Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service

Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service

The effectiveness of Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is important because it measures the performance of employees, which is useful in enhancing organizational performance. Hence, the aims of this research is to study strategic alignment, employee involvement, continuous feedback, proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2014
Subjects:
HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/1/s815940.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/7/s815940_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4690
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Pangil, Faizuniah
topic HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
spellingShingle HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management
Employment
Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin
Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
description The effectiveness of Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is important because it measures the performance of employees, which is useful in enhancing organizational performance. Hence, the aims of this research is to study strategic alignment, employee involvement, continuous feedback, procedural justice, interactional justice and distributive justice as the predictor of EPMS satisfaction. Respondents for this study comprised 250 of Public Servants from four ministries in Putrajaya, specifically Ministry of Education, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Prime Minister Department. Multiple regressions were used to determine the strength of the relationship and results showed that the employee involvment, procedural justice and distributive justice is significantly relationship to EPMS satisfaction.Thus, it is recommended that existing EPMS in Malaysian Public Service needs to upgrade certain aspects such as employee involvement, procedural justice and distributive justice in order to increase its effectiveness of the EPMS.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin
author_facet Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin
author_sort Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin
title Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
title_short Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
title_full Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
title_fullStr Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service
title_sort factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (epms): a study on the malaysian public service
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2014
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/1/s815940.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/7/s815940_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827781640650752
spelling my-uum-etd.46902022-04-10T00:29:44Z Factors affecting the effectiveness of employee performance management system (EPMS): A study on the Malaysian Public Service 2014 Azrul Fazli, Kamarudin Pangil, Faizuniah Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HF5549-5549.5 Personnel Management. Employment The effectiveness of Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is important because it measures the performance of employees, which is useful in enhancing organizational performance. Hence, the aims of this research is to study strategic alignment, employee involvement, continuous feedback, procedural justice, interactional justice and distributive justice as the predictor of EPMS satisfaction. Respondents for this study comprised 250 of Public Servants from four ministries in Putrajaya, specifically Ministry of Education, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Prime Minister Department. Multiple regressions were used to determine the strength of the relationship and results showed that the employee involvment, procedural justice and distributive justice is significantly relationship to EPMS satisfaction.Thus, it is recommended that existing EPMS in Malaysian Public Service needs to upgrade certain aspects such as employee involvement, procedural justice and distributive justice in order to increase its effectiveness of the EPMS. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/1/s815940.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4690/7/s815940_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abraham G.A., Strategic Alignment. Learn How To Execute Effectively Leadership Excellent, Aug 2006, 23, 8; ProQuest pg. 12. Abdul Hamid, A.S. (1992), Development of Public Administration in Malaysia, Pelanduk, Kuala Lumpur. Abdul Hamid, AS. (1996), The Civil Service: Towards a New Era, Pelanduk Publications, Kuala Lumpur. Abdul Manap, N. (1996), "Performance evaluation: finance and non-finance", unpublished Master's thesis, School of Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman. Aguinis, H (2009) Performance Management, 2nd edition, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Ahmad, R & Ali, N.A. (2004) Performance Appraisal decision in Malaysia Public Service, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(1), 48-64. Alders, M. L. (2000). The Influence of Goal Orientation on Employee Response to Performance Feedback. Making Organizational Feedback System More Effective. Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook or Human Resource Management Practice (10th ed.) London: Kogan Page. Banner, D. K., & Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical Issues in Performance Appraisal. Journal of Management Developmenf, 4(1), 26-35. doi:lO.l108/eb051573. Beck D.E. (2000), Performance Based Assessment: Using Pre-Established Criteria and Continuous Feedback to Enhance a Student's Ability to Perform Practice Tasks. BERNAMA (2000), Government Reviewing SSB-Dr. Mahathir, BERNAMA, Kuala Lumpur, 21 February. Bhatnagar, D. (2013). Perceived Fairness of Employees in Performance Appraisal System : With Reference to Indian Public and Private Sector Banks. GMJ, Vol 111, Issue 1 & 2, January-December 2013. Boice, D. F., & Kleiner, B. H. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. Work Study, 46(6), 197-201. Byrne, Z. S., & Cropanzano, R. (2011). The History of Organizational Justice : The Founders Speak In the Workplace : From Theory to Practice, 3-26, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Carolyn, L. (1991), Employee involvement and organization performance Chompukum, P. (2011). Performance Management Effectiveness in Thai Banking Industry : A look from performers and a role of interactional justice. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies. Cintrón, R., Corresponding, P. D., Flaniken, F., & Ed, D. (1990). Performance Appraisal : A Supervision or Leadership Tool ?, 2(17), 29-38. Cynthia, A., & Peter, Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice : a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vo1. 