Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan

Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan

This study is an experimental survey that had been undertaken in a primary school in Sandakan district, Sabah. The purpose of this study is to know the learning impact of constructivism approach on Year Five pupil's achievement in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject, especially in language system. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasiah, Arjani
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/1/s805186.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/2/s805186_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4784
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Awang, Mohd. Isha
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Hasiah, Arjani
Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
description This study is an experimental survey that had been undertaken in a primary school in Sandakan district, Sabah. The purpose of this study is to know the learning impact of constructivism approach on Year Five pupil's achievement in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject, especially in language system. Thee main aspects that studied namely from difference achievements of group, types of test, and gender gap differences. This three aspects tested on two groups which be different approach of lesson angle. Remedial group is an experimental group who had undergone in constructivism approach method. The duration is in eight weeks and the Treatment group will be approach by a traditional method created as comparison group from the aspect that studied. Respondent in this study consisting of 80 pupils including boy and girl inb year Five that divided into two groups and every group consisting of 40 pupils which differ in gender to every group. Treatment group consisting of 17 boys and 23 girls, while control group consisting of 27 boys and 13 girls. Instrument that used in this study is two sets objective question that conducted by two examination phase namely pre test and post test. Pre test given to both groups which aims to know readiness level and pupil present knowledge in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject. Post test on the other hand given to both groups after expiry treatment group under go teaching and learning by using constructivism method approach in eight weeks of time. Information data that achieved were processed and analyzed by using software "Statistical Package For The Social Sciences" version 19.0 and description made based on descriptive analysis and T-test. The fascinating of this study is it would enhance the achievement significantly (t(39)= -14.274, p<.05) in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject, compared to the achievement of treatment group that taught in traditional method. Apart from that, results of the study also showed significant differences in both types of test that governed through pre test and post test. This study also found no differences in gender that significant between pupils in treatment group in constructivism method approach
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Hasiah, Arjani
author_facet Hasiah, Arjani
author_sort Hasiah, Arjani
title Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
title_short Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
title_full Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
title_fullStr Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
title_full_unstemmed Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan
title_sort kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran bahasa melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah sandakan
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/1/s805186.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/2/s805186_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827800939692032
spelling my-uum-etd.47842022-06-08T00:25:38Z Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi murid tahun 5 dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu di sebuah sekolah rendah, daerah Sandakan 2011 Hasiah, Arjani Awang, Mohd. Isha Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This study is an experimental survey that had been undertaken in a primary school in Sandakan district, Sabah. The purpose of this study is to know the learning impact of constructivism approach on Year Five pupil's achievement in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject, especially in language system. Thee main aspects that studied namely from difference achievements of group, types of test, and gender gap differences. This three aspects tested on two groups which be different approach of lesson angle. Remedial group is an experimental group who had undergone in constructivism approach method. The duration is in eight weeks and the Treatment group will be approach by a traditional method created as comparison group from the aspect that studied. Respondent in this study consisting of 80 pupils including boy and girl inb year Five that divided into two groups and every group consisting of 40 pupils which differ in gender to every group. Treatment group consisting of 17 boys and 23 girls, while control group consisting of 27 boys and 13 girls. Instrument that used in this study is two sets objective question that conducted by two examination phase namely pre test and post test. Pre test given to both groups which aims to know readiness level and pupil present knowledge in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject. Post test on the other hand given to both groups after expiry treatment group under go teaching and learning by using constructivism method approach in eight weeks of time. Information data that achieved were processed and analyzed by using software "Statistical Package For The Social Sciences" version 19.0 and description made based on descriptive analysis and T-test. The fascinating of this study is it would enhance the achievement significantly (t(39)= -14.274, p<.05) in Paper 1 Bahasa Melayu subject, compared to the achievement of treatment group that taught in traditional method. Apart from that, results of the study also showed significant differences in both types of test that governed through pre test and post test. This study also found no differences in gender that significant between pupils in treatment group in constructivism method approach 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/1/s805186.