bradley, P., & Perkins, S.J. (2000). Performance and rewards: cleaning out the stables, Human Resource Management Journal, 10(3), 46-62. Hoyle, R. H., (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Tinsley, H.E.A., Brown, S.D. (Eds), Handbook of Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling (pp 465-497). San Diego, Academic Press,. Ivancevich, J.M. (2001). Human resource management (8eds). New York, McGraw-Hill Irwin. Jackson, S.E., & Alvarez, E.B. (1992). Working through diversity as a strategic imperative. In S.E. Jackson & Associates (Eds.), Diversity in the Workplace (pp. 13–29). New York: Guilford Press. Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85-117. King, A.G., & Spruell, S.P. (2001). Coca-Cola takes the high road. Black Enterprise, 31(7), 29. Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 45(2): 194. Kraiger. K.. & Ford., K. A. (1983). Meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association. Anaheim. Califomia.. Laseter, R.L. (1994). The labor force participation of young Black men: A qualitative examination. Social Service Review. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 72-88. Longenecker, C.O. (1997). Why managerial performance appraisals are ineffective: causes and lessons. Career Development International, 2 (5), 212-218. Lucy, F., David, J. M., Kathleen, A. M., & Claude, L. (2004). How can managers reduce employee intention to quit? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(2), 170-187. Norhayati, M.A., & Siti-Nabiha, A.K. (2009). A case study of the performance management system in a Malaysian government linked company. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5(2), 12-24. McCoy, F. (1995). Rethinking the cost of discrimination, Black Enterprise, 25, 54-59. Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Moore, K.A. (2002). Hospital restructuring: impact on nurses mediated by social support and a perception of challenge. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. Moullakis, J. (2005). One in five workers ‘‘actively disengaged’’. The Australian Financial Review, 10. Muchinsky, P.M. (1993). Psychology Applied to Work (4eds.). California, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. California, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Nankervis, A. T., & Compton, A. R. (2006), Performance management: theory in practice?. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 83-101. Newton, T., & Findlay, P. (1996). Playing god? The performance appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(3), 42-56. Ngo, H., Foley, S., Wong A., & Loi, R. (2003). Who gets more of the pie? Predictors of perceived gender inequity at work. Journal of Business Ethics 45(3), 227–241. Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. H., Gerhart, B., & Wight, P.M. (2010). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (3eds.). Singapoer, Mc Graw Hill. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2eds). New York: McGraw-Hill. Levy, P.E., & Williams, J.R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905. Pedder, L. (1998). Training-needs analysis. Nursing Standard. 13(6), 50-56. National Association for Employee Recognition (NAER), 2003, cited from www.clc.executiveboard.com. Creating an Effective Reward and Recognition Program, (March 2006). Puecell, J., Kinnie, K., Huchinson, S., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2003). Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box. London, CIPD. Pulakos, E.D. (2009). Performance Management. A new approach for driving business results. West Sussex:UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management (Part II). Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21-31. Rolstadas, A. (1995). Performance management. A business process benchmarking approach. Boundary Row, London. Chapman and Hall. Schermerhorn, & Osborn. (2006). Organizational Behavior (9eds). West Sussex, UK, John Wiley & sons. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approaches. New York. Prentice-Hall Sims, M. et al. (2009). Development and psychometric testing of a multidimensional instrument of perceived discrimination among African American. In the Jackson Heart study, 19(1), 56–64. Sinclair, R. C. (1988). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 22–46. Smith, M., & Brough, P. (2003). Personnel recruitment and selection. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Stiles, P., Gratton, L., & Truss, C. (1997). Performance management and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management Journal, 2(1), 57-66. Struthers, C. W., Weiner, B., & Allred, K. (1998). Effects of causal attributions on personnel decisions: A social motivation perspective. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 155–166. Tinker, S. & Moore, K.A. (2001). The impact of long work hours on the family-work relationship and health. (paper presented at the Inaugural Conference of APS. Relationships Interest Group, Melbourne, 17-18 November). Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University, ILR Press. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (1981). Affirmative action in the 1980s: Dismantling the process of discrimination. Clearinghouse Publication 65, Washing-ton, D.C. Wunder, R.S., Dougherty, T.W. & Welsh, M.A. (1982). A causal model of role stress and employee turnover. Academy of Management, 42, 297-301.

Similar Items