86, No. 3, pp. 386-400. Daly, P. S. (1997) . Perceptions of Fairness: The Role of Employees Scripts, Situation Prototypes, and Locus of Causality in Evaluations of the Procedural Justice of Performance Appraisal Interviews. Dusterhoff, C. (2014) The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgement Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 119: 265-273. Fleenor, J. W., & Prince, J. M. (1997) Using 360-degree feedback in organizations: An annoted bibliography. Greensboro, NC : Center for Creative Leadership. Foo, P. (1998), "Kognitif Perspektif dalam Sistem Penilaian Prestasi", Tesis Master Pengurusan (Tidak Diterbitkan), Fakulti Sains Kognitif dan Pembangunan Manusia, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching. Folger, R. & Cropanzano, R. S. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Ghulam, S. A. G. G. (1993). Distributive Justive versus Procedural Justice : Perceptions of fairness of Saudi Arabian Civil Service Employees in their Performance Appraisal System. Gopinath, M. N. (2009). Performance Management System, 6(August), 1-9. Goodman, J., Wood, R. & Hendrickx, M. (2004). Feedback Specificity, Exploration and Learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 248-262. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432. Hair, J. F., Jr, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall. Heathcote J.M. (2006), Predicting Fair Behaviour: Using Empathy to Understand a Manager's Procedural and Interactional Justice. Johnson, J. S. (2003). Employees' Justice Perceptions of Performance Appraisal System : Attitudinal, Behavioral and Performance Consequences. Jones, J. E. & Bearley, W. L. (1996). Strategies, tactics and techniques for developing leaders. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc. Kondrasuk, J. N. (2012). THE IDEAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IS A FORMAT, NOT A FORM, 11(l), 115-131. Lam, S. S. K. (2002). Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 192-201. Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. (1990). Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 1l, 5-25. Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 751-754. Lavelle J. (1999), Examining layoff survivor's charges in targets of commitment: Differentiating the effects of Interactional and Procedural Justice. Lawler, E. E. (1988). Choosing an involvement strategy. Academic Management Executive 2(3). Lawler, E. E., Benson, G. S., & McDermott, M. (2012). What Makes Performance Appraisals Effective? Compensation & Benefits Review, 44(4), 191-200. Mathe, K., & Slevitch, L. (2011). An Exploratory Examination of Supervisor Undermining, Employee Involvement Climate, and the Effects on Customer Perceptions of Service Quality in Quick-Service Restaurants. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 37(1), 29-50. Mohd Zin, H. (1998), "Teacher perception towards performance appraisal system", unpublished Master thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman. Niehoff B.P. & Moorman R. H. (1998), Does Perceived Organizational Support Mediate The Relationship Between Procedural Justice And Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Academy of Management Journal 1998, Vol. 4, No. 3, 351-357. Nunnally, J, (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P. & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011). Organizational Justice and Employee Satisfaction in Performance Appraisal. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vo1. 35, No. 8, 2Oll, pp. 826-840. Prowse, P., & Prowse, J. (2009). The dilemma of performance appraisal. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(4), 69-77. Pooyan, A., & Eberhardt, B.J. (1989). Correlates of Performance Appraisal Satisfaction Among Supervisory and Nonsupervisory Employee. Journal of Business Research 1989: 19: 215-226. Rahman, W., Shah, B., Sciences, A., & Pakhtunkhwa, K. (2012). The Mediating Effects of Perceived Employee Development on the Relationships between Performance Appraisal and Job Performance in Public Universities of Khyber, 2(1), 11-26. Rankin, G. D., & Kleiner, B. H. (1988). EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL, (February), 13-17. Redman, T., & Snape, E. (1992). Upward and Onward: Can Staff Appraise Their Managers? Personnel Review, 21(7), 32-46. Schappe, S. P. (1996). Bridging the Gap between Procedural Knowledge and Positive Employee Attitudes: Procedural Justice as Keystone. Group & Organization Management, 21(3),337-364. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. USA:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Smith, V. (2014). in a White-Collar Arrangements Service Occupation Involved Employee Involvement, Employees: Participative Work, 43(2), 166-179. Spinks, N., Wells, B., & Meche, M. (1999). Appraising the appraisals: computerized performance appraisal systems. Career Development International, 4(2), 94-100. Stringer C. (2007), The Relationship Between Strategic Alignment, Meaningful Work, and Employee Engagement. Strom D.L. (2010), Workplace Engagement: The Roles of Transformational Leadership And Interactional Justice In Producing Engaged Employees. Toll M. K., (2006), An Examination of the Relationships Between Perceived Procedural and Distributive Justice, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviours. Tong, T. L. & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. 91996). Distributive and Procedural Justice as related to satisfaction and commitment, Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 25-31. Towne, N.D. (2006), Employee Performance Appraisal Systems: Effect On Communication Within Organization. Utusan Malaysia (2001), Sistem Penilaian Prestasi Perlu Diperbaiki-Dr. Mazlan, Nizam Abdul Hamid, 31 January 2001. Vanichchinchai, A. (2012). The relationship between employee involvement, partnership management and supply performance: Findings from a developing country. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 157-172. Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2013). A Multilevel Model of Employee Innovation: Understanding the Effects of Regulatory Focus, Thriving, and Employee Involvement Climate. Journal of Management. Walter, J., Kellermanns, F. W., Floyd, S. W., Veiga, J. F., Matherne, C., & Walter, J. (2013). Strategic Organization organizational performance. Weatherly, L. (2004). Performance Management : Getting It Right From The Start. HR Magazine 49(3), 1-10. Williams, S., Pitre, R. & Zainuba, M. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 33-46. Quick J. C. (2014), Influence of Distributive Justice on Volunteer Satisfaction and Intention to quit as a Function of the Importance of Extrinsic Outcomes. Yu, L. (2008). The Relationship Between Employee-Supervisor Cultural Differences and Perceived Procedural Justice In Performance Appraisal Among Chinese Employees. Zhou J. (2003), Research On Employee Creativity: A Critical Review And Directions For Future Research, Personnel and Human Management, 165-217.

Similar Items