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4784/2/s805186_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Jalil Othman & Bahtiar Omar (2005). Aplikasi Pembelajaran Secara konstruktivisme dalam Pengajaran Karangan-berpandu. Masalah pendidikan, 28, 221-232. Abdul Rahim Rashid (1998), Ilmu Sejarah: Teori dan amalan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Abdul Shukor (2003), Hubungan motivasi, keupayaan mengajar dan komitmen kerja dengan prestasi kerja guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah. Kajian Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Angela Anthonysamy (1998). Perkembangan pernikiran Matematik pada peringkat awal kanak-kanak. Satu pendekatan konstruktivisme. Dicapai dari http://www.ipbl. edu.my/inter/penyelidikan/1998/98.Angela.pdf pada 4 November 2010. Arif Sukardi (1987). Prinsip-prinsip (teori) pembelajaran. (20 Dis 2000). Arsaythamby Veloo & Arumugam Raman (2009). Panduan menganalisis & menginterpretasi data. Kedah: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune. Briner, M. (2005). (Atas Talian): http://carbon. cudenver.edu/-mryder/itcdatalconstructivism.html Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. (1993). Traditional vs. constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development, (ASCD), 46-57. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Brooks, J.G. & Books, M.G. (1999). The courage to be constructivist. Educational leadership, 57(3). Bybee, R. W. (1993). Leadership, responsibility and reform in science education. Science educator, 2, l-9. Campbell, D.T & Stanley, J.C (1963). Experimental an quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Creswell, J.W (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey. Pearson education, Inc. Merrill Prentice Hall. Dick, W. (1992). An instructional designer's view of constructivism. In T.M. Durn & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 91-98. Dick, M.H. (1994). An Instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational technology, May, 41-44. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teacher College Press. 8-33. Gagnon, G.W Dan Collay, M. (2001). Contructivist learning design. Dicapai dari http://www.prainbow.com/cld/cldp.htm Pada 1 Mac 2010. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2003). Huraian sukatan pelajaran Bahasa Melayu Tahun 5. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001a). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001b). Sukatan pelajaran Bahasa Melayu KBSR. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Lord, T.R., (2001), 101 Reasons for using cooperative learning in biology teaching, The American Biology teaching, The American Biology Teacher, 63, 30-38 Lay Yoon Fah & Khoo Chwee Hoon (2008). Pengenalan kepada analisis statistik dalam penyelidikan sains sosial (siri 2). Selangor Darul Ehsa.: Venton Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd. Mad Rosli Saraamu (2009). Teori konstruktivisme model Needham. Dicapai dari http://mrosli79family.blogspot.com/ pada 15 April 2011. McBrien, J. L., dan Brandt, R S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to education terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Mohd. Majid Konting (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Cetakan Keempat. Kuala Lumpur.: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Needham, R. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. The University of Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education. Nik Azis Nik Pa (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Nor Aini Aziz (2002). Keberkesanan pengajaran pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam membina semula konsepsi pelajar tentang konsep-konsep fotosintesis dan makanan. Tesis Ph.D., Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Noor Hayati Saleh, Noor Azliza Ahmad & Ismail Khairullah Mohd Radhzi (2008). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan pendekatan konstruktivisme menerusi pembelajaran inkuiri-penemuan bagi topik sel tumbuhan. Dicapai dari http://www.kpmk.matrik. edu.my/webrnd pada 25 April 2011. Piaget, J. (1970). Equilibration of cognitive structure. New York: Viking Press. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.L., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T.M. D u e & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rizawati Ab Halim, (2010). Penggunaan model konstruktivisme dalam mata pelajaran sains pertanian. Dicapai dari www.images.rizawatiagro. multiply.multiplyconten.com pada 18 April 2011. Ruzlan Md. Ali & Fuziah Shaffie, (2009). Amalan pendekatan belajar. Kedah: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Subadrah Nair dan Malar a/p Muthiah (2005), Penggunaan model konstruktivisme lima fasa Needham dalam pembelajaran sejarah. Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Sushkin, N. (1999). (Tajuk artikel tidak dinyatakan). Dicapai dari http://www.carbon.cudenver.edu/mryder/ite-data/ constructivism.html Pada 15 November 2010. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way aknowing and learning. London: Falmer. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57. Yahya Buntat & Amirudin Yusof (2010). Pendekatan pembelajaran secara kontruktivisme dalam kalangan guru-guru teknikal bagi mata pelajaran teknikal. Dicapai dari http://www.eprints.utm.my/ pada 25 April 2011. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing. Zainal Abidin Zainuddin & Afrinaleni Suardi (2010). Keberkesanan kaedah konstruktivisme dalarn pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik. Dicapai dari http://eprintis.utm.my/ pada 22 Mac 2011. Zurida Ismail, Syarifah Norhaidah Syed Idros & Mohd. Ali Samsudin, (2006). Kaedah Mengajar Sains. Pahang: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn.Bhd.

Similar Items